siesa-agents 2.1.78 → 2.1.79

package/bmad/bmb/workflows/agent/steps-c/step-08b-metadata-validation.md

@@ -1,135 +0,0 @@
----
-name: 'step-07b-metadata-validation'
-description: 'Validate agent metadata properties'
-
-# File References
-nextStepFile: './step-08c-persona-validation.md'
-agentMetadata: ../data/agent-metadata.md
-builtYaml: '{bmb_creations_output_folder}/{agent-name}/{agent-name}.agent.yaml'
-
-# Task References
-advancedElicitationTask: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml'
-partyModeWorkflow: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md'
----
-
-# STEP GOAL
-
-Validate that the agent's metadata properties (name, description, version, tags, category, etc.) are properly formatted, complete, and follow BMAD standards.
-
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES
-
-- **NEVER skip validation checks** - All metadata fields must be verified
-- **ALWAYS load both reference documents** - agentMetadata.md AND the builtYaml
-- **NEVER modify files without user approval** - Report findings first, await menu selection
-- **ALWAYS use absolute paths** when referencing files
-- **CRITICAL:** This is a validation step, not an editing step
-
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS
-
-### Protocol 1: Load and Compare
-1. Read the metadata validation reference from `{agentMetadata}`
-2. Read the built agent YAML from `{builtYaml}`
-3. Extract the metadata section from the builtYaml
-4. Compare actual metadata against validation rules
-
-### Protocol 2: Validation Checks
-Perform these checks systematically:
-
-1. **Required Fields Existence**
-   - [ ] name: Present and non-empty
-   - [ ] description: Present and non-empty
-   - [ ] version: Present and follows semantic versioning (X.Y.Z)
-   - [ ] category: Present and matches valid category
-   - [ ] tags: Present as array, not empty
-
-2. **Format Validation**
-   - [ ] name: Uses kebab-case, no spaces
-   - [ ] description: 50-200 characters (unless intentionally brief)
-   - [ ] version: Follows semver pattern (e.g., 1.0.0)
-   - [ ] tags: Array of lowercase strings with hyphens
-   - [ ] category: Matches one of the allowed categories
-
-3. **Content Quality**
-   - [ ] description: Clear and concise, explains what the agent does
-   - [ ] tags: Relevant to agent's purpose (3-7 tags recommended)
-   - [ ] category: Most appropriate classification
-
-4. **Standards Compliance**
-   - [ ] No prohibited characters in fields
-   - [ ] No redundant or conflicting information
-   - [ ] Consistent formatting with other agents
-
-### Protocol 3: Report Findings
-Organize your report into three sections:
-
-**PASSING CHECKS** (List what passed)
-```
-✓ Required fields present
-✓ Version format valid (1.0.0)
-✓ Name follows kebab-case convention
-```
-
-**WARNINGS** (Non-blocking issues)
-```
-⚠ Description is brief (45 chars, recommended 50-200)
-⚠ Only 2 tags provided, 3-7 recommended
-```
-
-**FAILURES** (Blocking issues that must be fixed)
-```
-✗ Missing required field: version
-✗ Invalid version format: "v1.0" (should be "1.0.0")
-✗ Category "custom-type" not in allowed list
-```
-
-### Protocol 4: Menu System
-
-#### 5. Present MENU OPTIONS
-
-Display: "**Select an Option:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [F] Fix Findings [P] Party Mode [C] Continue"
-
-#### Menu Handling Logic:
-
-- IF A: Execute {advancedElicitationTask}, and when finished redisplay the menu
-- IF F: Apply auto-fixes to {builtYaml} for identified issues, then redisplay the menu
-- IF P: Execute {partyModeWorkflow}, and when finished redisplay the menu
-- IF C: Proceed to next validation step, update frontmatter, then only then load, read entire file, then execute {nextStepFile}
-- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options](#5-present-menu-options)
-
-#### EXECUTION RULES:
-
-- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
-- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
-- After other menu items execution, return to this menu
-- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then end with display again of the menu options
-
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES
-
-**IN SCOPE:**
-- Metadata section of agent.yaml (name, description, version, tags, category, author, license, etc.)
-- Referencing the agentMetadata.md validation rules
-- Comparing against BMAD standards
-
-**OUT OF SCOPE:**
-- Persona fields (handled in step-07c)
-- Menu items (handled in step-07d)
-- System architecture (handled in step-07e)
-- Capability implementation (handled in step-07f)
-
-**DO NOT:**
-- Validate persona properties in this step
-- Suggest major feature additions
-- Question the agent's core purpose
-- Modify fields beyond metadata
-
-## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
-
-ONLY WHEN [C continue option] is selected and [validation complete with any findings addressed], will you then load and read fully `{nextStepFile}` to execute and begin [persona validation].
-
-## SUCCESS METRICS
-
-✓ **Complete Success:** All checks pass, no failures, warnings are optional
-✓ **Partial Success:** Failures fixed via [F] option, warnings acknowledged
-✓ **Failure:** Blocking failures remain when user selects [C]
-
-**CRITICAL:** Never proceed to next step if blocking failures exist and user hasn't acknowledged them.

package/bmad/bmb/workflows/agent/steps-c/step-08c-persona-validation.md

@@ -1,161 +0,0 @@
----
-name: 'step-07c-persona-validation'
-description: 'Validate persona fields and principles'
-
-# File References
-nextStepFile: './step-08d-menu-validation.md'
-personaProperties: ../data/persona-properties.md
-principlesCrafting: ../data/principles-crafting.md
-builtYaml: '{bmb_creations_output_folder}/{agent-name}/{agent-name}.agent.yaml'
-
-# Task References
-advancedElicitationTask: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml'
-partyModeWorkflow: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md'
----
-
-# STEP GOAL
-
-Validate that the agent's persona (role, tone, expertise, principles, constraints) is well-defined, consistent, and aligned with its purpose.
-
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES
-
-- **NEVER skip validation checks** - All persona fields must be verified
-- **ALWAYS load both reference documents** - personaProperties.md AND principlesCrafting.md
-- **NEVER modify files without user approval** - Report findings first, await menu selection
-- **ALWAYS use absolute paths** when referencing files
-- **CRITICAL:** This is a validation step, not an editing step
-
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS
-
-### Protocol 1: Load and Compare
-1. Read the persona validation reference from `{personaProperties}`
-2. Read the principles crafting guide from `{principlesCrafting}`
-3. Read the built agent YAML from `{builtYaml}`
-4. Extract the persona section from the builtYaml
-5. Compare actual persona against validation rules
-
-### Protocol 2: Validation Checks
-Perform these checks systematically:
-
-1. **Required Fields Existence**
-   - [ ] role: Present, clear, and specific
-   - [ ] tone: Present and appropriate to role
-   - [ ] expertise: Present and relevant to agent's purpose
-   - [ ] principles: Present as array, not empty (if applicable)
-   - [ ] constraints: Present as array, not empty (if applicable)
-
-2. **Content Quality - Role**
-   - [ ] Role is specific (not generic like "assistant")
-   - [ ] Role aligns with agent's purpose and menu items
-   - [ ] Role is achievable within LLM capabilities
-   - [ ] Role scope is appropriate (not too broad/narrow)
-
-3. **Content Quality - Tone**
-   - [ ] Tone is clearly defined (professional, friendly, authoritative, etc.)
-   - [ ] Tone matches the role and target users
-   - [ ] Tone is consistent throughout the definition
-   - [ ] Tone examples or guidance provided if nuanced
-
-4. **Content Quality - Expertise**
-   - [ ] Expertise areas are relevant to role
-   - [ ] Expertise claims are realistic for LLM
-   - [ ] Expertise domains are specific (not just "knowledgeable")
-   - [ ] Expertise supports the menu capabilities
-
-5. **Content Quality - Principles**
-   - [ ] Principles are actionable (not vague platitudes)
-   - [ ] Principles guide behavior and decisions
-   - [ ] Principles are consistent with role
-   - [ ] 3-7 principles recommended (not overwhelming)
-   - [ ] Each principle is clear and specific
-
-6. **Content Quality - Constraints**
-   - [ ] Constraints define boundaries clearly
-   - [ ] Constraints are enforceable (measurable/observable)
-   - [ ] Constraints prevent undesirable behaviors
-   - [ ] Constraints don't contradict principles
-
-7. **Consistency Checks**
-   - [ ] Role, tone, expertise, principles all align
-   - [ ] No contradictions between principles and constraints
-   - [ ] Persona supports the menu items defined
-   - [ ] Language and terminology consistent
-
-### Protocol 3: Report Findings
-Organize your report into three sections:
-
-**PASSING CHECKS** (List what passed)
-```
-✓ Role is specific and well-defined
-✓ Tone clearly articulated and appropriate
-✓ Expertise aligns with agent purpose
-✓ Principles are actionable and clear
-```
-
-**WARNINGS** (Non-blocking issues)
-```
-⚠ Only 2 principles provided, 3-7 recommended for richer guidance
-⚠ No constraints defined - consider adding boundaries
-⚠ Expertise areas are broad, could be more specific
-```
-
-**FAILURES** (Blocking issues that must be fixed)
-```
-✗ Role is generic ("assistant") - needs specificity
-✗ Tone undefined - creates inconsistent behavior
-✗ Principles are vague ("be helpful" - not actionable)
-✗ Contradiction: Principle says "be creative", constraint says "follow strict rules"
-```
-
-### Protocol 4: Menu System
-
-#### 5. Present MENU OPTIONS
-
-Display: "**Select an Option:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [F] Fix Findings [P] Party Mode [C] Continue"
-
-#### Menu Handling Logic:
-
-- IF A: Execute {advancedElicitationTask}, and when finished redisplay the menu
-- IF F: Apply auto-fixes to {builtYaml} for identified issues, then redisplay the menu
-- IF P: Execute {partyModeWorkflow}, and when finished redisplay the menu
-- IF C: Proceed to next validation step, update frontmatter, then only then load, read entire file, then execute {nextStepFile}
-- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options](#5-present-menu-options)
-
-#### EXECUTION RULES:
-
-- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
-- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
-- After other menu items execution, return to this menu
-- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then end with display again of the menu options
-
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES
-
-**IN SCOPE:**
-- Persona section of agent.yaml (role, tone, expertise, principles, constraints)
-- Referencing personaProperties.md and principlesCrafting.md
-- Evaluating persona clarity, specificity, and consistency
-- Checking alignment between persona elements
-
-**OUT OF SCOPE:**
-- Metadata fields (handled in step-07b)
-- Menu items (handled in step-07d)
-- System architecture (handled in step-07e)
-- Technical implementation details
-
-**DO NOT:**
-- Validate metadata properties in this step
-- Question the agent's core purpose (that's for earlier steps)
-- Suggest additional menu items
-- Modify fields beyond persona
-
-## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
-
-ONLY WHEN [C continue option] is selected and [validation complete with any findings addressed], will you then load and read fully `{nextStepFile}` to execute and begin [menu validation].
-
-## SUCCESS METRICS
-
-✓ **Complete Success:** All checks pass, persona is well-defined and consistent
-✓ **Partial Success:** Failures fixed via [F] option, warnings acknowledged
-✓ **Failure:** Blocking failures remain when user selects [C]
-
-**CRITICAL:** A weak or generic persona is a blocking issue that should be fixed before proceeding.

package/bmad/bmb/workflows/agent/steps-c/step-08d-menu-validation.md

@@ -1,158 +0,0 @@
----
-name: 'step-07d-menu-validation'
-description: 'Validate menu items and patterns'
-
-# File References
-nextStepFile: './step-08e-structure-validation.md'
-agentMenuPatterns: ../data/agent-menu-patterns.md
-builtYaml: '{bmb_creations_output_folder}/{agent-name}/{agent-name}.agent.yaml'
-
-# Task References
-advancedElicitationTask: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/advanced-elicitation/workflow.xml'
-partyModeWorkflow: '{project-root}/_bmad/core/workflows/party-mode/workflow.md'
----
-
-# STEP GOAL
-
-Validate that the agent's menu (commands/tools) follows BMAD patterns, is well-structured, properly documented, and aligns with the agent's persona and purpose.
-
-## MANDATORY EXECUTION RULES
-
-- **NEVER skip validation checks** - All menu items must be verified
-- **ALWAYS load the reference document** - agentMenuPatterns.md
-- **NEVER modify files without user approval** - Report findings first, await menu selection
-- **ALWAYS use absolute paths** when referencing files
-- **CRITICAL:** This is a validation step, not an editing step
-
-## EXECUTION PROTOCOLS
-
-### Protocol 1: Load and Compare
-1. Read the menu patterns reference from `{agentMenuPatterns}`
-2. Read the built agent YAML from `{builtYaml}`
-3. Extract the menu/commands section from the builtYaml
-4. Compare actual menu against validation rules
-
-### Protocol 2: Validation Checks
-Perform these checks systematically:
-
-1. **Menu Structure**
-   - [ ] Menu section exists and is properly formatted
-   - [ ] At least one menu item defined (unless intentionally tool-less)
-   - [ ] Menu items follow proper YAML structure
-   - [ ] Each item has required fields (name, description, pattern)
-
-2. **Menu Item Requirements**
-   For each menu item:
-   - [ ] name: Present, unique, uses kebab-case
-   - [ ] description: Clear and concise
-   - [ ] pattern: Valid regex pattern or tool reference
-   - [ ] scope: Appropriate scope defined (if applicable)
-
-3. **Pattern Quality**
-   - [ ] Patterns are valid and testable
-   - [ ] Patterns are specific enough to match intended inputs
-   - [ ] Patterns are not overly restrictive
-   - [ ] Patterns use appropriate regex syntax
-
-4. **Description Quality**
-   - [ ] Each item has clear description
-   - [ ] Descriptions explain what the item does
-   - [ ] Descriptions are consistent in style
-   - [ ] Descriptions help users understand when to use
-
-5. **Alignment Checks**
-   - [ ] Menu items align with agent's role/purpose
-   - [ ] Menu items are supported by agent's expertise
-   - [ ] Menu items fit within agent's constraints
-   - [ ] Menu items are appropriate for target users
-
-6. **Completeness**
-   - [ ] Core capabilities for this role are covered
-   - [ ] No obvious missing functionality
-   - [ ] Menu scope is appropriate (not too sparse/overloaded)
-   - [ ] Related functionality is grouped logically
-
-7. **Standards Compliance**
-   - [ ] No prohibited patterns or commands
-   - [ ] No security vulnerabilities in patterns
-   - [ ] No ambiguous or conflicting items
-   - [ ] Consistent naming conventions
-
-### Protocol 3: Report Findings
-Organize your report into three sections:
-
-**PASSING CHECKS** (List what passed)
-```
-✓ Menu structure properly formatted
-✓ 5 menu items defined, all with required fields
-✓ All patterns are valid regex
-✓ Menu items align with agent role
-```
-
-**WARNINGS** (Non-blocking issues)
-```
-⚠ Item "analyze-data" description is vague
-⚠ No menu item for [common capability X]
-⚠ Pattern for "custom-command" very broad, may over-match
-```
-
-**FAILURES** (Blocking issues that must be fixed)
-```
-✗ Duplicate menu item name: "process" appears twice
-✗ Invalid regex pattern: "[unclosed bracket"
-✗ Menu item "system-admin" violates security guidelines
-✗ No menu items defined for agent type that requires tools
-```
-
-### Protocol 4: Menu System
-
-#### 5. Present MENU OPTIONS
-
-Display: "**Select an Option:** [A] Advanced Elicitation [F] Fix Findings [P] Party Mode [C] Continue"
-
-#### Menu Handling Logic:
-
-- IF A: Execute {advancedElicitationTask}, and when finished redisplay the menu
-- IF F: Apply auto-fixes to {builtYaml} for identified issues, then redisplay the menu
-- IF P: Execute {partyModeWorkflow}, and when finished redisplay the menu
-- IF C: Proceed to next validation step, update frontmatter, then only then load, read entire file, then execute {nextStepFile}
-- IF Any other comments or queries: help user respond then [Redisplay Menu Options](#5-present-menu-options)
-
-#### EXECUTION RULES:
-
-- ALWAYS halt and wait for user input after presenting menu
-- ONLY proceed to next step when user selects 'C'
-- After other menu items execution, return to this menu
-- User can chat or ask questions - always respond and then end with display again of the menu options
-
-## CONTEXT BOUNDARIES
-
-**IN SCOPE:**
-- Menu/commands section of agent.yaml
-- Referencing agentMenuPatterns.md
-- Menu structure, patterns, and alignment
-- Individual menu item validation
-
-**OUT OF SCOPE:**
-- Metadata fields (handled in step-07b)
-- Persona fields (handled in step-07c)
-- System architecture (handled in step-07e)
-- Workflow/capability implementation (handled in step-07f)
-
-**DO NOT:**
-- Validate metadata or persona in this step
-- Suggest entirely new capabilities (that's for earlier steps)
-- Question whether menu items are "good enough" qualitatively beyond standards
-- Modify fields beyond menu
-
-## CRITICAL STEP COMPLETION NOTE
-
-ONLY WHEN [C continue option] is selected and [validation complete with any findings addressed], will you then load and read fully `{nextStepFile}` to execute and begin [structure validation].
-
-## SUCCESS METRICS
-
-✓ **Complete Success:** All checks pass, menu is well-structured and aligned
-✓ **Partial Success:** Failures fixed via [F] option, warnings acknowledged
-✓ **Failure:** Blocking failures remain when user selects [C]
-
-**CRITICAL:** Invalid regex patterns or security vulnerabilities in menu items are blocking issues.