spirewise 1.1.0 → 1.6.2
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/README.md +17 -0
- package/bin/cli.js +57 -15
- package/install.sh +34 -8
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/skills/README.md +15 -0
- package/skills/f6s-copywriting/README.md +53 -0
- package/skills/linkedin-copywriting/README.md +49 -0
- package/skills/nvidia-inception-idea-booster/README.md +55 -0
- package/skills/nvidia-inception-idea-booster/SKILL.md +151 -0
- package/skills/nvidia-inception-starter/README.md +61 -0
- package/skills/nvidia-inception-starter/SKILL.md +179 -0
- package/skills/nvidia-product-inventor/README.md +70 -0
- package/skills/nvidia-product-inventor/SKILL.md +205 -0
package/README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -81,12 +81,29 @@ npx spirewise agents # supported agents + their folders
|
|
|
81
81
|
npx spirewise --help # all options
|
|
82
82
|
```
|
|
83
83
|
|
|
84
|
+
## Uninstall
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
`remove` (alias `uninstall`) mirrors install — same interactive picker, same
|
|
87
|
+
flags — and deletes the skills cleanly from workspace, global, or both:
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
```bash
|
|
90
|
+
npx spirewise remove # interactive picker
|
|
91
|
+
npx spirewise remove -sc both # pick skills+agents, both
|
|
92
|
+
npx spirewise remove -s f6s-copywriting -a cursor -sc workspace
|
|
93
|
+
```
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
Skill folders and generated rule files are deleted; now-empty target folders are
|
|
96
|
+
tidied up, and anything already absent is reported as skipped.
|
|
97
|
+
|
|
84
98
|
## Skills included
|
|
85
99
|
|
|
86
100
|
| Skill | Output file | Purpose |
|
|
87
101
|
|-------|-------------|---------|
|
|
88
102
|
| `f6s-copywriting` | `f6s/f6s-profile-copy.txt` | Full F6S startup profile copy |
|
|
89
103
|
| `linkedin-copywriting` | `linkedin copywriting/linkedin-page-copy.txt` | Full LinkedIn Company Page copy |
|
|
104
|
+
| `nvidia-inception-starter` | `nvidia-inception/inception-readiness-report.md` | Scored NVIDIA Inception readiness audit + 90-day plan |
|
|
105
|
+
| `nvidia-inception-idea-booster` | `nvidia-inception/elevated-idea.md` | Reads your idea files and elevates them to NVIDIA's preferences |
|
|
106
|
+
| `nvidia-product-inventor` | `products_raw/<Product>/product.md` | Invents 3–6 GPU-essential products (4–10 letter names) from your idea |
|
|
90
107
|
|
|
91
108
|
Each skill keeps **every field below** the platform's character limit (with ~10%
|
|
92
109
|
headroom) and verifies counts before finishing.
|
package/bin/cli.js
CHANGED
|
@@ -144,6 +144,30 @@ function installToAgent(agentKey, agent, scope, skills) {
|
|
|
144
144
|
}
|
|
145
145
|
}
|
|
146
146
|
|
|
147
|
+
// Returns the number of items actually removed.
|
|
148
|
+
function removeFromAgent(agentKey, agent, scope, skills) {
|
|
149
|
+
const targetDir = resolveTarget(agent, scope);
|
|
150
|
+
const tag = scope === 'project' ? 'workspace' : scope;
|
|
151
|
+
let removed = 0;
|
|
152
|
+
for (const skill of skills) {
|
|
153
|
+
const target = agent.format === 'skill'
|
|
154
|
+
? path.join(targetDir, skill)
|
|
155
|
+
: path.join(targetDir, skill + (agent.ext || '.md'));
|
|
156
|
+
if (fs.existsSync(target)) {
|
|
157
|
+
fs.rmSync(target, { recursive: true, force: true });
|
|
158
|
+
removed++;
|
|
159
|
+
console.log(` ${paint(RAW.green, '✓')} ${paint(RAW.bold, agent.label)} ${c.dim}(${tag})${c.reset} ${skill} ${c.dim}removed ← ${target}${c.reset}`);
|
|
160
|
+
} else {
|
|
161
|
+
console.log(` ${paint(RAW.dim, '·')} ${agent.label} ${c.dim}(${tag})${c.reset} ${skill} ${c.dim}— not found, skipped${c.reset}`);
|
|
162
|
+
}
|
|
163
|
+
}
|
|
164
|
+
// Tidy up the now-empty rules/skills dir we may have created.
|
|
165
|
+
try {
|
|
166
|
+
if (fs.existsSync(targetDir) && fs.readdirSync(targetDir).length === 0) fs.rmdirSync(targetDir);
|
|
167
|
+
} catch (_) {}
|
|
168
|
+
return removed;
|
|
169
|
+
}
|
|
170
|
+
|
|
147
171
|
function box(lines) {
|
|
148
172
|
const vis = (s) => s.replace(/\x1b\[[0-9;]*m/g, '');
|
|
149
173
|
const width = Math.max(...lines.map((l) => vis(l).length));
|
|
@@ -253,11 +277,12 @@ function usage() {
|
|
|
253
277
|
|
|
254
278
|
Usage:
|
|
255
279
|
spirewise [install] [options] run interactive picker for anything not set
|
|
280
|
+
spirewise remove [options] uninstall skills (alias: uninstall)
|
|
256
281
|
spirewise list list available skills
|
|
257
282
|
spirewise agents list supported agents + folders
|
|
258
283
|
|
|
259
284
|
Options:
|
|
260
|
-
-s, --skills <a,b> skills to install
|
|
285
|
+
-s, --skills <a,b> skills to install/remove (default: all / pick)
|
|
261
286
|
-a, --agents <a,b> agents to target (default: all / pick) alias: --agent
|
|
262
287
|
-sc, --scope <s> workspace | global | both (default: pick)
|
|
263
288
|
--workspace | --global | --both scope shortcuts
|
|
@@ -273,15 +298,18 @@ Examples:
|
|
|
273
298
|
npx spirewise # full interactive picker
|
|
274
299
|
npx spirewise -sc both # pick skills+agents, scope=both
|
|
275
300
|
npx spirewise -s f6s-copywriting -a claude,cursor -sc workspace
|
|
301
|
+
npx spirewise remove -sc both # uninstall (pick skills+agents)
|
|
276
302
|
`);
|
|
277
303
|
}
|
|
278
304
|
|
|
279
305
|
async function main() {
|
|
280
306
|
let argv = process.argv.slice(2);
|
|
281
307
|
let command = 'install';
|
|
282
|
-
if (['list', 'install', 'agents'].includes(argv[0])) { command = argv[0]; argv = argv.slice(1); }
|
|
308
|
+
if (['list', 'install', 'agents', 'remove', 'uninstall'].includes(argv[0])) { command = argv[0]; argv = argv.slice(1); }
|
|
283
309
|
else if (argv[0] === '-h' || argv[0] === '--help') { usage(); return; }
|
|
284
310
|
|
|
311
|
+
const action = (command === 'remove' || command === 'uninstall') ? 'remove' : 'install';
|
|
312
|
+
|
|
285
313
|
const available = availableSkills();
|
|
286
314
|
if (available.length === 0) die('No skills found in package.');
|
|
287
315
|
|
|
@@ -300,6 +328,8 @@ async function main() {
|
|
|
300
328
|
|
|
301
329
|
const o = parseArgs(argv);
|
|
302
330
|
const tty = process.stdin.isTTY;
|
|
331
|
+
const verb = action === 'remove' ? 'remove' : 'install';
|
|
332
|
+
const Verb = action === 'remove' ? 'Remove' : 'Install';
|
|
303
333
|
banner();
|
|
304
334
|
|
|
305
335
|
// 1) SKILLS
|
|
@@ -308,8 +338,8 @@ async function main() {
|
|
|
308
338
|
for (const s of skills) if (!available.includes(s)) die(`Unknown skill '${s}'. Run "spirewise list".`);
|
|
309
339
|
} else if (tty) {
|
|
310
340
|
skills = await interactiveSelect({
|
|
311
|
-
title:
|
|
312
|
-
subtitle: 'Copy templates to install into your agents',
|
|
341
|
+
title: `Step 1/3 · Select skills to ${verb}`,
|
|
342
|
+
subtitle: action === 'remove' ? 'These will be deleted from the chosen agents' : 'Copy templates to install into your agents',
|
|
313
343
|
items: available.map((s) => ({ value: s, label: s, hint: skillHint(s) })),
|
|
314
344
|
multi: true, preselected: available,
|
|
315
345
|
});
|
|
@@ -323,8 +353,8 @@ async function main() {
|
|
|
323
353
|
for (const k of agentKeys) if (!AGENTS[k]) die(`Unknown agent '${k}'. Run "spirewise agents".`);
|
|
324
354
|
} else if (tty) {
|
|
325
355
|
agentKeys = await interactiveSelect({
|
|
326
|
-
title:
|
|
327
|
-
subtitle: 'Each agent gets the skills in its own folder + format',
|
|
356
|
+
title: `Step 2/3 · Select agents`,
|
|
357
|
+
subtitle: action === 'remove' ? 'Skills are removed from each agent’s folder' : 'Each agent gets the skills in its own folder + format',
|
|
328
358
|
items: Object.entries(AGENTS).map(([k, a]) => ({ value: k, label: a.label, hint: `(${k}) · ${a.format}` })),
|
|
329
359
|
multi: true, preselected: Object.keys(AGENTS),
|
|
330
360
|
});
|
|
@@ -337,7 +367,7 @@ async function main() {
|
|
|
337
367
|
if (!scope && tty) {
|
|
338
368
|
scope = await interactiveSelect({
|
|
339
369
|
title: 'Step 3/3 · Select scope',
|
|
340
|
-
subtitle: 'Where should the skills live?',
|
|
370
|
+
subtitle: action === 'remove' ? 'Where to remove the skills from?' : 'Where should the skills live?',
|
|
341
371
|
items: [
|
|
342
372
|
{ value: 'project', label: 'Workspace', hint: 'this folder only — the current project' },
|
|
343
373
|
{ value: 'global', label: 'Global', hint: 'your home folders — applies to all projects' },
|
|
@@ -350,18 +380,30 @@ async function main() {
|
|
|
350
380
|
if (!['project', 'global', 'both'].includes(scope)) die(`Invalid scope '${scope}'.`);
|
|
351
381
|
const scopes = scope === 'both' ? ['project', 'global'] : [scope];
|
|
352
382
|
|
|
353
|
-
//
|
|
383
|
+
// ACTION
|
|
354
384
|
console.log('');
|
|
355
|
-
info(
|
|
385
|
+
info(`${Verb}ing ${paint(RAW.bold, String(skills.length))} skill(s) ${action === 'remove' ? 'from' : 'into'} ${paint(RAW.bold, String(agentKeys.length))} agent(s) · scope ${paint(RAW.bold, scope === 'project' ? 'workspace' : scope)}`);
|
|
386
|
+
|
|
356
387
|
let count = 0;
|
|
357
|
-
for (const sc of scopes) for (const k of agentKeys) {
|
|
388
|
+
for (const sc of scopes) for (const k of agentKeys) {
|
|
389
|
+
if (action === 'remove') count += removeFromAgent(k, AGENTS[k], sc, skills);
|
|
390
|
+
else { installToAgent(k, AGENTS[k], sc, skills); count += skills.length; }
|
|
391
|
+
}
|
|
358
392
|
|
|
359
393
|
console.log('');
|
|
360
|
-
|
|
361
|
-
|
|
362
|
-
|
|
363
|
-
|
|
364
|
-
|
|
394
|
+
if (action === 'remove') {
|
|
395
|
+
box([
|
|
396
|
+
`Removed ${paint(RAW.bold, String(count))} item(s) from ${paint(RAW.bold, String(agentKeys.length))} agent(s)`,
|
|
397
|
+
`scope: ${scopes.map((s) => (s === 'project' ? 'workspace' : s)).join(' + ')}`,
|
|
398
|
+
count === 0 ? `nothing matched — already clean` : `done — skills removed`,
|
|
399
|
+
]);
|
|
400
|
+
} else {
|
|
401
|
+
box([
|
|
402
|
+
`Installed ${paint(RAW.bold, String(skills.length))} skill(s) into ${paint(RAW.bold, String(agentKeys.length))} agent(s)`,
|
|
403
|
+
`scope: ${scopes.map((s) => (s === 'project' ? 'workspace' : s)).join(' + ')} · ${count} item(s) written`,
|
|
404
|
+
`next: open your agent and say "write our F6S profile copy"`,
|
|
405
|
+
]);
|
|
406
|
+
}
|
|
365
407
|
console.log('');
|
|
366
408
|
}
|
|
367
409
|
|
package/install.sh
CHANGED
|
@@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ usage() {
|
|
|
62
62
|
spirewise — install copywriting Agent Skills into all your AI agents.
|
|
63
63
|
|
|
64
64
|
Usage:
|
|
65
|
-
install.sh [scope] [-a agents] [-s skills]
|
|
65
|
+
install.sh [install] [scope] [-a agents] [-s skills]
|
|
66
|
+
install.sh remove [scope] [-a agents] [-s skills] # uninstall (alias: uninstall)
|
|
66
67
|
|
|
67
68
|
Scope:
|
|
68
69
|
-sc, --scope <s> workspace | global | both
|
|
@@ -161,8 +162,22 @@ resolve_dir() {
|
|
|
161
162
|
install_for_agent() {
|
|
162
163
|
local key="$1" label="$2" fmt="$3" ext="$4" dir="$5" scope="$6" base="$7"; shift 7
|
|
163
164
|
local skills=("$@")
|
|
164
|
-
mkdir -p "$dir"
|
|
165
165
|
local s
|
|
166
|
+
if [[ "$MODE" == "remove" ]]; then
|
|
167
|
+
for s in "${skills[@]}"; do
|
|
168
|
+
local target
|
|
169
|
+
if [[ "$fmt" == "skill" ]]; then target="$dir/$s"; else target="$dir/$s$ext"; fi
|
|
170
|
+
if [[ -e "$target" ]]; then
|
|
171
|
+
rm -rf "$target"; REMOVED=$((REMOVED+1))
|
|
172
|
+
substep "$label ($scope) $s removed <- $target"
|
|
173
|
+
else
|
|
174
|
+
substep "$label ($scope) $s — not found, skipped"
|
|
175
|
+
fi
|
|
176
|
+
done
|
|
177
|
+
[[ -d "$dir" ]] && rmdir "$dir" 2>/dev/null || true
|
|
178
|
+
return 0
|
|
179
|
+
fi
|
|
180
|
+
mkdir -p "$dir"
|
|
166
181
|
for s in "${skills[@]}"; do
|
|
167
182
|
fetch_skill "$s" "$base"
|
|
168
183
|
if [[ "$fmt" == "skill" ]]; then
|
|
@@ -180,12 +195,18 @@ install_for_agent() {
|
|
|
180
195
|
}
|
|
181
196
|
|
|
182
197
|
# ---- Parse args ------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
198
|
+
MODE="install"
|
|
199
|
+
REMOVED=0
|
|
183
200
|
SCOPE=""
|
|
184
201
|
AGENT_FILTER=""
|
|
185
202
|
DO_LIST=false
|
|
186
203
|
SELECTED=()
|
|
204
|
+
[[ "${1:-}" == "remove" || "${1:-}" == "uninstall" ]] && { MODE="remove"; shift; }
|
|
205
|
+
[[ "${1:-}" == "install" ]] && shift
|
|
187
206
|
while [[ $# -gt 0 ]]; do
|
|
188
207
|
case "$1" in
|
|
208
|
+
remove|uninstall) MODE="remove"; shift ;;
|
|
209
|
+
--remove|--uninstall) MODE="remove"; shift ;;
|
|
189
210
|
--project|--workspace|--local) SCOPE="project"; shift ;;
|
|
190
211
|
--global) SCOPE="global"; shift ;;
|
|
191
212
|
--both) SCOPE="both"; shift ;;
|
|
@@ -228,10 +249,10 @@ step 2 "Selecting target agents"
|
|
|
228
249
|
if [[ -n "$AGENT_FILTER" ]]; then substep "agents: $AGENT_FILTER"; else substep "agents: all supported"; fi
|
|
229
250
|
|
|
230
251
|
# Step 3: scope — prompt if not given.
|
|
231
|
-
step 3 "Choosing
|
|
252
|
+
step 3 "Choosing scope"
|
|
232
253
|
if [[ -z "$SCOPE" ]]; then
|
|
233
254
|
if [[ -t 0 ]]; then
|
|
234
|
-
info "Where should the skills be installed?"
|
|
255
|
+
[[ "$MODE" == "remove" ]] && info "Where should the skills be removed from?" || info "Where should the skills be installed?"
|
|
235
256
|
echo " 1) Workspace (this folder only — current project)"
|
|
236
257
|
echo " 2) Global (your home folders — all projects)"
|
|
237
258
|
echo " 3) Both"
|
|
@@ -247,8 +268,8 @@ fi
|
|
|
247
268
|
|
|
248
269
|
SCOPES=("$SCOPE"); [[ "$SCOPE" == "both" ]] && SCOPES=("project" "global")
|
|
249
270
|
|
|
250
|
-
# Step 4: install
|
|
251
|
-
step 4 "Installing"
|
|
271
|
+
# Step 4: install / remove
|
|
272
|
+
[[ "$MODE" == "remove" ]] && step 4 "Removing" || step 4 "Installing"
|
|
252
273
|
for sc in "${SCOPES[@]}"; do
|
|
253
274
|
for entry in "${AGENTS[@]}"; do
|
|
254
275
|
IFS='|' read -r key label fmt ext pdir gdir <<<"$entry"
|
|
@@ -256,10 +277,15 @@ for sc in "${SCOPES[@]}"; do
|
|
|
256
277
|
case ",$AGENT_FILTER," in *",$key,"*) ;; *) continue ;; esac
|
|
257
278
|
fi
|
|
258
279
|
if [[ "$sc" == "project" ]]; then dir="$(resolve_dir "$pdir")"; else dir="$(resolve_dir "$gdir")"; fi
|
|
259
|
-
|
|
280
|
+
scope_tag="$sc"; [[ "$sc" == "project" ]] && scope_tag="workspace"
|
|
281
|
+
install_for_agent "$key" "$label" "$fmt" "$ext" "$dir" "$scope_tag" "$BASE" "${SELECTED[@]}"
|
|
260
282
|
done
|
|
261
283
|
done
|
|
262
284
|
|
|
263
285
|
printf '\n'
|
|
264
|
-
|
|
286
|
+
if [[ "$MODE" == "remove" ]]; then
|
|
287
|
+
ok "Removed $REMOVED item(s)."
|
|
288
|
+
else
|
|
289
|
+
ok "Installed ${#SELECTED[@]} skill(s). Next: open your agent and say \"write our F6S profile copy\"."
|
|
290
|
+
fi
|
|
265
291
|
|
package/package.json
CHANGED
package/skills/README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -9,6 +9,9 @@ ready-to-paste copy for company profile pages, with strict character-limit safet
|
|
|
9
9
|
|-------|--------|---------|
|
|
10
10
|
| `f6s-copywriting` | `f6s/f6s-profile-copy.txt` | Full F6S startup profile copy |
|
|
11
11
|
| `linkedin-copywriting` | `linkedin copywriting/linkedin-page-copy.txt` | Full LinkedIn Company Page copy |
|
|
12
|
+
| `nvidia-inception-starter` | `nvidia-inception/inception-readiness-report.md` | Scored NVIDIA Inception readiness audit + 90-day plan |
|
|
13
|
+
| `nvidia-inception-idea-booster` | `nvidia-inception/elevated-idea.md` | Reads your idea files and elevates them to NVIDIA's preferences |
|
|
14
|
+
| `nvidia-product-inventor` | `products_raw/<Product>/product.md` | Invents 3–6 GPU-essential products (4–10 letter names) from your idea |
|
|
12
15
|
|
|
13
16
|
Each skill writes one plain-text file and keeps **every field below** the
|
|
14
17
|
platform's character limit (with ~10% headroom).
|
|
@@ -54,6 +57,17 @@ Flags:
|
|
|
54
57
|
In the picker: **↑/↓** move, **space** toggle, **a** all/none, **enter**
|
|
55
58
|
confirm, **esc** cancel.
|
|
56
59
|
|
|
60
|
+
### Uninstall
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
`remove` (alias `uninstall`) reuses the same picker/flags and deletes skills from
|
|
63
|
+
workspace, global, or both:
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
```bash
|
|
66
|
+
npx spirewise remove # interactive
|
|
67
|
+
npx spirewise remove -sc both # pick skills+agents, both scopes
|
|
68
|
+
npx spirewise remove -s f6s-copywriting -a cursor -sc workspace
|
|
69
|
+
```
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
57
71
|
Supported agents and their folders (workspace / global):
|
|
58
72
|
|
|
59
73
|
| Agent | Workspace | Global | Format |
|
|
@@ -78,6 +92,7 @@ If you can't use npm, the bundled `install.sh` mirrors the CLI over `curl`:
|
|
|
78
92
|
```bash
|
|
79
93
|
# from a clone
|
|
80
94
|
./install.sh --both
|
|
95
|
+
./install.sh remove --both # uninstall
|
|
81
96
|
|
|
82
97
|
# remote
|
|
83
98
|
curl -fsSL https://raw.githubusercontent.com/spirerise/spirewise/main/install.sh | bash -s -- --both
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# f6s-copywriting
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
Generate complete, ready-to-paste copy for an **F6S (f6s.com)** startup/company
|
|
4
|
+
profile — written like a senior unicorn-startup marketer: humanized,
|
|
5
|
+
attention-grabbing, and conversion-focused, with **every field kept under its
|
|
6
|
+
character limit**.
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
## Install
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
```bash
|
|
11
|
+
npx spirewise install -s f6s-copywriting # pick agents + scope
|
|
12
|
+
npx spirewise install -s f6s-copywriting -a claude,cursor -sc workspace
|
|
13
|
+
```
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
## Remove
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
```bash
|
|
18
|
+
npx spirewise remove -s f6s-copywriting # pick agents + scope
|
|
19
|
+
npx spirewise remove -s f6s-copywriting -a claude,cursor -sc both
|
|
20
|
+
```
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
(No Node? `./install.sh -s f6s-copywriting` and `./install.sh remove -s f6s-copywriting`.)
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
## Use
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
After installing, ask your agent:
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
> "Write our F6S profile copy"
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
It gathers your company details, then writes **`f6s/f6s-profile-copy.txt`** in
|
|
31
|
+
your project root.
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
## Output
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
`f6s/f6s-profile-copy.txt` — every F6S field (name, tagline, short/full
|
|
36
|
+
description, product, business model, traction, needs, team, etc.) with a live
|
|
37
|
+
`(count/limit)` next to each length-limited field.
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
## Character limits (kept under, ~10% headroom)
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
| Field | Limit |
|
|
42
|
+
|---|---|
|
|
43
|
+
| Company name | 50 |
|
|
44
|
+
| Tagline / one-liner | 140 |
|
|
45
|
+
| Short description | 255 |
|
|
46
|
+
| Full description | 2000 |
|
|
47
|
+
| Product description | 1000 |
|
|
48
|
+
| Business model | 500 |
|
|
49
|
+
| Traction / achievements | 1000 |
|
|
50
|
+
| Needs / seeking | 500 |
|
|
51
|
+
| Team member bio (each) | 500 |
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
See `SKILL.md` for the full voice/quality standard and output template.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# linkedin-copywriting
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
Generate complete, ready-to-paste copy for a **LinkedIn Company Page** — written
|
|
4
|
+
like a senior unicorn-startup marketer: humanized, attention-grabbing, and
|
|
5
|
+
conversion-focused, with **every field kept under its character limit**.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## Install
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
```bash
|
|
10
|
+
npx spirewise install -s linkedin-copywriting # pick agents + scope
|
|
11
|
+
npx spirewise install -s linkedin-copywriting -a claude,cursor -sc workspace
|
|
12
|
+
```
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
## Remove
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
```bash
|
|
17
|
+
npx spirewise remove -s linkedin-copywriting # pick agents + scope
|
|
18
|
+
npx spirewise remove -s linkedin-copywriting -a claude,cursor -sc both
|
|
19
|
+
```
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
(No Node? `./install.sh -s linkedin-copywriting` and `./install.sh remove -s linkedin-copywriting`.)
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Use
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
After installing, ask your agent:
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
> "Create the LinkedIn company page copy"
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
It gathers your company details, then writes
|
|
30
|
+
**`linkedin copywriting/linkedin-page-copy.txt`** in your project root.
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
## Output
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
`linkedin copywriting/linkedin-page-copy.txt` — company name, tagline, About /
|
|
35
|
+
Overview, specialties, industry, size, HQ, founded, and an optional intro post,
|
|
36
|
+
each with a live `(count/limit)`.
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
## Character limits (kept under, ~10% headroom)
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
| Field | Limit |
|
|
41
|
+
|---|---|
|
|
42
|
+
| Company name | 100 |
|
|
43
|
+
| Tagline | 120 |
|
|
44
|
+
| About / Overview | 2000 (first ~150 chars = preview hook) |
|
|
45
|
+
| Specialty (each) | 30 |
|
|
46
|
+
| Specialties (total) | 20 items |
|
|
47
|
+
| Intro/launch post | 3000 |
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
See `SKILL.md` for the full voice/quality standard and output template.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# nvidia-inception-idea-booster
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
Reads your **existing startup-idea files** in the project and elevates the idea
|
|
4
|
+
into a stronger, defensible, **NVIDIA-Inception-ready** version — using exactly
|
|
5
|
+
the traits NVIDIA prefers (deep tech, physical/agentic AI, essential GPU
|
|
6
|
+
acceleration, defensibility, large markets, NVIDIA ecosystem fit). It elevates
|
|
7
|
+
your real idea; it does not invent a different company.
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
> Pairs with **`nvidia-inception-starter`**: boost the idea here, then score and
|
|
10
|
+
> audit it there.
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
## Install
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
```bash
|
|
15
|
+
npx spirewise install -s nvidia-inception-idea-booster # pick agents + scope
|
|
16
|
+
npx spirewise install -s nvidia-inception-idea-booster -a claude,cursor -sc workspace
|
|
17
|
+
```
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Remove
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
```bash
|
|
22
|
+
npx spirewise remove -s nvidia-inception-idea-booster # pick agents + scope
|
|
23
|
+
npx spirewise remove -s nvidia-inception-idea-booster -a claude,cursor -sc both
|
|
24
|
+
```
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
(No Node? `./install.sh -s nvidia-inception-idea-booster` and `./install.sh remove -s nvidia-inception-idea-booster`.)
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
## Use
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
Put your idea notes anywhere in the project (`idea.md`, `README`, `pitch`,
|
|
31
|
+
`vision`, `notes`, a one-pager, etc.), then ask your agent:
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
> "Make my startup idea stronger for NVIDIA Inception"
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
It reads those files and writes **`nvidia-inception/elevated-idea.md`**.
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
## Output
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
`nvidia-inception/elevated-idea.md` — original idea (restated), an elevated
|
|
40
|
+
one-liner and pitch, a **before → after** upgrade table across every
|
|
41
|
+
NVIDIA-preference lever, a recommended NVIDIA stack (tech → use case → reason),
|
|
42
|
+
a moat plan, a beachhead→expansion market path, a proof plan, and honest gaps.
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
## NVIDIA-preference levers it optimizes
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
| Lever | What it pushes for |
|
|
47
|
+
|---|---|
|
|
48
|
+
| Deep tech / IP | Real model/system/hardware differentiation, not an AI wrapper |
|
|
49
|
+
| Physical / Agentic AI | Robotics, autonomy, embodied/edge, action-taking agents |
|
|
50
|
+
| GPU essential | Workloads that genuinely require accelerated compute |
|
|
51
|
+
| Defensibility | Proprietary data/model/hardware or NVIDIA-stack integration |
|
|
52
|
+
| Market & why-now | Large TAM, clear beachhead, commercialization path |
|
|
53
|
+
| Ecosystem fit | Authentic use of CUDA, Isaac, Omniverse, Jetson, NIM, etc. |
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
See `SKILL.md` for the full method and output template.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: nvidia-inception-idea-booster
|
|
3
|
+
description: >-
|
|
4
|
+
Read a startup's existing idea/notes files in the project and elevate the idea
|
|
5
|
+
into a far stronger, NVIDIA-Inception-ready version — leaning on exactly the
|
|
6
|
+
traits NVIDIA prefers (deep tech, physical/agentic AI, essential GPU
|
|
7
|
+
acceleration, defensibility, large markets, NVIDIA ecosystem fit). Use when the
|
|
8
|
+
user asks to "make my startup idea stronger for NVIDIA", "elevate my idea",
|
|
9
|
+
"improve my startup for Inception", or "rewrite my idea to fit NVIDIA". Writes
|
|
10
|
+
an elevated idea document to an `nvidia-inception/` folder in the project root.
|
|
11
|
+
For scoring/auditing an existing company, use nvidia-inception-starter instead.
|
|
12
|
+
---
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
# NVIDIA Inception Idea Booster
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
Take whatever startup idea already exists in the project, understand it deeply,
|
|
17
|
+
then **transform it into a stronger, defensible, NVIDIA-aligned idea** that maps
|
|
18
|
+
to what NVIDIA Inception actually rewards — without inventing a different company.
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
## When to use vs. the sibling skill
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
- **This skill** reshapes and strengthens the *idea* itself (positioning, wedge,
|
|
23
|
+
tech depth, NVIDIA fit), starting from the user's existing files.
|
|
24
|
+
- **`nvidia-inception-starter`** scores and audits an existing company against
|
|
25
|
+
acceptance criteria and writes a readiness report.
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
Use both together: boost the idea here, then score it there.
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Step 1 — Read the existing idea
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
Discover and read the startup-related files already in the project. Look for:
|
|
32
|
+
- `idea*.md/.txt`, `README*`, `pitch*`, `business-plan*`, `vision*`, `notes*`,
|
|
33
|
+
`one-pager*`, `deck*`, `prd*`, `concept*`, `startup*`, and any `docs/` content.
|
|
34
|
+
- Prefer Markdown/text/PDF-exported notes. Scan the repo for whatever describes
|
|
35
|
+
the problem, product, market, and tech.
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
Extract and restate, in your own words:
|
|
38
|
+
- Problem, who has it, and current alternatives
|
|
39
|
+
- Proposed product/solution and how it works
|
|
40
|
+
- Target market and business model
|
|
41
|
+
- Any AI/ML, data, or compute involved
|
|
42
|
+
- Team, stage, traction, and named tech stack
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
If little exists, ask 3–5 focused questions before boosting. **Never discard the
|
|
45
|
+
founder's core intent** — elevate it, don't replace it. Flag unknowns as
|
|
46
|
+
`[UNKNOWN]` rather than inventing facts.
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
## What NVIDIA prefers (the levers you optimize for)
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
Pull the idea toward these — but only where it's authentic to the product:
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
1. **Deep tech / novel IP** — real algorithmic, model, system, or hardware
|
|
53
|
+
differentiation; not an "AI wrapper" over someone else's API.
|
|
54
|
+
2. **Physical & agentic AI** — robotics, autonomy, embodied/edge AI, perception
|
|
55
|
+
+ navigation + actuation, or agents that take real actions. NVIDIA is leaning
|
|
56
|
+
hard into Physical AI.
|
|
57
|
+
3. **GPU acceleration is essential** — the workload genuinely needs accelerated
|
|
58
|
+
compute (training/fine-tuning, large-scale inference, simulation, 3D, RL,
|
|
59
|
+
vision, LLMs) — GPUs are a *must-have*, not a nice-to-have.
|
|
60
|
+
4. **Defensibility / moat** — proprietary models, a unique/proprietary dataset,
|
|
61
|
+
custom hardware, or deep integration with the NVIDIA stack for stickiness.
|
|
62
|
+
5. **Large, impactful market** — autonomy, robotics, healthcare AI, advanced
|
|
63
|
+
manufacturing, smart cities, enterprise AI — clear, massive TAM and a path to
|
|
64
|
+
commercialize and scale globally.
|
|
65
|
+
6. **Technical rigor & momentum** — prototypes, benchmarks, pilots, publications;
|
|
66
|
+
a credible, technical founding team.
|
|
67
|
+
7. **NVIDIA ecosystem synergy** — would clearly use and benefit from NVIDIA
|
|
68
|
+
platforms (CUDA, TensorRT, Triton, NIM, NeMo, Riva, Metropolis, Holoscan,
|
|
69
|
+
Omniverse, Isaac, Jetson, DGX / NVIDIA AI Enterprise), and could collaborate
|
|
70
|
+
on reference designs / whitepapers / joint GTM.
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
Excluded/weak profiles to steer away from: consulting/outsourcing, crypto
|
|
73
|
+
mining/trading, pure reselling, thin AI wrappers with no real compute need.
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
## Step 2 — Elevate the idea
|
|
76
|
+
|
|
77
|
+
For each lever, produce a concrete upgrade to the existing idea:
|
|
78
|
+
- **Sharpen the wedge:** a specific, painful, narrow beachhead use case where
|
|
79
|
+
the product wins decisively before expanding.
|
|
80
|
+
- **Deepen the tech:** identify where to add genuine deep-tech depth (a
|
|
81
|
+
proprietary model, a data flywheel, a simulation/edge component) so GPUs become
|
|
82
|
+
essential. Be honest about what is real vs. aspirational.
|
|
83
|
+
- **Add a Physical/Agentic angle where credible:** reframe toward embodied/edge
|
|
84
|
+
or agentic execution if it fits the problem — don't force it.
|
|
85
|
+
- **Build the moat:** name the defensible asset (data, model, hardware,
|
|
86
|
+
integration) and how it compounds over time.
|
|
87
|
+
- **Right-size the market:** beachhead → adjacent expansion → full TAM, with the
|
|
88
|
+
"why now."
|
|
89
|
+
- **Map NVIDIA tech authentically:** for each technical need, the specific NVIDIA
|
|
90
|
+
technology that serves it and why — tied to a real use case, never as buzzwords.
|
|
91
|
+
|
|
92
|
+
Always keep two views: the **original idea** and the **elevated idea**, so the
|
|
93
|
+
founder sees exactly what changed and why it raises acceptance odds.
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
## Output — write the elevated idea
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
1. Create an `nvidia-inception/` folder in the project root if missing.
|
|
98
|
+
2. Write `nvidia-inception/elevated-idea.md` (UTF-8 Markdown):
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
```
|
|
101
|
+
# Elevated Startup Idea — <Company / Working Name>
|
|
102
|
+
Generated: <YYYY-MM-DD>
|
|
103
|
+
Sources read: <list the files you ingested>
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
## Original Idea (as understood)
|
|
106
|
+
<faithful restatement of the founder's current idea>
|
|
107
|
+
|
|
108
|
+
## Elevated One-Liner
|
|
109
|
+
<one sharp sentence, NVIDIA-aligned, no hype>
|
|
110
|
+
|
|
111
|
+
## Elevated Pitch (problem → wedge → solution → why now)
|
|
112
|
+
|
|
113
|
+
## NVIDIA-Preference Upgrades
|
|
114
|
+
| Lever | Before | After (elevated) | Why it helps acceptance |
|
|
115
|
+
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
116
|
+
| Deep tech / IP | … | … | … |
|
|
117
|
+
| Physical / Agentic AI | … | … | … |
|
|
118
|
+
| GPU essential | … | … | … |
|
|
119
|
+
| Defensibility / moat | … | … | … |
|
|
120
|
+
| Market & why-now | … | … | … |
|
|
121
|
+
| NVIDIA ecosystem fit | … | … | … |
|
|
122
|
+
|
|
123
|
+
## Recommended NVIDIA Stack (tech → use case → reason)
|
|
124
|
+
|
|
125
|
+
## Defensibility / Moat Plan
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
## Beachhead → Expansion Market Path
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
## Proof Plan (prototype, benchmark, pilot, publication)
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
## Risks & Honest Gaps (incl. anything still [UNKNOWN])
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
## Next Steps (so it's ready for nvidia-inception-starter scoring)
|
|
134
|
+
```
|
|
135
|
+
|
|
136
|
+
## Quality bar
|
|
137
|
+
|
|
138
|
+
- **Elevate, don't fabricate.** Strengthen the real idea; never swap it for a
|
|
139
|
+
trendier one or claim capabilities that don't exist.
|
|
140
|
+
- Make GPU dependence and the moat *believable*, with specifics.
|
|
141
|
+
- Recommend NVIDIA tech only where it authentically fits a stated need.
|
|
142
|
+
- Keep the before/after explicit so the founder can choose what to adopt.
|
|
143
|
+
|
|
144
|
+
## Verification checklist (run before finishing)
|
|
145
|
+
|
|
146
|
+
1. You actually read the existing idea files and listed them under "Sources read".
|
|
147
|
+
2. `nvidia-inception/elevated-idea.md` exists with every section above.
|
|
148
|
+
3. The elevated idea preserves the founder's core intent.
|
|
149
|
+
4. Every NVIDIA-preference lever has a concrete before → after upgrade.
|
|
150
|
+
5. NVIDIA tech recommendations are tied to real use cases, not buzzwords.
|
|
151
|
+
6. Honest gaps and `[UNKNOWN]`s are stated, not hidden.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# nvidia-inception-starter
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
An expert advisor that prepares, evaluates, and optimizes your startup for
|
|
4
|
+
**NVIDIA Inception** acceptance — it researches the program and accepted
|
|
5
|
+
companies, scores you **0–100**, audits website/product/AI/architecture/NVIDIA
|
|
6
|
+
alignment, and writes a full readiness report with a 90-day plan.
|
|
7
|
+
|
|
8
|
+
## Install
|
|
9
|
+
|
|
10
|
+
```bash
|
|
11
|
+
npx spirewise install -s nvidia-inception-starter # pick agents + scope
|
|
12
|
+
npx spirewise install -s nvidia-inception-starter -a claude,cursor -sc workspace
|
|
13
|
+
```
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
## Remove
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
```bash
|
|
18
|
+
npx spirewise remove -s nvidia-inception-starter # pick agents + scope
|
|
19
|
+
npx spirewise remove -s nvidia-inception-starter -a claude,cursor -sc both
|
|
20
|
+
```
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
(No Node? `./install.sh -s nvidia-inception-starter` and `./install.sh remove -s nvidia-inception-starter`.)
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
## Use
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
After installing, ask your agent:
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
> "Assess my startup for NVIDIA Inception"
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
It collects your company details (and researches the program + accepted
|
|
31
|
+
startups), then writes
|
|
32
|
+
**`nvidia-inception/inception-readiness-report.md`** in your project root.
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
## Output
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
`nvidia-inception/inception-readiness-report.md` — Executive summary, Acceptance
|
|
37
|
+
Score (0–100), Acceptance Probability, Strength/Weakness analysis, Competitive
|
|
38
|
+
analysis, Website / Product / AI / Architecture / NVIDIA-alignment audits, an
|
|
39
|
+
Improvement Roadmap, a 90-Day Action Plan, and an Application Readiness report.
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
## Scoring weights
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
| Category | Weight |
|
|
44
|
+
|---|---|
|
|
45
|
+
| AI Strength | 20 |
|
|
46
|
+
| Technical Innovation | 15 |
|
|
47
|
+
| NVIDIA Alignment | 15 |
|
|
48
|
+
| Market Opportunity | 10 |
|
|
49
|
+
| Team Quality | 10 |
|
|
50
|
+
| Product Maturity | 10 |
|
|
51
|
+
| Website Quality | 5 |
|
|
52
|
+
| Pitch Readiness | 5 |
|
|
53
|
+
| Scalability | 5 |
|
|
54
|
+
| Competitive Advantage | 5 |
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
## Good to know
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
NVIDIA Inception is **free, equity-free**, has **no deadline**, and is open to
|
|
59
|
+
**all funding stages**. Core eligibility: incorporated, working website,
|
|
60
|
+
business email, ≥1 developer, generally <10 years old, building an **AI product**
|
|
61
|
+
(not consulting). See `SKILL.md` for the full method, facts, and report template.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: nvidia-inception-starter
|
|
3
|
+
description: >-
|
|
4
|
+
Expert startup advisor that prepares, evaluates, and optimizes a startup for
|
|
5
|
+
acceptance into NVIDIA Inception. Use when the user asks to "assess my startup
|
|
6
|
+
for NVIDIA Inception", "am I ready for NVIDIA Inception", "improve my NVIDIA
|
|
7
|
+
application", "NVIDIA Inception readiness", or wants a scored audit + roadmap.
|
|
8
|
+
Researches NVIDIA Inception and accepted startups, scores the company 0–100,
|
|
9
|
+
audits website/product/AI/architecture/NVIDIA-alignment, and writes a full
|
|
10
|
+
readiness report to an `nvidia-inception/` folder in the project root.
|
|
11
|
+
---
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
# NVIDIA Inception Starter
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
Prepare a startup for NVIDIA Inception: research the program and its accepted
|
|
16
|
+
companies, score the startup, audit every dimension that affects acceptance, and
|
|
17
|
+
produce a brutally honest readiness report with a 90-day action plan.
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
## Persona
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
Act as a **former NVIDIA Inception evaluator, AI startup investor, accelerator
|
|
22
|
+
mentor, and deep-tech strategist**. Be evidence-based, data-driven, highly
|
|
23
|
+
critical, and brutally accurate, but always actionable. Hold both an investor
|
|
24
|
+
mindset and a technical mindset. Never inflate scores to be nice — a realistic,
|
|
25
|
+
specific critique is more valuable than encouragement.
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
## Inputs needed
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
Gather (ask, or infer from the repo/website/links the user provides):
|
|
30
|
+
- Company name, website, one-line description, incorporation status + age
|
|
31
|
+
- What it builds, target market, industry, business model, pricing
|
|
32
|
+
- AI/ML usage and category (CV, GenAI, robotics, physical AI, enterprise AI…)
|
|
33
|
+
- Technical stack and any NVIDIA technologies used
|
|
34
|
+
- Funding stage, traction (users, revenue, growth, partnerships), team/founders
|
|
35
|
+
- Pitch deck / homepage copy if available
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
If details are missing, mark them as `[UNKNOWN]` in the report and lower the
|
|
38
|
+
relevant scores — do not invent facts.
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
## Step 1 — Research (do this before scoring)
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
Research to current, real sources. Do not rely on memory alone.
|
|
43
|
+
- **Official program:** eligibility, application process, tiers, benefits, FAQ
|
|
44
|
+
(nvidia.com/startups and the Inception FAQ).
|
|
45
|
+
- **Accepted startups:** study a broad sample (aim for many, ideally 50–100+)
|
|
46
|
+
from NVIDIA startup showcases, member spotlights, case studies, and blogs.
|
|
47
|
+
- For each accepted startup, note: industry, problem, market, product/AI
|
|
48
|
+
category, funding stage, tech stack, NVIDIA tech used, homepage headline,
|
|
49
|
+
value prop, traction, and competitive edge.
|
|
50
|
+
- **Detect patterns:** most common categories, AI use cases, funding stages,
|
|
51
|
+
founder backgrounds, website structures, messaging, and NVIDIA-tech usage.
|
|
52
|
+
- Convert patterns into **acceptance signals** (what accepted startups share)
|
|
53
|
+
and **risk signals** (what rejected/ineligible profiles share).
|
|
54
|
+
|
|
55
|
+
## Verified program facts (ground truth — keep current by re-checking)
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
Eligibility (typical):
|
|
58
|
+
- **Free, equity-free, no fees.** No application deadline; rolling review
|
|
59
|
+
(usually a few business days to ~2 weeks).
|
|
60
|
+
- Must be **incorporated** (registered legal entity), have a **working company
|
|
61
|
+
website**, use a **business email** (no generic/alias addresses), and employ
|
|
62
|
+
**at least one developer**.
|
|
63
|
+
- Generally **under 10 years old**, and **building AI / ML / data-science /
|
|
64
|
+
accelerated-computing products** — not selling consulting or outsourced dev.
|
|
65
|
+
- **Open to all funding stages** (bootstrapped → growth).
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
Commonly **not eligible**: consulting / outsourcing dev shops, crypto
|
|
68
|
+
(mining/trading), pure cloud service providers, resellers/distributors, and
|
|
69
|
+
public companies.
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
Tiers (startups progress as they grow): **Emerging → Scale → Premier**. Higher
|
|
72
|
+
tiers unlock more cloud credits, deeper engineering support, DLI training,
|
|
73
|
+
co-marketing, and investor access.
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
Benefits: NVIDIA SDKs + developer tools, Deep Learning Institute (DLI) training,
|
|
76
|
+
preferred hardware pricing, partner **cloud credits**, **Inception Capital
|
|
77
|
+
Connect / VC Alliance** investor access, co-marketing, badges, and events.
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
NVIDIA technologies to align with (cite the ones that genuinely fit): CUDA,
|
|
80
|
+
cuDNN, TensorRT, Triton, RAPIDS, NIM, NeMo, Riva, Metropolis, Holoscan,
|
|
81
|
+
Omniverse, Isaac (robotics), Jetson (edge), DGX / NVIDIA AI Enterprise.
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
## Step 2 — Score the startup (0–100)
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
Score each category, multiply by weight, sum to a total. Always justify each
|
|
86
|
+
score with specific evidence and a one-line "to reach the next level" note.
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
| Category | Weight |
|
|
89
|
+
|---|---|
|
|
90
|
+
| AI Strength | 20 |
|
|
91
|
+
| Technical Innovation | 15 |
|
|
92
|
+
| NVIDIA Alignment | 15 |
|
|
93
|
+
| Market Opportunity | 10 |
|
|
94
|
+
| Team Quality | 10 |
|
|
95
|
+
| Product Maturity | 10 |
|
|
96
|
+
| Website Quality | 5 |
|
|
97
|
+
| Pitch Readiness | 5 |
|
|
98
|
+
| Scalability | 5 |
|
|
99
|
+
| Competitive Advantage | 5 |
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
Map the total to an **acceptance probability** band and state it plainly:
|
|
102
|
+
- 85–100 — Very strong; likely accept. Polish and apply now.
|
|
103
|
+
- 70–84 — Strong; address 2–3 gaps, then apply.
|
|
104
|
+
- 50–69 — Borderline; meaningful work needed before applying.
|
|
105
|
+
- < 50 — Not ready; follow the roadmap first.
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
NVIDIA Alignment scoring guide: highest when the startup genuinely trains/runs
|
|
108
|
+
GPU-accelerated AI and would use NVIDIA tech in production; low for thin
|
|
109
|
+
"AI wrapper" products with no real compute need. Reward authenticity, not
|
|
110
|
+
buzzwords.
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
## Step 3 — Audits
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
Run each and list concrete findings + fixes:
|
|
115
|
+
- **Website audit:** homepage headline, value proposition, product + AI
|
|
116
|
+
explanation, technical credibility, use cases, case studies, architecture
|
|
117
|
+
clarity, visual quality, trust signals, investor readiness. Compare against
|
|
118
|
+
top Inception / fast-growing AI startups.
|
|
119
|
+
- **Product audit:** maturity (idea → MVP → production), differentiation, moat.
|
|
120
|
+
- **AI readiness audit:** real AI vs. wrapper, data advantage, model strategy,
|
|
121
|
+
evaluation/quality, compute needs.
|
|
122
|
+
- **Technical architecture audit:** scalability, GPU utilization, inference
|
|
123
|
+
path, edge vs. cloud, MLOps.
|
|
124
|
+
- **NVIDIA alignment audit:** which NVIDIA technologies fit and how to adopt
|
|
125
|
+
them credibly in the roadmap.
|
|
126
|
+
|
|
127
|
+
## Physical / Embodied AI module (if relevant)
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
If the startup touches robotics, autonomous/industrial systems, vision AI, edge
|
|
130
|
+
AI, digital twins, simulation, agentic, or embodied AI, recommend the fitting
|
|
131
|
+
stack: **Isaac** (robotics), **Omniverse** (simulation/digital twins),
|
|
132
|
+
**Jetson** (edge), **CUDA/TensorRT** (perf), **NIM** (inference microservices),
|
|
133
|
+
**NVIDIA AI Enterprise**. Tie each recommendation to a concrete use case — never
|
|
134
|
+
list tech for its own sake.
|
|
135
|
+
|
|
136
|
+
## Output — write the report file
|
|
137
|
+
|
|
138
|
+
1. Create an `nvidia-inception/` folder in the project root if missing.
|
|
139
|
+
2. Write `nvidia-inception/inception-readiness-report.md` (UTF-8 Markdown) with:
|
|
140
|
+
|
|
141
|
+
```
|
|
142
|
+
# NVIDIA Inception Readiness — <Company>
|
|
143
|
+
Generated: <YYYY-MM-DD>
|
|
144
|
+
|
|
145
|
+
## Executive Summary
|
|
146
|
+
## NVIDIA Inception Acceptance Score (XX/100, with per-category table)
|
|
147
|
+
## Acceptance Probability (band + one-line verdict)
|
|
148
|
+
## Strength Analysis
|
|
149
|
+
## Weakness Analysis
|
|
150
|
+
## Competitive Analysis
|
|
151
|
+
## Website Audit
|
|
152
|
+
## Product Audit
|
|
153
|
+
## AI Readiness Audit
|
|
154
|
+
## Technical Architecture Audit
|
|
155
|
+
## NVIDIA Alignment Audit
|
|
156
|
+
## Improvement Roadmap (prioritized, effort vs. impact)
|
|
157
|
+
## 90-Day Action Plan (Days 0–30 / 31–60 / 61–90, owners)
|
|
158
|
+
## Application Readiness Report (eligibility checklist + go/no-go)
|
|
159
|
+
```
|
|
160
|
+
|
|
161
|
+
Include the eligibility checklist explicitly (incorporated, website, business
|
|
162
|
+
email, ≥1 developer, <10 yrs, AI product not consulting, not in an excluded
|
|
163
|
+
category) and flag any blocker that would cause an automatic rejection.
|
|
164
|
+
|
|
165
|
+
## Quality bar
|
|
166
|
+
|
|
167
|
+
- Evidence over opinion: cite the accepted-startup patterns your scores rely on.
|
|
168
|
+
- Be specific and quantified; replace vague advice with concrete next actions.
|
|
169
|
+
- Brutally honest: if it's not ready, say so and explain exactly why.
|
|
170
|
+
- Recommend NVIDIA tech only where it authentically fits the product.
|
|
171
|
+
|
|
172
|
+
## Verification checklist (run before finishing)
|
|
173
|
+
|
|
174
|
+
1. `nvidia-inception/inception-readiness-report.md` exists with every section.
|
|
175
|
+
2. Category scores sum correctly to the 0–100 total; each has evidence.
|
|
176
|
+
3. Acceptance probability band matches the total score.
|
|
177
|
+
4. Eligibility checklist is complete; any auto-reject blocker is flagged.
|
|
178
|
+
5. Every recommendation is specific, prioritized, and actionable.
|
|
179
|
+
6. No invented facts — unknowns are marked `[UNKNOWN]`, not fabricated.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# nvidia-product-inventor
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
Reads your **existing startup-idea files** and invents **3–6 concrete products**
|
|
4
|
+
(not marketing copy) engineered to fit NVIDIA Inception. Each product gets a
|
|
5
|
+
short brandable name (**4–10 letters**) and an explicit NVIDIA stack —
|
|
6
|
+
**physical/compute hardware (GPUs, Jetson, DGX…) first**, then SDKs, then
|
|
7
|
+
software.
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
> Builds on **`nvidia-inception-idea-booster`** (preference levers) and
|
|
10
|
+
> **`nvidia-inception-starter`** (acceptance lens). Products only — no website
|
|
11
|
+
> or landing-page copy.
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
## Install
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
```bash
|
|
16
|
+
npx spirewise install -s nvidia-product-inventor # pick agents + scope
|
|
17
|
+
npx spirewise install -s nvidia-product-inventor -a claude,cursor -sc workspace
|
|
18
|
+
```
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
## Remove
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
```bash
|
|
23
|
+
npx spirewise remove -s nvidia-product-inventor # pick agents + scope
|
|
24
|
+
npx spirewise remove -s nvidia-product-inventor -a claude,cursor -sc both
|
|
25
|
+
```
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
(No Node? `./install.sh -s nvidia-product-inventor` and `./install.sh remove -s nvidia-product-inventor`.)
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
## Use
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
Put your idea notes anywhere in the project, then ask your agent:
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
> "Invent products for NVIDIA Inception from our idea"
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
It reads those files and writes a **`products_raw/`** folder with one subfolder
|
|
36
|
+
per product.
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
## Output
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
```
|
|
41
|
+
products_raw/
|
|
42
|
+
├── _overview.md # all products: name, letters, one-liner, primary GPU
|
|
43
|
+
├── <Product1>/
|
|
44
|
+
│ ├── product.md
|
|
45
|
+
│ ├── logo-brief.md
|
|
46
|
+
│ └── <Product1>-logo-1080x1080.png
|
|
47
|
+
├── <Product2>/…
|
|
48
|
+
└── … # 3–6 products total
|
|
49
|
+
```
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
Each `product.md` covers the problem, what it does, **why GPU compute is
|
|
52
|
+
essential**, the NVIDIA stack (hardware → SDKs → software), physical/edge angle,
|
|
53
|
+
moat, market, Inception fit, and MVP scope. Each product also ships a **real
|
|
54
|
+
1080×1080 PNG logo mark** (symbol only, centered) on a solid background.
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
## Rules it enforces
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
- **Same space only** — all products share the startup's industry, category, core
|
|
59
|
+
idea, and users (variations/components of the one idea), never new categories or
|
|
60
|
+
unrelated businesses.
|
|
61
|
+
- **3–6 products**, each in its own folder under `products_raw/`.
|
|
62
|
+
- Product names are **4–10 letters, letters only**, brandable; folder name = product name.
|
|
63
|
+
- NVIDIA stack ordered **physical/GPU first**, then SDKs, then software.
|
|
64
|
+
- Every product must genuinely need accelerated compute (no AI wrappers).
|
|
65
|
+
- Each product gets a **proper designed logo MARK** — 1080×1080 PNG, **mark/symbol
|
|
66
|
+
only and center-aligned** (no full wordmark or name text), **solid background**
|
|
67
|
+
(primary/white/black/other, no transparency or gradient), a monogram or custom
|
|
68
|
+
brand symbol (not an SVG/UI icon or emoji), saved in the product's folder.
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
See `SKILL.md` for the full method and the per-product template.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,205 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
name: nvidia-product-inventor
|
|
3
|
+
description: >-
|
|
4
|
+
Read a startup's existing idea/notes files and invent 3–6 concrete PRODUCTS
|
|
5
|
+
(not marketing copy) that all stay in the SAME industry, category, and core idea
|
|
6
|
+
as the startup — variations/components of the one idea, never new categories.
|
|
7
|
+
Each product is engineered to fit NVIDIA Inception preferences, gets a short
|
|
8
|
+
brandable name (4–10 letters), an explicit NVIDIA stack (physical/compute
|
|
9
|
+
hardware like GPUs first, then SDKs, then software), and a real 1080×1080 PNG
|
|
10
|
+
logo MARK (symbol only, centered, no wordmark) on a solid background. Use when the user asks to "invent products", "ideate
|
|
11
|
+
products for NVIDIA", "what should we build for Inception", or "turn our idea
|
|
12
|
+
into products". Writes a `products_raw/` folder with one subfolder per product.
|
|
13
|
+
Builds on nvidia-inception-idea-booster and nvidia-inception-starter. Products
|
|
14
|
+
only — no website/landing copy.
|
|
15
|
+
---
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
# NVIDIA Product Inventor
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
Turn the startup's idea into **3–6 buildable products** that maximize NVIDIA
|
|
20
|
+
Inception fit. This is a product/ideation skill — invent *what to build*, not
|
|
21
|
+
marketing copy.
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Uses the sibling skills
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
- Apply the **NVIDIA-preference levers** from `nvidia-inception-idea-booster`
|
|
26
|
+
(deep tech, physical/agentic AI, GPU-essential, defensibility, big market,
|
|
27
|
+
ecosystem fit) when shaping every product.
|
|
28
|
+
- Pre-screen each product with the **`nvidia-inception-starter`** acceptance lens
|
|
29
|
+
(AI strength, technical innovation, NVIDIA alignment, market, moat). Keep only
|
|
30
|
+
products that would plausibly score well; discard weak/"AI-wrapper" ones.
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
## Step 1 — Read the existing idea
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
Discover and read the startup files in the project: `idea*`, `README*`, `pitch*`,
|
|
35
|
+
`business-plan*`, `vision*`, `notes*`, `one-pager*`, `concept*`, `startup*`,
|
|
36
|
+
`docs/`, etc. Restate the problem, users, market, and any tech in your own words.
|
|
37
|
+
If too little exists, ask 3–5 focused questions first. Mark gaps `[UNKNOWN]` —
|
|
38
|
+
never fabricate. Stay anchored to the founder's domain and intent.
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
## Step 2 — Invent 3–6 products
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
## Step 2 — Invent 3–6 products (stay in the SAME space)
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
**Hard constraint — same space only.** Before inventing, lock the startup's
|
|
45
|
+
**industry, category, and core idea** from Step 1. Every product MUST stay inside
|
|
46
|
+
that exact space:
|
|
47
|
+
- Same **industry/vertical**, same **category**, same **core idea/problem space**,
|
|
48
|
+
same **target users**.
|
|
49
|
+
- Do **not** invent new categories, jump to a different industry, or generate
|
|
50
|
+
random/unrelated products. No "while we're at it" pivots.
|
|
51
|
+
- The 3–6 products are **variations, components, tiers, or adjacent features of
|
|
52
|
+
the one idea** — different angles on the same thing, not different businesses.
|
|
53
|
+
- If a concept only works by leaving the startup's space, drop it.
|
|
54
|
+
- State the locked space at the top of `_overview.md` and make every product
|
|
55
|
+
visibly trace back to it.
|
|
56
|
+
|
|
57
|
+
Generate **between 3 and 6** product concepts that each:
|
|
58
|
+
- Solve a sharp, real problem **within the startup's locked domain** (same idea,
|
|
59
|
+
same industry, same category).
|
|
60
|
+
- **Require GPU/accelerated compute** to exist (a must-have, not nice-to-have).
|
|
61
|
+
- Lean into **physical / edge / agentic AI** where credible.
|
|
62
|
+
- Have a defensible moat (proprietary data/model/hardware or NVIDIA integration).
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
### Product naming rules (enforce strictly)
|
|
65
|
+
- **4–10 letters**, letters only (A–Z), no spaces, digits, or symbols.
|
|
66
|
+
- Brandable and coined/short (e.g., `Vexel`, `Roboq`, `Synapt`, `Orbix`).
|
|
67
|
+
- Count the letters and confirm each name is within 4–10 before using it.
|
|
68
|
+
- The product folder name = the product name.
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
## NVIDIA stack for each product (order: physical → SDK → software)
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
List concrete, fitting choices — **lead with physical/compute hardware (GPUs)**:
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
1. **Physical / compute hardware (GPUs first):** data-center GPUs (H100, H200,
|
|
75
|
+
A100, GB200/Blackwell), workstation GPUs (RTX), **Jetson** (Orin/Nano) for
|
|
76
|
+
edge/robotics, **DGX** systems, **Grace Hopper / Grace Blackwell**, IGX/Holoscan
|
|
77
|
+
dev kits, robotics platforms on Jetson.
|
|
78
|
+
2. **SDKs / libraries:** CUDA, cuDNN, **TensorRT**, **Triton** Inference Server,
|
|
79
|
+
RAPIDS, **Isaac** (Sim / ROS / Lab) for robotics, **Omniverse** for
|
|
80
|
+
simulation/digital twins, **Metropolis** for vision, **Holoscan** for sensor/edge,
|
|
81
|
+
**NeMo** for LLMs, **Riva** for speech, DeepStream, cuOpt, Modulus, Parabricks
|
|
82
|
+
(genomics), Morpheus (cybersecurity), Maxine.
|
|
83
|
+
3. **Software / platforms:** **NVIDIA AI Enterprise**, **NIM** inference
|
|
84
|
+
microservices, NeMo framework/microservices, Omniverse Cloud, Fleet Command,
|
|
85
|
+
Base Command.
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
Pick only what authentically fits each product, and say *why* each piece is used.
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
## Output — `products_raw/` with one folder per product
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
1. Create `products_raw/` in the project root if missing.
|
|
92
|
+
2. For each product, create `products_raw/<ProductName>/` and write
|
|
93
|
+
`products_raw/<ProductName>/product.md`:
|
|
94
|
+
|
|
95
|
+
```
|
|
96
|
+
# <ProductName>
|
|
97
|
+
Letters: <n> (must be 4–10)
|
|
98
|
+
Tagline: <one line, what it is>
|
|
99
|
+
Generated: <YYYY-MM-DD>
|
|
100
|
+
|
|
101
|
+
## Same-space link
|
|
102
|
+
<one line: how this product is the SAME industry/category/core idea as the startup>
|
|
103
|
+
|
|
104
|
+
## Problem
|
|
105
|
+
## Target user
|
|
106
|
+
## What it does (product, not marketing)
|
|
107
|
+
## Why GPU / accelerated compute is essential
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
## NVIDIA Stack
|
|
110
|
+
### Physical / compute hardware (GPUs first)
|
|
111
|
+
- <GPU / Jetson / DGX / …> — <why>
|
|
112
|
+
### SDKs / libraries
|
|
113
|
+
- <CUDA / TensorRT / Isaac / Omniverse / …> — <why>
|
|
114
|
+
### Software / platforms
|
|
115
|
+
- <NVIDIA AI Enterprise / NIM / …> — <why>
|
|
116
|
+
|
|
117
|
+
## Physical AI / Edge angle (if applicable)
|
|
118
|
+
## Defensibility / moat
|
|
119
|
+
## Market & wedge
|
|
120
|
+
## Inception fit (1–2 lines: why this scores well)
|
|
121
|
+
## Build notes / MVP scope
|
|
122
|
+
## Logo (mark only) (see logo-brief.md + <ProductName>-logo-1080x1080.png)
|
|
123
|
+
## Open questions / [UNKNOWN]
|
|
124
|
+
```
|
|
125
|
+
|
|
126
|
+
3. Also write `products_raw/_overview.md` starting with the **locked space**
|
|
127
|
+
(industry, category, core idea, target users), then list every product: name,
|
|
128
|
+
letter count, one-liner, primary NVIDIA hardware, and its same-space link.
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
## Logo for each product (required)
|
|
131
|
+
|
|
132
|
+
## Logo MARK for each product (required)
|
|
133
|
+
|
|
134
|
+
Every product gets a **real, designed brand logo MARK** — the symbol only, not
|
|
135
|
+
the full logo. Do **not** include the full product name as a wordmark, no
|
|
136
|
+
tagline, no lockup. Just the **mark**, **center-aligned** on the canvas. It must
|
|
137
|
+
be a proper designed brand mark — not an SVG icon, UI/material icon, emoji, or
|
|
138
|
+
clip-art glyph.
|
|
139
|
+
|
|
140
|
+
### Design (research first)
|
|
141
|
+
- Briefly research 3–5 reference brand marks in the product's space; note the
|
|
142
|
+
visual conventions, then design something distinct (don't copy).
|
|
143
|
+
- The mark is **one of**: a **monogram/lettermark** (1–2 brand initials drawn as a
|
|
144
|
+
custom mark) or a **distinctive custom brand symbol** tied to the concept.
|
|
145
|
+
Ownable, memorable, simple, and scalable.
|
|
146
|
+
- Define a tiny brand spec: palette (hex), the mark concept, and (if a monogram)
|
|
147
|
+
the typographic treatment.
|
|
148
|
+
|
|
149
|
+
### Hard output rules
|
|
150
|
+
- Format **PNG**, exactly **1080 × 1080 px**.
|
|
151
|
+
- **Solid background** — a single flat color with NO transparency and NO gradient.
|
|
152
|
+
Use the brand **primary color**, or white, or black, or another solid color that
|
|
153
|
+
gives strong contrast with the mark. State the exact bg hex in the brief.
|
|
154
|
+
- **Mark only**, **center-aligned** both horizontally and vertically, sized large
|
|
155
|
+
with balanced safe padding — not a tiny icon on a big canvas, and not the full
|
|
156
|
+
name spelled out.
|
|
157
|
+
- Save it **inside that product's folder**:
|
|
158
|
+
`products_raw/<ProductName>/<ProductName>-logo-1080x1080.png`
|
|
159
|
+
- Also write `products_raw/<ProductName>/logo-brief.md` with: mark type
|
|
160
|
+
(monogram vs. symbol), concept, background hex, mark/accent hex, any typography,
|
|
161
|
+
and references consulted.
|
|
162
|
+
|
|
163
|
+
### How to generate it
|
|
164
|
+
1. **Preferred:** if an image-generation tool/model is available, prompt it for a
|
|
165
|
+
*professional brand logo mark / symbol* (specify: mark/symbol only — no text,
|
|
166
|
+
no wordmark — the concept, color palette, solid background, flat vector-style,
|
|
167
|
+
centered, no photographic texture), then ensure the saved file is a 1080×1080
|
|
168
|
+
PNG on a solid background with the mark centered.
|
|
169
|
+
2. **Fallback (always works):** render a deliberate brand mark programmatically —
|
|
170
|
+
e.g. Python + Pillow — drawing a custom monogram (1–2 initials) or geometric
|
|
171
|
+
symbol, centered on a solid-color 1080×1080 canvas. This must look designed
|
|
172
|
+
(composition, weight, balance), not like a stock icon. Verify dimensions, that
|
|
173
|
+
the mark is centered, and that the background is fully solid.
|
|
174
|
+
|
|
175
|
+
Do **not** ship: full wordmarks/the spelled-out name, taglines, transparent PNGs,
|
|
176
|
+
gradients, generic icon-font glyphs, stock
|
|
177
|
+
emoji, or screenshots. One clean, centered brand **mark** per product.
|
|
178
|
+
|
|
179
|
+
## Quality bar
|
|
180
|
+
|
|
181
|
+
- **Same space only.** All products share the startup's industry, category, core
|
|
182
|
+
idea, and users — variations/components/tiers of the one idea, never new
|
|
183
|
+
categories or unrelated businesses.
|
|
184
|
+
- **Products, not copy.** No website/landing/marketing text — concrete product
|
|
185
|
+
concepts and technical plans only.
|
|
186
|
+
- Every product must be GPU-essential and NVIDIA-aligned, with the stack ordered
|
|
187
|
+
physical → SDK → software.
|
|
188
|
+
- Names obey the 4–10 letter rule (verified) and folder names match.
|
|
189
|
+
- Stay within the founder's domain; elevate, don't fabricate.
|
|
190
|
+
|
|
191
|
+
## Verification checklist (run before finishing)
|
|
192
|
+
|
|
193
|
+
1. Read the existing idea files; locked the startup's industry, category, core idea.
|
|
194
|
+
2. **All 3–6 products stay in that same space** — no new categories or unrelated
|
|
195
|
+
ideas — and each `product.md` has a "Same-space link" tracing back to it.
|
|
196
|
+
3. `products_raw/` exists with **3–6** product subfolders, each with `product.md`.
|
|
197
|
+
4. Every product name is **4–10 letters, letters only**, and matches its folder.
|
|
198
|
+
5. Each product lists NVIDIA hardware (GPU/physical) first, then SDKs, then software.
|
|
199
|
+
6. Each product justifies why GPU/accelerated compute is essential.
|
|
200
|
+
7. `products_raw/_overview.md` opens with the locked space, then summarizes all products.
|
|
201
|
+
8. Every product folder has a **1080×1080 PNG logo MARK on a solid
|
|
202
|
+
(non-transparent, non-gradient) background**, the **mark centered** with no full
|
|
203
|
+
wordmark/name text, plus `logo-brief.md` — a real monogram or custom symbol,
|
|
204
|
+
not an SVG/UI icon or emoji. Verify dimensions and that the mark is centered.
|
|
205
|
+
9. No marketing/website copy; unknowns marked `[UNKNOWN]`, not invented.
|