teamspec 3.2.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (45) hide show
  1. package/LICENSE +21 -0
  2. package/README.md +252 -0
  3. package/bin/teamspec-init.js +10 -0
  4. package/extensions/teamspec-0.1.0.vsix +0 -0
  5. package/lib/cli.js +1174 -0
  6. package/lib/extension-installer.js +236 -0
  7. package/lib/linter.js +1184 -0
  8. package/lib/prompt-generator.js +409 -0
  9. package/package.json +51 -0
  10. package/teamspec-core/agents/AGENT_BA.md +486 -0
  11. package/teamspec-core/agents/AGENT_BOOTSTRAP.md +447 -0
  12. package/teamspec-core/agents/AGENT_DES.md +623 -0
  13. package/teamspec-core/agents/AGENT_DEV.md +611 -0
  14. package/teamspec-core/agents/AGENT_FA.md +736 -0
  15. package/teamspec-core/agents/AGENT_FEEDBACK.md +202 -0
  16. package/teamspec-core/agents/AGENT_FIX.md +380 -0
  17. package/teamspec-core/agents/AGENT_QA.md +756 -0
  18. package/teamspec-core/agents/AGENT_SA.md +581 -0
  19. package/teamspec-core/agents/AGENT_SM.md +771 -0
  20. package/teamspec-core/agents/README.md +383 -0
  21. package/teamspec-core/context/_schema.yml +222 -0
  22. package/teamspec-core/copilot-instructions.md +356 -0
  23. package/teamspec-core/definitions/definition-of-done.md +129 -0
  24. package/teamspec-core/definitions/definition-of-ready.md +104 -0
  25. package/teamspec-core/profiles/enterprise.yml +127 -0
  26. package/teamspec-core/profiles/platform-team.yml +104 -0
  27. package/teamspec-core/profiles/regulated.yml +97 -0
  28. package/teamspec-core/profiles/startup.yml +85 -0
  29. package/teamspec-core/teamspec.yml +69 -0
  30. package/teamspec-core/templates/README.md +211 -0
  31. package/teamspec-core/templates/active-sprint-template.md +98 -0
  32. package/teamspec-core/templates/adr-template.md +194 -0
  33. package/teamspec-core/templates/bug-report-template.md +188 -0
  34. package/teamspec-core/templates/business-analysis-template.md +164 -0
  35. package/teamspec-core/templates/decision-log-template.md +216 -0
  36. package/teamspec-core/templates/feature-template.md +269 -0
  37. package/teamspec-core/templates/functional-spec-template.md +161 -0
  38. package/teamspec-core/templates/refinement-notes-template.md +133 -0
  39. package/teamspec-core/templates/sprint-goal-template.md +129 -0
  40. package/teamspec-core/templates/sprint-template.md +175 -0
  41. package/teamspec-core/templates/sprints-index-template.md +67 -0
  42. package/teamspec-core/templates/story-template.md +244 -0
  43. package/teamspec-core/templates/storymap-template.md +204 -0
  44. package/teamspec-core/templates/testcases-template.md +147 -0
  45. package/teamspec-core/templates/uat-pack-template.md +161 -0
@@ -0,0 +1,194 @@
1
+ # ADR-XXX: [Decision Title]
2
+
3
+ <!--
4
+ ⚠️ ADR RULES
5
+
6
+ Architecture Decision Records document technical decisions.
7
+
8
+ RULES:
9
+ 1. ADRs link to features they affect
10
+ 2. ADRs link to business decisions that triggered them
11
+ 3. SA does NOT update Feature Canon directly - ADRs inform FA
12
+ 4. If behavior is affected, FA must review Feature Canon
13
+
14
+ TEAMSPEC RULES ENFORCED:
15
+ - TS-ADR-001: ADR required for architecture-impacting changes
16
+ - TS-ADR-002: ADR must link to affected features
17
+ -->
18
+
19
+ > **Template Version**: 2.0
20
+ > **Last Updated**: 2026-01-07
21
+
22
+ ---
23
+
24
+ **Document Owner:** SA (Solution Architect)
25
+ **Artifact Type:** Technical Decision (Canonical)
26
+ **Lifecycle:** Permanent, versioned
27
+
28
+ ---
29
+
30
+ ## Metadata
31
+
32
+ | Field | Value |
33
+ | :--- | :--- |
34
+ | **ADR ID** | ADR-XXX |
35
+ | **Status** | Proposed / Accepted / Deprecated / Superseded |
36
+ | **Date** | YYYY-MM-DD |
37
+ | **Author** | [SA Name] |
38
+ | **Superseded By** | [ADR-YYY if applicable] |
39
+
40
+ ---
41
+
42
+ ## Context
43
+
44
+ > What is the problem? Why do we need to make a decision?
45
+
46
+ [Describe the technical situation, constraints, and forces that require a decision.]
47
+
48
+ ---
49
+
50
+ ## Options Considered
51
+
52
+ ### Option 1: [Option Name]
53
+
54
+ **Description**: [Brief description]
55
+
56
+ **Pros**:
57
+ - [Pro 1]
58
+ - [Pro 2]
59
+
60
+ **Cons**:
61
+ - [Con 1]
62
+ - [Con 2]
63
+
64
+ ### Option 2: [Option Name]
65
+
66
+ **Description**: [Brief description]
67
+
68
+ **Pros**:
69
+ - [Pro 1]
70
+
71
+ **Cons**:
72
+ - [Con 1]
73
+
74
+ ---
75
+
76
+ ## Decision
77
+
78
+ > We are choosing **Option X** because...
79
+
80
+ [Clear statement of the decision and primary rationale]
81
+
82
+ ---
83
+
84
+ ## Consequences
85
+
86
+ ### Positive
87
+
88
+ - [Benefit 1]
89
+ - [Benefit 2]
90
+
91
+ ### Negative
92
+
93
+ - [Trade-off 1]
94
+ - [Trade-off 2]
95
+
96
+ ---
97
+
98
+ ## Related Decisions
99
+
100
+ <!-- TEAMSPEC RULE: Link to business decisions that triggered this ADR -->
101
+
102
+ | Decision ID | Decision Title | Relationship |
103
+ |-------------|----------------|--------------|
104
+ | [DEC-XXX](../decisions/DEC-XXX-*.md) | [Title] | Triggered by / Related to |
105
+
106
+ > If this ADR was triggered by a business decision, link it here.
107
+
108
+ ---
109
+
110
+ ## Affected Features
111
+
112
+ <!-- TEAMSPEC RULE: TS-ADR-002 - ADR must link to features -->
113
+
114
+ > ⚠️ If this decision affects user-observable behavior, FA must review Feature Canon.
115
+
116
+ | Feature ID | Feature Name | Impact | Canon Review Needed? |
117
+ |------------|--------------|--------|---------------------|
118
+ | [F-XXX](../features/F-XXX-name.md) | [Name] | [How this affects behavior] | Yes / No |
119
+
120
+ ---
121
+
122
+ ## Behavior Impact Assessment
123
+
124
+ > ⚠️ SA provides technical facts. FA translates to Feature Canon behavior.
125
+
126
+ ### Does this ADR affect user-observable behavior?
127
+
128
+ - [ ] **No** — Internal/technical change only (no Canon update needed)
129
+ - [ ] **Yes** — Behavior implications described below
130
+
131
+ ### Behavior Implications (if Yes)
132
+
133
+ | Technical Decision | Behavior Implication | FA Action |
134
+ |--------------------|---------------------|-----------|
135
+ | [e.g., Rate limit: 100 req/min] | [e.g., System rejects excess requests] | FA adds to Canon |
136
+
137
+ > **Workflow:**
138
+ > 1. SA creates ADR with technical constraints
139
+ > 2. ADR may imply behavior constraints
140
+ > 3. FA incorporates constraints into Feature Canon
141
+ > 4. FA owns the behavioral wording
142
+
143
+ ---
144
+
145
+ ## Examples of Behavior-Impacting Decisions
146
+
147
+ ✅ **Include in Feature Impact** (FA must review Canon):
148
+ - Changing how errors are reported to users
149
+ - Adding/removing functionality constraints
150
+ - Changing performance characteristics users observe
151
+ - Changing access control or permissions
152
+
153
+ ❌ **Usually no Feature Impact**:
154
+ - Internal refactoring (no user-observable change)
155
+ - Technology stack decisions (if behavior unchanged)
156
+ - Database optimization (if behavior unchanged)
157
+
158
+ ---
159
+
160
+ ## Documentation Trail
161
+
162
+ This ADR is referenced in Feature Canon Change Log when it affects documented behavior:
163
+
164
+ > ADR-XXX: [Title] — Added [feature capability / constraint]
165
+
166
+ This maintains traceability between architecture and product behavior.
167
+
168
+ ---
169
+
170
+ ## Implementation Notes
171
+
172
+ _Technical details for DEV team._
173
+
174
+ - [Implementation note 1]
175
+ - [Implementation note 2]
176
+
177
+ ---
178
+
179
+ ## Review & Approval
180
+
181
+ | Role | Name | Status | Date |
182
+ |------|------|--------|------|
183
+ | SA (Author) | [Name] | ✅ | YYYY-MM-DD |
184
+ | Tech Lead | [Name] | ⏳ | |
185
+ | FA (if behavior affected) | [Name] | ⏳ | |
186
+
187
+ ---
188
+
189
+ ## Linter Rules Enforced
190
+
191
+ | Rule | Description |
192
+ |------|-------------|
193
+ | TS-ADR-001 | ADR required for architecture-impacting changes |
194
+ | TS-ADR-002 | ADR must link to affected features |
@@ -0,0 +1,188 @@
1
+ # Bug: [Title]
2
+
3
+ <!--
4
+ ⚠️ BUG CLASSIFICATION IS MANDATORY
5
+
6
+ When reporting bugs, you MUST classify whether the issue is:
7
+ - Implementation defect (code doesn't match Canon)
8
+ - Feature Canon wrong (Canon doesn't match business intent)
9
+ - Undocumented behavior (neither covers this case)
10
+
11
+ Classification determines who fixes what.
12
+
13
+ TEAMSPEC RULES ENFORCED:
14
+ - TS-QA-002: Bug classification required (exactly one)
15
+ -->
16
+
17
+ > **Template Version**: 2.0
18
+ > **Last Updated**: 2026-01-07
19
+
20
+ ---
21
+
22
+ **Document Owner:** QA (QA Engineer)
23
+ **Artifact Type:** Defect Report
24
+ **Lifecycle:** Open → Resolved → Closed
25
+
26
+ ---
27
+
28
+ ## Metadata
29
+
30
+ | Field | Value |
31
+ | :--- | :--- |
32
+ | **Bug ID** | BUG-XXX |
33
+ | **Severity** | Critical / High / Medium / Low |
34
+ | **Priority** | P1 / P2 / P3 / P4 |
35
+ | **Environment** | Staging / Dev / Production |
36
+ | **Version** | [Build Number] |
37
+ | **Reporter** | [Name] |
38
+ | **Date Reported** | YYYY-MM-DD |
39
+ | **Status** | Open / In Progress / Resolved / Closed |
40
+
41
+ ---
42
+
43
+ ## Description
44
+
45
+ > Brief summary of the bug.
46
+
47
+ [Clear, concise description of what's wrong]
48
+
49
+ ---
50
+
51
+ ## Steps to Reproduce
52
+
53
+ 1. Go to ...
54
+ 2. Click ...
55
+ 3. Enter ...
56
+ 4. Observe ...
57
+
58
+ ---
59
+
60
+ ## Expected Result
61
+
62
+ > What should happen (reference Feature Canon if applicable).
63
+
64
+ **Feature Canon Reference:** [F-XXX](../../features/F-XXX-name.md), Section: [Section Name]
65
+
66
+ [What the system should do according to Feature Canon]
67
+
68
+ ---
69
+
70
+ ## Actual Result
71
+
72
+ > What actually happened.
73
+
74
+ [What the system actually does]
75
+
76
+ ---
77
+
78
+ ## Evidence
79
+
80
+ > Attach Screenshots/Logs/Videos
81
+
82
+ - [ ] Screenshot attached
83
+ - [ ] Console logs attached
84
+ - [ ] Network trace attached
85
+
86
+ ---
87
+
88
+ ## Bug Classification (MANDATORY)
89
+
90
+ <!-- TEAMSPEC RULE: TS-QA-002 - Exactly one must be checked -->
91
+
92
+ > ⚠️ Select **exactly ONE** classification. This determines who fixes what.
93
+
94
+ ### [ ] Implementation Defect
95
+
96
+ **Definition:** Code doesn't match Feature Canon documentation.
97
+
98
+ - **Evidence:** Feature Canon says [X], system does [Y]
99
+ - **Fix:** DEV fixes code to match Canon
100
+ - **Canon Update:** Not required
101
+
102
+ ### [ ] Feature Canon Wrong
103
+
104
+ **Definition:** Feature Canon doesn't match actual business intent.
105
+
106
+ - **Evidence:** Business expects [X], Canon says [Y]
107
+ - **Fix:** FA updates Feature Canon, then DEV updates code if needed
108
+ - **Canon Update:** Required
109
+
110
+ ### [ ] Undocumented Behavior
111
+
112
+ **Definition:** Neither code nor Feature Canon covers this case.
113
+
114
+ - **Evidence:** [Scenario] is not documented anywhere
115
+ - **Fix:** FA clarifies with BA, updates Canon, then DEV implements
116
+ - **Canon Update:** Required
117
+
118
+ ---
119
+
120
+ ## Classification Decision Tree
121
+
122
+ ```
123
+ Is the behavior documented in Feature Canon?
124
+ ├── YES → Does code match Canon?
125
+ │ ├── YES → Not a bug (or Canon is wrong → "Feature Canon Wrong")
126
+ │ └── NO → "Implementation Defect"
127
+ └── NO → "Undocumented Behavior"
128
+ ```
129
+
130
+ ---
131
+
132
+ ## Resolution Actions by Classification
133
+
134
+ | Classification | Who Fixes | Action |
135
+ |----------------|-----------|--------|
136
+ | Implementation Defect | DEV | Fix code to match Canon |
137
+ | Feature Canon Wrong | FA → DEV | FA updates Canon; DEV updates code if needed |
138
+ | Undocumented Behavior | FA + BA → DEV | FA clarifies with BA; updates Canon; DEV implements |
139
+
140
+ ---
141
+
142
+ ## Feature Reference
143
+
144
+ | Feature | Section | Expected Behavior |
145
+ |---------|---------|-------------------|
146
+ | [F-XXX](../../features/F-XXX-name.md) | [Section] | [Brief description from Canon] |
147
+
148
+ ---
149
+
150
+ ## Related Stories / Bugs
151
+
152
+ | ID | Type | Relationship |
153
+ |----|------|--------------|
154
+ | [S-XXX] | Story | Introduced behavior |
155
+ | [BUG-YYY] | Bug | Related issue |
156
+
157
+ ---
158
+
159
+ ## Resolution
160
+
161
+ **Resolved By:** ________________
162
+ **Resolution Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
163
+ **Resolution Type:** Code Fix / Canon Update / Not a Bug / Duplicate
164
+ **Fix Version:** [Build Number]
165
+
166
+ **Resolution Notes:**
167
+
168
+ [How the bug was fixed]
169
+
170
+ ---
171
+
172
+ ## Verification
173
+
174
+ **Verified By:** ________________
175
+ **Verification Date:** YYYY-MM-DD
176
+ **Verification Environment:** [Environment]
177
+
178
+ - [ ] Bug no longer reproduces
179
+ - [ ] Feature Canon is accurate
180
+ - [ ] Regression tests added
181
+
182
+ ---
183
+
184
+ ## Linter Rules Enforced
185
+
186
+ | Rule | Description |
187
+ |------|-------------|
188
+ | TS-QA-002 | Bug classification required (exactly one) |
@@ -0,0 +1,164 @@
1
+ # Business Analysis Document: [Feature Name]
2
+
3
+ <!--
4
+ ⚠️ THIS IS A PLANNING ARTIFACT, NOT SOURCE OF TRUTH
5
+
6
+ This Business Analysis document captures analysis and decisions
7
+ during the planning phase.
8
+
9
+ SOURCE OF TRUTH:
10
+ - For current system behavior → Feature Canon (/features/F-XXX.md)
11
+ - For business decisions → Decision Log (/decisions/DEC-XXX.md)
12
+
13
+ This document becomes HISTORICAL after Feature Canon is created.
14
+ -->
15
+
16
+ > **Template Version**: 2.0
17
+ > **Last Updated**: 2026-01-07
18
+
19
+ ---
20
+
21
+ **Document Owner:** BA (Business Analyst)
22
+ **Artifact Type:** Planning (Not Source of Truth)
23
+ **Lifecycle:** Historical after Feature Canon creation
24
+
25
+ | Metadata | Details |
26
+ | :--- | :--- |
27
+ | **Status** | Draft / In Review / Approved |
28
+ | **Owner** | [BA Name] |
29
+ | **Stakeholders** | [Names] |
30
+ | **Created** | YYYY-MM-DD |
31
+
32
+ ---
33
+
34
+ ## 1. Executive Summary
35
+
36
+ - **Problem Statement**: Who is the user? What is their pain?
37
+ - **Proposed Solution**: High-level description.
38
+ - **Value**: Why are we doing this? (Revenue, Compliance, UX).
39
+
40
+ ---
41
+
42
+ ## 2. Scope
43
+
44
+ ### In Scope
45
+
46
+ - [Feature 1]
47
+ - [Feature 2]
48
+
49
+ ### Out of Scope (Non-Goals)
50
+
51
+ - [Feature 3]
52
+ - [Migration of X]
53
+
54
+ ---
55
+
56
+ ## 3. Related Feature Canon
57
+
58
+ > ⚠️ Link to Feature Canon files created from this analysis.
59
+ > Once features are created, the Feature Canon is authoritative.
60
+ > This document is retained for historical context only.
61
+
62
+ | Feature ID | Feature Name | Status | Link |
63
+ |------------|--------------|--------|------|
64
+ | [F-XXX](../features/F-XXX-name.md) | [Feature Name] | Draft / Active | |
65
+
66
+ ---
67
+
68
+ ## 4. Business Process
69
+
70
+ ### Current State (As-Is)
71
+
72
+ > Describe how users solve the problem today.
73
+
74
+ ### Future State (To-Be)
75
+
76
+ > Describe the new workflow. This becomes the Feature Canon "Current Behavior" after implementation.
77
+
78
+ ---
79
+
80
+ ## 5. User Journeys / Personas
81
+
82
+ | Persona | Journey | Goal |
83
+ |---------|---------|------|
84
+ | [Persona 1] | [Action sequence] | [What they achieve] |
85
+ | [Persona 2] | [Action sequence] | [What they achieve] |
86
+
87
+ ---
88
+
89
+ ## 6. Business Rules & Logic
90
+
91
+ > These business rules will be documented in the Feature Canon as BR-XXX references.
92
+
93
+ | Rule ID | Description | Context |
94
+ |---------|-------------|---------|
95
+ | BR-001 | [Rule description] | [When it applies] |
96
+ | BR-002 | [Rule description] | [When it applies] |
97
+
98
+ ---
99
+
100
+ ## 7. Data & Reporting Requirements
101
+
102
+ - **Data Captured**: [Fields]
103
+ - **Reporting Needs**: [Reports needed]
104
+
105
+ ---
106
+
107
+ ## 8. Risks & Constraints
108
+
109
+ ### Risks
110
+
111
+ | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation |
112
+ |------|------------|--------|------------|
113
+ | [Risk 1] | Low/Med/High | Low/Med/High | [Mitigation] |
114
+
115
+ ### Constraints
116
+
117
+ - **Timeline**: [Deadlines]
118
+ - **Budget**: [Budget constraints]
119
+ - **Technical**: [Legacy systems, integrations]
120
+
121
+ ---
122
+
123
+ ## 9. Success Metrics (KPIs)
124
+
125
+ | Metric | Target | Measurement Method |
126
+ |--------|--------|-------------------|
127
+ | [Metric 1] | [Target value] | [How measured] |
128
+ | [Metric 2] | [Target value] | [How measured] |
129
+
130
+ ---
131
+
132
+ ## 10. Decisions Made
133
+
134
+ > Business decisions from this analysis should be logged in /decisions/
135
+
136
+ | Decision ID | Summary | Link |
137
+ |-------------|---------|------|
138
+ | [DEC-XXX](../decisions/DEC-XXX-*.md) | [Decision summary] | |
139
+
140
+ ---
141
+
142
+ ## Document Lifecycle
143
+
144
+ > ⚠️ **IMPORTANT**: This document is a **planning artifact**.
145
+ >
146
+ > After Feature Canon is established and updated through story implementation:
147
+ > - This document becomes **historical reference** only
148
+ > - The **Feature Canon** is the source of truth for current behavior
149
+ > - Do NOT use this document to understand how the system works today
150
+ >
151
+ > If you need to know what the system does now, read `/features/F-XXX-name.md`
152
+
153
+ ### Status Transitions
154
+
155
+ | Status | Meaning |
156
+ |--------|---------|
157
+ | Draft | Analysis in progress |
158
+ | In Review | Stakeholder review |
159
+ | Approved | Ready for Feature Canon creation |
160
+ | **Superseded** | Feature Canon is now authoritative |
161
+
162
+ **Current Status:** Draft
163
+ **Superseded By:** [F-XXX](../features/F-XXX-name.md) (when applicable)
164
+ **Superseded Date:** ________________