typeclaw 0.37.2 → 0.37.4

package/src/channels/adapters/discord-bot.ts

@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ import {
   registerCommands,
   type DiscordCommandDeclaration,
 } from './discord-bot-slash-commands'
+import { addDiscordMentionHints, type DiscordMentionUser } from './mention-hints'
 
 // One declared slash command per logical agent gesture. /stop maps to the
 // existing channel-command of the same name in the router. Adding new
@@ -507,6 +508,7 @@ type DiscordRawHistoryMessage = {
   author: { id: string; username?: string; global_name?: string | null; bot?: boolean }
   content: string
   timestamp: string
+  mentions?: DiscordMentionUser[]
   message_reference?: { message_id?: string; channel_id?: string }
   attachments?: DiscordFile[]
   embeds?: DiscordGatewayEmbed[]
@@ -597,7 +599,7 @@ function mapDiscordMessage(msg: DiscordRawHistoryMessage, botUserId: string | nu
   // never resolve them. Mirror the classifier's splitInbound: bake placeholders
   // into text and carry the structured attachments so the router can resolve ids.
   const attachments = describeDiscordMedia(source)
-  const text = bodyOf(source)
+  const text = addDiscordMentionHints(bodyOf(source), mentionUserMap(source.mentions), { botUserId })
   return {
     externalMessageId: msg.id,
     authorId: source.author.id,
@@ -617,6 +619,10 @@ function bodyOf(msg: DiscordRawHistoryMessage): string {
   return msg.content === '' ? placeholders : `${msg.content}\n${placeholders}`
 }
 
+function mentionUserMap(mentions: readonly DiscordMentionUser[] | undefined): Map<string, DiscordMentionUser> {
+  return new Map((mentions ?? []).map((user) => [user.id, user]))
+}
+
 function clampLimit(requested: number, max: number): number {
   if (!Number.isFinite(requested) || requested <= 0) return max
   return Math.min(Math.floor(requested), max)
@@ -932,9 +938,10 @@ export function createDiscordBotAdapter(options: DiscordBotAdapterOptions): Disc
         return
       }
 
+      const hintedText = addDiscordMentionHints(verdict.payload.text, mentionUserMap(event.mentions), { botUserId })
       const replyMessageId = event.message_reference?.message_id
       const referenceResult = await enrichDiscordMessageReferences({
-        text: verdict.payload.text,
+        text: hintedText,
         ...(replyMessageId !== undefined
           ? { reply: { channelId: event.message_reference?.channel_id ?? event.channel_id, messageId: replyMessageId } }
           : {}),
@@ -950,8 +957,8 @@ export function createDiscordBotAdapter(options: DiscordBotAdapterOptions): Disc
       })
       const payload =
         referenceResult.referenceContext === undefined
-          ? verdict.payload
-          : { ...verdict.payload, referenceContext: referenceResult.referenceContext }
+          ? { ...verdict.payload, text: hintedText }
+          : { ...verdict.payload, text: hintedText, referenceContext: referenceResult.referenceContext }
 
       const routedTag = await formatChannelTag(payload.workspace, payload.chat)
       logger.info(

package/src/channels/adapters/mention-hints.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+export type DiscordMentionUser = { id: string; username?: string; global_name?: string | null }
+
+export type MentionHintOptions = { botUserId?: string | null }
+
+// Slack encodes user mentions as `<@U…>`/`<@W…>`, optionally with a native
+// `|label` fallback suffix. We capture the id and the whole token so the bare
+// `<@id>` can be reconstructed (dropping any legacy label) and a resolved hint
+// appended after it.
+const SLACK_MENTION_PATTERN = /<@([UW][A-Z0-9]+)(?:\|[^>]*)?>/g
+
+// Discord uses `<@id>` and the nickname form `<@!id>`; the `!` is optional and
+// irrelevant to the target user, so it is captured but discarded on rewrite.
+const DISCORD_MENTION_PATTERN = /<@!?(\d+)>/g
+
+export async function addSlackMentionHints(
+  text: string,
+  resolveUserName: (id: string) => Promise<string>,
+  options: MentionHintOptions = {},
+): Promise<string> {
+  const ids = new Set<string>()
+  for (const match of text.matchAll(SLACK_MENTION_PATTERN)) ids.add(match[1]!)
+  if (ids.size === 0) return text
+
+  const hints = new Map<string, string>()
+  await Promise.all(
+    Array.from(ids).map(async (id) => {
+      const hint = resolveHint(id, await resolveUserName(id), options.botUserId)
+      if (hint !== null) hints.set(id, hint)
+    }),
+  )
+
+  return text.replace(SLACK_MENTION_PATTERN, (_token, id: string) => renderToken(id, hints.get(id)))
+}
+
+export function addDiscordMentionHints(
+  text: string,
+  usersById: Map<string, DiscordMentionUser>,
+  options: MentionHintOptions = {},
+): string {
+  return text.replace(DISCORD_MENTION_PATTERN, (token, id: string) => {
+    const user = usersById.get(id)
+    const name = user === undefined ? id : (user.global_name ?? user.username ?? id)
+    const hint = resolveHint(id, name, options.botUserId)
+    return hint === null ? token : `${token} (${hint})`
+  })
+}
+
+function resolveHint(id: string, resolvedName: string, botUserId: string | null | undefined): string | null {
+  if (id === botUserId) return 'you'
+  // The resolver echoes the id back when it cannot find a name; a bare id is
+  // not a useful hint, so leave the token unannotated in that case.
+  if (resolvedName === id || resolvedName === '') return null
+  return resolvedName
+}
+
+function renderToken(id: string, hint: string | undefined): string {
+  return hint === undefined ? `<@${id}>` : `<@${id}> (${hint})`
+}

package/src/channels/adapters/slack-bot.ts

@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ import type {
 } from '@/channels/types'
 import { chunkMarkdown } from '@/markdown'
 
+import { addSlackMentionHints } from './mention-hints'
 import { createSlackAuthorResolver, type SlackAuthorResolver } from './slack-bot-author-resolver'
 import { createSlackChannelResolver } from './slack-bot-channel-resolver'
 import {
@@ -703,11 +704,14 @@ export function createSlackHistoryCallback(deps: {
     // users.info entry. The resolver caches/coalesces, so repeated authors
     // cost one lookup each.
     if (authorResolver !== undefined) {
+      const resolver = authorResolver
+      const botId = botUserIdRef()
       await Promise.all(
         mapped.map(async (message, index) => {
+          message.text = await addSlackMentionHints(message.text, resolver.resolve, { botUserId: botId })
           const userId = rawMessages[index]?.user
           if (userId === undefined || userId === '') return
-          message.authorName = await authorResolver.resolve(userId)
+          message.authorName = await resolver.resolve(userId)
         }),
       )
     }
@@ -1133,9 +1137,10 @@ export function createSlackBotAdapter(options: SlackBotAdapterOptions): SlackBot
       }
 
       dedupe.mark(event)
+      const hintedText = await addSlackMentionHints(verdict.payload.text, authorResolver.resolve, { botUserId })
       const slackAttachments = Array.isArray(event.attachments) ? event.attachments : undefined
       const referenceResult = await enrichSlackReferenceContext({
-        text: verdict.payload.text,
+        text: hintedText,
         channelId: event.channel,
         messageTs: event.ts,
         ...(slackAttachments !== undefined ? { attachments: slackAttachments } : {}),
@@ -1143,6 +1148,7 @@ export function createSlackBotAdapter(options: SlackBotAdapterOptions): SlackBot
       })
       const enriched = {
         ...verdict.payload,
+        text: hintedText,
         authorName: resolvedUserName,
         ...(referenceResult.referenceContext !== undefined
           ? { referenceContext: referenceResult.referenceContext }

package/src/channels/continuation-willingness.ts

@@ -13,6 +13,14 @@
 // descriptive ("I checked and it's fine") or other-directed ("you can continue")
 // usage. This is a HINT, not a control-flow authority: the abort still fires
 // regardless; only the optional nudge is gated on it.
+//
+// Detection is two-pass: a phrase-substring pass (ALL_PHRASES) for analytic
+// languages where future intent is a separate word ("I'll", "voy a", "我会"),
+// plus a morpheme pass (MORPHEME_PATTERNS + the Japanese check) for languages
+// where it is a verb inflection/affix. The morpheme pass matches the marker
+// itself, so it generalizes across EVERY action verb (update/configure/fix/…)
+// instead of enumerating each — what the per-verb KO/TR/HI/JA lists used to do
+// by hand.
 
 // Strip markdown emphasis/code fences before matching so an inline `gh` span
 // inside "바로 `gh`로 확인할게요" does not split the phrase.
@@ -48,51 +56,94 @@ const EN_PHRASES: readonly string[] = [
   'looking into it now',
   'working on it now',
   'on it now',
+  "i'm on it",
   'give me a moment',
   'give me a sec',
+  // Parity additions for common first-person-future acks: "investigate / look up
+  // / pull up" are work-verb siblings of the "look into / dig in" entries above,
+  // and "lemme" is the contracted "let me" that chat models routinely emit.
+  "i'll investigate",
+  "i'll look it up",
+  "i'll pull that up",
+  "i'll pull it up",
+  'let me pull',
+  'lemme check',
+  'lemme look',
+  'lemme take a look',
+  // Action/config verb family. The retrieval verbs above ("check/look/look up")
+  // miss the much larger class of "I'll DO X" promises — update/configure/set up/
+  // schedule/fix/apply/create — which is exactly the class that silently truncates
+  // when the model forgets `continue: true` (the cron-update production miss).
+  "i'll update",
+  "i'll set up",
+  "i'll set it up",
+  "i'll configure",
+  "i'll schedule",
+  "i'll fix",
+  "i'll apply",
+  "i'll add",
+  "i'll create",
+  "i'll handle",
+  'let me update',
+  'let me fix',
+  'let me set up',
+  'let me configure',
+  'let me add',
+  'let me create',
+  'let me handle',
 ]
 
-// Korean: -ㄹ게요 / -겠습니다 future-volitional endings on check/look/continue/
-// proceed verbs. These endings are first-person volitional in Korean — they
-// cannot address the listener, so they are safe self-direction anchors that
-// descriptive or other-directed sentences do not produce. Bare "계속" is
-// excluded ("계속 진행하세요" = "you go ahead", terminal).
+// Korean: the -겠습니다/-겠어요 and -ㄹ게요 verb endings are first-person
+// volitional — they cannot address the listener, so they are safe self-direction
+// anchors. The -겠습니다/-겠어요 form is matched by MORPHEME_PATTERNS below (it
+// generalizes across all action verbs), so only the -게요/-게여 forms and stall
+// idioms are enumerated here. Bare adverb+noun fragments ("바로 확인", "계속 확인",
+// "곧 알려") are deliberately NOT listed: without the volitional ending they match
+// other-directed requests ("바로 확인 부탁드려요" = "please check") and descriptive
+// progressives ("계속 확인 중입니다" = "I'm still checking") — the exact false
+// positives the design forbids. Their volitional forms are caught by the morpheme
+// regex regardless.
 const KO_PHRASES: readonly string[] = [
   '확인해볼게요',
   '확인해 볼게요',
   '확인할게요',
-  '확인하겠습니다',
-  '확인해보겠습니다',
-  '확인해 보겠습니다',
-  '다시 확인하겠습니다',
-  '다시 확인해보겠습니다',
-  '이어서 확인',
-  '계속 확인',
+  '확인할게여',
   '계속 진행할게요',
-  '계속 진행하겠습니다',
-  '계속하겠습니다',
   '계속할게요',
-  '바로 확인',
   '바로 볼게요',
-  '바로 진행',
   '살펴볼게요',
-  '살펴보겠습니다',
-  '진행하겠습니다',
+  '볼게요',
+  '볼게여',
+  '검토할게요',
+  '검토해볼게요',
+  '조회해볼게요',
+  '찾아볼게요',
+  '알아볼게요',
+  '처리할게요',
+  '알려드릴게요',
+  // Action/config verb -게요 forms (the -겠습니다 siblings are covered by the
+  // morpheme regex; these are the casual-polite variants chat models also emit).
+  '업데이트할게요',
+  '수정할게요',
+  '설정할게요',
+  '반영할게요',
+  '적용할게요',
+  '추가할게요',
+  '생성할게요',
   '잠시만요',
   '잠깐만요',
-  '곧 알려',
 ]
 
 // The remaining languages mirror the precision-first selection above: every
 // entry pairs a FIRST-PERSON future/volitional anchor with a work verb
-// (check/look/continue/proceed/verify) or is an immediate-work idiom ("on it
-// now"). The same false-negative bias holds — bare verbs, bare acknowledgments
-// ("ok", "sí", "好"), second-person imperatives ("you continue"), and
-// descriptive past forms ("I checked") are deliberately excluded because a
-// substring match on those would mis-fire. Latin/Cyrillic/Arabic/Indic entries
-// are inflected first-person-future forms (or multi-word) so they cannot
-// collide with a bare common word; CJK entries are full 4+ character
-// intent phrases, never a lone noun.
+// (check/look/continue/proceed/verify or update/configure/fix/create) or is an
+// immediate-work idiom ("on it now"). The same false-negative bias holds — bare
+// verbs, bare acknowledgments ("ok", "sí", "好"), second-person imperatives ("you
+// continue"), and descriptive past forms ("I checked") are deliberately excluded
+// because a substring match on those would mis-fire. Latin/Cyrillic/Arabic/Indic
+// entries are inflected first-person-future forms (or multi-word) so they cannot
+// collide with a bare common word; CJK entries are full 4+ character intent
+// phrases, never a lone noun.
 
 // Spanish: "voy a" / "déjame" + work verb; "enseguida" (right away) idioms.
 const ES_PHRASES: readonly string[] = [
@@ -106,6 +157,12 @@ const ES_PHRASES: readonly string[] = [
   'déjame comprobar',
   'déjame verificar',
   'déjame mirar',
+  'voy a echar un vistazo',
+  'déjame echar un vistazo',
+  'ahora lo reviso',
+  'ahora reviso',
+  'ahora lo verifico',
+  'ahora mismo lo reviso',
   'lo reviso enseguida',
   'lo verifico enseguida',
   'enseguida lo reviso',
@@ -113,6 +170,17 @@ const ES_PHRASES: readonly string[] = [
   'un momento',
   'dame un momento',
   'dame un segundo',
+  // Action/config verb family.
+  'voy a actualizar',
+  'voy a configurar',
+  'voy a corregir',
+  'voy a arreglar',
+  'voy a crear',
+  'voy a añadir',
+  'voy a programar',
+  'voy a aplicar',
+  'déjame actualizar',
+  'déjame corregir',
 ]
 
 // French: "je vais" + work verb; "laisse-moi" idioms.
@@ -123,13 +191,28 @@ const FR_PHRASES: readonly string[] = [
   'je vais poursuivre',
   'je vais voir',
   'je vais contrôler',
+  'je vais creuser',
+  'je vais jeter un œil',
   'laisse-moi vérifier',
   'laisse-moi regarder',
+  'laisse-moi jeter un œil',
   'je vérifie tout de suite',
   'je regarde tout de suite',
+  'je regarde ça tout de suite',
+  'je regarde ça',
   'un instant',
   'donne-moi un instant',
   'donne-moi une seconde',
+  // Action/config verb family.
+  'je vais mettre à jour',
+  'je vais configurer',
+  'je vais corriger',
+  'je vais créer',
+  'je vais ajouter',
+  'je vais programmer',
+  'je vais appliquer',
+  'laisse-moi corriger',
+  'laisse-moi mettre à jour',
 ]
 
 // Italian: "vado a" / "fammi" + work verb; "controllo subito" idioms.
@@ -137,15 +220,28 @@ const IT_PHRASES: readonly string[] = [
   'vado a controllare',
   'vado a verificare',
   'vado a guardare',
+  "vado a dare un'occhiata",
   'fammi controllare',
   'fammi verificare',
   'fammi guardare',
+  "fammi dare un'occhiata",
+  "do un'occhiata",
   'controllo subito',
   'verifico subito',
   'continuo subito',
+  'guardo subito',
   'un momento',
   'dammi un momento',
   'dammi un secondo',
+  // Action/config verb family.
+  'vado ad aggiornare',
+  'vado a configurare',
+  'vado a correggere',
+  'vado a creare',
+  'vado ad aggiungere',
+  'vado ad applicare',
+  'fammi aggiornare',
+  'fammi correggere',
 ]
 
 // Portuguese: "vou" + work verb; "deixa eu" idioms.
@@ -156,14 +252,26 @@ const PT_PHRASES: readonly string[] = [
   'vou olhar',
   'vou continuar',
   'vou prosseguir',
+  'vou dar uma olhada',
   'deixa eu verificar',
   'deixa eu conferir',
   'deixa eu olhar',
+  'deixa eu dar uma olhada',
   'verifico já',
   'já verifico',
   'um momento',
   'me dê um momento',
   'me dá um segundo',
+  // Action/config verb family.
+  'vou atualizar',
+  'vou configurar',
+  'vou corrigir',
+  'vou criar',
+  'vou adicionar',
+  'vou agendar',
+  'vou aplicar',
+  'deixa eu atualizar',
+  'deixa eu corrigir',
 ]
 
 // German: "ich werde" / "lass mich" + work verb; "ich schaue gleich" idioms.
@@ -175,18 +283,35 @@ const DE_PHRASES: readonly string[] = [
   'ich werde fortfahren',
   'lass mich prüfen',
   'lass mich nachsehen',
+  'lass mich schauen',
   'ich schaue gleich',
+  'ich schaue mir das an',
+  'ich schaue mir das mal an',
   'ich prüfe gleich',
+  'ich prüfe das gleich',
+  'ich sehe gleich nach',
   'gleich prüfen',
   'gleich überprüfen',
   'gleich nachsehen',
   'einen moment',
   'einen augenblick',
   'gib mir eine sekunde',
+  // Action/config verb family.
+  'ich werde aktualisieren',
+  'ich werde konfigurieren',
+  'ich werde korrigieren',
+  'ich werde einrichten',
+  'ich werde erstellen',
+  'ich werde hinzufügen',
+  'ich werde anwenden',
+  'lass mich aktualisieren',
+  'lass mich korrigieren',
 ]
 
 // Russian: first-person-future verbs (проверю/посмотрю/продолжу) — the -ю/-у
-// inflection is unambiguously "I will", so it is a safe self-anchor.
+// inflection is unambiguously "I will", so it is a safe self-anchor. (Note: the
+// bare -ю ending is shared with present-imperfective "я делаю" = "I do", so this
+// stays an enumerated list rather than a morpheme regex.)
 const RU_PHRASES: readonly string[] = [
   'сейчас проверю',
   'я проверю',
@@ -194,9 +319,20 @@ const RU_PHRASES: readonly string[] = [
   'я продолжу',
   'продолжу проверку',
   'сейчас посмотрю',
+  'дай мне проверить',
+  'дайте мне проверить',
   'дайте мне минуту',
   'одну секунду',
   'минутку',
+  // Action/config verb family (perfective first-person futures).
+  'я обновлю',
+  'я настрою',
+  'я исправлю',
+  'я создам',
+  'я добавлю',
+  'я применю',
+  'сейчас обновлю',
+  'сейчас исправлю',
 ]
 
 // Chinese: 我会/我来/我再 + work verb. Full multi-character intent phrases only;
@@ -214,28 +350,45 @@ const ZH_PHRASES: readonly string[] = [
   '我马上确认',
   '我马上检查',
   '我马上看',
+  '让我看看',
+  '让我查一下',
+  '让我确认一下',
+  '让我检查一下',
   '稍等一下',
   '我看一下',
+  // Action/config verb family.
+  '我来更新',
+  '我会更新',
+  '我来配置',
+  '我来设置',
+  '我会设置',
+  '我来修改',
+  '我会修改',
+  '我来修复',
+  '我来创建',
+  '我来添加',
+  '我马上更新',
+  '让我更新',
+  '让我改一下',
 ]
 
-// Japanese: -てみます / -します first-person volitional on check/look/continue.
-// Bare nouns (確認) are excluded; the verb ending carries the self-direction.
+// Japanese: handled by the JA_VOLITIONAL morpheme check below (-します/-いたします/
+// -してみます generalizes across all する action verbs). Only the regular-verb
+// ます forms (調べます/見てみます/続けます — bare ます is too broad to regex) and
+// stall idioms are enumerated here.
 const JA_PHRASES: readonly string[] = [
-  '確認します',
-  '確認してみます',
-  '確認いたします',
   '調べてみます',
   '調べます',
   '見てみます',
   '続けます',
-  '引き続き確認します',
-  'すぐ確認します',
   '少々お待ちください',
   'ちょっと待ってください',
 ]
 
 // Arabic: future particle سـ prefixed first-person verb (سأتحقق = "I will
-// verify"). The سأ prefix is unambiguously first-person-future.
+// verify"). The سأ prefix is first-person-future, but as a bare substring it
+// collides with the root س-أ-ل ("ask": سألت "I asked", المسألة "the matter"), so
+// this stays an enumerated list of full verbs rather than a سأ-prefix regex.
 const AR_PHRASES: readonly string[] = [
   'سأتحقق',
   'سأتأكد',
@@ -246,27 +399,31 @@ const AR_PHRASES: readonly string[] = [
   'دعني أتحقق',
   'دعني أراجع',
   'لحظة من فضلك',
+  // Action/config verb family.
+  'سأحدث',
+  'سأحدّث',
+  'سأعدل',
+  'سأعدّل',
+  'سأضبط',
+  'سأصلح',
+  'سأنشئ',
+  'سأضيف',
 ]
 
-// Hindi: first-person-future "मैं … करूँगा/देखूँगा" forms (multi-word so they
-// cannot collide with a bare common word).
-const HI_PHRASES: readonly string[] = [
-  'जाँच करूँगा',
-  'जांच करूंगा',
-  'देख लूँगा',
-  'देख लूंगा',
-  'जारी रखूँगा',
-  'जारी रखूंगा',
-  'एक मिनट रुकिए',
-]
+// Hindi: first-person-future is the -ūṅgā/-ūṅgī suffix, matched by
+// MORPHEME_PATTERNS below (it covers all X-करना compounds). Only the stall idiom
+// is enumerated here.
+const HI_PHRASES: readonly string[] = ['एक मिनट रुकिए']
 
-// Turkish: first-person-future "-eceğim/-acağım" on check/look/continue verbs.
+// Turkish: first-person-future "-eceğim/-acağım" is matched by MORPHEME_PATTERNS
+// below. The present-progressive ("ediyorum" = "I'm checking now"), optative
+// ("bir bakayım" = "let me look"), and stall idioms stay enumerated — the
+// progressive -ıyorum ending is too polysemous to regex ("biliyorum" = "I know").
 const TR_PHRASES: readonly string[] = [
-  'kontrol edeceğim',
   'kontrol ediyorum',
-  'bakacağım',
-  'inceleyeceğim',
-  'devam edeceğim',
+  'bir bakayım',
+  'bir kontrol edeyim',
+  'kontrol edeyim',
   'hemen kontrol ediyorum',
   'hemen bakıyorum',
   'bir saniye',
@@ -284,6 +441,14 @@ const VI_PHRASES: readonly string[] = [
   'tôi xem ngay',
   'chờ một chút',
   'đợi một chút',
+  // Action/config verb family.
+  'tôi sẽ cập nhật',
+  'tôi sẽ cấu hình',
+  'tôi sẽ sửa',
+  'tôi sẽ tạo',
+  'tôi sẽ thêm',
+  'để tôi cập nhật',
+  'để tôi sửa',
 ]
 
 // Indonesian: "saya akan" / "biar saya" (I will / let me) + work verb.
@@ -298,6 +463,16 @@ const ID_PHRASES: readonly string[] = [
   'saya periksa dulu',
   'tunggu sebentar',
   'sebentar ya',
+  // Action/config verb family.
+  'saya akan perbarui',
+  'saya akan memperbarui',
+  'saya akan atur',
+  'saya akan konfigurasi',
+  'saya akan perbaiki',
+  'saya akan buat',
+  'saya akan tambah',
+  'biar saya perbaiki',
+  'biar saya perbarui',
 ]
 
 const ALL_PHRASES: readonly string[] = [
@@ -318,6 +493,41 @@ const ALL_PHRASES: readonly string[] = [
   ...ID_PHRASES,
 ]
 
+// First-person future/volitional realized as a verb inflection or affix (not a
+// separate word), so matching the marker generalizes across ALL action verbs.
+const MORPHEME_PATTERNS: readonly RegExp[] = [
+  // Korean first-person volitional: a verb stem + -겠습니다/-겠어요. The stem must
+  // be one of the action/auxiliary verbs 하 (the 하다 light verb behind every
+  // X하다 — 업데이트하겠습니다/반영하겠어요), 보 (살펴보겠습니다), 두 (반영해두겠습니다), or
+  // 놓 (해놓겠습니다). Anchoring on the verb stem is what keeps this self-directed:
+  // bare 겠 also matches adjective-stem CONJECTURE (좋겠어요 "that'd be nice",
+  // 괜찮겠어요 "must be fine") and the idioms 알겠/모르겠, none of which promise work.
+  // Listener-directed conjecture takes the honorific 시 (피곤하시겠어요 → 시겠, not
+  // 하겠), so it is excluded too.
+  /(?:하|보|두|놓)겠(?:습니다|어요)/,
+  // Turkish first-person-singular future "-acağım/-eceğim" ("I will VERB").
+  // Vowel harmony yields exactly these two suffixes; the y-buffer
+  // ("bekleyeceğim") leaves the suffix intact.
+  /acağım|eceğim/,
+  // Hindi first-person future "-ūṅgā/-ūṅgī" on any verb, covering all X-करना
+  // compounds ("अपडेट करूँगा"). Both nasal spellings (ँ U+0901 / ं U+0902) and
+  // both genders (ा/ी) are included.
+  /ू[ँं]ग[ाी]/,
+]
+
+// Japanese する-verb volitional します/いたします/してみます — covers the action class
+// (更新します/設定します/対応します). Bare ます is the universal polite verb ending and
+// far too broad to match, so this keys on します specifically. Two request/greeting
+// idioms end in します without being work intent — お願い(いた)します ("please") and
+// 失礼します ("excuse me") — and are stripped before the test so they don't fire.
+// The (?![か？?]) lookahead drops question forms — both the か question particle
+// (どうしますか "what should I do?") and a trailing question mark, fullwidth ？ or
+// ASCII ? (どうします？, 更新します？ "shall I update?"). A question awaits the user;
+// it is not a commitment to act this turn. A statement keeps its 。/, so
+// 更新します。 still matches.
+const JA_VOLITIONAL_IDIOMS = /お願い(?:いた)?します|失礼します/g
+const JA_VOLITIONAL = /します(?![か？?])|してみます(?![か？?])/
+
 // Reply texts shorter than this are almost always a complete final answer
 // ("네", "ok", "done") where a partial match would be noise. The shortest
 // legitimate intent phrases ("on it now", "확인할게요") clear this floor.
@@ -327,5 +537,7 @@ export function detectContinuationWillingness(text: string): boolean {
   if (text.length < MIN_LENGTH) return false
   const normalized = normalize(text)
   if (normalized.length < MIN_LENGTH) return false
-  return ALL_PHRASES.some((phrase) => normalized.includes(phrase))
+  if (ALL_PHRASES.some((phrase) => normalized.includes(phrase))) return true
+  if (MORPHEME_PATTERNS.some((pattern) => pattern.test(normalized))) return true
+  return JA_VOLITIONAL.test(normalized.replace(JA_VOLITIONAL_IDIOMS, ''))
 }