specdacular 0.2.0 → 0.2.2
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/commands/specd/discuss-feature.md +64 -0
- package/commands/specd/help.md +61 -6
- package/commands/specd/new-feature.md +32 -40
- package/commands/specd/plan-feature.md +69 -0
- package/commands/specd/research-feature.md +457 -0
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/specdacular/agents/feature-researcher.md +289 -0
- package/specdacular/templates/features/CONTEXT.md +81 -0
- package/specdacular/templates/features/DECISIONS.md +109 -0
- package/specdacular/templates/features/FEATURE.md +46 -27
- package/specdacular/templates/features/PLAN.md +153 -0
- package/specdacular/templates/features/RESEARCH.md +183 -0
- package/specdacular/templates/features/ROADMAP.md +59 -26
- package/specdacular/templates/features/STATE.md +59 -30
- package/specdacular/workflows/discuss-feature.md +388 -0
- package/specdacular/workflows/map-codebase.md +72 -10
- package/specdacular/workflows/new-feature.md +201 -262
- package/specdacular/workflows/plan-feature.md +501 -0
- package/specdacular/workflows/research-feature.md +252 -0
- package/specdacular/templates/features/REQUIREMENTS.md +0 -55
|
@@ -0,0 +1,252 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
<purpose>
|
|
2
|
+
Research how to implement a feature by spawning parallel agents for different research dimensions.
|
|
3
|
+
|
|
4
|
+
Uses three parallel research tracks:
|
|
5
|
+
1. **Codebase Integration** - Claude Code Explore agent investigates existing code
|
|
6
|
+
2. **External Patterns** - General-purpose agent researches libraries, patterns, approaches
|
|
7
|
+
3. **Pitfalls** - General-purpose agent researches what goes wrong
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
Output: Single synthesized RESEARCH.md that the planner consumes.
|
|
10
|
+
</purpose>
|
|
11
|
+
|
|
12
|
+
<philosophy>
|
|
13
|
+
|
|
14
|
+
## Research Serves Planning
|
|
15
|
+
|
|
16
|
+
Every finding must be actionable. "Use Zustand" is useless. "Use Zustand 4.5+, create store in src/store/{feature}.ts following pattern from src/store/user.ts" is actionable.
|
|
17
|
+
|
|
18
|
+
## Codebase First
|
|
19
|
+
|
|
20
|
+
The most valuable research is understanding how this fits with existing code. External patterns matter, but integration patterns matter more.
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
## Verification Required
|
|
23
|
+
|
|
24
|
+
Don't trust Claude's training data for library versions or APIs. Verify with Context7 or official docs. Mark unverified findings as LOW confidence.
|
|
25
|
+
|
|
26
|
+
## Decisions Get Recorded
|
|
27
|
+
|
|
28
|
+
Any choice made during research (library selection, pattern choice, architecture decision) goes into DECISIONS.md with rationale.
|
|
29
|
+
|
|
30
|
+
</philosophy>
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
<research_dimensions>
|
|
33
|
+
|
|
34
|
+
## Dimension 1: Codebase Integration
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
36
|
+
**Agent:** Claude Code Explore (subagent_type="Explore")
|
|
37
|
+
**Purpose:** Understand how feature integrates with existing code
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
**Investigates:**
|
|
40
|
+
- What modules/files to import from
|
|
41
|
+
- What patterns similar features follow
|
|
42
|
+
- Where new files should be created
|
|
43
|
+
- What types/interfaces to reuse
|
|
44
|
+
- What utilities/hooks already exist
|
|
45
|
+
|
|
46
|
+
**Output format:**
|
|
47
|
+
```markdown
|
|
48
|
+
## Codebase Integration Findings
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
### Import Dependencies
|
|
51
|
+
- `src/lib/auth.ts` — provides `getSession()`, needed for user context
|
|
52
|
+
- `src/types/user.ts` — provides `User` type, needed for type safety
|
|
53
|
+
|
|
54
|
+
### Patterns to Follow
|
|
55
|
+
- **API routes:** Follow pattern in `src/app/api/users/route.ts`
|
|
56
|
+
- Use `getServerSession` for auth
|
|
57
|
+
- Return `Response.json()` with proper status codes
|
|
58
|
+
- Validate input with zod
|
|
59
|
+
|
|
60
|
+
### File Locations
|
|
61
|
+
New files:
|
|
62
|
+
- `src/app/api/{feature}/route.ts` — API endpoint
|
|
63
|
+
- `src/components/{Feature}/index.tsx` — Main component
|
|
64
|
+
- `src/hooks/use{Feature}.ts` — Data hook
|
|
65
|
+
- `src/types/{feature}.ts` — Type definitions
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
Modify:
|
|
68
|
+
- `src/app/layout.tsx` — Add provider if needed
|
|
69
|
+
|
|
70
|
+
### Reusable Code
|
|
71
|
+
Types:
|
|
72
|
+
- @src/types/common.ts — `ApiResponse<T>`, `PaginatedResponse<T>`
|
|
73
|
+
|
|
74
|
+
Utilities:
|
|
75
|
+
- @src/lib/fetcher.ts — `fetcher()` for SWR
|
|
76
|
+
- @src/lib/validation.ts — zod schemas
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
Components:
|
|
79
|
+
- @src/components/ui/Button — existing button component
|
|
80
|
+
- @src/components/ui/Input — existing input component
|
|
81
|
+
|
|
82
|
+
### Integration Points
|
|
83
|
+
- Auth: Use `getServerSession` from `@/lib/auth`
|
|
84
|
+
- Database: Use `db` from `@/lib/db`
|
|
85
|
+
- State: Create store in `src/store/` following existing pattern
|
|
86
|
+
```
|
|
87
|
+
|
|
88
|
+
## Dimension 2: External Patterns
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
**Agent:** general-purpose with feature-researcher instructions
|
|
91
|
+
**Purpose:** Research standard approaches, libraries, patterns
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
**Investigates:**
|
|
94
|
+
- Standard libraries for this feature type
|
|
95
|
+
- Architecture patterns that work well
|
|
96
|
+
- Code patterns and examples
|
|
97
|
+
- What NOT to hand-roll
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
**Tool strategy:**
|
|
100
|
+
1. Context7 first for any library
|
|
101
|
+
2. Official docs via WebFetch
|
|
102
|
+
3. WebSearch with current year
|
|
103
|
+
4. Verify everything
|
|
104
|
+
|
|
105
|
+
**Output format:**
|
|
106
|
+
```markdown
|
|
107
|
+
## External Patterns Findings
|
|
108
|
+
|
|
109
|
+
### Standard Stack
|
|
110
|
+
| Library | Version | Purpose | Confidence |
|
|
111
|
+
|---------|---------|---------|------------|
|
|
112
|
+
| zod | 3.22+ | Input validation | HIGH (Context7) |
|
|
113
|
+
| swr | 2.2+ | Data fetching | HIGH (Context7) |
|
|
114
|
+
|
|
115
|
+
### Architecture Pattern
|
|
116
|
+
**Pattern:** Feature-based modules
|
|
117
|
+
**Why:** Keeps related code together, easier to maintain
|
|
118
|
+
**Structure:**
|
|
119
|
+
```
|
|
120
|
+
src/features/{name}/
|
|
121
|
+
├── api.ts # API calls
|
|
122
|
+
├── hooks.ts # React hooks
|
|
123
|
+
├── types.ts # TypeScript types
|
|
124
|
+
├── components/ # UI components
|
|
125
|
+
└── index.ts # Public exports
|
|
126
|
+
```
|
|
127
|
+
|
|
128
|
+
### Code Patterns
|
|
129
|
+
|
|
130
|
+
**Data fetching with SWR:**
|
|
131
|
+
```typescript
|
|
132
|
+
// Source: Context7 - swr
|
|
133
|
+
export function use{Feature}() {
|
|
134
|
+
const { data, error, isLoading, mutate } = useSWR<{Feature}[]>(
|
|
135
|
+
'/api/{feature}',
|
|
136
|
+
fetcher
|
|
137
|
+
)
|
|
138
|
+
return { items: data, error, isLoading, refresh: mutate }
|
|
139
|
+
}
|
|
140
|
+
```
|
|
141
|
+
|
|
142
|
+
### Don't Hand-Roll
|
|
143
|
+
| Problem | Use Instead | Why |
|
|
144
|
+
|---------|-------------|-----|
|
|
145
|
+
| Form validation | zod + react-hook-form | Edge cases, error messages |
|
|
146
|
+
| Data fetching | SWR or React Query | Caching, revalidation, race conditions |
|
|
147
|
+
| Date formatting | date-fns | Timezone handling, localization |
|
|
148
|
+
```
|
|
149
|
+
|
|
150
|
+
## Dimension 3: Pitfalls
|
|
151
|
+
|
|
152
|
+
**Agent:** general-purpose with feature-researcher instructions
|
|
153
|
+
**Purpose:** Research what commonly goes wrong
|
|
154
|
+
|
|
155
|
+
**Investigates:**
|
|
156
|
+
- Common implementation mistakes
|
|
157
|
+
- Performance pitfalls
|
|
158
|
+
- Security issues
|
|
159
|
+
- Integration gotchas
|
|
160
|
+
|
|
161
|
+
**Output format:**
|
|
162
|
+
```markdown
|
|
163
|
+
## Pitfalls Findings
|
|
164
|
+
|
|
165
|
+
### Critical (causes failures/rewrites)
|
|
166
|
+
|
|
167
|
+
**Race conditions in data fetching**
|
|
168
|
+
- Why it happens: Multiple rapid requests, stale closures
|
|
169
|
+
- Prevention: Use SWR/React Query, they handle this
|
|
170
|
+
- Detection: Data flickers, wrong data after navigation
|
|
171
|
+
|
|
172
|
+
**Missing auth checks on API routes**
|
|
173
|
+
- Why it happens: Forget to add auth middleware
|
|
174
|
+
- Prevention: Auth check first line of every handler
|
|
175
|
+
- Detection: Unauthenticated access succeeds
|
|
176
|
+
|
|
177
|
+
### Moderate (causes bugs/debt)
|
|
178
|
+
|
|
179
|
+
**Type mismatches between API and client**
|
|
180
|
+
- Why it happens: Types defined separately, drift over time
|
|
181
|
+
- Prevention: Single source of truth for types, use zod inference
|
|
182
|
+
- Detection: Runtime errors, TypeScript errors after API changes
|
|
183
|
+
|
|
184
|
+
### Minor (causes friction)
|
|
185
|
+
|
|
186
|
+
**Inconsistent error handling**
|
|
187
|
+
- Why it happens: Different patterns in different places
|
|
188
|
+
- Prevention: Create `handleApiError` utility, use everywhere
|
|
189
|
+
- Detection: Error messages vary in format/location
|
|
190
|
+
```
|
|
191
|
+
|
|
192
|
+
</research_dimensions>
|
|
193
|
+
|
|
194
|
+
<synthesis>
|
|
195
|
+
|
|
196
|
+
## Combining Research
|
|
197
|
+
|
|
198
|
+
After all agents complete, synthesize into RESEARCH.md:
|
|
199
|
+
|
|
200
|
+
1. **Summary** - Key findings across all dimensions
|
|
201
|
+
2. **Codebase Integration** - Full findings from Explore agent
|
|
202
|
+
3. **Implementation Approach** - External patterns, adapted for this codebase
|
|
203
|
+
4. **Pitfalls** - All pitfalls with task-specific warnings
|
|
204
|
+
5. **Confidence Assessment** - Honest evaluation of each area
|
|
205
|
+
6. **Open Questions** - What couldn't be resolved
|
|
206
|
+
|
|
207
|
+
## Recording Decisions
|
|
208
|
+
|
|
209
|
+
During synthesis, identify any decisions that were made:
|
|
210
|
+
|
|
211
|
+
- Library choice → DEC-XXX with rationale
|
|
212
|
+
- Pattern choice → DEC-XXX with rationale
|
|
213
|
+
- Architecture choice → DEC-XXX with rationale
|
|
214
|
+
|
|
215
|
+
Add all to DECISIONS.md with:
|
|
216
|
+
- Date
|
|
217
|
+
- Context (from research)
|
|
218
|
+
- Decision
|
|
219
|
+
- Rationale (from findings)
|
|
220
|
+
- Implications (for implementation)
|
|
221
|
+
- References (sources used)
|
|
222
|
+
|
|
223
|
+
</synthesis>
|
|
224
|
+
|
|
225
|
+
<quality_gates>
|
|
226
|
+
|
|
227
|
+
## Before Spawning Agents
|
|
228
|
+
|
|
229
|
+
- [ ] Feature exists with FEATURE.md
|
|
230
|
+
- [ ] Codebase docs available (.specd/codebase/)
|
|
231
|
+
- [ ] Research dimensions identified
|
|
232
|
+
|
|
233
|
+
## After Each Agent
|
|
234
|
+
|
|
235
|
+
- [ ] Findings are specific (file paths, versions, code examples)
|
|
236
|
+
- [ ] Confidence levels assigned
|
|
237
|
+
- [ ] Sources cited
|
|
238
|
+
|
|
239
|
+
## Before Writing RESEARCH.md
|
|
240
|
+
|
|
241
|
+
- [ ] All agents completed
|
|
242
|
+
- [ ] Findings synthesized (not just concatenated)
|
|
243
|
+
- [ ] Conflicts resolved
|
|
244
|
+
- [ ] Decisions extracted
|
|
245
|
+
|
|
246
|
+
## Before Committing
|
|
247
|
+
|
|
248
|
+
- [ ] RESEARCH.md follows template
|
|
249
|
+
- [ ] DECISIONS.md updated with new decisions
|
|
250
|
+
- [ ] No LOW confidence items presented as recommendations
|
|
251
|
+
|
|
252
|
+
</quality_gates>
|
|
@@ -1,55 +0,0 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
# Requirements: {Feature Name}
|
|
2
|
-
|
|
3
|
-
## v1 Requirements
|
|
4
|
-
|
|
5
|
-
{Must-have requirements for the initial release. Each requirement should be testable and specific.}
|
|
6
|
-
|
|
7
|
-
### UI Requirements
|
|
8
|
-
- [ ] **{FEAT}-UI-01**: {Testable requirement description}
|
|
9
|
-
- [ ] **{FEAT}-UI-02**: {Testable requirement description}
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
### API Requirements
|
|
12
|
-
- [ ] **{FEAT}-API-01**: {Testable requirement description}
|
|
13
|
-
|
|
14
|
-
### Data Requirements
|
|
15
|
-
- [ ] **{FEAT}-DATA-01**: {Testable requirement description}
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
17
|
-
### Integration Requirements
|
|
18
|
-
- [ ] **{FEAT}-INT-01**: {Testable requirement description}
|
|
19
|
-
|
|
20
|
-
## v2 Requirements
|
|
21
|
-
|
|
22
|
-
{Deferred requirements for future iterations. Include rationale for deferral.}
|
|
23
|
-
|
|
24
|
-
- **{FEAT}-UI-03**: {Requirement description}
|
|
25
|
-
- *Deferred because:* {Rationale}
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
|
-
- **{FEAT}-API-02**: {Requirement description}
|
|
28
|
-
- *Deferred because:* {Rationale}
|
|
29
|
-
|
|
30
|
-
## Out of Scope
|
|
31
|
-
|
|
32
|
-
{Explicitly excluded from this feature. Prevents scope creep.}
|
|
33
|
-
|
|
34
|
-
| Feature | Reason |
|
|
35
|
-
|---------|--------|
|
|
36
|
-
| {What's excluded} | {Why it's out of scope} |
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
38
|
-
## Requirement Categories
|
|
39
|
-
|
|
40
|
-
| Category | Code | Description |
|
|
41
|
-
|----------|------|-------------|
|
|
42
|
-
| UI | UI | User interface and interactions |
|
|
43
|
-
| API | API | Backend endpoints and logic |
|
|
44
|
-
| Data | DATA | Data models, storage, migrations |
|
|
45
|
-
| Integration | INT | External services, third-party APIs |
|
|
46
|
-
| Security | SEC | Authentication, authorization, data protection |
|
|
47
|
-
| Performance | PERF | Speed, efficiency, scalability |
|
|
48
|
-
|
|
49
|
-
## Traceability
|
|
50
|
-
|
|
51
|
-
| Requirement | Phase | Status | Notes |
|
|
52
|
-
|-------------|-------|--------|-------|
|
|
53
|
-
| {FEAT}-UI-01 | 1 | pending | |
|
|
54
|
-
| {FEAT}-UI-02 | 1 | pending | |
|
|
55
|
-
| {FEAT}-API-01 | 2 | pending | |
|