speccrew 0.7.18 → 0.7.20
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/.speccrew/agents/speccrew-product-manager.md +63 -6
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-requirement-model/SKILL.md +10 -0
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-requirement-model/templates/MODULE-DESIGN-TEMPLATE.md +175 -0
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-pm-requirement-model/workflow.agentflow.xml +13 -0
- package/.speccrew/skills/speccrew-product-manager-orchestration/SKILL.md +29 -29
- package/package.json +1 -1
|
@@ -51,6 +51,54 @@ When involving related domains:
|
|
|
51
51
|
- `{workspace_path}/knowledge/domain/glossary/` → Business terminology glossary
|
|
52
52
|
- `{workspace_path}/knowledge/domain/qa/` → Common problem solutions
|
|
53
53
|
|
|
54
|
+
# 🛑 CRITICAL: dispatch-to-worker 执行协议
|
|
55
|
+
|
|
56
|
+
### 定义
|
|
57
|
+
当 orchestration workflow 中出现 `action="dispatch-to-worker"` 时:
|
|
58
|
+
|
|
59
|
+
**你(PM Agent)必须:**
|
|
60
|
+
1. 使用 **Agent tool** 创建一个新的子 Agent
|
|
61
|
+
2. 子 Agent 角色指定为 **speccrew-task-worker**
|
|
62
|
+
3. 在 Task 描述中传递 Skill 名称和所有 context 参数
|
|
63
|
+
4. **等待 Worker 完成**后再继续下一个 block
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
**你(PM Agent)绝对不能:**
|
|
66
|
+
- ❌ 用 Skill tool 直接调用 Phase Skill
|
|
67
|
+
- ❌ 自己运行脚本(包括 update-progress.js)
|
|
68
|
+
- ❌ 自己读写业务文件(如 .clarification-summary.md)
|
|
69
|
+
- ❌ 把 "dispatch" 理解为 "自己执行"
|
|
70
|
+
|
|
71
|
+
### 正确 vs 错误示例
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
**❌ 错误 — PM 自己执行:**
|
|
74
|
+
```
|
|
75
|
+
PM 读取需求文件 → PM 生成澄清总结 → PM 运行 update-progress.js
|
|
76
|
+
```
|
|
77
|
+
|
|
78
|
+
**✅ 正确 — PM dispatch 给 Worker:**
|
|
79
|
+
```
|
|
80
|
+
PM 用 Agent tool 创建 speccrew-task-worker 子 Agent
|
|
81
|
+
→ 传递: skill=speccrew-pm-requirement-clarify, context={...}
|
|
82
|
+
→ Worker 加载 Skill 并执行所有步骤
|
|
83
|
+
→ Worker 返回结果给 PM
|
|
84
|
+
PM 继续下一个 orchestration block
|
|
85
|
+
```
|
|
86
|
+
|
|
87
|
+
### 适用范围:ALL Phases (0-6)
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
| Phase | Skill 名称 | dispatch? |
|
|
90
|
+
|-------|-----------|-----------|
|
|
91
|
+
| Phase 0 | speccrew-pm-phase0-init | ✅ dispatch-to-worker |
|
|
92
|
+
| Phase 1 | speccrew-pm-phase1-knowledge-check | ✅ dispatch-to-worker |
|
|
93
|
+
| Phase 2 | speccrew-pm-phase2-complexity-assess | ✅ dispatch-to-worker |
|
|
94
|
+
| Phase 3 | speccrew-pm-requirement-clarify | ✅ dispatch-to-worker |
|
|
95
|
+
| Phase 4a | speccrew-pm-requirement-model | ✅ dispatch-to-worker |
|
|
96
|
+
| Phase 4b | speccrew-pm-requirement-analysis | ✅ dispatch-to-worker |
|
|
97
|
+
| Phase 5 | speccrew-pm-phase5-subprd-dispatch | ✅ dispatch-to-worker |
|
|
98
|
+
| Phase 6 | speccrew-pm-phase6-verify-confirm | ✅ dispatch-to-worker |
|
|
99
|
+
|
|
100
|
+
---
|
|
101
|
+
|
|
54
102
|
# Workflow
|
|
55
103
|
|
|
56
104
|
## AgentFlow Definition
|
|
@@ -241,8 +289,9 @@ After Phase 1 completes, store:
|
|
|
241
289
|
|
|
242
290
|
## Phase 4: Invoke PRD Skill
|
|
243
291
|
|
|
244
|
-
> ⚠️ **PM AGENT ORCHESTRATION PRINCIPLE (
|
|
292
|
+
> ⚠️ **PM AGENT ORCHESTRATION PRINCIPLE (ALL PHASES 0-6)**
|
|
245
293
|
> You are the ORCHESTRATOR, NOT the WRITER:
|
|
294
|
+
> - Phase 0-3: DO NOT run scripts or create files yourself → Dispatch Worker
|
|
246
295
|
> - Phase 4a (Model): DO NOT do ISA-95 analysis yourself → Dispatch Worker
|
|
247
296
|
> - Phase 4a.5 (Confirm): MUST stop for user confirmation after module design
|
|
248
297
|
> - Phase 4b (Generate): DO NOT generate Master PRD yourself → Dispatch Worker
|
|
@@ -597,12 +646,20 @@ Phase 0 → Phase 1 → Phase 2 → Phase 3 → Phase 4 → Phase 5 (if complex)
|
|
|
597
646
|
- **NEVER assume requirement completeness** — clarification skill handles all verification
|
|
598
647
|
- **IF clarification skill fails: ABORT** — do NOT generate clarification yourself
|
|
599
648
|
|
|
600
|
-
## MANDATORY WORKER DISPATCH RULE
|
|
649
|
+
## MANDATORY WORKER DISPATCH RULE (ALL PHASES)
|
|
650
|
+
|
|
651
|
+
🛑 **UNIVERSAL**: PM Agent 在所有 Phase (0-6) 中都必须通过 Agent tool 创建 speccrew-task-worker 子 Agent 来执行 Skill。
|
|
652
|
+
|
|
653
|
+
**执行方式:**
|
|
654
|
+
- 每个 Phase Skill 都通过 Agent tool 创建子 Agent(speccrew-task-worker)
|
|
655
|
+
- Worker Agent 接收 Skill 名称和 context 参数后自行加载执行
|
|
656
|
+
- PM Agent 等待 Worker 完成后继续 orchestration 流程
|
|
601
657
|
|
|
602
|
-
|
|
603
|
-
-
|
|
604
|
-
-
|
|
605
|
-
-
|
|
658
|
+
**禁止行为:**
|
|
659
|
+
- ❌ PM 直接执行任何 Phase Skill
|
|
660
|
+
- ❌ PM 直接运行脚本(update-progress.js 等)
|
|
661
|
+
- ❌ PM 直接创建/修改业务文档(.clarification-summary.md、.module-design.md 等)
|
|
662
|
+
- ❌ PM 用 Skill tool 调用 Phase Skill(必须用 Agent tool)
|
|
606
663
|
|
|
607
664
|
## MANDATORY TEMPLATE PATH
|
|
608
665
|
|
|
@@ -76,3 +76,13 @@ Applies ISA-95 Stages 1-3 as structured analysis framework:
|
|
|
76
76
|
- Include technical implementation details
|
|
77
77
|
- Create circular module dependencies
|
|
78
78
|
- Manually write JSON files
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
### Diagram Format Rule (MANDATORY)
|
|
81
|
+
- All diagrams MUST use Mermaid syntax (graph TB, graph TD, graph LR, etc.)
|
|
82
|
+
- ASCII art diagrams are FORBIDDEN
|
|
83
|
+
- Reference `mermaid-rule.md` for compatibility
|
|
84
|
+
|
|
85
|
+
### Template
|
|
86
|
+
- Module design document MUST follow `templates/MODULE-DESIGN-TEMPLATE.md` structure
|
|
87
|
+
- All 10 sections are required
|
|
88
|
+
- Fill template with analyzed data from ISA-95 stages
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,175 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
# Module Design Document (.module-design.md)
|
|
2
|
+
|
|
3
|
+
> **Iteration**: iteration_name
|
|
4
|
+
> **Generated**: date
|
|
5
|
+
> **System**: system_name
|
|
6
|
+
> **Tech Stack**: tech_stack
|
|
7
|
+
> **Document Type**: ISA-95 Business Modeling & Module Decomposition
|
|
8
|
+
|
|
9
|
+
---
|
|
10
|
+
|
|
11
|
+
## 1. Business Domain Analysis (ISA-95 Stage 1: Domain Description)
|
|
12
|
+
|
|
13
|
+
### 1.1 Domain Boundary Definition
|
|
14
|
+
|
|
15
|
+
<!-- Describe system positioning -->
|
|
16
|
+
|
|
17
|
+
#### System Scope (IN-SCOPE)
|
|
18
|
+
| Domain | Description |
|
|
19
|
+
|--------|-------------|
|
|
20
|
+
| domain | description |
|
|
21
|
+
|
|
22
|
+
#### Out of Scope (OUT-OF-SCOPE)
|
|
23
|
+
| Domain | Description | Planned Phase |
|
|
24
|
+
|--------|-------------|---------------|
|
|
25
|
+
| domain | description | phase |
|
|
26
|
+
|
|
27
|
+
### 1.2 Actor Definition
|
|
28
|
+
| Actor ID | Actor Name | Responsibilities | Data Scope | Typical Scenario |
|
|
29
|
+
|----------|------------|------------------|------------|------------------|
|
|
30
|
+
| role_id | role_name | responsibility | data_scope | scenario |
|
|
31
|
+
|
|
32
|
+
### 1.3 Core Business Glossary
|
|
33
|
+
| Term | Definition | Business Rule | Related Module |
|
|
34
|
+
|------|------------|---------------|----------------|
|
|
35
|
+
| term | definition | rule | module |
|
|
36
|
+
|
|
37
|
+
### 1.4 Domain Model Diagram
|
|
38
|
+
|
|
39
|
+
```mermaid
|
|
40
|
+
graph TB
|
|
41
|
+
M01[M01 System Foundation] --> M02[M02 Module Name]
|
|
42
|
+
M01 --> M04[M04 Module Name]
|
|
43
|
+
M02 --> M03[M03 Module Name]
|
|
44
|
+
%% Draw based on actual module dependencies
|
|
45
|
+
```
|
|
46
|
+
|
|
47
|
+
---
|
|
48
|
+
|
|
49
|
+
## 2. Function Decomposition (ISA-95 Stage 2: Functions in Domain)
|
|
50
|
+
|
|
51
|
+
### 2.1 WBS Work Breakdown Structure
|
|
52
|
+
|
|
53
|
+
#### module_id - module_name (count function points)
|
|
54
|
+
| Function ID | Function Name | Description | Priority | Dependencies |
|
|
55
|
+
|-------------|---------------|-------------|----------|--------------|
|
|
56
|
+
| func_id | func_name | description | priority | dependency |
|
|
57
|
+
|
|
58
|
+
### 2.2 Function Priority Distribution
|
|
59
|
+
| Priority | Function Points | Percentage | Module Distribution |
|
|
60
|
+
|----------|-----------------|------------|--------------------|
|
|
61
|
+
| **P0 (Core)** | count | percent | modules |
|
|
62
|
+
| **P1 (Important)** | count | percent | modules |
|
|
63
|
+
| **P2 (Optional)** | count | percent | modules |
|
|
64
|
+
|
|
65
|
+
---
|
|
66
|
+
|
|
67
|
+
## 3. Module Priority & Phasing (ISA-95 Stage 3: Functions of Interest)
|
|
68
|
+
|
|
69
|
+
### 3.1 MoSCoW Priority Analysis
|
|
70
|
+
| Priority | Definition | Module | Description |
|
|
71
|
+
|----------|------------|--------|-------------|
|
|
72
|
+
|
|
73
|
+
### 3.2 Implementation Phases
|
|
74
|
+
|
|
75
|
+
#### Phase 1 (MVP - Minimum Viable Product)
|
|
76
|
+
**Core Chain**: core_chain
|
|
77
|
+
| Module | Function Points | Deliverables |
|
|
78
|
+
|--------|-----------------|--------------|
|
|
79
|
+
|
|
80
|
+
**MVP Acceptance Criteria**:
|
|
81
|
+
- ✅ criteria
|
|
82
|
+
|
|
83
|
+
#### Phase 2 (Full Version - Stage 1)
|
|
84
|
+
<!-- Same structure as above -->
|
|
85
|
+
|
|
86
|
+
#### Phase 3 (Stage 2 Planning)
|
|
87
|
+
<!-- Same structure as above -->
|
|
88
|
+
|
|
89
|
+
---
|
|
90
|
+
|
|
91
|
+
## 4. Module Dependencies
|
|
92
|
+
|
|
93
|
+
### 4.1 Dependency Matrix
|
|
94
|
+
| Module | Dependent Module | Dependency Type | Description |
|
|
95
|
+
|--------|------------------|-----------------|-------------|
|
|
96
|
+
|
|
97
|
+
### 4.2 Dependency Graph
|
|
98
|
+
|
|
99
|
+
```mermaid
|
|
100
|
+
graph TD
|
|
101
|
+
M01[M01 System Foundation] --> M02[M02 Module Name]
|
|
102
|
+
M01 --> M04[M04 Module Name]
|
|
103
|
+
M02 --> M03[M03 Module Name]
|
|
104
|
+
%% Draw directed acyclic graph based on dependency matrix
|
|
105
|
+
```
|
|
106
|
+
|
|
107
|
+
### 4.3 Circular Dependency Check
|
|
108
|
+
<!-- Must confirm no circular dependencies -->
|
|
109
|
+
|
|
110
|
+
---
|
|
111
|
+
|
|
112
|
+
## 5. Module Implementation Sequence
|
|
113
|
+
|
|
114
|
+
### 5.1 Implementation Phase Ordering
|
|
115
|
+
|
|
116
|
+
```mermaid
|
|
117
|
+
graph LR
|
|
118
|
+
P0[Phase 0: Infrastructure] --> P1[Phase 1: Core Entities]
|
|
119
|
+
P1 --> P2[Phase 2: Core Workflows]
|
|
120
|
+
P2 --> P3[Phase 3: Value-Added Features]
|
|
121
|
+
P3 --> P4[Phase 4: Data Analytics]
|
|
122
|
+
%% Adjust based on actual phases
|
|
123
|
+
```
|
|
124
|
+
|
|
125
|
+
### 5.2 Parallel Development Recommendations
|
|
126
|
+
| Phase | Parallel Modules | Description |
|
|
127
|
+
|-------|------------------|-------------|
|
|
128
|
+
|
|
129
|
+
---
|
|
130
|
+
|
|
131
|
+
## 6. Module Boundary Definition
|
|
132
|
+
|
|
133
|
+
### 6.1 Module Responsibility Boundaries
|
|
134
|
+
| Module | Core Responsibilities | Excluded Responsibilities | Boundary Notes |
|
|
135
|
+
|--------|----------------------|--------------------------|----------------|
|
|
136
|
+
|
|
137
|
+
### 6.2 Data Ownership
|
|
138
|
+
| Data Entity | Owner Module | Read-Only Modules | Description |
|
|
139
|
+
|-------------|--------------|-------------------|-------------|
|
|
140
|
+
|
|
141
|
+
---
|
|
142
|
+
|
|
143
|
+
## 7. Tech Stack Capability Reuse Analysis
|
|
144
|
+
|
|
145
|
+
### 7.1 Reusable Capabilities
|
|
146
|
+
| Required Function | Existing Capability | Reuse Level | Development Effort | Notes |
|
|
147
|
+
|-------------------|---------------------|-------------|--------------------|-------|
|
|
148
|
+
|
|
149
|
+
### 7.2 New Development Capabilities
|
|
150
|
+
| Capability | Module | Development Priority | Estimated Effort | Notes |
|
|
151
|
+
|------------|--------|---------------------|------------------|-------|
|
|
152
|
+
|
|
153
|
+
---
|
|
154
|
+
|
|
155
|
+
## 8. Risks & Mitigation Measures
|
|
156
|
+
|
|
157
|
+
### 8.1 Technical Risks
|
|
158
|
+
| Risk Item | Affected Modules | Impact Level | Probability | Mitigation Measures |
|
|
159
|
+
|-----------|------------------|--------------|-------------|---------------------|
|
|
160
|
+
|
|
161
|
+
### 8.2 Business Risks
|
|
162
|
+
| Risk Item | Affected Modules | Impact Level | Probability | Mitigation Measures |
|
|
163
|
+
|-----------|------------------|--------------|-------------|---------------------|
|
|
164
|
+
|
|
165
|
+
---
|
|
166
|
+
|
|
167
|
+
## 9. Module Summary
|
|
168
|
+
| Module ID | Module Name | Function Points | Priority | Implementation Phase | Dependencies | Core Responsibilities |
|
|
169
|
+
|-----------|-------------|-----------------|----------|---------------------|--------------|-----------------------|
|
|
170
|
+
|
|
171
|
+
---
|
|
172
|
+
|
|
173
|
+
## 10. Sign-off
|
|
174
|
+
| Role | Name | Date | Signature |
|
|
175
|
+
|------|------|------|-----------|
|
|
@@ -27,6 +27,12 @@
|
|
|
27
27
|
<field name="text">Manually write JSON files</field>
|
|
28
28
|
</block>
|
|
29
29
|
|
|
30
|
+
<block type="rule" id="R-MERMAID" level="mandatory" desc="All diagrams must use Mermaid syntax">
|
|
31
|
+
<field name="text">MANDATORY: All diagrams (domain model, dependency graph, implementation phases) MUST use Mermaid syntax.</field>
|
|
32
|
+
<field name="text">ASCII art diagrams are FORBIDDEN. Use graph TB, graph TD, graph LR as appropriate.</field>
|
|
33
|
+
<field name="text">Reference workspace-template/docs/rules/mermaid-rule.md for compatibility guidelines.</field>
|
|
34
|
+
</block>
|
|
35
|
+
|
|
30
36
|
<!-- ============================================================
|
|
31
37
|
Main Processing Sequence
|
|
32
38
|
============================================================ -->
|
|
@@ -161,8 +167,15 @@
|
|
|
161
167
|
</branch>
|
|
162
168
|
</block>
|
|
163
169
|
|
|
170
|
+
<!-- Read module design template -->
|
|
171
|
+
<block type="task" id="B10-TPL" action="read-file" desc="Read module design template">
|
|
172
|
+
<field name="path">${skill_path}/templates/MODULE-DESIGN-TEMPLATE.md</field>
|
|
173
|
+
<field name="output" var="template_content"/>
|
|
174
|
+
</block>
|
|
175
|
+
|
|
164
176
|
<!-- Step 4: Generate .module-design.md -->
|
|
165
177
|
<block type="task" id="B11" action="generate" desc="Generate module design document">
|
|
178
|
+
<field name="template" value="${template_content}"/>
|
|
166
179
|
<field name="output_path" value="${iteration_path}/01.product-requirement/.module-design.md"/>
|
|
167
180
|
<field name="sections">
|
|
168
181
|
- ISA-95 Analysis Summary (if complex)
|
|
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
|
|
|
1
1
|
---
|
|
2
2
|
name: speccrew-product-manager-orchestration
|
|
3
3
|
version: 2.0.0
|
|
4
|
-
description: Product Manager
|
|
4
|
+
description: Product Manager core orchestration skill (pure routing layer v2.0), responsible for workflow resume routing and dispatch-to-worker scheduling for each Phase Skill. All business logic is executed by independent Phase Skills.
|
|
5
5
|
tools: Read, Write, Glob, Grep, Bash, Agent
|
|
6
6
|
---
|
|
7
7
|
|
|
@@ -34,32 +34,32 @@ tools: Read, Write, Glob, Grep, Bash, Agent
|
|
|
34
34
|
|
|
35
35
|
# Product Manager Orchestration (v2.0)
|
|
36
36
|
|
|
37
|
-
|
|
37
|
+
Pure routing layer orchestration skill, responsible for:
|
|
38
38
|
|
|
39
|
-
1. **Workflow Initialization** - Phase 0
|
|
40
|
-
2. **Resume Routing** -
|
|
41
|
-
3. **Phase Dispatch** -
|
|
42
|
-
4. **User Confirmation Gates** - Phase 3
|
|
39
|
+
1. **Workflow Initialization** - Phase 0 initialization and returning resume target
|
|
40
|
+
2. **Resume Routing** - Jump to the correct Phase based on `resume_target`
|
|
41
|
+
3. **Phase Dispatch** - Each Phase has only one `dispatch-to-worker` call
|
|
42
|
+
4. **User Confirmation Gates** - Mandatory user confirmation gates for Phase 3 and Phase 4a
|
|
43
43
|
|
|
44
44
|
## Architecture: Pure Routing Layer
|
|
45
45
|
|
|
46
|
-
|
|
46
|
+
This Skill is a **pure routing layer**, all business logic is executed by independent Phase Skills:
|
|
47
47
|
|
|
48
48
|
| Phase | Block ID | Skill | Purpose |
|
|
49
49
|
|-------|----------|-------|---------|
|
|
50
|
-
| Phase 0 | P0 | `speccrew-pm-phase0-init` |
|
|
51
|
-
| Phase 1 | P1 | `speccrew-pm-phase1-knowledge-check` |
|
|
52
|
-
| Phase 2 | P2 | `speccrew-pm-phase2-complexity-assess` |
|
|
53
|
-
| Phase 3 | P3 | `speccrew-pm-requirement-clarify` |
|
|
54
|
-
| Phase 4 Simple | P4-SIMPLE | `speccrew-pm-requirement-simple` |
|
|
55
|
-
| Phase 4a | P4A | `speccrew-pm-requirement-model` |
|
|
56
|
-
| Phase 4b | P4B | `speccrew-pm-requirement-analysis` |
|
|
57
|
-
| Phase 5 | P5 | `speccrew-pm-phase5-subprd-dispatch` | Sub-PRD Worker
|
|
58
|
-
| Phase 6 | P6 | `speccrew-pm-phase6-verify-confirm` |
|
|
50
|
+
| Phase 0 | P0 | `speccrew-pm-phase0-init` | Workflow initialization, iteration directory creation/locating, resume state detection |
|
|
51
|
+
| Phase 1 | P1 | `speccrew-pm-phase1-knowledge-check` | Knowledge base status detection, module matching, knowledge initialization |
|
|
52
|
+
| Phase 2 | P2 | `speccrew-pm-phase2-complexity-assess` | Complexity assessment, simple/complex path decision |
|
|
53
|
+
| Phase 3 | P3 | `speccrew-pm-requirement-clarify` | Requirement clarification, Q&A collection |
|
|
54
|
+
| Phase 4 Simple | P4-SIMPLE | `speccrew-pm-requirement-simple` | Simple requirements: single PRD generation |
|
|
55
|
+
| Phase 4a | P4A | `speccrew-pm-requirement-model` | Complex requirements: ISA-95 modeling |
|
|
56
|
+
| Phase 4b | P4B | `speccrew-pm-requirement-analysis` | Complex requirements: Master PRD generation |
|
|
57
|
+
| Phase 5 | P5 | `speccrew-pm-phase5-subprd-dispatch` | Sub-PRD Worker dispatch |
|
|
58
|
+
| Phase 6 | P6 | `speccrew-pm-phase6-verify-confirm` | Verification checklist, user review, final confirmation |
|
|
59
59
|
|
|
60
60
|
## User Confirmation Gates (MANDATORY)
|
|
61
61
|
|
|
62
|
-
Phase 3
|
|
62
|
+
There are **mandatory user confirmation gates** after Phase 3 and Phase 4a:
|
|
63
63
|
|
|
64
64
|
### R-CONFIRM Rule Block
|
|
65
65
|
|
|
@@ -81,9 +81,9 @@ Phase 3 和 Phase 4a 之后有**强制性用户确认门禁**:
|
|
|
81
81
|
```
|
|
82
82
|
|
|
83
83
|
**Key Points:**
|
|
84
|
-
- `action="user-confirm"` —
|
|
85
|
-
- `skippable="false"` —
|
|
86
|
-
-
|
|
84
|
+
- `action="user-confirm"` — Must wait for explicit user confirmation
|
|
85
|
+
- `skippable="false"` — Cannot be skipped
|
|
86
|
+
- Checkpoint write **MUST** be executed after user confirmation
|
|
87
87
|
|
|
88
88
|
## Resume Router
|
|
89
89
|
|
|
@@ -114,18 +114,18 @@ Phase 0 输出 `resume_target` 控制恢复跳转:
|
|
|
114
114
|
|
|
115
115
|
| Parameter | Type | Required | Description |
|
|
116
116
|
|-----------|------|----------|-------------|
|
|
117
|
-
| `user_requirement` | string | Yes |
|
|
118
|
-
| `workspace_root` | string | Yes | speccrew-workspace
|
|
119
|
-
| `source_path` | string | No |
|
|
120
|
-
| `language` | string | No |
|
|
117
|
+
| `user_requirement` | string | Yes | User requirement description or requirement document path |
|
|
118
|
+
| `workspace_root` | string | Yes | speccrew-workspace root directory path |
|
|
119
|
+
| `source_path` | string | No | Project source code root directory (read from .speccrewrc) |
|
|
120
|
+
| `language` | string | No | User language (default auto-detect) |
|
|
121
121
|
|
|
122
122
|
## Output
|
|
123
123
|
|
|
124
|
-
- `status` -
|
|
125
|
-
- `prd_files` -
|
|
126
|
-
- `feature_list` -
|
|
127
|
-
- `workflow_stage` -
|
|
128
|
-
- `next_agent` -
|
|
124
|
+
- `status` - Execution status (success / partial / failed)
|
|
125
|
+
- `prd_files` - List of generated PRD files
|
|
126
|
+
- `feature_list` - Feature list file path
|
|
127
|
+
- `workflow_stage` - Current workflow stage status
|
|
128
|
+
- `next_agent` - Recommended next Agent
|
|
129
129
|
|
|
130
130
|
---
|
|
131
131
|
|