ultra11y 5.45.0 → 5.45.1

package/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
       "name": "ultra11y",
       "source": "./",
       "description": "Automatic accessibility review before commit, push and pull request, plus detailed evidenced Markdown, HTML and per-page WCAG 2.2 AA / RGAA reports in Claude Code.",
-      "version": "5.45.0",
+      "version": "5.45.1",
       "author": { "name": "maxgfr" },
       "homepage": "https://github.com/SocialGouv/ultra11y",
       "repository": "https://github.com/SocialGouv/ultra11y",

package/.claude-plugin/plugin.json

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "ultra11y",
   "description": "Accessibility for WCAG 2.2 AA and country standards (RGAA…): automatic review before commit, push and pull request, plus detailed evidenced Markdown, HTML and per-page conformance reports in interactive agent sessions.",
-  "version": "5.45.0",
+  "version": "5.45.1",
   "author": { "name": "maxgfr" },
   "homepage": "https://github.com/SocialGouv/ultra11y",
   "repository": "https://github.com/SocialGouv/ultra11y",

package/.codex-plugin/plugin.json

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "ultra11y",
   "description": "Accessibility for WCAG 2.2 AA and country standards (RGAA…): automatic review before commit, push and pull request, plus detailed evidenced Markdown, HTML and per-page conformance reports in interactive agent sessions.",
-  "version": "5.45.0",
+  "version": "5.45.1",
   "author": { "name": "maxgfr", "url": "https://github.com/maxgfr" },
   "homepage": "https://github.com/SocialGouv/ultra11y",
   "repository": "https://github.com/SocialGouv/ultra11y",

package/.opencode/plugins/ultra11y.js

@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url";
 // Ownership marker: `ultra11y install --opencode` refuses to overwrite a plugin file that
 // does not carry it, so a user's own ultra11y.js is never clobbered.
 const ULTRA11Y_OPENCODE_PLUGIN = "ULTRA11Y_OPENCODE_PLUGIN";
-const ULTRA11Y_PLUGIN_VERSION = "5.45.0";
+const ULTRA11Y_PLUGIN_VERSION = "5.45.1";
 
 const here = dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));
 

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "ultra11y",
-  "version": "5.45.0",
+  "version": "5.45.1",
   "description": "Audit HTML/CSS/JSX against WCAG 2.2 AA and produce a dated compliance report, or author/review accessible markup (native-HTML-first). A skills.sh agent skill: an install-free static engine (bundled, no npm install) plus the agent's judgment, with check/verify gates against hallucinated non-conformities, and pluggable in-repo standards packs (RGAA France first; Section 508 & EN 301 549 next).",
   "type": "module",
   "packageManager": "pnpm@10.33.0",

package/scripts/ultra11y.mjs

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ import { join as join52, relative as relative6, resolve as resolve17, sep as sep
 import { fileURLToPath as fileURLToPath5, pathToFileURL as pathToFileURL3 } from "url";
 
 // src/types.ts
-var VERSION = "5.45.0";
+var VERSION = "5.45.1";
 var SCHEMA_VERSION = 2;
 var INAPPLICABLE_STATUS = "C";
 
@@ -2298,7 +2298,7 @@ var wcag_universe_default = {
   wcagVersion: "2.2",
   source: "https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/",
   criteriaSource: "https://github.com/w3c/wcag",
-  provenance: "Full WCAG 2.x SC universe (all levels incl. AAA, and the removed 4.1.1 Parsing) fetched from raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/wcag@main on 2026-10-19 via `node scripts/build-standards.mjs --refresh-universe`. Classification: core-AA = ships in src/data/wcag.json (the shipped WCAG 2.2 AA core); out-of-core = WCAG AAA; removed = obsolete (4.1.1).",
+  provenance: "Full WCAG 2.x SC universe (all levels incl. AAA, and the removed 4.1.1 Parsing) fetched from raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/wcag@main on 2026-10-28 via `node scripts/build-standards.mjs --refresh-universe`. Classification: core-AA = ships in src/data/wcag.json (the shipped WCAG 2.2 AA core); out-of-core = WCAG AAA; removed = obsolete (4.1.1).",
   criteria: [
     {
       id: "1.1.1",
@@ -62460,9 +62460,22 @@ function refuteSchema(items) {
 function refuteSystemPrompt(lang = "en") {
   const s = T[lang];
   const setRule = lang === "fr" ? "Pour une conformit\xE9 qui porte `citations`, ouvrez et jugez le faisceau COMPLET : un crit\xE8re transversal n'a pas \xE0 \xEAtre prouv\xE9 par chaque ancre isol\xE9ment." : "For a conformity carrying `citations`, open and judge the COMPLETE evidence set: a cross-cutting criterion need not be proved by each anchor in isolation.";
-  return [s.refuteRole, "", s.supported, s.partial, s.refuted, s.unsupported, "", s.refuteInverted, setRule, s.refuteAttach, s.refuteDoubt, s.refuteNever].join(
-    "\n"
-  );
+  const uncitedRule = lang === "fr" ? "Une conformit\xE9 marqu\xE9e `uncited` ne cite rien : c'est un \xAB non applicable \xBB d\xE9clar\xE9 sur un crit\xE8re dont rien n'a \xE9t\xE9 collect\xE9. Ouvrez les pages audit\xE9es et demandez-vous s'il n'y a VRAIMENT rien de ce dont parle le crit\xE8re ; l'absence de collecte n'est jamais une preuve \xE0 elle seule." : "A conformity marked `uncited` cites nothing: it is a \xAB not applicable \xBB declared on a criterion nothing was harvested for. Open the audited pages and ask whether there is REALLY nothing the criterion is about; an empty harvest is never proof on its own.";
+  return [
+    s.refuteRole,
+    "",
+    s.supported,
+    s.partial,
+    s.refuted,
+    s.unsupported,
+    "",
+    s.refuteInverted,
+    setRule,
+    uncitedRule,
+    s.refuteAttach,
+    s.refuteDoubt,
+    s.refuteNever
+  ].join("\n");
 }
 function conformityClaimsFromAudit(audit2, standard) {
   const claim = (c2) => ({
@@ -62471,17 +62484,21 @@ function conformityClaimsFromAudit(audit2, standard) {
     justification: c2.justification,
     citations: c2.citations
   });
+  const clears = (status) => status === "C" || status === "NA";
+  const seen = audit2.scope?.subjectsSeen ? new Set(audit2.scope.subjectsSeen) : void 0;
+  const needsTrial = (c2, subjects) => (c2.citations?.length ?? 0) > 0 || seen === void 0 || !subjectsAbsent(subjects(), seen);
   if (!isCore(standard)) {
     const pa = audit2.packAdjudication;
     if (!pa || pa.standard !== standard) return [];
-    return pa.criteria.filter((c2) => c2.decidedBy === "agent" && c2.status === "C").map(claim);
+    const pack = loadPack(standard);
+    return pa.criteria.filter((c2) => c2.decidedBy === "agent" && clears(c2.status)).filter((c2) => needsTrial(c2, () => subjectsForPackCriterion(standard, c2.id, getCriterion(pack, c2.id)?.wcag ?? []))).map(claim);
   }
-  return audit2.criteria.filter((c2) => c2.decidedBy === "agent" && c2.status === "C").map(claim);
+  return audit2.criteria.filter((c2) => c2.decidedBy === "agent" && clears(c2.status)).filter((c2) => needsTrial(c2, () => subjectsForSc(c2.id))).map(claim);
 }
 function buildConformityWorklist(claims, startAt = 0, max = VERIFY_MAX) {
   const items = [];
   for (const c2 of claims) {
-    if (c2.verdict !== "C") continue;
+    if (c2.verdict !== "C" && c2.verdict !== "NA") continue;
     const citations = (c2.citations ?? []).map((cite) => ({
       file: cite.file,
       line: cite.line ?? 1,
@@ -62489,8 +62506,22 @@ function buildConformityWorklist(claims, startAt = 0, max = VERIFY_MAX) {
       snippet: cite.snippet ?? ""
     }));
     const primary = citations[0];
-    if (!primary) continue;
     if (items.length >= max) return items;
+    if (!primary) {
+      items.push({
+        n: startAt + items.length + 1,
+        criteriaId: c2.criteriaId,
+        file: "",
+        line: 0,
+        selector: "",
+        claim: (c2.justification ?? "").replace(/\s+/g, " ").trim(),
+        verdict: null,
+        note: "",
+        kind: "c",
+        uncited: true
+      });
+      continue;
+    }
     items.push({
       n: startAt + items.length + 1,
       criteriaId: c2.criteriaId,
@@ -62523,6 +62554,8 @@ var T = {
     conformityPartial: "- `partial` \u2014 elle l'\xE9tablit pour l'\xE9l\xE9ment cit\xE9, mais la justification d\xE9borde sur des cas qu'elle ne couvre pas ;",
     conformityRefuted: "- `refuted` \u2014 l'\xE9vidence n'\xE9tablit pas la conformit\xE9 (elle constate une pr\xE9sence, pas une pertinence) ;",
     conformityUnsupported: "- `unsupported` \u2014 l'\xE9vidence cit\xE9e ne permet pas de trancher.",
+    uncitedScope: "_p\xE9rim\xE8tre audit\xE9 (aucune \xE9vidence cit\xE9e)_",
+    uncitedQuestion: "Rien n'a \xE9t\xE9 collect\xE9 pour ce crit\xE8re et l'agent l'a d\xE9clar\xE9 non applicable. Ouvrez les pages audit\xE9es : n'y a-t-il VRAIMENT rien de ce dont parle le crit\xE8re ? L'absence de collecte n'est pas une preuve \u2014 une page avec du contenu a toujours un ordre de lecture, un ordre de tabulation, du texte \xE0 espacer, une mise en page \xE0 redistribuer ou \xE0 pivoter. `supported` seulement si l'absence est v\xE9rifiable sur les pages.",
     refuteRole: "Vous \xEAtes le SECOND lecteur d'un audit d'accessibilit\xE9. Vous n'auditez pas : vous mettez \xE0 l'\xE9preuve des constats d\xE9j\xE0 \xE9crits. Pour chaque entr\xE9e, ouvrez le fichier \xE0 la ligne cit\xE9e, lisez l'\xE9l\xE9ment, et dites si l'\xE9vidence cit\xE9e \xE9taye la revendication :",
     refuteInverted: "Les entr\xE9es marqu\xE9es \xAB conformit\xE9 revendiqu\xE9e \xBB posent la question INVERSE : l'\xE9vidence \xC9TABLIT-elle le crit\xE8re, ou constate-t-elle seulement que son sujet EXISTE ? Un `alt` pr\xE9sent n'est pas un `alt` pertinent ; un `<title>` pr\xE9sent n'est pas un titre qui d\xE9crit la page.",
     refuteAttach: "V\xE9rifiez aussi le RATTACHEMENT : le r\xE9f\xE9rentiel s\xE9pare l'existence d'une chose et sa pertinence en deux crit\xE8res distincts. Un constat d'absence rang\xE9 sous le crit\xE8re de pertinence est `refuted` \u2014 il est r\xE9el, mais il appartient au crit\xE8re voisin.",
@@ -62556,6 +62589,8 @@ var T = {
     conformityPartial: "- `partial` \u2014 it establishes it for the cited element, but the justification reaches beyond what it covers;",
     conformityRefuted: "- `refuted` \u2014 the evidence does not establish conformity (it observes a presence, not a relevance);",
     conformityUnsupported: "- `unsupported` \u2014 the cited evidence is not enough to decide.",
+    uncitedScope: "_audited scope (no evidence cited)_",
+    uncitedQuestion: "Nothing was harvested for this criterion and the agent declared it not applicable. Open the audited pages: is there REALLY nothing here the criterion is about? An empty harvest is not proof \u2014 a page with content always has a reading order, a focus order, text to space and a layout to reflow or rotate. `supported` only if the absence can be checked on the pages.",
     refuteRole: "You are the SECOND reader of an accessibility audit. You are not auditing: you are putting already-written observations on trial. For each entry, open the file at the cited line, read the element, and say whether the cited evidence supports the claim:",
     refuteInverted: "Entries marked \u201Cclaimed conformity\u201D ask the INVERTED question: does the evidence ESTABLISH the criterion, or does it only show that its subject EXISTS? A present `alt` is not a relevant `alt`; a present `<title>` is not a title that describes the page.",
     refuteAttach: "Check the ATTACHMENT too: the standard splits the existence of a thing and its relevance into two separate criteria. An observation of absence filed under the relevance criterion is `refuted` \u2014 it is real, but it belongs to the neighbouring criterion.",
@@ -62592,7 +62627,8 @@ function formatWorklist(items, semantic, standard = "wcag", lang = "en") {
     for (const it of list) renderItem(it);
   };
   const renderItem = (it) => {
-    out2.push(`- [ ] #${it.n} **${it.criteriaId}** @ \`${it.file}:${it.line}\` (\`${it.selector}\`) \u2014 ${it.claim}`);
+    if (it.uncited) out2.push(`- [ ] #${it.n} **${it.criteriaId}** @ ${s.uncitedScope} \u2014 ${it.claim}`, `      ${s.uncitedQuestion}`);
+    else out2.push(`- [ ] #${it.n} **${it.criteriaId}** @ \`${it.file}:${it.line}\` (\`${it.selector}\`) \u2014 ${it.claim}`);
     if (it.kind === "c" && (it.citations?.length ?? 0) > 1) {
       out2.push(lang === "fr" ? "  - Faisceau complet \xE0 v\xE9rifier ensemble :" : "  - Complete evidence set to verify together:");
       for (const cite of it.citations ?? []) {
@@ -62649,7 +62685,7 @@ var resumableItemKey = (it) => {
 var legacyConformityKey = (criteriaId, file, line, selector, claim) => `${criteriaId}|${canonicalFile(file)}|${line}|${selector}|${claim}`;
 function verifyGroundingInputs(items, fallbackFor) {
   return items.flatMap(
-    (it) => it.kind === "c" && it.citations?.length ? it.citations.map((cite) => {
+    (it) => it.uncited ? [] : it.kind === "c" && it.citations?.length ? it.citations.map((cite) => {
       const fallback = fallbackFor?.(it, cite);
       return { file: cite.file, line: cite.line, selector: cite.selector, snippet: cite.snippet, ...fallback ? { fallback } : {} };
     }) : [{ file: it.file, line: it.line, selector: it.selector, snippet: it.snippet }]
@@ -64127,14 +64163,6 @@ function blankItem(criteriaId, automatability2, title, harvested, limits, signal
     decidedBy: "agent"
   };
 }
-var subjectsForSc2 = (sc) => SC_SUBJECTS[sc] ?? [];
-function subjectsForPackCriterion2(standard, id, scs) {
-  const own = PACK_SUBJECTS[standard]?.[id];
-  if (own) return own;
-  const out2 = [];
-  for (const sc of scs) for (const subject of subjectsForSc2(sc)) if (!out2.includes(subject)) out2.push(subject);
-  return out2;
-}
 function packResultNeedsAdjudication(pc, criterion) {
   if (pc.status === "manual") return true;
   return isProvisionalJudgmentInapplicable(pc, criterion);
@@ -64188,7 +64216,7 @@ function buildAdjudicationWorklist(audit2, opts = {}) {
         // locales are not the UI frame's `Lang`: casting one to the other to satisfy a
         // signature would be asserting something about a country standard that is not true.
         crit ? localize(pack, crit.titlePlain, pack.defaultLocale) : void 0,
-        harvestSubjects(subjectsForPackCriterion2(standard, pc.id, scs), docs),
+        harvestSubjects(subjectsForPackCriterion(standard, pc.id, scs), docs),
         limits,
         (pc.candidateFindings ?? []).map((finding) => ({
           ruleId: finding.ruleId,
@@ -64218,7 +64246,7 @@ function buildAdjudicationWorklist(audit2, opts = {}) {
     });
   }
   return audit2.residualRisks.map(
-    (r) => blankItem(r.criteriaId, r.automatability, scTitle(r.criteriaId) ?? void 0, harvestSubjects(subjectsForSc2(r.criteriaId), docs), limits)
+    (r) => blankItem(r.criteriaId, r.automatability, scTitle(r.criteriaId) ?? void 0, harvestSubjects(subjectsForSc(r.criteriaId), docs), limits)
   );
 }
 function evidenceForCriteria(audit2, criteriaIds, opts = {}) {
@@ -64231,7 +64259,7 @@ function evidenceForCriteria(audit2, criteriaIds, opts = {}) {
   for (const id of criteriaIds) {
     if (out2.has(id)) continue;
     const crit = pack ? getCriterion(pack, id) : void 0;
-    const subjects = pack && standard ? subjectsForPackCriterion2(standard, id, crit?.wcag ?? []) : subjectsForSc2(id);
+    const subjects = pack && standard ? subjectsForPackCriterion(standard, id, crit?.wcag ?? []) : subjectsForSc(id);
     let evidence = collapse2(harvestSubjects(subjects, docs), limits).evidence;
     if (!evidence.length) evidence = candidateFindingEvidence(candidates2.get(id) ?? [], limits.maxClasses);
     out2.set(id, evidence);
@@ -64511,7 +64539,7 @@ function applyAdjudication(audit2, adj, opts = {}) {
         if (v === "C") {
           blame(
             it.criteriaId,
-            `criterion ${it.criteriaId}: a C verdict needs evidence to cite, and none was harvested for this criterion \u2014 record "manual" (reason "undecidable"), or "NA" if nothing in scope is concerned`
+            `criterion ${it.criteriaId}: a C verdict needs evidence to cite, and none was harvested for this criterion \u2014 record "manual" (reason "undecidable"); "NA" only if the scope provably contains nothing the criterion is about \u2014 an uncited NA is put on trial by verify`
           );
         }
       } else if (cites.length === 0 && (v === "C" || v === "NA")) {
@@ -64847,7 +64875,7 @@ var T2 = {
       "- `NA` \u2014 not applicable (fill `justification`; when evidence is presented, cite it too in `citations[]` to say which items are out of scope);",
       "- `manual` \u2014 not statically decidable (fill `reason`: `needs-rendered-dom` \u2192 `scan`, or `undecidable`)."
     ],
-    rule: "> Report NC only if a precise test of the active standard fails \u2014 cite it (`normativeRef`). A good practice without a normative test is a recommendation (`recommendations[]`, non-normative). A purely UX concern is neither.\n>\n> A `C` is cited the same way an NC is: name the evidence you cleared in `citations[]`. **A criterion presented with no evidence at all cannot be `C`** \u2014 record `manual` (`undecidable`), or `NA` if nothing in scope is concerned.",
+    rule: "> Report NC only if a precise test of the active standard fails \u2014 cite it (`normativeRef`). A good practice without a normative test is a recommendation (`recommendations[]`, non-normative). A purely UX concern is neither.\n>\n> A `C` is cited the same way an NC is: name the evidence you cleared in `citations[]`. **A criterion presented with no evidence at all cannot be `C`** \u2014 record `manual` (`undecidable`), or `NA` only if the scope provably contains nothing the criterion is about. No harvested evidence is NOT that proof: a page with content always has a reading order, a focus order, text to space and a layout to reflow or rotate \u2014 an uncited NA is put on trial by `verify`.",
     then: "Then: `ultra11y verify --apply ADJUDICATE.todo.json --in <audit.json> --out <dir>` (fails if any verdict lacks its justification, citations, finding or reason).",
     evidence: "Evidence",
     classes: "distinct content classes",
@@ -65148,11 +65176,13 @@ var WITHDRAWN = /* @__PURE__ */ new Set(["refuted", "unsupported"]);
 var REASON = {
   fr: {
     nc: "Non-conformit\xE9 r\xE9fut\xE9e \xE0 la contre-expertise : le constat ne tient pas sur l'\xE9l\xE9ment cit\xE9. Le crit\xE8re retourne \xAB \xE0 \xE9valuer \xBB \u2014 r\xE9futer une non-conformit\xE9 n'\xE9tablit pas la conformit\xE9.",
-    c: "Conformit\xE9 revendiqu\xE9e non \xE9tay\xE9e \xE0 la contre-expertise : l'\xE9vidence cit\xE9e constate une pr\xE9sence, pas une conformit\xE9. Le crit\xE8re retourne \xAB \xE0 \xE9valuer \xBB \u2014 il ne devient PAS une non-conformit\xE9."
+    c: "Conformit\xE9 revendiqu\xE9e non \xE9tay\xE9e \xE0 la contre-expertise : l'\xE9vidence cit\xE9e constate une pr\xE9sence, pas une conformit\xE9. Le crit\xE8re retourne \xAB \xE0 \xE9valuer \xBB \u2014 il ne devient PAS une non-conformit\xE9.",
+    na: "\xAB Non applicable \xBB non \xE9tay\xE9 \xE0 la contre-expertise : rien n'avait \xE9t\xE9 collect\xE9, et l'absence de collecte ne prouve pas que le p\xE9rim\xE8tre ne contient rien de concern\xE9. Le crit\xE8re retourne \xAB \xE0 \xE9valuer \xBB \u2014 il ne devient PAS une non-conformit\xE9."
   },
   en: {
     nc: "Non-conformity refuted on review: the observation does not hold on the cited element. The criterion goes back to \u201Cto assess\u201D \u2014 refuting a non-conformity does not establish conformity.",
-    c: "Claimed conformity unsupported on review: the cited evidence observes a presence, not a conformity. The criterion goes back to \u201Cto assess\u201D \u2014 it does NOT become a non-conformity."
+    c: "Claimed conformity unsupported on review: the cited evidence observes a presence, not a conformity. The criterion goes back to \u201Cto assess\u201D \u2014 it does NOT become a non-conformity.",
+    na: "\u201CNot applicable\u201D unsupported on review: nothing had been harvested, and an empty harvest does not prove the scope holds nothing concerned. The criterion goes back to \u201Cto assess\u201D \u2014 it does NOT become a non-conformity."
   }
 };
 var key = (file, line, selector) => `${file.trim()}|${line}|${(selector ?? "").trim()}`;
@@ -65163,10 +65193,13 @@ function pruneRefuted(audit2, standard, items, lang = "en") {
   const withdrawn = items.filter((it) => WITHDRAWN.has((it.verdict ?? "").trim().toLowerCase()));
   const removedNc = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map();
   const withdrawnC = /* @__PURE__ */ new Set();
+  const withdrawnUncited = /* @__PURE__ */ new Set();
   const notes = /* @__PURE__ */ new Map();
   for (const it of withdrawn) {
-    if (it.kind === "c") withdrawnC.add(it.criteriaId);
-    else (removedNc.get(it.criteriaId) ?? removedNc.set(it.criteriaId, /* @__PURE__ */ new Set()).get(it.criteriaId)).add(key(it.file, it.line, it.selector));
+    if (it.kind === "c") {
+      withdrawnC.add(it.criteriaId);
+      if (it.uncited) withdrawnUncited.add(it.criteriaId);
+    } else (removedNc.get(it.criteriaId) ?? removedNc.set(it.criteriaId, /* @__PURE__ */ new Set()).get(it.criteriaId)).add(key(it.file, it.line, it.selector));
     if (it.note?.trim()) {
       const criterionNotes = notes.get(it.criteriaId) ?? [];
       if (!criterionNotes.includes(it.note.trim())) criterionNotes.push(it.note.trim());
@@ -65205,7 +65238,7 @@ function pruneRefuted(audit2, standard, items, lang = "en") {
     if (withdrawnC.has(rec.id) && isAgent) {
       acted.add(rec.id);
       clearedConformities.push(rec.id);
-      setOpen(withReview(rec.id, reason.c));
+      setOpen(withReview(rec.id, withdrawnUncited.has(rec.id) ? reason.na : reason.c));
     }
   };
   if (!isCore(standard) && next.packAdjudication?.standard === standard) {
@@ -65490,7 +65523,7 @@ import { delimiter, join as join36 } from "path";
 
 // src/verdict-rules.ts
 var VERDICT_KINDS = `Rule it (the apply gate is FAIL-CLOSED \u2014 a verdict missing its required field does not fold, and its criterion goes back to \xAB to assess \xBB carrying the refusal):
-   - \`C\` (conforming) \u2014 REQUIRES \`justification\` explaining why the evidence satisfies the criterion, AND \`citations[]\` naming the evidence you cleared (\`file\`/\`line\` copied VERBATIM from this criterion's own evidence; an anchor that is not in that list is treated as fabricated). A criterion presented with NO evidence at all cannot be \`C\` \u2014 it is \`manual\` (\`undecidable\`), or \`NA\` if nothing in scope is concerned.
+   - \`C\` (conforming) \u2014 REQUIRES \`justification\` explaining why the evidence satisfies the criterion, AND \`citations[]\` naming the evidence you cleared (\`file\`/\`line\` copied VERBATIM from this criterion's own evidence; an anchor that is not in that list is treated as fabricated). A criterion presented with NO evidence at all cannot be \`C\` \u2014 it is \`manual\` (\`undecidable\`), or \`NA\` only if the scope provably contains nothing the criterion is about. No harvested evidence is NOT that proof: a page with content always has a reading order, a focus order, text to space and a layout to reflow or rotate \u2014 an uncited NA is put on trial by \`verify\`.
    - \`NC\` (non-conforming) \u2014 REQUIRES \`findings\`: at least one groundable \`{ file, line, selector?, message, snippet?, severity?, normativeRef }\` pointing at REAL source. The fold re-grounds every finding; an invented file:line is rejected, and so is a finding with no \`file\` at all. \`normativeRef\` MUST cite the precise failed test \u2014 under a country standard, one of the criterion's OWN numbered tests, listed in its brief under \xAB tests to rule on \xBB. A WCAG id looks alike, denotes an unrelated test, and is rejected.
    - \`NA\` (not applicable) \u2014 REQUIRES \`justification\`, AND \`citations[]\` whenever evidence WAS presented, to say which of those items fall outside the criterion's scope.
    - \`manual\` (still undecidable) \u2014 REQUIRES \`reason\`: \`needs-rendered-dom\` (only a rendered DOM can decide it, and no capture in this run carries its subject) or \`undecidable\` (the evidence cannot settle it either way).`;
@@ -71759,7 +71792,7 @@ For EACH of your criteria:
 1. Read its worklist entry for the EVIDENCE: \`evidence[]\` holds source-anchored excerpts (\`file\`, \`line\`, \`selector\`, \`snippet\`) harvested from the audited code \u2014 open the cited files at the cited lines whenever the snippet alone cannot decide.
 1b. Read \`${join48(runAbs, "adjudicate")}/<criteriaId>.md\` for the CRITERION ITSELF \u2014 its official wording, its numbered tests with the standard's own test methodology, the technical note, the particular cases and the glossary terms the tests are defined in terms of. The worklist JSON carries none of that: it holds the evidence and the slots your verdict goes into, and ruling on a country standard from the criterion's title alone is how a verdict ends up citing a test it never read. That brief also cites the standard's official page for the criterion: if a wording stays ambiguous and you have a web tool, you MAY read that page to settle it \u2014 never to contradict the vendored text, and a web page is never a \`normativeRef\`.
 2. Rule it (the apply gate is FAIL-CLOSED \u2014 a verdict missing its required field does not fold):
-   - \`C\` (conforming) \u2014 REQUIRES \`justification\` explaining why the evidence satisfies the criterion, AND \`citations[]\` naming the evidence you cleared (\`file\`/\`line\` copied VERBATIM from this item's own \`evidence[]\`; an anchor that is not in that list is treated as fabricated). A criterion whose \`evidence[]\` is empty cannot be \`C\` at all \u2014 it is \`manual\` (\`undecidable\`), or \`NA\` if nothing in scope is concerned.
+   - \`C\` (conforming) \u2014 REQUIRES \`justification\` explaining why the evidence satisfies the criterion, AND \`citations[]\` naming the evidence you cleared (\`file\`/\`line\` copied VERBATIM from this item's own \`evidence[]\`; an anchor that is not in that list is treated as fabricated). A criterion whose \`evidence[]\` is empty cannot be \`C\` at all \u2014 it is \`manual\` (\`undecidable\`), or \`NA\` only if the scope provably contains nothing the criterion is about. No harvested evidence is NOT that proof: a page with content always has a reading order, a focus order, text to space and a layout to reflow or rotate \u2014 an uncited NA is put on trial by \`verify\`.
    - \`NC\` (non-conforming) \u2014 REQUIRES \`findings\`: at least one groundable \`{ file, line, selector?, message, snippet?, severity?, normativeRef }\` pointing at REAL source. The fold re-grounds every finding; an invented file:line is rejected. \`normativeRef\` MUST cite the precise failed test \u2014 under a country standard, one of the item's OWN tests, which its brief lists for you under \xAB tests to rule on \xBB. A WCAG id looks alike, denotes an unrelated test, and is rejected.
    - \`NA\` (not applicable) \u2014 REQUIRES \`justification\`, AND \`citations[]\` whenever evidence WAS presented, to say which of those items fall outside the criterion's scope.
    - \`manual\` (still undecidable) \u2014 REQUIRES \`reason\`: \`needs-rendered-dom\` (only a rendered DOM can decide, e.g. computed contrast) or \`undecidable\` (the evidence cannot settle it either way).

package/scripts/vendor/wcag-2.2-fr.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "source": "https://www.w3.org/Translations/WCAG22-fr/",
-  "fetchedAt": "2026-10-19",
+  "fetchedAt": "2026-10-28",
   "principles": {
     "1": "Perceptible",
     "2": "Utilisable",

package/scripts/vendor/wcag-2.2-sc-universe.json

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
   "wcagVersion": "2.2",
   "source": "https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/",
   "criteriaSource": "https://github.com/w3c/wcag",
-  "provenance": "Full WCAG 2.x SC universe (all levels incl. AAA, and the removed 4.1.1 Parsing) fetched from raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/wcag@main on 2026-10-19 via `node scripts/build-standards.mjs --refresh-universe`. Classification: core-AA = ships in src/data/wcag.json (the shipped WCAG 2.2 AA core); out-of-core = WCAG AAA; removed = obsolete (4.1.1).",
+  "provenance": "Full WCAG 2.x SC universe (all levels incl. AAA, and the removed 4.1.1 Parsing) fetched from raw.githubusercontent.com/w3c/wcag@main on 2026-10-28 via `node scripts/build-standards.mjs --refresh-universe`. Classification: core-AA = ships in src/data/wcag.json (the shipped WCAG 2.2 AA core); out-of-core = WCAG AAA; removed = obsolete (4.1.1).",
   "principles": [
     {
       "number": 1,

package/scripts/vendor/wcag-2.2-techniques.json

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
   "source": "https://github.com/w3c/wcag",
   "understanding": "https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG22/Understanding/",
   "license": "W3C Document License (code samples: W3C Software License)",
-  "fetchedAt": "2026-10-19",
+  "fetchedAt": "2026-10-28",
   "criteria": {
     "1.1.1": {
       "slug": "non-text-content",

package/scripts/vendor/wcag-2.2-text.json

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "source": "https://github.com/w3c/wcag",
   "license": "W3C Document License",
-  "fetchedAt": "2026-10-19",
+  "fetchedAt": "2026-10-28",
   "criteria": {
     "1.1.1": "All non-text content that is presented to the user has a text alternative that serves the equivalent purpose, except for the situations listed below.\nControls, Input:\nIf non-text content is a control or accepts user input, then it has a name that describes its purpose. (Refer to Success Criterion 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value for additional requirements for controls and content that accepts user input.)\nTime-Based Media:\nIf non-text content is time-based media, then text alternatives at least provide descriptive identification of the non-text content. (Refer to Guideline 1.2 for additional requirements for media.)\nTest:\nIf non-text content is a test or exercise that would be invalid if presented in text, then text alternatives at least provide descriptive identification of the non-text content.\nSensory:\nIf non-text content is primarily intended to create a specific sensory experience, then text alternatives at least provide descriptive identification of the non-text content.\nCAPTCHA:\nIf the purpose of non-text content is to confirm that content is being accessed by a person rather than a computer, then text alternatives that identify and describe the purpose of the non-text content are provided, and alternative forms of CAPTCHA using output modes for different types of sensory perception are provided to accommodate different disabilities.\nDecoration, Formatting, Invisible:\nIf non-text content is pure decoration, is used only for visual formatting, or is not presented to users, then it is implemented in a way that it can be ignored by assistive technology.",
     "1.2.1": "For prerecorded audio-only and prerecorded video-only media, the following are true, except when the audio or video is a media alternative for text and is clearly labeled as such:\nPrerecorded Audio-only:\nAn alternative for time-based media is provided that presents equivalent information for prerecorded audio-only content.\nPrerecorded Video-only:\nEither an alternative for time-based media or an audio track is provided that presents equivalent information for prerecorded video-only content.",

package/skills/review-a11y/SKILL.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ name: review-a11y
 description: "Use to REVIEW changed frontend code for accessibility: staged files, a working diff, branch, or PR; prompts such as 'review a11y', 'is this accessible?', or 'anything to fix before merge?'; and hook or CI findings on a change. Run the bundled install-free engine with cross-file JSX/TSX analysis, then adjudicate candidates and return a severity-ranked WCAG 2.2 AA review with file:line fixes, residual rendering risks, and a verdict. Use `ultra11y` instead for whole-repo audits, dated conformance reports, country standards, PRD backlogs, or authoring accessible markup."
 license: MIT
 metadata:
-  version: 5.45.0
+  version: 5.45.1
 ---
 
 # review-a11y — accessibility review of changed code