stagent 0.6.3 → 0.7.0

package/src/lib/data/seed-data/learned-context.ts

@@ -19,74 +19,153 @@ export function createLearnedContext(
   const DAY = 86_400_000;
   const HOUR = 3_600_000;
 
-  const sourceTask1 = completedTaskIds[0] ?? null;
-  const sourceTask2 = completedTaskIds[1] ?? null;
+  const sourceTask2 = completedTaskIds[1] ?? null; // Copy variants (P1)
+  const sourceTask4 = completedTaskIds[3] ?? null; // Article (P2)
+  const sourceTask6 = completedTaskIds[5] ?? null; // Churn analysis (P3)
 
   return [
-    // General profile: proposal → approved lifecycle
+    // GTM profile: proposal → approved (benefit-led headlines)
     {
       id: crypto.randomUUID(),
-      profileId: "general",
+      profileId: "stagent-sample-gtm-launch-strategist",
       version: 1,
       content: null,
       diff: null,
       changeType: "proposal",
-      sourceTaskId: sourceTask1,
+      sourceTaskId: sourceTask2,
       proposalNotificationId: null,
       proposedAdditions:
-        "User prefers concise bullet-point summaries over paragraph-style output. When multiple options exist, present a ranked list with trade-offs rather than a single recommendation.",
+        "User prefers benefit-led headlines over feature-led ones. When writing marketing copy, prioritize pain/outcome framing over feature announcements. Use social proof as supporting evidence, not the lead.",
       approvedBy: null,
-      createdAt: new Date(now - 5 * DAY),
+      createdAt: new Date(now - 14 * DAY),
     },
     {
       id: crypto.randomUUID(),
-      profileId: "general",
+      profileId: "stagent-sample-gtm-launch-strategist",
       version: 2,
       content:
-        "User prefers concise bullet-point summaries over paragraph-style output. When multiple options exist, present a ranked list with trade-offs rather than a single recommendation.",
-      diff: "+ User prefers concise bullet-point summaries over paragraph-style output.\n+ When multiple options exist, present a ranked list with trade-offs rather than a single recommendation.",
+        "User prefers benefit-led headlines over feature-led ones. When writing marketing copy, prioritize pain/outcome framing over feature announcements. Use social proof as supporting evidence, not the lead.",
+      diff: "+ Benefit-led headlines preferred over feature-led.\n+ Pain/outcome framing > feature announcements.\n+ Social proof as support, not lead.",
       changeType: "approved",
-      sourceTaskId: sourceTask1,
+      sourceTaskId: sourceTask2,
       proposalNotificationId: null,
       proposedAdditions: null,
       approvedBy: "user",
-      createdAt: new Date(now - 5 * DAY + 2 * HOUR),
+      createdAt: new Date(now - 14 * DAY + 2 * HOUR),
     },
-    // Researcher profile: proposal → rejected
+
+    // Content profile: proposal → approved (article length)
     {
       id: crypto.randomUUID(),
-      profileId: "researcher",
+      profileId: "stagent-sample-content-production-editor",
       version: 1,
       content: null,
       diff: null,
       changeType: "proposal",
-      sourceTaskId: sourceTask2,
+      sourceTaskId: sourceTask4,
       proposalNotificationId: null,
       proposedAdditions:
-        "Always include academic citation format (APA) for sources. Limit research scope to peer-reviewed journals only.",
+        "Target 1,500-2,000 words for SEO articles. Shorter pieces don't rank for competitive keywords; longer ones have lower completion rates. Aim for Flesch-Kincaid score under 45.",
+      approvedBy: null,
+      createdAt: new Date(now - 10 * DAY),
+    },
+    {
+      id: crypto.randomUUID(),
+      profileId: "stagent-sample-content-production-editor",
+      version: 2,
+      content:
+        "Target 1,500-2,000 words for SEO articles. Shorter pieces don't rank for competitive keywords; longer ones have lower completion rates. Aim for Flesch-Kincaid score under 45.",
+      diff: "+ Target 1,500-2,000 words for SEO articles.\n+ FK score target: under 45.",
+      changeType: "approved",
+      sourceTaskId: sourceTask4,
+      proposalNotificationId: null,
+      proposedAdditions: null,
+      approvedBy: "user",
+      createdAt: new Date(now - 10 * DAY + 1 * HOUR),
+    },
+
+    // RevOps profile: proposal (deal stall threshold — pending)
+    {
+      id: crypto.randomUUID(),
+      profileId: "stagent-sample-revenue-ops-analyst",
+      version: 1,
+      content: null,
+      diff: null,
+      changeType: "proposal",
+      sourceTaskId: completedTaskIds[8] ?? null, // Pipeline snapshot (P7)
+      proposalNotificationId: null,
+      proposedAdditions:
+        "Deal stall threshold is 5 business days without activity. Flag deals exceeding this in every pipeline review. Coaching notes should include specific unblocking actions, not just the stall observation.",
       approvedBy: null,
       createdAt: new Date(now - 3 * DAY),
     },
+
+    // CS profile: proposal → approved (NPS threshold)
+    {
+      id: crypto.randomUUID(),
+      profileId: "stagent-sample-customer-success-analyst",
+      version: 1,
+      content: null,
+      diff: null,
+      changeType: "proposal",
+      sourceTaskId: sourceTask6,
+      proposalNotificationId: null,
+      proposedAdditions:
+        "NPS below 30 triggers immediate CSM outreach. Accounts without a workflow by Day 7 are at 82% churn risk — trigger proactive intervention at Day 5.",
+      approvedBy: null,
+      createdAt: new Date(now - 9 * DAY),
+    },
     {
       id: crypto.randomUUID(),
-      profileId: "researcher",
+      profileId: "stagent-sample-customer-success-analyst",
+      version: 2,
+      content:
+        "NPS below 30 triggers immediate CSM outreach. Accounts without a workflow by Day 7 are at 82% churn risk — trigger proactive intervention at Day 5.",
+      diff: "+ NPS < 30 → immediate CSM outreach.\n+ No workflow by Day 7 → 82% churn risk.\n+ Proactive intervention at Day 5.",
+      changeType: "approved",
+      sourceTaskId: sourceTask6,
+      proposalNotificationId: null,
+      proposedAdditions: null,
+      approvedBy: "user",
+      createdAt: new Date(now - 9 * DAY + 1 * HOUR),
+    },
+
+    // Due Diligence profile: proposal → rejected (too broad)
+    {
+      id: crypto.randomUUID(),
+      profileId: "stagent-sample-due-diligence-analyst",
+      version: 1,
+      content: null,
+      diff: null,
+      changeType: "proposal",
+      sourceTaskId: completedTaskIds[6] ?? null,
+      proposalNotificationId: null,
+      proposedAdditions:
+        "Always include competitor comparison in every analysis, regardless of scope. Default to 5 competitors minimum.",
+      approvedBy: null,
+      createdAt: new Date(now - 5 * DAY),
+    },
+    {
+      id: crypto.randomUUID(),
+      profileId: "stagent-sample-due-diligence-analyst",
       version: 2,
       content: null,
       diff: null,
       changeType: "rejected",
-      sourceTaskId: sourceTask2,
+      sourceTaskId: completedTaskIds[6] ?? null,
       proposalNotificationId: null,
       proposedAdditions: null,
       approvedBy: null,
-      createdAt: new Date(now - 3 * DAY + 1 * HOUR),
+      createdAt: new Date(now - 5 * DAY + 30 * 60_000),
     },
-    // General profile: second proposal (summarization)
+
+    // General profile: summarization
     {
       id: crypto.randomUUID(),
       profileId: "general",
-      version: 3,
+      version: 1,
       content:
-        "User prefers concise bullet-point summaries over paragraph-style output. When multiple options exist, present a ranked list with trade-offs rather than a single recommendation.",
+        "User prefers concise bullet-point summaries. When presenting options, use a ranked list with trade-offs. For reports, lead with the executive summary and recommendation before details.",
       diff: null,
       changeType: "summarization",
       sourceTaskId: null,