slopbrick 0.31.0 → 0.33.0

package/dist/index.js

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ var VERSION;
 var init_header = __esm({
   "src/types/_header.ts"() {
     "use strict";
-    VERSION = "0.31.0";
+    VERSION = "0.33.0";
   }
 });
 
@@ -36599,6 +36599,24 @@ function parseSource(source, filePath) {
     // sufficient for the v9 calibration goal.
     case "kt":
     case "kts":
+    // v0.32.0: Swift files get the same parseBlankModule path.
+    // All 5 `swift/*` rules (force-unwrap, print-debug, fatal-error-
+    // thrown, implicitly-unwrapped-optional, strong-self-capture)
+    // are regex-based and gate themselves on `/\.swift$/i.test(filePath)`
+    // inside their `analyze()`. Same trade-off as Java/Kotlin.
+    case "swift":
+    // v0.33.0: C++ files get the same parseBlankModule path.
+    // All 5 `cpp/*` rules (using-namespace-std, raw-new-delete,
+    // c-style-cast, printf-debug, magic-numbers) are regex-based
+    // and gate themselves on `/\.c(c|pp|xx)?$|^\.h(pp|xx)?$/i.test(filePath)`
+    // inside their `analyze()`. Same trade-off as Java/Kotlin/Swift.
+    case "cpp":
+    case "cc":
+    case "cxx":
+    case "c":
+    case "h":
+    case "hpp":
+    case "hxx":
       return parseBlankModule(source);
     default:
       return parseWithSwc(source, filePath);
@@ -51616,13 +51634,13 @@ var init_signal_strength = __esm({
         defaultOff: true
       },
       "swift/force-unwrap": {
-        recall: 0,
-        fpRate: 0,
-        ratio: 1,
-        precision: 0,
-        lastCalibratedAt: "2026-07-02T00:00:00Z",
+        recall: 0.10211,
+        fpRate: 0.21462,
+        ratio: 0.48,
+        precision: 0.1721,
+        lastCalibratedAt: "2026-07-03T00:00:00Z",
         verdict: "DORMANT",
-        _calibrationNote: "v0.24: new rule (Swift force-unwrap \u2014 `as!`, `try!`, `var!.prop` in production). DORMANT until v9 Swift corpus calibration.",
+        _calibrationNote: "v0.32: v9 Swift calibration (1300 neg, 568 pos). Per-file unique measurement: 58 TP files, 279 FP files, ratio=0.48. Era-confounded: pre-2022 Swift used ! freely (the only way to unwrap); modern Swift uses guard let / if let / try?. Same direction as kotlin/force-unwrap (0.35) and kotlin/runblocking-misuse (0.50). INSUFFICIENT_DATA: pos arm 568 files (below 10k floor).",
         aiSpecific: true,
         _v7Verdict: "DORMANT",
         _v7Lift: 1,
@@ -51631,16 +51649,21 @@ var init_signal_strength = __esm({
         _v7Precision: 0,
         _v8Verdict: "DORMANT",
         _v8Lift: 1,
+        _v9Verdict: "DORMANT",
+        _v9Lift: 0.48,
+        _v9Recall: 0.10211,
+        _v9FpRate: 0.21462,
+        _v9Precision: 0.1721,
         defaultOff: true
       },
       "swift/print-debug": {
-        recall: 0,
-        fpRate: 0,
-        ratio: 1,
-        precision: 0,
-        lastCalibratedAt: "2026-07-02T00:00:00Z",
-        verdict: "DORMANT",
-        _calibrationNote: "v0.24: new rule (multi-print in Swift source \u2014 use Logger / os.log). DORMANT until v9 Swift corpus calibration.",
+        recall: 0.06866,
+        fpRate: 0.06077,
+        ratio: 1.13,
+        precision: 0.3305,
+        lastCalibratedAt: "2026-07-03T00:00:00Z",
+        verdict: "OK",
+        _calibrationNote: "v0.32: v9 Swift calibration (1300 neg, 568 pos). Per-file unique: 39 TP files, 79 FP files, ratio=1.13 (\u22651.0, OK). Total-fires measurement was ratio=1.78 (1.6x higher) but per-file is more conservative. precision=33.05% (below 50% USEFUL threshold); verdict=OK. The direction is positive: post-2024 Swift (especially AI-generated examples in OpenAI Swift, WhisperKit) uses print() for output; pre-2022 production Swift (Alamofire, Vapor, Moya) uses os.Logger / OSLog. Same direction as kotlin/println-as-log (1.84) and java/system-out-println (1.73 refined, 3.29 unrefined). INSUFFICIENT_DATA: pos arm 568 files (below 10k floor).",
         aiSpecific: true,
         _v7Verdict: "DORMANT",
         _v7Lift: 1,
@@ -51649,16 +51672,21 @@ var init_signal_strength = __esm({
         _v7Precision: 0,
         _v8Verdict: "DORMANT",
         _v8Lift: 1,
+        _v9Verdict: "OK",
+        _v9Lift: 1.13,
+        _v9Recall: 0.06866,
+        _v9FpRate: 0.06077,
+        _v9Precision: 0.3305,
         defaultOff: true
       },
       "swift/fatal-error-thrown": {
-        recall: 0,
-        fpRate: 0,
-        ratio: 1,
-        precision: 0,
-        lastCalibratedAt: "2026-07-02T00:00:00Z",
+        recall: 0.06514,
+        fpRate: 0.11462,
+        ratio: 0.57,
+        precision: 0.1989,
+        lastCalibratedAt: "2026-07-03T00:00:00Z",
         verdict: "DORMANT",
-        _calibrationNote: "v0.24: new rule (`fatalError` / `preconditionFailure` in production Swift \u2014 replaces with typed default). DORMANT until v9 Swift corpus calibration.",
+        _calibrationNote: "v0.32: v9 Swift calibration (1300 neg, 568 pos). Per-file unique: 37 TP files, 149 FP files, ratio=0.57. Era-confounded: pre-2022 Swift used fatalError liberally for unrecoverable states; modern Swift uses typed errors (throws) and Result types. INSUFFICIENT_DATA: pos arm 568 files.",
         aiSpecific: true,
         _v7Verdict: "DORMANT",
         _v7Lift: 1,
@@ -51667,16 +51695,21 @@ var init_signal_strength = __esm({
         _v7Precision: 0,
         _v8Verdict: "DORMANT",
         _v8Lift: 1,
+        _v9Verdict: "DORMANT",
+        _v9Lift: 0.57,
+        _v9Recall: 0.06514,
+        _v9FpRate: 0.11462,
+        _v9Precision: 0.1989,
         defaultOff: true
       },
       "swift/implicitly-unwrapped-optional": {
-        recall: 0,
-        fpRate: 0,
-        ratio: 1,
-        precision: 0,
-        lastCalibratedAt: "2026-07-02T00:00:00Z",
+        recall: 0.01937,
+        fpRate: 0.10692,
+        ratio: 0.18,
+        precision: 0.0733,
+        lastCalibratedAt: "2026-07-03T00:00:00Z",
         verdict: "DORMANT",
-        _calibrationNote: "v0.24: new rule (Swift implicitly unwrapped optional \u2014 declare as Type? and unwrap with guard let). DORMANT until v9 Swift corpus calibration.",
+        _calibrationNote: "v0.32: v9 Swift calibration (1300 neg, 568 pos). Per-file unique: 11 TP files, 139 FP files, ratio=0.18 \u2014 strong era-confound. Pre-2022 Swift used `var foo: Bar!` for IBOutlets and delegates; modern Swift uses `weak var` or declares as `Bar?` and unwraps with guard let. Same magnitude as kotlin/coroutine-global-scope (0.09) \u2014 strongest era-confound in v9 history. INSUFFICIENT_DATA: pos arm 568 files.",
         aiSpecific: true,
         _v7Verdict: "DORMANT",
         _v7Lift: 1,
@@ -51685,16 +51718,21 @@ var init_signal_strength = __esm({
         _v7Precision: 0,
         _v8Verdict: "DORMANT",
         _v8Lift: 1,
+        _v9Verdict: "DORMANT",
+        _v9Lift: 0.18,
+        _v9Recall: 0.01937,
+        _v9FpRate: 0.10692,
+        _v9Precision: 0.0733,
         defaultOff: true
       },
       "swift/strong-self-capture": {
-        recall: 0,
-        fpRate: 0,
-        ratio: 1,
-        precision: 0,
-        lastCalibratedAt: "2026-07-02T00:00:00Z",
+        recall: 0.24824,
+        fpRate: 0.44308,
+        ratio: 0.56,
+        precision: 0.1967,
+        lastCalibratedAt: "2026-07-03T00:00:00Z",
         verdict: "DORMANT",
-        _calibrationNote: "v0.24: new rule (Swift closure captures `self` strongly \u2014 retain cycle. Use [weak self] / [unowned self]). DORMANT until v9 Swift corpus calibration.",
+        _calibrationNote: "v0.32: v9 Swift calibration (1300 neg, 568 pos). Per-file unique: 141 TP files, 576 FP files, ratio=0.56. Era-confounded: pre-2022 Swift closures defaulted to strong self capture; modern Swift (Swift 5.7+) emits a warning for implicit self capture in escaping closures. The rule fires multiple times per file (multiple closures) \u2014 total fires were 2316 TP, 8913 FP, but per-file is 141 TP, 576 FP. INSUFFICIENT_DATA: pos arm 568 files.",
         aiSpecific: true,
         _v7Verdict: "DORMANT",
         _v7Lift: 1,
@@ -51703,16 +51741,21 @@ var init_signal_strength = __esm({
         _v7Precision: 0,
         _v8Verdict: "DORMANT",
         _v8Lift: 1,
+        _v9Verdict: "DORMANT",
+        _v9Lift: 0.56,
+        _v9Recall: 0.24824,
+        _v9FpRate: 0.44308,
+        _v9Precision: 0.1967,
         defaultOff: true
       },
       "cpp/using-namespace-std": {
         recall: 0,
-        fpRate: 0,
-        ratio: 1,
+        fpRate: 2e-4,
+        ratio: 0,
         precision: 0,
-        lastCalibratedAt: "2026-07-02T00:00:00Z",
+        lastCalibratedAt: "2026-07-03T00:00:00Z",
         verdict: "DORMANT",
-        _calibrationNote: "v0.24: new rule (`using namespace std;` in C++ header \u2014 pollutes every consumer). DORMANT until v9 C++ corpus calibration.",
+        _calibrationNote: "v0.33: v9 C++ calibration (5107 neg, 1655 pos). 1 fire total (in neg). Pre-2022 C++ used `using namespace std;` extensively (it's idiomatic in tutorials); modern C++ deprecated it. INSUFFICIENT_DATA: pos arm 1655 files (below 10k floor).",
         aiSpecific: true,
         _v7Verdict: "DORMANT",
         _v7Lift: 1,
@@ -51721,16 +51764,21 @@ var init_signal_strength = __esm({
         _v7Precision: 0,
         _v8Verdict: "DORMANT",
         _v8Lift: 1,
+        _v9Verdict: "DORMANT",
+        _v9Lift: 0,
+        _v9Recall: 0,
+        _v9FpRate: 2e-4,
+        _v9Precision: 0,
         defaultOff: true
       },
       "cpp/raw-new-delete": {
-        recall: 0,
-        fpRate: 0,
-        ratio: 1,
-        precision: 0,
-        lastCalibratedAt: "2026-07-02T00:00:00Z",
+        recall: 967e-5,
+        fpRate: 0.01077,
+        ratio: 0.9,
+        precision: 0.2254,
+        lastCalibratedAt: "2026-07-03T00:00:00Z",
         verdict: "DORMANT",
-        _calibrationNote: "v0.24: new rule (manual `new` / `delete` pairing in C++ \u2014 use std::make_unique / std::unique_ptr). DORMANT until v9 C++ corpus calibration.",
+        _calibrationNote: "v0.33: v9 C++ calibration (5107 neg, 1655 pos). Per-file unique: 16 TP, 55 FP, ratio=0.90. Era-confounded: pre-2022 C++ used raw new/delete extensively; modern C++ uses std::make_unique. INSUFFICIENT_DATA: pos arm 1655 files.",
         aiSpecific: true,
         _v7Verdict: "DORMANT",
         _v7Lift: 1,
@@ -51739,16 +51787,21 @@ var init_signal_strength = __esm({
         _v7Precision: 0,
         _v8Verdict: "DORMANT",
         _v8Lift: 1,
+        _v9Verdict: "DORMANT",
+        _v9Lift: 0.9,
+        _v9Recall: 967e-5,
+        _v9FpRate: 0.01077,
+        _v9Precision: 0.2254,
         defaultOff: true
       },
       "cpp/c-style-cast": {
-        recall: 0,
-        fpRate: 0,
-        ratio: 1,
-        precision: 0,
-        lastCalibratedAt: "2026-07-02T00:00:00Z",
+        recall: 0.5281,
+        fpRate: 0.56491,
+        ratio: 0.93,
+        precision: 0.2325,
+        lastCalibratedAt: "2026-07-03T00:00:00Z",
         verdict: "DORMANT",
-        _calibrationNote: "v0.24: new rule (C-style cast `(int)x` in C++ \u2014 use static_cast / reinterpret_cast / const_cast). DORMANT until v9 C++ corpus calibration.",
+        _calibrationNote: "v0.33: v9 C++ calibration (5107 neg, 1655 pos). Per-file unique: 874 TP, 2885 FP, ratio=0.93. Total fires were 32265 TP, 39954 FP \u2014 the regex is too broad and fires on every C-style cast including static_cast in template code. The per-file measurement (874/1655 = 53%) is more meaningful \u2014 both arms have similar proportions of files using C-style casts. INSUFFICIENT_DATA: pos arm 1655 files.",
         aiSpecific: true,
         _v7Verdict: "DORMANT",
         _v7Lift: 1,
@@ -51757,16 +51810,21 @@ var init_signal_strength = __esm({
         _v7Precision: 0,
         _v8Verdict: "DORMANT",
         _v8Lift: 1,
+        _v9Verdict: "DORMANT",
+        _v9Lift: 0.93,
+        _v9Recall: 0.5281,
+        _v9FpRate: 0.56491,
+        _v9Precision: 0.2325,
         defaultOff: true
       },
       "cpp/printf-debug": {
-        recall: 0,
-        fpRate: 0,
-        ratio: 1,
-        precision: 0,
-        lastCalibratedAt: "2026-07-02T00:00:00Z",
-        verdict: "DORMANT",
-        _calibrationNote: "v0.24: new rule (printf family / std::cout debug printing in C++ \u2014 use spdlog / glog / AbslLog). DORMANT until v9 C++ corpus calibration.",
+        recall: 0.09426,
+        fpRate: 0.03877,
+        ratio: 2.43,
+        precision: 0.4407,
+        lastCalibratedAt: "2026-07-03T00:00:00Z",
+        verdict: "OK",
+        _calibrationNote: "v0.33: v9 C++ calibration (5107 neg, 1655 pos). Per-file unique: 156 TP files, 198 FP files, ratio=2.43 (\u22651.5) \u2014 fourth positive-signal rule in v9 history (and the strongest ratio so far). precision=44.07% (just below 50% USEFUL threshold); verdict=OK. Total fires: 182 TP, 198 FP. The signal is real: post-2024 C++ (mostly AI-generated demos in llama.cpp, whisper.cpp, openai-cpp) uses printf/cout for output; pre-2022 production C++ (folly, protobuf, abseil) uses spdlog / glog / AbslLog. Same direction as kotlin/println-as-log (1.84), java/system-out-println (1.73 refined), swift/print-debug (1.13). INSUFFICIENT_DATA: pos arm 1655 files (below 10k floor).",
         aiSpecific: true,
         _v7Verdict: "DORMANT",
         _v7Lift: 1,
@@ -51775,16 +51833,21 @@ var init_signal_strength = __esm({
         _v7Precision: 0,
         _v8Verdict: "DORMANT",
         _v8Lift: 1,
+        _v9Verdict: "OK",
+        _v9Lift: 2.43,
+        _v9Recall: 0.09426,
+        _v9FpRate: 0.03877,
+        _v9Precision: 0.4407,
         defaultOff: true
       },
       "cpp/magic-numbers": {
-        recall: 0,
-        fpRate: 0,
-        ratio: 1,
-        precision: 0,
-        lastCalibratedAt: "2026-07-02T00:00:00Z",
+        recall: 0.13293,
+        fpRate: 0.15391,
+        ratio: 0.86,
+        precision: 0.2187,
+        lastCalibratedAt: "2026-07-03T00:00:00Z",
         verdict: "DORMANT",
-        _calibrationNote: "v0.24: new rule (magic-number literal in C++ comparison / return \u2014 name it `constexpr int MAX = ...`). DORMANT until v9 C++ corpus calibration.",
+        _calibrationNote: "v0.33: v9 C++ calibration (5107 neg, 1655 pos). Per-file unique: 220 TP, 786 FP, ratio=0.86. Both arms have similar proportions of files with magic numbers \u2014 this is a general C++ anti-pattern that hasn't been eradicated. INSUFFICIENT_DATA: pos arm 1655 files.",
         aiSpecific: true,
         _v7Verdict: "DORMANT",
         _v7Lift: 1,
@@ -51793,6 +51856,11 @@ var init_signal_strength = __esm({
         _v7Precision: 0,
         _v8Verdict: "DORMANT",
         _v8Lift: 1,
+        _v9Verdict: "DORMANT",
+        _v9Lift: 0.86,
+        _v9Recall: 0.13293,
+        _v9FpRate: 0.15391,
+        _v9Precision: 0.2187,
         defaultOff: true
       }
     };
@@ -51876,15 +51944,7 @@ async function scanFile(filePath, config, registry, cwd = process.cwd()) {
   const cache = buildParserCacheConfig(cwd);
   const ext = extname5(filePath).toLowerCase();
   const UNSUPPORTED_LANGS = /* @__PURE__ */ new Set([
-    ".swift",
     ".dart",
-    ".cpp",
-    ".cc",
-    ".cxx",
-    ".c",
-    ".h",
-    ".hpp",
-    ".hxx",
     ".rb",
     ".php"
   ]);

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "slopbrick",
-  "version": "0.31.0",
+  "version": "0.33.0",
   "description": "Discovered, modeled, and governed repository structure. SlopBrick scans source code, classifies it against 95+ rules in 15 categories, computes 4 scores (aiSlopScore: lower=cleaner, engineeringHygiene, security, repositoryHealth composite), and persists the structure for AI agents and CI.",
   "type": "module",
   "bin": {