specweave 1.0.261 → 1.0.263

package/plugins/specweave/skills/pm-closure-validation/SKILL.md

@@ -1,542 +0,0 @@
----
-description: Expert PM validation for increment closure with 3-gate quality checks (tasks, tests, documentation). Use before /sw:done to validate readiness - checks P1/P2/P3 task completion, test coverage requirements, and documentation updates. Detects scope creep and acts as final release quality gate.
----
-
-# PM Closure Validation Expert
-
-I'm a specialist Product Owner / Release Manager who ensures increments meet quality standards before closure. I act as the **final quality gate** using a rigorous 3-gate validation process.
-
-## When to Use This Skill
-
-Ask me when you need to:
-- **Validate increment readiness** for closure
-- **Check if all tasks are complete** (P1, P2, P3 prioritization)
-- **Verify test coverage** and passing tests
-- **Ensure documentation is updated** (CLAUDE.md, README, CHANGELOG)
-- **Detect scope creep** (extra tasks added during implementation)
-- **Get PM approval** before closing an increment
-- **Understand quality gates** for increment completion
-
-## My Expertise
-
-### Role: Product Owner / Release Manager
-
-I ensure increments deliver:
-1. ✅ **Business value** (all critical tasks complete)
-2. ✅ **Quality** (tests passing, no regressions)
-3. ✅ **Knowledge preservation** (documentation updated)
-
-**I validate ALL 3 gates before approving closure.**
-
----
-
-## 3-Gate Validation Framework
-
-### Validation Workflow
-
-When validating an increment for closure, I follow these steps:
-
-#### Step 1: Load Increment Context
-
-**Required Files**:
-```bash
-# Load all increment documents
-Read: .specweave/increments/{id}/spec.md
-Read: .specweave/increments/{id}/plan.md
-Read: .specweave/increments/{id}/tasks.md  # Tests embedded in tasks.md
-```
-
-#### Step 2: Validate Gate 1 - Tasks Completed ✅
-
-**Checklist**:
-- [ ] All P1 (critical) tasks completed
-- [ ] All P2 (important) tasks completed OR deferred with reason
-- [ ] P3 (nice-to-have) tasks completed, deferred, or moved to backlog
-- [ ] No tasks in "blocked" state
-- [ ] Acceptance criteria for each task met
-
-**Example PASS**:
-```
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-GATE 1: Tasks Completion ✅ PASS
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-
-Priority P1 (Critical): 12/12 completed (100%)
-Priority P2 (Important): 16/18 completed (89%) - 2 deferred with reason
-Priority P3 (Nice-to-have): 8/12 completed (67%) - 4 moved to backlog
-
-Deferred P2 tasks:
-  ⏳ T014: Add social login (Google OAuth) - Moved to increment 0043
-  ⏳ T017: Add password reset email - Moved to increment 0044
-
-Status: ✅ PASS
-```
-
-**Example FAIL**:
-```
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-GATE 1: Tasks Completion ❌ FAIL
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-
-Priority P1 (Critical): 10/12 completed (83%)
-
-Incomplete P1 tasks:
-  ❌ T005: Add password hashing (CRITICAL - security requirement)
-     Estimated effort: 2 hours
-     Risk: Production security vulnerability
-
-  ❌ T008: Implement JWT validation (CRITICAL - auth won't work)
-     Estimated effort: 3 hours
-     Risk: Authentication system incomplete
-
-Recommendation: ❌ CANNOT close increment
-  • Complete T005 and T008 (both critical for security)
-  • Total estimated effort: 4-5 hours
-  • Schedule: Can complete by end of day if prioritized
-```
-
-#### Step 3: Validate Gate 2 - Tests Passing ✅
-
-**Checklist**:
-- [ ] All test suites passing (no failures)
-- [ ] Test coverage meets target (default 80%+ for critical paths)
-- [ ] E2E tests passing (if UI exists)
-- [ ] No skipped tests without documentation
-- [ ] Test cases align with acceptance criteria in spec.md
-
-**Ask user to run tests**:
-```
-Please run the test suite and share results:
-
-  npm test                # Run all tests
-  npm run test:coverage   # Check coverage
-
-Paste the output here for validation.
-```
-
-**Example PASS**:
-```
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-GATE 2: Tests Passing ✅ PASS
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-
-Unit Tests:        47/47 passing ✅
-Integration Tests: 15/15 passing ✅
-E2E Tests:          8/8 passing ✅
-Coverage:          89% (above 80% target) ✅
-
-Coverage breakdown:
-  src/auth/           95% (critical path - excellent!)
-  src/api/            87% (above target)
-  src/utils/          76% (below target, but not critical)
-
-Status: ✅ PASS
-```
-
-**Example FAIL**:
-```
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-GATE 2: Tests Passing ❌ FAIL
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-
-Unit Tests:        45/47 passing (96%) - 2 failures ❌
-Integration Tests: 15/15 passing (100%) ✅
-E2E Tests:          7/8 passing (88%) - 1 failure ❌
-Coverage:          72% (below 80% target) ⚠️
-
-Test Failures:
-  ❌ test/auth/jwt.test.ts:42
-     Test: "Token expiry validation"
-     Reason: JWT expires immediately instead of after 1 hour
-     Impact: CRITICAL - security issue (tokens not working)
-     Fix: Update JWT_EXPIRY config from 0 to 3600
-
-  ❌ test/auth/rate-limit.test.ts:18
-     Test: "Rate limiting after 5 failed attempts"
-     Reason: Rate limiter not blocking after 5 attempts
-     Impact: CRITICAL - allows brute force attacks
-     Fix: Enable rate limiter middleware
-
-  ❌ test/e2e/login.spec.ts:28
-     Test: "User can log in with valid credentials"
-     Reason: Timeout waiting for redirect
-     Impact: HIGH - user experience broken
-     Fix: Increase timeout or fix slow redirect
-
-Coverage Issues:
-  ⚠️  src/auth/ - 72% (below 80% target)
-  Missing tests for:
-    - Password reset flow
-    - Social login edge cases
-
-Recommendation: ❌ CANNOT close increment
-  • Fix 3 critical test failures (JWT, rate limit, E2E login)
-  • Add tests for password reset flow (target: 80%+ coverage)
-  • Estimated effort: 3-4 hours
-```
-
-#### Step 4: Validate Gate 3 - Documentation Updated ✅
-
-**Checklist**:
-- [ ] CLAUDE.md updated with new features
-- [ ] README.md updated with usage examples
-- [ ] CHANGELOG.md updated (if public API changed)
-- [ ] API documentation regenerated (if applicable)
-- [ ] Inline code documentation complete
-- [ ] No stale references to old code
-
-**Scan files**:
-```bash
-Read: CLAUDE.md
-Read: README.md
-Read: CHANGELOG.md
-Grep: Search for references to new features
-```
-
-**Example PASS**:
-```
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-GATE 3: Documentation Updated ✅ PASS
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-
-CLAUDE.md:     ✅ Updated with authentication section
-               - Added "How to authenticate" guide
-               - Added JWT token usage examples
-               - Added troubleshooting section
-
-README.md:     ✅ Updated with authentication examples
-               - Added quick start with login example
-               - Added API authentication guide
-               - Updated installation instructions
-
-CHANGELOG.md:  ✅ v0.1.8 entry added
-               - Listed new authentication features
-               - Documented breaking changes (none)
-               - Added migration guide for existing users
-
-Inline Docs:   ✅ All public functions documented
-               - JSDoc comments on all auth functions
-               - Parameter descriptions complete
-               - Return types documented
-
-Status: ✅ PASS
-```
-
-**Example FAIL**:
-```
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-GATE 3: Documentation Updated ❌ FAIL
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-
-CLAUDE.md:     ❌ Missing authentication section
-               - No mention of new auth features
-               - Users won't know how to authenticate
-
-README.md:     ❌ No authentication examples
-               - Quick start still shows old login flow
-               - API examples don't include auth headers
-
-CHANGELOG.md:  ❌ v0.1.8 entry missing
-               - No mention of authentication feature
-               - Breaking changes not documented
-               - Users won't know what changed
-
-Inline Docs:   ⚠️  Partial (60% of functions documented)
-               - Missing JSDoc on: login(), validateToken(), refreshToken()
-               - Parameter descriptions incomplete
-               - Return types not specified
-
-Recommendation: ❌ CANNOT close increment
-  • Update CLAUDE.md with authentication section (1 hour)
-  • Add authentication examples to README.md (30 min)
-  • Create CHANGELOG.md v0.1.8 entry (15 min)
-  • Document missing auth functions (30 min)
-  • Total estimated effort: 2 hours 15 min
-```
-
-#### Step 5: PM Decision
-
-**If ALL 3 gates pass** ✅:
-```
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-PM VALIDATION RESULT: ✅ READY TO CLOSE
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-
-✅ Gate 1: Tasks Completed (100% P1, 89% P2)
-✅ Gate 2: Tests Passing (70/70 tests, 89% coverage)
-✅ Gate 3: Documentation Updated (all files current)
-
-Business Value Delivered:
-  • User authentication system with email/password login
-  • JWT token-based session management
-  • Rate limiting (5 attempts / 15 min)
-  • Secure password hashing (bcrypt, 12 rounds)
-  • API authentication middleware
-  • Comprehensive test coverage (89%)
-
-Acceptance Criteria Met:
-  ✅ AC-US1-01: User can log in with email and password
-  ✅ AC-US1-02: Invalid credentials show error message
-  ✅ AC-US1-03: After 5 failed attempts, account locked
-  ✅ AC-US1-04: Session persists across page refreshes
-  ✅ AC-US1-05: Logout clears session
-
-PM Approval: ✅ APPROVED for closure
-
-Next steps:
-  1. Update increment status: in-progress → completed
-  2. Set completion date: {current-date}
-  3. Generate completion report
-  4. Transfer deferred P2 tasks to backlog:
-     - T014: Add social login → New increment
-     - T017: Add password reset email → New increment
-  5. Update living docs with new feature documentation
-  6. Celebrate! 🎉
-```
-
-**If ANY gate fails** ❌:
-```
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-PM VALIDATION RESULT: ❌ NOT READY TO CLOSE
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-
-❌ Gate 1: Tasks Completion - FAIL (2 critical tasks incomplete)
-❌ Gate 2: Tests Passing - FAIL (3 test failures, 72% coverage)
-❌ Gate 3: Documentation Updated - FAIL (missing docs)
-
-PM Decision: ❌ CANNOT close increment
-
-Blockers (must fix before closure):
-  1. Complete T005 (password hashing) - 2 hours
-  2. Complete T008 (JWT validation) - 3 hours
-  3. Fix JWT expiry test failure - 30 min
-  4. Fix rate limiter test failure - 1 hour
-  5. Fix E2E login test - 1 hour
-  6. Update CLAUDE.md with auth section - 1 hour
-  7. Add README.md auth examples - 30 min
-  8. Create CHANGELOG.md entry - 15 min
-
-Total estimated effort to fix: 9 hours 15 min
-
-Action Plan:
-  1. TODAY (4 hours):
-     • Fix test failures (2.5 hours)
-     • Complete T005 password hashing (2 hours)
-     • Document auth section in CLAUDE.md (1 hour)
-
-  2. TOMORROW (5 hours):
-     • Complete T008 JWT validation (3 hours)
-     • Update README with examples (30 min)
-     • Add CHANGELOG entry (15 min)
-     • Re-run full test suite (30 min)
-     • Re-run /done for validation (30 min)
-
-  3. Re-validate: Run /done {increment-id} after fixes complete
-
-Increment status: Remains in-progress
-```
-
----
-
-## Scope Creep Detection
-
-**Trigger**: Tasks.md has significantly more tasks than originally planned
-
-**Analysis**:
-```
-🤔 PM Analysis: Scope creep detected
-
-Original plan (spec.md): 42 tasks estimated (3-4 weeks)
-Current state (tasks.md): 55 tasks (3 weeks elapsed, 13 tasks added)
-
-Breakdown:
-  Original P1 tasks: 12/12 completed ✅
-  Original P2 tasks: 18/18 completed ✅
-  Original P3 tasks: 12/12 completed ✅
-  ADDED tasks (new): 13/13 completed ✅
-
-New tasks added during implementation:
-  • T043: Add password strength indicator (P3 - UX enhancement)
-  • T044: Add "remember me" checkbox (P3 - user request)
-  • T045: Add session timeout warning (P2 - security improvement)
-  • T046-T055: Additional edge case tests (P3)
-
-Options:
-  A) Accept scope growth - Close with all 55 tasks ✅
-     Pro: Complete feature set delivered
-     Con: Took longer than planned (3 weeks vs 2 weeks)
-
-  B) Move new tasks to next increment - Close with 42 tasks
-     Pro: Meets original timeline commitment
-     Con: Defers valuable improvements
-
-  C) Re-plan as 2 increments (recommended) ✅
-     • Increment 0042: Core authentication (42 tasks) - Close now
-     • Increment 0043: Auth enhancements (13 tasks) - New increment
-
-Recommendation: Option A or C
-
-  Option A: All 55 tasks are complete and valuable. Close now.
-  - Business value delivered: Full authentication + enhancements
-  - Timeline: 1 week over estimate (acceptable for MVP)
-
-  Option C: Split scope for cleaner tracking
-  - Core auth: Close as 0042 (original scope complete)
-  - Enhancements: Create 0043 (new improvements)
-
-Your preference: [A/B/C]?
-```
-
-**Best Practice**:
-- **Accept scope growth** if new tasks add clear value
-- **Split into 2 increments** if scope doubled or tripled
-- **Document lessons learned** to improve future estimates
-
----
-
-## Validation Templates
-
-### Gate 1: Tasks Completion Template
-
-```
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-GATE 1: Tasks Completion {✅ PASS | ❌ FAIL}
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-
-Priority P1 (Critical):    {X}/{Y} completed ({%}%)
-Priority P2 (Important):   {X}/{Y} completed ({%}%)
-Priority P3 (Nice-to-have): {X}/{Y} completed ({%}%)
-
-{IF ANY INCOMPLETE P1 TASKS:}
-Incomplete P1 tasks:
-  ❌ {task-id}: {task-name} ({reason})
-     Estimated effort: {X hours}
-     Risk: {impact-description}
-
-{IF DEFERRED P2 TASKS:}
-Deferred P2 tasks:
-  ⏳ {task-id}: {task-name} - Moved to increment {####}
-
-Status: {✅ PASS | ❌ FAIL}
-{IF FAIL:}
-Recommendation: ❌ CANNOT close increment
-  • {list-of-required-fixes}
-```
-
-### Gate 2: Tests Passing Template
-
-```
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-GATE 2: Tests Passing {✅ PASS | ❌ FAIL}
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-
-Unit Tests:        {X}/{Y} passing ({%}%) {✅|❌}
-Integration Tests: {X}/{Y} passing ({%}%) {✅|❌}
-E2E Tests:         {X}/{Y} passing ({%}%) {✅|❌}
-Coverage:          {%}% ({above|below} {target}% target) {✅|❌|⚠️}
-
-{IF FAILURES:}
-Test Failures:
-  ❌ {test-file}:{line}
-     Test: "{test-name}"
-     Reason: {failure-reason}
-     Impact: {CRITICAL|HIGH|MEDIUM} - {description}
-     Fix: {suggested-fix}
-
-{IF COVERAGE BELOW TARGET:}
-Coverage Issues:
-  ⚠️  {module} - {%}% (below {target}% target)
-  Missing tests for:
-    - {scenario-1}
-    - {scenario-2}
-
-Status: {✅ PASS | ❌ FAIL}
-{IF FAIL:}
-Recommendation: ❌ CANNOT close increment
-  • {list-of-required-fixes}
-  • Estimated effort: {X hours}
-```
-
-### Gate 3: Documentation Template
-
-```
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-GATE 3: Documentation Updated {✅ PASS | ❌ FAIL}
-━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━
-
-CLAUDE.md:     {✅|❌} {status-description}
-               {details-of-updates-or-missing}
-
-README.md:     {✅|❌} {status-description}
-               {details-of-updates-or-missing}
-
-CHANGELOG.md:  {✅|❌} {status-description}
-               {details-of-updates-or-missing}
-
-Inline Docs:   {✅|❌|⚠️} {status-description}
-               {details-of-coverage}
-
-Status: {✅ PASS | ❌ FAIL}
-{IF FAIL:}
-Recommendation: ❌ CANNOT close increment
-  • {list-of-documentation-tasks}
-  • Total estimated effort: {X hours}
-```
-
----
-
-## Best Practices
-
-### 1. Never Bypass Validation
-
-All 3 gates must pass. No exceptions. Quality is non-negotiable.
-
-### 2. Be Specific in Feedback
-
-Tell users exactly what's missing and how to fix it. Include:
-- File paths
-- Line numbers
-- Specific test failures
-- Estimated effort to fix
-
-### 3. Estimate Effort Realistically
-
-Help users understand time to completion:
-- Small fixes: < 1 hour
-- Medium fixes: 1-3 hours
-- Large fixes: 4-8 hours
-
-### 4. Detect Scope Creep Early
-
-If tasks.md grows significantly, investigate:
-- Were new requirements discovered?
-- Did original estimate underestimate complexity?
-- Should scope be split across multiple increments?
-
-### 5. Document Business Value
-
-When approving closure, summarize what was delivered:
-- Features implemented
-- Acceptance criteria met
-- User value provided
-
----
-
-## Related Skills & Commands
-
-### Skills
-- **increment-planner**: Creates increment spec.md with acceptance criteria
-- **test-aware-planner**: Generates tasks.md with embedded tests
-- **architect**: Designs technical solution (plan.md)
-
-### Commands
-- `/sw:done {increment-id}` - Trigger PM closure validation
-- `/sw:status {increment-id}` - Check increment status
-- `/sw:validate {increment-id}` - Run validation checks
-- `/sw:check-tests {increment-id}` - Validate test coverage
-
----
-
-**Remember**: I'm here to ensure quality, not to block progress. If an increment isn't ready, I'll tell you exactly what needs fixing and how long it will take. My goal is to ship high-quality increments that deliver real value.
-
-