task-pipeline-skill 1.49.1 → 1.49.2

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
package/CHANGELOG.md CHANGED
@@ -1,5 +1,45 @@
1
1
  # Changelog
2
2
 
3
+ ## v1.49.2 — four stray table rows, and a list that promised three and delivered two
4
+
5
+ ### Fixed
6
+
7
+ - **The body shipped a rendering defect.** Four rows of the built-in-doctrine
8
+ index — `artifacts.md`, `companion-skills.md`, `conventions.md`,
9
+ `model-tiering.md` — sat between the grill's bullet list and `## How to run`
10
+ with no header row above them. GFM needs a delimiter row to open a table, so an
11
+ agent reading `SKILL.md` saw four lines of literal pipes. Moved back into the
12
+ index where their shape says they belong.
13
+
14
+ - **"Three things the grill does beyond clarifying the request" listed two.** The
15
+ displaced rows had taken the third with them. Restored from
16
+ `references/grill.md`, which still carries it in full: **the design
17
+ destination** — which Figma file, in which team, decided at stage 0 rather than
18
+ at drawing time. Restored rather than renumbered, because the reference proves
19
+ what was lost; renumbering to "two" would have made the body agree with itself
20
+ and disagree with the doctrine.
21
+
22
+ Guards: 309 → **309**. Property checks: 9 → 9. This release restores content and
23
+ adds no enforcement — the defect was structural markdown, which no guard here
24
+ reads, and the count is stated because two probes read the newest section.
25
+
26
+ ### Note on the token budget
27
+
28
+ The body is **5969 tokens against a 5000 cap**, up 108: the restored bullet costs
29
+ more than the four moved rows save. Correctness first — a body promising three
30
+ items and delivering two, with four lines rendering as garbage, is worse than
31
+ being over a soft cap it was already over.
32
+
33
+ The gap is now measured rather than estimated, so it stops being re-litigated by
34
+ prose trims. Three attempts at trimming prose produced 35 tokens between them. The
35
+ whole doctrine index is 555 tokens — 320 in the descriptive column, 235 in the
36
+ reference names — so compressing every description to nothing closes at most **26%
37
+ of the 1219-token gap**, and less than that if the stage numbers stay, which are
38
+ the navigational value. The remainder lives in the Stages table's `Gate` column
39
+ (`grep -c '^\*\*Gate' references/stages.md` → **0**: the body is its only home)
40
+ and in the five-step operating procedure. Closing the gap therefore means moving
41
+ content into references — a restructuring of the skill, not a trim.
42
+
3
43
  ## v1.49.1 — the entry states the count its own guard reads
4
44
 
5
45
  ### Fixed
package/SKILL-CARD.md CHANGED
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ harmless.
12
12
  |---|---|
13
13
  | **Purpose** | Runs a substantial task through ten gated delivery stages — intake grill, docs study, brainstorm, spec, plan, subagent build, tests, lint/deploy, post-deploy, docs+registers, acceptance — refusing to advance until each gate passes |
14
14
  | **Owner** | ssheleg ([github.com/ssheleg/task-pipeline](https://github.com/ssheleg/task-pipeline)) |
15
- | **Version** | 1.49.1 |
15
+ | **Version** | 1.49.2 |
16
16
  | **Surface** | Claude Code (filesystem skill + plugin) and the vercel `skills` CLI. **Not** uploaded to the Skills API; custom Skills do not sync across surfaces |
17
17
  | **Dependencies** | None required. Optional: `context7` (MCP), `figma` (MCP), super-ux, agent-sync, graphify, obsidian-wiki. Every stage's doctrine ships in-repo; the one conditional requirement is super-ux for the stage-3 UX track on a user-facing task |
18
18
  | **Evaluation status** | Suite authored, 5 categories. One recorded run, **self-observed by the author**; **zero blind runs on zero of three models** — the split, and the numbers, live in [`evals/RESULTS.md`](evals/RESULTS.md) and are computed by `evals/run.py` |
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "task-pipeline-skill",
3
- "version": "1.49.1",
3
+ "version": "1.49.2",
4
4
  "description": "Full-cycle delivery pipeline for coding agents: a mandatory built-in intake grill, then 10 gated stages (docs, brainstorm+decompose, spec, plan, build, tests, lint/deploy, post-deploy, docs/wiki, acceptance). Every stage's doctrine ships inside the skill — no companion plugin required. This package is the installer CLI.",
5
5
  "bin": {
6
6
  "task-pipeline": "bin/task-pipeline.js"
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
2
2
  "name": "task-pipeline",
3
3
  "displayName": "Task Pipeline",
4
4
  "description": "Runs a substantial task through a mandatory built-in intake grill, then 10 gated stages (docs, brainstorm+decompose, spec, plan, subagent build, tests, lint/deploy, post-deploy, docs/wiki, acceptance). Every stage's doctrine is built into the skill — no companion plugin required — with typed auto/manual gates, a frozen requirement spine that closes with evidence, a work board and a verification ledger that outlive a run, an exposure line naming what shipped unconfirmed, a progress rail computed from the project's own config, a loop guard whose review ceiling measures rather than stops, and stage-3 tracks for what a product does, how it sounds and how it looks. Two modes need no task: `checkup` (what is unverified) and `setup` (audit existing docs). Retro insights can publish upstream as issues, opt-in and redacted.",
5
- "version": "1.49.1",
5
+ "version": "1.49.2",
6
6
  "author": {
7
7
  "name": "ssheleg",
8
8
  "url": "https://x.com/sshlg93"
@@ -73,6 +73,10 @@ gate stops until it is installed.
73
73
  | run-wide · the work-list **between** runs, and how its priority is computed | `references/backlog.md` |
74
74
  | run-wide · whether a **human** ever confirmed what shipped, and when | `references/verification.md` |
75
75
  | run-wide · how much unconfirmed work has piled up, and what to look at first | `references/exposure.md` |
76
+ | any stage · Where each artifact belongs | `references/artifacts.md` |
77
+ | preflight · Companion skills and their fallbacks | `references/companion-skills.md` |
78
+ | 6–10 · How the host project's CLAUDE.md is read | `references/conventions.md` |
79
+ | preflight · Model map, ids and the override | `references/model-tiering.md` |
76
80
 
77
81
  **Optional bridge.** An equivalent skill set the operator already runs (e.g.
78
82
  `superpowers:brainstorming` / `writing-plans` / `subagent-driven-development` /
@@ -152,10 +156,12 @@ Three things the grill does beyond clarifying the request:
152
156
  mid-flight (test/lint/deploy commands, branch policy, log locations, docs
153
157
  targets, the model decision, deploy authorization). Autonomy is bought here or
154
158
  not at all — an unasked question is a scheduled interruption.
155
- | any stage · Where each artifact belongs | `references/artifacts.md` |
156
- | preflight · Companion skills and their fallbacks | `references/companion-skills.md` |
157
- | 6–10 · How the host project's CLAUDE.md is read | `references/conventions.md` |
158
- | preflight · Model map, ids and the override | `references/model-tiering.md` |
159
+ - **The design destination**, when the project designs in Figma: *which* file, in
160
+ which team a stage-0 decision, never a stage-3 side effect. Left to drawing
161
+ time the question is answered by whoever is holding the brush, and the answer is
162
+ usually *create a new file* which is how a project ends up with three files
163
+ called some variation of "Design", each with real work in it and no way to tell
164
+ which one the team opens.
159
165
 
160
166
  ## How to run
161
167