shieldcortex 3.5.0 → 4.0.1

package/dashboard/.next/standalone/dashboard/node_modules/next/dist/client/components/segment-cache/scheduler.js

@@ -1,1150 +0,0 @@
-"use strict";
-Object.defineProperty(exports, "__esModule", {
-    value: true
-});
-0 && (module.exports = {
-    cancelPrefetchTask: null,
-    isPrefetchTaskDirty: null,
-    pingPrefetchTask: null,
-    reschedulePrefetchTask: null,
-    schedulePrefetchTask: null,
-    startRevalidationCooldown: null
-});
-function _export(target, all) {
-    for(var name in all)Object.defineProperty(target, name, {
-        enumerable: true,
-        get: all[name]
-    });
-}
-_export(exports, {
-    cancelPrefetchTask: function() {
-        return cancelPrefetchTask;
-    },
-    isPrefetchTaskDirty: function() {
-        return isPrefetchTaskDirty;
-    },
-    pingPrefetchTask: function() {
-        return pingPrefetchTask;
-    },
-    reschedulePrefetchTask: function() {
-        return reschedulePrefetchTask;
-    },
-    schedulePrefetchTask: function() {
-        return schedulePrefetchTask;
-    },
-    startRevalidationCooldown: function() {
-        return startRevalidationCooldown;
-    }
-});
-const _approutertypes = require("../../../shared/lib/app-router-types");
-const _matchsegments = require("../match-segments");
-const _cache = require("./cache");
-const _varypath = require("./vary-path");
-const _cachekey = require("./cache-key");
-const _types = require("./types");
-const _segment = require("../../../shared/lib/segment");
-const scheduleMicrotask = typeof queueMicrotask === 'function' ? queueMicrotask : (fn)=>Promise.resolve().then(fn).catch((error)=>setTimeout(()=>{
-            throw error;
-        }));
-const taskHeap = [];
-let inProgressRequests = 0;
-let sortIdCounter = 0;
-let didScheduleMicrotask = false;
-// The most recently hovered (or touched, etc) link, i.e. the most recent task
-// scheduled at Intent priority. There's only ever a single task at Intent
-// priority at a time. We reserve special network bandwidth for this task only.
-let mostRecentlyHoveredLink = null;
-// CDN cache propagation delay after revalidation (in milliseconds)
-const REVALIDATION_COOLDOWN_MS = 300;
-// Timeout handle for the revalidation cooldown. When non-null, prefetch
-// requests are blocked to allow CDN cache propagation.
-let revalidationCooldownTimeoutHandle = null;
-function startRevalidationCooldown() {
-    // Clear any existing timeout in case multiple revalidations happen
-    // in quick succession.
-    if (revalidationCooldownTimeoutHandle !== null) {
-        clearTimeout(revalidationCooldownTimeoutHandle);
-    }
-    // Schedule the cooldown to expire after the delay.
-    revalidationCooldownTimeoutHandle = setTimeout(()=>{
-        revalidationCooldownTimeoutHandle = null;
-        // Retry the prefetch queue now that the cooldown has expired.
-        ensureWorkIsScheduled();
-    }, REVALIDATION_COOLDOWN_MS);
-}
-function schedulePrefetchTask(key, treeAtTimeOfPrefetch, fetchStrategy, priority, onInvalidate) {
-    // Spawn a new prefetch task
-    const task = {
-        key,
-        treeAtTimeOfPrefetch,
-        cacheVersion: (0, _cache.getCurrentCacheVersion)(),
-        priority,
-        phase: 1,
-        hasBackgroundWork: false,
-        spawnedRuntimePrefetches: null,
-        fetchStrategy,
-        sortId: sortIdCounter++,
-        isCanceled: false,
-        onInvalidate,
-        _heapIndex: -1
-    };
-    trackMostRecentlyHoveredLink(task);
-    heapPush(taskHeap, task);
-    // Schedule an async task to process the queue.
-    //
-    // The main reason we process the queue in an async task is for batching.
-    // It's common for a single JS task/event to trigger multiple prefetches.
-    // By deferring to a microtask, we only process the queue once per JS task.
-    // If they have different priorities, it also ensures they are processed in
-    // the optimal order.
-    ensureWorkIsScheduled();
-    return task;
-}
-function cancelPrefetchTask(task) {
-    // Remove the prefetch task from the queue. If the task already completed,
-    // then this is a no-op.
-    //
-    // We must also explicitly mark the task as canceled so that a blocked task
-    // does not get added back to the queue when it's pinged by the network.
-    task.isCanceled = true;
-    heapDelete(taskHeap, task);
-}
-function reschedulePrefetchTask(task, treeAtTimeOfPrefetch, fetchStrategy, priority) {
-    // Bump the prefetch task to the top of the queue, as if it were a fresh
-    // task. This is essentially the same as canceling the task and scheduling
-    // a new one, except it reuses the original object.
-    //
-    // The primary use case is to increase the priority of a Link-initated
-    // prefetch on hover.
-    // Un-cancel the task, in case it was previously canceled.
-    task.isCanceled = false;
-    task.phase = 1;
-    // Assign a new sort ID to move it ahead of all other tasks at the same
-    // priority level. (Higher sort IDs are processed first.)
-    task.sortId = sortIdCounter++;
-    task.priority = // If this task is the most recently hovered link, maintain its
-    // Intent priority, even if the rescheduled priority is lower.
-    task === mostRecentlyHoveredLink ? _types.PrefetchPriority.Intent : priority;
-    task.treeAtTimeOfPrefetch = treeAtTimeOfPrefetch;
-    task.fetchStrategy = fetchStrategy;
-    trackMostRecentlyHoveredLink(task);
-    if (task._heapIndex !== -1) {
-        // The task is already in the queue.
-        heapResift(taskHeap, task);
-    } else {
-        heapPush(taskHeap, task);
-    }
-    ensureWorkIsScheduled();
-}
-function isPrefetchTaskDirty(task, nextUrl, tree) {
-    // This is used to quickly bail out of a prefetch task if the result is
-    // guaranteed to not have changed since the task was initiated. This is
-    // strictly an optimization — theoretically, if it always returned true, no
-    // behavior should change because a full prefetch task will effectively
-    // perform the same checks.
-    const currentCacheVersion = (0, _cache.getCurrentCacheVersion)();
-    return task.cacheVersion !== currentCacheVersion || task.treeAtTimeOfPrefetch !== tree || task.key.nextUrl !== nextUrl;
-}
-function trackMostRecentlyHoveredLink(task) {
-    // Track the mostly recently hovered link, i.e. the most recently scheduled
-    // task at Intent priority. There must only be one such task at a time.
-    if (task.priority === _types.PrefetchPriority.Intent && task !== mostRecentlyHoveredLink) {
-        if (mostRecentlyHoveredLink !== null) {
-            // Bump the previously hovered link's priority down to Default.
-            if (mostRecentlyHoveredLink.priority !== _types.PrefetchPriority.Background) {
-                mostRecentlyHoveredLink.priority = _types.PrefetchPriority.Default;
-                heapResift(taskHeap, mostRecentlyHoveredLink);
-            }
-        }
-        mostRecentlyHoveredLink = task;
-    }
-}
-function ensureWorkIsScheduled() {
-    if (didScheduleMicrotask) {
-        // Already scheduled a task to process the queue
-        return;
-    }
-    didScheduleMicrotask = true;
-    scheduleMicrotask(processQueueInMicrotask);
-}
-/**
- * Checks if we've exceeded the maximum number of concurrent prefetch requests,
- * to avoid saturating the browser's internal network queue. This is a
- * cooperative limit — prefetch tasks should check this before issuing
- * new requests.
- *
- * Also checks if we're within the revalidation cooldown window, during which
- * prefetch requests are delayed to allow CDN cache propagation.
- */ function hasNetworkBandwidth(task) {
-    // Check if we're within the revalidation cooldown window
-    if (revalidationCooldownTimeoutHandle !== null) {
-        // We're within the cooldown window. Return false to prevent prefetching.
-        // When the cooldown expires, the timeout will call ensureWorkIsScheduled()
-        // to retry the queue.
-        return false;
-    }
-    // TODO: Also check if there's an in-progress navigation. We should never
-    // add prefetch requests to the network queue if an actual navigation is
-    // taking place, to ensure there's sufficient bandwidth for render-blocking
-    // data and resources.
-    // TODO: Consider reserving some amount of bandwidth for static prefetches.
-    if (task.priority === _types.PrefetchPriority.Intent) {
-        // The most recently hovered link is allowed to exceed the default limit.
-        //
-        // The goal is to always have enough bandwidth to start a new prefetch
-        // request when hovering over a link.
-        //
-        // However, because we don't abort in-progress requests, it's still possible
-        // we'll run out of bandwidth. When links are hovered in quick succession,
-        // there could be multiple hover requests running simultaneously.
-        return inProgressRequests < 12;
-    }
-    // The default limit is lower than the limit for a hovered link.
-    return inProgressRequests < 4;
-}
-function spawnPrefetchSubtask(prefetchSubtask) {
-    // When the scheduler spawns an async task, we don't await its result.
-    // Instead, the async task writes its result directly into the cache, then
-    // pings the scheduler to continue.
-    //
-    // We process server responses streamingly, so the prefetch subtask will
-    // likely resolve before we're finished receiving all the data. The subtask
-    // result includes a promise that resolves once the network connection is
-    // closed. The scheduler uses this to control network bandwidth by tracking
-    // and limiting the number of concurrent requests.
-    inProgressRequests++;
-    return prefetchSubtask.then((result)=>{
-        if (result === null) {
-            // The prefetch task errored before it could start processing the
-            // network stream. Assume the connection is closed.
-            onPrefetchConnectionClosed();
-            return null;
-        }
-        // Wait for the connection to close before freeing up more bandwidth.
-        result.closed.then(onPrefetchConnectionClosed);
-        return result.value;
-    });
-}
-function onPrefetchConnectionClosed() {
-    inProgressRequests--;
-    // Notify the scheduler that we have more bandwidth, and can continue
-    // processing tasks.
-    ensureWorkIsScheduled();
-}
-function pingPrefetchTask(task) {
-    // "Ping" a prefetch that's already in progress to notify it of new data.
-    if (// Check if prefetch was canceled.
-    task.isCanceled || // Check if prefetch is already queued.
-    task._heapIndex !== -1) {
-        return;
-    }
-    // Add the task back to the queue.
-    heapPush(taskHeap, task);
-    ensureWorkIsScheduled();
-}
-function processQueueInMicrotask() {
-    didScheduleMicrotask = false;
-    // We aim to minimize how often we read the current time. Since nearly all
-    // functions in the prefetch scheduler are synchronous, we can read the time
-    // once and pass it as an argument wherever it's needed.
-    const now = Date.now();
-    // Process the task queue until we run out of network bandwidth.
-    let task = heapPeek(taskHeap);
-    while(task !== null && hasNetworkBandwidth(task)){
-        task.cacheVersion = (0, _cache.getCurrentCacheVersion)();
-        const exitStatus = pingRoute(now, task);
-        // These fields are only valid for a single attempt. Reset them after each
-        // iteration of the task queue.
-        const hasBackgroundWork = task.hasBackgroundWork;
-        task.hasBackgroundWork = false;
-        task.spawnedRuntimePrefetches = null;
-        switch(exitStatus){
-            case 0:
-                // The task yielded because there are too many requests in progress.
-                // Stop processing tasks until we have more bandwidth.
-                return;
-            case 1:
-                // The task is blocked. It needs more data before it can proceed.
-                // Keep the task out of the queue until the server responds.
-                heapPop(taskHeap);
-                // Continue to the next task
-                task = heapPeek(taskHeap);
-                continue;
-            case 2:
-                if (task.phase === 1) {
-                    // Finished prefetching the route tree. Proceed to prefetching
-                    // the segments.
-                    task.phase = 0;
-                    heapResift(taskHeap, task);
-                } else if (hasBackgroundWork) {
-                    // The task spawned additional background work. Reschedule the task
-                    // at background priority.
-                    task.priority = _types.PrefetchPriority.Background;
-                    heapResift(taskHeap, task);
-                } else {
-                    // The prefetch is complete. Continue to the next task.
-                    heapPop(taskHeap);
-                }
-                task = heapPeek(taskHeap);
-                continue;
-            default:
-                exitStatus;
-        }
-    }
-}
-/**
- * Check this during a prefetch task to determine if background work can be
- * performed. If so, it evaluates to `true`. Otherwise, it returns `false`,
- * while also scheduling a background task to run later. Usage:
- *
- * @example
- * if (background(task)) {
- *   // Perform background-pri work
- * }
- */ function background(task) {
-    if (task.priority === _types.PrefetchPriority.Background) {
-        return true;
-    }
-    task.hasBackgroundWork = true;
-    return false;
-}
-function pingRoute(now, task) {
-    const key = task.key;
-    const route = (0, _cache.readOrCreateRouteCacheEntry)(now, task, key);
-    const exitStatus = pingRootRouteTree(now, task, route);
-    if (exitStatus !== 0 && key.search !== '') {
-        // If the URL has a non-empty search string, also prefetch the pathname
-        // without the search string. We use the searchless route tree as a base for
-        // optimistic routing; see requestOptimisticRouteCacheEntry for details.
-        //
-        // Note that we don't need to prefetch any of the segment data. Just the
-        // route tree.
-        //
-        // TODO: This is a temporary solution; the plan is to replace this by adding
-        // a wildcard lookup method to the TupleMap implementation. This is
-        // non-trivial to implement because it needs to account for things like
-        // fallback route entries, hence this temporary workaround.
-        const url = new URL(key.pathname, location.origin);
-        const keyWithoutSearch = (0, _cachekey.createCacheKey)(url.href, key.nextUrl);
-        const routeWithoutSearch = (0, _cache.readOrCreateRouteCacheEntry)(now, task, keyWithoutSearch);
-        switch(routeWithoutSearch.status){
-            case _cache.EntryStatus.Empty:
-                {
-                    if (background(task)) {
-                        routeWithoutSearch.status = _cache.EntryStatus.Pending;
-                        spawnPrefetchSubtask((0, _cache.fetchRouteOnCacheMiss)(routeWithoutSearch, task, keyWithoutSearch));
-                    }
-                    break;
-                }
-            case _cache.EntryStatus.Pending:
-            case _cache.EntryStatus.Fulfilled:
-            case _cache.EntryStatus.Rejected:
-                {
-                    break;
-                }
-            default:
-                routeWithoutSearch;
-        }
-    }
-    return exitStatus;
-}
-function pingRootRouteTree(now, task, route) {
-    switch(route.status){
-        case _cache.EntryStatus.Empty:
-            {
-                // Route is not yet cached, and there's no request already in progress.
-                // Spawn a task to request the route, load it into the cache, and ping
-                // the task to continue.
-                // TODO: There are multiple strategies in the <Link> API for prefetching
-                // a route. Currently we've only implemented the main one: per-segment,
-                // static-data only.
-                //
-                // There's also `<Link prefetch={true}>`
-                // which prefetch both static *and* dynamic data.
-                // Similarly, we need to fallback to the old, per-page
-                // behavior if PPR is disabled for a route (via the incremental opt-in).
-                //
-                // Those cases will be handled here.
-                spawnPrefetchSubtask((0, _cache.fetchRouteOnCacheMiss)(route, task, task.key));
-                // If the request takes longer than a minute, a subsequent request should
-                // retry instead of waiting for this one. When the response is received,
-                // this value will be replaced by a new value based on the stale time sent
-                // from the server.
-                // TODO: We should probably also manually abort the fetch task, to reclaim
-                // server bandwidth.
-                route.staleAt = now + 60 * 1000;
-                // Upgrade to Pending so we know there's already a request in progress
-                route.status = _cache.EntryStatus.Pending;
-            // Intentional fallthrough to the Pending branch
-            }
-        case _cache.EntryStatus.Pending:
-            {
-                // Still pending. We can't start prefetching the segments until the route
-                // tree has loaded. Add the task to the set of blocked tasks so that it
-                // is notified when the route tree is ready.
-                const blockedTasks = route.blockedTasks;
-                if (blockedTasks === null) {
-                    route.blockedTasks = new Set([
-                        task
-                    ]);
-                } else {
-                    blockedTasks.add(task);
-                }
-                return 1;
-            }
-        case _cache.EntryStatus.Rejected:
-            {
-                // Route tree failed to load. Treat as a 404.
-                return 2;
-            }
-        case _cache.EntryStatus.Fulfilled:
-            {
-                if (task.phase !== 0) {
-                    // Do not prefetch segment data until we've entered the segment phase.
-                    return 2;
-                }
-                // Recursively fill in the segment tree.
-                if (!hasNetworkBandwidth(task)) {
-                    // Stop prefetching segments until there's more bandwidth.
-                    return 0;
-                }
-                const tree = route.tree;
-                // A task's fetch strategy gets set to `PPR` for any "auto" prefetch.
-                // If it turned out that the route isn't PPR-enabled, we need to use `LoadingBoundary` instead.
-                // We don't need to do this for runtime prefetches, because those are only available in
-                // `cacheComponents`, where every route is PPR.
-                const fetchStrategy = task.fetchStrategy === _types.FetchStrategy.PPR ? route.isPPREnabled ? _types.FetchStrategy.PPR : _types.FetchStrategy.LoadingBoundary : task.fetchStrategy;
-                switch(fetchStrategy){
-                    case _types.FetchStrategy.PPR:
-                        {
-                            // For Cache Components pages, each segment may be prefetched
-                            // statically or using a runtime request, based on various
-                            // configurations and heuristics. We'll do this in two passes: first
-                            // traverse the tree and perform all the static prefetches.
-                            //
-                            // Then, if there are any segments that need a runtime request,
-                            // do another pass to perform a runtime prefetch.
-                            pingStaticHead(now, task, route);
-                            const exitStatus = pingSharedPartOfCacheComponentsTree(now, task, route, task.treeAtTimeOfPrefetch, tree);
-                            if (exitStatus === 0) {
-                                // Child yielded without finishing.
-                                return 0;
-                            }
-                            const spawnedRuntimePrefetches = task.spawnedRuntimePrefetches;
-                            if (spawnedRuntimePrefetches !== null) {
-                                // During the first pass, we discovered segments that require a
-                                // runtime prefetch. Do a second pass to construct a request tree.
-                                const spawnedEntries = new Map();
-                                pingRuntimeHead(now, task, route, spawnedEntries, _types.FetchStrategy.PPRRuntime);
-                                const requestTree = pingRuntimePrefetches(now, task, route, tree, spawnedRuntimePrefetches, spawnedEntries);
-                                let needsDynamicRequest = spawnedEntries.size > 0;
-                                if (needsDynamicRequest) {
-                                    // Perform a dynamic prefetch request and populate the cache with
-                                    // the result.
-                                    spawnPrefetchSubtask((0, _cache.fetchSegmentPrefetchesUsingDynamicRequest)(task, route, _types.FetchStrategy.PPRRuntime, requestTree, spawnedEntries));
-                                }
-                            }
-                            return 2;
-                        }
-                    case _types.FetchStrategy.Full:
-                    case _types.FetchStrategy.PPRRuntime:
-                    case _types.FetchStrategy.LoadingBoundary:
-                        {
-                            // Prefetch multiple segments using a single dynamic request.
-                            // TODO: We can consolidate this branch with previous one by modeling
-                            // it as if the first segment in the new tree has runtime prefetching
-                            // enabled. Will do this as a follow-up refactor. Might want to remove
-                            // the special metatdata case below first. In the meantime, it's not
-                            // really that much duplication, just would be nice to remove one of
-                            // these codepaths.
-                            const spawnedEntries = new Map();
-                            pingRuntimeHead(now, task, route, spawnedEntries, fetchStrategy);
-                            const dynamicRequestTree = diffRouteTreeAgainstCurrent(now, task, route, task.treeAtTimeOfPrefetch, tree, spawnedEntries, fetchStrategy);
-                            let needsDynamicRequest = spawnedEntries.size > 0;
-                            if (needsDynamicRequest) {
-                                spawnPrefetchSubtask((0, _cache.fetchSegmentPrefetchesUsingDynamicRequest)(task, route, fetchStrategy, dynamicRequestTree, spawnedEntries));
-                            }
-                            return 2;
-                        }
-                    default:
-                        fetchStrategy;
-                }
-                break;
-            }
-        default:
-            {
-                route;
-            }
-    }
-    return 2;
-}
-function pingStaticHead(now, task, route) {
-    // The Head data for a page (metadata, viewport) is not really a route
-    // segment, in the sense that it doesn't appear in the route tree. But we
-    // store it in the cache as if it were, using a special key.
-    pingStaticSegmentData(now, task, route, (0, _cache.readOrCreateSegmentCacheEntry)(now, _types.FetchStrategy.PPR, route, route.metadata), task.key, route.metadata);
-}
-function pingRuntimeHead(now, task, route, spawnedEntries, fetchStrategy) {
-    pingRouteTreeAndIncludeDynamicData(now, task, route, route.metadata, false, spawnedEntries, // When prefetching the head, there's no difference between Full
-    // and LoadingBoundary
-    fetchStrategy === _types.FetchStrategy.LoadingBoundary ? _types.FetchStrategy.Full : fetchStrategy);
-}
-// TODO: Rename dynamic -> runtime throughout this module
-function pingSharedPartOfCacheComponentsTree(now, task, route, oldTree, newTree) {
-    // When Cache Components is enabled (or PPR, or a fully static route when PPR
-    // is disabled; those cases are treated equivalently to Cache Components), we
-    // start by prefetching each segment individually. Once we reach the "new"
-    // part of the tree — the part that doesn't exist on the current page — we
-    // may choose to switch to a runtime prefetch instead, based on the
-    // information sent by the server in the route tree.
-    //
-    // The traversal starts in the "shared" part of the tree. Once we reach the
-    // "new" part of the tree, we switch to a different traversal,
-    // pingNewPartOfCacheComponentsTree.
-    // Prefetch this segment's static data.
-    const segment = (0, _cache.readOrCreateSegmentCacheEntry)(now, task.fetchStrategy, route, newTree);
-    pingStaticSegmentData(now, task, route, segment, task.key, newTree);
-    // Recursively ping the children.
-    const oldTreeChildren = oldTree[1];
-    const newTreeChildren = newTree.slots;
-    if (newTreeChildren !== null) {
-        for(const parallelRouteKey in newTreeChildren){
-            if (!hasNetworkBandwidth(task)) {
-                // Stop prefetching segments until there's more bandwidth.
-                return 0;
-            }
-            const newTreeChild = newTreeChildren[parallelRouteKey];
-            const newTreeChildSegment = newTreeChild.segment;
-            const oldTreeChild = oldTreeChildren[parallelRouteKey];
-            const oldTreeChildSegment = oldTreeChild?.[0];
-            let childExitStatus;
-            if (oldTreeChildSegment !== undefined && doesCurrentSegmentMatchCachedSegment(route, newTreeChildSegment, oldTreeChildSegment)) {
-                // We're still in the "shared" part of the tree.
-                childExitStatus = pingSharedPartOfCacheComponentsTree(now, task, route, oldTreeChild, newTreeChild);
-            } else {
-                // We've entered the "new" part of the tree. Switch
-                // traversal functions.
-                childExitStatus = pingNewPartOfCacheComponentsTree(now, task, route, newTreeChild);
-            }
-            if (childExitStatus === 0) {
-                // Child yielded without finishing.
-                return 0;
-            }
-        }
-    }
-    return 2;
-}
-function pingNewPartOfCacheComponentsTree(now, task, route, tree) {
-    // We're now prefetching in the "new" part of the tree, the part that doesn't
-    // exist on the current page. (In other words, we're deeper than the
-    // shared layouts.) Segments in here default to being prefetched statically.
-    // However, if the server instructs us to, we may switch to a runtime
-    // prefetch instead. Traverse the tree and check at each segment.
-    if (tree.hasRuntimePrefetch) {
-        // This route has a runtime prefetch response. Since we're below the shared
-        // layout, everything from this point should be prefetched using a single,
-        // combined runtime request, rather than using per-segment static requests.
-        // This is true even if some of the child segments are known to be fully
-        // static — once we've decided to perform a runtime prefetch, we might as
-        // well respond with the static segments in the same roundtrip. (That's how
-        // regular navigations work, too.) We'll still skip over segments that are
-        // already cached, though.
-        //
-        // It's the server's responsibility to set a reasonable value of
-        // `hasRuntimePrefetch`. Currently it's user-defined, but eventually, the
-        // server may send a value of `false` even if the user opts in, if it
-        // determines during build that the route is always fully static. There are
-        // more optimizations we can do once we implement fallback param
-        // tracking, too.
-        //
-        // Use the task object to collect the segments that need a runtime prefetch.
-        // This will signal to the outer task queue that a second traversal is
-        // required to construct a request tree.
-        if (task.spawnedRuntimePrefetches === null) {
-            task.spawnedRuntimePrefetches = new Set([
-                tree.requestKey
-            ]);
-        } else {
-            task.spawnedRuntimePrefetches.add(tree.requestKey);
-        }
-        // Then exit the traversal without prefetching anything further.
-        return 2;
-    }
-    // This segment should not be runtime prefetched. Prefetch its static data.
-    const segment = (0, _cache.readOrCreateSegmentCacheEntry)(now, task.fetchStrategy, route, tree);
-    pingStaticSegmentData(now, task, route, segment, task.key, tree);
-    if (tree.slots !== null) {
-        if (!hasNetworkBandwidth(task)) {
-            // Stop prefetching segments until there's more bandwidth.
-            return 0;
-        }
-        // Recursively ping the children.
-        for(const parallelRouteKey in tree.slots){
-            const childTree = tree.slots[parallelRouteKey];
-            const childExitStatus = pingNewPartOfCacheComponentsTree(now, task, route, childTree);
-            if (childExitStatus === 0) {
-                // Child yielded without finishing.
-                return 0;
-            }
-        }
-    }
-    // This segment and all its children have finished prefetching.
-    return 2;
-}
-function diffRouteTreeAgainstCurrent(now, task, route, oldTree, newTree, spawnedEntries, fetchStrategy) {
-    // This is a single recursive traversal that does multiple things:
-    // - Finds the parts of the target route (newTree) that are not part of
-    //   of the current page (oldTree) by diffing them, using the same algorithm
-    //   as a real navigation.
-    // - Constructs a request tree (FlightRouterState) that describes which
-    //   segments need to be prefetched and which ones are already cached.
-    // - Creates a set of pending cache entries for the segments that need to
-    //   be prefetched, so that a subsequent prefetch task does not request the
-    //   same segments again.
-    const oldTreeChildren = oldTree[1];
-    const newTreeChildren = newTree.slots;
-    let requestTreeChildren = {};
-    if (newTreeChildren !== null) {
-        for(const parallelRouteKey in newTreeChildren){
-            const newTreeChild = newTreeChildren[parallelRouteKey];
-            const newTreeChildSegment = newTreeChild.segment;
-            const oldTreeChild = oldTreeChildren[parallelRouteKey];
-            const oldTreeChildSegment = oldTreeChild?.[0];
-            if (oldTreeChildSegment !== undefined && doesCurrentSegmentMatchCachedSegment(route, newTreeChildSegment, oldTreeChildSegment)) {
-                // This segment is already part of the current route. Keep traversing.
-                const requestTreeChild = diffRouteTreeAgainstCurrent(now, task, route, oldTreeChild, newTreeChild, spawnedEntries, fetchStrategy);
-                requestTreeChildren[parallelRouteKey] = requestTreeChild;
-            } else {
-                // This segment is not part of the current route. We're entering a
-                // part of the tree that we need to prefetch (unless everything is
-                // already cached).
-                switch(fetchStrategy){
-                    case _types.FetchStrategy.LoadingBoundary:
-                        {
-                            // When PPR is disabled, we can't prefetch per segment. We must
-                            // fallback to the old prefetch behavior and send a dynamic request.
-                            // Only routes that include a loading boundary can be prefetched in
-                            // this way.
-                            //
-                            // This is simlar to a "full" prefetch, but we're much more
-                            // conservative about which segments to include in the request.
-                            //
-                            // The server will only render up to the first loading boundary
-                            // inside new part of the tree. If there's no loading boundary
-                            // anywhere in the tree, the server will never return any data, so
-                            // we can skip the request.
-                            const subtreeHasLoadingBoundary = newTreeChild.hasLoadingBoundary !== _approutertypes.HasLoadingBoundary.SubtreeHasNoLoadingBoundary;
-                            const requestTreeChild = subtreeHasLoadingBoundary ? pingPPRDisabledRouteTreeUpToLoadingBoundary(now, task, route, newTreeChild, null, spawnedEntries) : (0, _cache.convertRouteTreeToFlightRouterState)(newTreeChild);
-                            requestTreeChildren[parallelRouteKey] = requestTreeChild;
-                            break;
-                        }
-                    case _types.FetchStrategy.PPRRuntime:
-                        {
-                            // This is a runtime prefetch. Fetch all cacheable data in the tree,
-                            // not just the static PPR shell.
-                            const requestTreeChild = pingRouteTreeAndIncludeDynamicData(now, task, route, newTreeChild, false, spawnedEntries, fetchStrategy);
-                            requestTreeChildren[parallelRouteKey] = requestTreeChild;
-                            break;
-                        }
-                    case _types.FetchStrategy.Full:
-                        {
-                            // This is a "full" prefetch. Fetch all the data in the tree, both
-                            // static and dynamic. We issue roughly the same request that we
-                            // would during a real navigation. The goal is that once the
-                            // navigation occurs, the router should not have to fetch any
-                            // additional data.
-                            //
-                            // Although the response will include dynamic data, opting into a
-                            // Full prefetch — via <Link prefetch={true}> — implicitly
-                            // instructs the cache to treat the response as "static", or non-
-                            // dynamic, since the whole point is to cache it for
-                            // future navigations.
-                            //
-                            // Construct a tree (currently a FlightRouterState) that represents
-                            // which segments need to be prefetched and which ones are already
-                            // cached. If the tree is empty, then we can exit. Otherwise, we'll
-                            // send the request tree to the server and use the response to
-                            // populate the segment cache.
-                            const requestTreeChild = pingRouteTreeAndIncludeDynamicData(now, task, route, newTreeChild, false, spawnedEntries, fetchStrategy);
-                            requestTreeChildren[parallelRouteKey] = requestTreeChild;
-                            break;
-                        }
-                    default:
-                        fetchStrategy;
-                }
-            }
-        }
-    }
-    const requestTree = [
-        newTree.segment,
-        requestTreeChildren,
-        null,
-        null,
-        newTree.isRootLayout
-    ];
-    return requestTree;
-}
-function pingPPRDisabledRouteTreeUpToLoadingBoundary(now, task, route, tree, refetchMarkerContext, spawnedEntries) {
-    // This function is similar to pingRouteTreeAndIncludeDynamicData, except the
-    // server is only going to return a minimal loading state — it will stop
-    // rendering at the first loading boundary. Whereas a Full prefetch is
-    // intentionally aggressive and tries to pretfetch all the data that will be
-    // needed for a navigation, a LoadingBoundary prefetch is much more
-    // conservative. For example, it will omit from the request tree any segment
-    // that is already cached, regardles of whether it's partial or full. By
-    // contrast, a Full prefetch will refetch partial segments.
-    // "inside-shared-layout" tells the server where to start looking for a
-    // loading boundary.
-    let refetchMarker = refetchMarkerContext === null ? 'inside-shared-layout' : null;
-    const segment = (0, _cache.readOrCreateSegmentCacheEntry)(now, task.fetchStrategy, route, tree);
-    switch(segment.status){
-        case _cache.EntryStatus.Empty:
-            {
-                // This segment is not cached. Add a refetch marker so the server knows
-                // to start rendering here.
-                // TODO: Instead of a "refetch" marker, we could just omit this subtree's
-                // FlightRouterState from the request tree. I think this would probably
-                // already work even without any updates to the server. For consistency,
-                // though, I'll send the full tree and we'll look into this later as part
-                // of a larger redesign of the request protocol.
-                // Add the pending cache entry to the result map.
-                spawnedEntries.set(tree.requestKey, (0, _cache.upgradeToPendingSegment)(segment, // Set the fetch strategy to LoadingBoundary to indicate that the server
-                // might not include it in the pending response. If another route is able
-                // to issue a per-segment request, we'll do that in the background.
-                _types.FetchStrategy.LoadingBoundary));
-                if (refetchMarkerContext !== 'refetch') {
-                    refetchMarker = refetchMarkerContext = 'refetch';
-                } else {
-                // There's already a parent with a refetch marker, so we don't need
-                // to add another one.
-                }
-                break;
-            }
-        case _cache.EntryStatus.Fulfilled:
-            {
-                // The segment is already cached.
-                const segmentHasLoadingBoundary = tree.hasLoadingBoundary === _approutertypes.HasLoadingBoundary.SegmentHasLoadingBoundary;
-                if (segmentHasLoadingBoundary) {
-                    // This segment has a loading boundary, which means the server won't
-                    // render its children. So there's nothing left to prefetch along this
-                    // path. We can bail out.
-                    return (0, _cache.convertRouteTreeToFlightRouterState)(tree);
-                }
-                break;
-            }
-        case _cache.EntryStatus.Pending:
-            {
-                break;
-            }
-        case _cache.EntryStatus.Rejected:
-            {
-                break;
-            }
-        default:
-            segment;
-    }
-    const requestTreeChildren = {};
-    if (tree.slots !== null) {
-        for(const parallelRouteKey in tree.slots){
-            const childTree = tree.slots[parallelRouteKey];
-            requestTreeChildren[parallelRouteKey] = pingPPRDisabledRouteTreeUpToLoadingBoundary(now, task, route, childTree, refetchMarkerContext, spawnedEntries);
-        }
-    }
-    const requestTree = [
-        tree.segment,
-        requestTreeChildren,
-        null,
-        refetchMarker,
-        tree.isRootLayout
-    ];
-    return requestTree;
-}
-function pingRouteTreeAndIncludeDynamicData(now, task, route, tree, isInsideRefetchingParent, spawnedEntries, fetchStrategy) {
-    // The tree we're constructing is the same shape as the tree we're navigating
-    // to. But even though this is a "new" tree, some of the individual segments
-    // may be cached as a result of other route prefetches.
-    //
-    // So we need to find the first uncached segment along each path add an
-    // explicit "refetch" marker so the server knows where to start rendering.
-    // Once the server starts rendering along a path, it keeps rendering the
-    // entire subtree.
-    const segment = (0, _cache.readOrCreateSegmentCacheEntry)(now, // Note that `fetchStrategy` might be different from `task.fetchStrategy`,
-    // and we have to use the former here.
-    // We can have a task with `FetchStrategy.PPR` where some of its segments are configured to
-    // always use runtime prefetching (via `export const prefetch`), and those should check for
-    // entries that include search params.
-    fetchStrategy, route, tree);
-    let spawnedSegment = null;
-    switch(segment.status){
-        case _cache.EntryStatus.Empty:
-            {
-                // This segment is not cached. Include it in the request.
-                spawnedSegment = (0, _cache.upgradeToPendingSegment)(segment, fetchStrategy);
-                break;
-            }
-        case _cache.EntryStatus.Fulfilled:
-            {
-                // The segment is already cached.
-                if (segment.isPartial && (0, _cache.canNewFetchStrategyProvideMoreContent)(segment.fetchStrategy, fetchStrategy)) {
-                    // The cached segment contains dynamic holes, and was prefetched using a less specific strategy than the current one.
-                    // This means we're in one of these cases:
-                    //   - we have a static prefetch, and we're doing a runtime prefetch
-                    //   - we have a static or runtime prefetch, and we're doing a Full prefetch (or a navigation).
-                    // In either case, we need to include it in the request to get a more specific (or full) version.
-                    spawnedSegment = pingFullSegmentRevalidation(now, route, tree, fetchStrategy);
-                }
-                break;
-            }
-        case _cache.EntryStatus.Pending:
-        case _cache.EntryStatus.Rejected:
-            {
-                // There's either another prefetch currently in progress, or the previous
-                // attempt failed. If the new strategy can provide more content, fetch it again.
-                if ((0, _cache.canNewFetchStrategyProvideMoreContent)(segment.fetchStrategy, fetchStrategy)) {
-                    spawnedSegment = pingFullSegmentRevalidation(now, route, tree, fetchStrategy);
-                }
-                break;
-            }
-        default:
-            segment;
-    }
-    const requestTreeChildren = {};
-    if (tree.slots !== null) {
-        for(const parallelRouteKey in tree.slots){
-            const childTree = tree.slots[parallelRouteKey];
-            requestTreeChildren[parallelRouteKey] = pingRouteTreeAndIncludeDynamicData(now, task, route, childTree, isInsideRefetchingParent || spawnedSegment !== null, spawnedEntries, fetchStrategy);
-        }
-    }
-    if (spawnedSegment !== null) {
-        // Add the pending entry to the result map.
-        spawnedEntries.set(tree.requestKey, spawnedSegment);
-    }
-    // Don't bother to add a refetch marker if one is already present in a parent.
-    const refetchMarker = !isInsideRefetchingParent && spawnedSegment !== null ? 'refetch' : null;
-    const requestTree = [
-        tree.segment,
-        requestTreeChildren,
-        null,
-        refetchMarker,
-        tree.isRootLayout
-    ];
-    return requestTree;
-}
-function pingRuntimePrefetches(now, task, route, tree, spawnedRuntimePrefetches, spawnedEntries) {
-    // Construct a request tree (FlightRouterState) for a runtime prefetch. If
-    // a segment is part of the runtime prefetch, the tree is constructed by
-    // diffing against what's already in the prefetch cache. Otherwise, we send
-    // a regular FlightRouterState with no special markers.
-    //
-    // See pingRouteTreeAndIncludeDynamicData for details.
-    if (spawnedRuntimePrefetches.has(tree.requestKey)) {
-        // This segment needs a runtime prefetch.
-        return pingRouteTreeAndIncludeDynamicData(now, task, route, tree, false, spawnedEntries, _types.FetchStrategy.PPRRuntime);
-    }
-    let requestTreeChildren = {};
-    const slots = tree.slots;
-    if (slots !== null) {
-        for(const parallelRouteKey in slots){
-            const childTree = slots[parallelRouteKey];
-            requestTreeChildren[parallelRouteKey] = pingRuntimePrefetches(now, task, route, childTree, spawnedRuntimePrefetches, spawnedEntries);
-        }
-    }
-    // This segment is not part of the runtime prefetch. Clone the base tree.
-    const requestTree = [
-        tree.segment,
-        requestTreeChildren,
-        null,
-        null
-    ];
-    return requestTree;
-}
-function pingStaticSegmentData(now, task, route, segment, routeKey, tree) {
-    switch(segment.status){
-        case _cache.EntryStatus.Empty:
-            // Upgrade to Pending so we know there's already a request in progress
-            spawnPrefetchSubtask((0, _cache.fetchSegmentOnCacheMiss)(route, (0, _cache.upgradeToPendingSegment)(segment, _types.FetchStrategy.PPR), routeKey, tree));
-            break;
-        case _cache.EntryStatus.Pending:
-            {
-                // There's already a request in progress. Depending on what kind of
-                // request it is, we may want to revalidate it.
-                switch(segment.fetchStrategy){
-                    case _types.FetchStrategy.PPR:
-                    case _types.FetchStrategy.PPRRuntime:
-                    case _types.FetchStrategy.Full:
-                        break;
-                    case _types.FetchStrategy.LoadingBoundary:
-                        // There's a pending request, but because it's using the old
-                        // prefetching strategy, we can't be sure if it will be fulfilled by
-                        // the response — it might be inside the loading boundary. Perform
-                        // a revalidation, but because it's speculative, wait to do it at
-                        // background priority.
-                        if (background(task)) {
-                            // TODO: Instead of speculatively revalidating, consider including
-                            // `hasLoading` in the route tree prefetch response.
-                            pingPPRSegmentRevalidation(now, route, routeKey, tree);
-                        }
-                        break;
-                    default:
-                        segment.fetchStrategy;
-                }
-                break;
-            }
-        case _cache.EntryStatus.Rejected:
-            {
-                // The existing entry in the cache was rejected. Depending on how it
-                // was originally fetched, we may or may not want to revalidate it.
-                switch(segment.fetchStrategy){
-                    case _types.FetchStrategy.PPR:
-                    case _types.FetchStrategy.PPRRuntime:
-                    case _types.FetchStrategy.Full:
-                        break;
-                    case _types.FetchStrategy.LoadingBoundary:
-                        // There's a rejected entry, but it was fetched using the loading
-                        // boundary strategy. So the reason it wasn't returned by the server
-                        // might just be because it was inside a loading boundary. Or because
-                        // there was a dynamic rewrite. Revalidate it using the per-
-                        // segment strategy.
-                        //
-                        // Because a rejected segment will definitely prevent the segment (and
-                        // all of its children) from rendering, we perform this revalidation
-                        // immediately instead of deferring it to a background task.
-                        pingPPRSegmentRevalidation(now, route, routeKey, tree);
-                        break;
-                    default:
-                        segment.fetchStrategy;
-                }
-                break;
-            }
-        case _cache.EntryStatus.Fulfilled:
-            break;
-        default:
-            segment;
-    }
-// Segments do not have dependent tasks, so once the prefetch is initiated,
-// there's nothing else for us to do (except write the server data into the
-// entry, which is handled by `fetchSegmentOnCacheMiss`).
-}
-function pingPPRSegmentRevalidation(now, route, routeKey, tree) {
-    const revalidatingSegment = (0, _cache.readOrCreateRevalidatingSegmentEntry)(now, _types.FetchStrategy.PPR, route, tree);
-    switch(revalidatingSegment.status){
-        case _cache.EntryStatus.Empty:
-            // Spawn a prefetch request and upsert the segment into the cache
-            // upon completion.
-            upsertSegmentOnCompletion(spawnPrefetchSubtask((0, _cache.fetchSegmentOnCacheMiss)(route, (0, _cache.upgradeToPendingSegment)(revalidatingSegment, _types.FetchStrategy.PPR), routeKey, tree)), (0, _varypath.getSegmentVaryPathForRequest)(_types.FetchStrategy.PPR, tree));
-            break;
-        case _cache.EntryStatus.Pending:
-            break;
-        case _cache.EntryStatus.Fulfilled:
-        case _cache.EntryStatus.Rejected:
-            break;
-        default:
-            revalidatingSegment;
-    }
-}
-function pingFullSegmentRevalidation(now, route, tree, fetchStrategy) {
-    const revalidatingSegment = (0, _cache.readOrCreateRevalidatingSegmentEntry)(now, fetchStrategy, route, tree);
-    if (revalidatingSegment.status === _cache.EntryStatus.Empty) {
-        // During a Full/PPRRuntime prefetch, a single dynamic request is made for all the
-        // segments that we need. So we don't initiate a request here directly. By
-        // returning a pending entry from this function, it signals to the caller
-        // that this segment should be included in the request that's sent to
-        // the server.
-        const pendingSegment = (0, _cache.upgradeToPendingSegment)(revalidatingSegment, fetchStrategy);
-        upsertSegmentOnCompletion((0, _cache.waitForSegmentCacheEntry)(pendingSegment), (0, _varypath.getSegmentVaryPathForRequest)(fetchStrategy, tree));
-        return pendingSegment;
-    } else {
-        // There's already a revalidation in progress.
-        const nonEmptyRevalidatingSegment = revalidatingSegment;
-        if ((0, _cache.canNewFetchStrategyProvideMoreContent)(nonEmptyRevalidatingSegment.fetchStrategy, fetchStrategy)) {
-            // The existing revalidation was fetched using a less specific strategy.
-            // Reset it and start a new revalidation.
-            const emptySegment = (0, _cache.overwriteRevalidatingSegmentCacheEntry)(fetchStrategy, route, tree);
-            const pendingSegment = (0, _cache.upgradeToPendingSegment)(emptySegment, fetchStrategy);
-            upsertSegmentOnCompletion((0, _cache.waitForSegmentCacheEntry)(pendingSegment), (0, _varypath.getSegmentVaryPathForRequest)(fetchStrategy, tree));
-            return pendingSegment;
-        }
-        switch(nonEmptyRevalidatingSegment.status){
-            case _cache.EntryStatus.Pending:
-                // There's already an in-progress prefetch that includes this segment.
-                return null;
-            case _cache.EntryStatus.Fulfilled:
-            case _cache.EntryStatus.Rejected:
-                // A previous revalidation attempt finished, but we chose not to replace
-                // the existing entry in the cache. Don't try again until or unless the
-                // revalidation entry expires.
-                return null;
-            default:
-                nonEmptyRevalidatingSegment;
-                return null;
-        }
-    }
-}
-const noop = ()=>{};
-function upsertSegmentOnCompletion(promise, varyPath) {
-    // Wait for a segment to finish loading, then upsert it into the cache
-    promise.then((fulfilled)=>{
-        if (fulfilled !== null) {
-            // Received new data. Attempt to replace the existing entry in the cache.
-            (0, _cache.upsertSegmentEntry)(Date.now(), varyPath, fulfilled);
-        }
-    }, noop);
-}
-function doesCurrentSegmentMatchCachedSegment(route, currentSegment, cachedSegment) {
-    if (cachedSegment === _segment.PAGE_SEGMENT_KEY) {
-        // In the FlightRouterState stored by the router, the page segment has the
-        // rendered search params appended to the name of the segment. In the
-        // prefetch cache, however, this is stored separately. So, when comparing
-        // the router's current FlightRouterState to the cached FlightRouterState,
-        // we need to make sure we compare both parts of the segment.
-        // TODO: This is not modeled clearly. We use the same type,
-        // FlightRouterState, for both the CacheNode tree _and_ the prefetch cache
-        // _and_ the server response format, when conceptually those are three
-        // different things and treated in different ways. We should encode more of
-        // this information into the type design so mistakes are less likely.
-        return currentSegment === (0, _segment.addSearchParamsIfPageSegment)(_segment.PAGE_SEGMENT_KEY, Object.fromEntries(new URLSearchParams(route.renderedSearch)));
-    }
-    // Non-page segments are compared using the same function as the server
-    return (0, _matchsegments.matchSegment)(cachedSegment, currentSegment);
-}
-// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-// The remainder of the module is a MinHeap implementation. Try not to put any
-// logic below here unless it's related to the heap algorithm. We can extract
-// this to a separate module if/when we need multiple kinds of heaps.
-// -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
-function compareQueuePriority(a, b) {
-    // Since the queue is a MinHeap, this should return a positive number if b is
-    // higher priority than a, and a negative number if a is higher priority
-    // than b.
-    // `priority` is an integer, where higher numbers are higher priority.
-    const priorityDiff = b.priority - a.priority;
-    if (priorityDiff !== 0) {
-        return priorityDiff;
-    }
-    // If the priority is the same, check which phase the prefetch is in — is it
-    // prefetching the route tree, or the segments? Route trees are prioritized.
-    const phaseDiff = b.phase - a.phase;
-    if (phaseDiff !== 0) {
-        return phaseDiff;
-    }
-    // Finally, check the insertion order. `sortId` is an incrementing counter
-    // assigned to prefetches. We want to process the newest prefetches first.
-    return b.sortId - a.sortId;
-}
-function heapPush(heap, node) {
-    const index = heap.length;
-    heap.push(node);
-    node._heapIndex = index;
-    heapSiftUp(heap, node, index);
-}
-function heapPeek(heap) {
-    return heap.length === 0 ? null : heap[0];
-}
-function heapPop(heap) {
-    if (heap.length === 0) {
-        return null;
-    }
-    const first = heap[0];
-    first._heapIndex = -1;
-    const last = heap.pop();
-    if (last !== first) {
-        heap[0] = last;
-        last._heapIndex = 0;
-        heapSiftDown(heap, last, 0);
-    }
-    return first;
-}
-function heapDelete(heap, node) {
-    const index = node._heapIndex;
-    if (index !== -1) {
-        node._heapIndex = -1;
-        if (heap.length !== 0) {
-            const last = heap.pop();
-            if (last !== node) {
-                heap[index] = last;
-                last._heapIndex = index;
-                heapSiftDown(heap, last, index);
-            }
-        }
-    }
-}
-function heapResift(heap, node) {
-    const index = node._heapIndex;
-    if (index !== -1) {
-        if (index === 0) {
-            heapSiftDown(heap, node, 0);
-        } else {
-            const parentIndex = index - 1 >>> 1;
-            const parent = heap[parentIndex];
-            if (compareQueuePriority(parent, node) > 0) {
-                // The parent is larger. Sift up.
-                heapSiftUp(heap, node, index);
-            } else {
-                // The parent is smaller (or equal). Sift down.
-                heapSiftDown(heap, node, index);
-            }
-        }
-    }
-}
-function heapSiftUp(heap, node, i) {
-    let index = i;
-    while(index > 0){
-        const parentIndex = index - 1 >>> 1;
-        const parent = heap[parentIndex];
-        if (compareQueuePriority(parent, node) > 0) {
-            // The parent is larger. Swap positions.
-            heap[parentIndex] = node;
-            node._heapIndex = parentIndex;
-            heap[index] = parent;
-            parent._heapIndex = index;
-            index = parentIndex;
-        } else {
-            // The parent is smaller. Exit.
-            return;
-        }
-    }
-}
-function heapSiftDown(heap, node, i) {
-    let index = i;
-    const length = heap.length;
-    const halfLength = length >>> 1;
-    while(index < halfLength){
-        const leftIndex = (index + 1) * 2 - 1;
-        const left = heap[leftIndex];
-        const rightIndex = leftIndex + 1;
-        const right = heap[rightIndex];
-        // If the left or right node is smaller, swap with the smaller of those.
-        if (compareQueuePriority(left, node) < 0) {
-            if (rightIndex < length && compareQueuePriority(right, left) < 0) {
-                heap[index] = right;
-                right._heapIndex = index;
-                heap[rightIndex] = node;
-                node._heapIndex = rightIndex;
-                index = rightIndex;
-            } else {
-                heap[index] = left;
-                left._heapIndex = index;
-                heap[leftIndex] = node;
-                node._heapIndex = leftIndex;
-                index = leftIndex;
-            }
-        } else if (rightIndex < length && compareQueuePriority(right, node) < 0) {
-            heap[index] = right;
-            right._heapIndex = index;
-            heap[rightIndex] = node;
-            node._heapIndex = rightIndex;
-            index = rightIndex;
-        } else {
-            // Neither child is smaller. Exit.
-            return;
-        }
-    }
-}
-
-if ((typeof exports.default === 'function' || (typeof exports.default === 'object' && exports.default !== null)) && typeof exports.default.__esModule === 'undefined') {
-  Object.defineProperty(exports.default, '__esModule', { value: true });
-  Object.assign(exports.default, exports);
-  module.exports = exports.default;
-}
-
-//# sourceMappingURL=scheduler.js.map