shipquick 1.0.0

package/_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/knowledge/pm/pm-knowledge.md

@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
+# Product Manager Knowledge (Enhanced)
+
+## Role
+
+Product Manager + SAFe Feature Management Expert
+
+## SAFe Responsibilities
+
+- WSJF prioritization
+- PI Objectives creation
+- Feature refinement
+- Roadmap management
+- Vision communication
+- Stakeholder alignment
+- PO Sync facilitation
+
+## Key Concepts
+
+### WSJF (Weighted Shortest Job First)
+
+**Formula:**
+
+```
+WSJF = Cost of Delay / Job Size
+
+Cost of Delay = Business Value + Time Criticality + Risk Reduction/Opportunity Enablement
+```
+
+**Scoring Scale (Fibonacci):**
+| Score | Meaning |
+|-------|---------|
+| 1 | Minimal |
+| 2 | Low |
+| 3 | Moderate |
+| 5 | Significant |
+| 8 | High |
+| 13 | Critical |
+| 21 | Extreme |
+
+### PI Objectives
+
+**SMART Criteria:**
+
+- **S**pecific: Clear what will be delivered
+- **M**easurable: Can verify completion
+- **A**chievable: Within capacity
+- **R**elevant: Aligned with vision
+- **T**ime-bound: Within PI
+
+**Business Value:** 1-10 score assigned by Business Owner
+
+**Types:**
+
+- Committed: High confidence (≥80%)
+- Uncommitted: Lower confidence or stretch
+
+### Feature Writing
+
+**Format:**
+
+```
+Feature: [Title]
+Benefit Hypothesis: [Expected outcome]
+Acceptance Criteria:
+- [Criterion 1]
+- [Criterion 2]
+```
+
+### Roadmap Levels
+
+- **Portfolio Roadmap**: Multi-year strategic direction
+- **Solution Roadmap**: 1-2 years of solution evolution
+- **PI Roadmap**: Current + next 2 PIs
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. Apply WSJF for economic prioritization
+2. Create Features with clear benefit hypotheses
+3. Write SMART PI Objectives
+4. Communicate vision clearly
+5. Refine Features before PI Planning
+6. Run PO Sync weekly
+7. Manage stakeholder expectations
+8. Track Roadmap progress

package/_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/knowledge/po/po-knowledge.md

@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+# Product Owner Knowledge (Enhanced)
+
+## Role
+
+Product Owner + Team Value Maximizer
+
+## SAFe Responsibilities
+
+- Team Backlog ownership
+- Story refinement
+- Iteration Goals definition
+- Stakeholder collaboration
+- Acceptance of completed work
+- Definition of Ready enforcement
+
+## Key Concepts
+
+### Team Backlog
+
+- **Single source of truth** for team work
+- Contains: User Stories, Enabler Stories, Defects, Tech Debt
+- **Prioritized** by value (WSJF principles at team level)
+
+### Story Refinement
+
+- Break Features into Stories
+- Write clear Acceptance Criteria
+- Ensure stories meet Definition of Ready
+- Estimate using Story Points
+
+### INVEST Criteria
+
+| Criterion       | Question                 |
+| --------------- | ------------------------ |
+| **I**ndependent | Can be built separately? |
+| **N**egotiable  | Details flexible?        |
+| **V**aluable    | Delivers value?          |
+| **E**stimable   | Can be sized?            |
+| **S**mall       | Fits in iteration?       |
+| **T**estable    | Has clear AC?            |
+
+### Acceptance Criteria Format
+
+```
+Given [context]
+When [action]
+Then [expected result]
+```
+
+### Story Point Scale
+
+1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13 (Fibonacci)
+
+- **1-3**: Small, well-understood
+- **5**: Medium complexity
+- **8+**: Consider splitting
+
+### Iteration Goals
+
+- 2-4 outcome-focused goals per Iteration
+- Aligned with PI Objectives
+- Team commits to goals
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. Own the Team Backlog
+2. Write Stories with clear, testable AC
+3. Apply INVEST criteria
+4. Prioritize by value
+5. Be available to answer questions
+6. Accept work based on AC
+7. Refine continuously
+8. Communicate Iteration Goals

package/_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/knowledge/qa/qa-knowledge.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# QA Engineer Knowledge
+
+## Role
+
+QA Engineer + SAFe CDP Quality Gate Enforcer
+
+## SAFe Responsibilities
+
+- CDP quality gate enforcement
+- Automated regression testing
+- Story-level test automation
+- Continuous Integration test suites
+
+## Key Concepts
+
+- **CDP Quality Gates** = Automated checkpoints in Continuous Delivery Pipeline
+- **Regression Testing** = Ensure existing functionality is preserved
+- **Test Automation** = API and E2E tests for implemented code
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. Enforce CDP quality gates for every commit
+2. Generate comprehensive test coverage
+3. Focus on happy path + critical edge cases
+4. Tests should pass on first run

package/_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/knowledge/quick-flow-solo-dev/quick-flow-solo-dev-knowledge.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# Quick Flow Solo Dev Knowledge
+
+## Role
+
+Elite Full-Stack Developer + SAFe Enabler Specialist
+
+## SAFe Responsibilities
+
+- Rapid Enabler Feature implementation
+- Tech spec to code delivery
+- Minimum ceremony, maximum efficiency
+- Quick prototyping for architectural runway
+
+## Key Concepts
+
+- **Enabler Features** = Technical foundation work
+- **Architectural Runway** = Technical infrastructure for Features
+- **Quick Flow** = Rapid spec-to-code delivery
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. Support Enabler Epics/Features for technical foundation
+2. Validate architectural decisions quickly
+3. Iterate fast, refactor later
+4. Keep artifacts lean but functional

package/_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/knowledge/rte/rte-knowledge.md

@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+# Release Train Engineer Knowledge (Enhanced)
+
+## Role
+
+Release Train Engineer + ART Flow Master
+
+## SAFe Responsibilities
+
+- PI Planning facilitation (2-day event)
+- ART Sync management (weekly)
+- ROAM risk categorization
+- Inspect & Adapt execution
+- System Demo facilitation
+- Flow metrics tracking
+- Dependency management
+- Impediment escalation
+
+## Key Concepts
+
+### PI Planning
+
+- **2-Day Event**: Vision → Breakout → Plan Review → Confidence Vote
+- **Inputs**: Vision, Roadmap, Features, Architecture
+- **Outputs**: PI Objectives, ROAM Board, Committed Plan
+
+### ART Sync
+
+- **Weekly event**: 30-60 minutes
+- **Focus**: Dependencies, blockers, risks
+- **Attendees**: RTE, PMs, POs, SMs
+
+### ROAM Risk Management
+
+| Category      | Definition            | Action           |
+| ------------- | --------------------- | ---------------- |
+| **R**esolved  | Risk eliminated       | Close item       |
+| **O**wned     | Assigned to someone   | Track progress   |
+| **A**ccepted  | Accepted, no action   | Monitor          |
+| **M**itigated | Actions reduce impact | Track mitigation |
+
+### Flow Metrics
+
+| Metric                  | What It Measures    |
+| ----------------------- | ------------------- |
+| **Flow Distribution**   | Work type balance   |
+| **Flow Velocity**       | Items per iteration |
+| **Flow Time**           | Cycle time          |
+| **Flow Load**           | WIP levels          |
+| **Flow Predictability** | Planned vs Actual   |
+
+### Inspect & Adapt
+
+- **3-Part Structure**: System Demo → Quantitative Review → Problem-Solving Workshop
+- **Duration**: 4-6 hours
+- **Key Output**: Improvement items
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. Facilitate effective PI Planning (not just logistics)
+2. Run ART Sync for visibility, not status
+3. Apply ROAM rigorously
+4. Track flow metrics every PI
+5. Drive relentless improvement via I&A
+6. Remove impediments quickly
+7. Build strong relationships across teams
+8. Coach teams on SAFe practices

package/_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/knowledge/sm/sm-knowledge.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# Scrum Master Knowledge
+
+## Role
+
+Scrum Master + SAFe Iteration Coordinator
+
+## SAFe Responsibilities
+
+- ART Sync participation
+- ROAM risk management
+- Iteration ceremonies facilitation
+- Story preparation
+
+## Key Concepts
+
+- **ART Sync** = cross-team dependency coordination
+- **ROAM** = Resolved, Owned, Accepted, Mitigated (risk states)
+- **Iteration Goals** align with PI Objectives
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. Participate actively in ART Sync
+2. Apply ROAM for risk categorization
+3. Facilitate effective Iteration ceremonies
+4. Prepare Stories with clear Acceptance Criteria

package/_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/knowledge/solution-architect/solution-architect-knowledge.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# Solution Architect Knowledge
+
+## Role
+
+Solution Architect + Cross-ART Technical Leader
+
+## SAFe Responsibilities
+
+- Solution Intent ownership
+- Architectural Runway planning
+- NFR definition at Solution level
+- Cross-ART technical alignment
+
+## Key Concepts
+
+- **Solution Intent** = Living documentation of system behavior
+- **Architectural Runway** = Technical foundation enabling Features
+- **NFRs** = Non-Functional Requirements
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. Own and evolve Solution Intent
+2. Plan Enabler Epics for architectural runway
+3. Define NFRs with measurable criteria
+4. Ensure technical alignment across ARTs

package/_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/knowledge/solution-manager/solution-manager-knowledge.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# Solution Manager Knowledge
+
+## Role
+
+Solution Manager + Multi-ART Coordination Expert
+
+## SAFe Responsibilities
+
+- Solution Backlog ownership
+- Capability management with Business Owners
+- Cross-ART coordination
+- Solution Vision alignment
+
+## Key Concepts
+
+- **Solution Backlog** = Capabilities ordered by WSJF
+- **Capabilities** = Large-scale features spanning multiple ARTs
+- **Business Owners** = Stakeholders accountable for value
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. Own and maintain Solution Backlog
+2. WSJF prioritize Capabilities with Business Owners
+3. Coordinate across ARTs for seamless delivery
+4. Align with Solution Vision

package/_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/knowledge/ste/ste-knowledge.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# Solution Train Engineer Knowledge
+
+## Role
+
+Solution Train Engineer + Value Stream Coordinator
+
+## SAFe Responsibilities
+
+- Solution Train Sync facilitation
+- Large Solution Inspect & Adapt
+- Cross-ART coordination
+- Value Stream optimization
+
+## Key Concepts
+
+- **Solution Train Sync** = Cross-ART coordination event
+- **Large Solution I&A** = System-wide retrospective
+- **Value Stream** = End-to-end flow of value
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. Facilitate Solution Train Sync regularly
+2. Run Large Solution I&A for systemic improvement
+3. Manage cross-ART dependencies visibly
+4. Optimize Value Stream flow

package/_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/knowledge/system-architect/system-architect-knowledge.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# System Architect Knowledge
+
+## Role
+
+System Architect + ART-level Technical Leader
+
+## SAFe Responsibilities
+
+- Enabler Features definition
+- System design within ART
+- Technical decisions documentation
+- Team collaboration on architecture
+
+## Key Concepts
+
+- **Enabler Features** = Technical Features for architectural runway
+- **System Design** = ART-level technical architecture
+- **Incremental Architecture** = Evolve architecture with delivery
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. Define Enabler Features for technical foundation
+2. Create testable, deployable system designs
+3. Document technical decisions
+4. Collaborate with teams, don't dictate

package/_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/knowledge/tech-writer/tech-writer-knowledge.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# Tech Writer Knowledge
+
+## Role
+
+Technical Documentation Specialist + SAFe PI Documentation Expert
+
+## SAFe Responsibilities
+
+- PI release notes creation
+- Solution-level documentation
+- Technical documentation standards
+- Knowledge management
+
+## Key Concepts
+
+- **PI Release Notes** = Summary of Features delivered in a PI
+- **Solution Documentation** = Enterprise-wide technical docs
+- **Living Documentation** = Continuously updated with changes
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. Create PI release notes for every increment
+2. Maintain Solution-level documentation
+3. Use diagrams over lengthy text
+4. Follow enterprise documentation standards

package/_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/knowledge/ux-designer/ux-designer-knowledge.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# UX Designer Knowledge
+
+## Role
+
+User Experience Designer + SAFe Design System Expert
+
+## SAFe Responsibilities
+
+- Design System alignment
+- User research integration
+- UI/UX for Features and Stories
+- Accessibility compliance
+
+## Key Concepts
+
+- **Design System** = Enterprise-wide UI components and patterns
+- **User Research** = Informs Feature and Story design
+- **Accessibility** = WCAG 2.1 compliance
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. Align all designs with enterprise Design System
+2. Incorporate user research insights
+3. Ensure accessibility from the start
+4. Collaborate with Product Owner on Story UI

package/_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/knowledge/ux-researcher/ux-researcher-knowledge.md

@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+# UX Researcher Knowledge
+
+## Role
+
+UX Research Specialist + SAFe Customer-Centric Discovery Expert
+
+## SAFe Responsibilities
+
+- Support SAFe Continuous Exploration
+- User interview facilitation
+- Jobs-to-be-Done discovery
+- Research synthesis for Epic validation
+
+## Key Concepts
+
+- **Continuous Exploration** = SAFe practice for customer discovery
+- **Jobs-to-be-Done** = User job and outcome framework
+- **Epic Hypothesis** = Validated with user research
+
+## Best Practices
+
+1. Ask about past behaviors, not hypothetical futures
+2. Understand the job-to-be-done before proposing solutions
+3. Ground insights in observable behaviors
+4. Support Epic hypothesis validation with research

package/_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/module-help.csv

@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+module,phase,name,code,sequence,workflow-file,command,required,agent,options,description,output-location,outputs,
+bmm-safe,anytime,Document Project,DP,10,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/document-project/workflow.yaml,bmad-safe-document-project,false,analyst,Create Mode,"Analyze an existing project to produce useful documentation",project-knowledge,*,
+bmm-safe,anytime,Quick Spec,TS,20,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/bmad-quick-flow/quick-spec/workflow.md,bmad-safe-quick-spec,false,quick-flow-solo-dev,Create Mode,"Do not suggest for potentially very complex things unless requested or if the user complains that they do not want to follow the extensive planning of the bmad method. Quick one-off tasks small changes simple apps utilities without extensive planning",planning_artifacts,"tech spec",
+bmm-safe,anytime,Quick Dev,QD,30,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/bmad-quick-flow/quick-dev/workflow.md,bmad-safe-quick-dev,false,quick-flow-solo-dev,Create Mode,"Quick one-off tasks small changes simple apps utilities without extensive planning - Do not suggest for potentially very complex things unless requested or if the user complains that they do not want to follow the extensive planning of the bmad method, unless the user is already working through the implementation phase and just requests a 1 off things not already in the plan",,,
+bmm-safe,anytime,Correct Course,CC,40,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/4-implementation/correct-course/workflow.yaml,bmad-safe-correct-course,false,sm,Create Mode,"Anytime: Navigate significant changes. May recommend start over update PRD redo architecture sprint planning or correct epics and stories",planning_artifacts,"change proposal",
+bmm-safe,1-analysis,Brainstorm Project,BP,10,_bmad-safe/core/workflows/brainstorming/workflow.md,bmad-brainstorming,false,analyst,data=_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/data/project-context-template.md,"Expert Guided Facilitation through a single or multiple techniques",planning_artifacts,"brainstorming session",
+bmm-safe,1-analysis,Market Research,MR,20,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/1-analysis/research/workflow.md,bmad-safe-research,false,analyst,Create Mode research_type=market,"Market analysis competitive landscape customer needs and trends","planning_artifacts|project-knowledge","research documents"
+bmm-safe,1-analysis,Domain Research,DR,21,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/1-analysis/research/workflow.md,bmad-safe-research,false,analyst,Create Mode research_type=domain,"Industry domain deep dive subject matter expertise and terminology","planning_artifacts|project-knowledge","research documents"
+bmm-safe,1-analysis,Technical Research,TR,22,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/1-analysis/research/workflow.md,bmad-safe-research,false,analyst,Create Mode research_type=technical,"Technical feasibility architecture options and implementation approaches","planning_artifacts|project-knowledge","research documents"
+bmm-safe,1-analysis,Create Brief,CB,30,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/workflow.md,bmad-safe-create-brief,false,analyst,Create Mode,"A guided experience to nail down your product idea",planning_artifacts,"product brief",
+bmm-safe,1-analysis,Validate Brief,VB,40,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/1-analysis/create-product-brief/workflow.md,bmad-safe-validate-brief,false,analyst,Validate Mode,"Validates product brief completeness",planning_artifacts,"brief validation report",
+bmm-safe,2-planning,Create PRD,CP,10,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/workflow.md,bmad-safe-prd,true,pm,Create Mode,"Expert led facilitation to produce your Product Requirements Document",planning_artifacts,prd,
+bmm-safe,2-planning,Validate PRD,VP,20,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-prd/workflow.md,bmad-safe-prd,false,pm,Validate Mode,"Validate PRD is comprehensive lean well organized and cohesive",planning_artifacts,"prd validation report",
+bmm-safe,2-planning,Create UX,CU,30,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-ux-design/workflow.md,bmad-safe-create-ux-design,false,ux-designer,Create Mode,"Guidance through realizing the plan for your UX, strongly recommended if a UI is a primary piece of the proposed project",planning_artifacts,"ux design",
+bmm-safe,2-planning,Validate UX,VU,40,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/2-plan-workflows/create-ux-design/workflow.md,bmad-safe-create-ux-design,false,ux-designer,Validate Mode,"Validates UX design deliverables",planning_artifacts,"ux validation report",
+,anytime,Create Dataflow,CDF,50,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/excalidraw-diagrams/create-dataflow/workflow.yaml,bmad-safe-create-excalidraw-dataflow,false,ux-designer,Create Mode,"Create data flow diagrams (DFD) in Excalidraw format - can be called standalone or during any workflow to add visual documentation",planning_artifacts,"dataflow diagram",
+,anytime,Create Diagram,CED,51,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/excalidraw-diagrams/create-diagram/workflow.yaml,bmad-safe-create-excalidraw-diagram,false,ux-designer,Create Mode,"Create system architecture diagrams ERDs UML diagrams or general technical diagrams in Excalidraw format - use anytime or call from architecture workflow to add visual documentation",planning_artifacts,"diagram",
+,anytime,Create Flowchart,CFC,52,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/excalidraw-diagrams/create-flowchart/workflow.yaml,bmad-safe-create-excalidraw-flowchart,false,ux-designer,Create Mode,"Create a flowchart visualization in Excalidraw format for processes pipelines or logic flows - use anytime or during architecture to add process documentation",planning_artifacts,"flowchart",
+,anytime,Create Wireframe,CEW,53,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/excalidraw-diagrams/create-wireframe/workflow.yaml,bmad-safe-create-excalidraw-wireframe,false,ux-designer,Create Mode,"Create website or app wireframes in Excalidraw format - use anytime standalone or call from UX workflow to add UI mockups",planning_artifacts,"wireframe",
+bmm-safe,3-solutioning,Create Architecture,CA,10,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/3-solutioning/create-architecture/workflow.md,bmad-safe-create-architecture,true,architect,Create Mode,"Guided Workflow to document technical decisions",planning_artifacts,architecture,
+bmm-safe,3-solutioning,Validate Architecture,VA,20,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/3-solutioning/create-architecture/workflow.md,bmad-safe-create-architecture,false,architect,Validate Mode,"Validates architecture completeness",planning_artifacts,"architecture validation report",
+bmm-safe,3-solutioning,Create Epics and Stories,CE,30,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/3-solutioning/create-epics-and-stories/workflow.md,bmad-safe-create-epics-and-stories,true,pm,Create Mode,"Create the Epics and Stories Listing",planning_artifacts,"epics and stories",
+bmm-safe,3-solutioning,Create Capability,CC,35,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/3-solutioning/create-capability/workflow.yaml,bmad-safe-create-capability,false,solution-manager,Create Mode,"Break Epic into Capabilities for Solution Train - bridge between Epics and Features",planning_artifacts,"capability",
+bmm-safe,3-solutioning,Validate Epics and Stories,VE,40,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/3-solutioning/create-epics-and-stories/workflow.md,bmad-safe-create-epics-and-stories,false,pm,Validate Mode,"Validates epics and stories completeness",planning_artifacts,"epics validation report",
+bmm-safe,3-solutioning,Check Implementation Readiness,IR,70,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/3-solutioning/check-implementation-readiness/workflow.md,bmad-safe-check-implementation-readiness,true,architect,Validate Mode,"Ensure PRD UX Architecture and Epics Stories are aligned",planning_artifacts,"readiness report",
+bmm-safe,4-implementation,Sprint Planning,SP,10,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/4-implementation/sprint-planning/workflow.yaml,bmad-safe-sprint-planning,true,sm,Create Mode,"Generate sprint plan for development tasks - this kicks off the implementation phase by producing a plan the implementation agents will follow in sequence for every story in the plan.",implementation_artifacts,"sprint status",
+bmm-safe,4-implementation,Sprint Status,SS,20,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/4-implementation/sprint-status/workflow.yaml,bmad-safe-sprint-status,false,sm,Create Mode,"Anytime: Summarize sprint status and route to next workflow",,,
+bmm-safe,4-implementation,Create Story,CS,30,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/4-implementation/create-story/workflow.yaml,bmad-safe-create-story,true,sm,Create Mode,"Story cycle start: Prepare first found story in the sprint plan that is next, or if the command is run with a specific epic and story designation with context. Once complete, then VS then DS then CR then back to DS if needed or next CS or ER",implementation_artifacts,story,
+bmm-safe,4-implementation,Validate Story,VS,35,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/4-implementation/create-story/workflow.yaml,bmad-safe-create-story,false,sm,Validate Mode,"Validates story readiness and completeness before development work begins",implementation_artifacts,"story validation report",
+bmm-safe,4-implementation,Dev Story,DS,40,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/4-implementation/dev-story/workflow.yaml,bmad-safe-dev-story,true,dev,Create Mode,"Story cycle: Execute story implementation tasks and tests then CR then back to DS if fixes needed",,,
+bmm-safe,4-implementation,Code Review,CR,50,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/4-implementation/code-review/workflow.yaml,bmad-safe-code-review,false,dev,Create Mode,"Story cycle: If issues back to DS if approved then next CS or ER if epic complete",,,
+bmm-safe,4-implementation,Retrospective,ER,60,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/4-implementation/retrospective/workflow.yaml,bmad-safe-retrospective,false,sm,Create Mode,"Optional at epic end: Review completed work lessons learned and next epic or if major issues consider CC",implementation_artifacts,retrospective,
+bmm-safe,4-implementation,Automate,QA,45,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/qa/automate/workflow.yaml,bmad-safe-automate,false,qa,Create Mode,"Generate automated API and E2E tests for implemented code using the project's existing test framework (detects Playwright, Jest, Vitest, etc). Use after implementation to add test coverage. NOT for code review or story validation - use CR for that.",implementation_artifacts,"test suite",
+bmm-safe,4-implementation,PI Planning,PP,5,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/4-implementation/pi-planning/workflow.yaml,bmad-safe-pi-planning,true,rte,Create Mode,"SAFe PI Planning event facilitation - 2-day event aligning all ART teams on shared mission and Vision",implementation_artifacts,"pi objectives|roam risks",
+bmm-safe,4-implementation,ART Sync,AS,15,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/4-implementation/art-sync/workflow.yaml,bmad-safe-art-sync,false,rte,Facilitate Mode,"Weekly ART synchronization meeting to assess progress and address impediments",implementation_artifacts,"sync notes",
+bmm-safe,4-implementation,Inspect and Adapt,IA,65,_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/workflows/4-implementation/inspect-adapt/workflow.yaml,bmad-safe-inspect-adapt,false,rte,Facilitate Mode,"PI-end Inspect and Adapt event - System Demo quantitative measurement and problem-solving workshop",implementation_artifacts,"i&a report",

package/_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/tasks/apply-wsjf.md

@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
+# Apply WSJF Task
+
+## Purpose
+
+Calculate WSJF score for prioritization.
+
+---
+
+## WSJF Formula
+
+**WSJF = Cost of Delay ÷ Job Size**
+
+Where **Cost of Delay = Business Value + Time Criticality + Risk Reduction/Opportunity Enablement**
+
+---
+
+## Scoring Scale (1-10 Fibonacci)
+
+| Score | Value       |
+| ----- | ----------- |
+| 1     | Minimal     |
+| 2     | Low         |
+| 3     | Moderate    |
+| 5     | Significant |
+| 8     | High        |
+| 13    | Critical    |
+| 21    | Extreme     |
+
+---
+
+## Steps
+
+1. **Business Value (BV)**: Revenue/market impact
+2. **Time Criticality (TC)**: Urgency, deadlines
+3. **RR/OE**: Risk reduction or opportunity enabled
+4. **Job Size**: Effort relative to other items
+
+---
+
+## Calculation
+
+```
+Cost of Delay = BV + TC + RR/OE
+WSJF = Cost of Delay / Job Size
+```
+
+---
+
+## Output
+
+Rank items by WSJF score (highest first).

package/_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/tasks/create-pi-objectives.md

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+# Create PI Objectives Task
+
+## Purpose
+
+Create SMART PI Objectives with Business Value.
+
+---
+
+## PI Objective Components
+
+1. **Objective Statement**: Clear, measurable outcome
+2. **Business Value (1-10)**: Assigned by Business Owner
+3. **Committed/Uncommitted**: Team confidence level
+4. **Features**: List of Features included
+
+---
+
+## SMART Criteria
+
+- **S**pecific: Clear what will be delivered
+- **M**easurable: Can verify completion
+- **A**chievable: Within team capacity
+- **R**elevant: Aligned with PI vision
+- **T**ime-bound: Completed within PI
+
+---
+
+## Steps
+
+1. Review Features committed for PI
+2. Group Features into logical outcomes
+3. Write 5-10 PI Objectives
+4. Mark each as Committed or Uncommitted
+5. Business Owner assigns BV (1-10)
+6. Calculate planned BV for PI
+
+---
+
+## Output
+
+PI Objectives document with:
+
+- Objective statements
+- BV scores
+- Commitment status
+- Linked Features

package/_bmad-safe/bmm-safe/tasks/roam-risk.md

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+# ROAM Risk Categorization Task
+
+## Purpose
+
+Categorize risks using ROAM framework.
+
+---
+
+## ROAM Categories
+
+| Category      | Definition            | Action           |
+| ------------- | --------------------- | ---------------- |
+| **R**esolved  | Risk eliminated       | Close item       |
+| **O**wned     | Assigned to someone   | Track progress   |
+| **A**ccepted  | Accepted, no action   | Monitor          |
+| **M**itigated | Actions reduce impact | Track mitigation |
+
+---
+
+## Steps
+
+1. Identify risks during PI Planning or execution
+2. Document each risk
+3. Assign ROAM category
+4. If Owned/Mitigated: Assign owner + due date
+5. Track in ROAM board
+6. Review weekly in ART Sync
+
+---
+
+## Risk Template
+
+```
+Risk: [Description]
+Category: [R/O/A/M]
+Owner: [Name]
+Due Date: [Date]
+Mitigation: [Actions]
+Status: [Open/Closed]
+```
+
+---
+
+## Output
+
+ROAM board with all risks categorized and tracked.