synthesisui 0.16.88 → 0.16.90

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -288,7 +288,21 @@ async function validateRecipe(name, recipe) {
288
288
  const answer = await askCatalogue("validate", { name, recipe });
289
289
  if (!answer.ok)
290
290
  return answer.because;
291
- const v = answer.body;
291
+ const raw = answer.body;
292
+ /**
293
+ * THE WIRE IS NOT A TYPE SYSTEM. The schema-refusal branch of the API answered
294
+ * without a `checklist`, and this client read `v.checklist.length` unguarded - so the
295
+ * one recipe that most needed the validator crashed it, on every call, and a real
296
+ * import had to validate against the API by hand (test13, 01/08). Every field is
297
+ * defaulted; a shape this cannot read degrades to a sentence, never to a throw.
298
+ */
299
+ const v = {
300
+ ok: raw.ok === true,
301
+ rejected: raw.rejected ?? [],
302
+ lost: raw.lost ?? [],
303
+ missing: raw.missing ?? [],
304
+ checklist: raw.checklist ?? [],
305
+ };
292
306
  if (v.ok) {
293
307
  return `${name}: everything you sent would survive. Send it.`;
294
308
  }
@@ -532,8 +532,22 @@ function tokenRefFor(name) {
532
532
  }
533
533
  if (bare.startsWith("gradient-"))
534
534
  return `{gradients.${bare.slice(9)}}`;
535
- if (bare.startsWith("text-"))
535
+ if (bare.startsWith("text-")) {
536
+ // The companion token: `--text-body-s--line-height` names the line-height OF a
537
+ // step, and a double dash inside a ref is a grammar nothing accepts (test13).
538
+ const companion = /^text-(.+?)--(line-height|letter-spacing|font-weight)$/.exec(bare);
539
+ if (companion) {
540
+ const prop = {
541
+ "line-height": "lineHeight",
542
+ "letter-spacing": "letterSpacing",
543
+ "font-weight": "weight",
544
+ }[companion[2]];
545
+ return `{typography.scale.${companion[1]}.${prop}}`;
546
+ }
547
+ if (bare.slice(5).includes("--"))
548
+ return `var(${name})`;
536
549
  return `{typography.scale.${bare.slice(5)}.fontSize}`;
550
+ }
537
551
  if (bare.startsWith("font-"))
538
552
  return `{typography.families.${bare.slice(5)}}`;
539
553
  return `var(${name})`;
@@ -75,11 +75,19 @@ export function emptySignals() {
75
75
  enableSystem: null,
76
76
  prefersColorScheme: 0,
77
77
  htmlCarries: [],
78
+ page: [],
78
79
  },
79
80
  libraries: [],
80
81
  conflicts: [],
81
82
  };
82
83
  }
84
+ function addPagePaint(into, token, scheme, source) {
85
+ const found = into.theme.page.find((p) => p.token === token && p.scheme === scheme && p.source === source);
86
+ if (found)
87
+ found.count += 1;
88
+ else
89
+ into.theme.page.push({ token, scheme, source, count: 1 });
90
+ }
83
91
  const ANY_IMPORT = /(?:from\s+["']([^"'.][^"']*)["']|require\(\s*["']([^"'.][^"']*)["']\s*\))/g;
84
92
  /** The package a specifier belongs to: `@tiptap/react` and `motion/react` both keep the
85
93
  * part a manifest would name. */
@@ -110,6 +118,13 @@ export function readSignalsInto(into, imports, file, source) {
110
118
  const isStyle = /\.(css|scss|sass|less)$/i.test(file);
111
119
  if (isStyle) {
112
120
  into.theme.prefersColorScheme += (source.match(/prefers-color-scheme/g) ?? []).length;
121
+ /**
122
+ * `body { background: … }` in a global stylesheet is the page saying so itself -
123
+ * the strongest of the three page signals and the one a class sweep never finds.
124
+ */
125
+ for (const m of source.matchAll(/(?:^|\})\s*(?:html|body|:root)[^{]*\{[^}]*?background(?:-color)?\s*:\s*([^;}]+)/g)) {
126
+ addPagePaint(into, m[1].trim(), "light", "global-css");
127
+ }
113
128
  return;
114
129
  }
115
130
  if (!isCode)
@@ -152,6 +167,37 @@ export function readSignalsInto(into, imports, file, source) {
152
167
  }
153
168
  }
154
169
  }
170
+ /**
171
+ * THE PAGE PAINTS, from the markup. A `min-h-screen` container with a background is
172
+ * the page - that idiom is universal, which is what makes this generalize across
173
+ * folder layouts. `dark:bg-x` files under dark; `bg-x` under light.
174
+ */
175
+ for (const m of source.matchAll(/className=\{?["'`]([^"'`]+)["'`]/g)) {
176
+ const list = m[1].split(/\s+/);
177
+ const isViewport = list.some((c) => /^(?:min-h-screen|h-screen|min-h-dvh|h-dvh)$/.test(c));
178
+ if (isViewport) {
179
+ for (const c of list) {
180
+ const dark = /^dark:bg-([a-z][a-z0-9-]*)$/.exec(c);
181
+ const light = /^bg-([a-z][a-z0-9-]*)$/.exec(c);
182
+ if (dark)
183
+ addPagePaint(into, dark[1], "dark", "viewport-container");
184
+ else if (light &&
185
+ !/^(gradient|opacity|clip|cover|contain|center|fixed|local|scroll|none|auto|repeat|transparent|current|inherit)/.test(light[1])) {
186
+ addPagePaint(into, light[1], "light", "viewport-container");
187
+ }
188
+ }
189
+ }
190
+ }
191
+ for (const m of source.matchAll(/<(?:main|body)\b[^>]*className=\{?["'`]([^"'`]+)["'`]/g)) {
192
+ for (const c of m[1].split(/\s+/)) {
193
+ const dark = /^dark:bg-([a-z][a-z0-9-]*)$/.exec(c);
194
+ const light = /^bg-([a-z][a-z0-9-]*)$/.exec(c);
195
+ if (dark)
196
+ addPagePaint(into, dark[1], "dark", "main-or-body");
197
+ else if (light)
198
+ addPagePaint(into, light[1], "light", "main-or-body");
199
+ }
200
+ }
155
201
  ANY_IMPORT.lastIndex = 0;
156
202
  const seen = new Set();
157
203
  for (const m of source.matchAll(ANY_IMPORT)) {
@@ -267,6 +313,31 @@ export function describeSignals(s) {
267
313
  if (t.htmlCarries.length > 0) {
268
314
  out.push(`\`<html>\` carries ${t.htmlCarries.map((a) => `\`${a}\``).join(" ")} - which is the ancestor every dark rule of theirs matches, and therefore the one ours must match.`);
269
315
  }
316
+ /**
317
+ * The page, said as evidence with the SOURCE named - "2 full-viewport containers"
318
+ * is a claim somebody can weigh against "1 main". Strongest first per scheme.
319
+ */
320
+ const strength = {
321
+ "global-css": 3,
322
+ "main-or-body": 2,
323
+ "viewport-container": 1,
324
+ };
325
+ for (const scheme of ["dark", "light"]) {
326
+ const paints = t.page
327
+ .filter((p) => p.scheme === scheme)
328
+ .sort((a, b) => strength[b.source] - strength[a.source] || b.count - a.count);
329
+ if (paints.length === 0)
330
+ continue;
331
+ const label = {
332
+ "global-css": "body in global CSS",
333
+ "main-or-body": "on <main>/<body>",
334
+ "viewport-container": "full-viewport container",
335
+ };
336
+ out.push(`the ${scheme} page paints ${paints
337
+ .slice(0, 3)
338
+ .map((p) => `\`${p.token}\` (${p.count}x ${label[p.source]})`)
339
+ .join(", ")} - the canvas question, answered from the files rather than hunted.`);
340
+ }
270
341
  for (const family of ["primitives", "motion", "icons", "charts", "editors"]) {
271
342
  const found = s.libraries.filter((l) => l.family === family);
272
343
  if (found.length === 0)
@@ -190,8 +190,37 @@ const TYPE_KEYWORD = {
190
190
  underline: { property: "textDecoration", value: "underline" },
191
191
  };
192
192
  /** States we recognise. Anything else is skipped rather than invented. */
193
- const STATE = /^(hover|focus|focus-visible|active|disabled|checked)$/;
194
- const DATA_STATE = /^data-\[([a-z-]+)\]$/;
193
+ /**
194
+ * A MODIFIER'S STATE, IN THE CONTRACT'S SPELLING.
195
+ *
196
+ * The old regex KEYED the state with the raw modifier, so `focus-visible:ring-2` arrived
197
+ * as `states["focus-visible"]` - a key the compiler cannot spell and the lint rejects.
198
+ * A real import hit it on Modal's close button and had to hand-patch the census before
199
+ * sending (test13, 01/08). The reading edge normalizes; the contract stays canonical.
200
+ */
201
+ const STATE_SPELLING = {
202
+ hover: "hover",
203
+ focus: "focus",
204
+ "focus-visible": "focusVisible",
205
+ "focus-within": "focus",
206
+ active: "active",
207
+ disabled: "disabled",
208
+ checked: "checked",
209
+ selected: "selected",
210
+ open: "open",
211
+ invalid: "invalid",
212
+ loading: "loading",
213
+ "read-only": "readOnly",
214
+ required: "required",
215
+ placeholder: "placeholder",
216
+ highlighted: "highlighted",
217
+ even: "even",
218
+ odd: "odd",
219
+ first: "first",
220
+ last: "last",
221
+ empty: "empty",
222
+ };
223
+ const DATA_STATE = /^data-\[(?:state=)?([a-z-]+)\]$/;
195
224
  /**
196
225
  * Split a class into its modifiers and the utility itself.
197
226
  *
@@ -529,6 +558,26 @@ function tokenRefFor(name) {
529
558
  if (bare.startsWith("gradient-"))
530
559
  return `{gradients.${bare.slice(9)}}`;
531
560
  if (bare.startsWith("text-")) {
561
+ /**
562
+ * THE COMPANION TOKEN. Tailwind v4 spells "the line-height OF text-body-s" as
563
+ * `--text-body-s--line-height` - a double dash inside one name. Read as a step name
564
+ * it produced `{typography.scale.body-s--line-height.fontSize}`, whose double dash
565
+ * no ref grammar accepts, and the whole recipe was REFUSED at validation (test13,
566
+ * 01/08). The suffix names the property; the middle names the step.
567
+ */
568
+ const companion = /^text-(.+?)--(line-height|letter-spacing|font-weight)$/.exec(bare);
569
+ if (companion) {
570
+ const prop = {
571
+ "line-height": "lineHeight",
572
+ "letter-spacing": "letterSpacing",
573
+ "font-weight": "weight",
574
+ }[companion[2]];
575
+ return `{typography.scale.${companion[1]}.${prop}}`;
576
+ }
577
+ // Any other double dash is a name this grammar cannot hold - the literal var()
578
+ // still resolves against their own stylesheet, and an invalid ref helps nobody.
579
+ if (bare.slice(5).includes("--"))
580
+ return `var(${name})`;
532
581
  return `{typography.scale.${bare.slice(5)}.fontSize}`;
533
582
  }
534
583
  if (bare.startsWith("font-"))
@@ -712,9 +761,10 @@ export function transcribe(classes, declared) {
712
761
  target = isDark ? out.dark : out.base;
713
762
  }
714
763
  else if (rest.length === 1 && !isDark) {
715
- const state = STATE.test(rest[0])
764
+ const raw = STATE_SPELLING[rest[0]] != null
716
765
  ? rest[0]
717
766
  : (DATA_STATE.exec(rest[0])?.[1] ?? null);
767
+ const state = raw ? (STATE_SPELLING[raw] ?? null) : null;
718
768
  if (state)
719
769
  target = out.states[state] ?? (out.states[state] = {});
720
770
  else
@@ -761,6 +811,23 @@ export function transcribe(classes, declared) {
761
811
  // First write wins, matching how a class list resolves for the properties
762
812
  // we read: later duplicates in the same list are almost always a merge
763
813
  // artefact rather than an override.
814
+ /**
815
+ * `size-4` is Tailwind for width AND height; CSS has no `size` property for
816
+ * elements, so the platform dropped the declaration whole and a real import had to
817
+ * rewrite every one by hand as `w-N h-N` (test13, 01/08). One utility, two
818
+ * declarations, on whichever target the modifiers routed to.
819
+ */
820
+ if (decl.property === "size") {
821
+ if (target.width == null)
822
+ target.width = decl.value;
823
+ if (target.height == null)
824
+ target.height = decl.value;
825
+ if (decl.token)
826
+ out.fromToken += 1;
827
+ else
828
+ out.fromLiteral += 1;
829
+ continue;
830
+ }
764
831
  if (target[decl.property] != null)
765
832
  continue;
766
833
  target[decl.property] = decl.value;
@@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ const MODIFIER_STATE = {
49
49
  checked: "checked",
50
50
  indeterminate: "checked",
51
51
  selected: "selected",
52
+ highlighted: "highlighted",
52
53
  open: "open",
53
54
  invalid: "invalid",
54
55
  required: "required",
@@ -251,12 +251,29 @@ html carries lang="en" data-theme="dark" - which is the ancestor every dark rule
251
251
  That is a real run. Your job is to CONFIRM OR CORRECT it, not to reproduce it - and a sweep
252
252
  would bring back a different slice than the next one, which is the worse property of the two.
253
253
 
254
+ **Confirmation costs ZERO reads.** A real run spent 7 pattern searches and 39 file reads to
255
+ "confirm" a theme the census had already counted (test14, 01/08) - that is re-deriving, not
256
+ confirming. The rule: the census numbers are TRUE unless something you already read while
257
+ doing other work contradicts them. Only on a contradiction do you open a file, and only the
258
+ one file the evidence names. If nothing contradicts, write the census's answer down and move
259
+ on - it costs one sentence.
260
+
254
261
  \`has: ["dark"]\` on a dark-only product is the right answer. It is better than filling a light
255
262
  slot on their behalf, and it makes adding light a deliberate act they take later.
256
263
 
257
264
  **\`roles\` - which of their values carries which meaning**, when their token names do not say.
258
265
  A project naming its neutrals by temperature (\`--color-darkgray-900\`) has told you nothing
259
- about which one is the page. Read a screen and see.
266
+ about which one is the page - and the census now answers that too, under "the page paints":
267
+
268
+ \`\`\`
269
+ the dark page paints darkgray-500 (2x on <main>/<body>, 2x full-viewport container)
270
+ the light page paints #EDF3FA (1x body in global CSS), lightgray-200 (2x viewport)
271
+ \`\`\`
272
+
273
+ Three countable sources, strongest first: \`body { background }\` in global CSS, a background
274
+ on \`<main>\`/\`<body>\`, and a full-viewport container (\`min-h-screen\` + a background IS the
275
+ page). **Do not hunt for the canvas** - pick from this evidence, and name the source when you
276
+ report it. When the sources disagree, that disagreement is itself the finding to surface.
260
277
 
261
278
  **\`fonts\` and \`concept\`** - the voice, and one paragraph on what this product is. The concept
262
279
  feeds every recommendation downstream, so a real one beats a generic one by a wide margin.
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "synthesisui",
3
- "version": "0.16.88",
3
+ "version": "0.16.90",
4
4
  "description": "Bring SynthesisUI design systems into any project - tokens, typed components, whole pages and an agent-ready CLAUDE.md manifest.",
5
5
  "type": "module",
6
6
  "bin": {