triflux 10.9.21 → 10.9.22

package/skills/tfx-workspace/iteration-1/codex-gemini-remap/old_skill/outputs/analysis.md

@@ -1,154 +0,0 @@
-# tfx-codex 라우팅 분석 — DRY RUN
-
-**요청**: `/tfx-codex API 문서를 작성하고 디자인 가이드도 만들어줘`
-**분석 기준 SKILL**: `skills/tfx-workspace/skill-snapshot/tfx-codex/SKILL.md`
-
----
-
-## 1. 에이전트 리매핑 테이블
-
-이 요청은 두 개의 독립 서브태스크로 분해됩니다:
-- 서브태스크 A: "API 문서를 작성" → **writer** 역할
-- 서브태스크 B: "디자인 가이드도 만들어줘" → **designer** 역할
-
-| 에이전트 | 원래 CLI (tfx-auto) | tfx-codex에서 | effort 파라미터 | MCP 프로필 |
-|----------|---------------------|---------------|-----------------|-----------|
-| **writer** | ~~Gemini~~ (`docs` MCP) | **Codex** (effort: spark_fast) — Codex Spark 경량 문서 | `spark_fast` | `analyze` |
-| **designer** | ~~Gemini~~ (`docs` MCP) | **Codex** (effort: high) — UI 코드 생성 | `high` | `implement` |
-
-### 원본 tfx-auto 기준 (리매핑 전)
-
-`tfx-auto` SKILL.md의 에이전트 매핑 테이블에서:
-
-```
-| gemini / designer / writer | Gemini | docs |
-```
-
-즉, 원래 두 역할 모두 Gemini CLI + `docs` MCP로 실행됩니다.
-
-### tfx-codex 기준 (리매핑 후)
-
-`tfx-codex` SKILL.md의 에이전트 라우팅 테이블에서:
-
-```
-| designer | ~~Gemini~~ | Codex (effort: high) — UI 코드 생성     | implement |
-| writer   | ~~Gemini~~ | Codex Spark (effort: spark_fast) — 경량 문서 | analyze   |
-```
-
----
-
-## 2. TFX_CLI_MODE 환경변수
-
-```
-TFX_CLI_MODE=codex
-```
-
-이 환경변수는 tfx-route.sh에 전달되어 Gemini 에이전트가 선택될 경우 Codex로 강제 교체하도록 지시합니다. Phase 2 트리아지에서 Codex 분류기가 `gemini`를 반환하더라도 이 값에 의해 `codex`로 교체됩니다.
-
----
-
-## 3. Phase 2 트리아지 동작
-
-**자동 모드** (`/tfx-codex "API 문서를 작성하고 디자인 가이드도 만들어줘"`):
-
-1. **Codex 분류** (`--full-auto --skip-git-repo-check`):
-   - 입력 파싱 결과 예상 JSON:
-     ```json
-     {
-       "parts": [
-         { "description": "API 문서 작성", "agent": "gemini" },
-         { "description": "디자인 가이드 생성", "agent": "gemini" }
-       ]
-     }
-     ```
-   - `TFX_CLI_MODE=codex` 적용 → 두 항목 모두 `"gemini"` → **`"codex"`로 강제 교체**
-
-2. **Opus 인라인 분해** (강제 변환 이후):
-   - `writer` 역할: MCP 프로필 `analyze` 할당
-   - `designer` 역할: MCP 프로필 `implement` 할당
-   - 두 서브태스크는 독립적(INDEPENDENT), `graph_type: "INDEPENDENT"`
-
-3. **서브태스크 수 = 2** → tfx-multi Native Teams 모드로 자동 전환 (tfx-auto 규칙: 2개 이상 시 tfx-multi Phase 3)
-
----
-
-## 4. 생성되는 Bash 커맨드 (서브태스크별)
-
-서브태스크가 2개이므로 tfx-multi Phase 3a(TeamCreate) → Phase 3b(TaskCreate) → Phase 3c(Agent 래퍼 spawn) 순서로 실행됩니다. 각 Agent 래퍼 내부에서 다음 Bash 커맨드가 실행됩니다:
-
-### 서브태스크 A — writer (API 문서 작성)
-
-```bash
-TFX_CLI_MODE=codex bash ~/.claude/scripts/tfx-route.sh writer 'API 문서를 작성해줘' analyze
-```
-
-- `writer` 에이전트: Codex Spark (`effort: spark_fast`) 로 실행
-- MCP 프로필: `analyze` (문서 기반 리서치+작성)
-- `run_in_background=true` (INDEPENDENT 병렬 실행)
-
-### 서브태스크 B — designer (디자인 가이드 생성)
-
-```bash
-TFX_CLI_MODE=codex bash ~/.claude/scripts/tfx-route.sh designer '디자인 가이드를 만들어줘' implement
-```
-
-- `designer` 에이전트: Codex (`effort: high`) 로 실행
-- MCP 프로필: `implement` (코드 기반 UI 작업)
-- `run_in_background=true` (INDEPENDENT 병렬 실행)
-
-> 두 서브태스크는 `depends_on` 없이 Level 0에서 병렬 실행됩니다.
-
----
-
-## 5. MCP 프로필 변화 상세
-
-| 에이전트 | tfx-auto 원본 MCP | tfx-codex 변경 후 MCP | 변경 이유 |
-|----------|-------------------|----------------------|----------|
-| **writer** | `docs` | `analyze` | Gemini → Codex 전환 시 문서 리서치+작성에 적합한 `analyze` 프로필 사용 |
-| **designer** | `docs` | `implement` | Gemini → Codex 전환 시 UI 코드 생성에 적합한 `implement` 프로필 사용 |
-
-원래 `docs` MCP는 Gemini CLI의 웹 검색/문서 접근 기능을 전제로 설계되었습니다. Codex로 리매핑 시 각 역할의 실제 작업 성격에 맞는 프로필로 교체됩니다.
-
----
-
-## 6. 워크플로우 레퍼런스
-
-**tfx-codex는 tfx-auto SKILL.md의 Phase 1~6 전체를 그대로 따릅니다.**
-
-```
-Phase 1: 입력 파싱 — 트리거 `/tfx-codex` 인식, 인자 추출
-Phase 2: 트리아지
-  - Codex 분류 실행 (TFX_CLI_MODE=codex)
-  - gemini 반환값 → codex 강제 교체
-  - Opus 인라인 분해 (writer→analyze MCP, designer→implement MCP)
-Phase 3: CLI 실행
-  - TFX_CLI_MODE=codex 환경변수 포함
-  - tfx-route.sh 호출
-  - 서브태스크 2개 → tfx-multi Phase 3 전환
-Phase 4: 결과 수집
-  - exit_code 0: === OUTPUT === 섹션 파싱
-  - exit_code 124: === PARTIAL OUTPUT === 사용
-  - 그 외: STDERR → Claude fallback
-Phase 5: 실패 처리
-  - 1차: Claude executor(sonnet) fallback
-  - 2차: 실패 보고 + 성공 결과만 종합
-Phase 6: 보고 형식 출력
-  - 모드/그래프/레벨/서브태스크 상태 테이블
-  - Token Savings Report
-```
-
-**핵심 차이점 요약**: Phase 2와 Phase 3에서만 동작이 달라집니다.
-- Phase 2: gemini 분류 결과를 codex로 강제 변환 + MCP 프로필 재할당
-- Phase 3: 모든 tfx-route.sh 호출에 `TFX_CLI_MODE=codex` 접두 추가
-
----
-
-## 7. 요약
-
-이 요청(`/tfx-codex API 문서를 작성하고 디자인 가이드도 만들어줘`)은 다음과 같이 처리됩니다:
-
-1. 두 서브태스크로 분해 (INDEPENDENT 그래프)
-2. 원래 Gemini로 라우팅될 `writer`와 `designer` 모두 Codex로 리매핑
-3. MCP 프로필: writer → `analyze`, designer → `implement` (원본 `docs`에서 변경)
-4. 서브태스크 2개이므로 tfx-multi Native Teams 모드로 자동 전환하여 병렬 실행
-5. 전체 Phase 1~6은 tfx-auto 워크플로우를 그대로 따름

package/skills/tfx-workspace/iteration-1/codex-gemini-remap/old_skill/timing.json

@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "total_tokens": 19802,
-  "duration_ms": 85239,
-  "total_duration_seconds": 85.2
-}

package/skills/tfx-workspace/iteration-1/codex-gemini-remap/with_skill/grading.json

@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "expectations": [
-    {
-      "text": "designer remapped to Codex with effort: high",
-      "passed": true,
-      "evidence": "Agent output: designer → Codex (effort: high)"
-    },
-    {
-      "text": "writer remapped to Codex Spark with effort: spark_fast",
-      "passed": true,
-      "evidence": "Agent output: writer → Codex Spark (effort: spark_fast)"
-    },
-    {
-      "text": "Sets TFX_CLI_MODE=codex environment variable",
-      "passed": true,
-      "evidence": "Agent output: 'TFX_CLI_MODE: Set to codex for every Phase 3 call'"
-    },
-    {
-      "text": "Changes MCP profile: designer->implement, writer->analyze",
-      "passed": true,
-      "evidence": "Agent output: writer→analyze, designer→implement (changed from docs)"
-    }
-  ],
-  "summary": { "passed": 4, "failed": 0, "total": 4, "pass_rate": 1.0 }
-}

package/skills/tfx-workspace/iteration-1/codex-gemini-remap/with_skill/outputs/analysis.md

@@ -1,126 +0,0 @@
-# tfx-codex Routing Analysis — DRY RUN
-
-**User Request:** `/tfx-codex API 문서를 작성하고 디자인 가이드도 만들어줘`
-
-**Skill Definition Source:** `skills/tfx-codex/SKILL.md`
-
----
-
-## 1. Trigger Matching
-
-The command prefix `/tfx-codex` matches the skill trigger `tfx-codex` exactly.
-The skill is invoked with the argument: `"API 문서를 작성하고 디자인 가이드도 만들어줘"`
-
----
-
-## 2. TFX_CLI_MODE Environment Variable
-
-```
-TFX_CLI_MODE=codex
-```
-
-This variable is set for every CLI execution in Phase 3. It forces `tfx-route.sh` to substitute
-any `gemini` classification with `codex`, ensuring Gemini CLI is never called.
-
----
-
-## 3. Task Decomposition (Phase 2 Triage)
-
-The user request contains two distinct subtasks:
-
-| # | Subtask | Natural Agent Assignment | tfx-codex Override |
-|---|---------|-------------------------|--------------------|
-| 1 | API 문서를 작성 (Write API documentation) | **writer** (originally Gemini) | **Codex Spark** |
-| 2 | 디자인 가이드도 만들어줘 (Create design guide) | **designer** (originally Gemini) | **Codex** (effort: high) |
-
-During Phase 2, the Opus decomposition step detects that both subtasks would ordinarily route to
-Gemini-backed roles. The `TFX_CLI_MODE=codex` override forces:
-- Any `gemini` classification result → replaced with `codex`
-- `designer` and `writer` agent types → mapped to Codex with adjusted MCP profiles
-
----
-
-## 4. Agent Remapping Table
-
-| 에이전트 | 원래 CLI | tfx-codex 매핑 | effort 플래그 |
-|----------|---------|---------------|--------------|
-| **designer** | ~~Gemini~~ | **Codex** | `effort: high` — UI/시각 코드 생성 |
-| **writer** | ~~Gemini~~ | **Codex Spark** | `effort: spark_fast` — 경량 문서 작성 |
-| executor, build-fixer, debugger | Codex | Codex | 변경 없음 |
-| architect, planner, critic, analyst | Codex | Codex | 변경 없음 |
-| code-reviewer, security-reviewer | Codex | Codex | 변경 없음 |
-| scientist, document-specialist | Codex | Codex | 변경 없음 |
-| explore | Claude Haiku | Claude Haiku | 변경 없음 |
-| verifier, test-engineer | Claude Sonnet | Claude Sonnet | 변경 없음 |
-
----
-
-## 5. MCP Profile Changes for designer and writer
-
-| 에이전트 | 기본 MCP 프로필 | tfx-codex MCP 프로필 | 이유 |
-|----------|--------------|---------------------|------|
-| **designer** | (Gemini 전용 — 없음) | `implement` | 코드 기반 UI 작업으로 처리 |
-| **writer** | (Gemini 전용 — 없음) | `analyze` | 문서 기반 리서치 + 작성 워크플로우 |
-
-Both roles lose access to Gemini's multimodal/creative profile and are instead assigned
-Codex-compatible MCP profiles that match the nature of the work:
-- `implement` for designer: treats the design guide as a code artifact (e.g., CSS, component specs)
-- `analyze` for writer: treats API documentation as a research-and-summarize task
-
----
-
-## 6. Exact Bash Commands Generated (Phase 3)
-
-### Subtask 1 — writer: API 문서 작성
-
-```bash
-TFX_CLI_MODE=codex bash ~/.claude/scripts/tfx-route.sh writer 'API 문서를 작성해줘' analyze
-```
-
-- Agent: `writer` → remapped to **Codex Spark** (`effort: spark_fast`)
-- MCP Profile: `analyze`
-- The `tfx-route.sh` script reads `TFX_CLI_MODE=codex` and substitutes the Gemini path with
-  a Codex Spark invocation.
-
-### Subtask 2 — designer: 디자인 가이드 작성
-
-```bash
-TFX_CLI_MODE=codex bash ~/.claude/scripts/tfx-route.sh designer '디자인 가이드를 만들어줘' implement
-```
-
-- Agent: `designer` → remapped to **Codex** (`effort: high`)
-- MCP Profile: `implement`
-- The `tfx-route.sh` script reads `TFX_CLI_MODE=codex` and substitutes the Gemini path with
-  a full-effort Codex invocation.
-
----
-
-## 7. Workflow Reference — tfx-auto Phases Followed
-
-Per the skill definition: *"tfx-auto SKILL.md의 전체 워크플로우(커맨드 숏컷 → 트리아지 → 실행 → 결과 파싱 → 보고)를 그대로 따릅니다."*
-
-The exact same phase sequence as `tfx-auto` is executed:
-
-| Phase | Name | tfx-codex 특이사항 |
-|-------|------|--------------------|
-| Phase 1 | 커맨드 숏컷 파싱 | 동일 (`N:codex` 숏컷 지원) |
-| Phase 2 | 트리아지 (Opus 분해) | `gemini` 분류 결과를 `codex`로 강제 변환; designer/writer → Codex + MCP 재할당 |
-| Phase 3 | CLI 실행 | `TFX_CLI_MODE=codex` 환경변수 주입하여 `tfx-route.sh` 호출 |
-| Phase 4 | 결과 파싱 | 동일 |
-| Phase 5 | 보고 | 동일 |
-
-The only deviation from `tfx-auto` occurs in **Phase 2** (forced gemini→codex substitution)
-and **Phase 3** (environment variable injection). All other phases are identical.
-
----
-
-## 8. Summary
-
-For the request `/tfx-codex API 문서를 작성하고 디자인 가이드도 만들어줘`:
-
-- Two subtasks are identified: **writer** (API docs) and **designer** (design guide).
-- Both roles were originally mapped to **Gemini CLI** in the default `tfx-auto` routing.
-- `tfx-codex` remaps them: `writer` → Codex Spark (`analyze` MCP), `designer` → Codex high-effort (`implement` MCP).
-- `TFX_CLI_MODE=codex` is injected at Phase 3 for every `tfx-route.sh` call.
-- The full `tfx-auto` 5-phase workflow is followed with the two overrides noted above.
-- Gemini CLI is never invoked; no Gemini dependency exists.

package/skills/tfx-workspace/iteration-1/codex-gemini-remap/with_skill/timing.json

@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "total_tokens": 14889,
-  "duration_ms": 69725,
-  "total_duration_seconds": 69.7
-}

package/skills/tfx-workspace/iteration-1/doctor-diagnosis/eval_metadata.json

@@ -1,11 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "eval_id": 4,
-  "eval_name": "doctor-diagnosis",
-  "prompt": "HUD가 안 보이고 codex도 안 되는데 어떻게 해?",
-  "assertions": [
-    "Runs 'triflux doctor' as first diagnostic step",
-    "Suggests '--fix' mode for auto-repair",
-    "Mentions HUD and CLI path checks in explanation",
-    "Does NOT jump straight to --reset (that's for cache only)"
-  ]
-}

package/skills/tfx-workspace/iteration-1/doctor-diagnosis/old_skill/grading.json

@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "expectations": [
-    {
-      "text": "Runs 'triflux doctor' as first diagnostic step",
-      "passed": true,
-      "evidence": "Agent output: 'Exact command: Bash(\"triflux doctor\")'"
-    },
-    {
-      "text": "Suggests '--fix' mode for auto-repair",
-      "passed": true,
-      "evidence": "Agent output: 'after the diagnostic report, offer /tfx-doctor --fix as the next step'"
-    },
-    {
-      "text": "Mentions HUD and CLI path checks in explanation",
-      "passed": true,
-      "evidence": "Agent output: 'HUD installation and config, Codex/Gemini/Claude CLI paths — directly relevant'"
-    },
-    {
-      "text": "Does NOT jump straight to --reset (that's for cache only)",
-      "passed": true,
-      "evidence": "Agent output: '--reset is destructive and reserved for explicit cache-clear request'"
-    }
-  ],
-  "summary": { "passed": 4, "failed": 0, "total": 4, "pass_rate": 1.0 }
-}

package/skills/tfx-workspace/iteration-1/doctor-diagnosis/old_skill/outputs/analysis.md

@@ -1,119 +0,0 @@
-# tfx-doctor Routing Analysis
-
-## User Request
-"HUD가 안 보이고 codex도 안 되는데 어떻게 해?"
-
----
-
-## 1. Mode Selection
-
-**Mode used: default (진단만)**
-
-Rationale:
-- The user is reporting two symptoms: HUD not visible and Codex not working.
-- The request does not contain any explicit repair intent ("--fix"), cache reset request ("캐시 초기화", "리셋", "reset"), or destructive intent.
-- The skill's auto-suggest trigger list includes both "HUD가 안 보여" and "codex/gemini가 안 돼", which directly match the user's message.
-- Because no `--fix` or `--reset` flag is implied, the skill begins in read-only diagnostic mode.
-- After the diagnostic report is shown, `--fix` would be **suggested** to the user as a next step.
-
----
-
-## 2. Exact Bash Command That Would Be Run
-
-```bash
-Bash("triflux doctor")
-```
-
-No additional flags. This is the read-only diagnostic path.
-
----
-
-## 3. Diagnostics Checked
-
-The `triflux doctor` command (default mode) checks all of the following:
-
-| Diagnostic Item | Relevance to This Request |
-|----------------|--------------------------|
-| tfx-route.sh 설치 상태 | General health baseline |
-| HUD 설치 및 설정 상태 | **Directly relevant** — user reports HUD not visible |
-| Codex/Gemini/Claude CLI 경로 (크로스 셸) | **Directly relevant** — user reports Codex not working |
-| 스킬 설치 상태 | General health |
-| 플러그인 등록 상태 | General health |
-| MCP 인벤토리 캐시 | Could affect HUD and CLI display |
-| CLI 이슈 트래커 | May log the Codex failure |
-| 잔존 팀(orphan teams) 감지 (`~/.claude/teams/`) | General health |
-
-All eight diagnostic areas are checked in default mode — none are skipped.
-
----
-
-## 4. Whether --fix Would Be Suggested
-
-**Yes.** After the diagnostic report is displayed, `--fix` would be recommended to the user as the next step if any issues are found (e.g., HUD misconfiguration, missing Codex CLI path, corrupted cache). The skill definition explicitly states:
-
-> 수정 모드 (`/tfx-doctor --fix`): 진단 전에 자동 수정을 시도합니다.
-
-The agent would prompt: "문제가 발견되었습니다. `/tfx-doctor --fix`를 실행하여 자동 수정을 시도하시겠습니까?"
-
----
-
-## 5. Whether --reset Would Be Used (and Why/Why Not)
-
-**No. `--reset` would NOT be used.**
-
-Reasons:
-- The user's message contains no reset/cache-clear intent ("캐시 초기화", "리셋", "reset").
-- `--reset` is a destructive operation that wipes all triflux-related caches (8 files including claude-usage-cache.json, mcp-inventory.json, etc.).
-- The symptoms described (HUD not visible, Codex not working) are diagnostic-first scenarios — they should be investigated before resorting to full cache deletion.
-- Per the skill definition, `--reset` is reserved for explicit cache-initialization requests.
-- If `--fix` still leaves issues unresolved, the agent would then consider suggesting `--reset` as a last resort, but only with user confirmation.
-
----
-
-## 6. Expected Report Format
-
-After `triflux doctor` runs, the agent reports results in this structure:
-
-```
-## triflux doctor 진단 결과
-
-| 항목 | 상태 | 비고 |
-|------|------|------|
-| tfx-route.sh | ✓ / ✗ | ... |
-| HUD | ✓ / ✗ | 설치됨/설치 안됨/설정 오류 |
-| Codex CLI 경로 | ✓ / ✗ | 경로 발견/미발견 |
-| Gemini CLI 경로 | ✓ / ✗ | ... |
-| Claude CLI 경로 | ✓ / ✗ | ... |
-| 스킬 설치 상태 | ✓ / ✗ | ... |
-| 플러그인 등록 | ✓ / ✗ | ... |
-| MCP 인벤토리 캐시 | ✓ / ✗ | ... |
-| CLI 이슈 트래커 | ✓ / ✗ | ... |
-| orphan teams | ✓ / ✗ | ... |
-
-이슈가 발견되었습니다. `/tfx-doctor --fix`로 자동 수정을 시도할 수 있습니다.
-```
-
-If no issues are found:
-```
-모든 진단 항목이 정상입니다.
-```
-
-If `--fix` is subsequently run and issues still remain after repair:
-```
-Codex/Gemini 설치는 수동으로 진행해야 합니다. (설치 안내 링크 또는 명령어 제공)
-```
-
----
-
-## Summary
-
-| Decision Point | Result |
-|----------------|--------|
-| Skill triggered | tfx-doctor |
-| Mode | default (read-only diagnostic) |
-| Command | `Bash("triflux doctor")` |
-| HUD diagnosed | Yes |
-| Codex CLI path diagnosed | Yes |
-| --fix suggested after report | Yes (if issues found) |
-| --reset used | No |
-| --reset trigger condition | Only if user explicitly requests cache reset |

package/skills/tfx-workspace/iteration-1/doctor-diagnosis/old_skill/timing.json

@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "total_tokens": 14482,
-  "duration_ms": 48260,
-  "total_duration_seconds": 48.3
-}

package/skills/tfx-workspace/iteration-1/doctor-diagnosis/with_skill/grading.json

@@ -1,25 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "expectations": [
-    {
-      "text": "Runs 'triflux doctor' as first diagnostic step",
-      "passed": true,
-      "evidence": "Agent output: 'Exact command: Bash(\"triflux doctor\")'"
-    },
-    {
-      "text": "Suggests '--fix' mode for auto-repair",
-      "passed": true,
-      "evidence": "Agent output: '--fix would be suggested to the user after the diagnosis report is returned'"
-    },
-    {
-      "text": "Mentions HUD and CLI path checks in explanation",
-      "passed": true,
-      "evidence": "Agent output: 'HUD installation and config, Codex/Gemini/Claude CLI paths — directly relevant to symptoms'"
-    },
-    {
-      "text": "Does NOT jump straight to --reset (that's for cache only)",
-      "passed": true,
-      "evidence": "Agent output: '--reset is destructive and reserved for explicit reset requests; user never said 리셋/초기화/reset'"
-    }
-  ],
-  "summary": { "passed": 4, "failed": 0, "total": 4, "pass_rate": 1.0 }
-}

package/skills/tfx-workspace/iteration-1/doctor-diagnosis/with_skill/outputs/analysis.md

@@ -1,115 +0,0 @@
-# tfx-doctor Routing Analysis
-
-## User Request
-
-> "HUD가 안 보이고 codex도 안 되는데 어떻게 해?"
-
----
-
-## Skill Matched
-
-**tfx-doctor** (`skills/tfx-doctor/SKILL.md`)
-
-The request directly matches two of the documented auto-suggestion triggers:
-- "HUD가 안 보여" → maps to "HUD가 안 보이고"
-- "codex/gemini가 안 돼" → maps to "codex도 안 되는데"
-
----
-
-## Mode Selected
-
-**Default mode** (`/tfx-doctor` — 진단만, 읽기 전용)
-
-Rationale: The user is reporting symptoms ("안 보이고", "안 되는데") but has not asked for an automatic fix, a reset, or a cache wipe. The skill definition states that the default mode is read-only diagnosis only. `--fix` would be *suggested* after the diagnosis if issues are found, but it would not be applied automatically without user consent. `--reset` is not appropriate here because the user has not said "캐시 초기화", "리셋", or "reset".
-
----
-
-## Exact Bash Command That Would Be Run
-
-```bash
-Bash("triflux doctor")
-```
-
-No flags. This is the single command executed in default mode.
-
----
-
-## Diagnostics Checked
-
-The skill definition lists the following items that `triflux doctor` inspects:
-
-| # | Diagnostic Item | Relevance to this Request |
-|---|-----------------|--------------------------|
-| 1 | tfx-route.sh 설치 상태 | Baseline routing check |
-| 2 | HUD 설치 및 설정 상태 | Directly relevant — HUD가 안 보임 |
-| 3 | Codex/Gemini/Claude CLI 경로 (크로스 셸) | Directly relevant — codex 안 됨 |
-| 4 | 스킬 설치 상태 | General health |
-| 5 | 플러그인 등록 상태 | General health |
-| 6 | MCP 인벤토리 캐시 | Could affect HUD/Codex behaviour |
-| 7 | CLI 이슈 트래커 | May surface logged errors |
-| 8 | 잔존 팀(orphan teams) 감지 (`~/.claude/teams/`) | General health |
-
-Both primary symptoms (HUD invisible, Codex not working) are covered by items 2 and 3.
-
----
-
-## --fix Suggestion
-
-**Yes — `--fix` would be suggested** after the diagnosis report is returned to the user.
-
-The skill's error-handling table states: "if issues remain after `--fix`, manual installation of Codex/Gemini is guided." This implies the flow is:
-
-1. Run default diagnosis → report findings.
-2. If issues are found, offer the user the option to re-run with `--fix`.
-3. User decides; skill does not auto-escalate.
-
----
-
-## --reset Decision
-
-**`--reset` would NOT be used.**
-
-Reasons:
-- The user did not request a cache wipe, full reset, or use the words "리셋", "초기화", or "reset".
-- `--reset` is a destructive, irreversible operation (deletes all cache files listed in the skill) and must only be triggered by explicit user intent.
-- The reported symptoms (HUD invisible, Codex not working) are diagnostic problems, not confirmed cache-corruption problems. A reset would be premature without diagnosis confirming a cache issue.
-
----
-
-## Expected Report Format
-
-After `triflux doctor` completes, the output is relayed to the user verbatim (per the skill: "결과를 사용자에게 보고합니다"). Based on the diagnostic items, the expected report structure is:
-
-```
-[triflux doctor] 진단 결과
-─────────────────────────────────
-✓ / ✗  tfx-route.sh 설치 상태
-✓ / ✗  HUD 설치 및 설정 상태
-✓ / ✗  Codex CLI 경로
-✓ / ✗  Gemini CLI 경로
-✓ / ✗  Claude CLI 경로
-✓ / ✗  스킬 설치 상태
-✓ / ✗  플러그인 등록 상태
-✓ / ✗  MCP 인벤토리 캐시
-✓ / ✗  CLI 이슈 트래커
-✓ / ✗  잔존 팀(orphan teams)
-─────────────────────────────────
-N개 이슈 발견. --fix로 자동 수정하려면: /tfx-doctor --fix
-```
-
-If `--fix` is subsequently accepted by the user, the report repeats after remediation, showing whether items moved from ✗ to ✓. Any items that `--fix` cannot resolve (e.g., Codex not installed) are surfaced with a manual-installation note.
-
----
-
-## Summary
-
-| Decision Point | Answer |
-|----------------|--------|
-| Skill triggered | tfx-doctor |
-| Mode | default (진단만) |
-| Command run | `triflux doctor` |
-| HUD checked | Yes |
-| CLI paths checked | Yes (Codex, Gemini, Claude) |
-| --fix suggested | Yes, after diagnosis |
-| --fix auto-applied | No |
-| --reset used | No |

package/skills/tfx-workspace/iteration-1/doctor-diagnosis/with_skill/timing.json

@@ -1,5 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "total_tokens": 14499,
-  "duration_ms": 53804,
-  "total_duration_seconds": 53.8
-}

package/skills/tfx-workspace/iteration-1/hub-start-sequence/eval_metadata.json

@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "eval_id": 5,
-  "eval_name": "hub-start-sequence",
-  "prompt": "/tfx-hub start",
-  "assertions": [
-    "Runs 'node hub/server.mjs' with run_in_background=true",
-    "Mentions port 27888 and /mcp endpoint",
-    "Does NOT try to run any triage or routing"
-  ]
-}

package/skills/tfx-workspace/iteration-1/hub-start-sequence/old_skill/grading.json

@@ -1,20 +0,0 @@
-{
-  "expectations": [
-    {
-      "text": "Runs 'node hub/server.mjs' with run_in_background=true",
-      "passed": true,
-      "evidence": "Agent output: 'Bash(\"node hub/server.mjs\", run_in_background=true)'"
-    },
-    {
-      "text": "Mentions port 27888 and /mcp endpoint",
-      "passed": true,
-      "evidence": "Agent output: 'Port: 27888, MCP endpoint: http://127.0.0.1:27888/mcp'"
-    },
-    {
-      "text": "Does NOT try to run any triage or routing",
-      "passed": true,
-      "evidence": "Agent correctly identified as command match, not fallthrough"
-    }
-  ],
-  "summary": { "passed": 3, "failed": 0, "total": 3, "pass_rate": 1.0 }
-}