superlab 0.1.70 → 0.1.72

package/package-assets/shared/lab/.managed/scripts/validate_section_draft.py

@@ -261,10 +261,102 @@ INTERNAL_CONFIG_LABEL_PATTERN = re.compile(
     r"\b[a-z]{1,4}\d+(?:[-_][a-z]?\d+(?:\.\d+)?){1,4}\b",
     flags=re.IGNORECASE,
 )
+ISOLATED_INSIGHT_HEADING_PATTERN = re.compile(
+    r"\\(?:sub)*section\*?\s*\{\s*(?:our\s+)?insights?\s*\}|"
+    r"\\(?:sub)*section\*?\s*\{\s*(?:核心)?洞见\s*\}",
+    flags=re.IGNORECASE,
+)
+
+
+def has_insight_contrast(text: str) -> bool:
+    return contains_any(
+        text,
+        (
+            "counterintuitively",
+            "we observe",
+            "we find",
+            "a closer inspection",
+            "while it might seem",
+            "existing work assumes",
+            "common assumption",
+            "suggesting that",
+            "reveals that",
+            "反直觉",
+            "我们观察到",
+            "我们发现",
+            "进一步检查",
+            "通常假设",
+            "常规认知",
+            "这表明",
+            "揭示",
+        ),
+    )
+
+
+def has_mechanism_explanation(text: str) -> bool:
+    return contains_any(
+        text,
+        (
+            "because",
+            "mechanism",
+            "attributed to",
+            "explains",
+            "to capture",
+            "to model",
+            "based on",
+            "therefore",
+            "causal",
+            "causes",
+            "amplifies",
+            "propagates",
+            "因为",
+            "机制",
+            "归因于",
+            "解释",
+            "为了刻画",
+            "为了建模",
+            "基于",
+            "因此",
+            "因果",
+            "放大",
+            "传播",
+        ),
+    )
+
+
+def has_diagnostic_interpretation(text: str) -> bool:
+    return contains_any(
+        text,
+        (
+            "supports our hypothesis",
+            "supports the hypothesis",
+            "diagnostic",
+            "mechanism",
+            "ablation shows",
+            "ablation indicates",
+            "this suggests",
+            "rather than",
+            "not merely",
+            "we attribute",
+            "验证了",
+            "支持假设",
+            "诊断",
+            "机制",
+            "消融表明",
+            "这表明",
+            "并非只是",
+            "不是单纯",
+            "归因于",
+        ),
+    )
 
 
 def check_common_section_gate_risks(text: str, issues: list[str]):
     prose_text = strip_latex_commands(text)
+    if ISOLATED_INSIGHT_HEADING_PATTERN.search(text):
+        issues.append(
+            "paper prose should not isolate insight under an 'Our Insights' style heading; weave the insight into the section's motivation, mechanism, evidence, and boundary"
+        )
     if contains_any(prose_text, SERVICE_STYLE_PHRASES):
         issues.append(
             "service-style or AI-assistant meta language appears in reader-facing prose; rewrite it as academic manuscript text"
@@ -530,6 +622,8 @@ def check_abstract(text: str, issues: list[str]):
         issues.append("abstract should state the core challenge or gap")
     if not contains_any(text, ("boundary", "bounded", "limitation", "however", "but", "局限", "边界", "限制")):
         issues.append("abstract should include a bounded result or explicit limitation")
+    if not (has_insight_contrast(text) or has_mechanism_explanation(text)):
+        issues.append("abstract should include a one-sentence insight or mechanism, not only task, method, and metric results")
 
 
 def check_introduction(text: str, issues: list[str]):
@@ -568,6 +662,10 @@ def check_introduction(text: str, issues: list[str]):
         ),
     ):
         issues.append("introduction should explain what is missing in prior work")
+    if not has_insight_contrast(text):
+        issues.append("introduction should create an insight contrast, such as common assumption versus observed mechanism")
+    if not has_mechanism_explanation(text):
+        issues.append("introduction should state the root mechanism or explanation behind the gap")
 
 
 def check_related_work(text: str, issues: list[str]):
@@ -592,6 +690,8 @@ def check_method(text: str, issues: list[str]):
         issues.append("method should explain the concrete design")
     if not contains_any(text, ("advantage", "benefit", "improves", "优势", "收益")):
         issues.append("method should explain the technical advantage")
+    if not has_mechanism_explanation(text):
+        issues.append("method should present design choices as consequences of the core insight or mechanism, not as an API-style module list")
 
 
 def check_experiments(text: str, issues: list[str]):
@@ -621,6 +721,8 @@ def check_experiments(text: str, issues: list[str]):
         ),
     ):
         issues.append("experiments should include benchmark scene notes")
+    if not has_diagnostic_interpretation(text):
+        issues.append("experiments should interpret results as diagnostic evidence for the paper's mechanism or insight, not only restate table values")
 
 
 def check_conclusion(text: str, issues: list[str]):
@@ -628,6 +730,23 @@ def check_conclusion(text: str, issues: list[str]):
         issues.append("conclusion should state at least one limitation or boundary")
     if not contains_any(text, ("future work", "next step", "future direction", "下一步", "未来工作")):
         issues.append("conclusion should state one next step or future direction")
+    if not contains_any(
+        text,
+        (
+            "broader principle",
+            "suggests",
+            "indicates",
+            "implies",
+            "takeaway",
+            "principle",
+            "更广泛",
+            "表明",
+            "意味着",
+            "启示",
+            "原则",
+        ),
+    ):
+        issues.append("conclusion should state the broader principle or takeaway implied by the evidence")
 
 
 SECTION_CHECKS = {