taste-lint 0.3.0 → 0.4.0

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "taste-lint",
-  "version": "0.3.0",
+  "version": "0.4.0",
   "description": "Taste linter: copy and typography rules from agent-skills answered by TypeSafe Jev probabilities, with mechanical checks, calibration and a scorecard",
   "keywords": [
     "copywriting",
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
     "mdast-util-to-string": "^4.0.0",
     "micromark-extension-gfm": "^3.0.0",
     "micromark-extension-mdxjs": "^3.0.0",
-    "oxc-parser": "^0.150.0",
+    "oxc-parser": "^0.151.0",
     "parse5": "^8.0.1",
     "yaml": "^2.9.1"
   },

package/data/rules/copywriting/copywriting-idea-repetition.yaml

@@ -1,34 +0,0 @@
-# One of the 21 AI-writing checks Every ran with Jev (Mike Taylor, "Jev judged
-# everything I've written in 0.7 seconds", 15 Sep 2026). The question is the
-# published wording; the second sentence says what to ignore.
-id: copywriting-idea-repetition
-title: Repeats the same idea without adding new evidence
-categoryId: machine-prose
-source:
-  repo: every.to
-  path: https://typesafe-parallel-judgment-lab.every-4573.chatgpt.site/downloads/typesafe-lab-source.zip (scripts/run-ai-checker.mjs)
-  line: 1
-  ruleId: idea_repetition
-unit: [paragraph]
-question:
-  context: [docType, section]
-  instructions: >-
-    Does TEXT repeat an idea within SECTION without adding new evidence? Judge TEXT only, using SECTION to distinguish repetition from a useful summary. Ignore a deliberate one-sentence summary at the end of a long section, and a repeated term that is the subject of the passage.
-  criteria:
-    true:
-      what: Restatement with nothing new.
-      examples:
-        - "Speed matters to users. Users care deeply about how fast the product feels. Performance is a priority because people value speed."
-        - "The tool saves time. It is a real time-saver that helps teams reclaim hours."
-    false:
-      what: Each sentence carries its own fact, example or consequence.
-      examples:
-        - "Speed matters to users: a 400ms dropdown loses a click one time in five in our logs. The fix cut it to 180ms."
-        - "The tool saves time. Last quarter the team closed 30 percent more tickets with the same headcount."
-thresholds: { review: 0.4, act: 0.75 }
-severity: minor
-fix:
-  hint: >-
-    Cut the restatement or replace it with the evidence it was standing in for.
-status: review-only
-handWritten: [question, fix, thresholds]