slopbrick 0.18.1 → 0.18.3

package/dist/index.d.cts

@@ -853,6 +853,23 @@ interface ProjectReport {
     /** Phase 2 §10: ruleId → subscore bucket, used by the composite formula.
      *  Each issue contributes to exactly one bucket. */
     subscores?: Record<string, number>;
+    /** v0.18.2: project-level aggregate of the per-file Bayesian
+     *  composite scores (worker.ts:98 produces them; previously dropped
+     *  on the floor). The mean is the headline "is this codebase AI?"
+     *  signal; max catches the single worst file. Informational, does
+     *  not affect the 4 headline scores (those are deterministic).
+     *
+     *  Kept optional for backward compat with existing fixtures. */
+    compositeScore?: {
+        /** Mean across all files that fired at least one rule. */
+        mean: number;
+        /** Highest per-file probability in the scan. */
+        max: number;
+        /** Confidence tier of the mean (per Jaeschke 1994 JAMA). */
+        tier: 'LIKELY_HUMAN' | 'INCONCLUSIVE' | 'LIKELY_AI' | 'VERY_LIKELY_AI';
+        /** Number of files that contributed a composite score. */
+        fileCount: number;
+    };
     /** Architecture Consistency Score (0-100). 100 = one modal system, one
      * button variant, one api client, one state lib, one fetch lib, no
      * off-scale values. Optional because it requires a deeper scan and

package/dist/index.d.ts

@@ -853,6 +853,23 @@ interface ProjectReport {
     /** Phase 2 §10: ruleId → subscore bucket, used by the composite formula.
      *  Each issue contributes to exactly one bucket. */
     subscores?: Record<string, number>;
+    /** v0.18.2: project-level aggregate of the per-file Bayesian
+     *  composite scores (worker.ts:98 produces them; previously dropped
+     *  on the floor). The mean is the headline "is this codebase AI?"
+     *  signal; max catches the single worst file. Informational, does
+     *  not affect the 4 headline scores (those are deterministic).
+     *
+     *  Kept optional for backward compat with existing fixtures. */
+    compositeScore?: {
+        /** Mean across all files that fired at least one rule. */
+        mean: number;
+        /** Highest per-file probability in the scan. */
+        max: number;
+        /** Confidence tier of the mean (per Jaeschke 1994 JAMA). */
+        tier: 'LIKELY_HUMAN' | 'INCONCLUSIVE' | 'LIKELY_AI' | 'VERY_LIKELY_AI';
+        /** Number of files that contributed a composite score. */
+        fileCount: number;
+    };
     /** Architecture Consistency Score (0-100). 100 = one modal system, one
      * button variant, one api client, one state lib, one fetch lib, no
      * off-scale values. Optional because it requires a deeper scan and