super-ux 0.52.3 → 0.52.5
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/CHANGELOG.md +43 -0
- package/package.json +1 -1
package/CHANGELOG.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,5 +1,48 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
## 0.52.5 — the card the umbrella renders, and the half of the role that was copywriting's
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
The committed social preview is now the umbrella's own render, byte for byte
|
|
4
|
+
(`node test/site_test.js` → `PASS: site — 42 checks`). Nothing about this pack changed;
|
|
5
|
+
the string it is rendered from did.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
**`super-ux`'s role cell said *"what the interface must do and how it sounds"*** in the
|
|
8
|
+
routing map — the block's first content and its highest-salience surface — while the
|
|
9
|
+
precedence table 362 lines below gave *"how it sounds"* to `copywriting`, and this pack's
|
|
10
|
+
own router text says the same split. A reader who stopped at the first table routed copy
|
|
11
|
+
work to `/ux`, on the one router pair the block works hardest elsewhere to separate. The
|
|
12
|
+
cell is now *"what the interface must do"*, which is exactly what the precedence table
|
|
13
|
+
already said.
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
The umbrella carries the fixture that keeps it: no member's role may contain another
|
|
16
|
+
router's answer, with one declared exemption. Watched refusing the old string —
|
|
17
|
+
`super-ux's role answers copywriting's question: "how it sounds"`.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
Board: `B-131`.
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
1
21
|
# Changelog
|
|
2
22
|
|
|
23
|
+
## 0.52.4 — the registry card stopped being four releases stale
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
`SKILL-CARD.md` carries the fields Anthropic's Skills-for-enterprise guidance asks every
|
|
26
|
+
organisation to keep — *"written so somebody who did not build this can decide"*. It said
|
|
27
|
+
`0.48.3` while this package shipped `0.52.3`.
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
**Nothing read it, so it could only drift.** The version moves in `package.json`,
|
|
30
|
+
`plugin.json` and `marketplace.json` on every release; the card was in no list. Measured
|
|
31
|
+
2026-09-01 across the family: **four of nine cards were behind** — this one by four minor
|
|
32
|
+
releases, `agent-stack` by ten.
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
The check refuses a card whose `Version` row disagrees with `package.json`, and refuses a
|
|
35
|
+
card that states no version at all: one a reader cannot see go stale is worse than one
|
|
36
|
+
that lags visibly. Watched failing before it shipped. `repo validator checks`
|
|
37
|
+
4617 → **4619**, recomputed by the command the fact itself cites rather than by hand.
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
**And the same defect as the sibling, in the same kind of place.** `test/validate.py`
|
|
40
|
+
carried an invalid escape sequence — a lone backslash-pipe in a non-raw docstring — which
|
|
41
|
+
Python already warns about and future versions will reject. It sat in a paragraph
|
|
42
|
+
explaining that *"the escape-awareness is the whole check"*. Now raw, zero escape
|
|
43
|
+
warnings — as `agent-stack`'s was an hour earlier, from a paragraph explaining how to
|
|
44
|
+
escape a pipe.
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
3
46
|
## 0.52.3 — the front matter gets read by a parser, not by a regex
|
|
4
47
|
|
|
5
48
|
- **`validate_front_matter_is_yaml` parses all 30 shipped front-matter blocks with PyYAML**
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
{
|
|
2
2
|
"name": "super-ux",
|
|
3
|
-
"version": "0.52.
|
|
3
|
+
"version": "0.52.5",
|
|
4
4
|
"scripts": {
|
|
5
5
|
"test": "python3 test/validate.py && python3 test/brand_lint_test.py && python3 test/ux_lint_test.py && python3 docs/ux/lint.py && python3 docs/brand/lint.py && node test/installer_test.js"
|
|
6
6
|
},
|