speccrew 0.7.73 → 0.7.75
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.speccrew/agents/speccrew-feature-designer.md +96 -0
- package/.speccrew/agents/speccrew-product-manager.md +55 -0
- package/.speccrew/agents/speccrew-system-deployer.md +178 -0
- package/.speccrew/agents/speccrew-system-developer.md +177 -0
- package/.speccrew/agents/speccrew-task-worker.md +18 -0
- package/.speccrew/agents/speccrew-team-leader.md +56 -0
- package/.speccrew/agents/speccrew-test-manager.md +167 -0
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-agentflow-manager/SKILL.md +6 -149
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-deploy-build/SKILL.md +2 -59
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-deploy-migrate/SKILL.md +2 -64
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-deploy-smoke-test/SKILL.md +2 -75
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-deploy-startup/SKILL.md +2 -70
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-dev-backend/SKILL.md +2 -381
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-dev-desktop-electron/SKILL.md +2 -369
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-dev-desktop-tauri/SKILL.md +2 -362
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-dev-frontend/SKILL.md +2 -304
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-dev-mobile/SKILL.md +2 -294
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-dev-review-backend/SKILL.md +2 -204
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-dev-review-desktop/SKILL.md +2 -173
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-dev-review-frontend/SKILL.md +2 -169
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-dev-review-mobile/SKILL.md +2 -173
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-fd-api-contract/SKILL.md +2 -251
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-fd-feature-analyze/SKILL.md +2 -254
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-fd-feature-design/SKILL.md +2 -748
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-feature-designer-orchestration/SKILL.md +6 -105
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-get-timestamp/SKILL.md +6 -33
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-knowledge-bizs-api-analyze/SKILL.md +3 -138
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-knowledge-bizs-api-graph/SKILL.md +3 -283
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-knowledge-bizs-dispatch/SKILL.md +3 -1014
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-knowledge-bizs-identify-entries/SKILL.md +4 -343
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-knowledge-bizs-init-features/SKILL.md +4 -235
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-knowledge-bizs-module-classify/SKILL.md +6 -72
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-knowledge-bizs-ui-analyze/SKILL.md +3 -534
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-knowledge-bizs-ui-graph/SKILL.md +3 -432
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-knowledge-bizs-ui-style-extract/SKILL.md +4 -391
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-knowledge-graph-query/SKILL.md +3 -98
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-knowledge-graph-write/SKILL.md +3 -92
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-knowledge-module-summarize/SKILL.md +3 -181
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-knowledge-system-summarize/SKILL.md +3 -148
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-knowledge-techs-dispatch/SKILL.md +3 -330
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-knowledge-techs-generate/SKILL.md +6 -159
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-knowledge-techs-generate-conventions/SKILL.md +3 -142
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-knowledge-techs-generate-quality/SKILL.md +3 -568
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-knowledge-techs-generate-ui-style/SKILL.md +3 -180
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-knowledge-techs-index/SKILL.md +3 -154
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-knowledge-techs-init/SKILL.md +3 -176
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-knowledge-techs-ui-analyze/SKILL.md +3 -135
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-knowledge-detector/SKILL.md +4 -88
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-module-initializer/SKILL.md +4 -178
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-module-matcher/SKILL.md +3 -102
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-phase0-init/SKILL.md +5 -78
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-phase1-knowledge-check/SKILL.md +5 -85
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-phase2-complexity-assess/SKILL.md +4 -100
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-phase5-subprd-dispatch/SKILL.md +14 -106
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-phase6-verify-confirm/SKILL.md +7 -84
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-requirement-analysis/SKILL.md +6 -66
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-requirement-assess/SKILL.md +4 -96
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-requirement-clarify/SKILL.md +4 -131
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-requirement-model/SKILL.md +6 -79
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-requirement-simple/SKILL.md +4 -76
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-sub-prd-generate/SKILL.md +3 -281
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-product-manager-orchestration/SKILL.md +6 -165
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-system-deployer-orchestration/SKILL.md +6 -79
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-system-designer-orchestration/SKILL.md +2 -35
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-system-developer-orchestration/SKILL.md +6 -98
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-task-worker-execution/SKILL.md +6 -94
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-team-leader-routing/SKILL.md +6 -79
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-test-case-design/SKILL.md +2 -58
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-test-code-gen/SKILL.md +2 -61
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-test-manager-orchestration/SKILL.md +6 -94
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-test-reporter/SKILL.md +2 -102
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-test-runner/SKILL.md +3 -121
- package/package.json +1 -1
- package/workspace-template/docs/rules/agentflow-spec.md +56 -8
|
@@ -4,264 +4,12 @@ description: Feature Analysis SOP. Reads PRD documents and system knowledge to p
|
|
|
4
4
|
tools: Read, Write, Glob, Grep
|
|
5
5
|
---
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
7
|
-
# Methodology Foundation
|
|
8
|
-
|
|
9
|
-
This skill applies ISA-95 Stages 1-3 as an internal thinking framework for analysis:
|
|
10
|
-
|
|
11
|
-
| ISA-95 Stage | Analysis Purpose |
|
|
12
|
-
|--------------|------------------|
|
|
13
|
-
| Stage 1: Domain Description | Understand business context, scope boundaries, glossary |
|
|
14
|
-
| Stage 2: Information Flows | Identify data sources, destinations, and cross-module exchanges |
|
|
15
|
-
| Stage 3: Categories of Information | Classify data entities and establish information hierarchy |
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
17
|
-
> ⚠️ **No separate modeling documents.** The methodology guides thinking quality, not document quantity.
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
19
7
|
# Trigger Scenarios
|
|
20
|
-
|
|
21
8
|
- PRD has been confirmed, user requests to start feature analysis
|
|
22
9
|
- Feature Designer Agent needs to decompose PRD into functions before design
|
|
23
10
|
- User asks "Analyze this feature" or "Break down this requirement"
|
|
24
11
|
|
|
25
12
|
## AgentFlow Definition
|
|
26
|
-
|
|
27
13
|
<!-- @agentflow: SKILL.xml -->
|
|
28
|
-
|
|
29
|
-
>
|
|
30
|
-
|
|
31
|
-
## Workflow
|
|
32
|
-
|
|
33
|
-
**MANDATORY:**
|
|
34
|
-
- **Business Perspective Only** — Feature Analysis is a PURE BUSINESS document. It describes WHAT the system does from a business/user perspective, NOT HOW it's technically implemented.
|
|
35
|
-
- **Mermaid for all diagrams** — ALL business flows, interaction sequences, and cross-function flows MUST use Mermaid syntax (`flowchart TB`, `sequenceDiagram`). Plain text ASCII flowcharts are FORBIDDEN.
|
|
36
|
-
|
|
37
|
-
## Absolute Constraints
|
|
38
|
-
|
|
39
|
-
> **Violation = task failure**
|
|
40
|
-
|
|
41
|
-
1. **FORBIDDEN: Script execution failure** — If `update-progress.js` fails, HARD STOP and report error
|
|
42
|
-
2. **FORBIDDEN: Hand-written `.checkpoints.json`** — ALWAYS use `update-progress.js` script
|
|
43
|
-
3. **FORBIDDEN: Skip Checkpoint A** — User confirmation required before proceeding to design phase (unless `skip_checkpoint=true`)
|
|
44
|
-
4. **FORBIDDEN: Rename features** — Output filename MUST use the exact `feature_name` parameter value. DO NOT translate, abbreviate, paraphrase, or substitute with alternative names found in PRD content. The `feature_name` parameter is the SINGLE SOURCE OF TRUTH for file naming.
|
|
45
|
-
|
|
46
|
-
## Step 1: Read PRD Input
|
|
47
|
-
|
|
48
|
-
### 1.1 Input Parameters
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
| Parameter | Required | Description |
|
|
51
|
-
|-----------|----------|-------------|
|
|
52
|
-
| `prd_path` | Yes | Path to the Sub-PRD document |
|
|
53
|
-
| `feature_id` | No | Feature identifier (e.g., `F-CRM-01`) |
|
|
54
|
-
| `feature_name` | No | Feature name in English (e.g., `customer-list`) |
|
|
55
|
-
| `feature_type` | No | `Page+API` or `API-only` |
|
|
56
|
-
| `iteration_id` | No | Current iteration identifier |
|
|
57
|
-
| `frontend_platforms` | No | List of frontend platforms (auto-discover if not provided) |
|
|
58
|
-
| `skip_checkpoint` | No | Boolean, default `false`. Skip Checkpoint A if `true` |
|
|
59
|
-
|
|
60
|
-
### 1.2 Read PRD
|
|
61
|
-
|
|
62
|
-
Read the PRD document at `{prd_path}` (typically `speccrew-workspace/iterations/{number}-{type}-{name}/01.product-requirement/[module-name]-prd.md`)
|
|
63
|
-
|
|
64
|
-
### 1.3 Focus on Specific Feature (when feature_id provided)
|
|
65
|
-
|
|
66
|
-
If `feature_id` is provided:
|
|
67
|
-
- Locate the specific Feature in PRD Section 3.4 "Feature Breakdown"
|
|
68
|
-
- Extract only the user stories and requirements related to this Feature
|
|
69
|
-
- Ignore other Features in the same PRD
|
|
70
|
-
|
|
71
|
-
### 1.4 Backward Compatibility (when feature_id not provided)
|
|
72
|
-
|
|
73
|
-
If `feature_id` is NOT provided, process entire PRD using legacy mode.
|
|
74
|
-
|
|
75
|
-
## Step 2: Load System Knowledge
|
|
76
|
-
|
|
77
|
-
### 2.1 Read System Overview
|
|
78
|
-
|
|
79
|
-
Read: `speccrew-workspace/knowledges/bizs/system-overview.md`
|
|
80
|
-
|
|
81
|
-
### 2.2 Load Related Module Overviews
|
|
82
|
-
|
|
83
|
-
Based on PRD content, identify related modules and read:
|
|
84
|
-
```
|
|
85
|
-
speccrew-workspace/knowledges/bizs/{module-name}/{module-name}-overview.md
|
|
86
|
-
```
|
|
87
|
-
|
|
88
|
-
### 2.2b Discover Frontend Platforms
|
|
89
|
-
|
|
90
|
-
Read `speccrew-workspace/knowledges/techs/techs-manifest.json` to identify frontend platforms:
|
|
91
|
-
|
|
92
|
-
| Platform Type | Examples |
|
|
93
|
-
|---------------|----------|
|
|
94
|
-
| `web-*` | web-vue, web-react |
|
|
95
|
-
| `mobile-*` | mobile-uniapp, mobile-flutter |
|
|
96
|
-
|
|
97
|
-
- If `frontend_platforms` parameter provided, use that list
|
|
98
|
-
- Otherwise, read techs-manifest.json directly
|
|
99
|
-
|
|
100
|
-
### 2.3 Query Knowledge Graph (Optional)
|
|
101
|
-
|
|
102
|
-
If cross-module relationships need analysis, use `speccrew-knowledge-graph-query` skill.
|
|
103
|
-
|
|
104
|
-
## Step 3: Function Breakdown
|
|
105
|
-
|
|
106
|
-
Break down PRD functional requirements into implementable system functions.
|
|
107
|
-
|
|
108
|
-
### 3.1 Feature-Based Decomposition (when feature_id provided)
|
|
109
|
-
|
|
110
|
-
When processing a single Feature:
|
|
111
|
-
|
|
112
|
-
1. **Extract Feature Scope**: From PRD Section 3.4, locate the specific Feature by `feature_id`
|
|
113
|
-
2. **Identify Related User Stories**: Extract only user stories mapped to this Feature
|
|
114
|
-
3. **Decompose into Functions**: Break down into 3-8 focused Functions
|
|
115
|
-
4. **Check feature_type**: Mark `API-only` for backend-only design
|
|
116
|
-
|
|
117
|
-
### 3.2 Full PRD Decomposition (backward compatibility)
|
|
118
|
-
|
|
119
|
-
When `feature_id` is NOT provided (legacy mode):
|
|
120
|
-
- Decompose entire PRD into all required Functions
|
|
121
|
-
- May result in 10-20 Functions for complex modules
|
|
122
|
-
|
|
123
|
-
### 3.3 Function Analysis
|
|
124
|
-
|
|
125
|
-
For each function, identify:
|
|
126
|
-
|
|
127
|
-
| Aspect | Analysis Content |
|
|
128
|
-
|--------|------------------|
|
|
129
|
-
| **Frontend Changes** | New pages, components, or modifications to existing UI |
|
|
130
|
-
| **Backend Changes** | New interfaces or modifications to existing logic |
|
|
131
|
-
| **Data Changes** | New data structures or modifications to existing data |
|
|
132
|
-
| **System Relationship** | How this relates to existing system capabilities |
|
|
133
|
-
|
|
134
|
-
### Mark Relationship to Existing System
|
|
135
|
-
|
|
136
|
-
| Marker | Meaning | Example |
|
|
137
|
-
|--------|---------|---------|
|
|
138
|
-
| `[EXISTING]` | Reuse current system capability | `[EXISTING] User authentication system` |
|
|
139
|
-
| `[MODIFIED]` | Enhance/change existing feature | `[MODIFIED] Add validation to user profile form` |
|
|
140
|
-
| `[NEW]` | Create brand new functionality | `[NEW] Order management module` |
|
|
141
|
-
|
|
142
|
-
### Checkpoint A: Present Function Breakdown for Confirmation
|
|
143
|
-
|
|
144
|
-
**Conditional Execution:** If `skip_checkpoint=true`, skip user confirmation and proceed to Step 4.
|
|
145
|
-
|
|
146
|
-
If `skip_checkpoint=false` (default):
|
|
147
|
-
1. Present function breakdown with [EXISTING]/[MODIFIED]/[NEW] markers to user
|
|
148
|
-
2. Ask: "Does this function breakdown align with your understanding of the requirements?"
|
|
149
|
-
3. **HARD STOP** — Wait for user confirmation before proceeding
|
|
150
|
-
|
|
151
|
-
### Checkpoint A Progress Update
|
|
152
|
-
|
|
153
|
-
After user confirms (or if skipped):
|
|
154
|
-
|
|
155
|
-
```bash
|
|
156
|
-
node speccrew-workspace/scripts/update-progress.js write-checkpoint \
|
|
157
|
-
--file speccrew-workspace/iterations/{iteration_id}/02.feature-design/.checkpoints.json \
|
|
158
|
-
--stage 02_feature_design \
|
|
159
|
-
--checkpoint function_decomposition \
|
|
160
|
-
--passed true
|
|
161
|
-
```
|
|
162
|
-
|
|
163
|
-
Log: "✅ Checkpoint A (function_decomposition) passed and recorded"
|
|
164
|
-
|
|
165
|
-
## Step 4: Write Output Contract
|
|
166
|
-
|
|
167
|
-
Write analysis results to `.feature-analysis.md`:
|
|
168
|
-
|
|
169
|
-
### Output Path
|
|
170
|
-
|
|
171
|
-
| Mode | Output Path |
|
|
172
|
-
|------|-------------|
|
|
173
|
-
| With feature_id | `{prd_parent}/02.feature-design/{feature-id}-{feature-name}.feature-analysis.md` |
|
|
174
|
-
| Legacy mode | `{prd_parent}/02.feature-design/.feature-analysis.md` |
|
|
175
|
-
|
|
176
|
-
**CRITICAL — Filename Lock Rule:**
|
|
177
|
-
- `{feature-name}` in the output path MUST be the exact value of the `feature_name` parameter
|
|
178
|
-
- If PRD uses a different name for the same feature → use `feature_name` parameter for filename, note the discrepancy in the document header
|
|
179
|
-
- Example: parameter `feature_name = "店铺信息管理"` → filename MUST contain "店铺信息管理", NOT "shop-management" or "多店切换"
|
|
180
|
-
|
|
181
|
-
### Output Structure
|
|
182
|
-
|
|
183
|
-
```markdown
|
|
184
|
-
# Feature Analysis: {feature-name}
|
|
185
|
-
|
|
186
|
-
## Feature Information
|
|
187
|
-
- Feature ID: {feature_id}
|
|
188
|
-
- Feature Name: {feature_name}
|
|
189
|
-
- Feature Type: {feature_type}
|
|
190
|
-
- Source PRD: {prd_path}
|
|
191
|
-
|
|
192
|
-
## System Context Summary
|
|
193
|
-
[System knowledge and module overviews summary]
|
|
194
|
-
|
|
195
|
-
## Frontend Platforms
|
|
196
|
-
[List from techs-manifest.json]
|
|
197
|
-
|
|
198
|
-
## Function Breakdown (Total: {N} functions)
|
|
199
|
-
|
|
200
|
-
| # | Function Name | Type | Related User Stories | System Relationship |
|
|
201
|
-
|---|--------------|------|---------------------|---------------------|
|
|
202
|
-
| 1 | {name} | {frontend/backend/both} | {story refs} | [EXISTING]/[MODIFIED]/[NEW] |
|
|
203
|
-
|
|
204
|
-
## Function Details
|
|
205
|
-
### F1: {function-name}
|
|
206
|
-
- **Frontend Changes**: {description or N/A}
|
|
207
|
-
- **Backend Changes**: {description}
|
|
208
|
-
- **Data Changes**: {description}
|
|
209
|
-
- **System Relationship**: [EXISTING]/[MODIFIED]/[NEW] — {explanation}
|
|
210
|
-
|
|
211
|
-
> **Content Guidelines for Function Details:**
|
|
212
|
-
>
|
|
213
|
-
> | Aspect | ✅ ALLOWED (Business) | ❌ FORBIDDEN (Technical) |
|
|
214
|
-
> |--------|----------------------|--------------------------|
|
|
215
|
-
> | Frontend Changes | "New appointment list page with search/filter" | "AppointmentIndex.vue, ElDatePicker, v-hasPermi" |
|
|
216
|
-
> | Backend Changes | "Create appointment management operations with validation" | "@PreAuthorize, AppointmentService.java, MapStruct" |
|
|
217
|
-
> | Data Changes | "New appointment entity with status lifecycle" | "appointment_info table, customer_id BIGINT, SQL DDL" |
|
|
218
|
-
> | System Relationship | "[NEW] Full new business module" | "yudao-module-appointment Maven submodule" |
|
|
219
|
-
> | Diagrams | Mermaid flowchart/sequenceDiagram | ASCII text flowcharts |
|
|
220
|
-
|
|
221
|
-
## Name Discrepancy Notice (if applicable)
|
|
222
|
-
- Parameter feature_name: {feature_name}
|
|
223
|
-
- PRD actual feature name: {prd_name}
|
|
224
|
-
- Discrepancy: {description}
|
|
225
|
-
- File naming follows: parameter value (as per Filename Lock Rule)
|
|
226
|
-
|
|
227
|
-
## Decomposition Status
|
|
228
|
-
- Checkpoint A: {passed/pending}
|
|
229
|
-
- Confirmed at: {timestamp or null}
|
|
230
|
-
```
|
|
231
|
-
|
|
232
|
-
---
|
|
233
|
-
|
|
234
|
-
# Key Rules
|
|
235
|
-
|
|
236
|
-
| Rule | Description |
|
|
237
|
-
|------|-------------|
|
|
238
|
-
| **Business Perspective Only** | Feature Analysis describes business capabilities and functional requirements. Every section must describe WHAT from user/business perspective |
|
|
239
|
-
| **FORBIDDEN: File Paths** | Do NOT include any file paths, code paths, or directory structures (e.g., views/appointment/AppointmentIndex.vue, yudao-module-appointment/...) |
|
|
240
|
-
| **FORBIDDEN: Framework Code** | Do NOT include code snippets in any language — no Java classes, SQL DDL/DML, Vue templates, TypeScript API code, HTML markup, annotations (@PreAuthorize, @OperateLog, @TableLogic, @TableName) |
|
|
241
|
-
| **FORBIDDEN: Framework/Library Names** | Do NOT reference specific framework/library names as implementation details (MyBatis-Plus, MapStruct, Element Plus, wot-design-uni, ElDatePicker, wd-cell, BaseMapperX, etc.) |
|
|
242
|
-
| **FORBIDDEN: Database Artifacts** | Do NOT include database table names (appointment_info), column names (customer_id, staff_id), SQL types (BIGINT, VARCHAR), indexes, or any SQL statements |
|
|
243
|
-
| **FORBIDDEN: Technical Types** | Do NOT use programming language types (Long, String, Integer). Use business types: Text, Number, Date, Boolean, Enum, Identifier |
|
|
244
|
-
| **FORBIDDEN: ASCII Diagrams** | Do NOT use plain text or ASCII art flowcharts. ALL diagrams MUST use Mermaid syntax |
|
|
245
|
-
| **Mermaid Required** | Use `flowchart TB` for business process flows, `sequenceDiagram` for interaction flows. Reference mermaid-rule.md for syntax compliance |
|
|
246
|
-
| Analysis Only | Do NOT design UI wireframes, API specs, or data models — that belongs to Feature Design phase |
|
|
247
|
-
| System Markers | Always use [EXISTING]/[MODIFIED]/[NEW] to indicate system relationship |
|
|
248
|
-
| **Checkpoint A Required** | User confirmation required before design phase (unless skipped) |
|
|
249
|
-
| **Use Script for JSON** | Always use `update-progress.js` for checkpoint files |
|
|
250
|
-
| **Output Contract** | `.feature-analysis.md` serves as interface for downstream design skills |
|
|
251
|
-
|
|
252
|
-
# Checklist
|
|
253
|
-
|
|
254
|
-
- [ ] PRD has been read, all P0 requirements covered
|
|
255
|
-
- [ ] **[Single Feature Mode]** Feature ID and name parameters received
|
|
256
|
-
- [ ] **[Single Feature Mode]** Only related Feature content extracted from PRD
|
|
257
|
-
- [ ] **[Legacy Mode]** All sub PRDs have been read (if master-sub structure)
|
|
258
|
-
- [ ] System overview loaded for context
|
|
259
|
-
- [ ] Related module overviews loaded
|
|
260
|
-
- [ ] **[Cross-module]** Knowledge graph queried for relationship analysis
|
|
261
|
-
- [ ] Function breakdown completed with [EXISTING]/[MODIFIED]/[NEW] markers
|
|
262
|
-
- [ ] **[Single Feature Mode]** 3-8 focused Functions defined
|
|
263
|
-
- [ ] Checkpoint A passed: function breakdown confirmed with user (or skipped)
|
|
264
|
-
- [ ] `.checkpoints.json` updated via script
|
|
265
|
-
- [ ] `.feature-analysis.md` written to correct path
|
|
266
|
-
- [ ] **CRITICAL — Business Content Only**: All sections use business-level descriptions. ZERO file paths, framework names, code snippets, SQL, database table/column names, component library names, or technical types
|
|
267
|
-
- [ ] **CRITICAL — Mermaid Diagrams**: All process flows use Mermaid syntax (flowchart TB or sequenceDiagram). No ASCII text flowcharts
|
|
14
|
+
> **REQUIRED**: Before executing this workflow, read the XML workflow specification: speccrew-workspace/docs/rules/agentflow-spec.md
|
|
15
|
+
> Then read and execute the XML workflow in SKILL.xml block-by-block as the authoritative execution plan.
|