specrails-core 4.6.4 → 4.6.5

package/templates/skills/sr-refactor-recommender/SKILL.md

@@ -1,216 +0,0 @@
----
-name: sr-refactor-recommender
-description: "sr:refactor-recommender — Scan the codebase for refactoring opportunities ranked by impact/effort ratio. Optionally creates GitHub Issues for tracking."
-license: MIT
-compatibility: "Requires git."
-metadata:
-  author: specrails
-  version: "1.0"
----
-
-
-Scan the codebase for refactoring opportunities, score each by impact/effort ratio and VPC persona value, and optionally create GitHub Issues for the top findings in {{BACKLOG_PROVIDER_NAME}}.
-
-**Input:** `$ARGUMENTS` — optional: comma-separated paths to scope the analysis. Flags: `--dry-run` (print findings without creating issues).
-
----
-
-## Phase 0: Pre-flight
-
-Check whether the GitHub CLI is available:
-
-```bash
-{{BACKLOG_PREFLIGHT}}
-```
-
-Set `GH_AVAILABLE=true` if the command succeeds, `GH_AVAILABLE=false` otherwise. Do not stop — analysis proceeds regardless. Parse `--dry-run` from `$ARGUMENTS` and set `DRY_RUN=true` if present.
-
----
-
-## Phase 1: Scope
-
-Parse paths from `$ARGUMENTS` after stripping any flags. If no paths are provided, scan the entire repository.
-
-Always exclude the following from all analysis:
-
-- `node_modules/`
-- `.git/`
-- `.claude/`
-- `vendor/`
-- `dist/`
-- `build/`
-
----
-
-## Phase 1.5: VPC Context
-
-Check whether persona files exist at `.claude/agents/personas/`. This path is present in any repo that has run `/specrails:enrich`.
-
-```bash
-ls .claude/agents/personas/ 2>/dev/null
-```
-
-If the directory exists and contains persona files, set `VPC_AVAILABLE=true`. Otherwise set `VPC_AVAILABLE=false` and skip all VPC steps (they are optional enrichment, not blockers).
-
-When `VPC_AVAILABLE=true`, read each persona file and extract a compact VPC summary. For each persona record:
-
-- **name** — persona display name (e.g. "Alex — The Lead Dev")
-- **top_jobs** — up to 3 functional jobs relevant to code quality and maintainability
-- **critical_pains** — up to 3 pains marked Critical or High related to code reliability, complexity, or developer experience
-- **high_gains** — up to 3 gains marked High related to code clarity, speed, or confidence
-
-Store these as an in-memory `VPC_PROFILES` list. You will use it in Phase 3 to score persona fit.
-
----
-
-## Phase 2: Analysis
-
-Analyze the scoped files across six categories. For each finding record:
-
-- **file** — relative path
-- **line_range** — start and end line numbers
-- **current_snippet** — the problematic code as-is
-- **proposed_snippet** — concrete refactored version
-- **rationale** — one sentence explaining the improvement
-
-### Duplicate Code
-
-Find code blocks larger than 10 lines that are substantially similar across two or more files. Consolidation into a shared function or module is the expected refactoring.
-
-### Long Functions
-
-Find functions or methods exceeding 50 lines. Extraction into smaller, single-purpose functions is the expected refactoring.
-
-### Large Files
-
-Find files exceeding 300 lines. Splitting into cohesive modules is the expected refactoring.
-
-### Dead Code
-
-Find unused exports, unreferenced functions, and commented-out blocks that have not been active for the lifetime of the file. Deletion or archival is the expected refactoring.
-
-### Outdated Patterns
-
-Find deprecated APIs and old language syntax: `var` instead of `let`/`const`, callbacks instead of `async`/`await`, legacy framework APIs with documented replacements, etc. Modernisation to current idioms is the expected refactoring.
-
-### Complex Logic
-
-Find deeply nested conditionals (more than 3 levels) and functions with high cyclomatic complexity. Extraction, early-return guards, or strategy patterns are the expected refactoring.
-
----
-
-## Phase 3: Score and Rank
-
-Score every finding on three dimensions (1–5 each):
-
-- **Impact** — how much the refactoring improves code quality, readability, or maintainability
-- **Effort** — how hard the refactoring is to implement (1 = trivial, 5 = major)
-- **VPC Value** — how directly this refactoring addresses persona jobs, pains, or gains (1 = no relevance, 5 = resolves a critical persona pain or delivers a high-value gain). Set to 3 when `VPC_AVAILABLE=false`.
-
-**Scoring VPC Value** (only when `VPC_AVAILABLE=true`):
-
-For each finding, reason over `VPC_PROFILES`:
-
-- Does fixing this reduce a **Critical/High pain** for any persona? (e.g. complex logic → harder to trust AI output → Alex's "agents go off the rails" pain) → score 4–5
-- Does fixing this deliver a **High gain** for any persona? (e.g. extracting a function → cleaner API surface → easier onboarding → Sara's gain) → score 3–4
-- Is there indirect persona value? (e.g. dead code removal → smaller codebase → easier contributor review → Kai) → score 2–3
-- No clear persona relevance → score 1–2
-
-Assign one `vpc_value` integer per finding, and note the **primary persona** and **rationale** (one sentence).
-
-**Composite score**: `impact * 2 + (6 - effort) + vpc_value`. Higher is better.
-
-Sort all findings by composite score descending. If the same code block was flagged by multiple categories, keep only the highest-scored entry and discard the duplicates.
-
----
-
-## Phase 4: Create GitHub Issues
-
-Skip this phase if `GH_AVAILABLE=false` or `DRY_RUN=true`.
-
-First ensure the tracking labels exist:
-
-```bash
-gh label create "refactor-opportunity" --color "B60205" --force
-```
-
-Fetch existing open issues that already carry the label to avoid duplicates:
-
-```bash
-gh issue list --label "refactor-opportunity" --state open --limit 100 --json number,title
-```
-
-For each of the **top 5** findings (by composite score) that does not already have a matching open issue, create a GitHub Issue with the following body:
-
-```
-## Refactoring Opportunity: {description}
-
-**Category**: {category}
-**File**: {file}:{line_range}
-**Impact**: {impact}/5 | **Effort**: {effort}/5 | **Score**: {composite}
-{vpc_line}
-
-### Current Code
-```{lang}
-{current_snippet}
-```
-
-### Proposed Refactoring
-```{lang}
-{proposed_snippet}
-```
-
-### Rationale
-{rationale}
-
----
-_Generated by `/specrails:refactor-recommender` in {{PROJECT_NAME}}_
-```
-
-Where `{vpc_line}` is included only when `VPC_AVAILABLE=true`:
-`**VPC Value**: {vpc_value}/5 — {vpc_persona}: {vpc_rationale}`
-
----
-
-## Phase 5: Output Summary
-
-Print the following report:
-
-```
-## Refactoring Opportunities — {{PROJECT_NAME}}
-
-{N} opportunities found | Sorted by composite score
-{vpc_header}
-
-| # | Category | File | Impact | Effort | VPC | Score | Description |
-|---|----------|------|--------|--------|-----|-------|-------------|
-| 1 | {category} | {file}:{line_range} | {impact}/5 | {effort}/5 | {vpc_value}/5 | {composite} | {description} |
-...
-
-### Top 3 Detailed Recommendations
-
-#### 1. {description}
-**File**: {file}:{line_range}
-**Category**: {category} | **Score**: {composite}
-{vpc_detail}
-
-**Current:**
-```{lang}
-{current_snippet}
-```
-
-**Proposed:**
-```{lang}
-{proposed_snippet}
-```
-
-**Rationale:** {rationale}
-
-(repeat for #2 and #3)
-
-Issues created: {N}  (or "dry-run: no issues created")
-```
-
-Where:
-- `{vpc_header}` is `VPC personas loaded: {persona names}` when `VPC_AVAILABLE=true`, or `VPC personas: not found (run /specrails:enrich to enable)` otherwise.
-- `{vpc_detail}` is `**VPC Value**: {vpc_value}/5 — {vpc_persona}: {vpc_rationale}` when `VPC_AVAILABLE=true`, omitted otherwise.

package/templates/skills/sr-why/SKILL.md

@@ -1,106 +0,0 @@
----
-name: sr-why
-description: "sr:why — Search explanation records written by specrails agents during the OpenSpec implementation pipeline."
-license: MIT
-compatibility: "Requires git."
-metadata:
-  author: specrails
-  version: "1.0"
----
-
-# /specrails:why — In-Context Help
-
-Searches explanation records written by sr-architect, sr-developer, and sr-reviewer agents
-during the OpenSpec implementation pipeline.
-
-Records are stored in `.claude/agent-memory/explanations/` as Markdown files with
-YAML frontmatter (agent, feature, tags, date).
-
-**Usage:**
-- `/specrails:why` — list the 20 most recent explanation records
-- `/specrails:why <query>` — search records by keyword or tag
-
----
-
-## Step 1: Find explanation records
-
-Glob all files matching `.claude/agent-memory/explanations/*.md`.
-
-If the directory does not exist or contains no files:
-Print:
-```
-No explanation records found yet.
-
-Explanation records are written by the sr-architect, sr-developer, and sr-reviewer agents
-when they make significant decisions during feature implementation.
-
-Run `/specrails:implement` on a feature to generate your first explanation records.
-```
-Then stop.
-
-## Step 2: Handle no-argument mode (listing)
-
-If `$ARGUMENTS` is empty:
-
-Read each explanation record file. Extract from frontmatter: `date`, `agent`, `feature`, `tags`.
-Extract the first sentence of the `## Decision` section as the decision summary.
-
-Sort records by `date` descending. Print the 20 most recent as a Markdown table:
-
-```
-## Recent Explanation Records
-
-| Date | Agent | Feature | Tags | Decision |
-|------|-------|---------|------|----------|
-| 2026-03-14 | sr-architect | in-context-help | [templates, commands] | Chose flat directory over per-agent subdirectories. |
-| ...  | ...   | ...     | ...  | ...      |
-```
-
-Then stop.
-
-## Step 3: Handle query mode (search)
-
-If `$ARGUMENTS` is non-empty, treat the full string as the search query.
-
-For each explanation record file:
-1. Read the full file content
-2. Score the record against the query:
-   - Filename contains a query word: +3 points per matching word
-   - Frontmatter `tags` array contains an exact query word: +3 points per matching tag
-   - Frontmatter `feature` contains a query word: +2 points
-   - Body text contains a query word: +1 point per occurrence (case-insensitive)
-3. Sum the score
-
-Sort records by score descending. Take the top 5 records with score > 0.
-
-If no records score > 0:
-Print:
-```
-No explanation records match "<query>".
-```
-Then list all unique tags from existing records:
-```
-## Available Tags
-
-[sorted list of all unique tags from all explanation records]
-
-Try `/specrails:why <tag>` with one of the tags above, or `/specrails:why` to browse all records.
-```
-
-If records match, print each matching record in full, separated by `---`:
-
-```
-## Results for "<query>" (N matches)
-
----
-
-**[date] [agent] — [feature]**
-Tags: [tag1, tag2]
-
-[full record body]
-
----
-
-**[date] [agent] — [feature]**
-...
-```