specweave 1.0.593 → 2.0.0

package/plugins/specweave/skills/tdd-cycle/SKILL.md

@@ -1,267 +0,0 @@
----
-description: Execute full TDD red-green-refactor cycle with validation gates. Use when saying "TDD cycle", "test-driven development", or "full TDD workflow".
-version: 1.0.0
----
-
-# TDD Cycle - Comprehensive Test-Driven Development
-
-## --phase Flag (v1.1.0+)
-
-`sw:tdd-cycle` supports a `--phase` flag to run a single phase of the RED → GREEN → REFACTOR cycle. Omitting the flag (or passing `--phase all`) runs the full cycle.
-
-| Flag | Behavior |
-|------|----------|
-| `--phase all` (default) | Full RED → GREEN → REFACTOR cycle. Same as omitting the flag. |
-| `--phase red` | Runs only the RED phase — write failing tests. See Phase 2 below. |
-| `--phase green` | Runs only the GREEN phase — write minimal code to make tests pass. See Phase 3 below. |
-| `--phase refactor` | Runs only the REFACTOR phase — improve code quality with tests as safety net. See Phase 4 below. |
-
-### Alias routing from deprecated skills
-
-The following deprecated single-phase skills are aliased in `marketplace.json` to route through `sw:tdd-cycle --phase <x>`:
-
-- `/sw:tdd-red` → `/sw:tdd-cycle --phase red`
-- `/sw:tdd-green` → `/sw:tdd-cycle --phase green`
-- `/sw:tdd-refactor` → `/sw:tdd-cycle --phase refactor`
-
-The aliases emit a one-time migration warning pointing users to the canonical `--phase` form. The three `tdd-*` skills are scheduled for removal in v1.3.0 — see `.specweave/docs/internal/specs/skill-deprecation-policy.md`.
-
-### Examples
-
-```bash
-# Full cycle (default)
-sw:tdd-cycle "user authentication"
-
-# Single phases
-sw:tdd-cycle --phase red "user authentication"
-sw:tdd-cycle --phase green "user authentication"
-sw:tdd-cycle --phase refactor "user authentication"
-
-# Same as default — explicit
-sw:tdd-cycle --phase all "user authentication"
-```
-
----
-
-## Project Overrides
-
-**Skill Memories**: If `.specweave/skill-memories/tdd-cycle.md` exists, read and apply its learnings.
-
-Execute a comprehensive Test-Driven Development (TDD) workflow with strict red-green-refactor discipline:
-
-[Extended thinking: This workflow enforces test-first development through coordinated agent orchestration. Each phase of the TDD cycle is strictly enforced with fail-first verification, incremental implementation, and continuous refactoring. The workflow supports both single test and test suite approaches with configurable coverage thresholds.]
-
-## Configuration
-
-### Coverage Thresholds
-- Minimum line coverage: 80%
-- Minimum branch coverage: 75%
-- Critical path coverage: 100%
-
-### Refactoring Triggers
-- Cyclomatic complexity > 10
-- Method length > 20 lines
-- Class length > 200 lines
-- Duplicate code blocks > 3 lines
-
-## Phase 1: Test Specification and Design
-
-### 1. Requirements Analysis
-- Use Task tool with subagent_type="Plan"
-- Prompt: "Analyze requirements for: $ARGUMENTS. Define acceptance criteria, identify edge cases, and create test scenarios. Output a comprehensive test specification."
-- Output: Test specification, acceptance criteria, edge case matrix
-- Validation: Ensure all requirements have corresponding test scenarios
-
-### 2. Test Architecture Design
-- Use Task tool with subagent_type="general-purpose"
-- Prompt: "Design test architecture for: $ARGUMENTS based on test specification. Define test structure, fixtures, mocks, and test data strategy. Ensure testability and maintainability."
-- Output: Test architecture, fixture design, mock strategy
-- Validation: Architecture supports isolated, fast, reliable tests
-
-## Phase 2: RED - Write Failing Tests
-
-### 3. Write Unit Tests (Failing)
-- Use Task tool with subagent_type="general-purpose"
-- Prompt: "Write FAILING unit tests for: $ARGUMENTS. Tests must fail initially. Include edge cases, error scenarios, and happy paths. DO NOT implement production code."
-- Output: Failing unit tests, test documentation
-- **CRITICAL**: Verify all tests fail with expected error messages
-
-### 4. Verify Test Failure
-- Use Task tool with subagent_type="general-purpose"
-- Prompt: "Verify that all tests for: $ARGUMENTS are failing correctly. Ensure failures are for the right reasons (missing implementation, not test errors). Confirm no false positives."
-- Output: Test failure verification report
-- **GATE**: Do not proceed until all tests fail appropriately
-
-## Phase 3: GREEN - Make Tests Pass
-
-### 5. Minimal Implementation
-- Use Task tool with subagent_type="general-purpose"
-- Prompt: "Implement MINIMAL code to make tests pass for: $ARGUMENTS. Focus only on making tests green. Do not add extra features or optimizations. Keep it simple."
-- Output: Minimal working implementation
-- Constraint: No code beyond what's needed to pass tests
-
-### 6. Verify Test Success
-- Use Task tool with subagent_type="general-purpose"
-- Prompt: "Run all tests for: $ARGUMENTS and verify they pass. Check test coverage metrics. Ensure no tests were accidentally broken."
-- Output: Test execution report, coverage metrics
-- **GATE**: All tests must pass before proceeding
-
-## Phase 4: REFACTOR - Improve Code Quality
-
-### 7. Code Refactoring
-- Use Task tool with subagent_type="general-purpose"
-- Prompt: "Refactor implementation for: $ARGUMENTS while keeping tests green. Apply SOLID principles, remove duplication, improve naming, and optimize performance. Run tests after each refactoring."
-- Output: Refactored code, refactoring report
-- Constraint: Tests must remain green throughout
-
-### 8. Test Refactoring
-- Use Task tool with subagent_type="general-purpose"
-- Prompt: "Refactor tests for: $ARGUMENTS. Remove test duplication, improve test names, extract common fixtures, and enhance test readability. Ensure tests still provide same coverage."
-- Output: Refactored tests, improved test structure
-- Validation: Coverage metrics unchanged or improved
-
-## Phase 5: Integration and System Tests
-
-### 9. Write Integration Tests (Failing First)
-- Use Task tool with subagent_type="general-purpose"
-- Prompt: "Write FAILING integration tests for: $ARGUMENTS. Test component interactions, API contracts, and data flow. Tests must fail initially."
-- Output: Failing integration tests
-- Validation: Tests fail due to missing integration logic
-
-### 10. Implement Integration
-- Use Task tool with subagent_type="general-purpose"
-- Prompt: "Implement integration code for: $ARGUMENTS to make integration tests pass. Focus on component interaction and data flow."
-- Output: Integration implementation
-- Validation: All integration tests pass
-
-## Phase 6: Continuous Improvement Cycle
-
-### 11. Performance and Edge Case Tests
-- Use Task tool with subagent_type="general-purpose"
-- Prompt: "Add performance tests and additional edge case tests for: $ARGUMENTS. Include stress tests, boundary tests, and error recovery tests."
-- Output: Extended test suite
-- Metric: Increased test coverage and scenario coverage
-
-### 12. Final Code Review
-- Use Task tool with subagent_type="Plan"
-- Prompt: "Perform comprehensive review of: $ARGUMENTS. Verify TDD process was followed, check code quality, test quality, and coverage. Suggest improvements."
-- Output: Review report, improvement suggestions
-- Action: Implement critical suggestions while maintaining green tests
-
-## Incremental Development Mode
-
-For test-by-test development:
-1. Write ONE failing test
-2. Make ONLY that test pass
-3. Refactor if needed
-4. Repeat for next test
-
-Use this approach by adding `--incremental` flag to focus on one test at a time.
-
-## Test Suite Mode
-
-For comprehensive test suite development:
-1. Write ALL tests for a feature/module (failing)
-2. Implement code to pass ALL tests
-3. Refactor entire module
-4. Add integration tests
-
-Use this approach by adding `--suite` flag for batch test development.
-
-## Validation Checkpoints
-
-### RED Phase Validation
-- [ ] All tests written before implementation
-- [ ] All tests fail with meaningful error messages
-- [ ] Test failures are due to missing implementation
-- [ ] No test passes accidentally
-
-### GREEN Phase Validation
-- [ ] All tests pass
-- [ ] No extra code beyond test requirements
-- [ ] Coverage meets minimum thresholds
-- [ ] No test was modified to make it pass
-
-### REFACTOR Phase Validation
-- [ ] All tests still pass after refactoring
-- [ ] Code complexity reduced
-- [ ] Duplication eliminated
-- [ ] Performance improved or maintained
-- [ ] Test readability improved
-
-## Coverage Reports
-
-Generate coverage reports after each phase:
-- Line coverage
-- Branch coverage
-- Function coverage
-- Statement coverage
-
-## Failure Recovery
-
-If TDD discipline is broken:
-1. **STOP** immediately
-2. Identify which phase was violated
-3. Rollback to last valid state
-4. Resume from correct phase
-5. Document lesson learned
-
-## TDD Metrics Tracking
-
-Track and report:
-- Time in each phase (Red/Green/Refactor)
-- Number of test-implementation cycles
-- Coverage progression
-- Refactoring frequency
-- Defect escape rate
-
-## Anti-Patterns to Avoid
-
-- Writing implementation before tests
-- Writing tests that already pass
-- Skipping the refactor phase
-- Writing multiple features without tests
-- Modifying tests to make them pass
-- Ignoring failing tests
-- Writing tests after implementation
-
-## Anti-Rationalization Table
-
-These excuses signal you're about to break TDD discipline. Recognize them and return to the correct phase.
-
-| Excuse | Rebuttal | Why It Matters |
-|--------|----------|----------------|
-| "I'll test after" | Tests written after implementation pass immediately, proving nothing. You can't verify a test catches bugs if you never saw it fail. | Tests-after are biased by implementation — you test what you built, not what's required |
-| "This is too simple to test" | Simple code has the most unexamined assumptions. Simple code breaks at integration boundaries where you least expect it. | The simpler it seems, the more likely you'll miss an edge case |
-| "TDD slows me down" | TDD prevents 2-3 hour debugging sessions. Writing a test takes minutes; debugging an untested bug takes hours. | The time you "save" skipping tests is borrowed against future debugging |
-| "Just this once" | Every "just this once" becomes the new standard. Discipline has no exceptions — the exception IS the precedent. | One skip normalizes skipping. There is no "just this once" |
-| "I already manually tested it" | Manual testing leaves no record, isn't repeatable, and doesn't catch regressions. It proves nothing to anyone but you, right now. | Manual tests evaporate. Automated tests compound |
-| "Deleting my code is wasteful" | Sunk cost fallacy — keeping bad code costs more than writing it correctly. Code written without tests is unverified code. | Bad code costs more to maintain than to rewrite correctly |
-| "The spirit matters, not the ritual" | The ritual IS the spirit — the specific order (test → fail → implement → pass → refactor) is what produces the quality guarantee. | Skipping steps while claiming to follow TDD is not following TDD |
-| "I'll keep deleted code as reference" | Reference code biases you toward the wrong implementation. Start fresh — the test tells you what to write. | Prior code anchors you to assumptions that may be wrong |
-
-## Success Criteria
-
-- 100% of code written test-first
-- All tests pass continuously
-- Coverage exceeds thresholds
-- Code complexity within limits
-- Zero defects in covered code
-- Clear test documentation
-- Fast test execution (< 5 seconds for unit tests)
-
-## Notes
-
-- Enforce strict RED-GREEN-REFACTOR discipline
-- Each phase must be completed before moving to next
-- Tests are the specification
-- If a test is hard to write, the design needs improvement
-- Refactoring is NOT optional
-- Keep test execution fast
-- Tests should be independent and isolated
-
-TDD implementation for: $ARGUMENTS
-
-## Resources
-
-- [Official Documentation](https://verified-skill.com/docs/reference/skills#tdd-cycle)

package/plugins/specweave/skills/tdd-green/SKILL.md

@@ -1,84 +0,0 @@
----
-description: "[DEPRECATED] Write minimal code to make failing tests pass. Use when saying \"TDD green\", \"make tests pass\", or \"implement for tests\"."
-version: 1.0.0
-deprecated: true
----
-
-> ⚠️ DEPRECATED: Use `sw:tdd-cycle --phase green` instead. This skill will be removed in v1.3.0.
-
-## Migration
-
-This skill has been deprecated as part of the Opus 4.7 framework alignment (increment 0669).
-
-- **Use instead**: `sw:tdd-cycle --phase green` runs only the GREEN phase (write minimal code to make tests pass)
-- **Removal**: Scheduled for v1.3.0 (2 minor releases after v1.1.0)
-- **Why**: The three TDD phase skills (tdd-red, tdd-green, tdd-refactor) were consolidated into `sw:tdd-cycle` with a `--phase` flag. Alias routing in `marketplace.json` redirects `/sw:tdd-green` → `/sw:tdd-cycle --phase green` automatically.
-
-For the migration policy, see `.specweave/docs/internal/specs/skill-deprecation-policy.md`.
-
----
-
-# TDD Green Phase - Make Tests Pass
-
-## Project Overrides
-
-**Skill Memories**: If `.specweave/skill-memories/tdd-green.md` exists, read and apply its learnings.
-
-Implement minimal code to make failing tests pass in TDD green phase.
-
-## Implementation Process
-
-Use Task tool with subagent_type="general-purpose" to implement minimal passing code.
-
-Prompt: "Implement MINIMAL code to make these failing tests pass: $ARGUMENTS. Follow TDD green phase principles:
-
-1. **Pre-Implementation Analysis**
-   - Review all failing tests and their error messages
-   - Identify the simplest path to make tests pass
-   - Avoid premature optimization or over-engineering
-
-2. **Implementation Strategy**
-   - **Fake It**: Return hard-coded values when appropriate
-   - **Obvious Implementation**: When solution is trivial and clear
-   - **Triangulation**: Generalize only when multiple tests require it
-   - One test at a time — don't try to pass all at once
-
-3. **Code Guidelines**
-   - Write the minimal code that could possibly work
-   - Avoid adding functionality not required by tests
-   - Defer architectural decisions until refactor phase
-   - Don't add error handling unless tests require it
-
-4. **Progressive Implementation**
-   - Make first test pass with simplest possible code
-   - Run tests after each change to verify progress
-   - Add just enough code for next failing test
-   - Keep track of technical debt for refactor phase
-
-5. **Anti-Patterns to Avoid**
-   - Gold plating or adding unrequested features
-   - Implementing design patterns prematurely
-   - Refactoring during implementation
-   - Ignoring test failures to move forward
-
-Output:
-- Complete implementation code
-- Test execution results showing all green
-- List of shortcuts taken for later refactoring"
-
-## Post-Implementation Checks
-
-1. Run full test suite — confirm all tests pass
-2. Verify no existing tests were broken
-3. Document areas needing refactoring
-4. Check implementation is truly minimal
-
-## Recovery
-
-If tests still fail: review test requirements carefully, check for misunderstood assertions, add minimal code to address specific failures.
-
-Tests to make pass: $ARGUMENTS
-
-## Resources
-
-- [Official Documentation](https://verified-skill.com/docs/reference/skills#tdd-green)

package/plugins/specweave/skills/tdd-red/SKILL.md

@@ -1,90 +0,0 @@
----
-description: "[DEPRECATED] Write failing tests that define expected behavior. Use when saying \"TDD red\", \"write failing tests\", or \"test first\"."
-version: 1.0.0
-deprecated: true
----
-
-> ⚠️ DEPRECATED: Use `sw:tdd-cycle --phase red` instead. This skill will be removed in v1.3.0.
-
-## Migration
-
-This skill has been deprecated as part of the Opus 4.7 framework alignment (increment 0669).
-
-- **Use instead**: `sw:tdd-cycle --phase red` runs only the RED phase (write failing tests)
-- **Removal**: Scheduled for v1.3.0 (2 minor releases after v1.1.0)
-- **Why**: The three TDD phase skills (tdd-red, tdd-green, tdd-refactor) were consolidated into `sw:tdd-cycle` with a `--phase` flag. Alias routing in `marketplace.json` redirects `/sw:tdd-red` → `/sw:tdd-cycle --phase red` automatically.
-
-For the migration policy, see `.specweave/docs/internal/specs/skill-deprecation-policy.md`.
-
----
-
-# TDD Red Phase - Write Failing Tests
-
-## Project Overrides
-
-**Skill Memories**: If `.specweave/skill-memories/tdd-red.md` exists, read and apply its learnings.
-
-Write comprehensive failing tests following TDD red phase principles.
-
-## Role
-
-Generate failing tests using Task tool with subagent_type="unit-testing::test-automator".
-
-## Prompt Template
-
-"Generate comprehensive FAILING tests for: $ARGUMENTS
-
-## Core Requirements
-
-1. **Test Structure**: Framework-appropriate setup, Arrange-Act-Assert, should_X_when_Y naming, isolated fixtures
-2. **Behavior Coverage**: Happy path, edge cases (empty/null/boundary), error handling, concurrent access
-3. **Failure Verification**: Tests MUST fail when run, for RIGHT reasons (not syntax/import errors), meaningful diagnostics
-4. **Test Categories**: Unit (isolated), Integration (interaction), Contract (API/interface), Property (invariants)
-
-## CLI Integration Test Patterns
-
-**Temp Home Isolation** (prevents touching real ~/.specweave/):
-```typescript
-import { withIsolatedHome, getIsolatedEnv } from '../test-utils/temp-home.js';
-
-it('should run CLI command in isolated environment', async () => {
-  const { homePath, restore } = await withIsolatedHome('my-test');
-  try {
-    const { stdout } = await execAsync('node bin/cli.js --version', {
-      env: getIsolatedEnv(homePath),
-    });
-    expect(normalizeOutput(stdout)).toMatch(/^\d+\.\d+\.\d+$/);
-  } finally {
-    await restore();
-  }
-});
-```
-
-**Hook Execution Testing**:
-```typescript
-import { HookTestHarness } from '../test-utils/hook-test-harness.js';
-import { extractJson } from '../test-utils/normalize-output.js';
-
-it('should return approve decision from hook', async () => {
-  const harness = new HookTestHarness(testDir, hookPath);
-  const result = await harness.execute({ CI: 'true' });
-  const json = extractJson<{ decision: string }>(result.stdout);
-  expect(json?.decision).toBe('approve');
-});
-```
-
-**Process Spawning**: Use `getCleanEnv()`/`getIsolatedEnv()` to strip NODE_OPTIONS. Set `{ timeout: 30000 }`. Use `normalizeOutput()` and `extractJson()`.
-
-## Validation
-
-After generation:
-1. Run tests — confirm they fail
-2. Verify helpful failure messages
-3. Check test independence
-4. Ensure comprehensive coverage"
-
-Test requirements: $ARGUMENTS
-
-## Resources
-
-- [Official Documentation](https://verified-skill.com/docs/reference/skills#tdd-red)

package/plugins/specweave/skills/tdd-refactor/SKILL.md

@@ -1,59 +0,0 @@
----
-description: "[DEPRECATED] Refactor code with test safety net to improve quality. Use when saying \"TDD refactor\", \"refactor with tests\", or \"improve code quality\"."
-version: 1.0.0
-deprecated: true
----
-
-> ⚠️ DEPRECATED: Use `sw:tdd-cycle --phase refactor` instead. This skill will be removed in v1.3.0.
-
-## Migration
-
-This skill has been deprecated as part of the Opus 4.7 framework alignment (increment 0669).
-
-- **Use instead**: `sw:tdd-cycle --phase refactor` runs only the REFACTOR phase (improve code quality with test safety net)
-- **Removal**: Scheduled for v1.3.0 (2 minor releases after v1.1.0)
-- **Why**: The three TDD phase skills (tdd-red, tdd-green, tdd-refactor) were consolidated into `sw:tdd-cycle` with a `--phase` flag. Alias routing in `marketplace.json` redirects `/sw:tdd-refactor` → `/sw:tdd-cycle --phase refactor` automatically.
-
-For the migration policy, see `.specweave/docs/internal/specs/skill-deprecation-policy.md`.
-
----
-
-# TDD Refactor Phase - Improve Code Quality
-
-Refactor code with confidence using comprehensive test safety net.
-
-## Usage
-
-Use Task tool with subagent_type="general-purpose" to perform safe refactoring.
-
-Prompt: "Refactor this code while keeping all tests green: $ARGUMENTS. Apply TDD refactor phase:
-
-1. **Pre-Assessment**: Run tests to establish green baseline, analyze code smells, document current metrics
-2. **Code Smell Detection**: Duplicated code, long methods, large classes, long parameter lists, feature envy, dead code
-3. **Refactoring Techniques**: Extract Method/Variable/Interface, inline unnecessary indirection, rename for clarity, move to appropriate classes, replace conditionals with polymorphism
-4. **Incremental Steps**: Small atomic changes, run tests after each modification, commit after each successful refactoring, keep separate from behavior changes
-5. **Safety Verification**: Run full test suite after each change, check for performance regressions, maintain/improve code coverage
-
-Output:
-- Refactored code with improvements applied
-- Test results (all green)
-- Before/after metrics comparison
-- Applied refactoring techniques list"
-
-## Safety Checklist
-
-Before committing:
-- All tests pass (100% green)
-- No functionality regression
-- Performance metrics acceptable
-- Code coverage maintained/improved
-
-## Recovery
-
-If tests fail: immediately revert last change, identify breaking refactoring, apply smaller incremental changes.
-
-Code to refactor: $ARGUMENTS
-
-## Resources
-
-- [Official Documentation](https://verified-skill.com/docs/reference/skills#tdd-refactor)

package/plugins/specweave/skills/team-build/SKILL.md

@@ -1,29 +0,0 @@
----
-name: sw/team-build
-description: "[DEPRECATED] Use sw:team-lead --preset <name> instead."
-version: 1.0.0
-allowed-tools: Read
----
-
-> Deprecated: `sw:team-build` is deprecated. Use `sw:team-lead --preset <name>` instead.
-> This skill will be removed in SpecWeave v1.3.0.
-
-## Migration
-
-Replace:
-```
-/sw:team-build <preset-name>
-```
-With:
-```
-/sw:team-lead --preset <preset-name>
-```
-
-## Supported Presets
-
-The same preset names from team-build are available via `--preset`:
-
-- `full-stack` — frontend + backend + database + testing agents
-- `api-only` — backend + database + testing agents
-- `frontend-only` — frontend + testing agents
-- `microservice` — backend + testing + devops agents