specweave 2.3.0 → 3.0.1

package/dist/src/core/skills/skill-judge.js

@@ -1,671 +0,0 @@
-/**
- * Skill Judge - LLM-as-Judge for validating skill/agent output quality
- *
- * Uses Opus model for deep semantic analysis of code quality, spec alignment,
- * and best practices. Includes timeout handling to prevent stuck states.
- *
- * Features:
- * - Opus model for thorough analysis
- * - Configurable timeout (default 60s)
- * - Progress logging to .specweave/logs/judge-llm.log
- * - Structured verdict: PASS / CONCERNS / FAIL
- * - Domain-specific evaluation criteria
- *
- * @since v1.0.130
- */
-import Anthropic from '@anthropic-ai/sdk';
-import * as fs from '../../utils/fs-native.js';
-import { appendFileSync } from 'fs';
-import * as path from 'path';
-import chalk from 'chalk';
-import { resolveEffectiveRoot } from '../../utils/find-project-root.js';
-import { resolveModelAlias } from '../llm/types.js';
-import { supportsAdaptiveThinking } from '../llm/model-capabilities.js';
-import { loadStaticContext } from '../cache/static-context-loader.js';
-import { emitRefinementIfAttributable } from '../skill-signal-emit.js';
-/**
- * Construct the Anthropic API request body for a judge call.
- *
- * Thinking:
- * - Adaptive thinking IS an API parameter — `thinking: { type: "adaptive" }` is
- *   sent on every model that accepts it (Opus and Sonnet 4.6+), so the judge
- *   never runs with thinking off on the models it is meant for.
- * - `thinking: { type: "enabled", budget_tokens }` is rejected (400) on 4.7+ and
- *   is never sent. Depth is controlled by `output_config.effort`
- *   ('low' | 'medium' | 'high' | 'xhigh' | 'max', default 'high').
- * - Haiku 4.5 predates adaptive thinking and rejects both parameters, so they
- *   are omitted there rather than turned into a 400 and a pattern-match fallback.
- *
- * Model:
- * - `model` may be an alias ("opus"); it is resolved to a real model ID so the
- *   request always carries something the API accepts.
- *
- * Prompt caching (0669 Wave 2):
- * - When `cacheBlocks` is non-empty, its entries are prepended to the user
- *   message content as the first elements, BEFORE the dynamic prompt text.
- *   This lets the Anthropic API reuse the cached prefix on subsequent calls.
- */
-export function buildJudgeApiRequest(input) {
-    const { model, system, userPrompt, maxTokens, effort = 'high', cacheBlocks = [], } = input;
-    const userContent = cacheBlocks.length > 0
-        ? [
-            ...cacheBlocks.map((b) => ({ ...b })),
-            { type: 'text', text: userPrompt },
-        ]
-        : [];
-    const messages = userContent.length > 0
-        ? [{ role: 'user', content: userContent }]
-        : [{ role: 'user', content: userPrompt }];
-    const resolvedModel = resolveModelAlias(model);
-    const request = {
-        model: resolvedModel,
-        max_tokens: maxTokens,
-        system,
-        messages,
-    };
-    if (supportsAdaptiveThinking(resolvedModel)) {
-        request.thinking = { type: 'adaptive' };
-        request.output_config = { effort };
-    }
-    return request;
-}
-/**
- * Resolve the list of static files to cache from the SpecWeave config,
- * expanding the `<active>` placeholder to the provided increment ID.
- *
- * Returns an empty array when prompt caching is disabled or the config
- * doesn't include any static files.
- */
-/**
- * Files wrapped in cache_control blocks for every judge call.
- * 2.0 removed the `cache.staticContextFiles` config key — this is the list.
- */
-const STATIC_CONTEXT_FILES = [
-    'CLAUDE.md',
-    '.specweave/config.json',
-    '.specweave/increments/<active>/spec.md',
-];
-export async function resolveCacheFilePaths(projectRoot, incrementId) {
-    try {
-        const files = STATIC_CONTEXT_FILES;
-        if (!incrementId) {
-            return files.filter((f) => !f.includes('<active>'));
-        }
-        return files.map((f) => f.replace(/<active>/g, incrementId));
-    }
-    catch {
-        return [];
-    }
-}
-/**
- * Domain-specific evaluation criteria
- */
-const DOMAIN_CRITERIA = {
-    frontend: {
-        domain: 'frontend',
-        criteria: [
-            'Components follow React/Vue/Angular best practices',
-            'State management is correct and doesn\'t cause unnecessary re-renders',
-            'Accessibility (a11y) is considered - ARIA labels, keyboard navigation',
-            'Error boundaries and loading states are handled',
-            'No hardcoded values that should be props or config',
-            'Styles are maintainable (no inline styles, proper CSS organization)',
-        ],
-        weight: 8,
-    },
-    backend: {
-        domain: 'backend',
-        criteria: [
-            'API follows REST/GraphQL conventions correctly',
-            'Error handling is comprehensive - not just happy path',
-            'Input validation and sanitization present',
-            'Authentication/authorization checks where needed',
-            'Database queries are efficient (no N+1, proper indexes used)',
-            'Proper logging for debugging and monitoring',
-        ],
-        weight: 9,
-    },
-    mobile: {
-        domain: 'mobile',
-        criteria: [
-            'Platform-specific considerations handled (iOS/Android differences)',
-            'Performance optimized (no unnecessary re-renders, lazy loading)',
-            'Offline capability considered if applicable',
-            'Deep linking and navigation correct',
-            'Permissions requested appropriately',
-            'Memory management considered (no leaks)',
-        ],
-        weight: 8,
-    },
-    infrastructure: {
-        domain: 'infrastructure',
-        criteria: [
-            'Security groups and IAM policies follow least-privilege',
-            'Resources properly tagged for cost tracking',
-            'High availability considered (multi-AZ, replicas)',
-            'Secrets management correct (not hardcoded)',
-            'Monitoring and alerting configured',
-            'Backup and disaster recovery planned',
-        ],
-        weight: 10,
-    },
-    testing: {
-        domain: 'testing',
-        criteria: [
-            'Tests cover edge cases, not just happy path',
-            'Assertions are meaningful (not just `expect(true).toBe(true)`)',
-            'Test names clearly describe what is being tested',
-            'Mocks/stubs are appropriate and not over-used',
-            'Test data is realistic and covers boundary conditions',
-            'No flaky tests (deterministic, no race conditions)',
-        ],
-        weight: 9,
-    },
-    ml: {
-        domain: 'ml',
-        criteria: [
-            'Data preprocessing is correct and reproducible',
-            'Model architecture appropriate for the problem',
-            'Training/validation/test split proper',
-            'Evaluation metrics appropriate for the task',
-            'Model versioning and experiment tracking in place',
-            'Inference optimization considered (quantization, batching)',
-        ],
-        weight: 8,
-    },
-};
-/**
- * System prompt for the judge
- */
-const JUDGE_SYSTEM_PROMPT = `You are an expert code reviewer acting as a JUDGE for SpecWeave's self-validating skills system.
-
-Evaluate code quality, spec alignment, and best practices. Score against the bar below, not
-against how much effort the work appears to have taken.
-
-## Evaluation Framework
-
-Score the work on a 0-100 scale:
-- 90-100: PASS - Excellent, production-ready
-- 70-89: CONCERNS - Good but has issues that should be addressed
-- 0-69: FAIL - Significant problems, needs rework
-
-## What to check
-
-1. **Spec Alignment**: Does the implementation match requirements?
-2. **Code Quality**: Clean, readable, maintainable?
-3. **Best Practices**: Domain-specific patterns followed?
-4. **Edge Cases**: Error handling, null checks, validation?
-5. **Security**: No obvious vulnerabilities?
-6. **Performance**: No obvious bottlenecks?
-
-## Response Format
-
-Return ONLY valid JSON:
-{
-  "verdict": "PASS" | "CONCERNS" | "FAIL",
-  "score": 0-100,
-  "summary": "One sentence overall assessment",
-  "strengths": ["strength1", "strength2"],
-  "concerns": ["concern1", "concern2"],
-  "recommendations": ["recommendation1", "recommendation2"],
-  "domainChecks": [
-    {"criterion": "Name of check", "passed": true/false, "notes": "Brief note"}
-  ]
-}
-
-The score gates a release. Work that would not pass a production review scores below 70.`;
-/**
- * Progress logger for visibility
- */
-class ProgressLogger {
-    constructor(logPath, verbose) {
-        this.logPath = logPath;
-        this.startTime = Date.now();
-        this.verbose = verbose;
-        // Ensure log directory exists
-        const logDir = path.dirname(logPath);
-        if (!fs.existsSync(logDir)) {
-            fs.mkdirSync(logDir, { recursive: true });
-        }
-    }
-    log(message, level = 'INFO') {
-        const elapsed = ((Date.now() - this.startTime) / 1000).toFixed(1);
-        const timestamp = new Date().toISOString();
-        const entry = `[${timestamp}] [${elapsed}s] [${level}] ${message}`;
-        // Always write to file
-        appendFileSync(this.logPath, entry + '\n');
-        // Console output if verbose
-        if (this.verbose) {
-            const color = level === 'ERROR' ? chalk.red :
-                level === 'WARN' ? chalk.yellow :
-                    level === 'PROGRESS' ? chalk.blue :
-                        chalk.gray;
-            console.log(color(entry));
-        }
-    }
-    summary(result) {
-        const lines = [
-            '',
-            '═'.repeat(60),
-            'LLM JUDGE SUMMARY',
-            '═'.repeat(60),
-            `Verdict: ${result.verdict} (Score: ${result.score}/100)`,
-            `Duration: ${(result.duration_ms / 1000).toFixed(1)}s`,
-            result.timedOut ? '⚠️  TIMED OUT - partial evaluation' : '',
-            '',
-            `Summary: ${result.summary}`,
-            '',
-            'Strengths:',
-            ...result.strengths.map(s => `  ✅ ${s}`),
-            '',
-            'Concerns:',
-            ...result.concerns.map(c => `  ⚠️  ${c}`),
-            '',
-            'Recommendations:',
-            ...result.recommendations.map(r => `  💡 ${r}`),
-            '═'.repeat(60),
-        ].filter(Boolean);
-        for (const line of lines) {
-            this.log(line, 'INFO');
-        }
-    }
-}
-/**
- * Skill Judge using Opus model
- */
-export class SkillJudge {
-    constructor(options) {
-        this.client = null;
-        this.timeout_ms = options?.timeout_ms ?? 60000; // 60s default
-        this.verbose = options?.verbose ?? false;
-        this.model = options?.model ?? 'opus'; // Use generic model name (resolved at request time)
-        this.effort = options?.effort ?? 'high';
-        this.projectRoot = options?.projectRoot ?? resolveEffectiveRoot();
-        // Default log path
-        this.logPath = options?.logFile ??
-            path.join(this.projectRoot, '.specweave', 'logs', 'judge-llm.log');
-        // Initialize Anthropic client
-        const apiKey = process.env.ANTHROPIC_API_KEY;
-        if (apiKey) {
-            this.client = new Anthropic({ apiKey });
-        }
-    }
-    /**
-     * Judge skill/agent output
-     */
-    async judge(input) {
-        const logger = new ProgressLogger(this.logPath, this.verbose);
-        const startTime = Date.now();
-        logger.log(`Starting LLM Judge evaluation for domain: ${input.domain}`);
-        logger.log(`Task: ${input.taskDescription.slice(0, 100)}...`);
-        logger.log(`Using model: ${this.model}`);
-        logger.log(`Timeout: ${this.timeout_ms}ms`);
-        // Check for API client
-        if (!this.client) {
-            logger.log('No ANTHROPIC_API_KEY - falling back to basic evaluation', 'WARN');
-            return this.basicEvaluation(input, startTime, logger);
-        }
-        // Check external API consent before making paid API call
-        try {
-            const { checkConsent } = await import('../llm/consent.js');
-            const consent = checkConsent('anthropic', this.projectRoot);
-            if (consent !== 'granted') {
-                logger.log(`External API consent not granted (status: ${consent}) - falling back to basic evaluation`, 'WARN');
-                return this.basicEvaluation(input, startTime, logger);
-            }
-        }
-        catch (error) {
-            logger.log(`Consent check failed: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)} - falling back to basic evaluation`, 'WARN');
-            return this.basicEvaluation(input, startTime, logger);
-        }
-        // Build evaluation prompt
-        const criteria = DOMAIN_CRITERIA[input.domain] || DOMAIN_CRITERIA.backend;
-        const userPrompt = this.buildPrompt(input, criteria);
-        // Load static-context cache blocks (CLAUDE.md, config.json, active spec/rubric).
-        // Empty array when config disables caching or files are missing — judge() stays
-        // fully functional in both cases.
-        const cacheFilePaths = await resolveCacheFilePaths(this.projectRoot, input.incrementId);
-        const cacheBlocks = cacheFilePaths.length > 0
-            ? await loadStaticContext(cacheFilePaths, this.projectRoot)
-            : [];
-        if (cacheBlocks.length > 0) {
-            logger.log(`Prompt cache: ${cacheFilePaths.length} file(s), 1 ephemeral breakpoint`, 'INFO');
-        }
-        const requestBody = buildJudgeApiRequest({
-            model: this.model,
-            system: JUDGE_SYSTEM_PROMPT,
-            userPrompt,
-            // Adaptive thinking bills its tokens against max_tokens, so the JSON verdict
-            // needs headroom beyond what the thinking itself consumes.
-            maxTokens: 8000,
-            effort: this.effort,
-            cacheBlocks,
-        });
-        logger.log('Sending request to Opus...', 'PROGRESS');
-        try {
-            // Create abort controller for timeout
-            const controller = new AbortController();
-            const timeoutId = setTimeout(() => {
-                logger.log('Timeout reached, aborting request', 'WARN');
-                controller.abort();
-            }, this.timeout_ms);
-            // Make API call with timeout
-            const response = await this.client.messages.create(requestBody, { signal: controller.signal });
-            clearTimeout(timeoutId);
-            logger.log('Response received, parsing...', 'PROGRESS');
-            // Extract text content
-            const textContent = response.content.find(c => c.type === 'text');
-            if (!textContent || textContent.type !== 'text') {
-                throw new Error('No text response from model');
-            }
-            // Parse JSON response
-            const jsonMatch = textContent.text.match(/\{[\s\S]*\}/);
-            if (!jsonMatch) {
-                throw new Error('No JSON found in response');
-            }
-            const parsed = JSON.parse(jsonMatch[0]);
-            const result = {
-                ...parsed,
-                duration_ms: Date.now() - startTime,
-                timedOut: false,
-            };
-            logger.summary(result);
-            return result;
-        }
-        catch (error) {
-            const err = error;
-            if (err.name === 'AbortError' || err.message?.includes('aborted')) {
-                logger.log('Request timed out', 'ERROR');
-                return this.timeoutResult(input, startTime, logger);
-            }
-            logger.log(`API error: ${err.message}`, 'ERROR');
-            return this.basicEvaluation(input, startTime, logger);
-        }
-    }
-    /**
-     * Build the evaluation prompt
-     */
-    buildPrompt(input, criteria) {
-        const CODE_CHANGES_LIMIT = 40000;
-        const omitted = Math.max(0, input.codeChanges.length - CODE_CHANGES_LIMIT);
-        const parts = [
-            `## Domain: ${input.domain.toUpperCase()}`,
-            '',
-            `## Task Description`,
-            input.taskDescription,
-            '',
-            `## Code Changes`,
-            '```',
-            input.codeChanges.slice(0, CODE_CHANGES_LIMIT),
-            '```',
-        ];
-        // Never truncate silently — tell the judge it is scoring a partial diff.
-        if (omitted > 0) {
-            parts.push('', `NOTE: the diff was truncated — ${omitted} character(s) were omitted after the first ${CODE_CHANGES_LIMIT}. You are scoring a partial diff.`);
-        }
-        if (input.specRequirements) {
-            parts.push('', '## Spec Requirements', input.specRequirements);
-        }
-        if (input.acceptanceCriteria && input.acceptanceCriteria.length > 0) {
-            parts.push('', '## Acceptance Criteria');
-            for (const ac of input.acceptanceCriteria) {
-                parts.push(`- ${ac}`);
-            }
-        }
-        parts.push('', '## Domain-Specific Criteria to Evaluate');
-        for (const c of criteria.criteria) {
-            parts.push(`- ${c}`);
-        }
-        return parts.join('\n');
-    }
-    /**
-     * Basic evaluation when no API available
-     */
-    basicEvaluation(input, startTime, logger) {
-        logger.log('Running basic pattern-based evaluation', 'INFO');
-        const concerns = [];
-        const strengths = [];
-        let score = 70; // Start at baseline
-        const code = input.codeChanges.toLowerCase();
-        // Basic pattern checks
-        if (code.includes('todo') || code.includes('fixme')) {
-            concerns.push('Contains TODO/FIXME comments');
-            score -= 5;
-        }
-        if (code.includes('console.log') && input.domain !== 'testing') {
-            concerns.push('Contains console.log statements');
-            score -= 3;
-        }
-        if (code.includes('any') && input.domain === 'frontend') {
-            concerns.push('Uses TypeScript "any" type');
-            score -= 5;
-        }
-        if (code.includes('eslint-disable') || code.includes('@ts-ignore')) {
-            concerns.push('Contains lint/type suppressions');
-            score -= 5;
-        }
-        if (code.includes('try') && code.includes('catch')) {
-            strengths.push('Has error handling');
-            score += 5;
-        }
-        if (code.includes('test') || code.includes('expect')) {
-            strengths.push('Includes tests');
-            score += 5;
-        }
-        const verdict = score >= 90 ? 'PASS' :
-            score >= 70 ? 'CONCERNS' : 'FAIL';
-        const result = {
-            verdict,
-            score: Math.max(0, Math.min(100, score)),
-            summary: 'Basic pattern-based evaluation (no API key)',
-            strengths: strengths.length > 0 ? strengths : ['No obvious issues detected'],
-            concerns: concerns.length > 0 ? concerns : ['Full LLM review recommended'],
-            recommendations: ['Run with ANTHROPIC_API_KEY for full Opus evaluation'],
-            domainChecks: [],
-            duration_ms: Date.now() - startTime,
-            timedOut: false,
-        };
-        logger.summary(result);
-        return result;
-    }
-    /**
-     * Result when timeout occurs
-     */
-    timeoutResult(input, startTime, logger) {
-        const result = {
-            verdict: 'CONCERNS',
-            score: 50,
-            summary: `Evaluation timed out after ${this.timeout_ms}ms - manual review recommended`,
-            strengths: [],
-            concerns: ['Evaluation could not complete within timeout'],
-            recommendations: [
-                'Increase timeout with --timeout option',
-                'Check API connectivity',
-                'Consider breaking into smaller chunks',
-            ],
-            domainChecks: [],
-            duration_ms: Date.now() - startTime,
-            timedOut: true,
-        };
-        logger.summary(result);
-        return result;
-    }
-    /**
-     * Write judge result to persistent report file for CLI verification.
-     * The completion-validator checks for this file before allowing closure.
-     */
-    writeReport(incrementId, result, consentStatus) {
-        const reportsDir = path.join(this.projectRoot, '.specweave', 'increments', incrementId, 'reports');
-        if (!fs.existsSync(reportsDir)) {
-            fs.mkdirSync(reportsDir, { recursive: true });
-        }
-        const reportPath = path.join(reportsDir, 'judge-llm-report.json');
-        const verdictMap = {
-            'PASS': 'APPROVED',
-            'CONCERNS': 'CONCERNS',
-            'FAIL': 'REJECTED',
-        };
-        const report = {
-            version: '1.0',
-            incrementId,
-            timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
-            verdict: verdictMap[result.verdict] ?? result.verdict,
-            score: result.score,
-            mode: this.client ? 'adaptive-thinking' : 'pattern-match',
-            timedOut: result.timedOut,
-            duration_ms: result.duration_ms,
-            consentStatus,
-            summary: result.summary,
-            strengths: result.strengths,
-            concerns: result.concerns,
-            recommendations: result.recommendations,
-            domainChecks: result.domainChecks,
-        };
-        fs.writeFileSync(reportPath, JSON.stringify(report, null, 2));
-        // 0671: emit refinement signals when a gate failure is attributable to a
-        // specific skill. Best-effort — never throws.
-        void this.emitRefinementSignals(incrementId, result);
-        return reportPath;
-    }
-    /**
-     * Post-processing step for `writeReport`: scan concerns/recommendations/
-     * summary for skill-attributable findings and emit one refinement signal
-     * per attributed skill. Silent on PASS verdicts. Never throws.
-     *
-     * @internal exported for testability via a direct method call.
-     */
-    async emitRefinementSignals(incrementId, result) {
-        // Only emit on CONCERNS or FAIL — PASS verdicts are not "gate failures".
-        if (result.verdict === 'PASS')
-            return;
-        const severity = result.verdict === 'FAIL' ? 'high' : 'medium';
-        const skillsRoot = path.join(this.projectRoot, 'plugins', 'specweave', 'skills');
-        // Attribute each evidence string, then emit at most one signal per
-        // distinct skill within this report — otherwise a verbose judge response
-        // that mentions the same slug in summary+concerns+recommendations would
-        // produce 3 duplicate signals.
-        const { attributeSkill } = await import('../skill-attribution.js');
-        const perSkillEvidence = new Map();
-        const evidenceSources = [
-            ...result.concerns,
-            ...result.recommendations,
-            result.summary,
-        ];
-        for (const evidence of evidenceSources) {
-            if (!evidence)
-                continue;
-            const attrib = attributeSkill({ evidenceText: evidence, skillsRoot });
-            if (attrib.skill && !perSkillEvidence.has(attrib.skill)) {
-                perSkillEvidence.set(attrib.skill, evidence);
-            }
-        }
-        for (const [skill, evidence] of perSkillEvidence) {
-            try {
-                await emitRefinementIfAttributable({
-                    projectRoot: this.projectRoot,
-                    source: 'judge-llm',
-                    severity,
-                    incrementId,
-                    evidence,
-                    attribution: {
-                        // Force direct attribution since we already resolved the skill.
-                        toolCallOrigin: skill,
-                    },
-                });
-            }
-            catch {
-                // Best-effort: never block the gate on signal-emission errors.
-            }
-        }
-    }
-    /**
-     * Write a WAIVED report when consent is denied or no API key available.
-     */
-    writeWaivedReport(incrementId, reason) {
-        const reportsDir = path.join(this.projectRoot, '.specweave', 'increments', incrementId, 'reports');
-        if (!fs.existsSync(reportsDir)) {
-            fs.mkdirSync(reportsDir, { recursive: true });
-        }
-        const reportPath = path.join(reportsDir, 'judge-llm-report.json');
-        const report = {
-            version: '1.0',
-            incrementId,
-            timestamp: new Date().toISOString(),
-            verdict: 'WAIVED',
-            consentStatus: 'denied',
-            reason,
-        };
-        fs.writeFileSync(reportPath, JSON.stringify(report, null, 2));
-        return reportPath;
-    }
-    /**
-     * Format result for display
-     */
-    formatResult(result) {
-        const icon = result.verdict === 'PASS' ? '✅' :
-            result.verdict === 'CONCERNS' ? '⚠️' : '❌';
-        const lines = [
-            '',
-            chalk.bold('LLM Judge Evaluation'),
-            '─'.repeat(50),
-            `${icon} Verdict: ${chalk.bold(result.verdict)} (Score: ${result.score}/100)`,
-            `Duration: ${(result.duration_ms / 1000).toFixed(1)}s`,
-            result.timedOut ? chalk.yellow('⚠️  Timed out - partial evaluation') : '',
-            '',
-            chalk.bold('Summary:'),
-            `  ${result.summary}`,
-        ];
-        if (result.strengths.length > 0) {
-            lines.push('', chalk.green('Strengths:'));
-            for (const s of result.strengths) {
-                lines.push(`  ✅ ${s}`);
-            }
-        }
-        if (result.concerns.length > 0) {
-            lines.push('', chalk.yellow('Concerns:'));
-            for (const c of result.concerns) {
-                lines.push(`  ⚠️  ${c}`);
-            }
-        }
-        if (result.recommendations.length > 0) {
-            lines.push('', chalk.blue('Recommendations:'));
-            for (const r of result.recommendations) {
-                lines.push(`  💡 ${r}`);
-            }
-        }
-        if (result.domainChecks.length > 0) {
-            lines.push('', chalk.bold('Domain Checks:'));
-            for (const check of result.domainChecks) {
-                const checkIcon = check.passed ? '✅' : '❌';
-                lines.push(`  ${checkIcon} ${check.criterion}: ${check.notes}`);
-            }
-        }
-        lines.push('─'.repeat(50));
-        return lines.filter(Boolean).join('\n');
-    }
-}
-/**
- * Quick judge function for CLI usage
- */
-export async function judgeSkillOutput(domain, taskDescription, codeChanges, options) {
-    const judge = new SkillJudge(options);
-    return judge.judge({
-        domain,
-        taskDescription,
-        codeChanges,
-    });
-}
-/**
- * Judge with spec context
- */
-export async function judgeWithSpec(domain, taskDescription, codeChanges, specRequirements, acceptanceCriteria, options) {
-    const judge = new SkillJudge(options);
-    return judge.judge({
-        domain,
-        taskDescription,
-        codeChanges,
-        specRequirements,
-        acceptanceCriteria,
-    });
-}
-//# sourceMappingURL=skill-judge.js.map