sumulige-claude 1.5.1 → 1.6.0

package/development/knowledge-base/test-best-practices.md

@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
-# Best Practices for API Design
-
-## Introduction
-This document covers API design best practices for building scalable web services.
-
-## Core Principles
-
-1. **Consistency**: Use consistent naming conventions
-2. **Versioning**: Always version your APIs
-3. **Error Handling**: Return meaningful error messages
-
-## RESTful Guidelines
-
-- Use HTTP verbs correctly (GET, POST, PUT, DELETE)
-- Design resource-oriented URLs
-- Implement proper status codes
-
-## Authentication
-
-Consider using JWT tokens for stateless authentication.
-
-
-
-## Security Best Practices
-
-- Always use HTTPS
-- Implement rate limiting
-- Validate input data
-

package/development/projects/proj_mkh1pazz_ixmt1/phase1/feasibility-report.md

@@ -1,160 +0,0 @@
-# Feasibility Analysis Report
-
-**Project**: proj_mkh1pazz_ixmt1
-**Date**: 1/16/2026 11:40:42 PM
-**Phase**: 1 - Research
-**Status**: 🚧 In Progress
-
----
-
-## Executive Summary
-
-> Brief overview of the project and feasibility assessment
-
----
-
-## Requirements Summary
-
-### Problem Statement
-[What problem are we solving?]
-
-### Target Users
-[Who will use this? What are their pain points?]
-
-### Key Features
-1. [Feature 1]
-2. [Feature 2]
-3. [Feature 3]
-
-### Constraints
-- [Constraint 1]
-- [Constraint 2]
-
-### Assumptions
-- [Assumption 1]
-- [Assumption 2]
-
----
-
-## Original Idea
-
-Build a simple REST API for task management with TypeScript
-
-
-
----
-
-## Correlation Analysis (Connect The Dots)
-
-### Related Projects
-| Project | Similarity | Reusable Components |
-|---------|------------|---------------------|
-| [Project A] | 85% | [Component list] |
-| [Project B] | 60% | [Component list] |
-
-### Overlapping Technology
-- [Tech stack overlap]
-- [Shared libraries]
-- [Common patterns]
-
-### Lessons from History
-- [Lesson 1]: [Context and outcome]
-- [Lesson 2]: [Context and outcome]
-
----
-
-## Industry Best Practices
-
-### Architecture
-**Practice**: [Specific practice]
-**Rationale**: [Why this is recommended]
-**Sources**: [Citations]
-
-### Security
-**Practice**: [Security best practice]
-**Rationale**: [Why this matters]
-
----
-
-## Feasibility Assessment
-
-### Technical Feasibility: ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3/5)
-
-**Strengths**:
-- [Strength 1]
-- [Strength 2]
-
-**Challenges**:
-- [Challenge 1]: [Mitigation strategy]
-
-### Time Estimate: X hours
-
-**Breakdown**:
-- Research & Planning: Xh
-- Design: Xh
-- Implementation: Xh
-- Testing: Xh
-
-**Total**: X hours
-
-### Complexity: Medium
-
-**Reasoning**: [Explain complexity assessment]
-
-### Risk Assessment
-
-| Risk | Severity | Probability | Mitigation |
-|------|----------|-------------|------------|
-| [Risk 1] | High | Medium | [Mitigation strategy] |
-| [Risk 2] | Medium | Low | [Mitigation strategy] |
-
----
-
-## Recommendations
-
-### Recommended Tech Stack
-
-**Frontend**:
-- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
-
-**Backend**:
-- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
-
-### Suggested Architecture
-
-[High-level architecture description]
-
-### Potential Issues to Watch
-
-1. **[Issue 1]**: [Monitoring approach]
-2. **[Issue 2]**: [Monitoring approach]
-
-### Next Steps (Phase 2: Approval)
-
-1. [ ] Review this report and ensure all sections are complete
-2. [ ] Run quality gate: `smc workflow validate /Users/sumulige/Documents/Antigravity/sumulige-claude/development/projects/proj_mkh1pazz_ixmt1/phase1/feasibility-report.md`
-3. [ ] Address any blockers identified
-4. [ ] Proceed to Phase 2 for Claude review and consensus
-
----
-
-## Quality Checklist
-
-- [x] Requirement summary is clear and complete
-- [ ] Correlation analysis found related work/patterns
-- [ ] Best practices are cited with sources
-- [ ] Feasibility has concrete ratings (not vague)
-- [ ] Time estimate is justified
-- [ ] Risks have mitigation strategies
-- [ ] Recommendations are actionable
-
----
-
-## Metadata
-
-- **Generated**: 1/16/2026 11:40:42 PM
-- **Confidence Level**: [To be filled by AI]
-
----
-
-*This report was generated by the Phase 1 Research Executor.*

package/development/projects/proj_mkh4jvnb_z7rwf/phase1/feasibility-report.md

@@ -1,160 +0,0 @@
-# Feasibility Analysis Report
-
-**Project**: proj_mkh4jvnb_z7rwf
-**Date**: 1/17/2026 1:00:27 AM
-**Phase**: 1 - Research
-**Status**: 🚧 In Progress
-
----
-
-## Executive Summary
-
-> Brief overview of the project and feasibility assessment
-
----
-
-## Requirements Summary
-
-### Problem Statement
-[What problem are we solving?]
-
-### Target Users
-[Who will use this? What are their pain points?]
-
-### Key Features
-1. [Feature 1]
-2. [Feature 2]
-3. [Feature 3]
-
-### Constraints
-- [Constraint 1]
-- [Constraint 2]
-
-### Assumptions
-- [Assumption 1]
-- [Assumption 2]
-
----
-
-## Original Idea
-
-构建一个简单的个人博客系统，支持Markdown文章发布 --id test-project-1768582827
-
-
-
----
-
-## Correlation Analysis (Connect The Dots)
-
-### Related Projects
-| Project | Similarity | Reusable Components |
-|---------|------------|---------------------|
-| [Project A] | 85% | [Component list] |
-| [Project B] | 60% | [Component list] |
-
-### Overlapping Technology
-- [Tech stack overlap]
-- [Shared libraries]
-- [Common patterns]
-
-### Lessons from History
-- [Lesson 1]: [Context and outcome]
-- [Lesson 2]: [Context and outcome]
-
----
-
-## Industry Best Practices
-
-### Architecture
-**Practice**: [Specific practice]
-**Rationale**: [Why this is recommended]
-**Sources**: [Citations]
-
-### Security
-**Practice**: [Security best practice]
-**Rationale**: [Why this matters]
-
----
-
-## Feasibility Assessment
-
-### Technical Feasibility: ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3/5)
-
-**Strengths**:
-- [Strength 1]
-- [Strength 2]
-
-**Challenges**:
-- [Challenge 1]: [Mitigation strategy]
-
-### Time Estimate: X hours
-
-**Breakdown**:
-- Research & Planning: Xh
-- Design: Xh
-- Implementation: Xh
-- Testing: Xh
-
-**Total**: X hours
-
-### Complexity: Medium
-
-**Reasoning**: [Explain complexity assessment]
-
-### Risk Assessment
-
-| Risk | Severity | Probability | Mitigation |
-|------|----------|-------------|------------|
-| [Risk 1] | High | Medium | [Mitigation strategy] |
-| [Risk 2] | Medium | Low | [Mitigation strategy] |
-
----
-
-## Recommendations
-
-### Recommended Tech Stack
-
-**Frontend**:
-- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
-
-**Backend**:
-- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
-
-### Suggested Architecture
-
-[High-level architecture description]
-
-### Potential Issues to Watch
-
-1. **[Issue 1]**: [Monitoring approach]
-2. **[Issue 2]**: [Monitoring approach]
-
-### Next Steps (Phase 2: Approval)
-
-1. [ ] Review this report and ensure all sections are complete
-2. [ ] Run quality gate: `smc workflow validate /Users/sumulige/Documents/Antigravity/sumulige-claude/development/projects/proj_mkh4jvnb_z7rwf/phase1/feasibility-report.md`
-3. [ ] Address any blockers identified
-4. [ ] Proceed to Phase 2 for Claude review and consensus
-
----
-
-## Quality Checklist
-
-- [x] Requirement summary is clear and complete
-- [ ] Correlation analysis found related work/patterns
-- [ ] Best practices are cited with sources
-- [ ] Feasibility has concrete ratings (not vague)
-- [ ] Time estimate is justified
-- [ ] Risks have mitigation strategies
-- [ ] Recommendations are actionable
-
----
-
-## Metadata
-
-- **Generated**: 1/17/2026 1:00:27 AM
-- **Confidence Level**: [To be filled by AI]
-
----
-
-*This report was generated by the Phase 1 Research Executor.*

package/development/projects/proj_mkh4jxkd_ewz5a/phase1/feasibility-report.md

@@ -1,160 +0,0 @@
-# Feasibility Analysis Report
-
-**Project**: proj_mkh4jxkd_ewz5a
-**Date**: 1/17/2026 1:00:30 AM
-**Phase**: 1 - Research
-**Status**: 🚧 In Progress
-
----
-
-## Executive Summary
-
-> Brief overview of the project and feasibility assessment
-
----
-
-## Requirements Summary
-
-### Problem Statement
-[What problem are we solving?]
-
-### Target Users
-[Who will use this? What are their pain points?]
-
-### Key Features
-1. [Feature 1]
-2. [Feature 2]
-3. [Feature 3]
-
-### Constraints
-- [Constraint 1]
-- [Constraint 2]
-
-### Assumptions
-- [Assumption 1]
-- [Assumption 2]
-
----
-
-## Original Idea
-
-构建一个简单的个人博客系统，支持Markdown文章发布 --id test-project-1768582830
-
-
-
----
-
-## Correlation Analysis (Connect The Dots)
-
-### Related Projects
-| Project | Similarity | Reusable Components |
-|---------|------------|---------------------|
-| [Project A] | 85% | [Component list] |
-| [Project B] | 60% | [Component list] |
-
-### Overlapping Technology
-- [Tech stack overlap]
-- [Shared libraries]
-- [Common patterns]
-
-### Lessons from History
-- [Lesson 1]: [Context and outcome]
-- [Lesson 2]: [Context and outcome]
-
----
-
-## Industry Best Practices
-
-### Architecture
-**Practice**: [Specific practice]
-**Rationale**: [Why this is recommended]
-**Sources**: [Citations]
-
-### Security
-**Practice**: [Security best practice]
-**Rationale**: [Why this matters]
-
----
-
-## Feasibility Assessment
-
-### Technical Feasibility: ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3/5)
-
-**Strengths**:
-- [Strength 1]
-- [Strength 2]
-
-**Challenges**:
-- [Challenge 1]: [Mitigation strategy]
-
-### Time Estimate: X hours
-
-**Breakdown**:
-- Research & Planning: Xh
-- Design: Xh
-- Implementation: Xh
-- Testing: Xh
-
-**Total**: X hours
-
-### Complexity: Medium
-
-**Reasoning**: [Explain complexity assessment]
-
-### Risk Assessment
-
-| Risk | Severity | Probability | Mitigation |
-|------|----------|-------------|------------|
-| [Risk 1] | High | Medium | [Mitigation strategy] |
-| [Risk 2] | Medium | Low | [Mitigation strategy] |
-
----
-
-## Recommendations
-
-### Recommended Tech Stack
-
-**Frontend**:
-- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
-
-**Backend**:
-- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
-
-### Suggested Architecture
-
-[High-level architecture description]
-
-### Potential Issues to Watch
-
-1. **[Issue 1]**: [Monitoring approach]
-2. **[Issue 2]**: [Monitoring approach]
-
-### Next Steps (Phase 2: Approval)
-
-1. [ ] Review this report and ensure all sections are complete
-2. [ ] Run quality gate: `smc workflow validate /Users/sumulige/Documents/Antigravity/sumulige-claude/development/projects/proj_mkh4jxkd_ewz5a/phase1/feasibility-report.md`
-3. [ ] Address any blockers identified
-4. [ ] Proceed to Phase 2 for Claude review and consensus
-
----
-
-## Quality Checklist
-
-- [x] Requirement summary is clear and complete
-- [ ] Correlation analysis found related work/patterns
-- [ ] Best practices are cited with sources
-- [ ] Feasibility has concrete ratings (not vague)
-- [ ] Time estimate is justified
-- [ ] Risks have mitigation strategies
-- [ ] Recommendations are actionable
-
----
-
-## Metadata
-
-- **Generated**: 1/17/2026 1:00:30 AM
-- **Confidence Level**: [To be filled by AI]
-
----
-
-*This report was generated by the Phase 1 Research Executor.*

package/development/projects/proj_mkh4k84n_ni73k/phase1/feasibility-report.md

@@ -1,160 +0,0 @@
-# Feasibility Analysis Report
-
-**Project**: proj_mkh4k84n_ni73k
-**Date**: 1/17/2026 1:00:43 AM
-**Phase**: 1 - Research
-**Status**: 🚧 In Progress
-
----
-
-## Executive Summary
-
-> Brief overview of the project and feasibility assessment
-
----
-
-## Requirements Summary
-
-### Problem Statement
-[What problem are we solving?]
-
-### Target Users
-[Who will use this? What are their pain points?]
-
-### Key Features
-1. [Feature 1]
-2. [Feature 2]
-3. [Feature 3]
-
-### Constraints
-- [Constraint 1]
-- [Constraint 2]
-
-### Assumptions
-- [Assumption 1]
-- [Assumption 2]
-
----
-
-## Original Idea
-
-构建一个简单的博客系统 --id test-e2e-1768582843
-
-
-
----
-
-## Correlation Analysis (Connect The Dots)
-
-### Related Projects
-| Project | Similarity | Reusable Components |
-|---------|------------|---------------------|
-| [Project A] | 85% | [Component list] |
-| [Project B] | 60% | [Component list] |
-
-### Overlapping Technology
-- [Tech stack overlap]
-- [Shared libraries]
-- [Common patterns]
-
-### Lessons from History
-- [Lesson 1]: [Context and outcome]
-- [Lesson 2]: [Context and outcome]
-
----
-
-## Industry Best Practices
-
-### Architecture
-**Practice**: [Specific practice]
-**Rationale**: [Why this is recommended]
-**Sources**: [Citations]
-
-### Security
-**Practice**: [Security best practice]
-**Rationale**: [Why this matters]
-
----
-
-## Feasibility Assessment
-
-### Technical Feasibility: ⭐⭐⭐☆☆ (3/5)
-
-**Strengths**:
-- [Strength 1]
-- [Strength 2]
-
-**Challenges**:
-- [Challenge 1]: [Mitigation strategy]
-
-### Time Estimate: X hours
-
-**Breakdown**:
-- Research & Planning: Xh
-- Design: Xh
-- Implementation: Xh
-- Testing: Xh
-
-**Total**: X hours
-
-### Complexity: Medium
-
-**Reasoning**: [Explain complexity assessment]
-
-### Risk Assessment
-
-| Risk | Severity | Probability | Mitigation |
-|------|----------|-------------|------------|
-| [Risk 1] | High | Medium | [Mitigation strategy] |
-| [Risk 2] | Medium | Low | [Mitigation strategy] |
-
----
-
-## Recommendations
-
-### Recommended Tech Stack
-
-**Frontend**:
-- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
-
-**Backend**:
-- [Choice 1] - [Rationale]
-
-### Suggested Architecture
-
-[High-level architecture description]
-
-### Potential Issues to Watch
-
-1. **[Issue 1]**: [Monitoring approach]
-2. **[Issue 2]**: [Monitoring approach]
-
-### Next Steps (Phase 2: Approval)
-
-1. [ ] Review this report and ensure all sections are complete
-2. [ ] Run quality gate: `smc workflow validate /Users/sumulige/Documents/Antigravity/sumulige-claude/development/projects/proj_mkh4k84n_ni73k/phase1/feasibility-report.md`
-3. [ ] Address any blockers identified
-4. [ ] Proceed to Phase 2 for Claude review and consensus
-
----
-
-## Quality Checklist
-
-- [x] Requirement summary is clear and complete
-- [ ] Correlation analysis found related work/patterns
-- [ ] Best practices are cited with sources
-- [ ] Feasibility has concrete ratings (not vague)
-- [ ] Time estimate is justified
-- [ ] Risks have mitigation strategies
-- [ ] Recommendations are actionable
-
----
-
-## Metadata
-
-- **Generated**: 1/17/2026 1:00:43 AM
-- **Confidence Level**: [To be filled by AI]
-
----
-
-*This report was generated by the Phase 1 Research Executor.*