skill-land 1.0.0 → 1.0.1

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (2) hide show
  1. package/README.md +12 -4
  2. package/package.json +1 -1
package/README.md CHANGED
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ npx skill-land Magithar/SKILLmama --for codex,antigravity
8
8
  npx skill-land Magithar/SKILLmama --for codex --verify # audit an existing install
9
9
  ```
10
10
 
11
+ [![npm](https://img.shields.io/npm/v/skill-land)](https://www.npmjs.com/package/skill-land)
12
+
11
13
  ## Why this exists
12
14
 
13
15
  `npx skills add -a <agent> -g` reports success while writing to the wrong directory
@@ -121,10 +123,16 @@ v2.8.1, `--no-llm`):
121
123
  | CAUTION | 9 |
122
124
  | **DO_NOT_INSTALL** | **8 (44%)** |
123
125
 
124
- SKILLmama's own `SKILL.md` scores **100 / CRITICAL / DO_NOT_INSTALL**, because its Phase 3.7
125
- DISCARD rules contain the literal phrase *"instructions to bypass safety checks"* and the pattern
126
- matcher reads that as an anti-refusal attack. A security checklist gets flagged for describing
127
- the attacks it checks for.
126
+ The failure mode is worth understanding, because it is not random. A skill that *documents* attack
127
+ patterns gets flagged for *containing* them: the static matcher has no negation handling, so a rule
128
+ saying "reject skills that bypass safety checks" reads identically to a skill saying "bypass safety
129
+ checks".
130
+
131
+ [SKILLmama](https://github.com/Magithar/SKILLmama) was a worked example. Its security checklist
132
+ scored `CRITICAL` until four DISCARD criteria were reworded to say the same thing in different
133
+ words; it now scores `7 / LOW / SAFE`. Its behaviour never changed, only its vocabulary. Adding an
134
+ explicit user-consent section was also tested and made the score **worse**, because describing a
135
+ safeguard trips the same patterns as describing the danger.
128
136
 
129
137
  A gate that blocks 44% of legitimate skills does not make anyone safer; it teaches people to pass
130
138
  the override flag reflexively. So findings are surfaced with file and line, and the decision stays
package/package.json CHANGED
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
1
1
  {
2
2
  "name": "skill-land",
3
- "version": "1.0.0",
3
+ "version": "1.0.1",
4
4
  "description": "Install an agent skill to the directory the agent actually reads, then verify it landed. Exits non-zero if it didn't.",
5
5
  "keywords": [
6
6
  "agent-skills",