snow-flow 3.0.10 → 3.0.13
This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
- package/dist/mcp/intelligent-reporting-mcp.d.ts +7 -0
- package/dist/mcp/intelligent-reporting-mcp.js +379 -0
- package/dist/mcp/servicenow-reporting-analytics-mcp.js +147 -10
- package/dist/services/widget-deployment-service.d.ts +2 -1
- package/dist/services/widget-deployment-service.js +17 -16
- package/dist/utils/anti-mock-data-validator.d.ts +66 -0
- package/dist/utils/anti-mock-data-validator.js +316 -0
- package/dist/utils/servicenow-eventual-consistency.d.ts +120 -0
- package/dist/utils/servicenow-eventual-consistency.js +220 -0
- package/package.json +4 -3
|
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ exports.widgetDeployment = exports.WidgetDeploymentService = void 0;
|
|
|
9
9
|
const servicenow_client_js_1 = require("../utils/servicenow-client.js");
|
|
10
10
|
const logger_js_1 = require("../utils/logger.js");
|
|
11
11
|
const unified_auth_store_js_1 = require("../utils/unified-auth-store.js");
|
|
12
|
+
const servicenow_eventual_consistency_js_1 = require("../utils/servicenow-eventual-consistency.js");
|
|
12
13
|
class WidgetDeploymentService {
|
|
13
14
|
constructor() {
|
|
14
15
|
this.client = null;
|
|
@@ -68,8 +69,13 @@ class WidgetDeploymentService {
|
|
|
68
69
|
const result = await this.createWidget(client, widgetData);
|
|
69
70
|
sys_id = result.sys_id;
|
|
70
71
|
}
|
|
71
|
-
// Verify deployment
|
|
72
|
+
// Verify deployment with eventual consistency handling
|
|
72
73
|
const verified = await this.verifyDeployment(client, sys_id);
|
|
74
|
+
// Log verification result with context
|
|
75
|
+
if (!verified) {
|
|
76
|
+
this.logger.warn(`⚠️ Verification returned false - this may be a ServiceNow timing issue`);
|
|
77
|
+
this.logger.info(`🔗 Direct verification link: https://${client.instance || 'instance'}.service-now.com/sp_widget.do?sys_id=${sys_id}`);
|
|
78
|
+
}
|
|
73
79
|
// Get widget details for response
|
|
74
80
|
const widgetDetails = await this.getWidgetDetails(client, sys_id);
|
|
75
81
|
return {
|
|
@@ -78,8 +84,8 @@ class WidgetDeploymentService {
|
|
|
78
84
|
portalUrl: this.buildPortalUrl(client, sys_id),
|
|
79
85
|
apiEndpoint: this.buildApiEndpoint(client, sys_id),
|
|
80
86
|
message: isUpdate
|
|
81
|
-
? `Widget '${config.name}' updated successfully`
|
|
82
|
-
: `Widget '${config.name}' created successfully`,
|
|
87
|
+
? `Widget '${config.name}' updated successfully${!verified ? ' (verification pending - check ServiceNow directly)' : ''}`
|
|
88
|
+
: `Widget '${config.name}' created successfully${!verified ? ' (verification pending - check ServiceNow directly)' : ''}`,
|
|
83
89
|
verificationStatus: verified ? 'verified' : 'unverified'
|
|
84
90
|
};
|
|
85
91
|
}
|
|
@@ -150,22 +156,17 @@ class WidgetDeploymentService {
|
|
|
150
156
|
await client.updateRecord('sp_widget', sys_id, widgetData);
|
|
151
157
|
}
|
|
152
158
|
/**
|
|
153
|
-
* Verify widget deployment
|
|
159
|
+
* Verify widget deployment with retry logic for eventual consistency
|
|
160
|
+
* ServiceNow has database replication lag of 1-3 seconds
|
|
154
161
|
*/
|
|
155
162
|
async verifyDeployment(client, sys_id) {
|
|
156
|
-
|
|
157
|
-
|
|
158
|
-
|
|
159
|
-
|
|
160
|
-
|
|
161
|
-
}
|
|
162
|
-
this.logger.warn('Widget verification failed - sys_id mismatch');
|
|
163
|
-
return false;
|
|
164
|
-
}
|
|
165
|
-
catch (error) {
|
|
166
|
-
this.logger.error('Widget verification failed:', error);
|
|
167
|
-
return false;
|
|
163
|
+
const result = await servicenow_eventual_consistency_js_1.widgetConsistency.verifyRecordExists(client, 'sp_widget', sys_id, servicenow_eventual_consistency_js_1.CONSISTENCY_CONFIGS.WIDGET);
|
|
164
|
+
if (!result.success && result.isLikelyTimingIssue) {
|
|
165
|
+
this.logger.warn(`⚠️ Widget verification failed after ${result.attempts} attempts`);
|
|
166
|
+
this.logger.warn(`⚠️ This appears to be a ServiceNow timing issue, not a deployment failure`);
|
|
167
|
+
this.logger.info(`🔗 Check directly: https://${client.instance}/sp_widget.do?sys_id=${sys_id}`);
|
|
168
168
|
}
|
|
169
|
+
return result.success;
|
|
169
170
|
}
|
|
170
171
|
/**
|
|
171
172
|
* Get widget details
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
/**
|
|
2
|
+
* Anti-Mock Data Validator
|
|
3
|
+
*
|
|
4
|
+
* This utility ensures NO mock, demo, sample, or fake data is ever used in any MCP tools.
|
|
5
|
+
* All data must come from real ServiceNow instances.
|
|
6
|
+
*/
|
|
7
|
+
interface ValidationResult {
|
|
8
|
+
isValid: boolean;
|
|
9
|
+
violations: string[];
|
|
10
|
+
suspiciousFields: string[];
|
|
11
|
+
suspiciousValues: any[];
|
|
12
|
+
}
|
|
13
|
+
interface DataIntegrityCheck {
|
|
14
|
+
hasRealData: boolean;
|
|
15
|
+
dataQualityScore: number;
|
|
16
|
+
mockDataDetected: boolean;
|
|
17
|
+
details: string[];
|
|
18
|
+
}
|
|
19
|
+
export declare class AntiMockDataValidator {
|
|
20
|
+
private logger;
|
|
21
|
+
private readonly MOCK_DATA_PATTERNS;
|
|
22
|
+
private readonly SUSPICIOUS_NUMERIC_PATTERNS;
|
|
23
|
+
constructor();
|
|
24
|
+
/**
|
|
25
|
+
* Validate that dataset contains only real ServiceNow data
|
|
26
|
+
*/
|
|
27
|
+
validateDataset(data: any[], source?: string): ValidationResult;
|
|
28
|
+
/**
|
|
29
|
+
* Validate individual field value
|
|
30
|
+
*/
|
|
31
|
+
private validateFieldValue;
|
|
32
|
+
/**
|
|
33
|
+
* Validate patterns across the entire dataset
|
|
34
|
+
*/
|
|
35
|
+
private validateDatasetPatterns;
|
|
36
|
+
/**
|
|
37
|
+
* Count sequential sys_id patterns
|
|
38
|
+
*/
|
|
39
|
+
private countSequentialIds;
|
|
40
|
+
/**
|
|
41
|
+
* Check if two sys_ids are sequential
|
|
42
|
+
*/
|
|
43
|
+
private areIdsSequential;
|
|
44
|
+
/**
|
|
45
|
+
* Count records created at exactly the same time
|
|
46
|
+
*/
|
|
47
|
+
private countSimultaneousCreations;
|
|
48
|
+
/**
|
|
49
|
+
* Perform comprehensive data integrity check
|
|
50
|
+
*/
|
|
51
|
+
performDataIntegrityCheck(data: any[], source?: string): DataIntegrityCheck;
|
|
52
|
+
/**
|
|
53
|
+
* Enforce zero tolerance policy for mock data
|
|
54
|
+
*/
|
|
55
|
+
enforceZeroTolerancePolicy(data: any[], source?: string): void;
|
|
56
|
+
/**
|
|
57
|
+
* Generate validation report
|
|
58
|
+
*/
|
|
59
|
+
generateValidationReport(data: any[], source?: string): string;
|
|
60
|
+
}
|
|
61
|
+
export declare const antiMockValidator: AntiMockDataValidator;
|
|
62
|
+
export declare const validateRealData: (data: any[], source?: string) => void;
|
|
63
|
+
export declare const checkDataIntegrity: (data: any[], source?: string) => DataIntegrityCheck;
|
|
64
|
+
export declare const generateDataReport: (data: any[], source?: string) => string;
|
|
65
|
+
export {};
|
|
66
|
+
//# sourceMappingURL=anti-mock-data-validator.d.ts.map
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,316 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
"use strict";
|
|
2
|
+
/**
|
|
3
|
+
* Anti-Mock Data Validator
|
|
4
|
+
*
|
|
5
|
+
* This utility ensures NO mock, demo, sample, or fake data is ever used in any MCP tools.
|
|
6
|
+
* All data must come from real ServiceNow instances.
|
|
7
|
+
*/
|
|
8
|
+
Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
|
|
9
|
+
exports.generateDataReport = exports.checkDataIntegrity = exports.validateRealData = exports.antiMockValidator = exports.AntiMockDataValidator = void 0;
|
|
10
|
+
const logger_js_1 = require("./logger.js");
|
|
11
|
+
class AntiMockDataValidator {
|
|
12
|
+
constructor() {
|
|
13
|
+
// Patterns that indicate mock/demo/test data
|
|
14
|
+
this.MOCK_DATA_PATTERNS = [
|
|
15
|
+
// Explicit mock indicators
|
|
16
|
+
/\bmock\b/i,
|
|
17
|
+
/\bdemo\b/i,
|
|
18
|
+
/\bsample\b/i,
|
|
19
|
+
/\btest\b/i,
|
|
20
|
+
/\bfake\b/i,
|
|
21
|
+
/\bplaceholder\b/i,
|
|
22
|
+
/\bdummy\b/i,
|
|
23
|
+
/\bexample\b/i,
|
|
24
|
+
// Common test values
|
|
25
|
+
/^test$/i,
|
|
26
|
+
/^demo$/i,
|
|
27
|
+
/test.*user/i,
|
|
28
|
+
/demo.*user/i,
|
|
29
|
+
/sample.*data/i,
|
|
30
|
+
/example.*com/i,
|
|
31
|
+
/test@test\.com/i,
|
|
32
|
+
/demo@demo\.com/i,
|
|
33
|
+
// Sequential test patterns
|
|
34
|
+
/test\d+/i,
|
|
35
|
+
/demo\d+/i,
|
|
36
|
+
/user\d+$/i,
|
|
37
|
+
/item\d+$/i,
|
|
38
|
+
// Placeholder values
|
|
39
|
+
/^n\/a$/i,
|
|
40
|
+
/^tbd$/i,
|
|
41
|
+
/^to.*be.*determined/i,
|
|
42
|
+
/^pending$/i,
|
|
43
|
+
/^xxx+$/i,
|
|
44
|
+
/^temp/i,
|
|
45
|
+
// Mock ServiceNow patterns
|
|
46
|
+
/^INC\d{7}000\d+$/, // Sequential incident numbers indicating test data
|
|
47
|
+
/^CHG\d{7}000\d+$/, // Sequential change numbers indicating test data
|
|
48
|
+
/^PRB\d{7}000\d+$/, // Sequential problem numbers indicating test data
|
|
49
|
+
];
|
|
50
|
+
// Suspicious numeric patterns that might indicate generated/mock data
|
|
51
|
+
this.SUSPICIOUS_NUMERIC_PATTERNS = [
|
|
52
|
+
/^123+$/, // 123, 1234, 12345...
|
|
53
|
+
/^999+$/, // 999, 9999, 99999...
|
|
54
|
+
/^111+$/, // 111, 1111, 11111...
|
|
55
|
+
/^000+$/, // 000, 0000, 00000...
|
|
56
|
+
/^(12){2,}$/, // 121212...
|
|
57
|
+
/^(99){2,}$/, // 999999...
|
|
58
|
+
];
|
|
59
|
+
this.logger = new logger_js_1.Logger('AntiMockDataValidator');
|
|
60
|
+
}
|
|
61
|
+
/**
|
|
62
|
+
* Validate that dataset contains only real ServiceNow data
|
|
63
|
+
*/
|
|
64
|
+
validateDataset(data, source = 'unknown') {
|
|
65
|
+
if (!data || data.length === 0) {
|
|
66
|
+
return {
|
|
67
|
+
isValid: false,
|
|
68
|
+
violations: ['Empty dataset - no real data to validate'],
|
|
69
|
+
suspiciousFields: [],
|
|
70
|
+
suspiciousValues: []
|
|
71
|
+
};
|
|
72
|
+
}
|
|
73
|
+
const violations = [];
|
|
74
|
+
const suspiciousFields = [];
|
|
75
|
+
const suspiciousValues = [];
|
|
76
|
+
// Check each record
|
|
77
|
+
data.forEach((record, index) => {
|
|
78
|
+
if (!record || typeof record !== 'object') {
|
|
79
|
+
violations.push(`Record ${index}: Invalid record structure`);
|
|
80
|
+
return;
|
|
81
|
+
}
|
|
82
|
+
// Check each field in the record
|
|
83
|
+
Object.entries(record).forEach(([field, value]) => {
|
|
84
|
+
const fieldViolations = this.validateFieldValue(field, value, source);
|
|
85
|
+
if (fieldViolations.length > 0) {
|
|
86
|
+
violations.push(`Record ${index}, Field '${field}': ${fieldViolations.join(', ')}`);
|
|
87
|
+
if (!suspiciousFields.includes(field)) {
|
|
88
|
+
suspiciousFields.push(field);
|
|
89
|
+
}
|
|
90
|
+
if (!suspiciousValues.includes(value)) {
|
|
91
|
+
suspiciousValues.push(value);
|
|
92
|
+
}
|
|
93
|
+
}
|
|
94
|
+
});
|
|
95
|
+
});
|
|
96
|
+
// Additional dataset-level checks
|
|
97
|
+
const datasetViolations = this.validateDatasetPatterns(data, source);
|
|
98
|
+
violations.push(...datasetViolations);
|
|
99
|
+
return {
|
|
100
|
+
isValid: violations.length === 0,
|
|
101
|
+
violations,
|
|
102
|
+
suspiciousFields,
|
|
103
|
+
suspiciousValues
|
|
104
|
+
};
|
|
105
|
+
}
|
|
106
|
+
/**
|
|
107
|
+
* Validate individual field value
|
|
108
|
+
*/
|
|
109
|
+
validateFieldValue(field, value, source) {
|
|
110
|
+
const violations = [];
|
|
111
|
+
if (value === null || value === undefined) {
|
|
112
|
+
return violations; // Null values are acceptable
|
|
113
|
+
}
|
|
114
|
+
const stringValue = String(value);
|
|
115
|
+
// Check for mock data patterns
|
|
116
|
+
for (const pattern of this.MOCK_DATA_PATTERNS) {
|
|
117
|
+
if (pattern.test(stringValue)) {
|
|
118
|
+
violations.push(`Matches mock data pattern: ${pattern.source}`);
|
|
119
|
+
}
|
|
120
|
+
}
|
|
121
|
+
// Check numeric patterns for suspicious sequences
|
|
122
|
+
if (typeof value === 'number' || /^\d+$/.test(stringValue)) {
|
|
123
|
+
for (const pattern of this.SUSPICIOUS_NUMERIC_PATTERNS) {
|
|
124
|
+
if (pattern.test(stringValue)) {
|
|
125
|
+
violations.push(`Suspicious numeric pattern: ${stringValue}`);
|
|
126
|
+
}
|
|
127
|
+
}
|
|
128
|
+
}
|
|
129
|
+
// Field-specific validation
|
|
130
|
+
if (field.toLowerCase().includes('email') && stringValue.includes('@')) {
|
|
131
|
+
if (/@(test|demo|example|mock|fake)\.(com|org|net)$/i.test(stringValue)) {
|
|
132
|
+
violations.push('Test/demo email domain detected');
|
|
133
|
+
}
|
|
134
|
+
}
|
|
135
|
+
if (field.toLowerCase().includes('name') || field.toLowerCase().includes('user')) {
|
|
136
|
+
if (/^(test|demo|sample|mock|fake|admin|user)\d*$/i.test(stringValue)) {
|
|
137
|
+
violations.push('Generic test/demo name pattern');
|
|
138
|
+
}
|
|
139
|
+
}
|
|
140
|
+
return violations;
|
|
141
|
+
}
|
|
142
|
+
/**
|
|
143
|
+
* Validate patterns across the entire dataset
|
|
144
|
+
*/
|
|
145
|
+
validateDatasetPatterns(data, source) {
|
|
146
|
+
const violations = [];
|
|
147
|
+
// Check for suspiciously uniform data
|
|
148
|
+
if (data.length > 10) {
|
|
149
|
+
const firstRecord = data[0];
|
|
150
|
+
const identicalCount = data.filter(record => JSON.stringify(record) === JSON.stringify(firstRecord)).length;
|
|
151
|
+
if (identicalCount > data.length * 0.8) {
|
|
152
|
+
violations.push('Dataset appears to have too many identical records (possible mock data)');
|
|
153
|
+
}
|
|
154
|
+
}
|
|
155
|
+
// Check for sequential IDs indicating generated data
|
|
156
|
+
const sysIds = data.map(record => record.sys_id).filter(id => id);
|
|
157
|
+
if (sysIds.length > 5) {
|
|
158
|
+
const sequentialCount = this.countSequentialIds(sysIds);
|
|
159
|
+
if (sequentialCount > sysIds.length * 0.7) {
|
|
160
|
+
violations.push('Too many sequential sys_id values (indicates generated test data)');
|
|
161
|
+
}
|
|
162
|
+
}
|
|
163
|
+
// Check creation dates for suspicious patterns
|
|
164
|
+
const createdDates = data.map(record => record.sys_created_on).filter(date => date);
|
|
165
|
+
if (createdDates.length > 5) {
|
|
166
|
+
const simultaneousCreations = this.countSimultaneousCreations(createdDates);
|
|
167
|
+
if (simultaneousCreations > createdDates.length * 0.8) {
|
|
168
|
+
violations.push('Too many records created simultaneously (indicates bulk test data creation)');
|
|
169
|
+
}
|
|
170
|
+
}
|
|
171
|
+
return violations;
|
|
172
|
+
}
|
|
173
|
+
/**
|
|
174
|
+
* Count sequential sys_id patterns
|
|
175
|
+
*/
|
|
176
|
+
countSequentialIds(sysIds) {
|
|
177
|
+
let sequentialCount = 0;
|
|
178
|
+
const sortedIds = sysIds.sort();
|
|
179
|
+
for (let i = 1; i < sortedIds.length; i++) {
|
|
180
|
+
const current = sortedIds[i];
|
|
181
|
+
const previous = sortedIds[i - 1];
|
|
182
|
+
// Check if IDs follow a sequential pattern
|
|
183
|
+
if (this.areIdsSequential(previous, current)) {
|
|
184
|
+
sequentialCount++;
|
|
185
|
+
}
|
|
186
|
+
}
|
|
187
|
+
return sequentialCount;
|
|
188
|
+
}
|
|
189
|
+
/**
|
|
190
|
+
* Check if two sys_ids are sequential
|
|
191
|
+
*/
|
|
192
|
+
areIdsSequential(id1, id2) {
|
|
193
|
+
if (id1.length !== id2.length)
|
|
194
|
+
return false;
|
|
195
|
+
if (id1.length !== 32)
|
|
196
|
+
return false; // ServiceNow sys_ids are 32 chars
|
|
197
|
+
// Convert hex to numbers and check if they're sequential
|
|
198
|
+
try {
|
|
199
|
+
const num1 = parseInt(id1.slice(-8), 16);
|
|
200
|
+
const num2 = parseInt(id2.slice(-8), 16);
|
|
201
|
+
return Math.abs(num2 - num1) === 1;
|
|
202
|
+
}
|
|
203
|
+
catch {
|
|
204
|
+
return false;
|
|
205
|
+
}
|
|
206
|
+
}
|
|
207
|
+
/**
|
|
208
|
+
* Count records created at exactly the same time
|
|
209
|
+
*/
|
|
210
|
+
countSimultaneousCreations(dates) {
|
|
211
|
+
const dateMap = new Map();
|
|
212
|
+
dates.forEach(date => {
|
|
213
|
+
const normalizedDate = new Date(date).toISOString();
|
|
214
|
+
dateMap.set(normalizedDate, (dateMap.get(normalizedDate) || 0) + 1);
|
|
215
|
+
});
|
|
216
|
+
let simultaneousCount = 0;
|
|
217
|
+
dateMap.forEach(count => {
|
|
218
|
+
if (count > 1) {
|
|
219
|
+
simultaneousCount += count;
|
|
220
|
+
}
|
|
221
|
+
});
|
|
222
|
+
return simultaneousCount;
|
|
223
|
+
}
|
|
224
|
+
/**
|
|
225
|
+
* Perform comprehensive data integrity check
|
|
226
|
+
*/
|
|
227
|
+
performDataIntegrityCheck(data, source = 'unknown') {
|
|
228
|
+
const validation = this.validateDataset(data, source);
|
|
229
|
+
let qualityScore = 100;
|
|
230
|
+
// Deduct points for violations
|
|
231
|
+
qualityScore -= validation.violations.length * 10;
|
|
232
|
+
qualityScore -= validation.suspiciousFields.length * 5;
|
|
233
|
+
qualityScore -= validation.suspiciousValues.length * 2;
|
|
234
|
+
// Ensure score doesn't go below 0
|
|
235
|
+
qualityScore = Math.max(0, qualityScore);
|
|
236
|
+
return {
|
|
237
|
+
hasRealData: validation.isValid && qualityScore > 70,
|
|
238
|
+
dataQualityScore: qualityScore,
|
|
239
|
+
mockDataDetected: !validation.isValid,
|
|
240
|
+
details: [
|
|
241
|
+
`Validation result: ${validation.isValid ? 'PASSED' : 'FAILED'}`,
|
|
242
|
+
`Total violations: ${validation.violations.length}`,
|
|
243
|
+
`Suspicious fields: ${validation.suspiciousFields.length}`,
|
|
244
|
+
`Data quality score: ${qualityScore}/100`,
|
|
245
|
+
`Source: ${source}`,
|
|
246
|
+
...validation.violations.slice(0, 5) // Show first 5 violations
|
|
247
|
+
]
|
|
248
|
+
};
|
|
249
|
+
}
|
|
250
|
+
/**
|
|
251
|
+
* Enforce zero tolerance policy for mock data
|
|
252
|
+
*/
|
|
253
|
+
enforceZeroTolerancePolicy(data, source = 'unknown') {
|
|
254
|
+
const validation = this.validateDataset(data, source);
|
|
255
|
+
if (!validation.isValid) {
|
|
256
|
+
const errorMessage = [
|
|
257
|
+
'🚨 MOCK DATA DETECTED - ZERO TOLERANCE POLICY VIOLATED!',
|
|
258
|
+
`Source: ${source}`,
|
|
259
|
+
`Violations found: ${validation.violations.length}`,
|
|
260
|
+
'',
|
|
261
|
+
'Violations:',
|
|
262
|
+
...validation.violations.slice(0, 10),
|
|
263
|
+
'',
|
|
264
|
+
'❌ This operation has been BLOCKED.',
|
|
265
|
+
'✅ Only REAL ServiceNow data is allowed.',
|
|
266
|
+
'',
|
|
267
|
+
'Please verify your data source and try again with actual ServiceNow records.'
|
|
268
|
+
].join('\n');
|
|
269
|
+
this.logger.error(errorMessage);
|
|
270
|
+
throw new Error(`Mock data detected in ${source}. Only real ServiceNow data allowed.`);
|
|
271
|
+
}
|
|
272
|
+
this.logger.info(`✅ Data validation passed for ${source} - ${data.length} real records confirmed`);
|
|
273
|
+
}
|
|
274
|
+
/**
|
|
275
|
+
* Generate validation report
|
|
276
|
+
*/
|
|
277
|
+
generateValidationReport(data, source = 'unknown') {
|
|
278
|
+
const integrityCheck = this.performDataIntegrityCheck(data, source);
|
|
279
|
+
return [
|
|
280
|
+
'🔥 ANTI-MOCK DATA VALIDATION REPORT',
|
|
281
|
+
'='.repeat(50),
|
|
282
|
+
`📊 Source: ${source}`,
|
|
283
|
+
`📈 Records Analyzed: ${data.length}`,
|
|
284
|
+
`🎯 Data Quality Score: ${integrityCheck.dataQualityScore}/100`,
|
|
285
|
+
`✅ Real Data Status: ${integrityCheck.hasRealData ? 'CONFIRMED' : 'SUSPICIOUS'}`,
|
|
286
|
+
`🚨 Mock Data Detected: ${integrityCheck.mockDataDetected ? 'YES - BLOCKED' : 'NO - SAFE'}`,
|
|
287
|
+
'',
|
|
288
|
+
'📝 Details:',
|
|
289
|
+
...integrityCheck.details.map(detail => ` - ${detail}`),
|
|
290
|
+
'',
|
|
291
|
+
integrityCheck.hasRealData
|
|
292
|
+
? '🎉 VALIDATION PASSED - Real ServiceNow data confirmed!'
|
|
293
|
+
: '❌ VALIDATION FAILED - Suspicious data patterns detected!',
|
|
294
|
+
'',
|
|
295
|
+
'🔐 Zero Mock Data Policy: ENFORCED',
|
|
296
|
+
'📋 Only 100% real ServiceNow data allowed'
|
|
297
|
+
].join('\n');
|
|
298
|
+
}
|
|
299
|
+
}
|
|
300
|
+
exports.AntiMockDataValidator = AntiMockDataValidator;
|
|
301
|
+
// Export singleton instance
|
|
302
|
+
exports.antiMockValidator = new AntiMockDataValidator();
|
|
303
|
+
// Export validation utilities for use in MCP servers
|
|
304
|
+
const validateRealData = (data, source = 'MCP Operation') => {
|
|
305
|
+
return exports.antiMockValidator.enforceZeroTolerancePolicy(data, source);
|
|
306
|
+
};
|
|
307
|
+
exports.validateRealData = validateRealData;
|
|
308
|
+
const checkDataIntegrity = (data, source = 'MCP Operation') => {
|
|
309
|
+
return exports.antiMockValidator.performDataIntegrityCheck(data, source);
|
|
310
|
+
};
|
|
311
|
+
exports.checkDataIntegrity = checkDataIntegrity;
|
|
312
|
+
const generateDataReport = (data, source = 'MCP Operation') => {
|
|
313
|
+
return exports.antiMockValidator.generateValidationReport(data, source);
|
|
314
|
+
};
|
|
315
|
+
exports.generateDataReport = generateDataReport;
|
|
316
|
+
//# sourceMappingURL=anti-mock-data-validator.js.map
|
|
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
|
|
|
1
|
+
/**
|
|
2
|
+
* ServiceNow Eventual Consistency Handler
|
|
3
|
+
*
|
|
4
|
+
* ServiceNow uses a distributed database architecture with eventual consistency:
|
|
5
|
+
* - Write operations go to primary database (immediate)
|
|
6
|
+
* - Read operations may use read replicas (1-3 second lag)
|
|
7
|
+
* - This causes race conditions in deployment verification
|
|
8
|
+
*/
|
|
9
|
+
import { ServiceNowClient } from './servicenow-client.js';
|
|
10
|
+
export interface RetryConfig {
|
|
11
|
+
maxRetries?: number;
|
|
12
|
+
baseDelay?: number;
|
|
13
|
+
maxDelay?: number;
|
|
14
|
+
backoffMultiplier?: number;
|
|
15
|
+
}
|
|
16
|
+
export interface VerificationResult {
|
|
17
|
+
success: boolean;
|
|
18
|
+
attempts: number;
|
|
19
|
+
finalAttemptError?: any;
|
|
20
|
+
isLikelyTimingIssue: boolean;
|
|
21
|
+
}
|
|
22
|
+
export declare class ServiceNowEventualConsistency {
|
|
23
|
+
private logger;
|
|
24
|
+
constructor(loggerName?: string);
|
|
25
|
+
/**
|
|
26
|
+
* Retry a ServiceNow operation with exponential backoff
|
|
27
|
+
* Designed specifically for post-deployment verification
|
|
28
|
+
*/
|
|
29
|
+
retryWithBackoff<T>(operation: () => Promise<T>, config?: RetryConfig): Promise<{
|
|
30
|
+
result: T | null;
|
|
31
|
+
success: boolean;
|
|
32
|
+
attempts: number;
|
|
33
|
+
}>;
|
|
34
|
+
/**
|
|
35
|
+
* Verify a ServiceNow record exists with retry logic
|
|
36
|
+
*/
|
|
37
|
+
verifyRecordExists(client: ServiceNowClient, table: string, sys_id: string, config?: RetryConfig): Promise<VerificationResult>;
|
|
38
|
+
/**
|
|
39
|
+
* Verify multiple records exist (batch verification)
|
|
40
|
+
*/
|
|
41
|
+
verifyMultipleRecords(client: ServiceNowClient, verifications: Array<{
|
|
42
|
+
table: string;
|
|
43
|
+
sys_id: string;
|
|
44
|
+
name?: string;
|
|
45
|
+
}>, config?: RetryConfig): Promise<Array<VerificationResult & {
|
|
46
|
+
table: string;
|
|
47
|
+
sys_id: string;
|
|
48
|
+
name?: string;
|
|
49
|
+
}>>;
|
|
50
|
+
/**
|
|
51
|
+
* Execute operation with eventual consistency retry
|
|
52
|
+
* Generic wrapper for any ServiceNow operation that might fail due to timing
|
|
53
|
+
*/
|
|
54
|
+
executeWithRetry<T>(operationName: string, operation: () => Promise<T>, validator: (result: T) => boolean, config?: RetryConfig): Promise<{
|
|
55
|
+
result: T | null;
|
|
56
|
+
success: boolean;
|
|
57
|
+
metadata: any;
|
|
58
|
+
}>;
|
|
59
|
+
/**
|
|
60
|
+
* Sleep utility
|
|
61
|
+
*/
|
|
62
|
+
private sleep;
|
|
63
|
+
/**
|
|
64
|
+
* Determine if an error indicates a permanent failure vs timing issue
|
|
65
|
+
*/
|
|
66
|
+
private isPermanentError;
|
|
67
|
+
/**
|
|
68
|
+
* Get user-friendly error description
|
|
69
|
+
*/
|
|
70
|
+
private getErrorDescription;
|
|
71
|
+
/**
|
|
72
|
+
* Assess if failure is likely due to timing issues
|
|
73
|
+
*/
|
|
74
|
+
private assessIfTimingIssue;
|
|
75
|
+
/**
|
|
76
|
+
* Create a pre-configured instance for widget deployments
|
|
77
|
+
*/
|
|
78
|
+
static createForWidgets(): ServiceNowEventualConsistency;
|
|
79
|
+
/**
|
|
80
|
+
* Create a pre-configured instance for flow deployments
|
|
81
|
+
*/
|
|
82
|
+
static createForFlows(): ServiceNowEventualConsistency;
|
|
83
|
+
/**
|
|
84
|
+
* Create a pre-configured instance for application deployments
|
|
85
|
+
*/
|
|
86
|
+
static createForApplications(): ServiceNowEventualConsistency;
|
|
87
|
+
}
|
|
88
|
+
/**
|
|
89
|
+
* Default configuration for different deployment types
|
|
90
|
+
*/
|
|
91
|
+
export declare const CONSISTENCY_CONFIGS: {
|
|
92
|
+
WIDGET: {
|
|
93
|
+
maxRetries: number;
|
|
94
|
+
baseDelay: number;
|
|
95
|
+
maxDelay: number;
|
|
96
|
+
backoffMultiplier: number;
|
|
97
|
+
};
|
|
98
|
+
FLOW: {
|
|
99
|
+
maxRetries: number;
|
|
100
|
+
baseDelay: number;
|
|
101
|
+
maxDelay: number;
|
|
102
|
+
backoffMultiplier: number;
|
|
103
|
+
};
|
|
104
|
+
APPLICATION: {
|
|
105
|
+
maxRetries: number;
|
|
106
|
+
baseDelay: number;
|
|
107
|
+
maxDelay: number;
|
|
108
|
+
backoffMultiplier: number;
|
|
109
|
+
};
|
|
110
|
+
BATCH: {
|
|
111
|
+
maxRetries: number;
|
|
112
|
+
baseDelay: number;
|
|
113
|
+
maxDelay: number;
|
|
114
|
+
backoffMultiplier: number;
|
|
115
|
+
};
|
|
116
|
+
};
|
|
117
|
+
export declare const widgetConsistency: ServiceNowEventualConsistency;
|
|
118
|
+
export declare const flowConsistency: ServiceNowEventualConsistency;
|
|
119
|
+
export declare const appConsistency: ServiceNowEventualConsistency;
|
|
120
|
+
//# sourceMappingURL=servicenow-eventual-consistency.d.ts.map
|