wdi-method 0.5.13 → 0.5.14

package/kit/.constitution/method/document/delivery-flow-guide.md

@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ their rows join the catalogue and the three inventories, and **G3 reopens over t
 | Agent at G1–G3 | Writes the brief, the PRD, and the blueprint | Decide depth or accept risk |
 | Agent at G4 | Writes one component's behaviour and mechanism | Write code |
 | Builder | One story through to a green PR | Change `.what/`, `.how/`, or an `applied` decision |
-| Review panel | Two different CLI families, neither the builder's | Give a final verdict — findings are adjudicated by the coordinator |
+| Review panel | Reviews the diff independently of the builder | Give a final verdict — findings are adjudicated by the coordinator |
 
 Panel composition and CLI/model selection are governed by the global Agent Rules and MUST NOT be restated
 here.

package/kit/.constitution/method/why/README.md

@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ the corpus. No → `_bmad-output/`. In doubt, `../document/corpus-guide.md`.
 |---|---|
 | Decisions — proposing a slicing, wording a `DEC-`, preparing a gate | `opus@high` |
 | Writing, derivation, a review-fix pass | `sonnet@high` |
-| Code review panel | Two different CLI families, and never the family that wrote the code |
+| Code review panel | Reviewers dispatched separately from the builder — the local Agent Rules govern CLI/model pairing |
 
 In a derivation pass, quality comes from the input rather than the model. Running a "find the gap" lens with
 the most careful model produces the most gaps, and each one becomes an open question — a cost nobody sees

package/kit/assets/bmad-custom/bmad-code-review.toml

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-# Review Panel: two reviewers from two different CLI families, and neither may come from the
-# family that ran the implementation.
+# Review Panel: two reviewers, each dispatched separately from the builder. Which CLIs and models
+# staff the panel is governed by the local Agent Rules, not by this kit.
 #
 # WARNING: the adversarial and edge-case lenses here are read from the bundled copy of
 # review-prompts/, NOT from the bmad-review skill. An override on bmad-review will not be visible

package/kit/skills/wdi-build/SKILL.md

@@ -124,8 +124,9 @@ Three rules this corpus adds. All three MUST be stated in the dispatch of any st
 
 Panel composition follows `risk_accepted`: at `low` a two-reviewer panel is **required** on the code; at
 `medium` and `high` it is available and SHOULD be used when the diff touches money, personal data, or a third
-party. The Agent Rules `bmad-code-review panel` section defines the pairing, and it MUST be followed exactly —
-the worker's own review layers are same-family by construction and never satisfy it.
+party. The local Agent Rules govern which CLIs and models staff the panel. A reviewer MUST be a dispatch
+separate from the builder — the worker's own review layers are self-review by construction and never satisfy
+the panel.
 
 - MUST adjudicate every contested finding by reading the cited lines. Votes MUST NOT settle a finding. A finding
   neither reviewer can locate in the diff is dismissed with that reason stated.
@@ -227,7 +228,7 @@ Run in this order and stop at the first failure:
 - Opening a PR with an unresolved must-fix, or before the story-closing checklist is answered
 - Editing a guard, a test, or an assertion to turn something green
 - Reporting green without checking the head SHA, or reading green `korpus.yml` as a passing build
-- A reviewer from the same CLI family as the builder
+- Counting the builder's own review layers as a panel reviewer
 - Dispatching a worker without its Unattended flag
 - Closing the wave without the registry catch-up in Phase 4 — that is where five checklist items now live
 - Letting `SPEC.md` state something `.what/` and `.how/` do not

package/kit/skills/wdi-review/SKILL.md

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ artifact but of the component's `risk_accepted`, and defaulting to structure + p
 one lens that matters for behaviour; and `bmad-review` is class D — it writes nothing, so nothing proves
 it ran.
 
-You MUST NOT use this for code or diffs. That is `bmad-code-review` and the two-family Review Panel.
+You MUST NOT use this for code or diffs. That is `bmad-code-review` and the Review Panel.
 
 ## What it covers
 

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "wdi-method",
-  "version": "0.5.13",
+  "version": "0.5.14",
   "description": "WDI Method — software delivery method that wraps BMad",
   "type": "module",
   "bin": {