toenobu-agent 0.1.1 → 0.1.2

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/Makefile CHANGED
@@ -1,9 +1,21 @@
1
- .PHONY: login publish
1
+ .PHONY: login publish patch minor major
2
2
 
3
3
  # Login with your npm account
4
4
  login:
5
5
  npm login
6
6
 
7
+ # Bump patch version (0.1.0 -> 0.1.1)
8
+ patch:
9
+ npm version patch
10
+
11
+ # Bump minor version (0.1.0 -> 0.2.0)
12
+ minor:
13
+ npm version minor
14
+
15
+ # Bump major version (0.1.0 -> 1.0.0)
16
+ major:
17
+ npm version major
18
+
7
19
  # Publish toenobu-agent
8
20
  publish:
9
21
  npm publish
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "toenobu-agent",
3
- "version": "0.1.1",
3
+ "version": "0.1.2",
4
4
  "description": "toenobu's pi coding agent skills and extensions",
5
5
  "repository": {
6
6
  "type": "git",
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: executing-plans
3
+ description: Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints
4
+ ---
5
+
6
+ # Executing Plans
7
+
8
+ ## Overview
9
+
10
+ Load plan, review critically, execute tasks in batches, report for review between batches.
11
+
12
+ **Core principle:** Batch execution with checkpoints for architect review.
13
+
14
+ **Announce at start:** "I'm using the executing-plans skill to implement this plan."
15
+
16
+ ## The Process
17
+
18
+ ### Step 1: Load and Review Plan
19
+
20
+ 1. Read plan file
21
+ 2. Review critically - identify any questions or concerns about the plan
22
+ 3. If concerns: Raise them with your human partner before starting
23
+ 4. If no concerns: Create TodoWrite and proceed
24
+
25
+ ### Step 2: Execute Batch
26
+
27
+ **Default: First 3 tasks**
28
+
29
+ For each task:
30
+
31
+ 1. Mark as in_progress
32
+ 2. Follow each step exactly (plan has bite-sized steps)
33
+ 3. Run verifications as specified
34
+ 4. Mark as completed
35
+
36
+ ### Step 3: Report
37
+
38
+ When batch complete:
39
+
40
+ - Show what was implemented
41
+ - Show verification output
42
+ - Say: "Ready for feedback."
43
+
44
+ ### Step 4: Continue
45
+
46
+ Based on feedback:
47
+
48
+ - Apply changes if needed
49
+ - Execute next batch
50
+ - Repeat until complete
51
+
52
+ ### Step 5: Complete Development
53
+
54
+ After all tasks complete and verified:
55
+
56
+ - Announce: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."
57
+ - **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch
58
+ - Follow that skill to verify tests, present options, execute choice
59
+
60
+ ## When to Stop and Ask for Help
61
+
62
+ **STOP executing immediately when:**
63
+
64
+ - Hit a blocker mid-batch (missing dependency, test fails, instruction unclear)
65
+ - Plan has critical gaps preventing starting
66
+ - You don't understand an instruction
67
+ - Verification fails repeatedly
68
+
69
+ **Ask for clarification rather than guessing.**
70
+
71
+ ## When to Revisit Earlier Steps
72
+
73
+ **Return to Review (Step 1) when:**
74
+
75
+ - Partner updates the plan based on your feedback
76
+ - Fundamental approach needs rethinking
77
+
78
+ **Don't force through blockers** - stop and ask.
79
+
80
+ ## Remember
81
+
82
+ - Review plan critically first
83
+ - Follow plan steps exactly
84
+ - Don't skip verifications
85
+ - Reference skills when plan says to
86
+ - Between batches: just report and wait
87
+ - Stop when blocked, don't guess
88
+ - Never start implementation on main/master branch without explicit user consent
89
+
90
+ ## Integration
91
+
92
+ **Required workflow skills:**
93
+
94
+ - **superpowers:using-git-worktrees** - REQUIRED: Set up isolated workspace before starting
95
+ - **superpowers:writing-plans** - Creates the plan this skill executes
96
+ - **superpowers:finishing-a-development-branch** - Complete development after all tasks
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: writing-plans
3
+ description: Use when you have a spec or requirements for a multi-step task, before touching code
4
+ ---
5
+
6
+ # Writing Plans
7
+
8
+ ## Overview
9
+
10
+ Write comprehensive implementation plans assuming the engineer has zero context for our codebase and questionable taste. Document everything they need to know: which files to touch for each task, code, testing, docs they might need to check, how to test it. Give them the whole plan as bite-sized tasks.
11
+
12
+ DRY. YAGNI. TDD. Frequent commits.
13
+
14
+ Assume they are a skilled developer, but know almost nothing about our toolset or problem domain. Assume they don't know good test design very well.
15
+
16
+ **Announce at start:** "I'm using the writing-plans skill to create the implementation plan."
17
+
18
+ **Context:** This should be run in a dedicated worktree (created by brainstorming skill).
19
+
20
+ **Save plans to:** `docs/plans/YYYY-MM-DD-<feature-name>.md`
21
+
22
+ ## Bite-Sized Task Granularity
23
+
24
+ **Each step is one action (2-5 minutes):**
25
+
26
+ - "Write the failing test" - step
27
+ - "Run it to make sure it fails" - step
28
+ - "Implement the minimal code to make the test pass" - step
29
+ - "Run the tests and make sure they pass" - step
30
+ - "Commit" - step
31
+
32
+ ## Plan Document Header
33
+
34
+ **Every plan MUST start with this header:**
35
+
36
+ ```markdown
37
+ # [Feature Name] Implementation Plan
38
+
39
+ > **For Claude:** REQUIRED SUB-SKILL: Use superpowers:executing-plans to implement this plan task-by-task.
40
+
41
+ **Goal:** [One sentence describing what this builds]
42
+
43
+ **Architecture:** [2-3 sentences about approach]
44
+
45
+ **Tech Stack:** [Key technologies/libraries]
46
+
47
+ ---
48
+ ```
49
+
50
+ ## Task Structure
51
+
52
+ ```markdown
53
+ ### Task N: [Component Name]
54
+
55
+ **Files:**
56
+ - Create: `exact/path/to/file.py`
57
+ - Modify: `exact/path/to/existing.py:123-145`
58
+ - Test: `tests/exact/path/to/test.py`
59
+
60
+ **Step 1: Write the failing test**
61
+
62
+ ```python
63
+ def test_specific_behavior():
64
+ result = function(input)
65
+ assert result == expected
66
+ ```
67
+
68
+ **Step 2: Run test to verify it fails**
69
+
70
+ Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v`
71
+ Expected: FAIL with "function not defined"
72
+
73
+ **Step 3: Write minimal implementation**
74
+
75
+ ```python
76
+ def function(input):
77
+ return expected
78
+ ```
79
+
80
+ **Step 4: Run test to verify it passes**
81
+
82
+ Run: `pytest tests/path/test.py::test_name -v`
83
+ Expected: PASS
84
+
85
+ **Step 5: Commit**
86
+
87
+ ```bash
88
+ git add tests/path/test.py src/path/file.py
89
+ git commit -m "feat: add specific feature"
90
+ ```
91
+ ```
92
+
93
+ ## Remember
94
+
95
+ - Exact file paths always
96
+ - Complete code in plan (not "add validation")
97
+ - Exact commands with expected output
98
+ - Reference relevant skills with @ syntax
99
+ - DRY, YAGNI, TDD, frequent commits
100
+
101
+ ## Execution Handoff
102
+
103
+ After saving the plan, offer execution choice:
104
+
105
+ **"Plan complete and saved to `docs/plans/<filename>.md`. Two execution options:**
106
+
107
+ **1. Subagent-Driven (this session)**
108
+ - I dispatch fresh subagent per task, review between tasks, fast iteration
109
+
110
+ **2. Parallel Session (separate)**
111
+ - Open new session with executing-plans, batch execution with checkpoints
112
+
113
+ **Which approach?"**
114
+
115
+ **If Subagent-Driven chosen:**
116
+ - **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** Use superpowers:subagent-driven-development
117
+ - Stay in this session
118
+ - Fresh subagent per task + code review
119
+
120
+ **If Parallel Session chosen:**
121
+ - Guide them to open new session in worktree
122
+ - **REQUIRED SUB-SKILL:** New session uses superpowers:executing-plans