speccrew 0.7.19 → 0.7.21
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-phase5-subprd-dispatch/SKILL.md +71 -71
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-phase6-verify-confirm/SKILL.md +2 -2
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-requirement-clarify/templates/CLARIFICATION-QUESTIONS-TEMPLATE.md +23 -23
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-requirement-clarify/templates/CLARIFICATION-SUMMARY-TEMPLATE.md +21 -21
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-requirement-model/SKILL.md +10 -0
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-requirement-model/templates/MODULE-DESIGN-TEMPLATE.md +175 -0
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-requirement-model/workflow.agentflow.xml +13 -0
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-product-manager-orchestration/SKILL.md +38 -38
- package/package.json +1 -1
|
@@ -2,93 +2,93 @@
|
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
3
|
## Description
|
|
4
4
|
|
|
5
|
-
PM Phase 5 Sub-PRD
|
|
5
|
+
PM Phase 5 Sub-PRD Batch Dispatch Skill. Responsible for dispatching Sub-PRD generation tasks (split from complex requirements) to Worker Agents in batches.
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
7
|
-
|
|
8
|
-
-
|
|
9
|
-
-
|
|
10
|
-
-
|
|
11
|
-
-
|
|
12
|
-
-
|
|
7
|
+
This Skill is the core orchestration component of the Master-Sub PRD workflow, implementing:
|
|
8
|
+
- Reading Dispatch Plan from Master PRD (Sub-PRD grouping information)
|
|
9
|
+
- Initializing dispatch progress tracking file DISPATCH-PROGRESS.json
|
|
10
|
+
- Batch parallel dispatch of Workers to generate Sub-PRDs for each module
|
|
11
|
+
- Failure retry mechanism (max 1 retry)
|
|
12
|
+
- Result collection and completeness verification
|
|
13
13
|
|
|
14
14
|
## Input Parameters
|
|
15
15
|
|
|
16
16
|
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|
|
17
17
|
|-----------|------|----------|-------------|
|
|
18
|
-
| `prd_output` | object | true | Phase 4 PRD
|
|
19
|
-
| `iteration_path` | string | true |
|
|
20
|
-
| `language` | string | false |
|
|
21
|
-
| `workspace_path` | string | true | speccrew-workspace
|
|
22
|
-
| `update_progress_script` | string | true | update-progress.js
|
|
23
|
-
| `max_concurrent_workers` | number | false |
|
|
18
|
+
| `prd_output` | object | true | Phase 4 PRD generation output, containing master_prd_path, dispatch_plan_path, etc. |
|
|
19
|
+
| `iteration_path` | string | true | Absolute path to current iteration directory |
|
|
20
|
+
| `language` | string | false | User language (default: zh) |
|
|
21
|
+
| `workspace_path` | string | true | Absolute path to speccrew-workspace root directory |
|
|
22
|
+
| `update_progress_script` | string | true | Absolute path to update-progress.js script |
|
|
23
|
+
| `max_concurrent_workers` | number | false | Maximum concurrent Workers (default: 5) |
|
|
24
24
|
|
|
25
25
|
## Outputs
|
|
26
26
|
|
|
27
27
|
| Output | Type | Description |
|
|
28
28
|
|--------|------|-------------|
|
|
29
|
-
| `dispatch_result` | string |
|
|
30
|
-
| `total_subprds` | number | Sub-PRD
|
|
31
|
-
| `success_count` | number |
|
|
32
|
-
| `failure_count` | number |
|
|
33
|
-
| `sub_prd_files` | array |
|
|
34
|
-
| `feature_list_path` | string | Feature List
|
|
29
|
+
| `dispatch_result` | string | Dispatch result status: success / partial / failed |
|
|
30
|
+
| `total_subprds` | number | Total Sub-PRD count |
|
|
31
|
+
| `success_count` | number | Successfully generated Sub-PRD count |
|
|
32
|
+
| `failure_count` | number | Failed Sub-PRD count |
|
|
33
|
+
| `sub_prd_files` | array | List of generated Sub-PRD file paths |
|
|
34
|
+
| `feature_list_path` | string | Feature List file path |
|
|
35
35
|
|
|
36
36
|
<!-- @agentflow: workflow.agentflow.xml -->
|
|
37
37
|
|
|
38
38
|
## Checklist
|
|
39
39
|
|
|
40
|
-
### Step 5.1:
|
|
41
|
-
- [ ]
|
|
42
|
-
- [ ]
|
|
43
|
-
- [ ]
|
|
44
|
-
|
|
45
|
-
### Step 5.2:
|
|
46
|
-
- [ ]
|
|
47
|
-
- [ ]
|
|
48
|
-
- [ ]
|
|
49
|
-
|
|
50
|
-
### Step 5.3:
|
|
51
|
-
- [ ]
|
|
52
|
-
- [ ]
|
|
53
|
-
- [ ]
|
|
54
|
-
- [ ]
|
|
55
|
-
|
|
56
|
-
### Step 5.4:
|
|
57
|
-
- [ ]
|
|
58
|
-
- [ ]
|
|
59
|
-
- [ ]
|
|
60
|
-
|
|
61
|
-
### Step 5.5:
|
|
62
|
-
- [ ]
|
|
63
|
-
- [ ]
|
|
64
|
-
- [ ]
|
|
65
|
-
- [ ]
|
|
66
|
-
- [ ]
|
|
67
|
-
|
|
68
|
-
### Step 5.6:
|
|
69
|
-
- [ ]
|
|
40
|
+
### Step 5.1: Read Dispatch Plan
|
|
41
|
+
- [ ] Read dispatch-plan from Master PRD (Sub-PRD grouping information)
|
|
42
|
+
- [ ] Parse sub_prd_groups array
|
|
43
|
+
- [ ] Verify each group contains required fields: module_id, module_name, module_key, module_scope, module_entities
|
|
44
|
+
|
|
45
|
+
### Step 5.2: Initialize Progress Tracking
|
|
46
|
+
- [ ] Create temporary task definition file .tasks-temp.json
|
|
47
|
+
- [ ] Initialize DISPATCH-PROGRESS.json using update-progress.js script
|
|
48
|
+
- [ ] Verify initialization success (Total: N | Pending: N | Completed: 0)
|
|
49
|
+
|
|
50
|
+
### Step 5.3: Batch Dispatch Workers
|
|
51
|
+
- [ ] Group in batches of 5 for parallel dispatch
|
|
52
|
+
- [ ] Each Worker carries complete context parameters
|
|
53
|
+
- [ ] Update DISPATCH-PROGRESS.json after each batch completes
|
|
54
|
+
- [ ] Continue to next batch until all modules are processed
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
### Step 5.4: Failure Retry
|
|
57
|
+
- [ ] Check for tasks with failed status
|
|
58
|
+
- [ ] If failures exist -> retry once (single retry mechanism)
|
|
59
|
+
- [ ] If still failing after retry -> log and continue
|
|
60
|
+
|
|
61
|
+
### Step 5.5: Result Collection and Verification
|
|
62
|
+
- [ ] Read final DISPATCH-PROGRESS.json
|
|
63
|
+
- [ ] Verify all Sub-PRD files exist and size > 3KB
|
|
64
|
+
- [ ] Generate summary report
|
|
65
|
+
- [ ] Update checkpoint
|
|
66
|
+
- [ ] Verify feature list completeness
|
|
67
|
+
|
|
68
|
+
### Step 5.6: User Confirmation
|
|
69
|
+
- [ ] Wait for user confirmation of Sub-PRD generation results
|
|
70
70
|
|
|
71
71
|
## Key Rules
|
|
72
72
|
|
|
73
|
-
### MANDATORY - Worker
|
|
74
|
-
- **ONE Worker per Module** -
|
|
75
|
-
-
|
|
76
|
-
-
|
|
77
|
-
-
|
|
78
|
-
|
|
79
|
-
### MANDATORY -
|
|
80
|
-
- **Batch Size = 5** -
|
|
81
|
-
-
|
|
82
|
-
-
|
|
83
|
-
-
|
|
84
|
-
|
|
85
|
-
### MANDATORY -
|
|
86
|
-
-
|
|
87
|
-
-
|
|
88
|
-
-
|
|
89
|
-
|
|
90
|
-
### FORBIDDEN -
|
|
91
|
-
-
|
|
92
|
-
-
|
|
93
|
-
-
|
|
94
|
-
-
|
|
73
|
+
### MANDATORY - Worker Dispatch Rules
|
|
74
|
+
- **ONE Worker per Module** - Dispatch one independent Worker per Sub-PRD module
|
|
75
|
+
- **PM Must Not Generate Directly** - PM Agent must NOT directly generate Sub-PRD content
|
|
76
|
+
- **Must Use dispatch-to-worker** - All Workers must be executed via `dispatch-to-worker` action
|
|
77
|
+
- **Direct Skill Invocation Forbidden** - Must NOT directly invoke `speccrew-pm-sub-prd-generate` skill
|
|
78
|
+
|
|
79
|
+
### MANDATORY - Batch Processing Rules
|
|
80
|
+
- **Batch Size = 5** - Maximum 5 parallel Workers per batch
|
|
81
|
+
- **Parallel Dispatch** - Workers in the same batch must be dispatched simultaneously
|
|
82
|
+
- **Sequential Wait** - Wait for current batch to complete before dispatching next batch
|
|
83
|
+
- **Progress Update** - Immediately update DISPATCH-PROGRESS.json after each Worker completes
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
### MANDATORY - Progress Tracking Rules
|
|
86
|
+
- **Script Initialization** - DISPATCH-PROGRESS.json must be created via update-progress.js
|
|
87
|
+
- **Manual Creation Forbidden** - Must NOT create progress files directly via create_file or PowerShell
|
|
88
|
+
- **Idempotent Update** - Use `update-task` command to update individual task status
|
|
89
|
+
|
|
90
|
+
### FORBIDDEN - Prohibited Actions
|
|
91
|
+
- PM Agent directly generating Sub-PRD files is forbidden
|
|
92
|
+
- Dispatching one Worker to handle multiple modules is forbidden
|
|
93
|
+
- Skipping Worker dispatch as a fallback after failure is forbidden
|
|
94
|
+
- Marking checkpoint as passed before user confirmation is forbidden
|
|
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Applies three-stage gated verification:
|
|
|
35
35
|
|
|
36
36
|
## PM Stage Content Boundary
|
|
37
37
|
|
|
38
|
-
> **DO NOT:** Update checkpoints before user confirmation, skip user review gate, auto-proceed without explicit "
|
|
38
|
+
> **DO NOT:** Update checkpoints before user confirmation, skip user review gate, auto-proceed without explicit "confirm" or "OK", modify PRD document status before confirmation.
|
|
39
39
|
|
|
40
40
|
## Templates Used
|
|
41
41
|
|
|
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ Applies three-stage gated verification:
|
|
|
75
75
|
|
|
76
76
|
**Must do:**
|
|
77
77
|
- Execute all verification steps in order: 6.1 → 6.2 → 6.3
|
|
78
|
-
- Wait for explicit user confirmation ("
|
|
78
|
+
- Wait for explicit user confirmation ("confirm" or "OK") before Phase 6.3
|
|
79
79
|
- Use `update-progress.js` for all JSON file updates
|
|
80
80
|
- Present complete verification summary to user
|
|
81
81
|
- Report all deliverables with file paths and sizes
|
|
@@ -1,49 +1,49 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
#
|
|
1
|
+
# Requirement Clarification Questionnaire - Round {round_number}
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
3
|
> **Iteration**: {iteration_name}
|
|
4
4
|
> **Date**: {date}
|
|
5
5
|
> **Complexity**: {complexity_level}
|
|
6
6
|
|
|
7
|
-
##
|
|
7
|
+
## Clarification Context
|
|
8
8
|
|
|
9
|
-
|
|
9
|
+
Based on the user requirement: "{requirement_summary}", the following items need further clarification.
|
|
10
10
|
|
|
11
|
-
##
|
|
11
|
+
## Items to Confirm
|
|
12
12
|
|
|
13
|
-
### 🎯
|
|
13
|
+
### 🎯 Business Scope & Boundaries
|
|
14
14
|
|
|
15
|
-
| # |
|
|
15
|
+
| # | Question | Priority | User Answer |
|
|
16
16
|
|---|------|--------|---------|
|
|
17
|
-
| 1 | {question} | {priority} |
|
|
17
|
+
| 1 | {question} | {priority} | _To be answered_ |
|
|
18
18
|
|
|
19
|
-
### 👥
|
|
19
|
+
### 👥 User Roles & Permissions
|
|
20
20
|
|
|
21
|
-
| # |
|
|
21
|
+
| # | Question | Priority | User Answer |
|
|
22
22
|
|---|------|--------|---------|
|
|
23
|
-
| 1 | {question} | {priority} |
|
|
23
|
+
| 1 | {question} | {priority} | _To be answered_ |
|
|
24
24
|
|
|
25
|
-
### 🔄
|
|
25
|
+
### 🔄 Business Rules & Processes
|
|
26
26
|
|
|
27
|
-
| # |
|
|
27
|
+
| # | Question | Priority | User Answer |
|
|
28
28
|
|---|------|--------|---------|
|
|
29
|
-
| 1 | {question} | {priority} |
|
|
29
|
+
| 1 | {question} | {priority} | _To be answered_ |
|
|
30
30
|
|
|
31
|
-
### 🔗
|
|
31
|
+
### 🔗 Integration & Dependencies
|
|
32
32
|
|
|
33
|
-
| # |
|
|
33
|
+
| # | Question | Priority | User Answer |
|
|
34
34
|
|---|------|--------|---------|
|
|
35
|
-
| 1 | {question} | {priority} |
|
|
35
|
+
| 1 | {question} | {priority} | _To be answered_ |
|
|
36
36
|
|
|
37
|
-
### ⚡
|
|
37
|
+
### ⚡ Performance & Constraints
|
|
38
38
|
|
|
39
|
-
| # |
|
|
39
|
+
| # | Question | Priority | User Answer |
|
|
40
40
|
|---|------|--------|---------|
|
|
41
|
-
| 1 | {question} | {priority} |
|
|
41
|
+
| 1 | {question} | {priority} | _To be answered_ |
|
|
42
42
|
|
|
43
43
|
---
|
|
44
44
|
|
|
45
|
-
##
|
|
45
|
+
## Instructions
|
|
46
46
|
|
|
47
|
-
1.
|
|
48
|
-
2.
|
|
49
|
-
3.
|
|
47
|
+
1. Please fill in your answers directly in the "User Answer" column
|
|
48
|
+
2. If a question is not applicable, enter "N/A" with a brief explanation
|
|
49
|
+
3. If additional information is needed, you may append notes after your answer
|
package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-requirement-clarify/templates/CLARIFICATION-SUMMARY-TEMPLATE.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,52 +1,52 @@
|
|
|
1
|
-
#
|
|
1
|
+
# Requirement Clarification Summary
|
|
2
2
|
|
|
3
3
|
> **Iteration**: {iteration_name}
|
|
4
4
|
> **Total Rounds**: {total_rounds}
|
|
5
5
|
> **Date**: {date}
|
|
6
6
|
> **Final Sufficiency**: {sufficiency_result} ({checks_passed}/4)
|
|
7
7
|
|
|
8
|
-
## 1.
|
|
8
|
+
## 1. Requirement Overview
|
|
9
9
|
|
|
10
10
|
{requirement_overview}
|
|
11
11
|
|
|
12
|
-
## 2.
|
|
12
|
+
## 2. Complexity Assessment
|
|
13
13
|
|
|
14
|
-
|
|
|
14
|
+
| Dimension | Assessment | Rationale |
|
|
15
15
|
|------|------|------|
|
|
16
|
-
|
|
|
17
|
-
|
|
|
18
|
-
|
|
|
19
|
-
|
|
|
16
|
+
| Business Complexity | {business_complexity} | {reason} |
|
|
17
|
+
| Technical Complexity | {technical_complexity} | {reason} |
|
|
18
|
+
| Integration Complexity | {integration_complexity} | {reason} |
|
|
19
|
+
| **Overall Assessment** | **{overall_complexity}** | |
|
|
20
20
|
|
|
21
|
-
## 3.
|
|
21
|
+
## 3. Key Decision Log
|
|
22
22
|
|
|
23
|
-
| # |
|
|
23
|
+
| # | Decision Item | Decision Result | Confirmed Round |
|
|
24
24
|
|---|--------|---------|---------|
|
|
25
25
|
| 1 | {decision_item} | {decision_result} | Round {N} |
|
|
26
26
|
|
|
27
|
-
## 4.
|
|
27
|
+
## 4. Clarification Q&A Summary
|
|
28
28
|
|
|
29
29
|
### Round {N}
|
|
30
30
|
|
|
31
|
-
| # |
|
|
31
|
+
| # | Question | Answer | Category |
|
|
32
32
|
|---|------|------|------|
|
|
33
33
|
| 1 | {question} | {answer} | {category} |
|
|
34
34
|
|
|
35
|
-
## 5.
|
|
35
|
+
## 5. Sufficiency Check Results
|
|
36
36
|
|
|
37
|
-
| # |
|
|
37
|
+
| # | Check Item | Status | Detail |
|
|
38
38
|
|---|--------|------|------|
|
|
39
|
-
| 1 |
|
|
40
|
-
| 2 |
|
|
41
|
-
| 3 |
|
|
42
|
-
| 4 |
|
|
39
|
+
| 1 | Scope boundaries are clear | {status} | {detail} |
|
|
40
|
+
| 2 | Key business rules documented | {status} | {detail} |
|
|
41
|
+
| 3 | Priority/phasing decisions made | {status} | {detail} |
|
|
42
|
+
| 4 | Integration boundaries identified | {status} | {detail} |
|
|
43
43
|
|
|
44
|
-
## 6.
|
|
44
|
+
## 6. Open Issues & Risks
|
|
45
45
|
|
|
46
|
-
| # |
|
|
46
|
+
| # | Issue/Risk | Impact | Suggested Resolution |
|
|
47
47
|
|---|----------|------|------------|
|
|
48
48
|
| 1 | {issue} | {impact} | {suggestion} |
|
|
49
49
|
|
|
50
|
-
## 7.
|
|
50
|
+
## 7. Next Steps
|
|
51
51
|
|
|
52
52
|
{next_steps}
|
|
@@ -76,3 +76,13 @@ Applies ISA-95 Stages 1-3 as structured analysis framework:
|
|
|
76
76
|
- Include technical implementation details
|
|
77
77
|
- Create circular module dependencies
|
|
78
78
|
- Manually write JSON files
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
### Diagram Format Rule (MANDATORY)
|
|
81
|
+
- All diagrams MUST use Mermaid syntax (graph TB, graph TD, graph LR, etc.)
|
|
82
|
+
- ASCII art diagrams are FORBIDDEN
|
|
83
|
+
- Reference `mermaid-rule.md` for compatibility
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
### Template
|
|
86
|
+
- Module design document MUST follow `templates/MODULE-DESIGN-TEMPLATE.md` structure
|
|
87
|
+
- All 10 sections are required
|
|
88
|
+
- Fill template with analyzed data from ISA-95 stages
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Module Design Document (.module-design.md)
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
> **Iteration**: iteration_name
|
|
4
|
+
> **Generated**: date
|
|
5
|
+
> **System**: system_name
|
|
6
|
+
> **Tech Stack**: tech_stack
|
|
7
|
+
> **Document Type**: ISA-95 Business Modeling & Module Decomposition
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
---
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## 1. Business Domain Analysis (ISA-95 Stage 1: Domain Description)
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
### 1.1 Domain Boundary Definition
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
<!-- Describe system positioning -->
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
#### System Scope (IN-SCOPE)
|
|
18
|
+
| Domain | Description |
|
|
19
|
+
|--------|-------------|
|
|
20
|
+
| domain | description |
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
#### Out of Scope (OUT-OF-SCOPE)
|
|
23
|
+
| Domain | Description | Planned Phase |
|
|
24
|
+
|--------|-------------|---------------|
|
|
25
|
+
| domain | description | phase |
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
### 1.2 Actor Definition
|
|
28
|
+
| Actor ID | Actor Name | Responsibilities | Data Scope | Typical Scenario |
|
|
29
|
+
|----------|------------|------------------|------------|------------------|
|
|
30
|
+
| role_id | role_name | responsibility | data_scope | scenario |
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
### 1.3 Core Business Glossary
|
|
33
|
+
| Term | Definition | Business Rule | Related Module |
|
|
34
|
+
|------|------------|---------------|----------------|
|
|
35
|
+
| term | definition | rule | module |
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
### 1.4 Domain Model Diagram
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
```mermaid
|
|
40
|
+
graph TB
|
|
41
|
+
M01[M01 System Foundation] --> M02[M02 Module Name]
|
|
42
|
+
M01 --> M04[M04 Module Name]
|
|
43
|
+
M02 --> M03[M03 Module Name]
|
|
44
|
+
%% Draw based on actual module dependencies
|
|
45
|
+
```
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
---
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
## 2. Function Decomposition (ISA-95 Stage 2: Functions in Domain)
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
### 2.1 WBS Work Breakdown Structure
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
#### module_id - module_name (count function points)
|
|
54
|
+
| Function ID | Function Name | Description | Priority | Dependencies |
|
|
55
|
+
|-------------|---------------|-------------|----------|--------------|
|
|
56
|
+
| func_id | func_name | description | priority | dependency |
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
### 2.2 Function Priority Distribution
|
|
59
|
+
| Priority | Function Points | Percentage | Module Distribution |
|
|
60
|
+
|----------|-----------------|------------|--------------------|
|
|
61
|
+
| **P0 (Core)** | count | percent | modules |
|
|
62
|
+
| **P1 (Important)** | count | percent | modules |
|
|
63
|
+
| **P2 (Optional)** | count | percent | modules |
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
---
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
## 3. Module Priority & Phasing (ISA-95 Stage 3: Functions of Interest)
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
### 3.1 MoSCoW Priority Analysis
|
|
70
|
+
| Priority | Definition | Module | Description |
|
|
71
|
+
|----------|------------|--------|-------------|
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
### 3.2 Implementation Phases
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
#### Phase 1 (MVP - Minimum Viable Product)
|
|
76
|
+
**Core Chain**: core_chain
|
|
77
|
+
| Module | Function Points | Deliverables |
|
|
78
|
+
|--------|-----------------|--------------|
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
**MVP Acceptance Criteria**:
|
|
81
|
+
- ✅ criteria
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
#### Phase 2 (Full Version - Stage 1)
|
|
84
|
+
<!-- Same structure as above -->
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
#### Phase 3 (Stage 2 Planning)
|
|
87
|
+
<!-- Same structure as above -->
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
---
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
## 4. Module Dependencies
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
### 4.1 Dependency Matrix
|
|
94
|
+
| Module | Dependent Module | Dependency Type | Description |
|
|
95
|
+
|--------|------------------|-----------------|-------------|
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
### 4.2 Dependency Graph
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
```mermaid
|
|
100
|
+
graph TD
|
|
101
|
+
M01[M01 System Foundation] --> M02[M02 Module Name]
|
|
102
|
+
M01 --> M04[M04 Module Name]
|
|
103
|
+
M02 --> M03[M03 Module Name]
|
|
104
|
+
%% Draw directed acyclic graph based on dependency matrix
|
|
105
|
+
```
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
### 4.3 Circular Dependency Check
|
|
108
|
+
<!-- Must confirm no circular dependencies -->
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
---
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
## 5. Module Implementation Sequence
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
### 5.1 Implementation Phase Ordering
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
```mermaid
|
|
117
|
+
graph LR
|
|
118
|
+
P0[Phase 0: Infrastructure] --> P1[Phase 1: Core Entities]
|
|
119
|
+
P1 --> P2[Phase 2: Core Workflows]
|
|
120
|
+
P2 --> P3[Phase 3: Value-Added Features]
|
|
121
|
+
P3 --> P4[Phase 4: Data Analytics]
|
|
122
|
+
%% Adjust based on actual phases
|
|
123
|
+
```
|
|
124
|
+
|
|
125
|
+
### 5.2 Parallel Development Recommendations
|
|
126
|
+
| Phase | Parallel Modules | Description |
|
|
127
|
+
|-------|------------------|-------------|
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
---
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
## 6. Module Boundary Definition
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
### 6.1 Module Responsibility Boundaries
|
|
134
|
+
| Module | Core Responsibilities | Excluded Responsibilities | Boundary Notes |
|
|
135
|
+
|--------|----------------------|--------------------------|----------------|
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
137
|
+
### 6.2 Data Ownership
|
|
138
|
+
| Data Entity | Owner Module | Read-Only Modules | Description |
|
|
139
|
+
|-------------|--------------|-------------------|-------------|
|
|
140
|
+
|
|
141
|
+
---
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
## 7. Tech Stack Capability Reuse Analysis
|
|
144
|
+
|
|
145
|
+
### 7.1 Reusable Capabilities
|
|
146
|
+
| Required Function | Existing Capability | Reuse Level | Development Effort | Notes |
|
|
147
|
+
|-------------------|---------------------|-------------|--------------------|-------|
|
|
148
|
+
|
|
149
|
+
### 7.2 New Development Capabilities
|
|
150
|
+
| Capability | Module | Development Priority | Estimated Effort | Notes |
|
|
151
|
+
|------------|--------|---------------------|------------------|-------|
|
|
152
|
+
|
|
153
|
+
---
|
|
154
|
+
|
|
155
|
+
## 8. Risks & Mitigation Measures
|
|
156
|
+
|
|
157
|
+
### 8.1 Technical Risks
|
|
158
|
+
| Risk Item | Affected Modules | Impact Level | Probability | Mitigation Measures |
|
|
159
|
+
|-----------|------------------|--------------|-------------|---------------------|
|
|
160
|
+
|
|
161
|
+
### 8.2 Business Risks
|
|
162
|
+
| Risk Item | Affected Modules | Impact Level | Probability | Mitigation Measures |
|
|
163
|
+
|-----------|------------------|--------------|-------------|---------------------|
|
|
164
|
+
|
|
165
|
+
---
|
|
166
|
+
|
|
167
|
+
## 9. Module Summary
|
|
168
|
+
| Module ID | Module Name | Function Points | Priority | Implementation Phase | Dependencies | Core Responsibilities |
|
|
169
|
+
|-----------|-------------|-----------------|----------|---------------------|--------------|-----------------------|
|
|
170
|
+
|
|
171
|
+
---
|
|
172
|
+
|
|
173
|
+
## 10. Sign-off
|
|
174
|
+
| Role | Name | Date | Signature |
|
|
175
|
+
|------|------|------|-----------|
|
|
@@ -27,6 +27,12 @@
|
|
|
27
27
|
<field name="text">Manually write JSON files</field>
|
|
28
28
|
</block>
|
|
29
29
|
|
|
30
|
+
<block type="rule" id="R-MERMAID" level="mandatory" desc="All diagrams must use Mermaid syntax">
|
|
31
|
+
<field name="text">MANDATORY: All diagrams (domain model, dependency graph, implementation phases) MUST use Mermaid syntax.</field>
|
|
32
|
+
<field name="text">ASCII art diagrams are FORBIDDEN. Use graph TB, graph TD, graph LR as appropriate.</field>
|
|
33
|
+
<field name="text">Reference workspace-template/docs/rules/mermaid-rule.md for compatibility guidelines.</field>
|
|
34
|
+
</block>
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
30
36
|
<!-- ============================================================
|
|
31
37
|
Main Processing Sequence
|
|
32
38
|
============================================================ -->
|
|
@@ -161,8 +167,15 @@
|
|
|
161
167
|
</branch>
|
|
162
168
|
</block>
|
|
163
169
|
|
|
170
|
+
<!-- Read module design template -->
|
|
171
|
+
<block type="task" id="B10-TPL" action="read-file" desc="Read module design template">
|
|
172
|
+
<field name="path">${skill_path}/templates/MODULE-DESIGN-TEMPLATE.md</field>
|
|
173
|
+
<field name="output" var="template_content"/>
|
|
174
|
+
</block>
|
|
175
|
+
|
|
164
176
|
<!-- Step 4: Generate .module-design.md -->
|
|
165
177
|
<block type="task" id="B11" action="generate" desc="Generate module design document">
|
|
178
|
+
<field name="template" value="${template_content}"/>
|
|
166
179
|
<field name="output_path" value="${iteration_path}/01.product-requirement/.module-design.md"/>
|
|
167
180
|
<field name="sections">
|
|
168
181
|
- ISA-95 Analysis Summary (if complex)
|
|
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: speccrew-product-manager-orchestration
|
|
3
3
|
version: 2.0.0
|
|
4
|
-
description: Product Manager
|
|
4
|
+
description: Product Manager core orchestration skill (pure routing layer v2.0), responsible for workflow resume routing and dispatch-to-worker scheduling for each Phase Skill. All business logic is executed by independent Phase Skills.
|
|
5
5
|
tools: Read, Write, Glob, Grep, Bash, Agent
|
|
6
6
|
---
|
|
7
7
|
|
|
@@ -34,32 +34,32 @@ tools: Read, Write, Glob, Grep, Bash, Agent
|
|
|
34
34
|
|
|
35
35
|
# Product Manager Orchestration (v2.0)
|
|
36
36
|
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
37
|
+
Pure routing layer orchestration skill, responsible for:
|
|
38
38
|
|
|
39
|
-
1. **Workflow Initialization** - Phase 0
|
|
40
|
-
2. **Resume Routing** -
|
|
41
|
-
3. **Phase Dispatch** -
|
|
42
|
-
4. **User Confirmation Gates** - Phase 3
|
|
39
|
+
1. **Workflow Initialization** - Phase 0 initialization and returning resume target
|
|
40
|
+
2. **Resume Routing** - Jump to the correct Phase based on `resume_target`
|
|
41
|
+
3. **Phase Dispatch** - Each Phase has only one `dispatch-to-worker` call
|
|
42
|
+
4. **User Confirmation Gates** - Mandatory user confirmation gates for Phase 3 and Phase 4a
|
|
43
43
|
|
|
44
44
|
## Architecture: Pure Routing Layer
|
|
45
45
|
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
46
|
+
This Skill is a **pure routing layer**, all business logic is executed by independent Phase Skills:
|
|
47
47
|
|
|
48
48
|
| Phase | Block ID | Skill | Purpose |
|
|
49
49
|
|-------|----------|-------|---------|
|
|
50
|
-
| Phase 0 | P0 | `speccrew-pm-phase0-init` |
|
|
51
|
-
| Phase 1 | P1 | `speccrew-pm-phase1-knowledge-check` |
|
|
52
|
-
| Phase 2 | P2 | `speccrew-pm-phase2-complexity-assess` |
|
|
53
|
-
| Phase 3 | P3 | `speccrew-pm-requirement-clarify` |
|
|
54
|
-
| Phase 4 Simple | P4-SIMPLE | `speccrew-pm-requirement-simple` |
|
|
55
|
-
| Phase 4a | P4A | `speccrew-pm-requirement-model` |
|
|
56
|
-
| Phase 4b | P4B | `speccrew-pm-requirement-analysis` |
|
|
57
|
-
| Phase 5 | P5 | `speccrew-pm-phase5-subprd-dispatch` | Sub-PRD Worker
|
|
58
|
-
| Phase 6 | P6 | `speccrew-pm-phase6-verify-confirm` |
|
|
50
|
+
| Phase 0 | P0 | `speccrew-pm-phase0-init` | Workflow initialization, iteration directory creation/locating, resume state detection |
|
|
51
|
+
| Phase 1 | P1 | `speccrew-pm-phase1-knowledge-check` | Knowledge base status detection, module matching, knowledge initialization |
|
|
52
|
+
| Phase 2 | P2 | `speccrew-pm-phase2-complexity-assess` | Complexity assessment, simple/complex path decision |
|
|
53
|
+
| Phase 3 | P3 | `speccrew-pm-requirement-clarify` | Requirement clarification, Q&A collection |
|
|
54
|
+
| Phase 4 Simple | P4-SIMPLE | `speccrew-pm-requirement-simple` | Simple requirements: single PRD generation |
|
|
55
|
+
| Phase 4a | P4A | `speccrew-pm-requirement-model` | Complex requirements: ISA-95 modeling |
|
|
56
|
+
| Phase 4b | P4B | `speccrew-pm-requirement-analysis` | Complex requirements: Master PRD generation |
|
|
57
|
+
| Phase 5 | P5 | `speccrew-pm-phase5-subprd-dispatch` | Sub-PRD Worker dispatch |
|
|
58
|
+
| Phase 6 | P6 | `speccrew-pm-phase6-verify-confirm` | Verification checklist, user review, final confirmation |
|
|
59
59
|
|
|
60
60
|
## User Confirmation Gates (MANDATORY)
|
|
61
61
|
|
|
62
|
-
Phase 3
|
|
62
|
+
There are **mandatory user confirmation gates** after Phase 3 and Phase 4a:
|
|
63
63
|
|
|
64
64
|
### R-CONFIRM Rule Block
|
|
65
65
|
|
|
@@ -81,24 +81,24 @@ Phase 3 和 Phase 4a 之后有**强制性用户确认门禁**:
|
|
|
81
81
|
```
|
|
82
82
|
|
|
83
83
|
**Key Points:**
|
|
84
|
-
- `action="user-confirm"` —
|
|
85
|
-
- `skippable="false"` —
|
|
86
|
-
-
|
|
84
|
+
- `action="user-confirm"` — Must wait for explicit user confirmation
|
|
85
|
+
- `skippable="false"` — Cannot be skipped
|
|
86
|
+
- Checkpoint write **MUST** be executed after user confirmation
|
|
87
87
|
|
|
88
88
|
## Resume Router
|
|
89
89
|
|
|
90
|
-
Phase 0
|
|
90
|
+
Phase 0 outputs `resume_target` to control resume routing:
|
|
91
91
|
|
|
92
92
|
| resume_target | Target Block | Description |
|
|
93
93
|
|---------------|--------------|-------------|
|
|
94
|
-
| `PHASE_1_KNOWLEDGE_CHECK` | P1 |
|
|
95
|
-
| `PHASE_3_USER_CONFIRMATION` | P3-CONFIRM |
|
|
96
|
-
| `PHASE_4_PRD_SIMPLE` | P4-SIMPLE |
|
|
97
|
-
| `PHASE_4A_MODEL` | P4A |
|
|
98
|
-
| `PHASE_4A_CONFIRMATION` | P4A-CONFIRM |
|
|
99
|
-
| `PHASE_4B_PRD_GENERATION` | P4B | Master PRD
|
|
100
|
-
| `PHASE_5_SUBPRD_DISPATCH` | P5 | Sub-PRD
|
|
101
|
-
| `PHASE_6_VERIFICATION` | P6 |
|
|
94
|
+
| `PHASE_1_KNOWLEDGE_CHECK` | P1 | Start from knowledge base check |
|
|
95
|
+
| `PHASE_3_USER_CONFIRMATION` | P3-CONFIRM | Resume to Phase 3 confirmation gate |
|
|
96
|
+
| `PHASE_4_PRD_SIMPLE` | P4-SIMPLE | Simple path PRD generation |
|
|
97
|
+
| `PHASE_4A_MODEL` | P4A | Complex path modeling |
|
|
98
|
+
| `PHASE_4A_CONFIRMATION` | P4A-CONFIRM | Resume to Phase 4a confirmation gate |
|
|
99
|
+
| `PHASE_4B_PRD_GENERATION` | P4B | Master PRD generation |
|
|
100
|
+
| `PHASE_5_SUBPRD_DISPATCH` | P5 | Sub-PRD dispatch |
|
|
101
|
+
| `PHASE_6_VERIFICATION` | P6 | Verification and confirmation |
|
|
102
102
|
|
|
103
103
|
## Invocation Method
|
|
104
104
|
|
|
@@ -114,18 +114,18 @@ Phase 0 输出 `resume_target` 控制恢复跳转:
|
|
|
114
114
|
|
|
115
115
|
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|
|
116
116
|
|-----------|------|----------|-------------|
|
|
117
|
-
| `user_requirement` | string | Yes |
|
|
118
|
-
| `workspace_root` | string | Yes | speccrew-workspace
|
|
119
|
-
| `source_path` | string | No |
|
|
120
|
-
| `language` | string | No |
|
|
117
|
+
| `user_requirement` | string | Yes | User requirement description or requirement document path |
|
|
118
|
+
| `workspace_root` | string | Yes | speccrew-workspace root directory path |
|
|
119
|
+
| `source_path` | string | No | Project source code root directory (read from .speccrewrc) |
|
|
120
|
+
| `language` | string | No | User language (default auto-detect) |
|
|
121
121
|
|
|
122
122
|
## Output
|
|
123
123
|
|
|
124
|
-
- `status` -
|
|
125
|
-
- `prd_files` -
|
|
126
|
-
- `feature_list` -
|
|
127
|
-
- `workflow_stage` -
|
|
128
|
-
- `next_agent` -
|
|
124
|
+
- `status` - Execution status (success / partial / failed)
|
|
125
|
+
- `prd_files` - List of generated PRD files
|
|
126
|
+
- `feature_list` - Feature list file path
|
|
127
|
+
- `workflow_stage` - Current workflow stage status
|
|
128
|
+
- `next_agent` - Recommended next Agent
|
|
129
129
|
|
|
130
130
|
---
|
|
131
131
|
|