snow-flow 3.0.10 → 3.0.13

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ exports.widgetDeployment = exports.WidgetDeploymentService = void 0;
9
9
  const servicenow_client_js_1 = require("../utils/servicenow-client.js");
10
10
  const logger_js_1 = require("../utils/logger.js");
11
11
  const unified_auth_store_js_1 = require("../utils/unified-auth-store.js");
12
+ const servicenow_eventual_consistency_js_1 = require("../utils/servicenow-eventual-consistency.js");
12
13
  class WidgetDeploymentService {
13
14
  constructor() {
14
15
  this.client = null;
@@ -68,8 +69,13 @@ class WidgetDeploymentService {
68
69
  const result = await this.createWidget(client, widgetData);
69
70
  sys_id = result.sys_id;
70
71
  }
71
- // Verify deployment
72
+ // Verify deployment with eventual consistency handling
72
73
  const verified = await this.verifyDeployment(client, sys_id);
74
+ // Log verification result with context
75
+ if (!verified) {
76
+ this.logger.warn(`⚠️ Verification returned false - this may be a ServiceNow timing issue`);
77
+ this.logger.info(`🔗 Direct verification link: https://${client.instance || 'instance'}.service-now.com/sp_widget.do?sys_id=${sys_id}`);
78
+ }
73
79
  // Get widget details for response
74
80
  const widgetDetails = await this.getWidgetDetails(client, sys_id);
75
81
  return {
@@ -78,8 +84,8 @@ class WidgetDeploymentService {
78
84
  portalUrl: this.buildPortalUrl(client, sys_id),
79
85
  apiEndpoint: this.buildApiEndpoint(client, sys_id),
80
86
  message: isUpdate
81
- ? `Widget '${config.name}' updated successfully`
82
- : `Widget '${config.name}' created successfully`,
87
+ ? `Widget '${config.name}' updated successfully${!verified ? ' (verification pending - check ServiceNow directly)' : ''}`
88
+ : `Widget '${config.name}' created successfully${!verified ? ' (verification pending - check ServiceNow directly)' : ''}`,
83
89
  verificationStatus: verified ? 'verified' : 'unverified'
84
90
  };
85
91
  }
@@ -150,22 +156,17 @@ class WidgetDeploymentService {
150
156
  await client.updateRecord('sp_widget', sys_id, widgetData);
151
157
  }
152
158
  /**
153
- * Verify widget deployment
159
+ * Verify widget deployment with retry logic for eventual consistency
160
+ * ServiceNow has database replication lag of 1-3 seconds
154
161
  */
155
162
  async verifyDeployment(client, sys_id) {
156
- try {
157
- const response = await client.getRecord('sp_widget', sys_id);
158
- if (response && response.sys_id === sys_id) {
159
- this.logger.info(`✅ Widget deployment verified: ${sys_id}`);
160
- return true;
161
- }
162
- this.logger.warn('Widget verification failed - sys_id mismatch');
163
- return false;
164
- }
165
- catch (error) {
166
- this.logger.error('Widget verification failed:', error);
167
- return false;
163
+ const result = await servicenow_eventual_consistency_js_1.widgetConsistency.verifyRecordExists(client, 'sp_widget', sys_id, servicenow_eventual_consistency_js_1.CONSISTENCY_CONFIGS.WIDGET);
164
+ if (!result.success && result.isLikelyTimingIssue) {
165
+ this.logger.warn(`⚠️ Widget verification failed after ${result.attempts} attempts`);
166
+ this.logger.warn(`⚠️ This appears to be a ServiceNow timing issue, not a deployment failure`);
167
+ this.logger.info(`🔗 Check directly: https://${client.instance}/sp_widget.do?sys_id=${sys_id}`);
168
168
  }
169
+ return result.success;
169
170
  }
170
171
  /**
171
172
  * Get widget details
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
1
+ /**
2
+ * Anti-Mock Data Validator
3
+ *
4
+ * This utility ensures NO mock, demo, sample, or fake data is ever used in any MCP tools.
5
+ * All data must come from real ServiceNow instances.
6
+ */
7
+ interface ValidationResult {
8
+ isValid: boolean;
9
+ violations: string[];
10
+ suspiciousFields: string[];
11
+ suspiciousValues: any[];
12
+ }
13
+ interface DataIntegrityCheck {
14
+ hasRealData: boolean;
15
+ dataQualityScore: number;
16
+ mockDataDetected: boolean;
17
+ details: string[];
18
+ }
19
+ export declare class AntiMockDataValidator {
20
+ private logger;
21
+ private readonly MOCK_DATA_PATTERNS;
22
+ private readonly SUSPICIOUS_NUMERIC_PATTERNS;
23
+ constructor();
24
+ /**
25
+ * Validate that dataset contains only real ServiceNow data
26
+ */
27
+ validateDataset(data: any[], source?: string): ValidationResult;
28
+ /**
29
+ * Validate individual field value
30
+ */
31
+ private validateFieldValue;
32
+ /**
33
+ * Validate patterns across the entire dataset
34
+ */
35
+ private validateDatasetPatterns;
36
+ /**
37
+ * Count sequential sys_id patterns
38
+ */
39
+ private countSequentialIds;
40
+ /**
41
+ * Check if two sys_ids are sequential
42
+ */
43
+ private areIdsSequential;
44
+ /**
45
+ * Count records created at exactly the same time
46
+ */
47
+ private countSimultaneousCreations;
48
+ /**
49
+ * Perform comprehensive data integrity check
50
+ */
51
+ performDataIntegrityCheck(data: any[], source?: string): DataIntegrityCheck;
52
+ /**
53
+ * Enforce zero tolerance policy for mock data
54
+ */
55
+ enforceZeroTolerancePolicy(data: any[], source?: string): void;
56
+ /**
57
+ * Generate validation report
58
+ */
59
+ generateValidationReport(data: any[], source?: string): string;
60
+ }
61
+ export declare const antiMockValidator: AntiMockDataValidator;
62
+ export declare const validateRealData: (data: any[], source?: string) => void;
63
+ export declare const checkDataIntegrity: (data: any[], source?: string) => DataIntegrityCheck;
64
+ export declare const generateDataReport: (data: any[], source?: string) => string;
65
+ export {};
66
+ //# sourceMappingURL=anti-mock-data-validator.d.ts.map
@@ -0,0 +1,316 @@
1
+ "use strict";
2
+ /**
3
+ * Anti-Mock Data Validator
4
+ *
5
+ * This utility ensures NO mock, demo, sample, or fake data is ever used in any MCP tools.
6
+ * All data must come from real ServiceNow instances.
7
+ */
8
+ Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", { value: true });
9
+ exports.generateDataReport = exports.checkDataIntegrity = exports.validateRealData = exports.antiMockValidator = exports.AntiMockDataValidator = void 0;
10
+ const logger_js_1 = require("./logger.js");
11
+ class AntiMockDataValidator {
12
+ constructor() {
13
+ // Patterns that indicate mock/demo/test data
14
+ this.MOCK_DATA_PATTERNS = [
15
+ // Explicit mock indicators
16
+ /\bmock\b/i,
17
+ /\bdemo\b/i,
18
+ /\bsample\b/i,
19
+ /\btest\b/i,
20
+ /\bfake\b/i,
21
+ /\bplaceholder\b/i,
22
+ /\bdummy\b/i,
23
+ /\bexample\b/i,
24
+ // Common test values
25
+ /^test$/i,
26
+ /^demo$/i,
27
+ /test.*user/i,
28
+ /demo.*user/i,
29
+ /sample.*data/i,
30
+ /example.*com/i,
31
+ /test@test\.com/i,
32
+ /demo@demo\.com/i,
33
+ // Sequential test patterns
34
+ /test\d+/i,
35
+ /demo\d+/i,
36
+ /user\d+$/i,
37
+ /item\d+$/i,
38
+ // Placeholder values
39
+ /^n\/a$/i,
40
+ /^tbd$/i,
41
+ /^to.*be.*determined/i,
42
+ /^pending$/i,
43
+ /^xxx+$/i,
44
+ /^temp/i,
45
+ // Mock ServiceNow patterns
46
+ /^INC\d{7}000\d+$/, // Sequential incident numbers indicating test data
47
+ /^CHG\d{7}000\d+$/, // Sequential change numbers indicating test data
48
+ /^PRB\d{7}000\d+$/, // Sequential problem numbers indicating test data
49
+ ];
50
+ // Suspicious numeric patterns that might indicate generated/mock data
51
+ this.SUSPICIOUS_NUMERIC_PATTERNS = [
52
+ /^123+$/, // 123, 1234, 12345...
53
+ /^999+$/, // 999, 9999, 99999...
54
+ /^111+$/, // 111, 1111, 11111...
55
+ /^000+$/, // 000, 0000, 00000...
56
+ /^(12){2,}$/, // 121212...
57
+ /^(99){2,}$/, // 999999...
58
+ ];
59
+ this.logger = new logger_js_1.Logger('AntiMockDataValidator');
60
+ }
61
+ /**
62
+ * Validate that dataset contains only real ServiceNow data
63
+ */
64
+ validateDataset(data, source = 'unknown') {
65
+ if (!data || data.length === 0) {
66
+ return {
67
+ isValid: false,
68
+ violations: ['Empty dataset - no real data to validate'],
69
+ suspiciousFields: [],
70
+ suspiciousValues: []
71
+ };
72
+ }
73
+ const violations = [];
74
+ const suspiciousFields = [];
75
+ const suspiciousValues = [];
76
+ // Check each record
77
+ data.forEach((record, index) => {
78
+ if (!record || typeof record !== 'object') {
79
+ violations.push(`Record ${index}: Invalid record structure`);
80
+ return;
81
+ }
82
+ // Check each field in the record
83
+ Object.entries(record).forEach(([field, value]) => {
84
+ const fieldViolations = this.validateFieldValue(field, value, source);
85
+ if (fieldViolations.length > 0) {
86
+ violations.push(`Record ${index}, Field '${field}': ${fieldViolations.join(', ')}`);
87
+ if (!suspiciousFields.includes(field)) {
88
+ suspiciousFields.push(field);
89
+ }
90
+ if (!suspiciousValues.includes(value)) {
91
+ suspiciousValues.push(value);
92
+ }
93
+ }
94
+ });
95
+ });
96
+ // Additional dataset-level checks
97
+ const datasetViolations = this.validateDatasetPatterns(data, source);
98
+ violations.push(...datasetViolations);
99
+ return {
100
+ isValid: violations.length === 0,
101
+ violations,
102
+ suspiciousFields,
103
+ suspiciousValues
104
+ };
105
+ }
106
+ /**
107
+ * Validate individual field value
108
+ */
109
+ validateFieldValue(field, value, source) {
110
+ const violations = [];
111
+ if (value === null || value === undefined) {
112
+ return violations; // Null values are acceptable
113
+ }
114
+ const stringValue = String(value);
115
+ // Check for mock data patterns
116
+ for (const pattern of this.MOCK_DATA_PATTERNS) {
117
+ if (pattern.test(stringValue)) {
118
+ violations.push(`Matches mock data pattern: ${pattern.source}`);
119
+ }
120
+ }
121
+ // Check numeric patterns for suspicious sequences
122
+ if (typeof value === 'number' || /^\d+$/.test(stringValue)) {
123
+ for (const pattern of this.SUSPICIOUS_NUMERIC_PATTERNS) {
124
+ if (pattern.test(stringValue)) {
125
+ violations.push(`Suspicious numeric pattern: ${stringValue}`);
126
+ }
127
+ }
128
+ }
129
+ // Field-specific validation
130
+ if (field.toLowerCase().includes('email') && stringValue.includes('@')) {
131
+ if (/@(test|demo|example|mock|fake)\.(com|org|net)$/i.test(stringValue)) {
132
+ violations.push('Test/demo email domain detected');
133
+ }
134
+ }
135
+ if (field.toLowerCase().includes('name') || field.toLowerCase().includes('user')) {
136
+ if (/^(test|demo|sample|mock|fake|admin|user)\d*$/i.test(stringValue)) {
137
+ violations.push('Generic test/demo name pattern');
138
+ }
139
+ }
140
+ return violations;
141
+ }
142
+ /**
143
+ * Validate patterns across the entire dataset
144
+ */
145
+ validateDatasetPatterns(data, source) {
146
+ const violations = [];
147
+ // Check for suspiciously uniform data
148
+ if (data.length > 10) {
149
+ const firstRecord = data[0];
150
+ const identicalCount = data.filter(record => JSON.stringify(record) === JSON.stringify(firstRecord)).length;
151
+ if (identicalCount > data.length * 0.8) {
152
+ violations.push('Dataset appears to have too many identical records (possible mock data)');
153
+ }
154
+ }
155
+ // Check for sequential IDs indicating generated data
156
+ const sysIds = data.map(record => record.sys_id).filter(id => id);
157
+ if (sysIds.length > 5) {
158
+ const sequentialCount = this.countSequentialIds(sysIds);
159
+ if (sequentialCount > sysIds.length * 0.7) {
160
+ violations.push('Too many sequential sys_id values (indicates generated test data)');
161
+ }
162
+ }
163
+ // Check creation dates for suspicious patterns
164
+ const createdDates = data.map(record => record.sys_created_on).filter(date => date);
165
+ if (createdDates.length > 5) {
166
+ const simultaneousCreations = this.countSimultaneousCreations(createdDates);
167
+ if (simultaneousCreations > createdDates.length * 0.8) {
168
+ violations.push('Too many records created simultaneously (indicates bulk test data creation)');
169
+ }
170
+ }
171
+ return violations;
172
+ }
173
+ /**
174
+ * Count sequential sys_id patterns
175
+ */
176
+ countSequentialIds(sysIds) {
177
+ let sequentialCount = 0;
178
+ const sortedIds = sysIds.sort();
179
+ for (let i = 1; i < sortedIds.length; i++) {
180
+ const current = sortedIds[i];
181
+ const previous = sortedIds[i - 1];
182
+ // Check if IDs follow a sequential pattern
183
+ if (this.areIdsSequential(previous, current)) {
184
+ sequentialCount++;
185
+ }
186
+ }
187
+ return sequentialCount;
188
+ }
189
+ /**
190
+ * Check if two sys_ids are sequential
191
+ */
192
+ areIdsSequential(id1, id2) {
193
+ if (id1.length !== id2.length)
194
+ return false;
195
+ if (id1.length !== 32)
196
+ return false; // ServiceNow sys_ids are 32 chars
197
+ // Convert hex to numbers and check if they're sequential
198
+ try {
199
+ const num1 = parseInt(id1.slice(-8), 16);
200
+ const num2 = parseInt(id2.slice(-8), 16);
201
+ return Math.abs(num2 - num1) === 1;
202
+ }
203
+ catch {
204
+ return false;
205
+ }
206
+ }
207
+ /**
208
+ * Count records created at exactly the same time
209
+ */
210
+ countSimultaneousCreations(dates) {
211
+ const dateMap = new Map();
212
+ dates.forEach(date => {
213
+ const normalizedDate = new Date(date).toISOString();
214
+ dateMap.set(normalizedDate, (dateMap.get(normalizedDate) || 0) + 1);
215
+ });
216
+ let simultaneousCount = 0;
217
+ dateMap.forEach(count => {
218
+ if (count > 1) {
219
+ simultaneousCount += count;
220
+ }
221
+ });
222
+ return simultaneousCount;
223
+ }
224
+ /**
225
+ * Perform comprehensive data integrity check
226
+ */
227
+ performDataIntegrityCheck(data, source = 'unknown') {
228
+ const validation = this.validateDataset(data, source);
229
+ let qualityScore = 100;
230
+ // Deduct points for violations
231
+ qualityScore -= validation.violations.length * 10;
232
+ qualityScore -= validation.suspiciousFields.length * 5;
233
+ qualityScore -= validation.suspiciousValues.length * 2;
234
+ // Ensure score doesn't go below 0
235
+ qualityScore = Math.max(0, qualityScore);
236
+ return {
237
+ hasRealData: validation.isValid && qualityScore > 70,
238
+ dataQualityScore: qualityScore,
239
+ mockDataDetected: !validation.isValid,
240
+ details: [
241
+ `Validation result: ${validation.isValid ? 'PASSED' : 'FAILED'}`,
242
+ `Total violations: ${validation.violations.length}`,
243
+ `Suspicious fields: ${validation.suspiciousFields.length}`,
244
+ `Data quality score: ${qualityScore}/100`,
245
+ `Source: ${source}`,
246
+ ...validation.violations.slice(0, 5) // Show first 5 violations
247
+ ]
248
+ };
249
+ }
250
+ /**
251
+ * Enforce zero tolerance policy for mock data
252
+ */
253
+ enforceZeroTolerancePolicy(data, source = 'unknown') {
254
+ const validation = this.validateDataset(data, source);
255
+ if (!validation.isValid) {
256
+ const errorMessage = [
257
+ '🚨 MOCK DATA DETECTED - ZERO TOLERANCE POLICY VIOLATED!',
258
+ `Source: ${source}`,
259
+ `Violations found: ${validation.violations.length}`,
260
+ '',
261
+ 'Violations:',
262
+ ...validation.violations.slice(0, 10),
263
+ '',
264
+ '❌ This operation has been BLOCKED.',
265
+ '✅ Only REAL ServiceNow data is allowed.',
266
+ '',
267
+ 'Please verify your data source and try again with actual ServiceNow records.'
268
+ ].join('\n');
269
+ this.logger.error(errorMessage);
270
+ throw new Error(`Mock data detected in ${source}. Only real ServiceNow data allowed.`);
271
+ }
272
+ this.logger.info(`✅ Data validation passed for ${source} - ${data.length} real records confirmed`);
273
+ }
274
+ /**
275
+ * Generate validation report
276
+ */
277
+ generateValidationReport(data, source = 'unknown') {
278
+ const integrityCheck = this.performDataIntegrityCheck(data, source);
279
+ return [
280
+ '🔥 ANTI-MOCK DATA VALIDATION REPORT',
281
+ '='.repeat(50),
282
+ `📊 Source: ${source}`,
283
+ `📈 Records Analyzed: ${data.length}`,
284
+ `🎯 Data Quality Score: ${integrityCheck.dataQualityScore}/100`,
285
+ `✅ Real Data Status: ${integrityCheck.hasRealData ? 'CONFIRMED' : 'SUSPICIOUS'}`,
286
+ `🚨 Mock Data Detected: ${integrityCheck.mockDataDetected ? 'YES - BLOCKED' : 'NO - SAFE'}`,
287
+ '',
288
+ '📝 Details:',
289
+ ...integrityCheck.details.map(detail => ` - ${detail}`),
290
+ '',
291
+ integrityCheck.hasRealData
292
+ ? '🎉 VALIDATION PASSED - Real ServiceNow data confirmed!'
293
+ : '❌ VALIDATION FAILED - Suspicious data patterns detected!',
294
+ '',
295
+ '🔐 Zero Mock Data Policy: ENFORCED',
296
+ '📋 Only 100% real ServiceNow data allowed'
297
+ ].join('\n');
298
+ }
299
+ }
300
+ exports.AntiMockDataValidator = AntiMockDataValidator;
301
+ // Export singleton instance
302
+ exports.antiMockValidator = new AntiMockDataValidator();
303
+ // Export validation utilities for use in MCP servers
304
+ const validateRealData = (data, source = 'MCP Operation') => {
305
+ return exports.antiMockValidator.enforceZeroTolerancePolicy(data, source);
306
+ };
307
+ exports.validateRealData = validateRealData;
308
+ const checkDataIntegrity = (data, source = 'MCP Operation') => {
309
+ return exports.antiMockValidator.performDataIntegrityCheck(data, source);
310
+ };
311
+ exports.checkDataIntegrity = checkDataIntegrity;
312
+ const generateDataReport = (data, source = 'MCP Operation') => {
313
+ return exports.antiMockValidator.generateValidationReport(data, source);
314
+ };
315
+ exports.generateDataReport = generateDataReport;
316
+ //# sourceMappingURL=anti-mock-data-validator.js.map
@@ -0,0 +1,120 @@
1
+ /**
2
+ * ServiceNow Eventual Consistency Handler
3
+ *
4
+ * ServiceNow uses a distributed database architecture with eventual consistency:
5
+ * - Write operations go to primary database (immediate)
6
+ * - Read operations may use read replicas (1-3 second lag)
7
+ * - This causes race conditions in deployment verification
8
+ */
9
+ import { ServiceNowClient } from './servicenow-client.js';
10
+ export interface RetryConfig {
11
+ maxRetries?: number;
12
+ baseDelay?: number;
13
+ maxDelay?: number;
14
+ backoffMultiplier?: number;
15
+ }
16
+ export interface VerificationResult {
17
+ success: boolean;
18
+ attempts: number;
19
+ finalAttemptError?: any;
20
+ isLikelyTimingIssue: boolean;
21
+ }
22
+ export declare class ServiceNowEventualConsistency {
23
+ private logger;
24
+ constructor(loggerName?: string);
25
+ /**
26
+ * Retry a ServiceNow operation with exponential backoff
27
+ * Designed specifically for post-deployment verification
28
+ */
29
+ retryWithBackoff<T>(operation: () => Promise<T>, config?: RetryConfig): Promise<{
30
+ result: T | null;
31
+ success: boolean;
32
+ attempts: number;
33
+ }>;
34
+ /**
35
+ * Verify a ServiceNow record exists with retry logic
36
+ */
37
+ verifyRecordExists(client: ServiceNowClient, table: string, sys_id: string, config?: RetryConfig): Promise<VerificationResult>;
38
+ /**
39
+ * Verify multiple records exist (batch verification)
40
+ */
41
+ verifyMultipleRecords(client: ServiceNowClient, verifications: Array<{
42
+ table: string;
43
+ sys_id: string;
44
+ name?: string;
45
+ }>, config?: RetryConfig): Promise<Array<VerificationResult & {
46
+ table: string;
47
+ sys_id: string;
48
+ name?: string;
49
+ }>>;
50
+ /**
51
+ * Execute operation with eventual consistency retry
52
+ * Generic wrapper for any ServiceNow operation that might fail due to timing
53
+ */
54
+ executeWithRetry<T>(operationName: string, operation: () => Promise<T>, validator: (result: T) => boolean, config?: RetryConfig): Promise<{
55
+ result: T | null;
56
+ success: boolean;
57
+ metadata: any;
58
+ }>;
59
+ /**
60
+ * Sleep utility
61
+ */
62
+ private sleep;
63
+ /**
64
+ * Determine if an error indicates a permanent failure vs timing issue
65
+ */
66
+ private isPermanentError;
67
+ /**
68
+ * Get user-friendly error description
69
+ */
70
+ private getErrorDescription;
71
+ /**
72
+ * Assess if failure is likely due to timing issues
73
+ */
74
+ private assessIfTimingIssue;
75
+ /**
76
+ * Create a pre-configured instance for widget deployments
77
+ */
78
+ static createForWidgets(): ServiceNowEventualConsistency;
79
+ /**
80
+ * Create a pre-configured instance for flow deployments
81
+ */
82
+ static createForFlows(): ServiceNowEventualConsistency;
83
+ /**
84
+ * Create a pre-configured instance for application deployments
85
+ */
86
+ static createForApplications(): ServiceNowEventualConsistency;
87
+ }
88
+ /**
89
+ * Default configuration for different deployment types
90
+ */
91
+ export declare const CONSISTENCY_CONFIGS: {
92
+ WIDGET: {
93
+ maxRetries: number;
94
+ baseDelay: number;
95
+ maxDelay: number;
96
+ backoffMultiplier: number;
97
+ };
98
+ FLOW: {
99
+ maxRetries: number;
100
+ baseDelay: number;
101
+ maxDelay: number;
102
+ backoffMultiplier: number;
103
+ };
104
+ APPLICATION: {
105
+ maxRetries: number;
106
+ baseDelay: number;
107
+ maxDelay: number;
108
+ backoffMultiplier: number;
109
+ };
110
+ BATCH: {
111
+ maxRetries: number;
112
+ baseDelay: number;
113
+ maxDelay: number;
114
+ backoffMultiplier: number;
115
+ };
116
+ };
117
+ export declare const widgetConsistency: ServiceNowEventualConsistency;
118
+ export declare const flowConsistency: ServiceNowEventualConsistency;
119
+ export declare const appConsistency: ServiceNowEventualConsistency;
120
+ //# sourceMappingURL=servicenow-eventual-consistency.d.ts.map