valent-pipeline 0.19.31 → 0.19.32

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "valent-pipeline",
3
- "version": "0.19.31",
3
+ "version": "0.19.32",
4
4
  "description": "v3 multi-agent AI pipeline for software development lifecycle",
5
5
  "type": "module",
6
6
  "bin": {
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ import { dirname, join, isAbsolute } from 'path';
16
16
  import { randomBytes } from 'crypto';
17
17
  import { parse as parseYaml } from 'yaml';
18
18
  import {
19
- runEvidence, pinGate, formatRunTrailer, formatRunDigest, resolveRoot, evidenceDir, latestRun, latestPins,
19
+ runEvidence, pinGate, formatRunTrailer, formatRunDigest, resolveRoot, evidenceDir, latestRun, resolveRunForAssert, latestPins,
20
20
  verifyIntegrity, assertRules, assertRedRules, pinSourceDelta, snapshotFiles, buildProof, utcCompact,
21
21
  latestAssert, collectFailingCases, authenticateBaseline, verifyShipEvidence, sha256Hex,
22
22
  validStoryId, recordStageResults,
@@ -180,6 +180,18 @@ export async function evidenceAssertCmd(options) {
180
180
  process.exit(2);
181
181
  }
182
182
 
183
+ // Required acceptance case ids, read early so the run resolver can bind to the suite that actually
184
+ // carries them when a project multiplexes suites under one label (HARNESS-GAPS 2026-06-18 Gap 2).
185
+ // The full manifest is re-read below for the count/skips rules.
186
+ let requiredCaseIds = [];
187
+ try {
188
+ const mp = options.manifest ? abs(options.manifest) : join(root, 'stories', story, 'output', 'qa-test-spec.manifest.json');
189
+ if (existsSync(mp)) {
190
+ const m = JSON.parse(readFileSync(mp, 'utf-8'));
191
+ if (Array.isArray(m?.cases)) requiredCaseIds = m.cases.filter((c) => c?.kind === 'acceptance' && c?.required !== false && c?.id).map((c) => c.id);
192
+ }
193
+ } catch { requiredCaseIds = []; }
194
+
183
195
  // Resolve the run: explicit --run, else the newest run for the label. Green demands a report
184
196
  // (junit is the verdict's substance); red takes the newest run regardless — "no report at all"
185
197
  // is itself a red-gate input (the weak-red rule judges it).
@@ -195,8 +207,10 @@ export async function evidenceAssertCmd(options) {
195
207
  // No requireReport filter (review 2026-06-10 #5): a suite that crashes before emitting junit
196
208
  // produces the NEWEST run with no reports — filtering it out silently asserted the previous
197
209
  // (green, report-bearing) run instead. The newest run is always the one asserted; a report-less
198
- // failing run now fails loudly via the green (zero cases) + run-integrity rules.
199
- run = latestRun(evDir, { label });
210
+ // failing run now fails loudly via the green (zero cases) + run-integrity rules. resolveRunForAssert
211
+ // additionally binds to the same-SHA run carrying the required cases when suites multiplex one label
212
+ // (Gap 2), preserving the report-less-crash-wins-newest invariant.
213
+ run = resolveRunForAssert(evDir, { label, requiredCaseIds });
200
214
  }
201
215
  if (!run) {
202
216
  // --require-evidence (review 2026-06-10 #37): the graceful no-op exists for pre-evidence
Binary file