weflow-cli 1.8.1 → 1.8.2

package/CHANGELOG.md

@@ -4,6 +4,23 @@ The npm package is published separately from GitHub. It may lag behind the `mast
 
 All notable user-facing changes are recorded here. This project follows [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/).
 
+## 1.8.2
+
+### Changed
+
+- **The ball no longer casts a drop shadow.** The user reported that the mascot's background was
+  "not fully transparent" and asked for another round of matting. **It was not the image**: the PNGs
+  are clean - all four corners are `(0,0,0,0)`, the solid areas sit at alpha 253/255, and the only
+  low-alpha pixels are 674 anti-aliasing edge pixels within 4-8 px of solid ones. What they were
+  seeing was `filter: drop-shadow(...)` on the ball, which was there deliberately ("a transparent
+  subject needs it to separate from a light wallpaper") and pinned by a test.
+
+  The trade-off is recorded rather than glossed: that earlier check covered whether the **transparent
+  background** stayed legible against light, mid and dark wallpapers - not whether it does so
+  **without a shadow**, so this is a new, unverified visual change. If the cat ends up looking
+  unmoored, the line to bring back is a much fainter one, and it is written in `panel.css` next to
+  the `filter: none`. Hover feedback survives on `scale(1.02)` and `brightness(1.08)`.
+
 ## 1.8.1
 
 ### Changed

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "weflow-cli",
-  "version": "1.8.1",
+  "version": "1.8.2",
   "description": "让 AI 读懂你的微信 — 公众号日报·聊天导出·知识库搜索·MCP Server",
   "type": "module",
   "bin": {

package/resources/panel/panel.css

@@ -129,8 +129,17 @@ header {
      那是因为它的内容本来只占 59%x67%——**余量是结果，不是规则**。） */
   background-color: transparent;
 
-  /* 投影跟着猫的轮廓走（不是跟着那个不存在的圆），透明主体靠它跟浅色壁纸分开 */
-  filter: drop-shadow(0 6px 12px rgba(0, 0, 0, .50));
+  /* **不画投影**（2026-09-29 用户要求去掉的）。
+     它原先在这里，理由是"透明主体靠它跟浅色壁纸分开"；用户看到的是**猫轮廓外一圈灰黑影**，
+     读成了"背景没完全透明"。**先澄清一件事：那不是图的问题** —— 实测这几张 PNG 的四角是
+     `(0,0,0,0)`，实心区 alpha 253/255，低 alpha 像素只有 674 个且都贴着实心区 4-8 像素
+     （是描边锯齿，不是底）。所以问题在这一行 CSS，不在抠图。
+     代价要知道：去掉之后深色猫在某些壁纸上的分离感会弱一点。当初试过浅/中/深三种底，
+     但那回测的是"**透明底**读不读得清"，不是"**没有投影**读不读得清" —— 所以这条是新的、
+     还没验过的视觉变化。真觉得飘的话，把它改回一行很淡的就够：
+     `filter: drop-shadow(0 2px 4px rgba(0, 0, 0, .22));`
+     悬停时仍然看得出反馈：`transform: scale(1.02)` 与 `brightness(1.08)` 都还在。 */
+  filter: none;
   /* 回弹曲线（不是 ease）：松手时从压扁弹回原状会**轻微过冲**一下，那就是"弹"的感觉。
      窗口就是球这么大，过冲出来的那点边缘靠出图时留的 2% 余量兜住。 */
   transition: transform .16s cubic-bezier(.34, 1.56, .64, 1), filter .16s ease;
@@ -257,7 +266,7 @@ body.quota #ball .glow { animation: none; opacity: .85; }
 /* 悬停：微微放大 + 阴影加深 + 提亮 —— 三样一起才够"这里能点"。
    **放大只敢到 1.02**：出图按"实心像素最远点 ≤ 0.98 × 半径"缩放（见 `.face` 那段），
    1.02 倍时圆外只剩 1 个像素（实测），再大就开始削掉猫的外缘。 */
-#ball:hover { transform: scale(1.02); filter: drop-shadow(0 8px 16px rgba(0, 0, 0, .58)) brightness(1.08); }
+#ball:hover { transform: scale(1.02); filter: brightness(1.08); }
 /* 按下：压扁。**只往小里做** —— 放大或位移会把内容顶出窗口、被窗口边裁掉。 */
 #ball:active { transform: scale(.92); }