specsmd 0.1.63 → 0.1.65
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/flows/fire/agents/builder/agent.md +6 -0
- package/flows/fire/agents/builder/skills/run-execute/SKILL.md +75 -21
- package/flows/fire/agents/builder/skills/run-execute/scripts/complete-run.cjs +37 -4
- package/flows/fire/agents/builder/skills/run-plan/SKILL.md +12 -0
- package/flows/fire/agents/builder/skills/walkthrough-generate/SKILL.md +108 -22
- package/flows/fire/agents/builder/skills/walkthrough-generate/templates/walkthrough.md.hbs +68 -0
- package/flows/ideation/README.md +35 -0
- package/flows/ideation/agents/orchestrator/agent.md +103 -0
- package/flows/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/flame/SKILL.md +132 -0
- package/flows/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/flame/references/evaluation-criteria.md +81 -0
- package/flows/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/flame/references/six-hats-method.md +87 -0
- package/flows/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/flame/templates/flame-report.md.hbs +81 -0
- package/flows/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/forge/SKILL.md +153 -0
- package/flows/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/forge/references/disney-method.md +94 -0
- package/flows/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/forge/references/pitch-framework.md +87 -0
- package/flows/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/forge/templates/concept-brief.md.hbs +83 -0
- package/flows/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/spark/SKILL.md +152 -0
- package/flows/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/spark/references/anti-bias.md +43 -0
- package/flows/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/spark/references/techniques/analogy.md +60 -0
- package/flows/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/spark/references/techniques/first-principles.md +56 -0
- package/flows/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/spark/references/techniques/index.yaml +76 -0
- package/flows/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/spark/references/techniques/inversion.md +52 -0
- package/flows/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/spark/references/techniques/questorming.md +57 -0
- package/flows/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/spark/references/techniques/random-word.md +35 -0
- package/flows/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/spark/references/techniques/scamper.md +67 -0
- package/flows/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/spark/references/techniques/what-if.md +55 -0
- package/flows/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/spark/templates/spark-bank.md.hbs +72 -0
- package/flows/ideation/commands/flame.md +43 -0
- package/flows/ideation/commands/forge.md +43 -0
- package/flows/ideation/commands/ideation.md +51 -0
- package/flows/ideation/commands/spark.md +43 -0
- package/flows/ideation/memory-bank.yaml +177 -0
- package/flows/ideation/quick-start.md +84 -0
- package/flows/ideation/shared/protocols/anti-bias.md +79 -0
- package/flows/ideation/shared/protocols/deep-thinking.md +92 -0
- package/flows/ideation/shared/protocols/diverge-converge.md +72 -0
- package/flows/ideation/shared/protocols/interaction-adaptation.md +88 -0
- package/lib/constants.js +5 -0
- package/lib/dashboard/fire/parser.js +0 -1
- package/lib/dashboard/tui/file-entries.js +5 -4
- package/package.json +1 -1
|
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Inversion Technique
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
**Origin**: Charlie Munger's "invert, always invert" principle; also found in de Bono's lateral thinking and Osborn's reversal prompters.
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
**Interaction type**: Generate — AI inverts assumptions, user reacts to the resulting ideas.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## How It Works
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. **State the goal** clearly
|
|
10
|
+
2. **Invert it** — ask "how would I achieve the exact opposite?"
|
|
11
|
+
3. **List the inversions** — what would guarantee failure, the worst experience, the opposite outcome?
|
|
12
|
+
4. **Reverse each inversion** — the opposite of each failure mode is often a non-obvious success strategy
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
## Inversion Patterns
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
### Goal Inversion
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
- Goal: "Make onboarding fast" → Inverted: "How to make onboarding take forever?"
|
|
19
|
+
- Answers: No documentation, no buddy system, surprise requirements → Ideas: Pre-arrival portal, day-1 buddy auto-match, zero-surprise checklist
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
### User Inversion
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
- Design for the opposite user: experts → beginners, individuals → teams, tech-savvy → tech-averse
|
|
24
|
+
- Forces empathy and reveals assumptions
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
### Process Inversion
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
- Reverse the order: What if the last step came first?
|
|
29
|
+
- End-to-outcome: Start with the desired result and work backward
|
|
30
|
+
- Often reveals unnecessary steps
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
### Value Inversion
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
- What if the biggest cost became the biggest feature?
|
|
35
|
+
- What if the bug became the selling point?
|
|
36
|
+
- Turns weaknesses into differentiators
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
### Anti-Problem
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
- Instead of solving the problem, make it irrelevant
|
|
41
|
+
- Instead of reducing friction, make the friction delightful
|
|
42
|
+
- Reframe rather than fix
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
## AI Application Notes
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
When using inversion internally:
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
1. Pick the most interesting inversion pattern for the current topic
|
|
49
|
+
2. Actually go through the full inversion (state goal → invert → list failure modes → reverse)
|
|
50
|
+
3. The best ideas come from reversing *non-obvious* failure modes
|
|
51
|
+
4. Present the resulting ideas without explaining the inversion process
|
|
52
|
+
5. Excellent for batch #2+ when initial ideas feel too "safe"
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Questorming Technique
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
**Origin**: Hal Gregersen's "Question Burst" methodology; also related to Osborn's principle of exploring the problem space before solving.
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
**Interaction type**: Co-build — AI generates questions, user identifies the most important ones, AI builds ideas from those.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## How It Works
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. **State the topic** without any solutions in mind
|
|
10
|
+
2. **Generate questions only** — no answers allowed during this phase
|
|
11
|
+
3. **Aim for 15-20 questions** in rapid succession
|
|
12
|
+
4. **Categorize** — which questions challenge assumptions? Which reframe the problem?
|
|
13
|
+
5. **Select the most provocative questions** — these become the seed for new ideas
|
|
14
|
+
6. **Generate ideas** from the selected questions
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
## Question Types
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
### Assumption-Challenging
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
- Why do we assume [X] is necessary?
|
|
21
|
+
- What if [commonly accepted truth] were false?
|
|
22
|
+
- Who said this has to be done by [conventional actor]?
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
### Scope-Shifting
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
- What if we zoom out 10x — what's the bigger problem?
|
|
27
|
+
- What if we zoom in 10x — what's the specific pain point?
|
|
28
|
+
- What would this look like from the customer's customer's perspective?
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
### Stakeholder Questions
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
- Who benefits from the current broken state?
|
|
33
|
+
- Who would lose if we solved this perfectly?
|
|
34
|
+
- Who has already solved this in a different context?
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
### Temporal Questions
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
- Why hasn't this been solved yet?
|
|
39
|
+
- What will make this irrelevant in 5 years?
|
|
40
|
+
- What had to change for this to become solvable now?
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
### Provocative Questions
|
|
43
|
+
|
|
44
|
+
- What's the most expensive possible solution? The cheapest?
|
|
45
|
+
- What would a competitor do with this opportunity?
|
|
46
|
+
- What would a child suggest?
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
## AI Application Notes
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
When using questorming internally:
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
1. Generate a burst of 8-10 questions about the topic
|
|
53
|
+
2. Present 3-5 of the most provocative ones to the user
|
|
54
|
+
3. Ask: "Which of these feels most important?" (the one elicit moment)
|
|
55
|
+
4. If user doesn't engage, pick the most provocative question yourself (ai_fallback)
|
|
56
|
+
5. Generate ideas seeded from the selected question(s)
|
|
57
|
+
6. Best used when the problem space feels unclear or when the user says "I'm not sure what I want"
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Random Word Technique
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
**Origin**: Edward de Bono's lateral thinking toolkit. Forces connections between unrelated concepts.
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
**Interaction type**: Generate — AI selects random stimulus and forces connections.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## How It Works
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. **Select a random concept** from an unrelated domain (not a literal random word — pick a vivid, concrete thing)
|
|
10
|
+
2. **List its attributes** — what makes it interesting, how it works, what it's known for
|
|
11
|
+
3. **Force connections** — map each attribute to the ideation topic
|
|
12
|
+
4. **Develop the strongest connections** into full ideas
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
## Examples of Forcing Connections
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
**Topic**: Improving employee onboarding
|
|
17
|
+
**Random concept**: Coral reef
|
|
18
|
+
|
|
19
|
+
| Coral Reef Attribute | Forced Connection |
|
|
20
|
+
|---------------------|-------------------|
|
|
21
|
+
| Self-organizing ecosystem | Onboarding that self-organizes based on new hire's role and interests |
|
|
22
|
+
| Symbiotic relationships | Pair each new hire with a "symbiont" — someone from a different team |
|
|
23
|
+
| Builds slowly, lasts centuries | First-week foundations that compound over the entire tenure |
|
|
24
|
+
| Bleaches under stress | Early warning system when onboarding overwhelms |
|
|
25
|
+
| Attracts diverse species | Make onboarding a magnet event that existing employees want to attend |
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
## AI Application Notes
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
When using random-word internally:
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
1. Pick concepts from **distant domains** — nature, games, history, architecture, music
|
|
32
|
+
2. The more unrelated the concept, the more novel the connections
|
|
33
|
+
3. Generate at least 5 attribute-connections, then pick the 2-3 most surprising
|
|
34
|
+
4. Present only the resulting ideas — never mention "random word" or the stimulus process
|
|
35
|
+
5. This technique is excellent for breaking fixation when ideas are clustering
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,67 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# SCAMPER Technique
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
**Origin**: Bob Eberle, building on Alex Osborn's idea prompter checklists from *Applied Imagination* (1953).
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
**Interaction type**: Generate — AI applies transformations, user reacts.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## The Seven Operators
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
### S — Substitute
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
What can be substituted? Different materials, people, processes, components, approaches?
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
- Replace one element with something unexpected
|
|
14
|
+
- Swap the medium, channel, or context
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
### C — Combine
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
What can be combined? Blend two ideas, merge functions, mix purposes?
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
- Combine features from different domains
|
|
21
|
+
- Merge two user needs into one solution
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
### A — Adapt
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
What can be adapted from elsewhere? What analogies apply? What else is like this?
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
- Borrow solutions from other industries
|
|
28
|
+
- Adapt natural processes to the problem
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
### M — Modify (also: Magnify / Minimize)
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
What can be changed? Size, shape, color, meaning, frequency, intensity?
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
- Make it 10x bigger or smaller
|
|
35
|
+
- Change the speed, frequency, or intensity
|
|
36
|
+
- Alter the form factor entirely
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
### P — Put to Other Use
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
Can this serve a different purpose? New contexts? New users? New markets?
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
- Repurpose for a completely different audience
|
|
43
|
+
- Use the byproduct as the main product
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
### E — Eliminate
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
What can be removed? Simplify? What's non-essential?
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
- Remove the most complex component — what happens?
|
|
50
|
+
- Strip to the absolute minimum viable version
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
### R — Reverse (also: Rearrange)
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
What if the order were reversed? What if roles swapped? What if inside-out?
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
- Reverse the workflow
|
|
57
|
+
- Let the user become the provider
|
|
58
|
+
- Flip the value proposition
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
## AI Application Notes
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
When using SCAMPER internally:
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
1. Pick 2-3 operators per batch (not all 7 — that produces too-similar ideas)
|
|
65
|
+
2. Apply each operator to a **different domain** from the domain wheel
|
|
66
|
+
3. Make the result vivid and specific, not abstract
|
|
67
|
+
4. Never tell the user you're "using SCAMPER" — just present the transformed ideas
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# What-If Scenarios Technique
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
**Origin**: Assumption-challenging methodology found across creative problem solving traditions.
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
**Interaction type**: Generate — AI constructs scenarios, user reacts to the most interesting ones.
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
## How It Works
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
1. **Identify core assumptions** about the topic (explicit and implicit)
|
|
10
|
+
2. **Challenge each assumption** with a "what if" that negates or transforms it
|
|
11
|
+
3. **Explore the scenario** — what would the world look like if this were true?
|
|
12
|
+
4. **Extract ideas** from the alternate reality
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
## Types of What-If
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
### Constraint Removal
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
- What if money were no object?
|
|
19
|
+
- What if there were no technical limitations?
|
|
20
|
+
- What if you had unlimited time?
|
|
21
|
+
- What if there were no regulations?
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
### Constraint Inversion
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
- What if the user had to pay NOT to use it?
|
|
26
|
+
- What if it only worked for 5 minutes per day?
|
|
27
|
+
- What if it required 100 people to operate?
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
### Context Shift
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
- What if this existed in 1920? In 2120?
|
|
32
|
+
- What if this were designed for children? For astronauts? For animals?
|
|
33
|
+
- What if this operated underwater? In zero gravity? In complete darkness?
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
### Scale Shift
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
- What if 1 billion people used this simultaneously?
|
|
38
|
+
- What if it were the size of a building? A molecule?
|
|
39
|
+
- What if it lasted 100 years? 100 milliseconds?
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
### Role Reversal
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
- What if the customer built it and the company used it?
|
|
44
|
+
- What if the problem were actually the solution?
|
|
45
|
+
- What if success and failure metrics were swapped?
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
## AI Application Notes
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
When using what-if internally:
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
1. Identify 2-3 non-obvious assumptions about the topic
|
|
52
|
+
2. Pick the most interesting what-if type for each assumption
|
|
53
|
+
3. Briefly explore the scenario (2-3 sentences), then extract a concrete idea
|
|
54
|
+
4. Present only the ideas — mention the "what if" framing only if it makes the idea clearer
|
|
55
|
+
5. Best used when ideas are getting too conventional or practical
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
session: {{session_id}}
|
|
3
|
+
topic: "{{topic}}"
|
|
4
|
+
phase: spark
|
|
5
|
+
created: {{created}}
|
|
6
|
+
total_ideas: {{total_ideas}}
|
|
7
|
+
total_batches: {{total_batches}}
|
|
8
|
+
favorites_count: {{favorites_count}}
|
|
9
|
+
domains_covered: {{domains_covered}}
|
|
10
|
+
---
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
# Spark Bank: {{topic}}
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
> {{total_ideas}} ideas generated across {{total_batches}} batches, covering {{domains_covered}}/12 domains.
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
---
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
## Favorites
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
{{#each favorites}}
|
|
21
|
+
### {{id}} — {{title}}
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
{{description}}
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
*Domain: {{domain}}*
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
{{/each}}
|
|
28
|
+
|
|
29
|
+
{{#unless favorites}}
|
|
30
|
+
*No favorites selected yet.*
|
|
31
|
+
{{/unless}}
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
---
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
## All Ideas by Theme
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
{{#each themes}}
|
|
38
|
+
### {{name}}
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
{{#each ideas}}
|
|
41
|
+
**{{id}}** — **{{title}}**
|
|
42
|
+
{{description}}
|
|
43
|
+
{{#if is_favorite}}*(favorite)*{{/if}}
|
|
44
|
+
*Domain: {{domain}}*
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
{{/each}}
|
|
47
|
+
|
|
48
|
+
{{/each}}
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
---
|
|
51
|
+
|
|
52
|
+
## Domain Coverage
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
| Domain | Ideas | Coverage |
|
|
55
|
+
|--------|-------|----------|
|
|
56
|
+
{{#each domain_stats}}
|
|
57
|
+
| {{name}} | {{count}} | {{bar}} |
|
|
58
|
+
{{/each}}
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
---
|
|
61
|
+
|
|
62
|
+
## Session Stats
|
|
63
|
+
|
|
64
|
+
- **Batches generated**: {{total_batches}}
|
|
65
|
+
- **Total ideas**: {{total_ideas}}
|
|
66
|
+
- **Favorites**: {{favorites_count}}
|
|
67
|
+
- **Techniques used**: {{techniques_used}}
|
|
68
|
+
- **Provocations injected**: {{provocations_count}}
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
---
|
|
71
|
+
|
|
72
|
+
*Generated by specsmd Ideation Flow — Spark skill*
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Flame - multi-perspective idea evaluation and scoring
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
# Activate Flame
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
**Command**: `/specsmd-flame`
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
---
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Activation
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
You are now the **Ideation Orchestrator** in **Flame mode** for specsmd.
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
**IMMEDIATELY** read and adopt the persona from:
|
|
16
|
+
→ `.specsmd/ideation/agents/orchestrator/agent.md`
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
Then execute the Flame skill:
|
|
19
|
+
→ `.specsmd/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/flame/SKILL.md`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
---
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Critical First Steps
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
1. **Read Config**: `.specsmd/ideation/memory-bank.yaml`
|
|
26
|
+
2. **Read Interaction Protocol**: `.specsmd/ideation/shared/protocols/interaction-adaptation.md`
|
|
27
|
+
3. **If Spark Bank exists**: Load it and begin evaluation
|
|
28
|
+
4. **If ideas provided directly**: Accept them and begin evaluation
|
|
29
|
+
5. **If nothing**: Ask "Which ideas would you like to evaluate?"
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
---
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
## Routing Targets
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
- **Back to Orchestrator**: `/specsmd-ideation`
|
|
36
|
+
- **To Spark**: `/specsmd-spark`
|
|
37
|
+
- **To Forge**: `/specsmd-forge`
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
---
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
## Begin
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
Activate now. Read the Flame skill and start evaluating ideas.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Forge - shape top ideas into actionable concept briefs
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
# Activate Forge
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
**Command**: `/specsmd-forge`
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
---
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Activation
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
You are now the **Ideation Orchestrator** in **Forge mode** for specsmd.
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
**IMMEDIATELY** read and adopt the persona from:
|
|
16
|
+
→ `.specsmd/ideation/agents/orchestrator/agent.md`
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
Then execute the Forge skill:
|
|
19
|
+
→ `.specsmd/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/forge/SKILL.md`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
---
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Critical First Steps
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
1. **Read Config**: `.specsmd/ideation/memory-bank.yaml`
|
|
26
|
+
2. **Read Interaction Protocol**: `.specsmd/ideation/shared/protocols/interaction-adaptation.md`
|
|
27
|
+
3. **If Flame Report exists**: Load shortlisted ideas and begin shaping
|
|
28
|
+
4. **If ideas provided directly**: Accept them and begin shaping
|
|
29
|
+
5. **If nothing**: Ask "Which ideas would you like to develop into concepts?"
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
---
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
## Routing Targets
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
- **Back to Orchestrator**: `/specsmd-ideation`
|
|
36
|
+
- **To Spark**: `/specsmd-spark`
|
|
37
|
+
- **To Flame**: `/specsmd-flame`
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
---
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
## Begin
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
Activate now. Read the Forge skill and start shaping concepts.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Ideation Flow - creative idea generation, evaluation, and shaping
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
# Activate Ideation Flow
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
**Command**: `/specsmd-ideation`
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
---
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Activation
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
You are now the **Ideation Orchestrator** for specsmd.
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
**IMMEDIATELY** read and adopt the persona from:
|
|
16
|
+
→ `.specsmd/ideation/agents/orchestrator/agent.md`
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
---
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
## Critical First Steps
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
1. **Read Config**: `.specsmd/ideation/memory-bank.yaml`
|
|
23
|
+
2. **Check Sessions**: Look for active sessions in `.specs-ideation/sessions/`
|
|
24
|
+
3. **Route**:
|
|
25
|
+
- Topic provided → jump to Spark skill
|
|
26
|
+
- Ideas provided → jump to Flame skill
|
|
27
|
+
- Concepts provided → jump to Forge skill
|
|
28
|
+
- Nothing → ask "What would you like to explore ideas about?"
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
---
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
## Your Skills
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
- **Spark**: `.specsmd/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/spark/SKILL.md` → Generate ideas
|
|
35
|
+
- **Flame**: `.specsmd/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/flame/SKILL.md` → Evaluate ideas
|
|
36
|
+
- **Forge**: `.specsmd/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/forge/SKILL.md` → Shape concepts
|
|
37
|
+
|
|
38
|
+
---
|
|
39
|
+
|
|
40
|
+
## Shared Protocols
|
|
41
|
+
|
|
42
|
+
- **Anti-Bias**: `.specsmd/ideation/shared/protocols/anti-bias.md`
|
|
43
|
+
- **Deep Thinking**: `.specsmd/ideation/shared/protocols/deep-thinking.md`
|
|
44
|
+
- **Diverge-Converge**: `.specsmd/ideation/shared/protocols/diverge-converge.md`
|
|
45
|
+
- **Interaction Adaptation**: `.specsmd/ideation/shared/protocols/interaction-adaptation.md`
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
---
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
## Begin
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
Activate now. Read your agent definition and start ideating.
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
---
|
|
2
|
+
description: Spark - rapid idea generation with cross-domain diversity
|
|
3
|
+
---
|
|
4
|
+
|
|
5
|
+
# Activate Spark
|
|
6
|
+
|
|
7
|
+
**Command**: `/specsmd-spark`
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
---
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## Activation
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
You are now the **Ideation Orchestrator** in **Spark mode** for specsmd.
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
**IMMEDIATELY** read and adopt the persona from:
|
|
16
|
+
→ `.specsmd/ideation/agents/orchestrator/agent.md`
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
Then execute the Spark skill:
|
|
19
|
+
→ `.specsmd/ideation/agents/orchestrator/skills/spark/SKILL.md`
|
|
20
|
+
|
|
21
|
+
---
|
|
22
|
+
|
|
23
|
+
## Critical First Steps
|
|
24
|
+
|
|
25
|
+
1. **Read Config**: `.specsmd/ideation/memory-bank.yaml`
|
|
26
|
+
2. **Read Anti-Bias Protocol**: `.specsmd/ideation/shared/protocols/anti-bias.md`
|
|
27
|
+
3. **Read Deep Thinking Protocol**: `.specsmd/ideation/shared/protocols/deep-thinking.md`
|
|
28
|
+
4. **If topic provided**: Jump straight to generating the first batch
|
|
29
|
+
5. **If no topic**: Ask "What would you like to explore ideas about?" — then generate immediately
|
|
30
|
+
|
|
31
|
+
---
|
|
32
|
+
|
|
33
|
+
## Routing Targets
|
|
34
|
+
|
|
35
|
+
- **Back to Orchestrator**: `/specsmd-ideation`
|
|
36
|
+
- **To Flame**: `/specsmd-flame`
|
|
37
|
+
- **To Forge**: `/specsmd-forge`
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
---
|
|
40
|
+
|
|
41
|
+
## Begin
|
|
42
|
+
|
|
43
|
+
Activate now. Read the Spark skill and start generating ideas.
|