winter-super-cli 2026.5.15

package/resources/local/claude/plugins/marketplaces/claude-plugins-official/plugins/plugin-dev/skills/hook-development/references/migration.md

@@ -0,0 +1,369 @@
+# Migrating from Basic to Advanced Hooks
+
+This guide shows how to migrate from basic command hooks to advanced prompt-based hooks for better maintainability and flexibility.
+
+## Why Migrate?
+
+Prompt-based hooks offer several advantages:
+
+- **Natural language reasoning**: LLM understands context and intent
+- **Better edge case handling**: Adapts to unexpected scenarios
+- **No bash scripting required**: Simpler to write and maintain
+- **More flexible validation**: Can handle complex logic without coding
+
+## Migration Example: Bash Command Validation
+
+### Before (Basic Command Hook)
+
+**Configuration:**
+```json
+{
+  "PreToolUse": [
+    {
+      "matcher": "Bash",
+      "hooks": [
+        {
+          "type": "command",
+          "command": "bash validate-bash.sh"
+        }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+**Script (validate-bash.sh):**
+```bash
+#!/bin/bash
+input=$(cat)
+command=$(echo "$input" | jq -r '.tool_input.command')
+
+# Hard-coded validation logic
+if [[ "$command" == *"rm -rf"* ]]; then
+  echo "Dangerous command detected" >&2
+  exit 2
+fi
+```
+
+**Problems:**
+- Only checks for exact "rm -rf" pattern
+- Doesn't catch variations like `rm -fr` or `rm -r -f`
+- Misses other dangerous commands (`dd`, `mkfs`, etc.)
+- No context awareness
+- Requires bash scripting knowledge
+
+### After (Advanced Prompt Hook)
+
+**Configuration:**
+```json
+{
+  "PreToolUse": [
+    {
+      "matcher": "Bash",
+      "hooks": [
+        {
+          "type": "prompt",
+          "prompt": "Command: $TOOL_INPUT.command. Analyze for: 1) Destructive operations (rm -rf, dd, mkfs, etc) 2) Privilege escalation (sudo) 3) Network operations without user consent. Return 'approve' or 'deny' with explanation.",
+          "timeout": 15
+        }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+**Benefits:**
+- Catches all variations and patterns
+- Understands intent, not just literal strings
+- No script file needed
+- Easy to extend with new criteria
+- Context-aware decisions
+- Natural language explanation in denial
+
+## Migration Example: File Write Validation
+
+### Before (Basic Command Hook)
+
+**Configuration:**
+```json
+{
+  "PreToolUse": [
+    {
+      "matcher": "Write",
+      "hooks": [
+        {
+          "type": "command",
+          "command": "bash validate-write.sh"
+        }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+**Script (validate-write.sh):**
+```bash
+#!/bin/bash
+input=$(cat)
+file_path=$(echo "$input" | jq -r '.tool_input.file_path')
+
+# Check for path traversal
+if [[ "$file_path" == *".."* ]]; then
+  echo '{"decision": "deny", "reason": "Path traversal detected"}' >&2
+  exit 2
+fi
+
+# Check for system paths
+if [[ "$file_path" == "/etc/"* ]] || [[ "$file_path" == "/sys/"* ]]; then
+  echo '{"decision": "deny", "reason": "System file"}' >&2
+  exit 2
+fi
+```
+
+**Problems:**
+- Hard-coded path patterns
+- Doesn't understand symlinks
+- Missing edge cases (e.g., `/etc` vs `/etc/`)
+- No consideration of file content
+
+### After (Advanced Prompt Hook)
+
+**Configuration:**
+```json
+{
+  "PreToolUse": [
+    {
+      "matcher": "Write|Edit",
+      "hooks": [
+        {
+          "type": "prompt",
+          "prompt": "File path: $TOOL_INPUT.file_path. Content preview: $TOOL_INPUT.content (first 200 chars). Verify: 1) Not system directories (/etc, /sys, /usr) 2) Not credentials (.env, tokens, secrets) 3) No path traversal 4) Content doesn't expose secrets. Return 'approve' or 'deny'."
+        }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+**Benefits:**
+- Context-aware (considers content too)
+- Handles symlinks and edge cases
+- Natural understanding of "system directories"
+- Can detect secrets in content
+- Easy to extend criteria
+
+## When to Keep Command Hooks
+
+Command hooks still have their place:
+
+### 1. Deterministic Performance Checks
+
+```bash
+#!/bin/bash
+# Check file size quickly
+file_path=$(echo "$input" | jq -r '.tool_input.file_path')
+size=$(stat -f%z "$file_path" 2>/dev/null || stat -c%s "$file_path" 2>/dev/null)
+
+if [ "$size" -gt 10000000 ]; then
+  echo '{"decision": "deny", "reason": "File too large"}' >&2
+  exit 2
+fi
+```
+
+**Use command hooks when:** Validation is purely mathematical or deterministic.
+
+### 2. External Tool Integration
+
+```bash
+#!/bin/bash
+# Run security scanner
+file_path=$(echo "$input" | jq -r '.tool_input.file_path')
+scan_result=$(security-scanner "$file_path")
+
+if [ "$?" -ne 0 ]; then
+  echo "Security scan failed: $scan_result" >&2
+  exit 2
+fi
+```
+
+**Use command hooks when:** Integrating with external tools that provide yes/no answers.
+
+### 3. Very Fast Checks (< 50ms)
+
+```bash
+#!/bin/bash
+# Quick regex check
+command=$(echo "$input" | jq -r '.tool_input.command')
+
+if [[ "$command" =~ ^(ls|pwd|echo)$ ]]; then
+  exit 0  # Safe commands
+fi
+```
+
+**Use command hooks when:** Performance is critical and logic is simple.
+
+## Hybrid Approach
+
+Combine both for multi-stage validation:
+
+```json
+{
+  "PreToolUse": [
+    {
+      "matcher": "Bash",
+      "hooks": [
+        {
+          "type": "command",
+          "command": "bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/quick-check.sh",
+          "timeout": 5
+        },
+        {
+          "type": "prompt",
+          "prompt": "Deep analysis of bash command: $TOOL_INPUT",
+          "timeout": 15
+        }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+The command hook does fast deterministic checks, while the prompt hook handles complex reasoning.
+
+## Migration Checklist
+
+When migrating hooks:
+
+- [ ] Identify the validation logic in the command hook
+- [ ] Convert hard-coded patterns to natural language criteria
+- [ ] Test with edge cases the old hook missed
+- [ ] Verify LLM understands the intent
+- [ ] Set appropriate timeout (usually 15-30s for prompt hooks)
+- [ ] Document the new hook in README
+- [ ] Remove or archive old script files
+
+## Migration Tips
+
+1. **Start with one hook**: Don't migrate everything at once
+2. **Test thoroughly**: Verify prompt hook catches what command hook caught
+3. **Look for improvements**: Use migration as opportunity to enhance validation
+4. **Keep scripts for reference**: Archive old scripts in case you need to reference the logic
+5. **Document reasoning**: Explain why prompt hook is better in README
+
+## Complete Migration Example
+
+### Original Plugin Structure
+
+```
+my-plugin/
+├── .claude-plugin/plugin.json
+├── hooks/hooks.json
+└── scripts/
+    ├── validate-bash.sh
+    ├── validate-write.sh
+    └── check-tests.sh
+```
+
+### After Migration
+
+```
+my-plugin/
+├── .claude-plugin/plugin.json
+├── hooks/hooks.json      # Now uses prompt hooks
+└── scripts/              # Archive or delete
+    └── archive/
+        ├── validate-bash.sh
+        ├── validate-write.sh
+        └── check-tests.sh
+```
+
+### Updated hooks.json
+
+```json
+{
+  "PreToolUse": [
+    {
+      "matcher": "Bash",
+      "hooks": [
+        {
+          "type": "prompt",
+          "prompt": "Validate bash command safety: destructive ops, privilege escalation, network access"
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "matcher": "Write|Edit",
+      "hooks": [
+        {
+          "type": "prompt",
+          "prompt": "Validate file write safety: system paths, credentials, path traversal, content secrets"
+        }
+      ]
+    }
+  ],
+  "Stop": [
+    {
+      "matcher": "*",
+      "hooks": [
+        {
+          "type": "prompt",
+          "prompt": "Verify tests were run if code was modified"
+        }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+**Result:** Simpler, more maintainable, more powerful.
+
+## Common Migration Patterns
+
+### Pattern: String Contains → Natural Language
+
+**Before:**
+```bash
+if [[ "$command" == *"sudo"* ]]; then
+  echo "Privilege escalation" >&2
+  exit 2
+fi
+```
+
+**After:**
+```
+"Check for privilege escalation (sudo, su, etc)"
+```
+
+### Pattern: Regex → Intent
+
+**Before:**
+```bash
+if [[ "$file" =~ \.(env|secret|key|token)$ ]]; then
+  echo "Credential file" >&2
+  exit 2
+fi
+```
+
+**After:**
+```
+"Verify not writing to credential files (.env, secrets, keys, tokens)"
+```
+
+### Pattern: Multiple Conditions → Criteria List
+
+**Before:**
+```bash
+if [ condition1 ] || [ condition2 ] || [ condition3 ]; then
+  echo "Invalid" >&2
+  exit 2
+fi
+```
+
+**After:**
+```
+"Check: 1) condition1 2) condition2 3) condition3. Deny if any fail."
+```
+
+## Conclusion
+
+Migrating to prompt-based hooks makes plugins more maintainable, flexible, and powerful. Reserve command hooks for deterministic checks and external tool integration.

package/resources/local/claude/plugins/marketplaces/claude-plugins-official/plugins/plugin-dev/skills/hook-development/references/patterns.md

@@ -0,0 +1,346 @@
+# Common Hook Patterns
+
+This reference provides common, proven patterns for implementing Claude Code hooks. Use these patterns as starting points for typical hook use cases.
+
+## Pattern 1: Security Validation
+
+Block dangerous file writes using prompt-based hooks:
+
+```json
+{
+  "PreToolUse": [
+    {
+      "matcher": "Write|Edit",
+      "hooks": [
+        {
+          "type": "prompt",
+          "prompt": "File path: $TOOL_INPUT.file_path. Verify: 1) Not in /etc or system directories 2) Not .env or credentials 3) Path doesn't contain '..' traversal. Return 'approve' or 'deny'."
+        }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+**Use for:** Preventing writes to sensitive files or system directories.
+
+## Pattern 2: Test Enforcement
+
+Ensure tests run before stopping:
+
+```json
+{
+  "Stop": [
+    {
+      "matcher": "*",
+      "hooks": [
+        {
+          "type": "prompt",
+          "prompt": "Review transcript. If code was modified (Write/Edit tools used), verify tests were executed. If no tests were run, block with reason 'Tests must be run after code changes'."
+        }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+**Use for:** Enforcing quality standards and preventing incomplete work.
+
+## Pattern 3: Context Loading
+
+Load project-specific context at session start:
+
+```json
+{
+  "SessionStart": [
+    {
+      "matcher": "*",
+      "hooks": [
+        {
+          "type": "command",
+          "command": "bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/load-context.sh"
+        }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+**Example script (load-context.sh):**
+```bash
+#!/bin/bash
+cd "$CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR" || exit 1
+
+# Detect project type
+if [ -f "package.json" ]; then
+  echo "📦 Node.js project detected"
+  echo "export PROJECT_TYPE=nodejs" >> "$CLAUDE_ENV_FILE"
+elif [ -f "Cargo.toml" ]; then
+  echo "🦀 Rust project detected"
+  echo "export PROJECT_TYPE=rust" >> "$CLAUDE_ENV_FILE"
+fi
+```
+
+**Use for:** Automatically detecting and configuring project-specific settings.
+
+## Pattern 4: Notification Logging
+
+Log all notifications for audit or analysis:
+
+```json
+{
+  "Notification": [
+    {
+      "matcher": "*",
+      "hooks": [
+        {
+          "type": "command",
+          "command": "bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/log-notification.sh"
+        }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+**Use for:** Tracking user notifications or integration with external logging systems.
+
+## Pattern 5: MCP Tool Monitoring
+
+Monitor and validate MCP tool usage:
+
+```json
+{
+  "PreToolUse": [
+    {
+      "matcher": "mcp__.*__delete.*",
+      "hooks": [
+        {
+          "type": "prompt",
+          "prompt": "Deletion operation detected. Verify: Is this deletion intentional? Can it be undone? Are there backups? Return 'approve' only if safe."
+        }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+**Use for:** Protecting against destructive MCP operations.
+
+## Pattern 6: Build Verification
+
+Ensure project builds after code changes:
+
+```json
+{
+  "Stop": [
+    {
+      "matcher": "*",
+      "hooks": [
+        {
+          "type": "prompt",
+          "prompt": "Check if code was modified. If Write/Edit tools were used, verify the project was built (npm run build, cargo build, etc). If not built, block and request build."
+        }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+**Use for:** Catching build errors before committing or stopping work.
+
+## Pattern 7: Permission Confirmation
+
+Ask user before dangerous operations:
+
+```json
+{
+  "PreToolUse": [
+    {
+      "matcher": "Bash",
+      "hooks": [
+        {
+          "type": "prompt",
+          "prompt": "Command: $TOOL_INPUT.command. If command contains 'rm', 'delete', 'drop', or other destructive operations, return 'ask' to confirm with user. Otherwise 'approve'."
+        }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+**Use for:** User confirmation on potentially destructive commands.
+
+## Pattern 8: Code Quality Checks
+
+Run linters or formatters on file edits:
+
+```json
+{
+  "PostToolUse": [
+    {
+      "matcher": "Write|Edit",
+      "hooks": [
+        {
+          "type": "command",
+          "command": "bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/check-quality.sh"
+        }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+**Example script (check-quality.sh):**
+```bash
+#!/bin/bash
+input=$(cat)
+file_path=$(echo "$input" | jq -r '.tool_input.file_path')
+
+# Run linter if applicable
+if [[ "$file_path" == *.js ]] || [[ "$file_path" == *.ts ]]; then
+  npx eslint "$file_path" 2>&1 || true
+fi
+```
+
+**Use for:** Automatic code quality enforcement.
+
+## Pattern Combinations
+
+Combine multiple patterns for comprehensive protection:
+
+```json
+{
+  "PreToolUse": [
+    {
+      "matcher": "Write|Edit",
+      "hooks": [
+        {
+          "type": "prompt",
+          "prompt": "Validate file write safety"
+        }
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "matcher": "Bash",
+      "hooks": [
+        {
+          "type": "prompt",
+          "prompt": "Validate bash command safety"
+        }
+      ]
+    }
+  ],
+  "Stop": [
+    {
+      "matcher": "*",
+      "hooks": [
+        {
+          "type": "prompt",
+          "prompt": "Verify tests run and build succeeded"
+        }
+      ]
+    }
+  ],
+  "SessionStart": [
+    {
+      "matcher": "*",
+      "hooks": [
+        {
+          "type": "command",
+          "command": "bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/load-context.sh"
+        }
+      ]
+    }
+  ]
+}
+```
+
+This provides multi-layered protection and automation.
+
+## Pattern 9: Temporarily Active Hooks
+
+Create hooks that only run when explicitly enabled via flag files:
+
+```bash
+#!/bin/bash
+# Hook only active when flag file exists
+FLAG_FILE="$CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/.enable-security-scan"
+
+if [ ! -f "$FLAG_FILE" ]; then
+  # Quick exit when disabled
+  exit 0
+fi
+
+# Flag present, run validation
+input=$(cat)
+file_path=$(echo "$input" | jq -r '.tool_input.file_path')
+
+# Run security scan
+security-scanner "$file_path"
+```
+
+**Activation:**
+```bash
+# Enable the hook
+touch .enable-security-scan
+
+# Disable the hook
+rm .enable-security-scan
+```
+
+**Use for:**
+- Temporary debugging hooks
+- Feature flags for development
+- Project-specific validation that's opt-in
+- Performance-intensive checks only when needed
+
+**Note:** Must restart Claude Code after creating/removing flag files for hooks to recognize changes.
+
+## Pattern 10: Configuration-Driven Hooks
+
+Use JSON configuration to control hook behavior:
+
+```bash
+#!/bin/bash
+CONFIG_FILE="$CLAUDE_PROJECT_DIR/.claude/my-plugin.local.json"
+
+# Read configuration
+if [ -f "$CONFIG_FILE" ]; then
+  strict_mode=$(jq -r '.strictMode // false' "$CONFIG_FILE")
+  max_file_size=$(jq -r '.maxFileSize // 1000000' "$CONFIG_FILE")
+else
+  # Defaults
+  strict_mode=false
+  max_file_size=1000000
+fi
+
+# Skip if not in strict mode
+if [ "$strict_mode" != "true" ]; then
+  exit 0
+fi
+
+# Apply configured limits
+input=$(cat)
+file_size=$(echo "$input" | jq -r '.tool_input.content | length')
+
+if [ "$file_size" -gt "$max_file_size" ]; then
+  echo '{"decision": "deny", "reason": "File exceeds configured size limit"}' >&2
+  exit 2
+fi
+```
+
+**Configuration file (.claude/my-plugin.local.json):**
+```json
+{
+  "strictMode": true,
+  "maxFileSize": 500000,
+  "allowedPaths": ["/tmp", "/home/user/projects"]
+}
+```
+
+**Use for:**
+- User-configurable hook behavior
+- Per-project settings
+- Team-specific rules
+- Dynamic validation criteria