universal-physics-tensor 0.7.2 → 0.14.0

package/bin/upt.mjs

@@ -0,0 +1,508 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env node
+/**
+ * upt — a small CLI over the Universal Physics Tensor bridge-inference
+ * suite, for people who don't read TypeScript.
+ *
+ *   upt explain <quantity> [name=value | name] ...
+ *   upt priority
+ *   upt audit
+ *   upt help
+ *
+ * Run from a built checkout (`npm run build`) via `npm run upt -- <cmd>`,
+ * or as an installed command (`npx universal-physics-tensor <cmd>`).
+ */
+import { fileURLToPath } from 'node:url';
+import { dirname, join } from 'node:path';
+
+const here = dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));
+const dist = (...p) => join(here, '..', 'dist', ...p);
+
+let api, analysis, formulaReg, dimSpecMod, prediction, discovery, coverage, simplifyMod;
+try {
+  api = await import(dist('index.js'));
+  analysis = await import(dist('composition', 'bridge-analysis.js'));
+  formulaReg = await import(dist('numerical', 'formula-registry.js'));
+  dimSpecMod = await import(dist('dimensional', 'dimension-spec.js'));
+  prediction = await import(dist('composition', 'bridge-prediction.js'));
+  discovery = await import(dist('composition', 'discovery.js'));
+  coverage = await import(dist('bridges', 'confrontation-coverage.js'));
+  simplifyMod = await import(dist('composition', 'expr-simplify.js'));
+} catch (err) {
+  console.error('Could not load the built package. Run `npm run build` first.');
+  console.error(String(err.message || err));
+  process.exit(1);
+}
+
+const { explainQuantity, CATALOG_GRAPH, M_SUN_KG, composeSymbolic,
+  be42Edge, be16Edge, lawSchwarzschildRadius, be42ViaRsEdge, format } = api;
+const { bridgePriority, attemptDerivation, dimensionalFreedom, dimensionallyDetermines, buckinghamPi, linkageMap, proposeLinkCandidates, proposeOrphanConnectors } = { ...analysis, ...api };
+const { getFormulaParser, getFormulaParserKind, getFormulaDimensionChecker } = formulaReg;
+const { parseDimensionSpec } = dimSpecMod;
+const { predictMissingBridges } = prediction;
+const { rankDiscoveries } = discovery;
+const { auditCoverage } = coverage;
+const { simplifyObservable } = simplifyMod;
+
+const GRAPH = CATALOG_GRAPH;
+
+// ── help ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+function help() {
+  console.log(`upt — Universal Physics Tensor bridge-inference CLI
+
+Usage:
+  upt explain <quantity> [name=value | name] ...
+        Explain how the graph determines a quantity: the identifiability
+        verdict, recovered value, derivation chains, and whether the inputs
+        are dimensionally sufficient.
+        e.g.  upt explain hawking-temperature mass=1.989e30
+
+  upt priority
+        Triage the speculative bridges by structural DECIDABILITY against
+        established physics (Tiers 1-3). NOT a credibility ranking.
+
+  upt audit
+        Try to derive every built-in bridge equation by dimensions: which
+        re-derive as a recognized monomial (with the prefactor recovered),
+        which are decoys, which are dimensionally open.
+
+  upt map
+        Map how the equations LINK: connected components (clusters) of the
+        catalog graph by shared quantities, the anchored core, the link
+        hubs, and the isolated tail.
+
+  upt candidates
+        Propose candidate cross-cluster links (quantities of the same
+        dimension in different clusters) for PHYSICIST REVIEW — a
+        coincidence-heavy surface, not discovered bridges.
+
+  upt predict
+        Project the catalog onto the (scale × force) regime plane and rank
+        the EMPTY regime cells as undiscovered-connection hypotheses
+        (triadic closure). Makes the namesake tensor operational. Review
+        surface, not discovered bridges.
+
+  upt discover
+        VET the link candidates through the inference suite: hypothesise
+        each identification a≡b and test whether it merges disconnected
+        physics, unlocks quantities, and stays numerically consistent.
+        Ranks promising / inert / contradictory.
+
+  upt connectors
+        Of the 20 ISOLATED bridges, which could connect to the anchored
+        core via a same-dimension identification? The structural frontier —
+        same-kind connectors are the motivated set for physicist review.
+
+  upt coverage
+        Audit the catalog's empirical grounding — which bridges are
+        data-confronted vs graph-computable vs encoded-only vs thin — to
+        target the physicist review. Fabricates nothing.
+
+  upt symbolic [--simplify]
+        Compose bridges' SYMBOLIC (AST) forms, not just their numeric
+        evaluators (the Observable contract). Shows the CT-1 / CT-1b chains
+        composed by substitution, dimensionally validated and evaluable.
+        With --simplify, folds the composed AST via MathTS (k_B cancels),
+        re-validated dimensionally + numerically.
+
+  upt eval "<formula>" name=value ...
+        Evaluate YOUR OWN scalar formula (safe — arithmetic only). Knows
+        pi/tau and sqrt/exp/ln/sin/...; any other name must be supplied.
+        e.g.  upt eval "hbar*c^3/(8*pi*G*M*k_B)" hbar=1.054571817e-34 \\
+                       c=299792458 G=6.6743e-11 M=1.989e30 k_B=1.380649e-23
+
+  upt derive <target:dim> <var:dim> ... [--formula "<expr>"]
+        Derive YOUR OWN equation's dimensional form. <dim> is a named
+        dimension (length, time, mass, velocity, ...), a constant (hbar, c,
+        G, k_B, e), or explicit (L^3.M^-1.T^-2). With --formula, also verify
+        it and recover the dimensionless prefactor.
+        e.g.  upt derive period:time length:length gravity:acceleration \\
+                       --formula "2*pi*sqrt(length/gravity)"
+
+  upt help        Show this message.
+
+Run with no arguments for a short demo.`);
+}
+
+// ── explain ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+function parseKnown(args) {
+  const values = {};
+  const names = [];
+  let hasValue = false;
+  for (const a of args) {
+    const eq = a.indexOf('=');
+    if (eq === -1) { names.push(a); continue; }
+    const num = Number(a.slice(eq + 1));
+    if (Number.isNaN(num)) { names.push(a.slice(0, eq)); }
+    else { values[a.slice(0, eq)] = num; hasValue = true; }
+  }
+  return hasValue ? values : names;
+}
+
+function explain(target, rest) {
+  if (!target) { console.error('upt explain needs a quantity name. See `upt help`.'); process.exit(2); }
+  const x = explainQuantity(GRAPH, target, parseKnown(rest));
+  console.log(`\n● ${target}`);
+  console.log(`  ${x.summary}`);
+  if (x.derivations.length) {
+    console.log('  derivations:');
+    for (const d of x.derivations) {
+      const val = d.value !== undefined ? ` = ${d.value.toExponential(4)}` : '';
+      const chain = d.leafInputs.join(',') !== d.sources.join(',')
+        ? `  [from leaves: ${d.leafInputs.join(', ')}]` : '';
+      console.log(`    - ${d.edge} (${d.label})${val}${chain}`);
+      if (d.dimensionalForm) console.log(`        ${d.dimensionalForm.formula}`);
+    }
+  }
+  if (x.blockingFrontier.length) {
+    console.log(`  to determine it, also supply: ${x.blockingFrontier.join(', ')}`);
+  }
+}
+
+// ── priority ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+function priority() {
+  const board = bridgePriority(GRAPH);
+  const a = (d) => (d === Infinity ? '∞' : String(d));
+  console.log('\nBridge triage — structural decidability against established physics');
+  console.log('(review/confrontation priority — NOT a credibility ranking)\n');
+  console.log('   tier  anchor  grounding   cplx  data   bridge                status');
+  console.log('   ' + '─'.repeat(73));
+  let last = 0;
+  for (const e of board) {
+    if (e.tier !== last) {
+      const label = e.tier === 1 ? 'anchored + grounded/tractable — confront first'
+        : e.tier === 2 ? 'anchored OR grounded — second pass'
+        : 'isolated + multi-parameter — needs literature review, not structure';
+      console.log(`\n   ── Tier ${e.tier}: ${label}`);
+      last = e.tier;
+    }
+    console.log('   T' + e.tier, a(e.anchoring).padStart(5), '  ' + e.grounding.padEnd(10),
+      String(e.complexity).padStart(3), e.hasDataConfrontation ? ' DATA' : '     ',
+      ' ' + e.id.padEnd(20), e.status);
+  }
+  const tiers = board.reduce((m, e) => ((m[e.tier] = (m[e.tier] || 0) + 1), m), {});
+  console.log(`\n   Tiers: ${JSON.stringify(tiers)}  (of ${board.length} non-established bridges)`);
+  console.log('   Reminder: tier ranks decidability/anchoring, not truth.');
+}
+
+// ── audit ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+function audit() {
+  const derived = [], decoy = [], open = [];
+  for (const e of GRAPH) {
+    const d = attemptDerivation(e);
+    const c = dimensionalFreedom(e);
+    if (d.status === 'derived') derived.push({ e, d, c });
+    else if (d.status === 'decoy') decoy.push({ e, c });
+    else open.push({ e, c });
+  }
+  console.log('\nDeriving the bridge equations by dimensions');
+  console.log('(form by dimensions; the constant is recovered by matching the evaluator)\n');
+  console.log(`  DERIVED (${derived.length}) — recognized monomial, prefactor recovered:`);
+  for (const { e, d } of derived) {
+    const tag = d.cleanPrefactor ? '' : '  (empirical/tuned constant)';
+    console.log(`    ${e.id.padEnd(22)} +[${(d.subset || []).join(',')}]  ×${d.prefactor.toExponential(3)}${tag}`);
+  }
+  console.log(`\n  DECOY (${decoy.length}) — dimensionally valid but wrong form:`);
+  console.log('    ' + decoy.map((x) => x.e.id).join(', '));
+  console.log(`\n  OPEN (${open.length}) — irreducible free dimensionless group(s); by complexity:`);
+  for (const { e, c } of open.sort((a, b) => a.c - b.c)) {
+    console.log(`    cplx=${c}  ${e.id}`);
+  }
+  console.log('\n  (derivability is ORTHOGONAL to credibility — see the priority command)');
+}
+
+// ── eval (your own formula) ───────────────────────────────────────────────
+async function evalCmd(rawArgs) {
+  const debug = rawArgs.includes('--debug');
+  const args = rawArgs.filter((a) => a !== '--debug');
+  const expr = args[0];
+  if (!expr) { console.error('upt eval needs a formula, e.g.  upt eval "a*b^2" a=2 b=3'); process.exit(2); }
+  const parser = await getFormulaParser();
+  if (debug) console.error(`[parser: ${await getFormulaParserKind()}]`);
+  let cf;
+  try { cf = parser.parse(expr); } catch (e) { console.error('parse error: ' + e.message); process.exit(2); }
+  const scope = {};
+  for (const a of args.slice(1)) {
+    const i = a.indexOf('=');
+    if (i > 0) scope[a.slice(0, i)] = Number(a.slice(i + 1));
+  }
+  const missing = cf.variables.filter((v) => !(v in scope));
+  if (missing.length) {
+    console.error(`missing values for: ${missing.join(', ')}   (free variables: ${cf.variables.join(', ') || 'none'})`);
+    process.exit(2);
+  }
+  try { console.log(cf.evaluate(scope)); } catch (e) { console.error(e.message); process.exit(2); }
+}
+
+// ── derive (your own equation) ─────────────────────────────────────────────
+const fmtMono = (m) => Object.entries(m).filter(([, e]) => Math.abs(e) > 1e-9)
+  .map(([n, e]) => (e === 1 ? n : `${n}^${e}`)).join('·') || '(dimensionless)';
+
+const BASES = ['L', 'M', 'T', 'I', 'Theta', 'N', 'J'];
+const dimsEqualTol = (a, b) => BASES.every((k) => Math.abs((a[k] || 0) - (b[k] || 0)) < 1e-9);
+
+async function derive(args) {
+  let formula = null;
+  let debug = false;
+  const rest = [];
+  for (let i = 0; i < args.length; i++) {
+    if (args[i] === '--formula') formula = args[++i];
+    else if (args[i] === '--debug') debug = true;
+    else rest.push(args[i]);
+  }
+  if (rest.length < 1) { console.error('upt derive needs a target spec, e.g.  upt derive period:time length:length gravity:acceleration'); process.exit(2); }
+  let specs;
+  try {
+    specs = rest.map((a) => {
+      const c = a.indexOf(':');
+      if (c < 1) throw new Error(`'${a}' must be name:dimension (e.g. period:time)`);
+      return { name: a.slice(0, c), dim: parseDimensionSpec(a.slice(c + 1)) };
+    });
+  } catch (e) { console.error('  ' + e.message); process.exit(2); }
+  const target = specs[0];
+  const governing = specs.slice(1);
+  const det = dimensionallyDetermines(target, governing);
+  console.log(`\n● ${target.name}  from {${governing.map((g) => g.name).join(', ')}}`);
+  if (det.determined) {
+    console.log(`  dimensionally determined up to a constant:  ${target.name} ∝ ${fmtMono(det.monomial)}`);
+  } else {
+    const full = buckinghamPi([target, ...governing]);
+    console.log(`  NOT a unique monomial — ${full.piGroupCount} free dimensionless group(s) (${full.verdict}):`);
+    for (const g of full.piGroups) console.log(`     ${g.formula}`);
+    console.log(`  (${det.reason})`);
+  }
+  if (formula) {
+    const parser = await getFormulaParser();
+    if (debug) console.error(`  [parser: ${await getFormulaParserKind()}]`);
+
+    // Dimensional check (Phase 2) — homogeneity + dimension of the user's
+    // formula, independent of whether a unique monomial exists. Always
+    // available (MathTS AST when present, else the built-in parser's AST).
+    const checker = await getFormulaDimensionChecker();
+    const dims = Object.fromEntries(governing.map((g) => [g.name, g.dim]));
+    const r = checker.check(formula, dims);
+    if (!r.ok) {
+      console.log(`  formula dimensional check: ✗ ${r.error}`);
+    } else {
+      const matches = dimsEqualTol(r.dim, target.dim);
+      console.log(`  formula dimension: ${api.format(r.dim)}` +
+        (matches ? `  ✓ homogeneous, matches target` : `  ⚠ homogeneous but ≠ target ${api.format(target.dim)}`));
+    }
+
+    let cf;
+    try { cf = parser.parse(formula); } catch (e) { console.error('  formula parse error: ' + e.message); process.exit(2); }
+    if (!det.determined) { console.log('  formula given, but with no unique monomial there is no single prefactor to recover.'); return; }
+    const ratios = [];
+    for (let j = 0; j < 3; j++) {
+      const scope = {};
+      governing.forEach((g, i) => { scope[g.name] = Math.pow(1.7 + i, 1 + 0.3 * j); });
+      let cand = 1;
+      for (const g of governing) cand *= Math.pow(scope[g.name], det.monomial[g.name] || 0);
+      try { ratios.push(cf.evaluate(scope) / cand); }
+      catch (e) { console.error('  formula uses an undeclared variable: ' + e.message); process.exit(2); }
+    }
+    const mean = ratios.reduce((a, b) => a + b, 0) / ratios.length;
+    const cv = Math.sqrt(ratios.reduce((a, b) => a + (b - mean) ** 2, 0) / ratios.length) / Math.abs(mean);
+    console.log(cv < 1e-9
+      ? `  formula MATCHES the dimensional form — recovered prefactor ≈ ${mean.toExponential(4)}`
+      : `  formula does NOT match the dimensional monomial (different input-dependence — a decoy or different physics).`);
+  }
+}
+
+// ── map (how the equations link) ──────────────────────────────────────────
+function mapCmd() {
+  const m = linkageMap(GRAPH);
+  const mix = (s) => Object.entries(s).map(([k, v]) => `${v} ${k}`).join(', ');
+  console.log('\nCatalog linkage map — how the equations connect via shared quantities');
+  console.log(`(${m.componentCount} components over ${GRAPH.length} edges; ${m.compositions} compose into chains)\n`);
+  for (const c of m.clusters.filter((x) => x.size > 1)) {
+    console.log(`  ● cluster of ${c.size}${c.anchored ? '  [ANCHORED to known physics]' : ''}`);
+    console.log(`     edges:  ${c.edges.join(', ')}`);
+    console.log(`     status: ${mix(c.statusMix)}`);
+    console.log(`     link hubs: ${c.hubs.join(', ')}\n`);
+  }
+  console.log(`  ○ isolated (${m.isolated.length}) — share no quantity with any other edge:`);
+  console.log(`     ${m.isolated.join(', ')}`);
+  console.log('\n  (a structural map — shared-quantity connectivity, NOT a credibility signal)');
+}
+
+// ── candidates (map-proposed links for review) ────────────────────────────
+function candidatesCmd() {
+  const cands = proposeLinkCandidates(GRAPH);
+  const core = cands.filter((c) => c.touchesCore);
+  const ck = cands.filter((c) => c.touchesCore && c.sameKind);
+  console.log('\nLink candidates — cross-cluster quantities sharing a dimension');
+  console.log('⚠ a coincidence-heavy REVIEW SURFACE, NOT discovered bridges. Same dimension is a');
+  console.log('  weak signal; each needs a physicist to accept or (far more often) reject.\n');
+  console.log(`  funnel:  ${cands.length} total  →  ${core.length} touch the anchored core  →  ${ck.length} also same-kind\n`);
+  console.log('  same-kind + core-touching (the least-implausible set):');
+  for (const c of ck) console.log(`    ${(c.a + ' ≟ ' + c.b).padEnd(56)} [${c.sharedToken}]`);
+  console.log('\n  Most are still coincidences (decoherence-rate ≟ hubble-rate) or pairs the catalog');
+  console.log('  deliberately keeps distinct (effective-mass ≠ mass). The genuinely motivated few —');
+  console.log('  e.g. coarsening-length ≟ quantum-correlation-length (links the isolated Model-A');
+  console.log('  coarsening bridge to the Kibble-Zurek criticality cluster) — are written up in');
+  console.log('  docs/research/Linkage-Candidate-Proposals.md.');
+}
+
+// ── predict (empty regime cells as bridge hypotheses) ─────────────────────
+function predictCmd() {
+  const r = predictMissingBridges(GRAPH);
+  const short = (k) => k.replace(/scale=/g, '').replace(/force=/g, '').replace('|', '/');
+  console.log('\nBridge prediction — empty (scale×force) regime cells as undiscovered-link HYPOTHESES');
+  console.log('⚠ STRUCTURAL hypotheses for physicist review, NOT discovered bridges. "Two regimes');
+  console.log('  share bridge-neighbours but are not directly linked" (triadic closure) is a weak prior.\n');
+  console.log(`  projected ${r.placedEdges}/${r.totalEdges} edges onto ${r.occupiedRegimes.length} regimes; ` +
+    `${r.linkedPairCount} regime-pairs already bridged.\n`);
+  if (!r.predictions.length) {
+    console.log('  no empty regime-pair has a shared-neighbour basis — nothing to predict.');
+  } else {
+    console.log('  predicted missing bridges (by shared-neighbour count):');
+    for (const p of r.predictions) {
+      console.log(`    ${(short(p.regimeA) + ' ⟷ ' + short(p.regimeB)).padEnd(46)} ` +
+        `score ${p.sharedNeighbors}  via {${p.via.map(short).join(', ')}}`);
+    }
+  }
+  if (r.unexploredRegimes.length) {
+    console.log(`\n  unexplored regimes adjacent to known ones (the tensor's empty neighbourhoods):`);
+    console.log(`    ${r.unexploredRegimes.map(short).join(', ')}`);
+  }
+  console.log('\n  (regime coords come from quantity attributes; only regime-tagged edges are placed.)');
+}
+
+// ── discover (vet link candidates through the inference suite) ─────────────
+function discoverCmd() {
+  const ranked = rankDiscoveries(GRAPH);
+  const by = (v) => ranked.filter((r) => r.verdict === v);
+  const promising = by('promising'), inert = by('inert'), contra = by('contradictory');
+  console.log('\nDiscovery — link candidates VETTED through the inference suite');
+  console.log('⚠ a REVIEW SURFACE: `promising` means "worth a physicist\'s minute", not "true".');
+  console.log('  Each candidate hypothesises an identification a≡b and tests its consequences.\n');
+  console.log(`  funnel:  ${ranked.length} candidates  →  ${promising.length} promising  ` +
+    `·  ${inert.length} inert  ·  ${contra.length} contradictory (falsified)\n`);
+  if (promising.length) {
+    console.log('  PROMISING (merges disconnected physics, unlocks quantities, stays consistent):');
+    for (const r of promising) {
+      console.log(`    ${(r.a + ' ≟ ' + r.b).padEnd(52)} [${r.dim}]  score ${r.score}`);
+      console.log(`        unlocks: ${r.unlocksFromAnchor.join(', ') || '—'}`);
+    }
+  } else {
+    console.log('  no candidate is `promising` from the default {mass} anchor.');
+  }
+  if (contra.length) {
+    console.log(`\n  CONTRADICTORY (the identification falsifies itself numerically):`);
+    for (const r of contra) {
+      console.log(`    ${(r.a + ' ≟ ' + r.b).padEnd(52)} disagreeing node(s): ${r.inconsistentNodes.join(', ')}`);
+    }
+  }
+  console.log('\n  (numeric check only exercises the anchor-reachable subgraph; weak priors on dimension.)');
+}
+
+// ── coverage (empirical-spine audit) ──────────────────────────────────────
+function coverageCmd() {
+  const r = auditCoverage();
+  console.log('\nEmpirical-spine coverage — where the catalog\'s grounding is thin');
+  console.log('(reads the catalog/graph/confrontation modules; fabricates nothing)\n');
+  console.log(`  ${r.total} bridges by grounding tier:`);
+  console.log(`    data-confronted  : ${r.byTier['data-confronted']}  (real-data confrontation)`);
+  console.log(`    graph-computable : ${r.byTier['graph-computable']}  (graph edge + dimensional signature)`);
+  console.log(`    encoded-only     : ${r.byTier['encoded-only']}  (dimensional signature, no graph edge)`);
+  console.log(`    thin             : ${r.byTier['thin']}  (no dimensional signature)`);
+  console.log(`\n  gaps:  ${r.withoutDataConfrontation} without a data confrontation · ` +
+    `${r.withoutCitation} without any citation`);
+  if (r.thinBridges.length) {
+    console.log(`  thinnest (no dimensional signature): BE-${r.thinBridges.join(', BE-')}`);
+  }
+  console.log('\n  (a targeting tool for the CONTRIBUTING.md physicist review, not a quality score.)');
+}
+
+// ── symbolic (symbolic bridge composition — the Observable contract) ──────
+function exprToString(n) {
+  if (n.kind === 'symbol') return n.name;
+  if (n.kind === 'op') {
+    if (n.op === '^') return `${exprToString(n.args[0])}^${exprToString(n.args[1])}`;
+    const sep = n.op === '*' ? '·' : ` ${n.op} `;
+    const inner = n.args.map((a) => {
+      const s = exprToString(a);
+      return a.kind === 'op' && (a.op === '+' || a.op === '-' || a.op === '/') ? `(${s})` : s;
+    }).join(sep);
+    return inner;
+  }
+  return `⟨${n.kind}⟩`;
+}
+
+async function symbolicCmd(rest) {
+  const doSimplify = rest.includes('--simplify');
+  const chains = [
+    { first: be42Edge, second: be16Edge, label: 'CT-1  (be-42 ∘ be-16, via hawking-temperature ≡ temperature)' },
+    { first: lawSchwarzschildRadius, second: be42ViaRsEdge, label: 'CT-1b (law-r_s ∘ be-42-via-rs, name-match junction)' },
+  ];
+  console.log('\nSymbolic bridge composition — composing the SYMBOLIC forms, not just numbers');
+  console.log('(the Observable contract: composed AST, dimensionally validated + numerically evaluable)\n');
+  for (const { first, second, label } of chains) {
+    const obs = composeSymbolic(first, second);
+    const num = obs.evaluate({ mass: M_SUN_KG });
+    console.log(`  ● ${label}`);
+    console.log(`      composed:   ${obs.name}(${obs.leaves.join(',')}) = ${exprToString(obs.expr)}`);
+    if (doSimplify) {
+      const s = await simplifyObservable(obs);
+      const sNum = s.evaluate({ mass: M_SUN_KG });
+      const tag = s.expr === obs.expr ? '  (unchanged — minimal, MathTS absent, or not reducible here)' : '';
+      console.log(`      simplified: ${s.name}(${s.leaves.join(',')}) = ${exprToString(s.expr)}${tag}`);
+      console.log(`      value @ mass = M_sun:  ${sNum.toExponential(4)}  (= composed, ${format(s.dim)})`);
+    } else {
+      console.log(`      dimension: ${format(obs.dim)}   (validated on the composed AST)`);
+      console.log(`      value @ mass = M_sun:  ${num.toExponential(4)}`);
+    }
+    console.log('');
+  }
+  console.log('  Both compose by AST substitution at the junction and match the numeric composeEdges');
+  console.log('  pipeline to float precision.' + (doSimplify
+    ? ' --simplify folds the composed AST via MathTS (k_B cancels), guarded by re-validation.'
+    : ' Pass --simplify to fold the composed AST via MathTS.'));
+}
+
+// ── connectors (pull isolated bridges into the core) ──────────────────────
+function connectorsCmd() {
+  const r = proposeOrphanConnectors(GRAPH);
+  console.log('\nOrphan connectors — same-dimension identifications that would pull an ISOLATED');
+  console.log('bridge into the anchored core (the catalog\'s structural frontier).');
+  console.log('⚠ A REVIEW SURFACE: same dimension is a WEAK prior; most are decoys (a Förster');
+  console.log('  radius is not a Schwarzschild radius). Same-kind (shared name token) = stronger.\n');
+  console.log(`  ${r.connectedOrphans.length} of the isolated bridges have a same-kind connector; ` +
+    `${r.unconnectedOrphans.length} are truly unconnected.\n`);
+  console.log('  SAME-KIND connectors (the motivated set — orphan ≟ core via shared token):');
+  let lastOrphan = '';
+  for (const c of r.connectors.filter((x) => x.sameKind)) {
+    if (c.orphanEdge !== lastOrphan) { console.log(`    ── ${c.orphanEdge} (isolated):`); lastOrphan = c.orphanEdge; }
+    console.log(`        ${(c.orphanQuantity + ' ≟ ' + c.coreQuantity).padEnd(54)} [${c.dim}]  → ${c.coreEdge}`);
+  }
+  console.log(`\n  truly unconnected (no same-dimension bridge into them): ${r.unconnectedOrphans.join(', ')}`);
+  console.log('\n  Physicist-reasoned ranking + the genuinely-motivated few (e.g. coarsening-length ≟');
+  console.log('  quantum-correlation-length; tunneling-mass ≟ effective-mass) are written up in');
+  console.log('  docs/research/Orphan-Connector-Analysis.md and proposed in spec Part-IX §9.');
+}
+
+// ── dispatch ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+const [cmd, ...rest] = process.argv.slice(2);
+switch (cmd) {
+  case 'explain': explain(rest[0], rest.slice(1)); break;
+  case 'priority': case 'prioritize': case 'triage': priority(); break;
+  case 'audit': audit(); break;
+  case 'map': case 'linkage': mapCmd(); break;
+  case 'candidates': case 'propose': candidatesCmd(); break;
+  case 'predict': case 'predictions': predictCmd(); break;
+  case 'discover': case 'discovery': discoverCmd(); break;
+  case 'connectors': case 'orphans': connectorsCmd(); break;
+  case 'coverage': case 'grounding': coverageCmd(); break;
+  case 'symbolic': case 'compose-symbolic': await symbolicCmd(rest); break;
+  case 'eval': case 'calc': await evalCmd(rest); break;
+  case 'derive': case 'dim': await derive(rest); break;
+  case 'help': case '--help': case '-h': help(); break;
+  case undefined:
+    console.log('upt — bridge-inference CLI. Demo (run `upt help` for usage):');
+    explain('hawking-temperature', ['mass=1.989e30']);
+    priority();
+    break;
+  default:
+    console.error(`Unknown command '${cmd}'. See \`upt help\`.`);
+    process.exit(2);
+}

package/dist/bridges/be23-planckian-confrontation.d.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+/**
+ * BE-23 × overdoped-cuprate Planckian dissipation — the second
+ * real-data confrontation (follows the GW170817 pattern of
+ * `be36-gw170817-confrontation.ts`: observation record with citations,
+ * a `confront` function that recomputes the published comparison, and
+ * honest-finding fields).
+ *
+ * Published dataset: Legros et al. 2019 *Nature Physics* 15:142,
+ * "Universal T-linear resistivity and Planckian dissipation in
+ * overdoped cuprates" (arXiv:1805.02512). The paper measures the
+ * T-linear resistivity slope across overdoped cuprates (Bi2212,
+ * Bi2201, LSCO, Nd-LSCO) and converts it, via the Drude relation
+ * ρ = m* / (n e² τ), into a Planckian scattering coefficient α defined by
+ *
+ *   ℏ/τ = α · k_B T,    finding α ≈ 1 within a factor ~2 (O(1)).
+ *
+ * ── DATA-ENCODING HONESTY LEVEL: AGGREGATE, NOT PER-MATERIAL ──
+ * The per-material α table from Legros et al. was NOT reproduced here:
+ * it could not be re-verified against the paper at encoding time
+ * (network access to arXiv/Nature unavailable), and reproducing table
+ * rows from memory risks fabricating numbers. Per the repo's
+ * no-fabricated-literals rule, this module encodes ONLY the paper's
+ * abstract-level aggregate claim, conservatively stated as
+ * α = 1.0 ± 0.4 (i.e., α is O(1), within roughly a factor of 2 of the
+ * Planckian value α = 1, across the materials studied). Anyone with
+ * the paper in hand can upgrade `PLANCKIAN_CUPRATES` to per-material
+ * rows; the `perMaterialAlphas: null` field is the explicit marker
+ * that this upgrade has not happened.
+ *
+ * ── WHAT IS ACTUALLY CONFRONTED ──
+ * BE-23's evaluator (`evaluateSYKResistivity`) computes
+ *
+ *   ρ(T) = ρ_0 + (m* · k_B T)/(n_e · e² · ℏ) · α_SYK,
+ *
+ * which is exactly the Drude resistivity with the Planckian rate
+ * 1/τ = α_SYK · k_B T / ℏ substituted. So the encoding's α_SYK is the
+ * SAME dimensionless α the paper reports, and the supportable test is:
+ *   1. Is the published α band consistent with the O(1) assumption the
+ *      BE-23 docstring makes for α_SYK? (Operationalized here as the
+ *      factor-2 band [0.5, 2] — OUR reading of "O(1)", not a number
+ *      from the paper.)
+ *   2. Is the evaluator's thermal term algebraically identical to
+ *      (m* / (n_e e²)) · (α k_B T/ℏ), i.e., Drude × Planckian-rate?
+ *      (`encodedFormConsistent`, checked numerically at an arbitrary
+ *      positive parameter point — the parameters cancel structurally,
+ *      so no material data is needed or fabricated for this check.)
+ * NOT claimed: that UPT/SYK *predicts* α (BE-23 bundles α_SYK as a
+ * free O(1) coefficient — status: speculative), nor that agreement
+ * here validates the strange-metal/black-hole bridge framing.
+ *
+ * @module bridges/be23-planckian-confrontation
+ */
+/**
+ * A Planckian-dissipation observation record (aggregate-level).
+ *
+ * @public
+ */
+export interface PlanckianObservation {
+    /** Materials covered by the study (names only — see `perMaterialAlphas`). */
+    readonly materials: readonly string[];
+    /** Aggregate Planckian coefficient α (dimensionless, ℏ/τ = α·k_B T). */
+    readonly alpha_aggregate: number;
+    /** Conservative spread on the aggregate α (dimensionless). */
+    readonly alpha_aggregate_err: number;
+    /**
+     * Per-material {material, alpha, alpha_err} rows. `null` = the
+     * paper's table was NOT reproduced (honesty marker — see module doc).
+     */
+    readonly perMaterialAlphas: readonly {
+        material: string;
+        alpha: number;
+        alpha_err: number;
+    }[] | null;
+    /** 'aggregate' until the per-material table is faithfully transcribed. */
+    readonly encodingHonestyLevel: 'aggregate' | 'per-material';
+    readonly citation: string;
+    readonly honestyNote: string;
+}
+/**
+ * Legros et al. 2019 overdoped-cuprate Planckian-dissipation record,
+ * encoded at AGGREGATE honesty level (see module doc for why).
+ *
+ * @public
+ */
+export declare const PLANCKIAN_CUPRATES: PlanckianObservation;
+/**
+ * The factor-2 band [0.5, 2] used to operationalize the "α_SYK is
+ * O(1)" assumption in BE-23's docstring. This band is UPT's reading of
+ * "O(1)" — it is not a number published by Legros et al.
+ *
+ * @public
+ */
+export declare const PLANCKIAN_O1_BAND: readonly [number, number];
+/**
+ * Result of confronting BE-23 with a Planckian-dissipation observation.
+ *
+ * @public
+ */
+export interface BE23ConfrontationResult {
+    /** Central aggregate α from the observation record. */
+    readonly alphaAggregate: number;
+    /** Spread on the aggregate α (echoed; propagated by the *WithUncertainty sibling). */
+    readonly alphaAggregateErr: number;
+    /** `null` here — per-material rows were not encoded (honesty marker). */
+    readonly perMaterialAlphas: PlanckianObservation['perMaterialAlphas'];
+    /** The O(1) band [0.5, 2] the verdict is taken against. */
+    readonly planckianBand: readonly [number, number];
+    /**
+     * Whether all encoded α values (here: the single aggregate central
+     * value) lie within the O(1) band [0.5, 2] that BE-23's α_SYK
+     * presumes. ±1σ band coverage is the *WithUncertainty sibling's job.
+     */
+    readonly withinPlanckianBand: boolean;
+    /** Planckian scattering rate 1/τ = α·k_B·T/ℏ at temperature T (s⁻¹). */
+    readonly planckianRateAt: (T_K: number) => number;
+    /**
+     * Whether `evaluateSYKResistivity`'s thermal term numerically equals
+     * the Drude form (m* / (n_e e²)) · planckianRateAt(T) — i.e., the
+     * encoded linear-in-T resistivity IS the Planckian-rate Drude
+     * resistivity. Checked at an arbitrary positive parameter point
+     * (structural identity; no material data involved).
+     */
+    readonly encodedFormConsistent: boolean;
+    /** Relative error of the consistency check above. */
+    readonly encodedFormRelErr: number;
+    readonly note: string;
+    readonly observation: PlanckianObservation;
+}
+/**
+ * Confront BE-23's Planckian-dissipation encoding with the published
+ * overdoped-cuprate α band (the framework's second real-data
+ * confrontation, after BE-36 × GW170817).
+ *
+ * @public
+ */
+export declare function confrontBE23(obs?: PlanckianObservation): BE23ConfrontationResult;
+/**
+ * Confrontation result with first-order uncertainty (mirrors
+ * `confrontBE36WithUncertainty`).
+ *
+ * Propagates σ(α) = alpha_aggregate_err only: the Planckian rate is
+ * linear in α (∂rate/∂α = k_B T/ℏ), so σ_rate(T) = σ_α·k_B T/ℏ.
+ * `withinPlanckianBandAtOneSigma` requires the whole ±1σ interval
+ * [α−σ, α+σ] to sit inside [0.5, 2] — the stricter verdict.
+ *
+ * @public
+ */
+export interface BE23ConfrontationWithUncertainty extends BE23ConfrontationResult {
+    /** 1σ on α (echo of alpha_aggregate_err, validated). */
+    readonly alphaSigma: number;
+    /** 1σ on the Planckian rate at temperature T (s⁻¹): σ_α·k_B·T/ℏ. */
+    readonly planckianRateSigmaAt: (T_K: number) => number;
+    /** Whether [α−σ, α+σ] ⊆ [0.5, 2] (stricter than the central verdict). */
+    readonly withinPlanckianBandAtOneSigma: boolean;
+}
+/**
+ * `confrontBE23` + first-order propagation of the α uncertainty.
+ *
+ * @public
+ */
+export declare function confrontBE23WithUncertainty(obs?: PlanckianObservation): BE23ConfrontationWithUncertainty;
+//# sourceMappingURL=be23-planckian-confrontation.d.ts.map