superpowers-mcp 5.1.2 → 6.0.1

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (38) hide show
  1. package/README.md +25 -14
  2. package/README.zh-TW.md +30 -14
  3. package/out/server.js +2 -2
  4. package/package.json +1 -1
  5. package/skills/brainstorming/SKILL.md +5 -10
  6. package/skills/brainstorming/scripts/frame-template.html +25 -26
  7. package/skills/brainstorming/scripts/helper.js +107 -35
  8. package/skills/brainstorming/scripts/server.cjs +377 -30
  9. package/skills/brainstorming/scripts/start-server.sh +70 -9
  10. package/skills/brainstorming/scripts/stop-server.sh +66 -2
  11. package/skills/brainstorming/spec-document-reviewer-prompt.md +1 -1
  12. package/skills/brainstorming/visual-companion.md +29 -25
  13. package/skills/dispatching-parallel-agents/SKILL.md +9 -6
  14. package/skills/executing-plans/SKILL.md +2 -2
  15. package/skills/finishing-a-development-branch/SKILL.md +2 -12
  16. package/skills/receiving-code-review/SKILL.md +2 -2
  17. package/skills/requesting-code-review/SKILL.md +2 -2
  18. package/skills/requesting-code-review/code-reviewer.md +15 -11
  19. package/skills/subagent-driven-development/SKILL.md +206 -67
  20. package/skills/subagent-driven-development/implementer-prompt.md +30 -4
  21. package/skills/subagent-driven-development/scripts/review-package +44 -0
  22. package/skills/subagent-driven-development/scripts/sdd-workspace +22 -0
  23. package/skills/subagent-driven-development/scripts/task-brief +40 -0
  24. package/skills/subagent-driven-development/task-reviewer-prompt.md +188 -0
  25. package/skills/systematic-debugging/SKILL.md +1 -1
  26. package/skills/test-driven-development/SKILL.md +2 -2
  27. package/skills/using-git-worktrees/SKILL.md +9 -22
  28. package/skills/using-superpowers/SKILL.md +17 -72
  29. package/skills/using-superpowers/references/antigravity-tools.md +23 -0
  30. package/skills/using-superpowers/references/codex-tools.md +1 -21
  31. package/skills/using-superpowers/references/pi-tools.md +16 -0
  32. package/skills/writing-plans/SKILL.md +22 -0
  33. package/skills/writing-plans/plan-document-reviewer-prompt.md +1 -1
  34. package/skills/writing-skills/SKILL.md +52 -18
  35. package/skills/writing-skills/anthropic-best-practices.md +91 -91
  36. package/skills/writing-skills/persuasion-principles.md +3 -3
  37. package/skills/subagent-driven-development/code-quality-reviewer-prompt.md +0 -25
  38. package/skills/subagent-driven-development/spec-reviewer-prompt.md +0 -61
package/skills/subagent-driven-development/spec-reviewer-prompt.md DELETED
@@ -1,61 +0,0 @@
1
- # Spec Compliance Reviewer Prompt Template
2
-
3
- Use this template when dispatching a spec compliance reviewer subagent.
4
-
5
- **Purpose:** Verify implementer built what was requested (nothing more, nothing less)
6
-
7
- ```
8
- Task tool (general-purpose):
9
- description: "Review spec compliance for Task N"
10
- prompt: |
11
- You are reviewing whether an implementation matches its specification.
12
-
13
- ## What Was Requested
14
-
15
- [FULL TEXT of task requirements]
16
-
17
- ## What Implementer Claims They Built
18
-
19
- [From implementer's report]
20
-
21
- ## CRITICAL: Do Not Trust the Report
22
-
23
- The implementer finished suspiciously quickly. Their report may be incomplete,
24
- inaccurate, or optimistic. You MUST verify everything independently.
25
-
26
- **DO NOT:**
27
- - Take their word for what they implemented
28
- - Trust their claims about completeness
29
- - Accept their interpretation of requirements
30
-
31
- **DO:**
32
- - Read the actual code they wrote
33
- - Compare actual implementation to requirements line by line
34
- - Check for missing pieces they claimed to implement
35
- - Look for extra features they didn't mention
36
-
37
- ## Your Job
38
-
39
- Read the implementation code and verify:
40
-
41
- **Missing requirements:**
42
- - Did they implement everything that was requested?
43
- - Are there requirements they skipped or missed?
44
- - Did they claim something works but didn't actually implement it?
45
-
46
- **Extra/unneeded work:**
47
- - Did they build things that weren't requested?
48
- - Did they over-engineer or add unnecessary features?
49
- - Did they add "nice to haves" that weren't in spec?
50
-
51
- **Misunderstandings:**
52
- - Did they interpret requirements differently than intended?
53
- - Did they solve the wrong problem?
54
- - Did they implement the right feature but wrong way?
55
-
56
- **Verify by reading code, not by trusting report.**
57
-
58
- Report:
59
- - ✅ Spec compliant (if everything matches after code inspection)
60
- - ❌ Issues found: [list specifically what's missing or extra, with file:line references]
61
- ```