tachibot-mcp 2.0.2

package/dist/src/workflows.js

@@ -0,0 +1,568 @@
+import { WorkflowType } from './types.js';
+export const workflows = {
+    [WorkflowType.CREATIVE_DISCOVERY]: {
+        name: '🎨 Creative Discovery',
+        type: WorkflowType.CREATIVE_DISCOVERY,
+        description: 'Generate innovative ideas and explore possibilities',
+        steps: [
+            {
+                tool: 'gemini_brainstorm',
+                promptTechnique: 'what_if_speculation',
+                adaptationCheck: true
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'openai_brainstorm',
+                promptTechnique: 'alternative_perspectives',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'perplexity_research',
+                promptTechnique: 'evidence_gathering',
+                optional: true,
+                adaptationCheck: true,
+                adaptationThreshold: 300
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'think',
+                promptTechnique: 'quick_reflection',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'openai_reason',
+                promptTechnique: 'feasibility_analysis',
+                optional: false
+            }
+        ],
+        visualTemplate: `
+     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@
+     @  ★ ★  @     @  ◎ ◎  @     @  ○ ○  @     @  ● ●  @     @  ◉ ◉  @
+     @ \\___// @     @   ~   @     @  \\_/  @     @   ◡   @     @   -   @
+     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@
+     gemini[{g}] → openai[{o}] → perplexity[{p}]? → think[{t}] → reason[{r}]
+     
+🧠 Technique: {technique}
+📊 Progress: {progress}
+💭 Current: {current}`
+    },
+    [WorkflowType.DEEP_RESEARCH]: {
+        name: '🔬 Deep Research',
+        type: WorkflowType.DEEP_RESEARCH,
+        description: 'Comprehensive investigation with evidence gathering',
+        steps: [
+            {
+                tool: 'perplexity_research',
+                promptTechnique: 'comprehensive_investigation',
+                adaptationCheck: true,
+                adaptationThreshold: 500
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'think',
+                promptTechnique: 'pattern_recognition',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'openai_reason',
+                promptTechnique: 'systematic_analysis',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'gemini_brainstorm',
+                promptTechnique: 'creative_applications',
+                optional: true
+            }
+        ],
+        visualTemplate: `
+     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@
+     @  ○ ○  @     @  ● ●  @     @  ◉ ◉  @     @  ★ ★  @
+     @  \\_/  @     @   ◡   @     @   ~   @     @ \\o// @
+     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@
+     perplex[{p}] → think[{t}] → reason[{r}] → gemini[{g}]
+     
+🔍 Technique: {technique}
+📊 Progress: {progress}
+📚 Current: {current}`
+    },
+    [WorkflowType.PROBLEM_SOLVING]: {
+        name: '🧩 Problem Solving',
+        type: WorkflowType.PROBLEM_SOLVING,
+        description: 'Break down and solve complex problems systematically',
+        steps: [
+            {
+                tool: 'think',
+                promptTechnique: 'problem_decomposition',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'openai_reason',
+                promptTechnique: 'first_principles',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'perplexity_research',
+                promptTechnique: 'evidence_gathering',
+                optional: false,
+                adaptationCheck: true
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'gemini_brainstorm',
+                promptTechnique: 'innovative_solutions',
+                optional: false
+            }
+        ],
+        visualTemplate: `
+     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@
+     @  ● ●  @     @  ◉ ◉  @     @  ○ ○  @     @  ★ ★  @
+     @   ◡   @     @   ≡   @     @  \\_/  @     @   !   @
+     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@
+     think[{t}] → reason[{r}] → perplex[{p}] → gemini[{g}]
+     
+🔧 Technique: {technique}
+📊 Progress: {progress}
+💡 Current: {current}`
+    },
+    [WorkflowType.SYNTHESIS]: {
+        name: '🎯 Synthesis',
+        type: WorkflowType.SYNTHESIS,
+        description: 'Combine multiple perspectives into coherent insights',
+        steps: [
+            {
+                tool: 'gemini_brainstorm',
+                promptTechnique: 'exploratory_angles',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'perplexity_research',
+                promptTechnique: 'comprehensive_data',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'openai_reason',
+                promptTechnique: 'analytical_framework',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'think',
+                promptTechnique: 'integration_reflection',
+                optional: false
+            }
+        ],
+        visualTemplate: `
+     gemini[{g}] ↘
+                  ↘
+     perplex[{p}] → think[{t}] → SYNTHESIS
+                  ↗
+     openai[{o}] ↗
+     
+🔀 Technique: {technique}
+📊 Progress: {progress}
+🎯 Current: {current}`
+    },
+    [WorkflowType.FACT_CHECK]: {
+        name: '✅ Fact Check',
+        type: WorkflowType.FACT_CHECK,
+        description: 'Validate claims and ideas with evidence-based analysis',
+        steps: [
+            {
+                tool: 'think',
+                promptTechnique: 'problem_decomposition',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'perplexity_research',
+                promptTechnique: 'comprehensive_investigation',
+                adaptationCheck: true,
+                adaptationThreshold: 500
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'openai_reason',
+                promptTechnique: 'systematic_analysis',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'gemini_brainstorm',
+                promptTechnique: 'alternative_perspectives',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'think',
+                promptTechnique: 'integration_reflection',
+                optional: false
+            }
+        ],
+        visualTemplate: `
+     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@
+     @  ● ●  @     @  ○ ○  @     @  ◉ ◉  @     @  ★ ★  @     @  ● ●  @
+     @   ?   @     @  \\_/  @     @   ≡   @     @   ~   @     @   !   @
+     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@
+     think[{t}] → perplex[{p}] → reason[{r}] → gemini[{g}] → think[{t2}]
+     
+✅ Technique: {technique}
+📊 Progress: {progress}
+🔍 Current: {current}`
+    },
+    // Developer-Focused Workflows
+    [WorkflowType.RAPID_PROTOTYPE]: {
+        name: '🚀 Rapid Prototype',
+        type: WorkflowType.RAPID_PROTOTYPE,
+        description: 'From idea to working demo in minutes',
+        steps: [
+            {
+                tool: 'scout',
+                promptTechnique: 'requirement_gathering',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'architect',
+                promptTechnique: 'system_design',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'code_reviewer',
+                promptTechnique: 'design_validation',
+                optional: true
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'documentation_writer',
+                promptTechnique: 'quick_documentation',
+                optional: true
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'think',
+                promptTechnique: 'prototype_synthesis',
+                optional: false
+            }
+        ],
+        visualTemplate: `
+     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@
+     @  🔍  @     @  🏗️  @     @  ✅  @     @  📝  @     @  🎯  @
+     @scout @     @archi @     @review@     @ docs @     @synth@
+     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@
+     scout[{s}] → arch[{a}] → review[{r}] → docs[{d}] → think[{t}]
+     
+🚀 Technique: {technique}
+📊 Progress: {progress}
+⚡ Current: {current}`
+    },
+    [WorkflowType.CODE_QUALITY]: {
+        name: '🔧 Code Quality',
+        type: WorkflowType.CODE_QUALITY,
+        description: 'Comprehensive code improvement pipeline',
+        steps: [
+            {
+                tool: 'code_reviewer',
+                promptTechnique: 'comprehensive_review',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'test_architect',
+                promptTechnique: 'test_generation',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'challenger',
+                promptTechnique: 'code_questioning',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'auditor',
+                promptTechnique: 'quality_audit',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'think',
+                promptTechnique: 'quality_synthesis',
+                optional: false
+            }
+        ],
+        visualTemplate: `
+     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@
+     @  👀  @     @  🧪  @     @  ⚔️  @     @  🔍  @     @  💎  @
+     @review@     @ test @     @chall @     @audit @     @synth@
+     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@
+     review[{r}] → test[{t}] → chall[{c}] → audit[{a}] → think[{s}]
+     
+🔧 Technique: {technique}
+📊 Progress: {progress}
+💎 Current: {current}`
+    },
+    [WorkflowType.SECURE_DEPLOYMENT]: {
+        name: '🛡️ Secure Deployment',
+        type: WorkflowType.SECURE_DEPLOYMENT,
+        description: 'Security-first deployment pipeline',
+        steps: [
+            {
+                tool: 'auditor',
+                promptTechnique: 'security_audit',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'commit_guardian',
+                promptTechnique: 'pre_deploy_validation',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'verifier',
+                promptTechnique: 'deployment_verification',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'challenger',
+                promptTechnique: 'security_questioning',
+                optional: true
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'think',
+                promptTechnique: 'deployment_synthesis',
+                optional: false
+            }
+        ],
+        visualTemplate: `
+     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@
+     @  🔒  @     @  🛡️  @     @  ✅  @     @  ⚔️  @     @  🚀  @
+     @audit @     @guard @     @verify@     @chall @     @deploy@
+     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@
+     audit[{a}] → guard[{g}] → verify[{v}] → chall[{c}] → think[{d}]
+     
+🛡️ Technique: {technique}
+📊 Progress: {progress}
+🔐 Current: {current}`
+    },
+    [WorkflowType.FULL_STACK_DEVELOPMENT]: {
+        name: '🏗️ Full-Stack Dev',
+        type: WorkflowType.FULL_STACK_DEVELOPMENT,
+        description: 'End-to-end feature development',
+        steps: [
+            {
+                tool: 'architect',
+                promptTechnique: 'system_architecture',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'code_reviewer',
+                promptTechnique: 'implementation_review',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'test_architect',
+                promptTechnique: 'full_stack_testing',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'documentation_writer',
+                promptTechnique: 'comprehensive_docs',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'commit_guardian',
+                promptTechnique: 'final_validation',
+                optional: true
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'think',
+                promptTechnique: 'feature_synthesis',
+                optional: false
+            }
+        ],
+        visualTemplate: `
+     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@
+     @  🏗️  @     @  👀  @     @  🧪  @     @  📝  @     @  🛡️  @     @  ✨  @
+     @archi @     @review@     @ test @     @ docs @     @guard @     @synth@
+     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@
+     arch[{a}] → review[{r}] → test[{t}] → docs[{d}] → guard[{g}] → think[{s}]
+     
+🏗️ Technique: {technique}
+📊 Progress: {progress}
+🎯 Current: {current}`
+    },
+    [WorkflowType.TEST_DRIVEN_DEVELOPMENT]: {
+        name: '🧪 Test-Driven Dev',
+        type: WorkflowType.TEST_DRIVEN_DEVELOPMENT,
+        description: 'TDD workflow with comprehensive testing',
+        steps: [
+            {
+                tool: 'test_architect',
+                promptTechnique: 'test_first_design',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'code_reviewer',
+                promptTechnique: 'tdd_validation',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'challenger',
+                promptTechnique: 'test_questioning',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'verifier',
+                promptTechnique: 'test_verification',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'think',
+                promptTechnique: 'tdd_synthesis',
+                optional: false
+            }
+        ],
+        visualTemplate: `
+     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@
+     @  🧪  @     @  👀  @     @  ⚔️  @     @  ✅  @     @  🎯  @
+     @ test @     @review@     @chall @     @verify@     @synth@
+     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@
+     test[{t}] → review[{r}] → chall[{c}] → verify[{v}] → think[{s}]
+     
+🧪 Technique: {technique}
+📊 Progress: {progress}
+🔬 Current: {current}`
+    },
+    [WorkflowType.CODE_REVIEW_WORKFLOW]: {
+        name: '👁️ Code Review',
+        type: WorkflowType.CODE_REVIEW_WORKFLOW,
+        description: 'Thorough code review with learning',
+        steps: [
+            {
+                tool: 'code_reviewer',
+                promptTechnique: 'socratic_review',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'challenger',
+                promptTechnique: 'assumption_challenging',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'auditor',
+                promptTechnique: 'evidence_audit',
+                optional: true
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'think',
+                promptTechnique: 'review_synthesis',
+                optional: false
+            }
+        ],
+        visualTemplate: `
+     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@
+     @  👁️  @     @  ⚔️  @     @  🔍  @     @  🕵️  @     @  📋  @
+     @review@     @chall @     @audit @     @hunt  @     @synth@
+     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@
+     review[{r}] → chall[{c}] → audit[{a}] → hunt[{h}] → think[{s}]
+     
+👁️ Technique: {technique}
+📊 Progress: {progress}
+🔍 Current: {current}`
+    },
+    [WorkflowType.DOCUMENTATION_GENERATION]: {
+        name: '📚 Doc Generation',
+        type: WorkflowType.DOCUMENTATION_GENERATION,
+        description: 'Comprehensive documentation creation',
+        steps: [
+            {
+                tool: 'scout',
+                promptTechnique: 'code_exploration',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'documentation_writer',
+                promptTechnique: 'narrative_docs',
+                optional: false
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'code_reviewer',
+                promptTechnique: 'documentation_review',
+                optional: true
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'challenger',
+                promptTechnique: 'doc_questioning',
+                optional: true
+            },
+            {
+                tool: 'think',
+                promptTechnique: 'documentation_synthesis',
+                optional: false
+            }
+        ],
+        visualTemplate: `
+     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@
+     @  🔍  @     @  📝  @     @  👀  @     @  ❓  @     @  📚  @
+     @scout @     @ docs @     @review@     @chall @     @synth@
+     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@     @@@@@@@@@
+     scout[{s}] → docs[{d}] → review[{r}] → chall[{c}] → think[{t}]
+     
+📚 Technique: {technique}
+📊 Progress: {progress}
+✍️ Current: {current}`
+    }
+};
+// Prompt technique descriptions for user visibility
+export const promptTechniques = {
+    // Creative techniques
+    what_if_speculation: 'Exploring possibilities with "What if..." questions',
+    alternative_perspectives: 'Viewing from different angles and domains',
+    creative_applications: 'Finding innovative uses and connections',
+    innovative_solutions: 'Generating novel approaches to problems',
+    exploratory_angles: 'Discovering unexpected dimensions',
+    // Research techniques
+    comprehensive_investigation: 'Systematic data gathering with 5W1H framework',
+    evidence_gathering: 'Finding supporting and contradicting evidence',
+    comprehensive_data: 'Collecting data from multiple sources',
+    // Analytical techniques
+    systematic_analysis: 'Step-by-step logical examination',
+    first_principles: 'Breaking down to fundamental truths',
+    feasibility_analysis: 'Evaluating practical implementation',
+    analytical_framework: 'Structured analytical approach',
+    // Reflective techniques
+    quick_reflection: 'Brief pattern recognition and insight capture',
+    pattern_recognition: 'Identifying recurring themes and connections',
+    problem_decomposition: 'Breaking complex problems into components',
+    integration_reflection: 'Synthesizing insights from multiple sources',
+    // Developer-focused techniques
+    requirement_gathering: 'Extracting and clarifying project requirements',
+    system_design: 'Creating architectural blueprints and system design',
+    design_validation: 'Reviewing and validating design decisions',
+    quick_documentation: 'Rapid documentation generation for prototypes',
+    prototype_synthesis: 'Combining prototype elements into coherent design',
+    comprehensive_review: 'Thorough code analysis with multiple perspectives',
+    test_generation: 'Creating comprehensive test suites and edge cases',
+    code_questioning: 'Challenging code assumptions and design choices',
+    quality_audit: 'Systematic quality assessment and improvement suggestions',
+    quality_synthesis: 'Integrating quality insights into actionable recommendations',
+    security_audit: 'Deep security vulnerability analysis',
+    pre_deploy_validation: 'Pre-deployment checks and validations',
+    deployment_verification: 'Verifying deployment readiness and safety',
+    security_questioning: 'Challenging security assumptions and practices',
+    deployment_synthesis: 'Synthesizing deployment insights and recommendations',
+    system_architecture: 'End-to-end system architecture design',
+    implementation_review: 'Reviewing implementation against requirements',
+    full_stack_testing: 'Comprehensive testing across all system layers',
+    comprehensive_docs: 'Creating complete documentation suite',
+    final_validation: 'Final checks before feature completion',
+    feature_synthesis: 'Integrating all feature development insights',
+    test_first_design: 'Designing tests before implementation (TDD)',
+    tdd_validation: 'Validating TDD practices and test quality',
+    test_questioning: 'Challenging test coverage and effectiveness',
+    test_verification: 'Verifying test completeness and quality',
+    tdd_synthesis: 'Synthesizing TDD insights and recommendations',
+    socratic_review: 'Educational code review with guiding questions',
+    assumption_challenging: 'Challenging code and design assumptions',
+    evidence_audit: 'Requiring evidence for all claims and decisions',
+    dependency_tracing: 'Tracing code dependencies and relationships',
+    review_synthesis: 'Synthesizing review insights and learning points',
+    code_exploration: 'Exploring codebase structure and patterns',
+    narrative_docs: 'Creating engaging, story-driven documentation',
+    documentation_review: 'Reviewing documentation for clarity and completeness',
+    doc_questioning: 'Challenging documentation assumptions and gaps',
+    documentation_synthesis: 'Synthesizing documentation insights and improvements'
+};
+// Helper function to get visual status indicator
+export function getStatusIndicator(status) {
+    const indicators = {
+        idle: '  ',
+        processing: '..',
+        complete: '✓',
+        error: '!!'
+    };
+    return indicators[status] || '  ';
+}

package/dist/test-workflow-file-output.js

@@ -0,0 +1,93 @@
+/**
+ * Test script for workflow file output feature
+ *
+ * This tests the new saveToFile and loadFiles functionality in WorkflowEngine
+ */
+import { WorkflowEngine } from './src/workflows/workflow-engine.js';
+import * as fs from 'fs/promises';
+import * as path from 'path';
+async function testWorkflowFileOutput() {
+    console.log('🧪 Testing Workflow File Output Feature\n');
+    const engine = new WorkflowEngine();
+    // Test workflow with saveToFile and loadFiles
+    const testWorkflow = {
+        name: 'test-file-output',
+        description: 'Test file-based output and loading',
+        steps: [
+            {
+                id: 'step1',
+                mode: 'scout',
+                variant: 'research_scout',
+                maxTokens: 1000,
+                saveToFile: true
+            },
+            {
+                id: 'step2',
+                mode: 'scout',
+                variant: 'research_scout',
+                parallel: true,
+                maxTokens: 1000,
+                saveToFile: true
+            },
+            {
+                id: 'step3',
+                mode: 'synthesis',
+                maxTokens: 1000,
+                loadFiles: ['step1', 'step2'],
+                dependsOn: ['step1', 'step2']
+            }
+        ]
+    };
+    const query = 'Test query for file output feature';
+    try {
+        console.log('📝 Executing workflow...');
+        const result = await engine.executeWorkflow(testWorkflow, query);
+        console.log('\n✅ Workflow execution completed!');
+        console.log('\n📊 Results:');
+        console.log(JSON.stringify(result, null, 2));
+        // Verify output directory was created
+        if (result.outputDirectory) {
+            console.log(`\n📁 Output directory: ${result.outputDirectory}`);
+            // Check if manifest exists
+            const manifestPath = path.join(result.outputDirectory, 'manifest.json');
+            try {
+                const manifest = await fs.readFile(manifestPath, 'utf-8');
+                console.log('\n📋 Manifest:');
+                console.log(JSON.parse(manifest));
+            }
+            catch (error) {
+                console.error('❌ Failed to read manifest:', error);
+            }
+            // Check if step files exist
+            for (const stepId of ['step1', 'step2']) {
+                const stepFile = path.join(result.outputDirectory, `${stepId}.md`);
+                try {
+                    const content = await fs.readFile(stepFile, 'utf-8');
+                    console.log(`\n📄 ${stepId}.md exists (${content.length} characters)`);
+                }
+                catch (error) {
+                    console.error(`❌ Failed to read ${stepId}.md:`, error);
+                }
+            }
+        }
+        else {
+            console.log('⚠️  No output directory in result');
+        }
+        console.log('\n✨ Test completed successfully!');
+        return result;
+    }
+    catch (error) {
+        console.error('\n❌ Test failed:', error);
+        throw error;
+    }
+}
+// Run the test
+testWorkflowFileOutput()
+    .then(() => {
+    console.log('\n🎉 All tests passed!');
+    process.exit(0);
+})
+    .catch((error) => {
+    console.error('\n💥 Test failed with error:', error);
+    process.exit(1);
+});