tailwindcss 0.0.0-insiders.eebf529 → 0.0.0-insiders.ef2ebb2

package/src/lib/regex.js

@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
+const REGEX_SPECIAL = /[\\^$.*+?()[\]{}|]/g
+const REGEX_HAS_SPECIAL = RegExp(REGEX_SPECIAL.source)
+
+/**
+ * @param {string|RegExp|Array<string|RegExp>} source
+ */
+function toSource(source) {
+  source = Array.isArray(source) ? source : [source]
+
+  source = source.map((item) => (item instanceof RegExp ? item.source : item))
+
+  return source.join('')
+}
+
+/**
+ * @param {string|RegExp|Array<string|RegExp>} source
+ */
+export function pattern(source) {
+  return new RegExp(toSource(source), 'g')
+}
+
+/**
+ * @param {string|RegExp|Array<string|RegExp>} source
+ */
+export function withoutCapturing(source) {
+  return new RegExp(`(?:${toSource(source)})`, 'g')
+}
+
+/**
+ * @param {Array<string|RegExp>} sources
+ */
+export function any(sources) {
+  return `(?:${sources.map(toSource).join('|')})`
+}
+
+/**
+ * @param {string|RegExp} source
+ */
+export function optional(source) {
+  return `(?:${toSource(source)})?`
+}
+
+/**
+ * @param {string|RegExp|Array<string|RegExp>} source
+ */
+export function zeroOrMore(source) {
+  return `(?:${toSource(source)})*`
+}
+
+/**
+ * Generate a RegExp that matches balanced brackets for a given depth
+ * We have to specify a depth because JS doesn't support recursive groups using ?R
+ *
+ * Based on https://stackoverflow.com/questions/17759004/how-to-match-string-within-parentheses-nested-in-java/17759264#17759264
+ *
+ * @param {string|RegExp|Array<string|RegExp>} source
+ */
+export function nestedBrackets(open, close, depth = 1) {
+  return withoutCapturing([
+    escape(open),
+    /[^\s]*/,
+    depth === 1
+      ? `[^${escape(open)}${escape(close)}\s]*`
+      : any([`[^${escape(open)}${escape(close)}\s]*`, nestedBrackets(open, close, depth - 1)]),
+    /[^\s]*/,
+    escape(close),
+  ])
+}
+
+export function escape(string) {
+  return string && REGEX_HAS_SPECIAL.test(string)
+    ? string.replace(REGEX_SPECIAL, '\\$&')
+    : string || ''
+}

package/src/lib/remap-bitfield.js

@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
+// @ts-check
+
+/**
+ * We must remap all the old bits to new bits for each set variant
+ * Only arbitrary variants are considered as those are the only
+ * ones that need to be re-sorted at this time
+ *
+ * An iterated process that removes and sets individual bits simultaneously
+ * will not work because we may have a new bit that is also a later old bit
+ * This means that we would be removing a previously set bit which we don't
+ * want to do
+ *
+ * For example (assume `bN` = `1<<N`)
+ * Given the "total" mapping `[[b1, b3], [b2, b4], [b3, b1], [b4, b2]]`
+ * The mapping is "total" because:
+ * 1. Every input and output is accounted for
+ * 2. All combinations are unique
+ * 3. No one input maps to multiple outputs and vice versa
+ * And, given an offset with all bits set:
+ * V = b1 | b2 | b3 | b4
+ *
+ * Let's explore the issue with removing and setting bits simultaneously:
+ * V & ~b1 | b3 = b2 | b3 | b4
+ * V & ~b2 | b4 = b3 | b4
+ * V & ~b3 | b1 = b1 | b4
+ * V & ~b4 | b2 = b1 | b2
+ *
+ * As you can see, we end up with the wrong result.
+ * This is because we're removing a bit that was previously set.
+ * And, thus the final result is missing b3 and b4.
+ *
+ * Now, let's explore the issue with removing the bits first:
+ * V & ~b1 = b2 | b3 | b4
+ * V & ~b2 = b3 | b4
+ * V & ~b3 = b4
+ * V & ~b4 = 0
+ *
+ * And then setting the bits:
+ * V | b3 = b3
+ * V | b4 = b3 | b4
+ * V | b1 = b1 | b3 | b4
+ * V | b2 = b1 | b2 | b3 | b4
+ *
+ * We get the correct result because we're not removing any bits that were
+ * previously set thus properly remapping the bits to the new order
+ *
+ * To collect this into a single operation that can be done simultaneously
+ * we must first create a mask for the old bits that are set and a mask for
+ * the new bits that are set. Then we can remove the old bits and set the new
+ * bits simultaneously in a "single" operation like so:
+ * OldMask = b1 | b2 | b3 | b4
+ * NewMask = b3 | b4 | b1 | b2
+ *
+ * So this:
+ * V & ~oldMask | newMask
+ *
+ * Expands to this:
+ * V & ~b1 & ~b2 & ~b3 & ~b4 | b3 | b4 | b1 | b2
+ *
+ * Which becomes this:
+ * b1 | b2 | b3 | b4
+ *
+ * Which is the correct result!
+ *
+ * @param {bigint} num
+ * @param {[bigint, bigint][]} mapping
+ */
+export function remapBitfield(num, mapping) {
+  // Create masks for the old and new bits that are set
+  let oldMask = 0n
+  let newMask = 0n
+  for (let [oldBit, newBit] of mapping) {
+    if (num & oldBit) {
+      oldMask = oldMask | oldBit
+      newMask = newMask | newBit
+    }
+  }
+
+  // Remove all old bits
+  // Set all new bits
+  return (num & ~oldMask) | newMask
+}

package/src/lib/resolveDefaultsAtRules.js

@@ -71,6 +71,8 @@ function extractElementSelector(selector) {
 export default function resolveDefaultsAtRules({ tailwindConfig }) {
   return (root) => {
     let variableNodeMap = new Map()
+
+    /** @type {Set<import('postcss').AtRule>} */
     let universals = new Set()
 
     root.walkAtRules('defaults', (rule) => {
@@ -89,33 +91,73 @@ export default function resolveDefaultsAtRules({ tailwindConfig }) {
       rule.remove()
     })
 
-    for (let universal of universals) {
-      let selectors = new Set()
+    if (flagEnabled(tailwindConfig, 'optimizeUniversalDefaults')) {
+      for (let universal of universals) {
+        /** @type {Map<string, Set<string>>} */
+        let selectorGroups = new Map()
+
+        let rules = variableNodeMap.get(universal.params) ?? []
 
-      let rules = variableNodeMap.get(universal.params) ?? []
+        for (let rule of rules) {
+          for (let selector of extractElementSelector(rule.selector)) {
+            // If selector contains a vendor prefix after a pseudo element or class,
+            // we consider them separately because merging the declarations into
+            // a single rule will cause browsers that do not understand the
+            // vendor prefix to throw out the whole rule
+            let selectorGroupName =
+              selector.includes(':-') || selector.includes('::-') ? selector : '__DEFAULT__'
 
-      for (let rule of rules) {
-        for (let selector of extractElementSelector(rule.selector)) {
-          selectors.add(selector)
+            let selectors = selectorGroups.get(selectorGroupName) ?? new Set()
+            selectorGroups.set(selectorGroupName, selectors)
+
+            selectors.add(selector)
+          }
+        }
+
+        if (flagEnabled(tailwindConfig, 'optimizeUniversalDefaults')) {
+          if (selectorGroups.size === 0) {
+            universal.remove()
+            continue
+          }
+
+          for (let [, selectors] of selectorGroups) {
+            let universalRule = postcss.rule({
+              source: universal.source,
+            })
+
+            universalRule.selectors = [...selectors]
+
+            universalRule.append(universal.nodes.map((node) => node.clone()))
+            universal.before(universalRule)
+          }
         }
-      }
 
-      if (selectors.size === 0) {
         universal.remove()
-        continue
       }
+    } else if (universals.size) {
+      let universalRule = postcss.rule({
+        selectors: ['*', '::before', '::after'],
+      })
+
+      for (let universal of universals) {
+        universalRule.append(universal.nodes)
 
-      let universalRule = postcss.rule()
+        if (!universalRule.parent) {
+          universal.before(universalRule)
+        }
 
-      if (flagEnabled(tailwindConfig, 'optimizeUniversalDefaults')) {
-        universalRule.selectors = [...selectors]
-      } else {
-        universalRule.selectors = ['*', '::before', '::after']
+        if (!universalRule.source) {
+          universalRule.source = universal.source
+        }
+
+        universal.remove()
       }
 
-      universalRule.append(universal.nodes)
-      universal.before(universalRule)
-      universal.remove()
+      let backdropRule = universalRule.clone({
+        selectors: ['::backdrop'],
+      })
+
+      universalRule.after(backdropRule)
     }
   }
 }