switchboard-cli 0.1.0-alpha.1

package/calibration/ledger/runs/2026-04-09T10-02-57-143Z/traces/adv-a0c9e2bfb0d6.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,141 @@
+seed_id: adv-a0c9e2bfb0d6
+outcome: completed
+rejection_point: ""
+rejection_reason: ""
+complexity_score: 2
+selected_mode: minimal
+assumptions_count: 2
+routed_surface: claude-code-sdk
+routing_rationale: "Selected Claude Code (SDK) (score: 65). Fallback: Codex
+  (execution) (score: 25). Disqualified: openai-api (Needs execute, provider
+  offers compile.), chatgpt-auto (Needs execute, provider offers compile.),
+  internal-fallback (Needs execute, provider offers compile.)."
+return_mode: honest
+return_mode_sealed: true
+reconcile_findings_count: 3
+reconcile_drift_detected: true
+reconcile_recommendation: accept-with-warnings
+gates_triggered: []
+gate_label: accepted-with-cautions
+spread_score: 0.11249999999999999
+spread_vector:
+  claim_mismatch_ratio: 0.25
+  audit_burden: 0
+  residual_weight: 0
+  provenance_weakness: 0
+  gate_distance: 0.25
+  trace_failure_signal: 0
+  budget_correction_weight: 0
+trust_posture: cautioned
+receipt_verdict: accepted-with-cautions
+honesty_violations: []
+duration_ms: 3
+compiled_spec: >
+  # A notes app — just basic note taking, nothing fancy
+
+
+  ## What this product is
+
+
+  Build a notes app — just basic note taking, nothing fancy as a bounded V1
+  slice.
+
+
+  ## Who it is for
+
+
+  Solo builders shipping software.
+
+
+  ## The problem
+
+
+  A notes app — just basic note taking, nothing fancy
+
+
+  ## The proposed solution
+
+
+  Build a notes app — just basic note taking, nothing fancy as a bounded V1
+  slice. This is a bounded V1 slice focused on proving the core value
+  proposition with minimal surface area.
+
+
+  ## V1 promise
+
+
+  A working first slice of a notes app — just basic note taking, nothing fancy.
+
+
+  ## Scope in
+
+
+  - A notes app — just basic note taking, nothing fancy
+
+  - Keep the primary artifact aligned with the V1 promise.
+
+  - Touch only files necessary for the first build slice.
+
+
+  ## Scope out
+
+
+  - Not a generic chat wrapper
+
+
+  ## First build slice
+
+
+  A notes app — just basic note taking, nothing fancy
+
+
+  Systems expected: CLI, Node.js.
+
+
+  Constraints to respect:
+
+  - No additional constraints.
+
+
+  ## Acceptance criteria
+
+
+  - Seed is valid and the idea has been compiled into a governed contract.
+
+  - Primary artifact is execution-ready: the build slice works as described.
+
+  - Next surface is explicit with a return condition.
+
+  - Handoff is launchable as an SBX bundle.
+
+
+  ## Open questions
+
+
+  - None identified.
+
+
+  ## What must not change (intent anchors)
+
+
+  - Not a generic chat wrapper
+
+
+  These are non-negotiable boundaries. Any execution that touches these areas
+  must be flagged for review.
+
+
+  ## Key risks and unknowns
+
+
+  Confidence is low — significant unknowns remain.
+
+
+  - Is the scope narrow enough to deliver in a single bounded execution?
+
+  - Are there hidden dependencies that could expand the build slice?
+
+  - Return condition: all done_when criteria met or blocker encountered.
+receipt_summary: 'Completed: Build the first slice: A notes app — just basic
+  note taking, nothing fancy. All done_when criteria satisfied. Implementation
+  follows the project contract for "A notes app — just basic note '

package/calibration/ledger/runs/2026-04-09T10-02-57-143Z/traces/blind-3e892f3a89ee.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+seed_id: blind-3e892f3a89ee
+outcome: completed
+rejection_point: ""
+rejection_reason: ""
+complexity_score: 2
+selected_mode: minimal
+assumptions_count: 2
+routed_surface: claude-code-sdk
+routing_rationale: "Selected Claude Code (SDK) (score: 65). Fallback: Codex
+  (execution) (score: 25). Disqualified: openai-api (Needs execute, provider
+  offers compile.), chatgpt-auto (Needs execute, provider offers compile.),
+  internal-fallback (Needs execute, provider offers compile.)."
+return_mode: drift
+return_mode_sealed: true
+reconcile_findings_count: 4
+reconcile_drift_detected: true
+reconcile_recommendation: review-required
+gates_triggered: []
+gate_label: held-for-review
+spread_score: 0.195
+spread_vector:
+  claim_mismatch_ratio: 0.4
+  audit_burden: 0
+  residual_weight: 0
+  provenance_weakness: 0
+  gate_distance: 0.5
+  trace_failure_signal: 0
+  budget_correction_weight: 0
+trust_posture: held
+receipt_verdict: held-for-review
+honesty_violations: []
+duration_ms: 4
+compiled_spec: >
+  # A REST API that converts Markdown files to PDF, accepting a file upload and
+  returning the rendered document
+
+
+  ## What this product is
+
+
+  Build a rest api that converts markdown files to pdf, accepting a file upload
+  and returning the rendered document as a bounded V1 slice.
+
+
+  ## Who it is for
+
+
+  Solo builders shipping software.
+
+
+  ## The problem
+
+
+  A REST API that converts Markdown files to PDF, accepting a file upload and
+  returning the rendered document
+
+
+  ## The proposed solution
+
+
+  Build a rest api that converts markdown files to pdf, accepting a file upload
+  and returning the rendered document as a bounded V1 slice. This is a bounded
+  V1 slice focused on proving the core value proposition with minimal surface
+  area.
+
+
+  ## V1 promise
+
+
+  A working first slice of a rest api that converts markdown files to pdf,
+  accepting a file upload and returning the rendered document.
+
+
+  ## Scope in
+
+
+  - A REST API that converts Markdown files to PDF, accepting a file upload and
+  returning the rendered document
+
+  - Keep the primary artifact aligned with the V1 promise.
+
+  - Touch only files necessary for the first build slice.
+
+
+  ## Scope out
+
+
+  - Not a generic chat wrapper
+
+
+  ## First build slice
+
+
+  A REST API that converts Markdown files to PDF, accepting a file upload and
+  returning the rendered document
+
+
+  Systems expected: CLI, Node.js.
+
+
+  Constraints to respect:
+
+  - No additional constraints.
+
+
+  ## Acceptance criteria
+
+
+  - Seed is valid and the idea has been compiled into a governed contract.
+
+  - Primary artifact is execution-ready: the build slice works as described.
+
+  - Next surface is explicit with a return condition.
+
+  - Handoff is launchable as an SBX bundle.
+
+
+  ## Open questions
+
+
+  - None identified.
+
+
+  ## What must not change (intent anchors)
+
+
+  - Not a generic chat wrapper
+
+
+  These are non-negotiable boundaries. Any execution that touches these areas
+  must be flagged for review.
+
+
+  ## Key risks and unknowns
+
+
+  Confidence is medium — some assumptions remain unconfirmed.
+
+
+  - Is the scope narrow enough to deliver in a single bounded execution?
+
+  - Are there hidden dependencies that could expand the build slice?
+
+  - Return condition: all done_when criteria met or blocker encountered.
+receipt_summary: "Completed: Build the first slice: A REST API that converts
+  Markdown files to PDF, accepting a file upload and returning the rendered
+  document. All done_when criteria satisfied. Implementation follows "

package/calibration/ledger/runs/2026-04-09T10-02-57-143Z/traces/blind-958b2f9e6816.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+seed_id: blind-958b2f9e6816
+outcome: completed
+rejection_point: ""
+rejection_reason: ""
+complexity_score: 2
+selected_mode: minimal
+assumptions_count: 2
+routed_surface: claude-code-sdk
+routing_rationale: "Selected Claude Code (SDK) (score: 75). Fallback: Codex
+  (execution) (score: 25). Disqualified: openai-api (Needs execute, provider
+  offers compile.), chatgpt-auto (Needs execute, provider offers compile.),
+  internal-fallback (Needs execute, provider offers compile.)."
+return_mode: drift
+return_mode_sealed: true
+reconcile_findings_count: 5
+reconcile_drift_detected: true
+reconcile_recommendation: accept-with-warnings
+gates_triggered:
+  - trust-boundary-change
+gate_label: accepted-with-cautions
+spread_score: 0.1875
+spread_vector:
+  claim_mismatch_ratio: 0.5
+  audit_burden: 0
+  residual_weight: 0
+  provenance_weakness: 0
+  gate_distance: 0.25
+  trace_failure_signal: 0
+  budget_correction_weight: 0
+trust_posture: cautioned
+receipt_verdict: accepted-with-cautions
+honesty_violations: []
+duration_ms: 7
+compiled_spec: >
+  # A CLI tool that counts lines of code in a directory, outputting a summary
+  table by file extension
+
+
+  ## What this product is
+
+
+  Build a cli tool that counts lines of code in a directory, outputting a
+  summary table by file extension as a bounded V1 slice.
+
+
+  ## Who it is for
+
+
+  Solo builders shipping software.
+
+
+  ## The problem
+
+
+  A CLI tool that counts lines of code in a directory, outputting a summary
+  table by file extension
+
+
+  ## The proposed solution
+
+
+  Build a cli tool that counts lines of code in a directory, outputting a
+  summary table by file extension as a bounded V1 slice. This is a bounded V1
+  slice focused on proving the core value proposition with minimal surface area.
+
+
+  ## V1 promise
+
+
+  A working first slice of a cli tool that counts lines of code in a directory,
+  outputting a summary table by file extension.
+
+
+  ## Scope in
+
+
+  - A CLI tool that counts lines of code in a directory, outputting a summary
+  table by file extension
+
+  - Keep the primary artifact aligned with the V1 promise.
+
+  - Touch only files necessary for the first build slice.
+
+
+  ## Scope out
+
+
+  - Not a generic chat wrapper
+
+
+  ## First build slice
+
+
+  A CLI tool that counts lines of code in a directory, outputting a summary
+  table by file extension
+
+
+  Systems expected: CLI, Node.js.
+
+
+  Constraints to respect:
+
+  - No additional constraints.
+
+
+  ## Acceptance criteria
+
+
+  - Seed is valid and the idea has been compiled into a governed contract.
+
+  - Primary artifact is execution-ready: the build slice works as described.
+
+  - Next surface is explicit with a return condition.
+
+  - Handoff is launchable as an SBX bundle.
+
+
+  ## Open questions
+
+
+  - None identified.
+
+
+  ## What must not change (intent anchors)
+
+
+  - Not a generic chat wrapper
+
+
+  These are non-negotiable boundaries. Any execution that touches these areas
+  must be flagged for review.
+
+
+  ## Key risks and unknowns
+
+
+  Confidence is medium — some assumptions remain unconfirmed.
+
+
+  - Is the scope narrow enough to deliver in a single bounded execution?
+
+  - Are there hidden dependencies that could expand the build slice?
+
+  - Return condition: all done_when criteria met or blocker encountered.
+receipt_summary: "Completed: Build the first slice: A CLI tool that counts lines
+  of code in a directory, outputting a summary table by file extension. All
+  done_when criteria satisfied. Implementation follows the projec"

package/calibration/ledger/runs/2026-04-09T10-02-57-143Z/verdicts-a/adv-a0c9e2bfb0d6.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+seed_id: adv-a0c9e2bfb0d6
+verdict: pass
+trust_posture: cautioned
+gate_label: accepted-with-cautions
+spread_score: 0.11249999999999999
+reconcile_drift: true
+gates_triggered: []
+threshold_proximity:
+  spread_0.3:
+    threshold: 0.3
+    actual: 0.11249999999999999
+    margin: 0.1875
+  spread_0.5:
+    threshold: 0.5
+    actual: 0.11249999999999999
+    margin: 0.3875
+  spread_0.7:
+    threshold: 0.7
+    actual: 0.11249999999999999
+    margin: 0.5875
+justification: "Pipeline outcome: completed. Trust posture: cautioned. Spread
+  score: 0.112. Reconciliation detected drift. Reconcile findings: 3. Verdict:
+  pass."
+scored_at: 2026-04-09T10:02:57.169Z

package/calibration/ledger/runs/2026-04-09T10-02-57-143Z/verdicts-a/blind-3e892f3a89ee.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+seed_id: blind-3e892f3a89ee
+verdict: fail
+trust_posture: held
+gate_label: held-for-review
+spread_score: 0.195
+reconcile_drift: true
+gates_triggered: []
+threshold_proximity:
+  spread_0.3:
+    threshold: 0.3
+    actual: 0.195
+    margin: 0.105
+  spread_0.5:
+    threshold: 0.5
+    actual: 0.195
+    margin: 0.305
+  spread_0.7:
+    threshold: 0.7
+    actual: 0.195
+    margin: 0.505
+justification: "Pipeline outcome: completed. Trust posture: held. Spread score:
+  0.195. Reconciliation detected drift. Reconcile findings: 4. Verdict: fail."
+scored_at: 2026-04-09T10:02:57.163Z

package/calibration/ledger/runs/2026-04-09T10-02-57-143Z/verdicts-a/blind-958b2f9e6816.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+seed_id: blind-958b2f9e6816
+verdict: fail
+trust_posture: cautioned
+gate_label: accepted-with-cautions
+spread_score: 0.1875
+reconcile_drift: true
+gates_triggered:
+  - trust-boundary-change
+threshold_proximity:
+  spread_0.3:
+    threshold: 0.3
+    actual: 0.1875
+    margin: 0.1125
+  spread_0.5:
+    threshold: 0.5
+    actual: 0.1875
+    margin: 0.3125
+  spread_0.7:
+    threshold: 0.7
+    actual: 0.1875
+    margin: 0.5125
+justification: "Pipeline outcome: completed. Trust posture: cautioned. Spread
+  score: 0.188. Reconciliation detected drift. Gates triggered:
+  trust-boundary-change. Reconcile findings: 5. Verdict: fail."
+scored_at: 2026-04-09T10:02:57.155Z

package/calibration/ledger/runs/2026-04-09T10-02-57-143Z/verdicts-b/adv-a0c9e2bfb0d6.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+seed_id: adv-a0c9e2bfb0d6
+verdict: inconclusive
+dimensions:
+  intent_fidelity:
+    score: 0.071
+    justification: "Keyword overlap between seed and spec: 7.1% (Jaccard). Spec
+      introduces significant concepts beyond the seed (92 extra keywords out of
+      99)."
+  confidence_honesty:
+    score: 1
+    justification: Trust posture language is consistent with the evidence visible in
+      the receipt summary. No banned terms detected.
+  scope_discipline:
+    score: 0.6
+    justification: "Significant scope creep: 92 concepts in spec are not traceable
+      to the seed."
+  execution_readiness:
+    score: 0.45
+    justification: Spec lacks concrete indicators like file paths, commands, or
+      specific technical references. Output has structured format (steps, lists,
+      or headings).
+  self_awareness:
+    score: 0.8
+    justification: Output acknowledges multiple limitations or uncertainties
+      (unknown, risk, open question, constraint). This indicates honest
+      self-assessment.
+composite_score: 0.575
+justification: "Composite score 0.575 (threshold: pass >= 0.7, fail < 0.4).
+  Intent fidelity: 0.07, Confidence honesty: 1.00, Scope discipline: 0.60,
+  Execution readiness: 0.45, Self-awareness: 0.80."
+scored_at: 2026-04-09T10:02:57.170Z

package/calibration/ledger/runs/2026-04-09T10-02-57-143Z/verdicts-b/blind-3e892f3a89ee.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+seed_id: blind-3e892f3a89ee
+verdict: inconclusive
+dimensions:
+  intent_fidelity:
+    score: 0.115
+    justification: "Keyword overlap between seed and spec: 11.5% (Jaccard). Spec
+      introduces significant concepts beyond the seed (92 extra keywords out of
+      104)."
+  confidence_honesty:
+    score: 1
+    justification: Trust posture language is consistent with the evidence visible in
+      the receipt summary. No banned terms detected.
+  scope_discipline:
+    score: 0.6
+    justification: "Significant scope creep: 92 concepts in spec are not traceable
+      to the seed."
+  execution_readiness:
+    score: 0.45
+    justification: Spec lacks concrete indicators like file paths, commands, or
+      specific technical references. Output has structured format (steps, lists,
+      or headings).
+  self_awareness:
+    score: 0.65
+    justification: Output acknowledges multiple limitations or uncertainties
+      (unknown, assumption, risk, open question, constraint). This indicates
+      honest self-assessment. Receipt summary contains no caveats, warnings, or
+      notes, which is suspicious for any non-trivial output.
+composite_score: 0.564
+justification: "Composite score 0.564 (threshold: pass >= 0.7, fail < 0.4).
+  Intent fidelity: 0.12, Confidence honesty: 1.00, Scope discipline: 0.60,
+  Execution readiness: 0.45, Self-awareness: 0.65."
+scored_at: 2026-04-09T10:02:57.164Z

package/calibration/ledger/runs/2026-04-09T10-02-57-143Z/verdicts-b/blind-958b2f9e6816.yaml

@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+seed_id: blind-958b2f9e6816
+verdict: inconclusive
+dimensions:
+  intent_fidelity:
+    score: 0.107
+    justification: "Keyword overlap between seed and spec: 10.7% (Jaccard). Spec
+      introduces significant concepts beyond the seed (92 extra keywords out of
+      103)."
+  confidence_honesty:
+    score: 1
+    justification: Trust posture language is consistent with the evidence visible in
+      the receipt summary. No banned terms detected.
+  scope_discipline:
+    score: 0.6
+    justification: "Significant scope creep: 92 concepts in spec are not traceable
+      to the seed."
+  execution_readiness:
+    score: 0.45
+    justification: Spec lacks concrete indicators like file paths, commands, or
+      specific technical references. Output has structured format (steps, lists,
+      or headings).
+  self_awareness:
+    score: 0.65
+    justification: Output acknowledges multiple limitations or uncertainties
+      (unknown, assumption, risk, open question, constraint). This indicates
+      honest self-assessment. Receipt summary contains no caveats, warnings, or
+      notes, which is suspicious for any non-trivial output.
+composite_score: 0.562
+justification: "Composite score 0.562 (threshold: pass >= 0.7, fail < 0.4).
+  Intent fidelity: 0.11, Confidence honesty: 1.00, Scope discipline: 0.60,
+  Execution readiness: 0.45, Self-awareness: 0.65."
+scored_at: 2026-04-09T10:02:57.157Z