toga-ai 1.0.427 → 1.0.428

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ project: _Underscore
6
6
  client: shared
7
7
  type: feature
8
8
  status: active
9
- updated: 2026-07-21
9
+ updated: 2026-07-23
10
10
  owners: ["jcardinal", "mhammontree", "tcox"]
11
11
  files:
12
12
  - api2/Component/Api/V2/V2.php
@@ -56,6 +56,13 @@ writable). Without it the field is rejected on write **and** is unreadable:
56
56
  - **`AclFieldPermissions` is `UNIQUE (recordFieldId, roleId)`** (Client blank DDL) — guard inserts
57
57
  with `NOT EXISTS`. For a **read-only, server-written** field (one populated by a `postPost`
58
58
  interceptor rather than the API caller), grant `isWritable = 0`.
59
+ - **A read-only field only needs a grant on the role(s) that actually READ it — find that role by
60
+ mirroring a sibling field of the same kind the readers already consume**, rather than blanket-granting
61
+ every role. E.g. the standard FK `serviceAddressId` mirrored its sibling FK `saleItemId`, whose sole
62
+ reader in `Client_Rate` is **role 1** (the toga2-view service cards) — so a single role-1 read grant
63
+ sufficed, NOT a 1/2/4 fan-out (a cross-role probe had shown roles 1/2/4 all lacked the grant, but only
64
+ role 1 actually reads the field). Grant `isWritable = 0` for a server-written field; resolve the role
65
+ by name/subselect (ids differ per client DB). Beta-proven on Rate `Client_Rate` 2026-07-23.
59
66
 
60
67
  ### Standard field vs. custom (`c_`) field — TWO different permission tables
61
68
 
@@ -199,6 +206,11 @@ the field.
199
206
 
200
207
  ## Change history
201
208
 
209
+ - **2026-07-23** — TRUE-79533: noted that a **read-only field only needs a grant on the role(s) that
210
+ actually read it** — mirror a sibling field of the same kind the readers already consume rather than
211
+ granting every role. The standard FK `serviceAddressId` mirrored `saleItemId`'s reader, **role 1** in
212
+ `Client_Rate` (the toga2-view service cards), so a single role-1 read grant sufficed (not a 1/2/4
213
+ fan-out). (tcox)
202
214
  - **2026-07-23** — TRUE-79533: documented the **READ side** of `AclFieldPermissions` — a registered
203
215
  field with no grant returns **`EZ-2`** on read (the counterpart of the write code `EV-9`), and
204
216
  the **standard vs. custom** split: standard fields use `AclFieldPermissions` (keyed by
@@ -60,5 +60,3 @@ easy to misread as an API problem.
60
60
  values to `String` before `urlEncode` — a numeric value (first hit via `fetchAddressesByIds`)
61
61
  threw `input.replace is not a function` and silently aborted the request client-side. Added
62
62
  regression tests. (tcox)
63
- </content>
64
- </invoke>
@@ -46,4 +46,3 @@ the store when it changed.
46
46
  field (a different covered property can have a different contact number). Previously the field
47
47
  was disabled once the store held a phone, and the post-purchase save made the first purchase lock
48
48
  it for every later visit. `save-if-different` retained. (tcox)
49
- </content>
@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@ project: _Underscore
6
6
  client: rate
7
7
  type: client-feature
8
8
  status: active
9
- updated: 2026-06-29
10
- owners: [mhammontree]
9
+ updated: 2026-07-23
10
+ owners: [mhammontree, tcox]
11
11
  files:
12
12
  - _underscore/Model/Rate/Entitlement.php
13
13
  - _underscore/ApiRequest.php
@@ -96,9 +96,21 @@ creation vs. cancellation. This is an accepted, documented limitation — not an
96
96
  address, so an entitlement with no address never even attempts contract creation (and
97
97
  never logs a `/contract` call).
98
98
  - **Auth-induced failures are blind to the monitor** — see the detection limitation above.
99
+ - **The AIG-success branch REASSIGNS `$payload->uuid`** (`$payload->uuid = _String::generateUuid()`,
100
+ repurposed as the AIG contract number) — and it does so **in the same `postPost`** that pins the WH
101
+ service address. On the pre-redesign build the pin step ran **after** this reassignment and keyed
102
+ off `$payload->uuid`, so **every successful AIG contract silently broke the WH address pin** (the
103
+ pin lookup matched no row). Preserve the ordering fix — snapshot the entitlement uuid **before**
104
+ this branch. See the
105
+ [WH per-address purchase guard](whole-home-warranty-purchase-guard.md) "AIG-success clobbers the
106
+ pin" gotcha (`_underscore` `_beta` `9c2e4b1c`).
99
107
 
100
108
  ## Change history
101
109
 
110
+ - 2026-07-23 — Documented that the **AIG-success branch reassigns `$payload->uuid`** (as the contract
111
+ number) inside the shared `postPost`, which silently broke the WH service-address pin on the
112
+ pre-redesign build (pin keyed off the now-reassigned uuid). Fixed by snapshotting the entitlement
113
+ uuid before the AIG branch (`_underscore` `_beta` `9c2e4b1c`). Cross-linked the WH guard doc. (tcox)
102
114
  - 2026-07-07 — `postPost` now also persists the validated service address
103
115
  (`Entitlements.c_serviceAddressId`, `Addresses.isValidated=1`), wrapped so it never blocks the
104
116
  AIG-contract/email flow; a new WH `prePost` guard carrier-normalizes the address onto the
@@ -106,6 +106,10 @@ Ticket: TRUE-79533. Business rule owner: PM Paulina.
106
106
  `Addresses.isValidated = 1` and writes `Entitlements.serviceAddressId`. This block is
107
107
  wrapped so a failure never interrupts the AIG-contract creation or the confirmation email
108
108
  (see the [AIG contract creation doc](aig-contract-creation.md) — the same `postPost`).
109
+ **The entitlement UUID is snapshotted up front** (`$entitlementUuid = $payload->uuid`) at the
110
+ top of `postPost`, **before** the AIG branch runs — because the AIG-success branch reassigns
111
+ `$payload->uuid` (see the "AIG-success clobbers the pin" gotcha). The pin lookup must use the
112
+ snapshot, not `$payload->uuid`.
109
113
  6. All SQL uses `_Database::escape()` / int-casts — `_Query` has **no bind API** in this path.
110
114
 
111
115
  ## Field & model: `serviceAddressId` is now a STANDARD field (reviewer Jeff)
@@ -280,6 +284,22 @@ live carrier waterfall is opt-in via `RUN_LIVE=1` (defaults off). Verified **18/
280
284
  - **`ApiPayloadInterceptors` (Client_Rate) has no `phpMethod` column.** The interceptor method
281
285
  is resolved **by convention** from `(prePostProcessing, httpMethod)`: `PRE+POST → prePost`,
282
286
  `POST+POST → postPost` (matches the framework `[pre|post][HttpMethod]` convention).
287
+ - **ROOT CAUSE of NULL pins on the pre-redesign build: the pin silently fails whenever the AIG
288
+ contract is created SUCCESSFULLY.** The old `postPost` pinned the entitlement by `$payload->uuid`,
289
+ but the **AIG-success branch reassigns `$payload->uuid = _String::generateUuid()`** (reusing it as
290
+ the AIG contract number) **before** the pin step. So on an AIG success the pin lookup by
291
+ `$payload->uuid` matches **no row**, logs `"TRUE-79533: could not resolve service address"`, and
292
+ gives up — leaving `Entitlements.serviceAddressId` (and, pre-redesign, `c_serviceAddressId`) NULL
293
+ and the purchase's `Addresses.isValidated` NULL (that pair is the fingerprint of a lost pin).
294
+ Pinning is therefore **intermittent — it works only when AIG auth FAILS** (the branch that
295
+ clobbers the uuid never runs). Proven on beta `Client_Rate` 2026-07-23: entitlement 68 pinned,
296
+ 69/70/71 unpinned despite an intact Contact→`primaryContactAddressId`→ContactAddresses chain.
297
+ **Fixed in `_underscore` `_beta` commit `9c2e4b1c`**: `postPost` snapshots
298
+ `$entitlementUuid = $payload->uuid` up front, before the AIG branch, and pins by the snapshot.
299
+ **DEPLOY DEPENDENCY:** any environment still running a **pre-redesign** `api2`/`_underscore` build
300
+ loses the address pin every time AIG succeeds; the fix only takes effect on **EB redeploy**
301
+ (api2 pulls `_underscore` at deploy). This is the mechanism behind the COALESCE fallback and the
302
+ dangling-pin gotcha below — the fallback is what keeps the dedup correct while pins are missing.
283
303
  - **Dedup is defeated by a DANGLING pin (not just a NULL one).** The COALESCE fallback covers a
284
304
  **NULL** `serviceAddressId`, but if `serviceAddressId` points at a **deleted `Addresses` row**,
285
305
  the join drops that entitlement and it becomes **invisible to the guard** — a duplicate WH slips
@@ -324,6 +344,17 @@ live carrier waterfall is opt-in via `RUN_LIVE=1` (defaults off). Verified **18/
324
344
  (verified in `api2/Component/Api/V2/V2.php` `getAclFieldPermissions()` ~line 5731), which is why
325
345
  a custom→standard promotion must re-create the read grant as an `AclFieldPermissions` row.
326
346
  (mhammontree)
347
+ - 2026-07-23 — **Root cause of intermittent NULL pins + guard hardening confirmed** (tcox). (1) The
348
+ `postPost` service-address pin **silently fails whenever the AIG contract creation SUCCEEDS**,
349
+ because the AIG-success branch reassigns `$payload->uuid` before the pin step, so pinning by
350
+ `$payload->uuid` matches no row (fingerprint: `serviceAddressId` + `Addresses.isValidated` both
351
+ NULL). Proven on beta (entitlement 68 pinned, 69/70/71 not). Fixed in `_underscore` `_beta`
352
+ `9c2e4b1c` (snapshot `$entitlementUuid` up front). Deploy-dependency: pins are lost on AIG success
353
+ on any pre-redesign build until EB redeploy. (2) The dedup blind spot (unpinned entitlements
354
+ invisible to `hasActiveWarrantyAtAddress` — demonstrated live: two active WH at "STE 250" slipped
355
+ through on the old build) is **CLOSED in `_beta` `a9f408bc`** — the dedup joins Addresses via
356
+ `COALESCE(serviceAddressId, ContactAddresses.addressId)`, disables the query cache for the read,
357
+ and documents an accepted TOCTOU. (tcox)
327
358
  - 2026-07-23 — **LAUNCH BLOCKER found: the standard `serviceAddressId` field has NO read ACL grant**
328
359
  (tcox). Probe-verified on beta: `GET /v2/entitlements?fields=serviceAddressId` → 403 `EZ-2` for
329
360
  roles 1/2/4 (`aclDatabase=CLIENT`). Standard fields are authorized via **`AclFieldPermissions`**
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ title: "Rate"
3
3
  framework: "2.0"
4
4
  apps:
5
5
  - _underscore
6
+ - api2
6
7
  - saml
7
8
  - toga2-view
8
9
  - worker
@@ -12,8 +13,8 @@ project: SAML SSO Gateway
12
13
  client: rate
13
14
  type: profile
14
15
  status: active
15
- updated: 2026-06-30
16
- owners: ["rgirish", "bala", "mhammontree"]
16
+ updated: 2026-07-23
17
+ owners: ["rgirish", "bala", "mhammontree", "tcox"]
17
18
  files: []
18
19
  related:
19
20
  - clients/rate/features/saml-sso.md
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "toga-ai",
3
- "version": "1.0.427",
3
+ "version": "1.0.428",
4
4
  "description": "TOGA Technology Team Claude Knowledge System — shared AI coding harness with skills, knowledge base CLI, and project installer for Claude Code.",
5
5
  "keywords": [
6
6
  "claude",