spine-framework 0.3.145 → 0.4.1

package/.framework/tests/unit/principal-cache.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,138 @@
+// CIL[BEGIN stable_id="~/.framework/tests/unit/principal-cache.test.ts:module_header:module_header" type="module_header" identity="module_header" parent="none"]
+// CIL[DOC-MACRO purpose="Unit tests for the human principal cache placement guard"]
+// CIL[DOC-RESPONSIBILITY responsibility="Verify principals missing both account_id and role_id (mid-registration) are never cached, while placed principals and account-scoped contacts cache normally"]
+// CIL[DOC-CONTEXT module="tests/unit/principal-cache" layer="test-unit" related_files=".framework/functions/_shared/principal.ts,.framework/migrations/052_registration_security.sql"]
+// CIL[DOC-CONTRACT inputs="none" outputs="vitest assertions" errors="none" side_effects="Mocks @supabase/supabase-js createClient and db module"]
+// CIL[DOC-MICRO logic_summary="Drives resolvePrincipal with Bearer tokens while toggling the mocked people row between unplaced and placed states; asserts re-resolution instead of stale cache replay" notable_decisions="Regression coverage for the ~60s 'Account context required' stall documented in app install docs"]
+// CIL[DOC-CONFIDENCE pass="first" score="0.85" flags="none"]
+// CIL[DOC-STABILITY stability="stable"]
+// CIL[DOC-AUDIENCE audience="test-engineers"]
+import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
+
+const { mockGetUser, mockPeopleSingle, mockPersonByAuthUid } = vi.hoisted(() => ({
+  mockGetUser: vi.fn(),
+  mockPeopleSingle: vi.fn(),
+  mockPersonByAuthUid: vi.fn(),
+}))
+
+vi.mock('@supabase/supabase-js', () => ({
+  createClient: vi.fn(() => ({
+    auth: { getUser: mockGetUser },
+  })),
+}))
+
+vi.mock('../../functions/_shared/db.ts', () => ({
+  adminDb: {
+    from: vi.fn(() => ({
+      select: vi.fn(() => ({
+        eq: vi.fn(() => ({ maybeSingle: mockPersonByAuthUid })),
+      })),
+    })),
+    rpc: vi.fn(),
+  },
+  getUserDb: vi.fn(() => ({
+    from: vi.fn(() => ({
+      select: vi.fn(() => ({
+        eq: vi.fn(() => ({ single: mockPeopleSingle })),
+      })),
+    })),
+  })),
+}))
+
+import { resolvePrincipal } from '../../functions/_shared/principal.ts'
+// CIL[DOC-VECTOR type="context" content="purpose='Unit tests for the human principal cache placement guard'; No verified external callers; imports: .framework/functions/_shared/principal.ts" status="ready"]
+
+const event = (token: string) => ({
+  headers: { authorization: `Bearer ${token}`, 'user-agent': 'vitest' },
+})
+
+const authUser = { id: 'auth-1', email: 'new-user@example.com' }
+
+function setPerson(person: any) {
+  mockPeopleSingle.mockResolvedValue({ data: person, error: null })
+}
+
+beforeEach(() => {
+  vi.clearAllMocks()
+  mockGetUser.mockResolvedValue({ data: { user: authUser }, error: null })
+  mockPersonByAuthUid.mockResolvedValue({ data: { id: 'person-1' } })
+})
+
+describe('resolvePrincipal human cache — mid-registration guard', () => {
+  it('does not cache a principal with both account_id and role_id null', async () => {
+    // First call lands mid-registration (placement RPC has not run yet).
+    setPerson({
+      id: 'person-1',
+      email: authUser.email,
+      account_id: null,
+      role_id: null,
+      role: null,
+    })
+    const first = await resolvePrincipal(event('tok-unplaced'))
+    expect(first.type).toBe('human')
+    expect(first.accountId).toBeNull()
+
+    // Placement commits — same token must re-resolve and see the account.
+    setPerson({
+      id: 'person-1',
+      email: authUser.email,
+      account_id: 'acct-1',
+      role_id: 'role-1',
+      role: { id: 'role-1', slug: 'member_admin', name: 'Admin', is_system: false, permissions: [] },
+    })
+    const second = await resolvePrincipal(event('tok-unplaced'))
+    expect(second.accountId).toBe('acct-1')
+    expect(second.roles).toEqual(['member_admin'])
+    expect(mockPeopleSingle).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(2)
+  })
+
+  it('caches a fully placed principal on subsequent requests', async () => {
+    setPerson({
+      id: 'person-1',
+      email: authUser.email,
+      account_id: 'acct-1',
+      role_id: 'role-1',
+      role: { id: 'role-1', slug: 'member', name: 'Member', is_system: false, permissions: [] },
+    })
+    const first = await resolvePrincipal(event('tok-placed'))
+    expect(first.accountId).toBe('acct-1')
+
+    // Second call must hit the cache — the people lookup is not repeated.
+    setPerson({
+      id: 'person-1',
+      email: authUser.email,
+      account_id: 'acct-changed',
+      role_id: 'role-1',
+      role: { id: 'role-1', slug: 'member', name: 'Member', is_system: false, permissions: [] },
+    })
+    const second = await resolvePrincipal(event('tok-placed'))
+    expect(second.accountId).toBe('acct-1')
+    expect(mockPeopleSingle).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
+  })
+
+  it('caches an account-scoped contact that has no role', async () => {
+    // Directory contacts legitimately have account_id without role_id —
+    // the both-null guard must not skip caching for this steady state.
+    setPerson({
+      id: 'person-1',
+      email: authUser.email,
+      account_id: 'acct-1',
+      role_id: null,
+      role: null,
+    })
+    const first = await resolvePrincipal(event('tok-contact'))
+    expect(first.accountId).toBe('acct-1')
+
+    setPerson({
+      id: 'person-1',
+      email: authUser.email,
+      account_id: 'acct-other',
+      role_id: null,
+      role: null,
+    })
+    const second = await resolvePrincipal(event('tok-contact'))
+    expect(second.accountId).toBe('acct-1')
+    expect(mockPeopleSingle).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1)
+  })
+})
+// CIL[END stable_id="~/.framework/tests/unit/principal-cache.test.ts:module_header:module_header"]

package/.framework/tests/unit/retrieval-golden.test.ts

@@ -0,0 +1,520 @@
+// CIL[BEGIN stable_id="~/.framework/tests/unit/retrieval-golden.test.ts:module_header:module_header" type="module_header" identity="module_header" parent="none"]
+// CIL[DOC-MACRO purpose="Golden retrieval contract — pins retrieveKnowledge's observable result set (order, ids, similarity, lexical flags, scope filtering) so latency optimizations can never silently alter ranking or eligibility"]
+// CIL[DOC-RESPONSIBILITY responsibility="Snapshot the exact doc lists, mean similarity computation, RRF fusion ordering, security/item-type/source filtering, and denied paths for a fixed mock corpus"]
+// CIL[DOC-CONTEXT module="tests/unit/retrieval-golden" layer="test-unit" related_files=".framework/functions/_shared/agent-runner.ts,.framework/functions/_shared/kb.ts"]
+// CIL[DOC-CONTRACT inputs="none" outputs="assertions on retrieveKnowledge return shape" errors="none" side_effects="none"]
+// CIL[DOC-MICRO logic_summary="Synchronous mock harness (no deferreds) — apps/envelope, embeddings lexical rows, match_embeddings per vector type, items hydration; asserts exact document_id ordering and similarity/meanSimilarity values so perf refactors must produce byte-equivalent result sets"]
+// CIL[DOC-CONFIDENCE pass="first" score="0.9" flags="none"]
+// CIL[DOC-STABILITY stability="stable"]
+// CIL[DOC-AUDIENCE audience="framework maintainers"]
+import { describe, it, expect, vi, beforeEach } from 'vitest'
+import type { CoreContext } from '../../functions/_shared/middleware.ts'
+
+vi.mock('../../functions/_shared/db.ts', () => ({
+  adminDb: { from: vi.fn(), rpc: vi.fn() }
+}))
+vi.mock('../../functions/_shared/audit.ts', () => ({
+  emitAudit: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
+  emitLog: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
+  emitSpan: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined)
+}))
+vi.mock('../../functions/_shared/outcomes.ts', () => ({
+  emitOutcome: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined)
+}))
+vi.mock('../../functions/_shared/llm.ts', () => ({
+  callOpenAIChat: vi.fn(),
+  callOpenAIEmbeddings: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue({ data: [{ embedding: [0.1, 0.2, 0.3] }] })
+}))
+vi.mock('../../functions/admin-data.ts', () => ({ create: vi.fn() }))
+vi.mock('../../functions/integration-outbound.ts', () => ({ execute: vi.fn() }))
+vi.mock('../../functions/_shared/pipeline-runner.ts', () => ({ runPipeline: vi.fn() }))
+vi.mock('../../functions/_shared/funnel.ts', () => ({
+  emitSignal: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(undefined),
+  accountDataFlag: vi.fn().mockResolvedValue(false)
+}))
+
+import { adminDb } from '../../functions/_shared/db.ts'
+import { retrieveKnowledge, executeToolAction, computeEvidenceState, hasInRangeCitationMarker, ensureInlineCitations } from '../../functions/_shared/agent-runner.ts'
+import { callOpenAIEmbeddings } from '../../functions/_shared/llm.ts'
+
+function makeCtx(overrides: Partial<CoreContext> = {}): CoreContext {
+  return {
+    principal: { id: 'person-1', type: 'human', accountId: 'acct-1', roles: ['member'] },
+    accountId: 'acct-1',
+    requestId: 'req-test',
+    ...overrides
+  } as CoreContext
+}
+
+// ─── Fixture corpus ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
+// IDs are real-shaped UUIDs so hydration goes through the uuid branch.
+const DOC = {
+  strong: '11111111-1111-4111-8111-111111111111',
+  mid:    '22222222-2222-4222-8222-222222222222',
+  weak:   '33333333-3333-4333-8333-333333333333',
+  restricted: '44444444-4444-4444-8444-444444444444',
+  otherAcct:  '55555555-5555-4555-8555-555555555555',
+  lexicalOnly: '66666666-6666-4666-8666-666666666666',
+}
+
+const ITEM_ROWS = [
+  { id: DOC.strong, title: 'Strong Article', data: { content: 'Full body of the strong article' } },
+  { id: DOC.mid, title: 'Mid Article', data: {} },
+  { id: DOC.weak, title: 'Weak Article', data: {} },
+  { id: DOC.restricted, title: 'Restricted Doc', data: {} },
+  { id: DOC.otherAcct, title: 'Other Acct Doc', data: {} },
+  { id: DOC.lexicalOnly, title: 'Lexical Only', data: {} },
+]
+
+function vectorRow(id: string, similarity: number, opts: {
+  vectorType?: string, itemType?: string, security?: string, accountId?: string, content?: string
+} = {}) {
+  return {
+    document_id: id,
+    content: opts.content ?? `content for ${id}`,
+    metadata: {
+      item_type: opts.itemType ?? 'kb_article',
+      vector_type: opts.vectorType ?? 'semantic',
+      ...(opts.security ? { security_level: opts.security } : {}),
+    },
+    similarity,
+    account_id: opts.accountId ?? 'acct-1',
+  }
+}
+
+// Mock wiring: apps returns the envelope; embeddings returns lexical rows via
+// textSearch; match_embeddings returns rows keyed on filter_vector_type;
+// items hydrates document ids.
+function setupRetrieval(opts: {
+  envelope?: any
+  appsError?: any
+  vectorRows?: Record<string, any[]> // keyed by vector_type
+  lexicalRows?: any[]
+  lexicalError?: any
+  items?: any[]
+} = {}) {
+  // envelope: undefined → default {account:true}; null → config.knowledge absent; {} → empty envelope
+  const envelope = opts.envelope === undefined ? { account: true } : opts.envelope
+  vi.mocked(adminDb.from).mockImplementation((table: string) => {
+    if (table === 'apps') {
+      const q: any = {
+        select: vi.fn(() => q), eq: vi.fn(() => q),
+        maybeSingle: vi.fn(() => Promise.resolve(
+          opts.appsError
+            ? { data: null, error: opts.appsError }
+            : { data: { id: 'app-1', slug: 'test-app', required_roles: [], config: envelope === null ? {} : { knowledge: envelope } }, error: null }
+        )),
+      }
+      return q
+    }
+    if (table === 'accounts') {
+      const q: any = {
+        select: vi.fn(() => q), eq: vi.fn(() => q),
+        maybeSingle: vi.fn(() => Promise.resolve({ data: { id: 'sys-acct' }, error: null })),
+      }
+      return q
+    }
+    if (table === 'embeddings') {
+      const q: any = {
+        select: vi.fn(() => q), in: vi.fn(() => q), is: vi.fn(() => q),
+        not: vi.fn(() => q), or: vi.fn(() => q), textSearch: vi.fn(() => q),
+        limit: vi.fn(() => q),
+        then: (onF: any, onR: any) => Promise.resolve(
+          opts.lexicalError ? { data: null, error: opts.lexicalError } : { data: opts.lexicalRows ?? [], error: null }
+        ).then(onF, onR),
+      }
+      return q
+    }
+    if (table === 'items') {
+      const q: any = {
+        select: vi.fn(() => q),
+        in: vi.fn((_field: string, ids: any[]) =>
+          Promise.resolve({ data: (opts.items ?? ITEM_ROWS).filter((i) => ids.includes(i.id)), error: null })),
+      }
+      return q
+    }
+    return {} as any
+  })
+  vi.mocked(adminDb.rpc).mockImplementation((name: string, args: any) => {
+    if (name !== 'match_embeddings') return Promise.resolve({ data: null, error: null }) as any
+    const rows = opts.vectorRows?.[args?.filter_vector_type] ?? []
+    return Promise.resolve({ data: rows, error: null }) as any
+  })
+}
+
+function lexicalRow(id: string, opts: { itemType?: string; accountId?: string } = {}) {
+  return {
+    document_id: id,
+    content: `lexical content for ${id}`,
+    metadata: { item_type: opts.itemType ?? 'kb_article' },
+    account_id: opts.accountId ?? 'acct-1',
+  }
+}
+
+const POLICY = { vector_types: ['semantic'] }
+const APP = 'test-app'
+
+describe('retrieveKnowledge — golden result sets', () => {
+  beforeEach(() => vi.clearAllMocks())
+
+  it('orders by RRF-fused rank: vector+lexical hit beats single-source hits', async () => {
+    setupRetrieval({
+      vectorRows: { semantic: [vectorRow(DOC.strong, 0.9), vectorRow(DOC.mid, 0.6)] },
+      lexicalRows: [lexicalRow(DOC.strong), lexicalRow(DOC.lexicalOnly)],
+    })
+    const { docs } = await retrieveKnowledge('query', [], 'acct-1', POLICY, makeCtx(), APP)
+    const ids = docs.map((d: any) => d.document_id)
+    // strong: vector#0 + lexical#0 → 2/(61). mid: vector#1 → 1/62.
+    // lexicalOnly: lexical#1 → 1/62. mid vs lexicalOnly tie on score — order
+    // by insertion (mid inserted first via vector list).
+    expect(ids).toEqual([DOC.strong, DOC.mid, DOC.lexicalOnly])
+    expect(docs.find((d: any) => d.document_id === DOC.strong).matched_lexically).toBe(true)
+    expect(docs.find((d: any) => d.document_id === DOC.mid).matched_lexically).toBe(false)
+    expect(docs.find((d: any) => d.document_id === DOC.lexicalOnly).matched_lexically).toBe(true)
+  })
+
+  it('computes meanSimilarity over top-3 RRF docs that have similarity > 0 (lexical-only excluded)', async () => {
+    setupRetrieval({
+      vectorRows: { semantic: [vectorRow(DOC.strong, 0.9), vectorRow(DOC.mid, 0.6)] },
+      lexicalRows: [lexicalRow(DOC.strong), lexicalRow(DOC.lexicalOnly)],
+    })
+    const { meanSimilarity } = await retrieveKnowledge('query', [], 'acct-1', POLICY, makeCtx(), APP)
+    expect(meanSimilarity).toBeCloseTo((0.9 + 0.6) / 2, 6)
+  })
+
+  it('drops rows below the 0.15 similarity floor and restricted rows from other accounts', async () => {
+    setupRetrieval({
+      vectorRows: {
+        semantic: [
+          vectorRow(DOC.strong, 0.9),
+          vectorRow(DOC.weak, 0.10),                                    // below floor
+          vectorRow(DOC.restricted, 0.95, { security: 'restricted', accountId: 'acct-other' }),
+        ],
+      },
+      lexicalRows: [],
+    })
+    const { docs } = await retrieveKnowledge('query', [], 'acct-1', POLICY, makeCtx(), APP)
+    expect(docs.map((d: any) => d.document_id)).toEqual([DOC.strong])
+  })
+
+  it('honors max_security_level — absent security_level defaults to internal, so external-only excludes it', async () => {
+    setupRetrieval({
+      vectorRows: {
+        semantic: [
+          vectorRow(DOC.strong, 0.9),                                                    // internal — excluded at 'external'
+          vectorRow(DOC.lexicalOnly, 0.8, { security: 'external' }),                     // allowed
+          vectorRow(DOC.mid, 0.95, { security: 'restricted', accountId: 'acct-1' }),     // own restricted — still excluded
+        ],
+      },
+      lexicalRows: [],
+    })
+    const { docs } = await retrieveKnowledge(
+      'query', [], 'acct-1', { ...POLICY, max_security_level: 'external' }, makeCtx(), APP)
+    expect(docs.map((d: any) => d.document_id)).toEqual([DOC.lexicalOnly])
+  })
+
+  it('max_security_level internal admits internal + external but not restricted', async () => {
+    setupRetrieval({
+      vectorRows: {
+        semantic: [
+          vectorRow(DOC.strong, 0.9),                                                    // default internal — allowed
+          vectorRow(DOC.mid, 0.95, { security: 'restricted', accountId: 'acct-1' }),     // own restricted — excluded
+        ],
+      },
+      lexicalRows: [],
+    })
+    const { docs } = await retrieveKnowledge('query', [], 'acct-1', POLICY, makeCtx(), APP)
+    expect(docs.map((d: any) => d.document_id)).toEqual([DOC.strong])
+  })
+
+  it('scopes to knowledge_sources pick when provided', async () => {
+    setupRetrieval({
+      vectorRows: { semantic: [vectorRow(DOC.strong, 0.9), vectorRow(DOC.mid, 0.8)] },
+      lexicalRows: [],
+    })
+    const { docs } = await retrieveKnowledge('query', [DOC.strong], 'acct-1', POLICY, makeCtx(), APP)
+    expect(docs.map((d: any) => d.document_id)).toEqual([DOC.strong])
+  })
+
+  it('returns empty + zero mean when nothing matches (no-result query)', async () => {
+    setupRetrieval({ vectorRows: { semantic: [] }, lexicalRows: [] })
+    const res = await retrieveKnowledge('zzzz no matches', [], 'acct-1', POLICY, makeCtx(), APP)
+    expect(res.docs).toEqual([])
+    expect(res.meanSimilarity).toBe(0)
+  })
+
+  it('survives lexical failure — vector results still return', async () => {
+    setupRetrieval({
+      vectorRows: { semantic: [vectorRow(DOC.strong, 0.9)] },
+      lexicalError: { message: 'fts error' },
+    })
+    const { docs } = await retrieveKnowledge('query', [], 'acct-1', POLICY, makeCtx(), APP)
+    expect(docs.map((d: any) => d.document_id)).toEqual([DOC.strong])
+  })
+
+  it('survives vector/embedding failure — lexical results still return', async () => {
+    const { callOpenAIEmbeddings } = await import('../../functions/_shared/llm.ts')
+    vi.mocked(callOpenAIEmbeddings).mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error('embed fail'))
+    setupRetrieval({ lexicalRows: [lexicalRow(DOC.lexicalOnly)] })
+    const { docs } = await retrieveKnowledge('query', [], 'acct-1', POLICY, makeCtx(), APP)
+    expect(docs.map((d: any) => d.document_id)).toEqual([DOC.lexicalOnly])
+    expect(docs[0].matched_lexically).toBe(true)
+  })
+
+  it('denies when the app has a knowledge key permitting no corpora (empty envelope)', async () => {
+    setupRetrieval({ envelope: {} })
+    const res = await retrieveKnowledge('query', [], 'acct-1', POLICY, makeCtx(), APP)
+    expect(res.docs).toEqual([])
+    expect(res.denied).toBe(true)
+    expect(res.deniedReason).toContain('empty_scope')
+  })
+
+  it('denies when the app declares no knowledge envelope at all', async () => {
+    // config.knowledge absent entirely — stronger deny reason
+    setupRetrieval({ envelope: null })
+    const res = await retrieveKnowledge('query', [], 'acct-1', POLICY, makeCtx(), APP)
+    expect(res.docs).toEqual([])
+    expect(res.denied).toBe(true)
+    expect(res.deniedReason).toContain('no_knowledge_envelope')
+  })
+
+  it('multi-vector-type: merges channels, dedupes by document_id keeping max similarity', async () => {
+    setupRetrieval({
+      vectorRows: {
+        semantic: [
+          vectorRow(DOC.strong, 0.7, { vectorType: 'semantic', content: 'SEMANTIC body for strong' }),
+          vectorRow(DOC.mid, 0.6, { vectorType: 'semantic' }),
+        ],
+        title:    [
+          vectorRow(DOC.strong, 0.95, { vectorType: 'title', content: 'TITLE string only' }),
+          vectorRow(DOC.weak, 0.5, { vectorType: 'title' }),
+        ],
+      },
+      lexicalRows: [],
+      // Items without data.content so the title→non-title content swap is
+      // observable (full-document expansion would otherwise overwrite it).
+      items: [
+        { id: DOC.strong, title: 'Strong Article', data: {} },
+        { id: DOC.mid, title: 'Mid Article', data: {} },
+        { id: DOC.weak, title: 'Weak Article', data: {} },
+      ],
+    })
+    const { docs } = await retrieveKnowledge('query', [], 'acct-1', { vector_types: ['semantic', 'title'] }, makeCtx(), APP)
+    const strong = docs.find((d: any) => d.document_id === DOC.strong)
+    expect(strong.similarity).toBe(0.95)            // max across channels
+    // Title match swaps in the semantic channel's body content
+    expect(strong.content).toContain('SEMANTIC body for strong')
+    expect(docs.map((d: any) => d.document_id)).toEqual([DOC.strong, DOC.mid, DOC.weak])
+  })
+
+  it('envelope item_types restrict results even when the RPC returns them', async () => {
+    setupRetrieval({
+      envelope: { account: { item_types: ['kb_article'] } },
+      vectorRows: {
+        semantic: [
+          vectorRow(DOC.strong, 0.9, { itemType: 'kb_article' }),
+          vectorRow(DOC.mid, 0.95, { itemType: 'secret_doc' }),  // outside envelope types
+        ],
+      },
+      lexicalRows: [],
+    })
+    const { docs } = await retrieveKnowledge('query', [], 'acct-1', POLICY, makeCtx(), APP)
+    expect(docs.map((d: any) => d.document_id)).toEqual([DOC.strong])
+  })
+
+  it('hydrates titles and expands full document body for small articles', async () => {
+    setupRetrieval({
+      vectorRows: { semantic: [vectorRow(DOC.strong, 0.9)] },
+      lexicalRows: [],
+    })
+    const { docs } = await retrieveKnowledge('query', [], 'acct-1', POLICY, makeCtx(), APP)
+    expect(docs[0].title).toBe('Strong Article')
+    expect(docs[0].content).toBe('Full body of the strong article')
+    expect(docs[0].full_document).toBe(true)
+  })
+})
+
+
+// ─── Episode-scoped retrieval cache (P1) ─────────────────────────────────────
+// search_knowledge tool calls keyed by normalized query + policy + scope reuse
+// the hydrated docs already fetched for this episode — identical identity hits,
+// reformulated queries miss by design.
+describe('episode retrieval cache — search_knowledge', () => {
+  beforeEach(() => vi.clearAllMocks())
+
+  const toolAction = { handler: 'search_knowledge' }
+
+  it('second identical query returns cached docs without a new embed/search', async () => {
+    setupRetrieval({
+      vectorRows: { semantic: [vectorRow(DOC.strong, 0.9), vectorRow(DOC.mid, 0.7)] },
+      lexicalRows: [],
+    })
+    const cache: Record<string, any> = {}
+    const ctx = makeCtx({ appId: APP } as any)
+    const runCtx = { retrievalCache: cache }
+
+    const r1 = await executeToolAction(toolAction, { query: 'what is cil', limit: 5 }, ctx, runCtx)
+    const embedsAfterFirst = vi.mocked(callOpenAIEmbeddings).mock.calls.length
+    const rpcAfterFirst = vi.mocked(adminDb.rpc).mock.calls.length
+    expect(r1.results.map((d: any) => d.document_id)).toEqual([DOC.strong, DOC.mid])
+    expect(r1.cached).toBeUndefined()
+
+    const r2 = await executeToolAction(toolAction, { query: 'what is cil', limit: 5 }, ctx, runCtx)
+    expect(r2.results.map((d: any) => d.document_id)).toEqual([DOC.strong, DOC.mid])
+    expect(r2.cached).toBe(true)
+    expect(vi.mocked(callOpenAIEmbeddings).mock.calls.length).toBe(embedsAfterFirst)
+    expect(vi.mocked(adminDb.rpc).mock.calls.length).toBe(rpcAfterFirst)
+  })
+
+  it('normalization: case/whitespace variants of the same query hit', async () => {
+    setupRetrieval({
+      vectorRows: { semantic: [vectorRow(DOC.strong, 0.9)] },
+      lexicalRows: [],
+    })
+    const cache: Record<string, any> = {}
+    const ctx = makeCtx({ appId: APP } as any)
+    const runCtx = { retrievalCache: cache }
+
+    await executeToolAction(toolAction, { query: 'what is cil' }, ctx, runCtx)
+    const embeds = vi.mocked(callOpenAIEmbeddings).mock.calls.length
+
+    const r = await executeToolAction(toolAction, { query: '  What  Is   CIL ' }, ctx, runCtx)
+    expect(r.cached).toBe(true)
+    expect(vi.mocked(callOpenAIEmbeddings).mock.calls.length).toBe(embeds)
+  })
+
+  it('a reformulated query is a deliberate miss — real retrieval runs', async () => {
+    setupRetrieval({
+      vectorRows: { semantic: [vectorRow(DOC.strong, 0.9)] },
+      lexicalRows: [],
+    })
+    const cache: Record<string, any> = {}
+    const ctx = makeCtx({ appId: APP } as any)
+    const runCtx = { retrievalCache: cache }
+
+    await executeToolAction(toolAction, { query: 'what is cil' }, ctx, runCtx)
+    const embeds = vi.mocked(callOpenAIEmbeddings).mock.calls.length
+
+    const r = await executeToolAction(toolAction, { query: 'code intelligence layer markers' }, ctx, runCtx)
+    expect(r.cached).toBeUndefined()
+    expect(vi.mocked(callOpenAIEmbeddings).mock.calls.length).toBeGreaterThan(embeds)
+    // …and that second query is now cached too
+    const r2 = await executeToolAction(toolAction, { query: 'code intelligence layer markers' }, ctx, runCtx)
+    expect(r2.cached).toBe(true)
+  })
+
+  it('policy difference (vector_types) produces a different key → miss', async () => {
+    setupRetrieval({
+      vectorRows: {
+        semantic: [vectorRow(DOC.strong, 0.9)],
+        title: [vectorRow(DOC.mid, 0.8, { vectorType: 'title' })],
+      },
+      lexicalRows: [],
+    })
+    const cache: Record<string, any> = {}
+    const ctx = makeCtx({ appId: APP } as any)
+    const semanticCtx = {
+      retrievalCache: cache,
+      config: { promptConfig: { metadata: { retrieval_policy: { vector_types: ['semantic'] } } }, agent: {} },
+    }
+    const titleCtx = {
+      retrievalCache: cache,
+      config: { promptConfig: { metadata: { retrieval_policy: { vector_types: ['title'] } } }, agent: {} },
+    }
+    await executeToolAction(toolAction, { query: 'q' }, ctx, semanticCtx as any)
+    const embeds = vi.mocked(callOpenAIEmbeddings).mock.calls.length
+    const r = await executeToolAction(toolAction, { query: 'q' }, ctx, titleCtx as any)
+    expect(r.cached).toBeUndefined()
+    expect(vi.mocked(callOpenAIEmbeddings).mock.calls.length).toBeGreaterThan(embeds)
+    expect(r.results.map((d: any) => d.document_id)).toEqual([DOC.mid])
+  })
+
+  it('denied results are cached and replay the denial, not an empty success', async () => {
+    setupRetrieval({ envelope: null }) // no knowledge envelope → denied
+    const cache: Record<string, any> = {}
+    const ctx = makeCtx({ appId: APP } as any)
+    const runCtx = { retrievalCache: cache }
+
+    const r1 = await executeToolAction(toolAction, { query: 'q' }, ctx, runCtx)
+    expect(r1.error).toContain('knowledge_denied')
+    const embeds = vi.mocked(callOpenAIEmbeddings).mock.calls.length
+
+    const r2 = await executeToolAction(toolAction, { query: 'q' }, ctx, runCtx)
+    expect(r2.error).toContain('knowledge_denied')
+    expect(r2.cached).toBe(true)
+    expect(vi.mocked(callOpenAIEmbeddings).mock.calls.length).toBe(embeds)
+  })
+
+  it('limit slices post-cache — different limits share one entry', async () => {
+    setupRetrieval({
+      vectorRows: { semantic: [vectorRow(DOC.strong, 0.9), vectorRow(DOC.mid, 0.7)] },
+      lexicalRows: [],
+    })
+    const cache: Record<string, any> = {}
+    const ctx = makeCtx({ appId: APP } as any)
+    const runCtx = { retrievalCache: cache }
+
+    const r1 = await executeToolAction(toolAction, { query: 'q', limit: 1 }, ctx, runCtx)
+    expect(r1.results).toHaveLength(1)
+    const r2 = await executeToolAction(toolAction, { query: 'q', limit: 5 }, ctx, runCtx)
+    expect(r2.cached).toBe(true)
+    expect(r2.results).toHaveLength(2)
+  })
+})
+
+
+// ─── Evidence-state recalibration + citation proof (P6) ──────────────────────
+// evidence_found requires aggregate mean >= 0.35 OR a decisive top hit >= 0.5 —
+// a paraphrased query that puts the right article at rank 1 with a noisy tail
+// must not read 'incomplete'. And any evidence_found answer must carry a
+// resolvable [n] marker; citation repair runs before the gate.
+describe('computeEvidenceState — top-hit path', () => {
+  const doc = (similarity: number) => ({ document_id: 'x', similarity })
+
+  it('strong top hit + weak tail → evidence_found (the paraphrase case)', () => {
+    const docs = [doc(0.62), doc(0.22), doc(0.18), doc(0.15)]
+    const mean = 0.29 // (0.62+0.22+0.18+0.15)/4 — below 0.35
+    expect(computeEvidenceState(docs, mean)).toBe('evidence_found')
+  })
+
+  it('strong mean still passes without a top hit', () => {
+    const docs = [doc(0.4), doc(0.38), doc(0.3)]
+    expect(computeEvidenceState(docs, 0.36)).toBe('evidence_found')
+  })
+
+  it('all-weak results stay incomplete', () => {
+    const docs = [doc(0.3), doc(0.25), doc(0.2)]
+    expect(computeEvidenceState(docs, 0.25)).toBe('incomplete')
+  })
+
+  it('a lone top hit below the decisive bar is still incomplete', () => {
+    const docs = [doc(0.45), doc(0.2), doc(0.18)]
+    expect(computeEvidenceState(docs, 0.27)).toBe('incomplete')
+  })
+
+  it('no docs → not_established', () => {
+    expect(computeEvidenceState([], 0)).toBe('not_established')
+    expect(computeEvidenceState(undefined, 0)).toBe('not_established')
+  })
+})
+
+describe('citation proof — hasInRangeCitationMarker + ensureInlineCitations', () => {
+  const sources = [{ document_id: 'a' }, { document_id: 'b' }]
+
+  it('an in-range marker is proof', () => {
+    expect(hasInRangeCitationMarker('The answer is X [1].', 2)).toBe(true)
+  })
+
+  it('out-of-range markers are not proof', () => {
+    expect(hasInRangeCitationMarker('See [9] for details.', 2)).toBe(false)
+  })
+
+  it('no markers is not proof (unlike extractCitedSources fallback)', () => {
+    expect(hasInRangeCitationMarker('A plain answer with no citations.', 2)).toBe(false)
+  })
+
+  it('ensureInlineCitations repair produces a provable marker', () => {
+    const repaired = ensureInlineCitations('A grounded answer with no markers.', sources)
+    expect(hasInRangeCitationMarker(repaired, sources.length)).toBe(true)
+  })
+})