vibe-coding-master 0.7.0 → 0.7.2

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/README.md CHANGED
@@ -390,11 +390,11 @@ VCM runs it from the active task worktree.
390
390
 
391
391
  ### Auto Memory
392
392
 
393
- Enable `Auto memory` in the `VCM Harness` sidebar group to collect durable role
394
- knowledge after a complete task passes Final Acceptance. Project Manager,
395
- Architect, Coder, Tester, and an enabled Gate Reviewer submit memory drafts in
396
- sequence. Harness Engineer verifies and consolidates them before VCM applies
397
- the result.
393
+ `Auto memory` is the switch for the entire automated memory workflow. During
394
+ Review Task Harness after Final Acceptance, Project Manager, Architect, Coder,
395
+ Tester, and an enabled Gate Reviewer submit proposals in sequence through
396
+ `vcm-propose-memory`. Harness Engineer verifies and consolidates them before VCM
397
+ applies the result. Roles cannot edit active memory directly.
398
398
 
399
399
  Canonical memory is stored under the base repository's `.ai/vcm/memory/`.
400
400
  Harness Studio shows current memory and task-local applied history. Memory is
@@ -405,14 +405,16 @@ Post-task processing is ordered by the backend:
405
405
 
406
406
  ```text
407
407
  Final Acceptance
408
- -> Auto Memory, when enabled
408
+ -> Review Task Harness
409
+ -> Memory proposals and Harness Engineer review, when Auto Memory is enabled
409
410
  -> Task Harness Retrospective
410
411
  ```
411
412
 
412
- Auto Memory adds no retrospective prerequisite when it is disabled. When it is
413
- enabled, both automatic and manual retrospective requests wait until memory has
414
- been applied for the current Final Acceptance. A failed memory review must be
415
- retried from Harness Studio before retrospective can run.
413
+ When Auto Memory is disabled, Review Task Harness does not collect proposals or
414
+ ask Harness Engineer to update memory. When enabled, both automatic and manual
415
+ review requests complete the memory phase before retrospective analysis. A
416
+ failed memory review must be retried from Harness Studio before retrospective
417
+ can continue.
416
418
 
417
419
  ## Closing a Task
418
420
 
@@ -154,15 +154,21 @@ export function registerHarnessRoutes(app, deps) {
154
154
  });
155
155
  app.post("/api/projects/harness/task-retrospective", async (request) => {
156
156
  const { project, task } = await requireHarnessTaskContext(deps, request.body?.taskSlug);
157
- await deps.autoMemoryService.assertTaskRetrospectiveReady({
157
+ const trigger = request.body?.trigger === "auto" ? "auto" : "manual";
158
+ const memoryInput = {
158
159
  baseRepoRoot: project.repoRoot,
159
160
  taskRepoRoot: task.worktreePath,
160
161
  taskSlug: task.taskSlug,
161
162
  handoffDir: task.handoffDir,
162
- roundReady: true
163
- });
163
+ roundReady: true,
164
+ requestTrigger: trigger
165
+ };
166
+ await deps.autoMemoryService.reconcileTask(memoryInput);
167
+ const memoryReadiness = await deps.autoMemoryService.getTaskRetrospectiveReadiness(memoryInput);
168
+ if (!memoryReadiness.ready) {
169
+ return deps.harnessFeedbackService.getState(project.repoRoot, task.taskSlug);
170
+ }
164
171
  await deps.autoMemoryService.assertHarnessEngineerAvailable(task.worktreePath);
165
- const trigger = request.body?.trigger === "auto" ? "auto" : "manual";
166
172
  return deps.harnessFeedbackService.startTaskRetrospective(project.repoRoot, {
167
173
  taskSlug: task.taskSlug,
168
174
  taskRepoRoot: task.worktreePath,
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ import { renderTesterHarnessRules } from "../templates/harness/tester-agent.js";
20
20
  import { renderVcmFinalAcceptanceSkillRules } from "../templates/harness/vcm-final-acceptance-skill.js";
21
21
  import { renderVcmHarnessBootstrapSkillRules } from "../templates/harness/vcm-harness-bootstrap-skill.js";
22
22
  import { renderVcmLongRunningValidationSkillRules } from "../templates/harness/vcm-long-running-validation-skill.js";
23
+ import { renderVcmProposeMemorySkillRules } from "../templates/harness/vcm-propose-memory-skill.js";
23
24
  import { renderVcmReportHarnessIssueSkillRules } from "../templates/harness/vcm-report-harness-issue-skill.js";
24
25
  import { renderVcmRouteMessageSkillRules } from "../templates/harness/vcm-route-message-skill.js";
25
26
  import { readVcmPackageVersion } from "../app-version.js";
@@ -248,6 +249,12 @@ const WHOLE_FILES = [
248
249
  mode: 0o644,
249
250
  content: renderSkillFile("VCM Report Harness Issue Skill", "vcm-report-harness-issue", "Use when a VCM role notices a reusable harness problem and needs to record feedback for Harness Engineer review.", renderVcmReportHarnessIssueSkillRules())
250
251
  },
252
+ {
253
+ path: ".claude/skills/vcm-propose-memory/SKILL.md",
254
+ category: "skill",
255
+ mode: 0o644,
256
+ content: renderSkillFile("VCM Propose Memory Skill", "vcm-propose-memory", "Use only when VCM requests a role memory proposal during Task Harness Review.", renderVcmProposeMemorySkillRules())
257
+ },
251
258
  {
252
259
  path: ".ai/tools/request-gate-review",
253
260
  category: "runtime-tool",
@@ -476,6 +483,7 @@ function fixedDirectories() {
476
483
  ".claude/skills/vcm-route-message/",
477
484
  ".claude/skills/vcm-gate-review/",
478
485
  ".claude/skills/vcm-report-harness-issue/",
486
+ ".claude/skills/vcm-propose-memory/",
479
487
  ".ai/vcm/translations/",
480
488
  ".ai/vcm/gate-reviews/",
481
489
  ".ai/tools/",
@@ -62,11 +62,16 @@ export function createAutoMemoryService(deps) {
62
62
  }
63
63
  async function getState(baseRepoRoot, taskRepoRoot) {
64
64
  await ensureTaskMemorySnapshot(deps.fs, baseRepoRoot, taskRepoRoot);
65
- const [active, runs, files] = await Promise.all([
65
+ let [active, runs, files] = await Promise.all([
66
66
  loadActiveState(taskRepoRoot),
67
67
  listRuns(taskRepoRoot),
68
68
  listMemoryFiles(taskRepoRoot)
69
69
  ]);
70
+ if (active && !(await deps.appSettings.getPreferences()).autoMemoryEnabled) {
71
+ await discardActiveReview(taskRepoRoot, active);
72
+ active = undefined;
73
+ runs = await listRuns(taskRepoRoot);
74
+ }
70
75
  return {
71
76
  version: 1,
72
77
  status: active?.status ?? "idle",
@@ -79,6 +84,13 @@ export function createAutoMemoryService(deps) {
79
84
  async function reconcileTask(input) {
80
85
  await ensureTaskMemorySnapshot(deps.fs, input.baseRepoRoot, input.taskRepoRoot);
81
86
  const active = await loadActiveState(input.taskRepoRoot);
87
+ const preferences = await deps.appSettings.getPreferences();
88
+ if (!preferences.autoMemoryEnabled) {
89
+ if (active) {
90
+ await discardActiveReview(input.taskRepoRoot, active);
91
+ }
92
+ return getState(input.baseRepoRoot, input.taskRepoRoot);
93
+ }
82
94
  if (active?.status === "collecting") {
83
95
  await dispatchCurrentDraft(input.baseRepoRoot, input.taskRepoRoot, active);
84
96
  return getState(input.baseRepoRoot, input.taskRepoRoot);
@@ -87,11 +99,7 @@ export function createAutoMemoryService(deps) {
87
99
  await dispatchHarnessReview(input.baseRepoRoot, input.taskRepoRoot, active);
88
100
  return getState(input.baseRepoRoot, input.taskRepoRoot);
89
101
  }
90
- if (active || !input.roundReady) {
91
- return getState(input.baseRepoRoot, input.taskRepoRoot);
92
- }
93
- const preferences = await deps.appSettings.getPreferences();
94
- if (!preferences.autoMemoryEnabled) {
102
+ if (active || !input.roundReady || !input.requestTrigger) {
95
103
  return getState(input.baseRepoRoot, input.taskRepoRoot);
96
104
  }
97
105
  if (deps.isHarnessEngineerAvailable && !(await deps.isHarnessEngineerAvailable(input.baseRepoRoot))) {
@@ -122,6 +130,7 @@ export function createAutoMemoryService(deps) {
122
130
  taskSlug: input.taskSlug,
123
131
  status: "collecting",
124
132
  finalAcceptanceHash,
133
+ trigger: input.requestTrigger,
125
134
  createdAt: timestamp,
126
135
  updatedAt: timestamp,
127
136
  drafts
@@ -138,6 +147,7 @@ export function createAutoMemoryService(deps) {
138
147
  createdAt: timestamp,
139
148
  updatedAt: timestamp,
140
149
  finalAcceptanceHash,
150
+ trigger: input.requestTrigger,
141
151
  beforeHashes: hashMemorySet(before)
142
152
  });
143
153
  await persistActiveState(input.taskRepoRoot, state);
@@ -159,13 +169,15 @@ export function createAutoMemoryService(deps) {
159
169
  return {
160
170
  ready: false,
161
171
  disposition,
172
+ trigger: active.trigger,
162
173
  reason: disposition === "failed"
163
174
  ? "Auto Memory failed for this task. Retry it before Task Harness Retrospective."
164
175
  : `Auto Memory is ${disposition} for this task.`
165
176
  };
166
177
  }
167
- if (await hasCompletedRunForFinalAcceptance(input.taskRepoRoot, finalAcceptanceHash)) {
168
- return { ready: true, disposition: "completed" };
178
+ const completedRun = await findCompletedRunForFinalAcceptance(input.taskRepoRoot, finalAcceptanceHash);
179
+ if (completedRun) {
180
+ return { ready: true, disposition: "completed", trigger: completedRun.trigger };
169
181
  }
170
182
  return {
171
183
  ready: false,
@@ -173,18 +185,6 @@ export function createAutoMemoryService(deps) {
173
185
  reason: "Auto Memory must complete for this Final Acceptance before Task Harness Retrospective."
174
186
  };
175
187
  }
176
- async function assertTaskRetrospectiveReady(input) {
177
- const readiness = await getTaskRetrospectiveReadiness(input);
178
- if (readiness.ready) {
179
- return;
180
- }
181
- throw new VcmError({
182
- code: "TASK_MEMORY_REVIEW_NOT_READY",
183
- message: "Task Harness Retrospective must run after Auto Memory.",
184
- statusCode: 409,
185
- hint: readiness.reason
186
- });
187
- }
188
188
  async function isRoleMemoryTurn(taskRepoRoot, role) {
189
189
  const state = await loadActiveState(taskRepoRoot);
190
190
  const draft = state?.status === "collecting" ? currentDraft(state) : undefined;
@@ -192,6 +192,13 @@ export function createAutoMemoryService(deps) {
192
192
  }
193
193
  async function handleRoleHook(input) {
194
194
  const state = await loadActiveState(input.taskRepoRoot);
195
+ if (!(await deps.appSettings.getPreferences()).autoMemoryEnabled) {
196
+ if (state) {
197
+ await discardActiveReview(input.taskRepoRoot, state);
198
+ return true;
199
+ }
200
+ return false;
201
+ }
195
202
  const draft = state?.status === "collecting" ? currentDraft(state) : undefined;
196
203
  if (!state || !draft || draft.role !== input.role) {
197
204
  return false;
@@ -237,13 +244,17 @@ export function createAutoMemoryService(deps) {
237
244
  }
238
245
  async function handleHarnessEngineerHook(input) {
239
246
  const state = await loadActiveState(input.taskRepoRoot);
247
+ if (!(await deps.appSettings.getPreferences()).autoMemoryEnabled) {
248
+ if (state) {
249
+ await discardActiveReview(input.taskRepoRoot, state);
250
+ return true;
251
+ }
252
+ return false;
253
+ }
240
254
  if (state?.status === "reviewing" && !state.reviewPromptDispatchedAt) {
241
255
  return false;
242
256
  }
243
257
  if (!state || state.status !== "reviewing") {
244
- if (input.eventName === "Stop") {
245
- await captureHarnessEngineerChanges(input.baseRepoRoot, input.taskRepoRoot, input.taskSlug);
246
- }
247
258
  return false;
248
259
  }
249
260
  if (input.eventName === "UserPromptSubmit" || input.eventName === "PostCompact") {
@@ -329,6 +340,10 @@ export function createAutoMemoryService(deps) {
329
340
  }
330
341
  async function assertHarnessEngineerAvailable(taskRepoRoot) {
331
342
  const state = await loadActiveState(taskRepoRoot);
343
+ if (state && !(await deps.appSettings.getPreferences()).autoMemoryEnabled) {
344
+ await discardActiveReview(taskRepoRoot, state);
345
+ return;
346
+ }
332
347
  if (!state || state.status === "failed") {
333
348
  return;
334
349
  }
@@ -341,6 +356,10 @@ export function createAutoMemoryService(deps) {
341
356
  }
342
357
  async function assertNoActiveReview(taskRepoRoot) {
343
358
  const state = await loadActiveState(taskRepoRoot);
359
+ if (state && !(await deps.appSettings.getPreferences()).autoMemoryEnabled) {
360
+ await discardActiveReview(taskRepoRoot, state);
361
+ return;
362
+ }
344
363
  if (!state) {
345
364
  return;
346
365
  }
@@ -437,17 +456,6 @@ export function createAutoMemoryService(deps) {
437
456
  await failReview(taskRepoRoot, state, `Harness Engineer memory result could not be applied: ${errorMessage(error)}`);
438
457
  }
439
458
  }
440
- async function captureHarnessEngineerChanges(baseRepoRoot, taskRepoRoot, taskSlug) {
441
- await ensureTaskMemorySnapshot(deps.fs, baseRepoRoot, taskRepoRoot);
442
- const [before, after] = await Promise.all([
443
- readMemorySet(baseRepoRoot),
444
- readMemorySet(taskRepoRoot)
445
- ]);
446
- if (sameHashes(hashMemorySet(before), hashMemorySet(after))) {
447
- return;
448
- }
449
- await createAppliedRun(baseRepoRoot, taskRepoRoot, taskSlug, "harness-engineer", before, after);
450
- }
451
459
  async function createAppliedRun(baseRepoRoot, taskRepoRoot, taskSlug, source, before, after) {
452
460
  assertCompleteMemorySet(after);
453
461
  const timestamp = now();
@@ -513,6 +521,7 @@ export function createAutoMemoryService(deps) {
513
521
  failedAt: run.failedAt,
514
522
  revertedAt: run.revertedAt,
515
523
  finalAcceptanceHash: run.finalAcceptanceHash,
524
+ trigger: run.trigger,
516
525
  diff: run.diff ?? "",
517
526
  canRevert: run.status === "applied" && !run.revertedAt && Boolean(run.afterHashes),
518
527
  error: run.error
@@ -534,8 +543,11 @@ export function createAutoMemoryService(deps) {
534
543
  return files;
535
544
  }
536
545
  async function hasCompletedRunForFinalAcceptance(taskRepoRoot, finalAcceptanceHash) {
546
+ return Boolean(await findCompletedRunForFinalAcceptance(taskRepoRoot, finalAcceptanceHash));
547
+ }
548
+ async function findCompletedRunForFinalAcceptance(taskRepoRoot, finalAcceptanceHash) {
537
549
  const runs = await listRuns(taskRepoRoot);
538
- return runs.some((run) => run.finalAcceptanceHash === finalAcceptanceHash && (run.status === "applied" || run.status === "reverted"));
550
+ return runs.find((run) => run.finalAcceptanceHash === finalAcceptanceHash && (run.status === "applied" || run.status === "reverted"));
539
551
  }
540
552
  async function loadActiveState(taskRepoRoot) {
541
553
  const statePath = resolveRepoPath(taskRepoRoot, MEMORY_REVIEW_STATE_PATH);
@@ -551,6 +563,10 @@ export function createAutoMemoryService(deps) {
551
563
  async function clearActiveState(taskRepoRoot) {
552
564
  await deps.fs.removePath?.(resolveRepoPath(taskRepoRoot, MEMORY_REVIEW_STATE_PATH), { force: true });
553
565
  }
566
+ async function discardActiveReview(taskRepoRoot, state) {
567
+ await clearActiveState(taskRepoRoot);
568
+ await deps.fs.removePath?.(resolveRepoPath(taskRepoRoot, `${MEMORY_REVIEW_RUNS_ROOT}/${state.runId}`), { recursive: true, force: true });
569
+ }
554
570
  async function readRun(taskRepoRoot, runId) {
555
571
  const runPath = resolveRepoPath(taskRepoRoot, `${MEMORY_REVIEW_RUNS_ROOT}/${requireSafeRunId(runId)}/run.json`);
556
572
  if (!(await deps.fs.pathExists(runPath))) {
@@ -590,7 +606,6 @@ export function createAutoMemoryService(deps) {
590
606
  reconcileTask,
591
607
  getState,
592
608
  getTaskRetrospectiveReadiness,
593
- assertTaskRetrospectiveReady,
594
609
  getFile,
595
610
  updateFile,
596
611
  revertRun,
@@ -629,44 +644,36 @@ function toActiveReview(state) {
629
644
  updatedAt: state.updatedAt,
630
645
  currentRole: state.status === "collecting" ? currentDraft(state)?.role : undefined,
631
646
  drafts: state.drafts,
647
+ trigger: state.trigger,
632
648
  error: state.error
633
649
  };
634
650
  }
635
651
  function buildRoleDraftPrompt(taskRepoRoot, state, draft) {
636
652
  return [
637
- "[VCM Auto Memory Draft]",
653
+ "[VCM Task Harness Review: Memory Proposal]",
638
654
  "",
639
- "The task passed Final Acceptance. Propose only durable, reusable memory supported by this task's evidence.",
655
+ "Use the vcm-propose-memory skill to submit the assigned proposal.",
640
656
  `Task worktree: ${taskRepoRoot}`,
641
657
  `Current shared memory: ${resolveRepoPath(taskRepoRoot, `${MEMORY_ROOT}/shared.md`)}`,
642
658
  `Current role memory: ${resolveRepoPath(taskRepoRoot, `${MEMORY_ROOT}/roles/${draft.role}.md`)}`,
643
659
  `Write the draft to: ${resolveRepoPath(taskRepoRoot, draft.path)}`,
644
660
  "",
645
- "Use this structure:",
646
- "# Memory Draft",
647
- "Decision: update | no-change",
648
- "## Add",
649
- "## Update",
650
- "## Remove",
651
- "## Evidence",
652
- "",
653
- "Do not edit memory files, route messages, or handoff artifacts. Do not record task narrative, temporary state, unverified conclusions, or rules that belong in the harness.",
654
661
  "End the turn after writing the draft."
655
662
  ].join("\n");
656
663
  }
657
664
  function buildHarnessReviewPrompt(taskRepoRoot, state) {
658
665
  const runRoot = resolveRepoPath(taskRepoRoot, `${MEMORY_REVIEW_RUNS_ROOT}/${state.runId}`);
659
666
  return [
660
- "[VCM Auto Memory Review]",
667
+ "[VCM Task Harness Review: Memory Review]",
661
668
  "",
662
- "Review the role drafts and task evidence, then produce the complete next memory set.",
669
+ "Auto Memory is enabled. Review the role proposals and task evidence, then produce the complete next memory set.",
663
670
  `Task worktree: ${taskRepoRoot}`,
664
671
  `Role drafts: ${path.join(runRoot, "drafts")}`,
665
672
  `Current memory snapshot: ${path.join(runRoot, "before")}`,
666
673
  `Write the complete reviewed memory set to: ${path.join(runRoot, "after")}`,
667
674
  "",
668
675
  "Keep only verified, durable, reusable project knowledge. Merge duplicates, remove stale entries, and keep role-specific knowledge in the matching role file.",
669
- "Memory is context, not authority. Keep harness rules and task-specific narrative out of memory.",
676
+ "Do not record task narrative, temporary state, unverified conclusions, or Harness rules.",
670
677
  "Do not edit product code, harness files, the canonical base-repository memory, or review metadata.",
671
678
  "All existing files already exist in the after directory. Edit those files in place and end the turn when review is complete."
672
679
  ].join("\n");
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ import { renderTesterHarnessRules } from "../templates/harness/tester-agent.js";
17
17
  import { renderVcmFinalAcceptanceSkillRules } from "../templates/harness/vcm-final-acceptance-skill.js";
18
18
  import { renderVcmHarnessBootstrapSkillRules } from "../templates/harness/vcm-harness-bootstrap-skill.js";
19
19
  import { renderVcmLongRunningValidationSkillRules } from "../templates/harness/vcm-long-running-validation-skill.js";
20
+ import { renderVcmProposeMemorySkillRules } from "../templates/harness/vcm-propose-memory-skill.js";
20
21
  import { renderVcmReportHarnessIssueSkillRules } from "../templates/harness/vcm-report-harness-issue-skill.js";
21
22
  import { renderVcmRouteMessageSkillRules } from "../templates/harness/vcm-route-message-skill.js";
22
23
  import { submitTerminalInput } from "../runtime/terminal-submit.js";
@@ -142,6 +143,14 @@ const HARNESS_FILES = [
142
143
  ownership: "whole-file",
143
144
  renderRules: renderVcmReportHarnessIssueSkillRules
144
145
  },
146
+ {
147
+ kind: "skill-vcm-propose-memory",
148
+ path: ".claude/skills/vcm-propose-memory/SKILL.md",
149
+ title: "VCM Propose Memory Skill",
150
+ frontmatter: renderSkillFrontmatter("vcm-propose-memory", "Use only when VCM requests a role memory proposal during Task Harness Review."),
151
+ ownership: "whole-file",
152
+ renderRules: renderVcmProposeMemorySkillRules
153
+ },
145
154
  {
146
155
  kind: "agent-gate-reviewer",
147
156
  path: ".claude/agents/gate-reviewer.md",
@@ -77,12 +77,10 @@ export function createRuntimeCoordinatorService(deps) {
77
77
  else {
78
78
  await deps.translationService.stopTask(taskRepoRoot, activeTask.taskSlug).catch(() => undefined);
79
79
  }
80
- await reconcileAutoMemory(repoRoot, activeTask);
81
- if (preferences.autoTaskHarnessReviewEnabled) {
82
- const memoryReadiness = await getTaskRetrospectiveMemoryReadiness(repoRoot, activeTask);
83
- if (memoryReadiness.ready) {
84
- await maybeStartTaskHarnessRetrospective(repoRoot, activeTask);
85
- }
80
+ await reconcileAutoMemory(repoRoot, activeTask, preferences.autoTaskHarnessReviewEnabled ? "auto" : undefined);
81
+ const memoryReadiness = await getTaskRetrospectiveMemoryReadiness(repoRoot, activeTask);
82
+ if ((preferences.autoTaskHarnessReviewEnabled || memoryReadiness.trigger) && memoryReadiness.ready) {
83
+ await maybeStartTaskHarnessRetrospective(repoRoot, activeTask, memoryReadiness.trigger ?? "auto");
86
84
  }
87
85
  return { activeTask, gatewayStatus };
88
86
  });
@@ -169,7 +167,7 @@ export function createRuntimeCoordinatorService(deps) {
169
167
  throw error;
170
168
  }
171
169
  }
172
- async function maybeStartTaskHarnessRetrospective(repoRoot, task) {
170
+ async function maybeStartTaskHarnessRetrospective(repoRoot, task, trigger) {
173
171
  const stateRoot = await deps.getStateRoot(repoRoot);
174
172
  const taskRepoRoot = getTaskRuntimeRepoRoot(task);
175
173
  const roundState = await deps.roundService.getSessionRoundState({
@@ -188,7 +186,7 @@ export function createRuntimeCoordinatorService(deps) {
188
186
  taskSlug: task.taskSlug,
189
187
  taskRepoRoot,
190
188
  handoffDir: task.handoffDir,
191
- trigger: "auto"
189
+ trigger
192
190
  });
193
191
  }
194
192
  catch (error) {
@@ -198,7 +196,7 @@ export function createRuntimeCoordinatorService(deps) {
198
196
  throw error;
199
197
  }
200
198
  }
201
- async function reconcileAutoMemory(repoRoot, task) {
199
+ async function reconcileAutoMemory(repoRoot, task, requestTrigger) {
202
200
  const stateRoot = await deps.getStateRoot(repoRoot);
203
201
  const taskRepoRoot = getTaskRuntimeRepoRoot(task);
204
202
  const roundState = await deps.roundService.getSessionRoundState({
@@ -212,6 +210,7 @@ export function createRuntimeCoordinatorService(deps) {
212
210
  taskRepoRoot,
213
211
  taskSlug: task.taskSlug,
214
212
  handoffDir: task.handoffDir,
213
+ requestTrigger,
215
214
  roundReady: roundState.status === "stopped"
216
215
  && Boolean(roundState.roundId)
217
216
  && roundState.roleRecovery?.status !== "failed"
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ ${renderRoleMemoryRules("architect")}
66
66
 
67
67
  - Plan the full accepted task scope routed by PM.
68
68
  - \`architecture-plan.md\` must describe the complete implementation for that scope.
69
- - Do not create internal delivery stages, task-splitting suggestions, or follow-up scope without explicit PM approval.
69
+ - Do not create internal delivery stages, task-splitting suggestions, or follow-up scope.
70
70
  - Implementation order may be described, but it must not defer requested scope.
71
71
 
72
72
  ### Debug Mode
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ export function renderRootClaudeHarnessRules() {
8
8
  - \`vcm-route-message\` is the only channel for PM-hub dispatch and reporting among project-manager, architect, coder, and tester. Gate Review and tool-role work use their dedicated VCM skills and controllers. Follow the route skill's write-then-stop rule.
9
9
  - Use \`vcm-long-running-validation\` for long-running validation. Follow the background job limits below.
10
10
  - Use \`vcm-report-harness-issue\` when you notice a reusable VCM harness problem. Record feedback; do not contact Harness Engineer directly.
11
+ - Treat \`.ai/vcm/memory/**\` as read-only. Use \`vcm-propose-memory\` only when VCM assigns a memory proposal during Task Harness Review.
12
+ - Only the user may approve scope reduction, skipped required validation, Gate Review skip or override, skipped required docs sync, accepted unresolved task-scope risk, or weakening of baseline Harness rules. PM may record and route the user's approval but cannot grant it.
11
13
  - Project-manager runs \`vcm-gate-review\` unconditionally at every Gate Review trigger point and on VCM Gate Review callbacks; the tool reports the authoritative enable state.
12
14
 
13
15
  ## VCM Harness Scope
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@ Decision: ready_for_review|incomplete|failed
101
101
  - Coder validation is limited to baseline unit-level and fast L0/L1 checks; do not run L2/L3/L4, smoke, integration, or E2E validation unless the role message explicitly assigns a targeted fast L2 check.
102
102
  - Run available L0/L1 validation after implementation.
103
103
  - Compile, typecheck, or L0/L1 failure is the signal to report; predicted failure is not.
104
- - If required compile/typecheck/L0/L1 validation cannot run or cannot complete, write \`Decision: failed\` unless project-manager has recorded an explicit exception; finish implementation and explain the concrete reason in \`coder-completion.md\` and the route message to project-manager.
104
+ - If required compile/typecheck/L0/L1 validation cannot run or cannot complete, write \`Decision: failed\`. If the user explicitly approved continuing without the exact check, record the approval and reason; the approval does not change Coder's decision.
105
105
  - Do not make tests pass by weakening assertions, skipping tests, hardcoding success, bypassing real behavior paths, or adding test-only production behavior.
106
106
 
107
107
  ### Failure Reporting And Continuation
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ You are \`vcm-coder-worker\`, a bounded implementation worker invoked by Coder.
48
48
  - Run assigned L0/L1 checks in the foreground. Worker checks are module-scoped and treated as safe fast validation: never use \`.ai/tools/run-long-check\` or \`.ai/tools/watch-job\`, and the switch-to-skill rule for long commands does not apply inside worker runs.
49
49
  - Do not make tests pass by weakening assertions, skipping tests, hardcoding success, bypassing real behavior paths, or adding test-only production behavior.
50
50
  - Report failure only from missing assigned targets, compile/typecheck failure, assigned L0/L1 failure, or a concrete inability to run assigned-module tests.
51
- - If required assigned compile/typecheck/L0/L1 checks cannot run or cannot complete, update worker state to \`failed\` unless Coder recorded a validation exception in the worker task.
51
+ - If required assigned compile/typecheck/L0/L1 checks cannot run or cannot complete, update worker state to \`failed\`. If the user explicitly approved continuing without the exact check, record the approval and reason; the approval does not change the worker state.
52
52
 
53
53
  ### Git
54
54
 
@@ -38,9 +38,10 @@ You are not part of the task workflow round state.
38
38
  permitted bootstrap edits directly in the active task worktree and commit them
39
39
  yourself.
40
40
  - Retrospective Mode: analyze a completed task for reusable harness problems.
41
- Do not edit harness files; proven repeated findings may update VCM memory.
42
- - Memory Review Mode: review role memory drafts or proven retrospective memory
43
- findings and write only the memory files assigned by VCM.
41
+ Do not edit harness or memory files.
42
+ - Memory Review Mode: when Auto Memory is enabled and VCM starts the memory
43
+ phase of Task Harness Review, review role proposals and write only the review
44
+ output files assigned by VCM.
44
45
  - VCM Feedback Mode: draft VCM product, installer, UI, or fixed-template issue
45
46
  feedback. Do not submit without explicit in-session user authorization.
46
47
 
@@ -50,8 +51,7 @@ You are not part of the task workflow round state.
50
51
  explicitly asks you to apply an approved harness change.
51
52
  - When applying edits, work only in the active task worktree named by VCM. Do not
52
53
  edit the base repository root unless VCM explicitly says so.
53
- - In Proposal Mode, do not edit files. In Retrospective Mode, do not edit
54
- harness files; only the memory exception above may write files.
54
+ - In Proposal Mode and Retrospective Mode, do not edit files.
55
55
  - Commit every applied harness change yourself before ending your turn.
56
56
  - Do not overwrite VCM fixed managed blocks.
57
57
  - Keep project-specific customization outside VCM managed blocks.
@@ -64,18 +64,16 @@ You are not part of the task workflow round state.
64
64
  ## Memory Management
65
65
 
66
66
  - Own VCM-managed project memory under \`.ai/vcm/memory/**\`.
67
- - During an Auto Memory review, verify role drafts against task evidence, merge
68
- duplicates, remove stale entries, and keep role-specific knowledge in the
69
- matching role memory file.
70
- - Keep task narrative, temporary state, unverified conclusions, and harness
71
- rules out of memory.
72
- - A repeated problem confirmed by Task Harness Retrospective may become memory
73
- without collecting new role drafts.
74
- - For a direct user-requested memory correction, edit the current task
75
- worktree's assigned memory file; VCM records and applies the change when the
76
- turn stops.
77
- - When VCM assigns review output paths, edit only those paths. VCM applies the
78
- reviewed memory and records the diff.
67
+ - When Auto Memory is disabled, do not request proposals, start Memory Review
68
+ Mode, or update memory.
69
+ - During VCM-assigned Memory Review, verify every role proposal against task
70
+ evidence, merge duplicates, remove stale entries, and keep role-specific
71
+ knowledge in the matching role memory file.
72
+ - Do not record task narrative, temporary state, unverified conclusions, or
73
+ Harness rules in memory.
74
+ - Edit only the review output paths assigned by VCM. Do not edit
75
+ \`.ai/vcm/memory/**\` directly. VCM applies the reviewed output and records the
76
+ diff.
79
77
 
80
78
  ## Task Harness Retrospective
81
79
 
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  const PROJECT_CODING_STANDARDS_RULES = `This file is the shared project baseline for roles that edit production code or tests.
2
2
 
3
- Project-specific rules may be added outside the VCM managed block when they make the baseline more precise. Do not weaken these baseline rules without explicit project approval.
3
+ Project-specific rules may be added outside the VCM managed block when they make the baseline more precise. Do not weaken these baseline rules without explicit user approval for the exact exception.
4
4
 
5
5
  ## Applies To
6
6
 
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ ${renderRoleMemoryRules("project-manager")}
12
12
  - Route based on the user request, current VCM task state, and existing handoff status.
13
13
  - Do not perform technical analysis; route architecture, implementation, docs, validation, and defect questions to the responsible role defined below.
14
14
  - Do not implement production code directly.
15
+ - PM records and routes user approvals. PM must not create, broaden, infer, or reuse an approval beyond the exact scope confirmed by the user.
15
16
 
16
17
  ### User Communication
17
18
 
@@ -24,11 +25,15 @@ ${renderRoleMemoryRules("project-manager")}
24
25
 
25
26
  PM Managed Mode applies only when the user explicitly asks to complete the current task in this mode.
26
27
 
27
- - PM must drive the task to completion according to the user's request.
28
- - PM must not delay, narrow, reinterpret, skip, or deviate from the requested task without explicit user approval.
29
- - Questions about how to complete the task are managed inside the VCM flow. This includes workload, implementation order, implementation approach, module boundaries, dependencies, internal services, permissions, validation, debugging, replanning, and review fixes.
30
- - Ordinary technical execution questions should be routed to Architect or the responsible role for decision.
31
- - Ask the user only when the task cannot proceed without user intent or real-world authorization: unclear or conflicting requirements, required external accounts/secrets/test environments/data access, real cost, production permission, sensitive data access, durable-doc conflict, or a proven need to change the requested outcome.
28
+ - PM must drive the accepted task to completion through the normal VCM flow.
29
+ - PM must not reduce, defer, reinterpret, skip, or move requested work outside the current task.
30
+ - PM must not use workload, task size, context size, implementation difficulty, dependency choice, refactor need, testing effort, or number of iterations as a reason to ask the user.
31
+ - Technical execution questions are handled inside the VCM flow. PM routes them to Architect, Coder, Tester, or Gate Reviewer according to role responsibility.
32
+ - PM may defer non-blocking user-facing questions until the final user report, but only when continuing does not require user intent, external authorization, or a user-approved exception.
33
+ - Deferred questions remain part of the current task report. They must not become follow-up scope unless the user explicitly creates a new task.
34
+ - PM must pause and ask the user only when the task cannot proceed without user intent or real-world authorization: unclear or conflicting requested outcome, required account/secret/test environment/data access, real cost, production permission, sensitive data access, destructive or irreversible real-world action, durable-doc conflict requiring user choice, or a required user-approved exception.
35
+ - Required user-approved exceptions include skipped required validation, Gate Review skip or override, skipped required docs sync, accepted unresolved task-scope risk, or weakening baseline Harness rules.
36
+ - PM records user approvals exactly as given. PM must not create, broaden, infer, or reuse approval.
32
37
  - When PM asks the user, the flow must stop and wait for the user's explicit instruction before continuing.
33
38
 
34
39
  ### Task Flow Selection
@@ -146,7 +151,7 @@ When Architect, Coder, or Tester reports a confirmed direct user message:
146
151
 
147
152
  - Treat exploratory discussion as non-authoritative unless the report includes explicit user confirmation.
148
153
  - Treat local clarification as task context and continue the current flow when it does not change accepted scope, gates, approval state, or routing.
149
- - Treat confirmed scope, plan, priority, approval, external authorization, or next-route changes as PM-owned decisions.
154
+ - Treat confirmed scope, plan, priority, approval, external authorization, or next-route changes as user-authorized inputs. PM records them and owns only the resulting workflow routing.
150
155
  - If the confirmed message changes accepted task scope, make the scope change explicit before continuing.
151
156
  - If the confirmed message is only a small clarification for the active role, relay it back with Simple User Relay.
152
157
 
@@ -185,13 +190,13 @@ When Architect, Coder, or Tester reports a confirmed direct user message:
185
190
  - If a role completes a coherent slice and the remaining work still matches the current route, dispatch the same role again.
186
191
  - Do not accept workload, session length, or context size as a reason to change the architect plan.
187
192
  - Route back to architect only for technical mismatch with the approved plan, not for workload or session-size reasons.
188
- - Do not advance to the next gate until the current gate is explicitly complete or an approved exception is recorded.
193
+ - Do not advance to the next gate until the current gate is explicitly complete or the exact exception has explicit user approval. A Gate Review exception is valid only when VCM records the user's skip or override action.
189
194
 
190
195
  ### Final Acceptance
191
196
 
192
197
  - Use the \`vcm-final-acceptance\` skill only to close a complete code-delivery flow, including a primary Debug or Architecture Diagnosis flow that produced code changes.
193
198
  - Do not run Final Acceptance for docs-only, validation-only, Communication-only, PR-prep, analysis-only Diagnosis, or any Debug/Diagnosis branch inside another flow.
194
- - Start final acceptance only after Tester, required Gate Reviews, and required docs-sync gates pass or an explicit exception is approved.
199
+ - Start final acceptance only after Tester, required Gate Reviews, and required docs-sync gates pass, or explicit user approval is recorded for each exact exception. Gate Review skip or override is valid only when recorded by VCM from the user's action.
195
200
  - Confirm applicable evidence exists: architecture plan or architecture diagnosis when required, test result, required Gate Review decisions, docs-sync decision when required, unresolved risks, known-issues disposition, and cleanup status.
196
201
  - Check evidence presence, ownership, currency, and explicit result only; do not judge technical design quality, code quality, test adequacy, or documentation correctness during final acceptance.
197
202
  - If final acceptance finds missing evidence, unresolved risk, or required user approval, route it to the responsible role or user before closing the task.
@@ -1,9 +1,19 @@
1
1
  export function renderRoleMemoryRules(role) {
2
+ const proposalRule = role === "harness-engineer"
3
+ ? `Treat \`.ai/vcm/memory/**\` as read-only during role turns. Update memory
4
+ only through VCM-assigned Memory Review output paths or explicit user edits in
5
+ Harness Studio. When Auto Memory is disabled, do not initiate memory proposals,
6
+ reviews, or updates.`
7
+ : `Treat \`.ai/vcm/memory/**\` as read-only. Do not create, edit, or delete
8
+ memory files. Only when VCM explicitly requests a proposal during Task Harness
9
+ Review, use \`vcm-propose-memory\` and write the exact assigned draft path.`;
2
10
  return `### Role Memory
3
11
 
4
12
  Before handling work in a session, read \`.ai/vcm/memory/roles/${role}.md\`.
5
13
  Read it again after context compaction before continuing.
6
14
 
7
15
  Treat memory as accumulated project context, not authority. Verify it against
8
- current code, documentation, and task evidence.`;
16
+ current code, documentation, and task evidence.
17
+
18
+ ${proposalRule}`;
9
19
  }
@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@ ${renderRoleMemoryRules("tester")}
52
52
  - Treat architect-flagged public contracts, migrations, auth, data flow, routing, or dependency changes as inputs for tester-owned validation design.
53
53
  - Record skipped L3 checks in \`.ai/vcm/handoffs/test-report.md\` with the reason.
54
54
  - Treat validation coverage gaps for accepted task scope, changed behavior, or required public contracts as blocking validation issues; \`Test Result: pass\` cannot include them.
55
- - Record only existing, unrelated, non-required project limitations, or PM-recorded validation exceptions as non-blocking coverage notes, and state why they do not affect current task validation.
56
- - If a required validation check is skipped or cannot complete, \`Test Result\` must be \`fail\` unless project-manager has recorded an explicit exception.
55
+ - Record only existing, unrelated, non-required project limitations as non-blocking coverage notes, and state why they do not affect current task validation.
56
+ - If a required validation check is skipped or cannot complete, \`Test Result\` must be \`fail\`. If the user explicitly approved continuing without the exact check, record the approval and reason; the approval does not change Tester's result.
57
57
  - Update \`docs/TESTING.md\` when validation strategy, commands, level mapping, integration/E2E case definitions, selection rules, final-validation cleanup, test gaps, or test expectations change.
58
58
 
59
59
  ### Testing Documentation
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ Review the changed file list only, then classify files:
43
43
 
44
44
  - expected files: directly named by the user request, route message, durable plan, architecture plan, or architecture diagnosis
45
45
  - supporting files: tests, fixtures, generated context, docs, or wiring needed for expected files
46
- - approved deviations: files explained by Replan, tester follow-up, docs-sync, or explicit user / project-manager approval
46
+ - approved deviations: files explained by Replan, tester follow-up, docs-sync, or explicit user approval
47
47
  - unexplained files: files with no traceable reason in the task evidence
48
48
  - high-risk unexpected files: auth, permissions, payment, billing, schema, migrations, data deletion, secrets, dependencies, lockfiles, broad generated artifacts, or broad formatting churn
49
49
 
@@ -55,14 +55,14 @@ High-risk unexpected files require explicit user approval or architect Replan be
55
55
 
56
56
  Check:
57
57
 
58
- - required route was followed, or an explicit exception is recorded
58
+ - required route was followed, or an explicit user-approved exception is recorded
59
59
  - required handoff artifacts exist and are current
60
60
  - architecture plan, Architecture Diagnosis, Replan, or architect follow-up completion is recorded when required by the flow
61
61
  - tester report records \`Test Result: pass|fail\`, validation commands, results, and skipped checks with reasons
62
- - required Gate Reviews are approved, skipped with a recorded reason, or overridden with a recorded reason
63
- - Gate Review enable state is confirmed authoritatively: do not infer that no Gate Reviews were required from an absent or empty \`.ai/vcm/gate-reviews/index.json\`. When Gate Review is enabled, a missing index or a required gate without a recorded decision means the gate was skipped — run the matching command from the \`vcm-gate-review\` skill, including the code source for \`code-diff\`, and do not accept until each required gate returns \`approve\`/\`already_approved\`, \`disabled\`/\`not_required\`, or a recorded skip/override
62
+ - required Gate Reviews are approved, or skipped/overridden through a VCM-recorded user action
63
+ - Gate Review enable state is confirmed authoritatively: do not infer that no Gate Reviews were required from an absent or empty \`.ai/vcm/gate-reviews/index.json\`. When Gate Review is enabled, a missing index or a required gate without a recorded decision means the gate was skipped — run the matching command from the \`vcm-gate-review\` skill, including the code source for \`code-diff\`, and do not accept until each required gate returns \`approve\`/\`already_approved\`, \`disabled\`/\`not_required\`, or a VCM-recorded user skip/override
64
64
  - docs-sync report records docs updated, docs intentionally left unchanged, or required follow-up when docs sync was required
65
- - known issues are either resolved, promoted to durable docs by architect, or explicitly accepted
65
+ - known issues are either resolved, promoted to durable docs by architect, or explicitly accepted by the user
66
66
  - temporary task state is ready to clean after durable facts are promoted
67
67
 
68
68
  ## Decisions
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ This skill is an operating procedure. It does not replace the deterministic VCM
61
61
 
62
62
  - The shared baseline lives inside the VCM managed block and is installer-maintained; do not edit it.
63
63
  - Add project-specific implementation rules outside the managed block (for example under \`Project Coding Standards\`) only when they make the shared baseline more precise.
64
- - Do not weaken the baseline rules without explicit project approval.
64
+ - Do not weaken the baseline rules without explicit user approval for the exact exception.
65
65
  - Keep role workflow rules out of this file; role routing, Gate Review, Final Acceptance, and role-specific handoff rules belong in role definitions or skills.
66
66
 
67
67
  ### \`docs/ARCHITECTURE.md\`
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
1
+ export function renderVcmProposeMemorySkillRules() {
2
+ return `Use this skill only when VCM explicitly requests a memory proposal during Task
3
+ Harness Review and provides an exact draft path.
4
+
5
+ ## Rules
6
+
7
+ - Treat \`.ai/vcm/memory/**\` as read-only. This skill creates a proposal; it
8
+ never edits active memory.
9
+ - Write only to the exact draft path assigned by VCM. The path must be under
10
+ \`.ai/vcm/memory-review/runs/<run-id>/drafts/\` in the active task worktree.
11
+ - If VCM did not provide a draft path, do not create a proposal.
12
+ - Propose only verified, durable, reusable project knowledge supported by task
13
+ evidence.
14
+ - Do not record task narrative, temporary state, unverified conclusions, or
15
+ Harness rules.
16
+ - Do not edit handoff artifacts or route messages from this skill.
17
+
18
+ ## Draft Format
19
+
20
+ \`\`\`markdown
21
+ # Memory Proposal
22
+ Decision: update | no-change
23
+
24
+ ## Add
25
+
26
+ ## Update
27
+
28
+ ## Remove
29
+
30
+ ## Evidence
31
+ \`\`\`
32
+
33
+ Use \`Decision: no-change\` when the completed task produced no qualifying
34
+ memory. End the turn after writing the assigned draft.`;
35
+ }
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "vibe-coding-master",
3
- "version": "0.7.0",
3
+ "version": "0.7.2",
4
4
  "description": "Local GUI session cockpit for Claude Code role sessions.",
5
5
  "type": "module",
6
6
  "files": [