tribunal-kit 4.2.0 → 4.3.1

package/.agent/skills/gsap-frameworks/SKILL.md

@@ -151,51 +151,57 @@ Do not create GSAP animations in the component’s setup or in a synchronous top
 ### Learn More
 
 - **gsap-react** skill for React-specific patterns (useGSAP, contextSafe).
-
----
-
-## 🏛️ Tribunal Integration (Anti-Hallucination)
-
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
-
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
-
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
-
----
-
-## 🚨 LLM Trap Table
-
-|Pattern|What AI Does Wrong|What Is Actually Correct|
-|:---|:---|:---|
-|gsap-frameworks|gsap.to() before onMounted/onMount|DOM must exist before GSAP grabs it. Wait for lifecycle hook|
-|gsap-frameworks|Global selection string (".item")|Use scoped context: gsap.context(() => {}, containerRef)|
-|gsap-frameworks|Forgetting to cleanup on unmount|ctx.revert() inside onUnmounted (Vue) or returned cleanup fn (Svelte)|
-
----
-
-## ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
-
-Before producing any output, verify:
-```
-✅ Did I read the actual files before making claims about them?
-✅ Did I verify all method names against official GSAP documentation?
-✅ Did I add // VERIFY: on any uncertain API calls?
-✅ Are all imports from packages that actually exist in package.json?
-✅ Did I test my logic with edge cases (null, empty, 0, max)?
-✅ Did I avoid generating code for more than one module at a time?
-✅ Am I working from evidence, not assumption?
-```
-
----
-
-## 🔁 VBC Protocol (Verify → Build → Confirm)
-
-```
-VERIFY:  Read the actual codebase before writing anything
-BUILD:   Generate the smallest meaningful unit of code
-CONFIRM: Verify the output is correct before presenting
-```
+
+---
+
+**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
+**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
+
+### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
+
+1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
+2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
+3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
+
+---
+
+## 🚨 LLM Trap Table
+
+|Pattern|What AI Does Wrong|What Is Actually Correct|
+|:---|:---|:---|
+|gsap-frameworks|gsap.to() before onMounted/onMount|DOM must exist before GSAP grabs it. Wait for lifecycle hook|
+|gsap-frameworks|Global selection string (".item")|Use scoped context: gsap.context(() => {}, containerRef)|
+|gsap-frameworks|Forgetting to cleanup on unmount|ctx.revert() inside onUnmounted (Vue) or returned cleanup fn (Svelte)|
+
+---
+
+## ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
+
+Before producing any output, verify:
+```
+✅ Did I read the actual files before making claims about them?
+✅ Did I verify all method names against official GSAP documentation?
+✅ Did I add // VERIFY: on any uncertain API calls?
+✅ Are all imports from packages that actually exist in package.json?
+✅ Did I test my logic with edge cases (null, empty, 0, max)?
+✅ Did I avoid generating code for more than one module at a time?
+✅ Am I working from evidence, not assumption?
+```
+
+---
+
+## 🔁 VBC Protocol (Verify → Build → Confirm)
+
+```
+VERIFY:  Read the actual codebase before writing anything
+BUILD:   Generate the smallest meaningful unit of code
+CONFIRM: Verify the output is correct before presenting
+```
+
+
+## Pre-Flight Checklist
+- [ ] Have I reviewed the user's specific constraints and requests?
+- [ ] Have I checked the environment for relevant existing implementations?
+
+## VBC Protocol (Verification-Before-Completion)
+You MUST verify existing code signatures and variables before attempting to modify or call them. No hallucination is permitted.

package/.agent/skills/gsap-performance/SKILL.md

@@ -77,51 +77,57 @@ document.querySelector("#container").addEventListener("mousemove", (e) => {
 - ❌ Set **will-change** or **force3D** on every element “just in case”; use for elements that are actually animating.
 - ❌ Create hundreds of overlapping tweens or ScrollTriggers without testing on low-end devices.
 - ❌ Ignore cleanup; stray tweens and ScrollTriggers keep running and can hurt performance and correctness.
-
----
-
-## 🏛️ Tribunal Integration (Anti-Hallucination)
-
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
-
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
-
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
-
----
-
-## 🚨 LLM Trap Table
-
-|Pattern|What AI Does Wrong|What Is Actually Correct|
-|:---|:---|:---|
-|gsap-performance|Layout caching issues|Call ScrollTrigger.refresh() on height/layout changes|
-|gsap-performance|Multiple separate tweens with delay|Use a single tween with stagger: 0.1|
-|gsap-performance|will-change on everything|Use sparingly, or let GSAP handle it via willChange: "transform" option|
-
----
-
-## ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
-
-Before producing any output, verify:
-```
-✅ Did I read the actual files before making claims about them?
-✅ Did I verify all method names against official GSAP documentation?
-✅ Did I add // VERIFY: on any uncertain API calls?
-✅ Are all imports from packages that actually exist in package.json?
-✅ Did I test my logic with edge cases (null, empty, 0, max)?
-✅ Did I avoid generating code for more than one module at a time?
-✅ Am I working from evidence, not assumption?
-```
-
----
-
-## 🔁 VBC Protocol (Verify → Build → Confirm)
-
-```
-VERIFY:  Read the actual codebase before writing anything
-BUILD:   Generate the smallest meaningful unit of code
-CONFIRM: Verify the output is correct before presenting
-```
+
+---
+
+**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
+**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
+
+### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
+
+1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
+2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
+3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
+
+---
+
+## 🚨 LLM Trap Table
+
+|Pattern|What AI Does Wrong|What Is Actually Correct|
+|:---|:---|:---|
+|gsap-performance|Layout caching issues|Call ScrollTrigger.refresh() on height/layout changes|
+|gsap-performance|Multiple separate tweens with delay|Use a single tween with stagger: 0.1|
+|gsap-performance|will-change on everything|Use sparingly, or let GSAP handle it via willChange: "transform" option|
+
+---
+
+## ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
+
+Before producing any output, verify:
+```
+✅ Did I read the actual files before making claims about them?
+✅ Did I verify all method names against official GSAP documentation?
+✅ Did I add // VERIFY: on any uncertain API calls?
+✅ Are all imports from packages that actually exist in package.json?
+✅ Did I test my logic with edge cases (null, empty, 0, max)?
+✅ Did I avoid generating code for more than one module at a time?
+✅ Am I working from evidence, not assumption?
+```
+
+---
+
+## 🔁 VBC Protocol (Verify → Build → Confirm)
+
+```
+VERIFY:  Read the actual codebase before writing anything
+BUILD:   Generate the smallest meaningful unit of code
+CONFIRM: Verify the output is correct before presenting
+```
+
+
+## Pre-Flight Checklist
+- [ ] Have I reviewed the user's specific constraints and requests?
+- [ ] Have I checked the environment for relevant existing implementations?
+
+## VBC Protocol (Verification-Before-Completion)
+You MUST verify existing code signatures and variables before attempting to modify or call them. No hallucination is permitted.

package/.agent/skills/gsap-plugins/SKILL.md

@@ -424,51 +424,57 @@ gsap.to(sprite, { pixi: { x: 200, y: 100, scale: 1.5 }, duration: 1 });
 ### Learn More
 
 https://gsap.com/docs/v3/Plugins/
-
----
-
-## 🏛️ Tribunal Integration (Anti-Hallucination)
-
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
-
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
-
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
-
----
-
-## 🚨 LLM Trap Table
-
-|Pattern|What AI Does Wrong|What Is Actually Correct|
-|:---|:---|:---|
-|gsap-plugins|Using premium plugins without club membership|MorphSVG, SplitText, ScrollSmoother require Club GSAP|
-|gsap-plugins|Forgetting gsap.registerPlugin(Plugin)|Register EVERY plugin before its first use|
-|gsap-plugins|SplitText hurting SEO|Always call .revert() after animating SplitText to restore DOM structure|
-
----
-
-## ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
-
-Before producing any output, verify:
-```
-✅ Did I read the actual files before making claims about them?
-✅ Did I verify all method names against official GSAP documentation?
-✅ Did I add // VERIFY: on any uncertain API calls?
-✅ Are all imports from packages that actually exist in package.json?
-✅ Did I test my logic with edge cases (null, empty, 0, max)?
-✅ Did I avoid generating code for more than one module at a time?
-✅ Am I working from evidence, not assumption?
-```
-
----
-
-## 🔁 VBC Protocol (Verify → Build → Confirm)
-
-```
-VERIFY:  Read the actual codebase before writing anything
-BUILD:   Generate the smallest meaningful unit of code
-CONFIRM: Verify the output is correct before presenting
-```
+
+---
+
+**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
+**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
+
+### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
+
+1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
+2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
+3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
+
+---
+
+## 🚨 LLM Trap Table
+
+|Pattern|What AI Does Wrong|What Is Actually Correct|
+|:---|:---|:---|
+|gsap-plugins|Using premium plugins without club membership|MorphSVG, SplitText, ScrollSmoother require Club GSAP|
+|gsap-plugins|Forgetting gsap.registerPlugin(Plugin)|Register EVERY plugin before its first use|
+|gsap-plugins|SplitText hurting SEO|Always call .revert() after animating SplitText to restore DOM structure|
+
+---
+
+## ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
+
+Before producing any output, verify:
+```
+✅ Did I read the actual files before making claims about them?
+✅ Did I verify all method names against official GSAP documentation?
+✅ Did I add // VERIFY: on any uncertain API calls?
+✅ Are all imports from packages that actually exist in package.json?
+✅ Did I test my logic with edge cases (null, empty, 0, max)?
+✅ Did I avoid generating code for more than one module at a time?
+✅ Am I working from evidence, not assumption?
+```
+
+---
+
+## 🔁 VBC Protocol (Verify → Build → Confirm)
+
+```
+VERIFY:  Read the actual codebase before writing anything
+BUILD:   Generate the smallest meaningful unit of code
+CONFIRM: Verify the output is correct before presenting
+```
+
+
+## Pre-Flight Checklist
+- [ ] Have I reviewed the user's specific constraints and requests?
+- [ ] Have I checked the environment for relevant existing implementations?
+
+## VBC Protocol (Verification-Before-Completion)
+You MUST verify existing code signatures and variables before attempting to modify or call them. No hallucination is permitted.

package/.agent/skills/gsap-react/SKILL.md

@@ -133,51 +133,57 @@ GSAP runs in the browser. Do not call gsap or ScrollTrigger during SSR.
 
 ### Learn More
 
-https://gsap.com/resources/React
----
-
-## 🏛️ Tribunal Integration (Anti-Hallucination)
-
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
-
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
-
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
-
----
-
-## 🚨 LLM Trap Table
-
-|Pattern|What AI Does Wrong|What Is Actually Correct|
-|:---|:---|:---|
-|gsap-react|useEffect or useLayoutEffect for GSAP|Use useGSAP() Hook from @gsap/react|
-|gsap-react|Forgetting dependencies in useGSAP|Explicitly set { dependencies: [reqs] } if you need reactivity|
-|gsap-react|gsap.context() inside useGSAP|Unnecessary, useGSAP creates a Context implicitly|
-
----
-
-## ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
-
-Before producing any output, verify:
-```
-✅ Did I read the actual files before making claims about them?
-✅ Did I verify all method names against official GSAP documentation?
-✅ Did I add // VERIFY: on any uncertain API calls?
-✅ Are all imports from packages that actually exist in package.json?
-✅ Did I test my logic with edge cases (null, empty, 0, max)?
-✅ Did I avoid generating code for more than one module at a time?
-✅ Am I working from evidence, not assumption?
-```
-
----
-
-## 🔁 VBC Protocol (Verify → Build → Confirm)
-
-```
-VERIFY:  Read the actual codebase before writing anything
-BUILD:   Generate the smallest meaningful unit of code
-CONFIRM: Verify the output is correct before presenting
-```
+https://gsap.com/resources/React
+---
+
+**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
+**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
+
+### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
+
+1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
+2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
+3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
+
+---
+
+## 🚨 LLM Trap Table
+
+|Pattern|What AI Does Wrong|What Is Actually Correct|
+|:---|:---|:---|
+|gsap-react|useEffect or useLayoutEffect for GSAP|Use useGSAP() Hook from @gsap/react|
+|gsap-react|Forgetting dependencies in useGSAP|Explicitly set { dependencies: [reqs] } if you need reactivity|
+|gsap-react|gsap.context() inside useGSAP|Unnecessary, useGSAP creates a Context implicitly|
+
+---
+
+## ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
+
+Before producing any output, verify:
+```
+✅ Did I read the actual files before making claims about them?
+✅ Did I verify all method names against official GSAP documentation?
+✅ Did I add // VERIFY: on any uncertain API calls?
+✅ Are all imports from packages that actually exist in package.json?
+✅ Did I test my logic with edge cases (null, empty, 0, max)?
+✅ Did I avoid generating code for more than one module at a time?
+✅ Am I working from evidence, not assumption?
+```
+
+---
+
+## 🔁 VBC Protocol (Verify → Build → Confirm)
+
+```
+VERIFY:  Read the actual codebase before writing anything
+BUILD:   Generate the smallest meaningful unit of code
+CONFIRM: Verify the output is correct before presenting
+```
+
+
+## Pre-Flight Checklist
+- [ ] Have I reviewed the user's specific constraints and requests?
+- [ ] Have I checked the environment for relevant existing implementations?
+
+## VBC Protocol (Verification-Before-Completion)
+You MUST verify existing code signatures and variables before attempting to modify or call them. No hallucination is permitted.

package/.agent/skills/gsap-scrolltrigger/SKILL.md

@@ -294,51 +294,57 @@ In React, use the `useGSAP()` hook (@gsap/react NPM package) to ensure proper cl
 
 https://gsap.com/docs/v3/Plugins/ScrollTrigger/
 
-
----
-
-## 🏛️ Tribunal Integration (Anti-Hallucination)
-
-**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
-**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
-
-### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
-
-1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
-2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
-3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
-
----
-
-## 🚨 LLM Trap Table
-
-|Pattern|What AI Does Wrong|What Is Actually Correct|
-|:---|:---|:---|
-|gsap-scrolltrigger|Forgot gsap.registerPlugin(ScrollTrigger)|MUST register before component mounts / animations run|
-|gsap-scrolltrigger|markers: true in production|Debug only — never ship. Use markers: false|
-|gsap-scrolltrigger|1 ScrollTrigger per list item|Use ScrollTrigger.batch() for lists to optimize performance|
-
----
-
-## ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
-
-Before producing any output, verify:
-```
-✅ Did I read the actual files before making claims about them?
-✅ Did I verify all method names against official GSAP documentation?
-✅ Did I add // VERIFY: on any uncertain API calls?
-✅ Are all imports from packages that actually exist in package.json?
-✅ Did I test my logic with edge cases (null, empty, 0, max)?
-✅ Did I avoid generating code for more than one module at a time?
-✅ Am I working from evidence, not assumption?
-```
-
----
-
-## 🔁 VBC Protocol (Verify → Build → Confirm)
-
-```
-VERIFY:  Read the actual codebase before writing anything
-BUILD:   Generate the smallest meaningful unit of code
-CONFIRM: Verify the output is correct before presenting
-```
+
+---
+
+**Slash command: `/review` or `/tribunal-full`**
+**Active reviewers: `logic-reviewer` · `security-auditor`**
+
+### ❌ Forbidden AI Tropes
+
+1. **Blind Assumptions:** Never make an assumption without documenting it clearly with `// VERIFY: [reason]`.
+2. **Silent Degradation:** Catching and suppressing errors without logging or handling.
+3. **Context Amnesia:** Forgetting the user's constraints and offering generic advice instead of tailored solutions.
+
+---
+
+## 🚨 LLM Trap Table
+
+|Pattern|What AI Does Wrong|What Is Actually Correct|
+|:---|:---|:---|
+|gsap-scrolltrigger|Forgot gsap.registerPlugin(ScrollTrigger)|MUST register before component mounts / animations run|
+|gsap-scrolltrigger|markers: true in production|Debug only — never ship. Use markers: false|
+|gsap-scrolltrigger|1 ScrollTrigger per list item|Use ScrollTrigger.batch() for lists to optimize performance|
+
+---
+
+## ✅ Pre-Flight Self-Audit
+
+Before producing any output, verify:
+```
+✅ Did I read the actual files before making claims about them?
+✅ Did I verify all method names against official GSAP documentation?
+✅ Did I add // VERIFY: on any uncertain API calls?
+✅ Are all imports from packages that actually exist in package.json?
+✅ Did I test my logic with edge cases (null, empty, 0, max)?
+✅ Did I avoid generating code for more than one module at a time?
+✅ Am I working from evidence, not assumption?
+```
+
+---
+
+## 🔁 VBC Protocol (Verify → Build → Confirm)
+
+```
+VERIFY:  Read the actual codebase before writing anything
+BUILD:   Generate the smallest meaningful unit of code
+CONFIRM: Verify the output is correct before presenting
+```
+
+
+## Pre-Flight Checklist
+- [ ] Have I reviewed the user's specific constraints and requests?
+- [ ] Have I checked the environment for relevant existing implementations?
+
+## VBC Protocol (Verification-Before-Completion)
+You MUST verify existing code signatures and variables before attempting to modify or call them. No hallucination is permitted.