ultra-builder-pro-cli 0.26.1 → 3.0.2

package/skills/ultra-plan/SKILL.md

@@ -5,41 +5,50 @@ description: Turn an evidenced Change intent into a dependency-valid task ledger
 
 # Turn one Change into executable tracer bullets
 
-Planning owns decomposition and technical design. Files carry the result across
-sessions and hosts; no runtime state decides whether the plan is meaningful.
+Planning owns decomposition and technical design; files carry it across sessions and hosts.
 
 ## Before you start
 
-1. Read `.ultra/tasks.json`; if a task is unfinished, read its `context_file` and
-   closing `## Resume Note` before replacing or extending anything.
-2. Read `CONTEXT.md` for vocabulary and the relevant `.ultra/decisions/` entries.
-3. Read the active Change intent, its `trace_to` specification anchors, and the
+1. If model-selected, verify the live execution grant in `../ultra-change/references/execution-grant.md` — a current session-local activation or a stably verified durable work-package grant; without either, stop.
+2. Read `../ultra-change/references/change-contract.md` and apply its **Active Change
+   authority resolution** before reading any active `intent.md` or resolving a current
+   `change_id`. This workflow requires its one valid active authority; any zero result
+   or typed diagnostic stops before decomposition until the stated repair or retry
+   succeeds. The intent must be `accepted`, every blocking decision resolved, its
+   `## Research Disposition` exit evidence satisfied, and its `## North Star Trace`
+   current before decomposition.
+3. Read `.ultra/tasks.json`; select matching tasks and read each unfinished context and
+   Resume Note. Preserve all historical tasks in the append-only ledger.
+4. Read `CONTEXT.md` for vocabulary and the relevant `.ultra/decisions/` entries.
+5. Read the active Change intent, its `trace_to` specification anchors, and the
    source, tests, consumers and recovery paths those anchors describe.
 
 ## Definition of done
 
-- `.ultra/tasks.json` and one `.ultra/contexts/task-<id>.md` per task agree on
-  identifiers, status, dependencies and trace anchors.
-- The owner confirmed the scope posture and the seam list.
-- Every feature task is a tracer bullet touching at least two layers, unless the
-  Change itself demonstrably touches only one layer.
-- Every context names the north-star hard constraints its work could violate, and
-  each `HC-<n>` it names resolves to a real entry in `.ultra/north-star.md`.
+- `.ultra/tasks.json` uses `$schema: "ultra-task-ledger-v2"` and is the sole
+  task-status authority. Every current-Change row resolves one context whose stable
+  identifiers, dependencies and trace anchors agree with the ledger.
+- The owner confirmed any material posture. Seams resolve to code; technical selection
+  stays model-owned unless it changes public contract, accepted risk, or material trade-off.
+- Every feature task is a tracer bullet crossing the real boundaries needed to make its
+  observable behavior work; a genuinely local Change does not invent extra layers.
+- Every task context records resolving `FP-<n>` premises, `NS-<n>` outcomes, and
+  `HC-<n>` constraints as IDs only. It explains the task-local causal contribution and
+  potential constraint breach without mirroring North Star prose.
 - Every Change acceptance id maps to at least one task context, and every context id
   resolves back to the active Change.
-- Coverage, dependency, trace, scope and context-budget checks have concrete results.
+- Coverage, dependency, trace, scope and context-pressure checks have concrete results.
 
 ## Fix the planning posture
 
-Choose `EXPAND`, `SELECTIVE`, `HOLD` or `REDUCE`; default to `SELECTIVE`. Once
-chosen, keep that posture visible in the active Change intent rather than silently drifting.
-Write it to the active Change `intent.md` under `## Planning Posture`; there is no
-separate `plan.md` authority.
+Choose `EXPAND`, `SELECTIVE`, `HOLD` or `REDUCE`; default to `SELECTIVE`. Write it under
+`## Planning Posture` in active `intent.md`; there is no separate `plan.md` authority.
+Keep the posture visible rather than silently drifting.
 Use `../ultra-grilling/SKILL.md` through the host-native question surface when the
 choice remains material, one question with a recommendation at a time.
 
-If the work cannot fit in one session *and* the path itself is still unclear, use
-`../ultra-think/SKILL.md` to resolve decision tickets before decomposing tasks.
+When the whole path is still unclear, recommend `ultra-research`; the Change is not yet
+evidenced enough to decompose. For one consequential trade-off, use `../ultra-think/SKILL.md`.
 
 ## Choose the plan shape
 
@@ -50,28 +59,44 @@ expand with old and new forms, migrate bounded batches, then contract the old fo
 
 Build the graph with these structural defences:
 
-- **Walking Skeleton**: Task 1 traverses every layer this Change touches through one
-  real request and real data. A genuinely one-layer Change does not invent one.
-- **Contract task**: create it before both implementations when targets cross two top-
-  level source directories or two processes/services.
-- **Integration Checkpoint**: insert one after every three or four feature tasks.
+- **Walking Skeleton**: the earliest executable tracer bullet traverses the real
+  boundaries this Change touches with real data. A genuinely one-layer Change does not
+  invent extra layers.
+- **Contract task**: create one before dependent implementations when a shared contract
+  must remain valid while independently changed boundaries coexist.
+- **Integration Checkpoint**: insert one where independently developed slices first
+  compose, or where the observed coupling or recovery risk makes an intermediate
+  whole-path check useful.
 - A feature task that touches only one of several affected layers is merged or split
   into a tracer bullet; moving a whole layer into one task is horizontal slicing.
 
-Confirm the seam list before tests are written. Reuse an existing public seam and use
-the highest seam that observes the behavior; one seam is ideal when it covers the path.
+Record seams before tests. The model chooses the technical seam: prefer an existing,
+highest observable public seam, ideally one. Ask the owner only when it changes the
+public contract or another material product, risk, or recovery trade-off.
 
 ## Write the files
 
-Each task records `id`, `title`, `type`, `priority`, `complexity`, `status`,
-`dependencies`, `context_file`, `trace_to` and `change_ref`. Complexity is only a
-splitting and context signal: 1–2 is local, 3–5 is bounded, 6–7 crosses a boundary,
-and complexity > 7 must split.
-
-Each context records Change Acceptance IDs, task-local Acceptance, confirmed seams,
-layers touched, target files, Implementation, verification commands, the hard
-constraints the work could violate, Definition of Drift, Change Log, Completion and
-Resume Note. Read every file back; task count and context count must match.
+The ledger root records `$schema: "ultra-task-ledger-v2"` and `tasks`. Each new task
+records `id`, `title`, `type`, `priority`, `status`, `dependencies`, `context_file`,
+`trace_to` and `change_id`. Task ids are globally unique, and every dependency must name
+a task with the same `change_id`; an archived Change must never become an implicit
+prerequisite of current work. A legacy `complexity` field remains readable only as a
+migration diagnostic. It is not copied into new rows and never decides splitting,
+priority, scope, context, or completion.
+
+Append new tasks or repair matching current-Change tasks in place; never replace the
+ledger with only the latest graph. Every active Change receives the smallest graph that
+covers its real seams, evidence, review, and recovery needs. A profile does not decide
+the number of tasks or contexts.
+
+Each context records Change Acceptance IDs, a task-local Acceptance table with `ID`,
+`Criterion`, `Verification type`, and `Required evidence`, confirmed seams, layers
+touched, target files, Implementation, verification commands, the hard constraints the
+work could violate, a Trace containing `FP-<n>`, `NS-<n>`, and `HC-<n>` IDs, Definition
+of Drift, Change Log, Completion, Task Review, and Resume Note. A v2 context does not
+repeat task status. If a legacy context contains a Status or Complexity header, preserve
+it as a migration diagnostic and use the ledger value. Read every file back and verify
+that every row resolves its named context and every current context resolves one row.
 
 Name a hard constraint whenever the task could plausibly breach it, not only when you
 expect it to. The entry costs one line and is what makes a later breach a checkable
@@ -84,22 +109,34 @@ touches nothing constrained.
    context IDs. Map every in-scope user story or specification anchor to at least one task.
 2. Walk dependencies and repair every cycle with the exact cycle chain visible.
 3. Resolve every `trace_to` path and heading against a real file.
-4. Resolve every `HC-<n>` against `.ultra/north-star.md`. A dangling constraint id is
-   the same defect as a dangling `trace_to`: it reads as checked and never was.
-5. Surface complexity, more than eight target files, or more than twenty tasks as
-   scope warnings; they are observations, not semantic verdicts.
-6. Estimate context at roughly `complexity × 5%`; surface anything above 40%.
+4. Resolve the Change and task `North Star Trace` `FP-<n>`/`NS-<n>`/`HC-<n>` ids
+   against `.ultra/north-star.md`. A revision mismatch is a stale observation that
+   returns to Change reconciliation, not a semantic verdict about alignment.
+5. Surface concrete scope pressure: unresolved dependencies, duplicated ownership,
+   boundaries that cannot be tested independently, evidence that cannot fit the named
+   seam, or a context that no longer supports a reliable resume. File, task, line, and
+   context counts do not decide plan quality.
+6. Validate exact ledger fields, ids, dependency edges, paths and typed acceptance
+   shapes. A validator reports structural diagnostics only; it never decides whether
+   the decomposition, criterion, evidence, or plan is semantically sufficient.
+Follow `../ultra-review/SKILL.md` in plan mode. Require a validated current
+`SUMMARY.json`; resolve every blocking finding and refresh affected evidence before
+handoff. If further repair is not justified or an authorized resource ceiling is
+reached, preserve the findings and return the evidence to the responsible model or
+owner. Attempt and finding counts never manufacture convergence or failure.
 
 Report the graph, frontier, seams, warnings and first task. Recommend the next explicit
 capability from the files; do not invoke it.
 
 ## When the owner decides
 
-The owner chooses the posture, confirms seams, resolves reductions and accepts material
-omissions. Mechanical cycles and broken paths are repaired before handoff because they
-make the written graph impossible to execute.
-
+The owner chooses material posture, reductions, omissions, and any seam changing public
+contract or material trade-off. The model owns decomposition and repairs broken paths.
 ## References
 
+- `../ultra-change/references/change-contract.md` — canonical Active Change authority resolution.
 - `../ultra-grilling/SKILL.md` — read before a material posture or seam question.
-- `../ultra-think/SKILL.md` — read when fog of war requires decision tickets.
+- `../ultra-think/SKILL.md` — read when one evidenced decision blocks decomposition.
+- `../ultra-review/SKILL.md` — read after plan files pass mechanical verification.
+- `../ultra-change/references/execution-grant.md` — read only for grant-activated continuation.
+- `references/task-evidence-v2.md` — canonical typed task evidence and task-review contract.

package/skills/ultra-plan/references/task-evidence-v2.md

@@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
+# Task ledger, context, and evidence v2
+
+Use this contract when Plan creates a task or when Dev refreshes completion evidence.
+The ledger owns mechanical task status. A task context contains meaning and resume
+information but does not repeat `status`, `priority`, or `complexity` in a metadata
+header. A legacy header is readable only as an observation; the ledger wins and the
+reader reports a migration diagnostic.
+
+## Ledger and context
+
+The ledger root is exactly `$schema` plus `tasks`, with `$schema` set to
+`ultra-task-ledger-v2`. A current task row has these fields:
+
+```text
+id, title, type, priority, status, dependencies, context_file, trace_to, change_id
+```
+
+Legacy rows may retain `complexity`; do not use it to decide task, file, question,
+finding, repair-round, or quality limits. The Acceptance section in every current
+context starts with the Change Acceptance IDs and this exact table:
+
+```markdown
+| ID | Criterion | Verification type | Required evidence |
+|---|---|---|---|
+```
+
+Criterion IDs are unique inside one task. Verification type is exactly `command`,
+`inspection`, `owner-judgment`, or `external-observation`. The required-evidence cell
+names evidence that can actually establish the criterion; it is not a second status.
+
+## Evidence root
+
+`.ultra/evidence/<task-id>/evidence.json` is the one final completion record. It uses
+`ultra-task-evidence-v2` and the exact ordered root fields below:
+
+The product-worktree digest has one fixed boundary: it excludes `.ultra/evidence/**`,
+whose command and external-observation entries bind raw bytes as
+`raw_evidence_sha256` before stable exact record bytes are bound as `evidence_digest` by
+aggregate Test. This makes evidence publication and refresh non-self-referential without
+hiding provenance. No workflow supplies an additional exclusion.
+
+```text
+$schema, task_id, change_id, context, subject, acceptance, dimensions,
+task_review, artifacts, limitations, timestamp
+```
+
+`context` is exactly `{path, acceptance_sha256}`. Hash the UTF-8 bytes beginning with
+the `## Acceptance Criteria` heading and ending immediately before the next level-two
+heading. Do not bind the whole mutable task context. `subject` is exactly
+`{git_head, worktree_digest, observed_at}`. The `subject` is an independently captured
+completion-snapshot freshness observation: capture it after the final strict task Review
+validates and immediately before evidence publication. `task_review` separately binds
+the retained strict summary. Worker Packet v1 carries no worktree digest and its
+`SUMMARY.json` records `worktree_digest: null`, so neither review artifact proves or
+cryptographically binds `subject.worktree_digest`. The subject is not rebound to a later
+aggregate Change worktree.
+
+Each acceptance item is exactly:
+
+```json
+{
+  "criterion_id": "A-01",
+  "verification_type": "inspection",
+  "evidence": {
+    "source": "path/to/source",
+    "observation": "The observable fact.",
+    "revision": "the observed revision"
+  },
+  "disposition": {
+    "authority": "model",
+    "result": "satisfied",
+    "rationale": "Why the evidence supports this disposition."
+  }
+}
+```
+
+`result` is `satisfied`, `gap`, or `not_applicable`. The validator checks the record's
+shape and authority token. It never infers the result from an exit code, digest,
+counter, validator success, or model assertion.
+
+## Typed evidence
+
+Use exactly one evidence object for each criterion:
+
+- `command`: `{command, cwd, exit_code, raw_evidence_ref, raw_evidence_sha256,
+  freshness_identity}`, where freshness identity is
+  `{git_head, worktree_digest, observed_at}`.
+- `inspection`: `{source, observation, revision}`.
+- `owner-judgment`: `{owner_record_ref, owner_statement_or_disposition}`. Its
+  disposition authority must be `owner`; the model and validator cannot satisfy it.
+- `external-observation`: `{provider, run_id, observed_at, raw_evidence_ref,
+  raw_evidence_sha256, observation}`.
+
+`raw_evidence_sha256` is the lowercase SHA-256 of the exact bytes named by
+`raw_evidence_ref`. The structural validator requires a normalized, mechanically safe
+repository-relative ref and an exact 64-hex digest; structural mode does not dereference
+the ref. Dev, Test, Status, and Deliver resolve it below the real repository root, require
+every parent and the final file to remain repository-contained and non-symlink, open the
+final ordinary regular file nonblocking and no-follow, cap the snapshot at 8 MiB, and
+compare path and descriptor identity before and after reading. They hash only that one
+bounded stable byte snapshot. A missing, special, symlinked, escaped, oversized, or
+replaced ref is a typed evidence gap with retry or owning-task repair, never accepted
+provenance.
+
+`dimensions` contains exactly `tests_written`, `tests_passed`, `persistence_real`,
+`feature_flags_audit`, `vertical_slice`, and `spec_trace`. Each dimension is an explicit
+`{status, evidence_refs, rationale}` observation; its status uses the same three result
+tokens and is not a semantic score.
+
+## Task review
+
+First-review admission does not consume this final record. It consumes the ledger's
+`in_progress` row, the task context and acceptance bytes, the immutable review packet,
+and actual pre-review evidence already observed at the four typed authorities. Raw
+outputs and citations may exist before review, but they do not form another evidence
+schema, completion record, or task-status authority. Do not write `evidence.json` before the task's validated final `SUMMARY.json` exists.
+
+`task_review` is exactly:
+
+```json
+{
+  "execution_packet": {
+    "state": "available",
+    "digest": "<sha256>",
+    "limitation": null
+  },
+  "session_id": "<review-session>",
+  "summary_ref": ".ultra/reviews/<review-session>/SUMMARY.json",
+  "summary_digest": "<sha256>",
+  "blocking_findings": [
+    {
+      "id": "<finding-id>",
+      "resolution": "<what changed>",
+      "disposition": "<resolved, accepted risk, or still a gap>",
+      "evidence_refresh_refs": ["<fresh evidence>"]
+    }
+  ],
+  "retention": "<when the derived review may be removed>"
+}
+```
+
+For work that predates Execution Packet v1, use `state: pre-v1-unavailable`, a null
+digest, and a non-empty limitation. Never manufacture a bootstrap digest. Keep the task
+`in_progress` through implementation and blocking review repair. If a repair changes
+implementation or evidence in review scope, create and validate a new immutable review
+session before closeout; do not claim that Worker Packet v1 binds the resulting worktree.
+
+### Task-review provenance branches
+
+`task_review` carries exactly one of two discriminated provenance branches. Records
+with no `review_mode` field remain the strict-v4 branch, so every existing v2 record
+and aggregate projection stays valid without migration.
+
+The **strict-v4 branch** (`review_mode: "strict-v4"` or absent) is exactly the shape
+above: a real retained `.ultra/reviews/<session>/SUMMARY.json` identity consumed by
+the review waiter and the transport validator.
+
+The **external-manual branch** (`review_mode: "external-manual"`) binds one real
+repository-relative JSON receipt published by the owner-designated external reviewer
+under `.ultra/evidence/<task-id>/`, never under `.ultra/reviews/`:
+
+```json
+{
+  "review_mode": "external-manual",
+  "execution_packet": { "state": "pre-v1-unavailable", "digest": null, "limitation": "..." },
+  "receipt_ref": ".ultra/evidence/<task-id>/external-review.json",
+  "receipt_sha256": "<sha256-of-exact-receipt-bytes>",
+  "blocking_findings": [],
+  "retention": "Retain the exact external receipt bytes; it is a reconstructable observation, never semantic authority."
+}
+```
+
+The receipt itself uses `$schema: ultra-external-review-receipt-v1` with exactly
+`reviewer` (identity), `reviewer_role: "read-only"`, `task_id`, `change_id`,
+`reviewer_authority` (`ref` + `sha256` of the owner record authorizing the external
+review mode/reviewer), `reviewed_contract` (`ref` + `sha256` of the reviewed
+contract bytes), `subject` (`git_head` 40-hex + `worktree_digest` 64-hex of the
+reviewed product worktree), `verdict` (`approve | request_changes`), `findings` (an
+exact array of `{id, severity, title}` with severity P0–P3 and unique ids), and an
+RFC 3339 `timestamp`. It is a reconstructable observation of who reviewed what bytes
+with what result — it is not semantic authority, not owner acceptance, and never a
+fabricated strict SUMMARY/ADMISSION/session. Only current P0/P1 (or owner-promoted)
+receipt findings may appear in `blocking_findings`, and the blocking disposition id
+set must equal exactly the receipt's P0/P1 id set: `approve` is rejected with any
+unresolved P0/P1, `request_changes` with none, and P2/P3 stay recorded and
+non-blocking.
+
+Receipt verification is mandatory: the normal canonical sensor invocation below
+verifies an external-manual record's receipt automatically, and
+`--verify-external-receipt` remains a compatible alias:
+
+```bash
+node skills/ultra-plan/scripts/validate_task_evidence.cjs \
+  .ultra/evidence/<task-id>/evidence.json
+```
+
+The sensor reuses one canonical stable bounded no-follow repository-chain snapshot
+for the receipt, the reviewed contract, and the reviewer-authority record: the real
+repository root and every managed parent must stay ordinary non-symlink directories
+(identities rechecked after reading), and the final entry must be an ordinary
+regular file. It checks only authority/provenance facts: safe normalized receipt
+location inside the task's evidence directory and outside `.ultra/reviews/`, exact
+stable bytes against `receipt_sha256`, the exact receipt schema, task/change
+identity equality with the evidence, reviewed HEAD and product-worktree digest
+equality with the completion subject, exact stable bytes and digests for the
+reviewed contract and the reviewer-authority record, well-formed severities, the
+exact blocker/verdict set, and that every blocking disposition binds a P0/P1
+finding that actually exists in the receipt. A missing, malformed, symlinked,
+special, escaped, oversized, replaced, digest-mismatched, identity- or
+subject-mismatched, unbound-contract, unbound-authority, or substituted receipt
+returns typed reachable repair and is never treated as accepted. It never infers
+semantic acceptance: an `approve` verdict is a recorded observation, and owner
+acceptance remains a separate owner-judgment.
+
+The same invocation with `--projection` emits, after successful verification, the
+exact branch-specific aggregate Test projection item for the record. A strict-v4
+record keeps the byte-compatible
+`{task_id, schema, evidence_ref, evidence_digest, task_review_session,
+task_review_summary_digest}` shape; an external-manual record carries
+`{task_id, schema, evidence_ref, evidence_digest, task_review_mode:
+"external-manual", task_review_receipt_ref, task_review_receipt_digest}` instead.
+Test, Status, and Deliver consume that mechanical result verbatim; a strict session
+identity can never substitute for the receipt fields and neither branch's
+projection is rewritten into the other's. The projection is withheld whenever any
+diagnostic is present.
+
+Aggregate Test, Status, and Deliver preserve and recheck the declared branch: strict
+items replay the retained strict summary through the existing waiter and transport
+consumers; external-manual items take the bounded stable receipt bytes, recompute
+`receipt_sha256`, and rerun the sensor's verify mode instead. An aggregate
+projection item for an external-manual task substitutes
+`task_review_mode: "external-manual"` plus `task_review_receipt_ref` and
+`task_review_receipt_digest` for the strict `task_review_session` and
+`task_review_summary_digest` fields; strict items keep their existing exact shape.
+No consumer may rewrite one branch into the other or accept a strict SUMMARY where
+the branch declares an external receipt.
+When the newest current-subject summary returns `REQUEST_CHANGES`, consume its exact
+validated `findings` array rather than a count or list copied from any historical summary.
+Preserve every finding id, resolve or authoritatively disposition every current P0/P1,
+and refresh each affected evidence reference before creating one fresh subject and
+review. The blocking disposition set binds only current P0/P1 findings (or a P2 the
+owner promoted after the current review reclassified it as P1 on evidence); P2 and P3
+findings stay recorded in the retained summary as non-blocking backlog and never block
+closeout, and no consumer may implicitly promote them to blockers inside the same task.
+A later summary may contain a different set; that current exact set controls
+recovery.
+After the final validated `SUMMARY.json`, independently capture the completion subject and immediately write one canonical `ultra-task-evidence-v2` record with its separate exact task-review binding.
+Write `completed` to the ledger only after every blocking finding has a disposition,
+relevant evidence is refreshed, the canonical record and context review facts are
+durable, and both are read back.
+
+If later work invalidates a completed task, reopening is an explicit recovery action.
+A reopen changes the ledger-authoritative row from `completed` to `in_progress`; there
+is no silent demotion. Before the transition, record the affected criterion IDs and reason in both the context Change Log and Resume Note. Preserve the prior frozen review
+as historical evidence, read the ledger write back, refresh only the affected evidence,
+obtain a new final review, then capture and publish a new completion subject.
+
+## Aggregate Test projection
+
+The v2 Test template carries ordered `task_evidence` immediately after `task_ids`.
+Every item is exactly:
+
+```json
+{
+  "task_id": "<task-id>",
+  "schema": "ultra-task-evidence-v2",
+  "evidence_ref": ".ultra/evidence/<task-id>/evidence.json",
+  "evidence_digest": "<sha256>",
+  "task_review_session": "<review-session>",
+  "task_review_summary_digest": "<sha256>"
+}
+```
+
+The evidence digest already binds `context.acceptance_sha256`; do not copy that field
+into the Test projection. Historical `ultra-task-evidence-v1` remains readable and is
+classified `legacy-v1`, but it cannot support a new v2 completion claim without an
+honest migration.
+
+The projection preserves each task's independently captured completion-snapshot
+freshness observation and its separate task-review provenance. Aggregate Test binds its
+report subject independently to the current whole Change; it never requires an earlier
+task `subject.worktree_digest` to equal that aggregate digest and never treats the
+retained task-review summary as proof of the completion subject. Instead it independently
+rechecks the current Acceptance bytes, typed criterion IDs and verification types,
+retained strict task-review summary, durable owner records, and every cited affected
+artifact. An invalidated item uses the explicit reopen path above.
+
+Run the structural sensor with:
+
+```bash
+node skills/ultra-plan/scripts/validate_task_evidence.cjs \
+  .ultra/evidence/<task-id>/evidence.json
+```
+
+The sensor resolves one input path and captures at most 8 MiB from a regular,
+non-symlink file opened nonblocking and no-follow where the platform supports it. It
+compares path and descriptor identity before and after the read, decodes the captured
+bytes as strict UTF-8, and parses JSON from that same snapshot. Typed `input_*`
+diagnostics return control for retry when the path is missing, replaced, oversized,
+non-regular, a symlink, invalid UTF-8, or invalid JSON.