testing-area 0.0.0-stage → 1.0.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
1
+ <!-- BEGIN GRIMOIRE-SKILLS MANAGED BLOCK -->
2
+
3
+ ## Grimoire Skills
4
+
5
+ Installed skills are located in .agents/skills/. Read each skill's SKILL.md before using it. Combination spells require their listed prerequisites.
6
+
7
+ <!-- END GRIMOIRE-SKILLS MANAGED BLOCK -->
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ id: analyze-layout-geometry
3
+ name: Analyze Layout Geometry
4
+ rank: C
5
+ version: 1.0.0
6
+ status: active
7
+ author: Dion
8
+ maintainers:
9
+ - Dion
10
+ contributors: []
11
+ created: 2026-10-17
12
+ updated: 2026-10-17
13
+ effort: low
14
+ estimated_tokens: 1000-2000
15
+ class: Validation / Audit
16
+ target: UI layout, screenshot, or component specification
17
+ tags: [ui, layout, geometry, spacing]
18
+ ---
19
+
20
+ # Analyze Layout Geometry
21
+
22
+ ## Attributes & Metadata
23
+
24
+ - **Rank:** C
25
+ - **Strategy:** Inspect, measure, report
26
+ - **Target:** UI layout, screenshot, or component specification
27
+
28
+ ## Preconditions
29
+
30
+ - EXPECT a layout, screenshot, or component specification.
31
+ - ASSERT viewport dimensions and relevant design tokens when available.
32
+ - REJECT inputs without enough visual or structural information to assess geometry.
33
+
34
+ ## Execution Pipeline
35
+
36
+ 1. Identify containers, alignment axes, and layout boundaries.
37
+ 2. Measure spacing, sizing, proportions, and gaps.
38
+ 3. Compare values against stated or inferred design tokens.
39
+ 4. Report inconsistencies and corrective changes.
40
+
41
+ ## Core Effect
42
+
43
+ Produce a concise geometry assessment with actionable layout corrections.
44
+
45
+ ## Constraints & Limits
46
+
47
+ - MUST distinguish measured values from estimates.
48
+ - MUST preserve intentional hierarchy and alignment.
49
+ - MUST NOT recommend arbitrary spacing without a stated basis.
50
+ - SHOULD identify the smallest structural change that resolves each issue.
51
+
52
+ ## Example Invocation
53
+
54
+ **Input:** Apply this skill to a representative engineering request within its stated target.
55
+
56
+ **Output:** The defined artifact, verification results, and known limitations.
57
+
58
+ ## Post-Execution Verification
59
+
60
+ - ENSURE every reported issue identifies its affected element.
61
+ - VERIFY recommendations address alignment, sizing, or spacing directly.
62
+ - EMIT findings grouped by severity and location.
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ id: audit-existing-ui-component
3
+ name: Audit Existing UI Component
4
+ rank: A
5
+ version: 1.0.0
6
+ status: active
7
+ author: Dion
8
+ maintainers:
9
+ - Dion
10
+ contributors: []
11
+ created: 2026-10-17
12
+ updated: 2026-10-17
13
+ effort: high
14
+ estimated_tokens: 4000-8000
15
+ class: Orchestration · Validation / Audit
16
+ target: Existing UI component or implementation
17
+ tags: [ui, audit, accessibility, responsive, consistency]
18
+ composes:
19
+ - analyze-layout-geometry
20
+ - validate-accessibility
21
+ - optimize-responsive-layout
22
+ - review-visual-consistency
23
+ ---
24
+
25
+ # Audit Existing UI Component
26
+
27
+ ## Prerequisites
28
+
29
+ - `analyze-layout-geometry` is available.
30
+ - `validate-accessibility` is available.
31
+ - `optimize-responsive-layout` is available.
32
+ - `review-visual-consistency` is available.
33
+ - The component implementation or rendered output is available.
34
+ - Supported viewports and project design references are known.
35
+
36
+ ## Execution Pipeline
37
+
38
+ 1. Analyze layout geometry and structural alignment.
39
+ 2. Review visual consistency against project references.
40
+ 3. Audit accessibility semantics and interaction behavior.
41
+ 4. Check responsive behavior across supported viewports.
42
+ 5. Consolidate findings by severity, effort, and dependency.
43
+
44
+ ## Core Effect
45
+
46
+ Produce a prioritized engineering audit of an existing UI component.
47
+
48
+ ## Constraints & Limits
49
+
50
+ - MUST preserve evidence from every composed skill.
51
+ - MUST separate observed defects from recommendations.
52
+ - MUST NOT claim compliance without sufficient inspection.
53
+ - SHOULD identify dependencies between corrective actions.
54
+
55
+ ## Example Invocation
56
+
57
+ **Input:** Apply this skill to a representative engineering request within its stated target.
58
+
59
+ **Output:** The defined artifact, verification results, and known limitations.
60
+
61
+ ## Post-Execution Verification
62
+
63
+ - ENSURE every finding has evidence, impact, and a recommended action.
64
+ - VERIFY duplicate findings are merged.
65
+ - EMIT a prioritized audit report and remaining limitations.
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ id: optimize-responsive-layout
3
+ name: Optimize Responsive Layout
4
+ rank: B
5
+ version: 1.0.0
6
+ status: active
7
+ author: Dion
8
+ maintainers:
9
+ - Dion
10
+ contributors: []
11
+ created: 2026-10-17
12
+ updated: 2026-10-17
13
+ effort: medium
14
+ estimated_tokens: 2000-4000
15
+ class: Transformation
16
+ target: Responsive UI implementation or layout specification
17
+ tags: [ui, responsive, layout, mobile]
18
+ ---
19
+
20
+ # Optimize Responsive Layout
21
+
22
+ ## Attributes & Metadata
23
+
24
+ - **Rank:** B
25
+ - **Strategy:** Inspect, model, adjust, verify
26
+ - **Target:** Responsive UI implementation or layout specification
27
+
28
+ ## Preconditions
29
+
30
+ - EXPECT supported viewport ranges and primary content priorities.
31
+ - ASSERT the existing layout system, breakpoints, and design tokens when available.
32
+ - REJECT changes that optimize one viewport by breaking required content or behavior elsewhere.
33
+
34
+ ## Execution Pipeline
35
+
36
+ 1. Identify overflow, wrapping, collision, and hierarchy failures.
37
+ 2. Define content-driven layout rules and breakpoint behavior.
38
+ 3. Adjust containers, grids, flex rules, typography, and media sizing.
39
+ 4. Verify key states across supported viewport ranges.
40
+
41
+ ## Core Effect
42
+
43
+ Produce a responsive layout that preserves content hierarchy and interaction quality across viewport sizes.
44
+
45
+ ## Constraints & Limits
46
+
47
+ - MUST prioritize content and interaction requirements over fixed dimensions.
48
+ - MUST preserve readable text and usable controls at supported sizes.
49
+ - MUST NOT add breakpoints without a layout failure or content requirement.
50
+ - SHOULD use fluid sizing before breakpoint-specific overrides.
51
+
52
+ ## Example Invocation
53
+
54
+ **Input:** Apply this skill to a representative engineering request within its stated target.
55
+
56
+ **Output:** The defined artifact, verification results, and known limitations.
57
+
58
+ ## Post-Execution Verification
59
+
60
+ - ENSURE no required content overflows or becomes inaccessible.
61
+ - VERIFY layout behavior at minimum, maximum, and intermediate widths.
62
+ - VERIFY touch targets, focus order, and text wrapping.
63
+ - EMIT changed rules, tested viewports, and remaining limitations.
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ id: review-visual-consistency
3
+ name: Review Visual Consistency
4
+ rank: C
5
+ version: 1.0.0
6
+ status: active
7
+ author: Dion
8
+ maintainers:
9
+ - Dion
10
+ contributors: []
11
+ created: 2026-10-17
12
+ updated: 2026-10-17
13
+ effort: low
14
+ estimated_tokens: 1000-2000
15
+ class: Validation / Audit
16
+ target: UI component, page, screenshot, or design reference
17
+ tags: [ui, visual, consistency, review]
18
+ ---
19
+
20
+ # Review Visual Consistency
21
+
22
+ ## Prerequisites
23
+
24
+ - EXPECT a UI artifact and a project reference, token set, or established component pattern.
25
+ - ASSERT the target viewport and relevant state when reviewing a rendered result.
26
+
27
+ ## Execution Pipeline
28
+
29
+ 1. Compare typography, color, spacing, borders, radii, elevation, and iconography.
30
+ 2. Identify deviations from project patterns.
31
+ 3. Classify deviations by visibility and user impact.
32
+ 4. Recommend the smallest corrective changes.
33
+
34
+ ## Core Effect
35
+
36
+ Produce a focused visual consistency review with actionable corrections.
37
+
38
+ ## Constraints & Limits
39
+
40
+ - MUST distinguish visual defects from intentional variation.
41
+ - MUST use project references as the comparison basis.
42
+ - MUST NOT recommend changes without identifying the affected element.
43
+ - SHOULD prioritize repeated or high-visibility inconsistencies.
44
+
45
+ ## Example Invocation
46
+
47
+ **Input:** Apply this skill to a representative engineering request within its stated target.
48
+
49
+ **Output:** The defined artifact, verification results, and known limitations.
50
+
51
+ ## Post-Execution Verification
52
+
53
+ - ENSURE every finding includes location, evidence, and correction.
54
+ - VERIFY recommendations preserve hierarchy and usability.
55
+ - EMIT findings grouped by priority.
@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ id: validate-accessibility
3
+ name: Validate Accessibility
4
+ rank: B
5
+ version: 1.0.0
6
+ status: active
7
+ author: Dion
8
+ maintainers:
9
+ - Dion
10
+ contributors: []
11
+ created: 2026-10-17
12
+ updated: 2026-10-17
13
+ effort: medium
14
+ estimated_tokens: 2000-4000
15
+ class: Validation / Audit
16
+ target: UI component, page, or interaction flow
17
+ tags: [ui, accessibility, semantics, keyboard]
18
+ ---
19
+
20
+ # Validate Accessibility
21
+
22
+ ## Attributes & Metadata
23
+
24
+ - **Rank:** B
25
+ - **Strategy:** Inspect, test, classify, remediate
26
+ - **Target:** UI component, page, or interaction flow
27
+
28
+ ## Preconditions
29
+
30
+ - EXPECT component markup, implementation, or an accessible interaction description.
31
+ - ASSERT known user actions and supported states.
32
+ - REJECT claims of compliance without inspectable structure or behavior.
33
+
34
+ ## Execution Pipeline
35
+
36
+ 1. Inspect semantic structure, names, roles, and states.
37
+ 2. Check keyboard navigation, focus order, and focus visibility.
38
+ 3. Check labels, contrast, errors, status messages, and responsive zoom behavior.
39
+ 4. Classify violations by impact and provide targeted fixes.
40
+
41
+ ## Core Effect
42
+
43
+ Produce an accessibility assessment with concrete remediation steps.
44
+
45
+ ## Constraints & Limits
46
+
47
+ - MUST prefer native HTML semantics over unnecessary ARIA.
48
+ - MUST ensure every interactive control has an accessible name.
49
+ - MUST support keyboard operation for all essential actions.
50
+ - MUST NOT claim full compliance from static inspection alone.
51
+ - SHOULD identify the applicable WCAG criterion when known.
52
+
53
+ ## Example Invocation
54
+
55
+ **Input:** Apply this skill to a representative engineering request within its stated target.
56
+
57
+ **Output:** The defined artifact, verification results, and known limitations.
58
+
59
+ ## Post-Execution Verification
60
+
61
+ - ENSURE each finding includes impact, location, and remediation.
62
+ - VERIFY all essential actions have a keyboard path.
63
+ - EMIT findings grouped by severity and verification method.
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,15 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "testing-area",
3
- "version": "0.0.0-stage",
4
- "stub": true,
5
- "description": "Temporary package placeholder for staged publishing"
6
- }
3
+ "version": "1.0.0",
4
+ "description": "",
5
+ "main": "index.js",
6
+ "scripts": {
7
+ "test": "echo \"Error: no test specified\" && exit 1"
8
+ },
9
+ "keywords": [],
10
+ "author": "",
11
+ "license": "ISC",
12
+ "dependencies": {
13
+ "engineering-grimoires": "file:.."
14
+ }
15
+ }
package/README.md DELETED
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
1
- # Temporary Holding Version
2
-
3
- This version is a temporary placeholder for this package. An operational version to replace this has been submitted for review and is awaiting a staged release.