speccrew 0.7.19 → 0.7.20
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-requirement-model/SKILL.md +10 -0
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-requirement-model/templates/MODULE-DESIGN-TEMPLATE.md +175 -0
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-requirement-model/workflow.agentflow.xml +13 -0
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-product-manager-orchestration/SKILL.md +29 -29
- package/package.json +1 -1
|
@@ -76,3 +76,13 @@ Applies ISA-95 Stages 1-3 as structured analysis framework:
|
|
|
76
76
|
- Include technical implementation details
|
|
77
77
|
- Create circular module dependencies
|
|
78
78
|
- Manually write JSON files
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
### Diagram Format Rule (MANDATORY)
|
|
81
|
+
- All diagrams MUST use Mermaid syntax (graph TB, graph TD, graph LR, etc.)
|
|
82
|
+
- ASCII art diagrams are FORBIDDEN
|
|
83
|
+
- Reference `mermaid-rule.md` for compatibility
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
### Template
|
|
86
|
+
- Module design document MUST follow `templates/MODULE-DESIGN-TEMPLATE.md` structure
|
|
87
|
+
- All 10 sections are required
|
|
88
|
+
- Fill template with analyzed data from ISA-95 stages
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Module Design Document (.module-design.md)
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
> **Iteration**: iteration_name
|
|
4
|
+
> **Generated**: date
|
|
5
|
+
> **System**: system_name
|
|
6
|
+
> **Tech Stack**: tech_stack
|
|
7
|
+
> **Document Type**: ISA-95 Business Modeling & Module Decomposition
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
---
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## 1. Business Domain Analysis (ISA-95 Stage 1: Domain Description)
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
### 1.1 Domain Boundary Definition
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
<!-- Describe system positioning -->
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
#### System Scope (IN-SCOPE)
|
|
18
|
+
| Domain | Description |
|
|
19
|
+
|--------|-------------|
|
|
20
|
+
| domain | description |
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
#### Out of Scope (OUT-OF-SCOPE)
|
|
23
|
+
| Domain | Description | Planned Phase |
|
|
24
|
+
|--------|-------------|---------------|
|
|
25
|
+
| domain | description | phase |
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
### 1.2 Actor Definition
|
|
28
|
+
| Actor ID | Actor Name | Responsibilities | Data Scope | Typical Scenario |
|
|
29
|
+
|----------|------------|------------------|------------|------------------|
|
|
30
|
+
| role_id | role_name | responsibility | data_scope | scenario |
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
### 1.3 Core Business Glossary
|
|
33
|
+
| Term | Definition | Business Rule | Related Module |
|
|
34
|
+
|------|------------|---------------|----------------|
|
|
35
|
+
| term | definition | rule | module |
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
### 1.4 Domain Model Diagram
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
```mermaid
|
|
40
|
+
graph TB
|
|
41
|
+
M01[M01 System Foundation] --> M02[M02 Module Name]
|
|
42
|
+
M01 --> M04[M04 Module Name]
|
|
43
|
+
M02 --> M03[M03 Module Name]
|
|
44
|
+
%% Draw based on actual module dependencies
|
|
45
|
+
```
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
---
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
## 2. Function Decomposition (ISA-95 Stage 2: Functions in Domain)
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
### 2.1 WBS Work Breakdown Structure
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
#### module_id - module_name (count function points)
|
|
54
|
+
| Function ID | Function Name | Description | Priority | Dependencies |
|
|
55
|
+
|-------------|---------------|-------------|----------|--------------|
|
|
56
|
+
| func_id | func_name | description | priority | dependency |
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
### 2.2 Function Priority Distribution
|
|
59
|
+
| Priority | Function Points | Percentage | Module Distribution |
|
|
60
|
+
|----------|-----------------|------------|--------------------|
|
|
61
|
+
| **P0 (Core)** | count | percent | modules |
|
|
62
|
+
| **P1 (Important)** | count | percent | modules |
|
|
63
|
+
| **P2 (Optional)** | count | percent | modules |
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
---
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
## 3. Module Priority & Phasing (ISA-95 Stage 3: Functions of Interest)
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
### 3.1 MoSCoW Priority Analysis
|
|
70
|
+
| Priority | Definition | Module | Description |
|
|
71
|
+
|----------|------------|--------|-------------|
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
### 3.2 Implementation Phases
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
#### Phase 1 (MVP - Minimum Viable Product)
|
|
76
|
+
**Core Chain**: core_chain
|
|
77
|
+
| Module | Function Points | Deliverables |
|
|
78
|
+
|--------|-----------------|--------------|
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
**MVP Acceptance Criteria**:
|
|
81
|
+
- ✅ criteria
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
#### Phase 2 (Full Version - Stage 1)
|
|
84
|
+
<!-- Same structure as above -->
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
#### Phase 3 (Stage 2 Planning)
|
|
87
|
+
<!-- Same structure as above -->
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
---
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
## 4. Module Dependencies
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
### 4.1 Dependency Matrix
|
|
94
|
+
| Module | Dependent Module | Dependency Type | Description |
|
|
95
|
+
|--------|------------------|-----------------|-------------|
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
### 4.2 Dependency Graph
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
```mermaid
|
|
100
|
+
graph TD
|
|
101
|
+
M01[M01 System Foundation] --> M02[M02 Module Name]
|
|
102
|
+
M01 --> M04[M04 Module Name]
|
|
103
|
+
M02 --> M03[M03 Module Name]
|
|
104
|
+
%% Draw directed acyclic graph based on dependency matrix
|
|
105
|
+
```
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
### 4.3 Circular Dependency Check
|
|
108
|
+
<!-- Must confirm no circular dependencies -->
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
---
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
## 5. Module Implementation Sequence
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
### 5.1 Implementation Phase Ordering
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
```mermaid
|
|
117
|
+
graph LR
|
|
118
|
+
P0[Phase 0: Infrastructure] --> P1[Phase 1: Core Entities]
|
|
119
|
+
P1 --> P2[Phase 2: Core Workflows]
|
|
120
|
+
P2 --> P3[Phase 3: Value-Added Features]
|
|
121
|
+
P3 --> P4[Phase 4: Data Analytics]
|
|
122
|
+
%% Adjust based on actual phases
|
|
123
|
+
```
|
|
124
|
+
|
|
125
|
+
### 5.2 Parallel Development Recommendations
|
|
126
|
+
| Phase | Parallel Modules | Description |
|
|
127
|
+
|-------|------------------|-------------|
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
---
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
## 6. Module Boundary Definition
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
### 6.1 Module Responsibility Boundaries
|
|
134
|
+
| Module | Core Responsibilities | Excluded Responsibilities | Boundary Notes |
|
|
135
|
+
|--------|----------------------|--------------------------|----------------|
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
137
|
+
### 6.2 Data Ownership
|
|
138
|
+
| Data Entity | Owner Module | Read-Only Modules | Description |
|
|
139
|
+
|-------------|--------------|-------------------|-------------|
|
|
140
|
+
|
|
141
|
+
---
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
## 7. Tech Stack Capability Reuse Analysis
|
|
144
|
+
|
|
145
|
+
### 7.1 Reusable Capabilities
|
|
146
|
+
| Required Function | Existing Capability | Reuse Level | Development Effort | Notes |
|
|
147
|
+
|-------------------|---------------------|-------------|--------------------|-------|
|
|
148
|
+
|
|
149
|
+
### 7.2 New Development Capabilities
|
|
150
|
+
| Capability | Module | Development Priority | Estimated Effort | Notes |
|
|
151
|
+
|------------|--------|---------------------|------------------|-------|
|
|
152
|
+
|
|
153
|
+
---
|
|
154
|
+
|
|
155
|
+
## 8. Risks & Mitigation Measures
|
|
156
|
+
|
|
157
|
+
### 8.1 Technical Risks
|
|
158
|
+
| Risk Item | Affected Modules | Impact Level | Probability | Mitigation Measures |
|
|
159
|
+
|-----------|------------------|--------------|-------------|---------------------|
|
|
160
|
+
|
|
161
|
+
### 8.2 Business Risks
|
|
162
|
+
| Risk Item | Affected Modules | Impact Level | Probability | Mitigation Measures |
|
|
163
|
+
|-----------|------------------|--------------|-------------|---------------------|
|
|
164
|
+
|
|
165
|
+
---
|
|
166
|
+
|
|
167
|
+
## 9. Module Summary
|
|
168
|
+
| Module ID | Module Name | Function Points | Priority | Implementation Phase | Dependencies | Core Responsibilities |
|
|
169
|
+
|-----------|-------------|-----------------|----------|---------------------|--------------|-----------------------|
|
|
170
|
+
|
|
171
|
+
---
|
|
172
|
+
|
|
173
|
+
## 10. Sign-off
|
|
174
|
+
| Role | Name | Date | Signature |
|
|
175
|
+
|------|------|------|-----------|
|
|
@@ -27,6 +27,12 @@
|
|
|
27
27
|
<field name="text">Manually write JSON files</field>
|
|
28
28
|
</block>
|
|
29
29
|
|
|
30
|
+
<block type="rule" id="R-MERMAID" level="mandatory" desc="All diagrams must use Mermaid syntax">
|
|
31
|
+
<field name="text">MANDATORY: All diagrams (domain model, dependency graph, implementation phases) MUST use Mermaid syntax.</field>
|
|
32
|
+
<field name="text">ASCII art diagrams are FORBIDDEN. Use graph TB, graph TD, graph LR as appropriate.</field>
|
|
33
|
+
<field name="text">Reference workspace-template/docs/rules/mermaid-rule.md for compatibility guidelines.</field>
|
|
34
|
+
</block>
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
30
36
|
<!-- ============================================================
|
|
31
37
|
Main Processing Sequence
|
|
32
38
|
============================================================ -->
|
|
@@ -161,8 +167,15 @@
|
|
|
161
167
|
</branch>
|
|
162
168
|
</block>
|
|
163
169
|
|
|
170
|
+
<!-- Read module design template -->
|
|
171
|
+
<block type="task" id="B10-TPL" action="read-file" desc="Read module design template">
|
|
172
|
+
<field name="path">${skill_path}/templates/MODULE-DESIGN-TEMPLATE.md</field>
|
|
173
|
+
<field name="output" var="template_content"/>
|
|
174
|
+
</block>
|
|
175
|
+
|
|
164
176
|
<!-- Step 4: Generate .module-design.md -->
|
|
165
177
|
<block type="task" id="B11" action="generate" desc="Generate module design document">
|
|
178
|
+
<field name="template" value="${template_content}"/>
|
|
166
179
|
<field name="output_path" value="${iteration_path}/01.product-requirement/.module-design.md"/>
|
|
167
180
|
<field name="sections">
|
|
168
181
|
- ISA-95 Analysis Summary (if complex)
|
|
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: speccrew-product-manager-orchestration
|
|
3
3
|
version: 2.0.0
|
|
4
|
-
description: Product Manager
|
|
4
|
+
description: Product Manager core orchestration skill (pure routing layer v2.0), responsible for workflow resume routing and dispatch-to-worker scheduling for each Phase Skill. All business logic is executed by independent Phase Skills.
|
|
5
5
|
tools: Read, Write, Glob, Grep, Bash, Agent
|
|
6
6
|
---
|
|
7
7
|
|
|
@@ -34,32 +34,32 @@ tools: Read, Write, Glob, Grep, Bash, Agent
|
|
|
34
34
|
|
|
35
35
|
# Product Manager Orchestration (v2.0)
|
|
36
36
|
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
37
|
+
Pure routing layer orchestration skill, responsible for:
|
|
38
38
|
|
|
39
|
-
1. **Workflow Initialization** - Phase 0
|
|
40
|
-
2. **Resume Routing** -
|
|
41
|
-
3. **Phase Dispatch** -
|
|
42
|
-
4. **User Confirmation Gates** - Phase 3
|
|
39
|
+
1. **Workflow Initialization** - Phase 0 initialization and returning resume target
|
|
40
|
+
2. **Resume Routing** - Jump to the correct Phase based on `resume_target`
|
|
41
|
+
3. **Phase Dispatch** - Each Phase has only one `dispatch-to-worker` call
|
|
42
|
+
4. **User Confirmation Gates** - Mandatory user confirmation gates for Phase 3 and Phase 4a
|
|
43
43
|
|
|
44
44
|
## Architecture: Pure Routing Layer
|
|
45
45
|
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
46
|
+
This Skill is a **pure routing layer**, all business logic is executed by independent Phase Skills:
|
|
47
47
|
|
|
48
48
|
| Phase | Block ID | Skill | Purpose |
|
|
49
49
|
|-------|----------|-------|---------|
|
|
50
|
-
| Phase 0 | P0 | `speccrew-pm-phase0-init` |
|
|
51
|
-
| Phase 1 | P1 | `speccrew-pm-phase1-knowledge-check` |
|
|
52
|
-
| Phase 2 | P2 | `speccrew-pm-phase2-complexity-assess` |
|
|
53
|
-
| Phase 3 | P3 | `speccrew-pm-requirement-clarify` |
|
|
54
|
-
| Phase 4 Simple | P4-SIMPLE | `speccrew-pm-requirement-simple` |
|
|
55
|
-
| Phase 4a | P4A | `speccrew-pm-requirement-model` |
|
|
56
|
-
| Phase 4b | P4B | `speccrew-pm-requirement-analysis` |
|
|
57
|
-
| Phase 5 | P5 | `speccrew-pm-phase5-subprd-dispatch` | Sub-PRD Worker
|
|
58
|
-
| Phase 6 | P6 | `speccrew-pm-phase6-verify-confirm` |
|
|
50
|
+
| Phase 0 | P0 | `speccrew-pm-phase0-init` | Workflow initialization, iteration directory creation/locating, resume state detection |
|
|
51
|
+
| Phase 1 | P1 | `speccrew-pm-phase1-knowledge-check` | Knowledge base status detection, module matching, knowledge initialization |
|
|
52
|
+
| Phase 2 | P2 | `speccrew-pm-phase2-complexity-assess` | Complexity assessment, simple/complex path decision |
|
|
53
|
+
| Phase 3 | P3 | `speccrew-pm-requirement-clarify` | Requirement clarification, Q&A collection |
|
|
54
|
+
| Phase 4 Simple | P4-SIMPLE | `speccrew-pm-requirement-simple` | Simple requirements: single PRD generation |
|
|
55
|
+
| Phase 4a | P4A | `speccrew-pm-requirement-model` | Complex requirements: ISA-95 modeling |
|
|
56
|
+
| Phase 4b | P4B | `speccrew-pm-requirement-analysis` | Complex requirements: Master PRD generation |
|
|
57
|
+
| Phase 5 | P5 | `speccrew-pm-phase5-subprd-dispatch` | Sub-PRD Worker dispatch |
|
|
58
|
+
| Phase 6 | P6 | `speccrew-pm-phase6-verify-confirm` | Verification checklist, user review, final confirmation |
|
|
59
59
|
|
|
60
60
|
## User Confirmation Gates (MANDATORY)
|
|
61
61
|
|
|
62
|
-
Phase 3
|
|
62
|
+
There are **mandatory user confirmation gates** after Phase 3 and Phase 4a:
|
|
63
63
|
|
|
64
64
|
### R-CONFIRM Rule Block
|
|
65
65
|
|
|
@@ -81,9 +81,9 @@ Phase 3 和 Phase 4a 之后有**强制性用户确认门禁**:
|
|
|
81
81
|
```
|
|
82
82
|
|
|
83
83
|
**Key Points:**
|
|
84
|
-
- `action="user-confirm"` —
|
|
85
|
-
- `skippable="false"` —
|
|
86
|
-
-
|
|
84
|
+
- `action="user-confirm"` — Must wait for explicit user confirmation
|
|
85
|
+
- `skippable="false"` — Cannot be skipped
|
|
86
|
+
- Checkpoint write **MUST** be executed after user confirmation
|
|
87
87
|
|
|
88
88
|
## Resume Router
|
|
89
89
|
|
|
@@ -114,18 +114,18 @@ Phase 0 输出 `resume_target` 控制恢复跳转:
|
|
|
114
114
|
|
|
115
115
|
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|
|
116
116
|
|-----------|------|----------|-------------|
|
|
117
|
-
| `user_requirement` | string | Yes |
|
|
118
|
-
| `workspace_root` | string | Yes | speccrew-workspace
|
|
119
|
-
| `source_path` | string | No |
|
|
120
|
-
| `language` | string | No |
|
|
117
|
+
| `user_requirement` | string | Yes | User requirement description or requirement document path |
|
|
118
|
+
| `workspace_root` | string | Yes | speccrew-workspace root directory path |
|
|
119
|
+
| `source_path` | string | No | Project source code root directory (read from .speccrewrc) |
|
|
120
|
+
| `language` | string | No | User language (default auto-detect) |
|
|
121
121
|
|
|
122
122
|
## Output
|
|
123
123
|
|
|
124
|
-
- `status` -
|
|
125
|
-
- `prd_files` -
|
|
126
|
-
- `feature_list` -
|
|
127
|
-
- `workflow_stage` -
|
|
128
|
-
- `next_agent` -
|
|
124
|
+
- `status` - Execution status (success / partial / failed)
|
|
125
|
+
- `prd_files` - List of generated PRD files
|
|
126
|
+
- `feature_list` - Feature list file path
|
|
127
|
+
- `workflow_stage` - Current workflow stage status
|
|
128
|
+
- `next_agent` - Recommended next Agent
|
|
129
129
|
|
|
130
130
|
---
|
|
131
131
|
|