ultra11y 5.26.0 → 5.27.0

package/.claude-plugin/marketplace.json

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
       "name": "ultra11y",
       "source": "./",
       "description": "Automatic accessibility review of the code under change before every commit, push and pull request, plus full WCAG 2.2 AA / RGAA audits and conformance deliverables on demand.",
-      "version": "5.26.0",
+      "version": "5.27.0",
       "author": { "name": "maxgfr" },
       "homepage": "https://github.com/maxgfr/ultra11y",
       "repository": "https://github.com/maxgfr/ultra11y",

package/.claude-plugin/plugin.json

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "ultra11y",
   "description": "Accessibility for WCAG 2.2 AA and country standards (RGAA…): an automatic review of the code under change before every commit, push and pull request, plus full audits and conformance deliverables on demand.",
-  "version": "5.26.0",
+  "version": "5.27.0",
   "author": { "name": "maxgfr" },
   "homepage": "https://github.com/maxgfr/ultra11y",
   "repository": "https://github.com/maxgfr/ultra11y",

package/.codex-plugin/plugin.json

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 {
   "name": "ultra11y",
   "description": "Accessibility for WCAG 2.2 AA and country standards (RGAA…): an automatic review of the code under change before every commit, push and pull request, plus full audits and conformance deliverables on demand.",
-  "version": "5.26.0",
+  "version": "5.27.0",
   "author": { "name": "maxgfr", "url": "https://github.com/maxgfr" },
   "homepage": "https://github.com/maxgfr/ultra11y",
   "repository": "https://github.com/maxgfr/ultra11y",

package/.opencode/plugins/ultra11y.js

@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url";
 // Ownership marker: `ultra11y install --opencode` refuses to overwrite a plugin file that
 // does not carry it, so a user's own ultra11y.js is never clobbered.
 const ULTRA11Y_OPENCODE_PLUGIN = "ULTRA11Y_OPENCODE_PLUGIN";
-const ULTRA11Y_PLUGIN_VERSION = "5.26.0";
+const ULTRA11Y_PLUGIN_VERSION = "5.27.0";
 
 const here = dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url));
 

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "ultra11y",
-  "version": "5.26.0",
+  "version": "5.27.0",
   "description": "Audit HTML/CSS/JSX against WCAG 2.2 AA and produce a dated compliance report, or author/review accessible markup (native-HTML-first). A skills.sh agent skill: an install-free static engine (bundled, no npm install) plus the agent's judgment, with check/verify gates against hallucinated non-conformities, and pluggable in-repo standards packs (RGAA France first; Section 508 & EN 301 549 next).",
   "type": "module",
   "packageManager": "pnpm@10.33.0",

package/scripts/ultra11y.mjs

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ import { join as join51, relative as relative5, resolve as resolve16, sep as sep
 import { fileURLToPath as fileURLToPath5, pathToFileURL as pathToFileURL3 } from "url";
 
 // src/types.ts
-var VERSION = "5.26.0";
+var VERSION = "5.27.0";
 var SCHEMA_VERSION = 2;
 var INAPPLICABLE_STATUS = "C";
 
@@ -45061,14 +45061,42 @@ var SUBJECTS = {
       (e) => h(d, e, `<${e.tag} autoplay=${attr(e, "autoplay") !== void 0} controls=${attr(e, "controls") !== void 0}>`, `media|${e.tag}`)
     )
   ]),
-  // A change of context triggered by focus or by changing a value.
-  // RGAA 7.4 / WCAG 3.2.1-3.2.2. The handlers are half the subject; the OTHER half is what a
-  // script does once it runs, and that is where a context change actually happens: submitting a
-  // form, navigating, opening a window. Looking only for onFocus/onBlur/onChange left the
-  // criterion with an empty harvest on any codebase that binds its handlers in JavaScript
-  // rather than in markup — which is most of them — and an empty harvest is a criterion the
-  // adjudicator can only guess at.
+  // A change of context initiated by a script. RGAA 7.4 / WCAG 3.2.1-3.2.2.
+  //
+  // THE SUBJECT IS THE SCRIPT, and getting that wrong cost a release. This used to be a list of
+  // CONSEQUENCES — onFocus/onBlur/onChange, `.submit(`, `location`, `router.push`,
+  // `window.open` — on the theory that a context change is one of them. It is, but the list can
+  // only ever be the ways we have already seen a script change context, and a criterion whose
+  // subject is « each script » cannot be answered from a catalogue of endings.
+  //
+  // Measured on tests/fixtures/realworld, which ships LoginForm.tsx whose form carries
+  // `onSubmit={(e) => { e.preventDefault(); … }}`: 7.4 reached the adjudicator with population
+  // ZERO. A script was right there, doing the thing the criterion asks about, and the harvest
+  // walked past it because `onSubmit` was not on the list. The adjudicator was told « no
+  // evidence » and billed to guess between NA and manual — on a page it should have been handed
+  // twenty lines of React to read.
+  //
+  // So it collects the script FIRST: any `<script>`, any `on*` binding whatever the event, and
+  // then the consequences it always looked for, which stay because they are what an adjudicator
+  // most needs pointed out. Two things follow. A page with a script always arrives with it, so
+  // the verdict is made on the code rather than on its absence. And a page with no script at all
+  // harvests nothing — which is now a FACT about the code, not a gap in a pattern list, so 7.4
+  // and 3.2.1/3.2.2 close as « not applicable » with no model in the loop (EXISTENCE_SUBJECTS).
   contextChange: (docs) => docs.flatMap((d) => [
+    // The script itself — the subject, before anything it goes on to do.
+    ...elementsByTag(d, "script").map(
+      (e) => h(
+        d,
+        e,
+        `<script${attr(e, "src") ? ` src="${attr(e, "src")}"` : ""}> \u2014 does anything it runs change context, and is the user warned or in control?`,
+        `script|${attr(e, "src") ?? "inline"}`
+      )
+    ),
+    // Any handler binding, whatever the event: `onSubmit` and `onClick` change context as
+    // readily as `onChange`, and a criterion about scripts has no business enumerating events.
+    ...linesOf(d, /\bon[A-Z][A-Za-z]*\s*=|\son[a-z]+\s*=\s*["']/).map(
+      (l) => hAt(d, l.line, "handler", `handler \u2014 does it change context (navigate, submit, open a window, move focus)? ${l.text}`, `handler|${l.text}`)
+    ),
     ...linesOf(d, /\bon(?:Focus|Blur)\s*=/).map(
       (l) => hAt(d, l.line, "handler", `focus handler \u2014 does it change context (navigate, submit, move focus)? ${l.text}`, `onfocus|${l.text}`)
     ),
@@ -45437,9 +45465,11 @@ var EXISTENCE_SUBJECTS = /* @__PURE__ */ new Set([
   "errors",
   "frames",
   "downloadDocs",
-  "newWindow"
+  "newWindow",
+  "contextChange"
 ]);
 var subjectsForSc = (sc) => SC_SUBJECTS[sc] ?? [];
+var ownPackSubjects = (standard, id) => PACK_SUBJECTS[standard]?.[id];
 function subjectsForPackCriterion(standard, id, scs) {
   const own = PACK_SUBJECTS[standard]?.[id];
   if (own) return own;
@@ -54408,6 +54438,13 @@ function derivePackResults(audit2, packKey, pageId) {
   const overrides = pack.overrides;
   const seen = audit2.scope.subjectsSeen;
   const subjectAbsent = (pc) => seen !== void 0 && subjectsAbsent(subjectsForPackCriterion(packKey, pc.id, pc.wcag), new Set(seen));
+  const ownSubjectSeen = (pc) => {
+    if (seen === void 0) return false;
+    const own = ownPackSubjects(packKey, pc.id);
+    if (!own?.length) return false;
+    const present = new Set(seen);
+    return own.some((id) => present.has(id));
+  };
   const ownRuleIds = new Set((pack.rules ?? []).map((r) => `pack:${packKey}:${r.id}`));
   const deriveBase = (pc) => {
     const outOfScope = pc.wcag.every((sc) => {
@@ -54444,6 +54481,9 @@ function derivePackResults(audit2, packKey, pageId) {
       return { id: pc.id, theme: pc.theme, status: INAPPLICABLE_STATUS, findings, scs: pc.wcag, inapplicable: true };
     }
     const inapplicable = status === INAPPLICABLE_STATUS && (scResults.length === 0 || scResults.every((r) => r.inapplicable));
+    if (inapplicable && ownSubjectSeen(pc)) {
+      return { id: pc.id, theme: pc.theme, status: "manual", findings, scs: pc.wcag };
+    }
     return { id: pc.id, theme: pc.theme, status, findings, scs: pc.wcag, ...inapplicable ? { inapplicable: true } : {} };
   };
   const enabledSecondary = (pack.secondaryMappings ?? []).filter((m) => m.enabled === true);

package/skills/review-a11y/SKILL.md

@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ when_to_use: "Invoke WITHOUT being asked whenever changed front-end code should
 allowed-tools: Bash(node ${CLAUDE_SKILL_DIR}/scripts/ultra11y.mjs *), Read, Grep, Glob
 license: MIT
 metadata:
-  version: 5.26.0
+  version: 5.27.0
 ---
 
 # review-a11y — accessibility review of changed code

package/skills/review-a11y/scripts/ultra11y.mjs

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ import { join as join51, relative as relative5, resolve as resolve16, sep as sep
 import { fileURLToPath as fileURLToPath5, pathToFileURL as pathToFileURL3 } from "url";
 
 // src/types.ts
-var VERSION = "5.26.0";
+var VERSION = "5.27.0";
 var SCHEMA_VERSION = 2;
 var INAPPLICABLE_STATUS = "C";
 
@@ -45061,14 +45061,42 @@ var SUBJECTS = {
       (e) => h(d, e, `<${e.tag} autoplay=${attr(e, "autoplay") !== void 0} controls=${attr(e, "controls") !== void 0}>`, `media|${e.tag}`)
     )
   ]),
-  // A change of context triggered by focus or by changing a value.
-  // RGAA 7.4 / WCAG 3.2.1-3.2.2. The handlers are half the subject; the OTHER half is what a
-  // script does once it runs, and that is where a context change actually happens: submitting a
-  // form, navigating, opening a window. Looking only for onFocus/onBlur/onChange left the
-  // criterion with an empty harvest on any codebase that binds its handlers in JavaScript
-  // rather than in markup — which is most of them — and an empty harvest is a criterion the
-  // adjudicator can only guess at.
+  // A change of context initiated by a script. RGAA 7.4 / WCAG 3.2.1-3.2.2.
+  //
+  // THE SUBJECT IS THE SCRIPT, and getting that wrong cost a release. This used to be a list of
+  // CONSEQUENCES — onFocus/onBlur/onChange, `.submit(`, `location`, `router.push`,
+  // `window.open` — on the theory that a context change is one of them. It is, but the list can
+  // only ever be the ways we have already seen a script change context, and a criterion whose
+  // subject is « each script » cannot be answered from a catalogue of endings.
+  //
+  // Measured on tests/fixtures/realworld, which ships LoginForm.tsx whose form carries
+  // `onSubmit={(e) => { e.preventDefault(); … }}`: 7.4 reached the adjudicator with population
+  // ZERO. A script was right there, doing the thing the criterion asks about, and the harvest
+  // walked past it because `onSubmit` was not on the list. The adjudicator was told « no
+  // evidence » and billed to guess between NA and manual — on a page it should have been handed
+  // twenty lines of React to read.
+  //
+  // So it collects the script FIRST: any `<script>`, any `on*` binding whatever the event, and
+  // then the consequences it always looked for, which stay because they are what an adjudicator
+  // most needs pointed out. Two things follow. A page with a script always arrives with it, so
+  // the verdict is made on the code rather than on its absence. And a page with no script at all
+  // harvests nothing — which is now a FACT about the code, not a gap in a pattern list, so 7.4
+  // and 3.2.1/3.2.2 close as « not applicable » with no model in the loop (EXISTENCE_SUBJECTS).
   contextChange: (docs) => docs.flatMap((d) => [
+    // The script itself — the subject, before anything it goes on to do.
+    ...elementsByTag(d, "script").map(
+      (e) => h(
+        d,
+        e,
+        `<script${attr(e, "src") ? ` src="${attr(e, "src")}"` : ""}> \u2014 does anything it runs change context, and is the user warned or in control?`,
+        `script|${attr(e, "src") ?? "inline"}`
+      )
+    ),
+    // Any handler binding, whatever the event: `onSubmit` and `onClick` change context as
+    // readily as `onChange`, and a criterion about scripts has no business enumerating events.
+    ...linesOf(d, /\bon[A-Z][A-Za-z]*\s*=|\son[a-z]+\s*=\s*["']/).map(
+      (l) => hAt(d, l.line, "handler", `handler \u2014 does it change context (navigate, submit, open a window, move focus)? ${l.text}`, `handler|${l.text}`)
+    ),
     ...linesOf(d, /\bon(?:Focus|Blur)\s*=/).map(
       (l) => hAt(d, l.line, "handler", `focus handler \u2014 does it change context (navigate, submit, move focus)? ${l.text}`, `onfocus|${l.text}`)
     ),
@@ -45437,9 +45465,11 @@ var EXISTENCE_SUBJECTS = /* @__PURE__ */ new Set([
   "errors",
   "frames",
   "downloadDocs",
-  "newWindow"
+  "newWindow",
+  "contextChange"
 ]);
 var subjectsForSc = (sc) => SC_SUBJECTS[sc] ?? [];
+var ownPackSubjects = (standard, id) => PACK_SUBJECTS[standard]?.[id];
 function subjectsForPackCriterion(standard, id, scs) {
   const own = PACK_SUBJECTS[standard]?.[id];
   if (own) return own;
@@ -54408,6 +54438,13 @@ function derivePackResults(audit2, packKey, pageId) {
   const overrides = pack.overrides;
   const seen = audit2.scope.subjectsSeen;
   const subjectAbsent = (pc) => seen !== void 0 && subjectsAbsent(subjectsForPackCriterion(packKey, pc.id, pc.wcag), new Set(seen));
+  const ownSubjectSeen = (pc) => {
+    if (seen === void 0) return false;
+    const own = ownPackSubjects(packKey, pc.id);
+    if (!own?.length) return false;
+    const present = new Set(seen);
+    return own.some((id) => present.has(id));
+  };
   const ownRuleIds = new Set((pack.rules ?? []).map((r) => `pack:${packKey}:${r.id}`));
   const deriveBase = (pc) => {
     const outOfScope = pc.wcag.every((sc) => {
@@ -54444,6 +54481,9 @@ function derivePackResults(audit2, packKey, pageId) {
       return { id: pc.id, theme: pc.theme, status: INAPPLICABLE_STATUS, findings, scs: pc.wcag, inapplicable: true };
     }
     const inapplicable = status === INAPPLICABLE_STATUS && (scResults.length === 0 || scResults.every((r) => r.inapplicable));
+    if (inapplicable && ownSubjectSeen(pc)) {
+      return { id: pc.id, theme: pc.theme, status: "manual", findings, scs: pc.wcag };
+    }
     return { id: pc.id, theme: pc.theme, status, findings, scs: pc.wcag, ...inapplicable ? { inapplicable: true } : {} };
   };
   const enabledSecondary = (pack.secondaryMappings ?? []).filter((m) => m.enabled === true);

package/skills/ultra11y/SKILL.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ description: "Use to AUDIT existing HTML/CSS/JSX against WCAG 2.2 AA accessibili
 when_to_use: "Invoke when the user asks for an accessibility AUDIT or a formal deliverable: audit a repo, site or page against WCAG 2.2 AA or a country standard (RGAA, Section 508, EN 301 549); produce a dated conformance report, a criterion grid, a PRD backlog, or tickets (GitHub/GitLab/Jira); author accessible markup from scratch; wire the repo gate (init --hook/--ci) or a rendered-DOM capture pipeline. For a review of the code UNDER CHANGE (diff, branch, PR), use the `review-a11y` skill instead."
 license: MIT
 metadata:
-  version: 5.26.0
+  version: 5.27.0
 ---
 
 # ultra11y — audit WCAG 2.2 AA and write accessible markup

package/skills/ultra11y/scripts/ultra11y.mjs

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ import { join as join51, relative as relative5, resolve as resolve16, sep as sep
 import { fileURLToPath as fileURLToPath5, pathToFileURL as pathToFileURL3 } from "url";
 
 // src/types.ts
-var VERSION = "5.26.0";
+var VERSION = "5.27.0";
 var SCHEMA_VERSION = 2;
 var INAPPLICABLE_STATUS = "C";
 
@@ -45061,14 +45061,42 @@ var SUBJECTS = {
       (e) => h(d, e, `<${e.tag} autoplay=${attr(e, "autoplay") !== void 0} controls=${attr(e, "controls") !== void 0}>`, `media|${e.tag}`)
     )
   ]),
-  // A change of context triggered by focus or by changing a value.
-  // RGAA 7.4 / WCAG 3.2.1-3.2.2. The handlers are half the subject; the OTHER half is what a
-  // script does once it runs, and that is where a context change actually happens: submitting a
-  // form, navigating, opening a window. Looking only for onFocus/onBlur/onChange left the
-  // criterion with an empty harvest on any codebase that binds its handlers in JavaScript
-  // rather than in markup — which is most of them — and an empty harvest is a criterion the
-  // adjudicator can only guess at.
+  // A change of context initiated by a script. RGAA 7.4 / WCAG 3.2.1-3.2.2.
+  //
+  // THE SUBJECT IS THE SCRIPT, and getting that wrong cost a release. This used to be a list of
+  // CONSEQUENCES — onFocus/onBlur/onChange, `.submit(`, `location`, `router.push`,
+  // `window.open` — on the theory that a context change is one of them. It is, but the list can
+  // only ever be the ways we have already seen a script change context, and a criterion whose
+  // subject is « each script » cannot be answered from a catalogue of endings.
+  //
+  // Measured on tests/fixtures/realworld, which ships LoginForm.tsx whose form carries
+  // `onSubmit={(e) => { e.preventDefault(); … }}`: 7.4 reached the adjudicator with population
+  // ZERO. A script was right there, doing the thing the criterion asks about, and the harvest
+  // walked past it because `onSubmit` was not on the list. The adjudicator was told « no
+  // evidence » and billed to guess between NA and manual — on a page it should have been handed
+  // twenty lines of React to read.
+  //
+  // So it collects the script FIRST: any `<script>`, any `on*` binding whatever the event, and
+  // then the consequences it always looked for, which stay because they are what an adjudicator
+  // most needs pointed out. Two things follow. A page with a script always arrives with it, so
+  // the verdict is made on the code rather than on its absence. And a page with no script at all
+  // harvests nothing — which is now a FACT about the code, not a gap in a pattern list, so 7.4
+  // and 3.2.1/3.2.2 close as « not applicable » with no model in the loop (EXISTENCE_SUBJECTS).
   contextChange: (docs) => docs.flatMap((d) => [
+    // The script itself — the subject, before anything it goes on to do.
+    ...elementsByTag(d, "script").map(
+      (e) => h(
+        d,
+        e,
+        `<script${attr(e, "src") ? ` src="${attr(e, "src")}"` : ""}> \u2014 does anything it runs change context, and is the user warned or in control?`,
+        `script|${attr(e, "src") ?? "inline"}`
+      )
+    ),
+    // Any handler binding, whatever the event: `onSubmit` and `onClick` change context as
+    // readily as `onChange`, and a criterion about scripts has no business enumerating events.
+    ...linesOf(d, /\bon[A-Z][A-Za-z]*\s*=|\son[a-z]+\s*=\s*["']/).map(
+      (l) => hAt(d, l.line, "handler", `handler \u2014 does it change context (navigate, submit, open a window, move focus)? ${l.text}`, `handler|${l.text}`)
+    ),
     ...linesOf(d, /\bon(?:Focus|Blur)\s*=/).map(
       (l) => hAt(d, l.line, "handler", `focus handler \u2014 does it change context (navigate, submit, move focus)? ${l.text}`, `onfocus|${l.text}`)
     ),
@@ -45437,9 +45465,11 @@ var EXISTENCE_SUBJECTS = /* @__PURE__ */ new Set([
   "errors",
   "frames",
   "downloadDocs",
-  "newWindow"
+  "newWindow",
+  "contextChange"
 ]);
 var subjectsForSc = (sc) => SC_SUBJECTS[sc] ?? [];
+var ownPackSubjects = (standard, id) => PACK_SUBJECTS[standard]?.[id];
 function subjectsForPackCriterion(standard, id, scs) {
   const own = PACK_SUBJECTS[standard]?.[id];
   if (own) return own;
@@ -54408,6 +54438,13 @@ function derivePackResults(audit2, packKey, pageId) {
   const overrides = pack.overrides;
   const seen = audit2.scope.subjectsSeen;
   const subjectAbsent = (pc) => seen !== void 0 && subjectsAbsent(subjectsForPackCriterion(packKey, pc.id, pc.wcag), new Set(seen));
+  const ownSubjectSeen = (pc) => {
+    if (seen === void 0) return false;
+    const own = ownPackSubjects(packKey, pc.id);
+    if (!own?.length) return false;
+    const present = new Set(seen);
+    return own.some((id) => present.has(id));
+  };
   const ownRuleIds = new Set((pack.rules ?? []).map((r) => `pack:${packKey}:${r.id}`));
   const deriveBase = (pc) => {
     const outOfScope = pc.wcag.every((sc) => {
@@ -54444,6 +54481,9 @@ function derivePackResults(audit2, packKey, pageId) {
       return { id: pc.id, theme: pc.theme, status: INAPPLICABLE_STATUS, findings, scs: pc.wcag, inapplicable: true };
     }
     const inapplicable = status === INAPPLICABLE_STATUS && (scResults.length === 0 || scResults.every((r) => r.inapplicable));
+    if (inapplicable && ownSubjectSeen(pc)) {
+      return { id: pc.id, theme: pc.theme, status: "manual", findings, scs: pc.wcag };
+    }
     return { id: pc.id, theme: pc.theme, status, findings, scs: pc.wcag, ...inapplicable ? { inapplicable: true } : {} };
   };
   const enabledSecondary = (pack.secondaryMappings ?? []).filter((m) => m.enabled === true);

package/src/adjudicate-subjects.ts

@@ -706,15 +706,43 @@ export const SUBJECTS: Record<string, Subject> = {
       ),
     ]),
 
-  // A change of context triggered by focus or by changing a value.
-  // RGAA 7.4 / WCAG 3.2.1-3.2.2. The handlers are half the subject; the OTHER half is what a
-  // script does once it runs, and that is where a context change actually happens: submitting a
-  // form, navigating, opening a window. Looking only for onFocus/onBlur/onChange left the
-  // criterion with an empty harvest on any codebase that binds its handlers in JavaScript
-  // rather than in markup — which is most of them — and an empty harvest is a criterion the
-  // adjudicator can only guess at.
+  // A change of context initiated by a script. RGAA 7.4 / WCAG 3.2.1-3.2.2.
+  //
+  // THE SUBJECT IS THE SCRIPT, and getting that wrong cost a release. This used to be a list of
+  // CONSEQUENCES — onFocus/onBlur/onChange, `.submit(`, `location`, `router.push`,
+  // `window.open` — on the theory that a context change is one of them. It is, but the list can
+  // only ever be the ways we have already seen a script change context, and a criterion whose
+  // subject is « each script » cannot be answered from a catalogue of endings.
+  //
+  // Measured on tests/fixtures/realworld, which ships LoginForm.tsx whose form carries
+  // `onSubmit={(e) => { e.preventDefault(); … }}`: 7.4 reached the adjudicator with population
+  // ZERO. A script was right there, doing the thing the criterion asks about, and the harvest
+  // walked past it because `onSubmit` was not on the list. The adjudicator was told « no
+  // evidence » and billed to guess between NA and manual — on a page it should have been handed
+  // twenty lines of React to read.
+  //
+  // So it collects the script FIRST: any `<script>`, any `on*` binding whatever the event, and
+  // then the consequences it always looked for, which stay because they are what an adjudicator
+  // most needs pointed out. Two things follow. A page with a script always arrives with it, so
+  // the verdict is made on the code rather than on its absence. And a page with no script at all
+  // harvests nothing — which is now a FACT about the code, not a gap in a pattern list, so 7.4
+  // and 3.2.1/3.2.2 close as « not applicable » with no model in the loop (EXISTENCE_SUBJECTS).
   contextChange: (docs) =>
     docs.flatMap((d) => [
+      // The script itself — the subject, before anything it goes on to do.
+      ...elementsByTag(d, "script").map((e) =>
+        h(
+          d,
+          e,
+          `<script${attr(e, "src") ? ` src="${attr(e, "src")}"` : ""}> — does anything it runs change context, and is the user warned or in control?`,
+          `script|${attr(e, "src") ?? "inline"}`,
+        ),
+      ),
+      // Any handler binding, whatever the event: `onSubmit` and `onClick` change context as
+      // readily as `onChange`, and a criterion about scripts has no business enumerating events.
+      ...linesOf(d, /\bon[A-Z][A-Za-z]*\s*=|\son[a-z]+\s*=\s*["']/).map((l) =>
+        hAt(d, l.line, "handler", `handler — does it change context (navigate, submit, open a window, move focus)? ${l.text}`, `handler|${l.text}`),
+      ),
       ...linesOf(d, /\bon(?:Focus|Blur)\s*=/).map((l) =>
         hAt(d, l.line, "handler", `focus handler — does it change context (navigate, submit, move focus)? ${l.text}`, `onfocus|${l.text}`),
       ),
@@ -1200,13 +1228,22 @@ export const PACK_SUBJECTS: Record<string, Record<string, string[]>> = {
 // this comment was written from, both were ruled NA on the first pass with no gate refusal,
 // which is the definition of a paid turn that decided nothing.
 //
-// THE OTHER ONE, 7.4, STAYS OUT, and the asymmetry is the whole point of the rule above.
-// `contextChange` does not enumerate the ways a browser CAN change context, it enumerates the
-// ways we have seen a script do it — `.submit(`, `location.href`, `router.push`, a handful of
-// handler attributes. A component that navigates through a router the list does not name
-// (`history.push`, a custom `navigate()`, `location.reload()`) fails 7.4 and matches none of
-// them. Its silence is what a failing page looks like, so admitting it would buy a cheap NA at
-// the price of a hidden non-conformity.
+// `contextChange` is here too NOW, and it was not before — the earlier refusal was right about
+// the rule and wrong about the subject, so it is worth writing down which changed.
+//
+// It used to enumerate CONSEQUENCES: `.submit(`, `location.href`, `router.push`, a handful of
+// handler attributes. Read that way it is a heuristic, its silence is what a failing page looks
+// like, and admitting it would have bought a cheap NA at the price of a hidden non-conformity.
+// That refusal stood, and it also let a real defect stand: on tests/fixtures/realworld, 7.4
+// arrived with population ZERO from a page shipping `onSubmit={(e) => …}` — a script the harvest
+// simply did not look for.
+//
+// The subject is the SCRIPT now, not the endings: any `<script>`, any `on*` binding. RGAA 7.4
+// asks about « chaque script qui initie un changement de contexte », so a page that FAILS it runs
+// a script, and a scope with no script anywhere has nothing for the criterion to be about. That
+// is an element species, and its silence is a fact a reader can check — the same test
+// `downloadDocs` and `newWindow` pass. The heuristics stay in the harvest as POINTERS for
+// whoever reads it; they are no longer what decides whether the subject exists.
 export const EXISTENCE_SUBJECTS: ReadonlySet<string> = new Set([
   "images",
   "tables",
@@ -1218,6 +1255,7 @@ export const EXISTENCE_SUBJECTS: ReadonlySet<string> = new Set([
   "frames",
   "downloadDocs",
   "newWindow",
+  "contextChange",
 ]);
 
 /** The subjects that decide a success criterion. Empty ⇒ the criterion has none declared,
@@ -1228,6 +1266,16 @@ export const subjectsForSc = (sc: string): string[] => SC_SUBJECTS[sc] ?? [];
  *  of its mapped success criteria's. The override is what stops RGAA 11.1 (are the fields
  *  labelled?) from being handed the page's heading outline because 1.3.1 happens to come
  *  first in its `wcag` list. */
+/** The subjects a pack criterion declares FOR ITSELF, as opposed to the union it inherits from
+ *  its WCAG mapping. Undefined when it declares none.
+ *
+ *  The distinction decides whether an INHERITED absence may close the criterion. RGAA 13.2 maps
+ *  onto WCAG 3.2.1, whose subject is a script; 13.2's own subject is a window opening. On a page
+ *  carrying `target="_blank"` and no script at all, 3.2.1 is legitimately « nothing of that kind
+ *  in scope » — and 13.2 inherited that closure and published a conformity over an element
+ *  nobody had looked at. Its own subject was right there in the harvest. */
+export const ownPackSubjects = (standard: string, id: string): string[] | undefined => PACK_SUBJECTS[standard]?.[id];
+
 export function subjectsForPackCriterion(standard: string, id: string, scs: string[]): string[] {
   const own = PACK_SUBJECTS[standard]?.[id];
   if (own) return own;

package/src/standards/derive.ts

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 // presentation-only WCAG view (former src/standard.ts). For each pack criterion, gather
 // the results of the WCAG SCs it maps to and fold them with the same NC-dominates rule.
 // Presentation-only: the canonical, gated verdict lives on the WCAG core.
-import { subjectsAbsent, subjectsForPackCriterion } from "../adjudicate-subjects.js";
+import { ownPackSubjects, subjectsAbsent, subjectsForPackCriterion } from "../adjudicate-subjects.js";
 import { coverageFor, criterionMeasuredOn, unionCoverage } from "../coverage.js";
 import type { AuditResult, CriterionResult, PageCoverage, Status, Finding, Severity } from "../types.js";
 import { CORE_KEY, loadPack } from "./registry.js";
@@ -264,6 +264,16 @@ export function derivePackResults(audit: AuditResult, packKey: string, pageId?:
   // scope that read no file.
   const seen = audit.scope.subjectsSeen;
   const subjectAbsent = (pc: PackCriterion): boolean => seen !== undefined && subjectsAbsent(subjectsForPackCriterion(packKey, pc.id, pc.wcag), new Set(seen));
+  // Did the criterion's OWN subject turn up? Only its own counts: a criterion that declares none
+  // has nothing to defend against an inherited closure, and the union it borrows from its WCAG
+  // mapping is exactly where that closure came from.
+  const ownSubjectSeen = (pc: PackCriterion): boolean => {
+    if (seen === undefined) return false;
+    const own = ownPackSubjects(packKey, pc.id);
+    if (!own?.length) return false;
+    const present = new Set(seen);
+    return own.some((id) => present.has(id));
+  };
 
   // Rules the PACK ITSELF brings, by finding id. A criterion whose `appliesTo` names one of
   // these has an instrument regardless of what its WCAG mapping is worth — which is the whole
@@ -361,6 +371,28 @@ export function derivePackResults(audit: AuditResult, packKey: string, pageId?:
       return { id: pc.id, theme: pc.theme, status: INAPPLICABLE_STATUS as Status, findings, scs: pc.wcag, inapplicable: true };
     }
     const inapplicable = status === INAPPLICABLE_STATUS && (scResults.length === 0 || scResults.every((r) => r.inapplicable));
+    // AN INHERITED ABSENCE CANNOT CLOSE A CRITERION WHOSE OWN SUBJECT IS PRESENT.
+    //
+    // `inapplicable` here means every mapped success criterion came back « nothing of that kind
+    // is in scope ». That is a statement about THEIR subject, and a pack criterion frequently
+    // asks about a different one — which is the entire reason PACK_SUBJECTS exists. Publishing
+    // their absence as our conformity is the precise shape of « conforming because nobody
+    // looked », and it is worse than leaving the criterion open: in the deliverable it reads
+    // identically to a verified conformity.
+    //
+    // Measured on RGAA 13.2 (« l'ouverture d'une nouvelle fenêtre ne doit pas être déclenchée
+    // sans action de l'utilisateur »), which maps onto WCAG 3.2.1, whose subject is a script. On
+    // a page carrying `target="_blank"` and no script, 3.2.1 is honestly inapplicable — and 13.2
+    // inherited that and reported « conforme faute de sujet » over a link sitting in its own
+    // harvest. It surfaced the day `contextChange` became an existence subject, which is what
+    // made 3.2.1 closable at all; the flaw predates that and was merely unreachable.
+    //
+    // The answer is « undecided », never a conformity: our subject is here and nobody has ruled
+    // on it. NC is already excluded above, and a criterion declaring no subject of its own is
+    // untouched.
+    if (inapplicable && ownSubjectSeen(pc)) {
+      return { id: pc.id, theme: pc.theme, status: "manual" as Status, findings, scs: pc.wcag };
+    }
     return { id: pc.id, theme: pc.theme, status, findings, scs: pc.wcag, ...(inapplicable ? { inapplicable: true } : {}) };
   };
 

package/src/types.ts

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 // Single source of truth for shared types + the embedded version. sync-version.mjs
 // rewrites VERSION at release time (kept in lockstep with package.json + SKILL.md).
-export const VERSION = "5.26.0";
+export const VERSION = "5.27.0";
 export const SCHEMA_VERSION = 2;
 
 // Lang = the UI FRAME's language — the `L` localization tables each module (report,