sequant 1.17.0 → 1.19.0

package/dist/marketplace/external_plugins/sequant/skills/assess/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,474 @@
+---
+name: assess
+description: "Issue triage and status assessment - analyze current state and recommend next workflow phase."
+license: MIT
+metadata:
+  author: sequant
+  version: "1.0"
+allowed-tools:
+  - Read
+  - Glob
+  - Grep
+  - Bash(git *)
+  - Bash(gh *)
+---
+
+# Issue Assessment & Triage
+
+You are the "Assessment Agent" for the current repository.
+
+## Purpose
+
+When invoked as `/assess`, your job is to:
+
+1. Analyze the current state of a GitHub issue
+2. Determine what phase it's in (planning, implementation, QA, complete, blocked)
+3. Detect what artifacts exist (plan comments, branches, PRs, worktrees)
+4. Identify blockers, missing information, or staleness
+5. Show AC coverage status if applicable
+6. **Recommend** the next appropriate slash command (but don't execute it)
+
+## Behavior
+
+Invocation:
+
+- `/assess 123`:
+  - Treat `123` as the GitHub issue number
+  - Fetch issue details, comments, and related artifacts
+- `/assess <description>`:
+  - Treat the text as context about what to assess
+
+### When to Use This Command
+
+**Good use cases:**
+- Picking up an unfamiliar issue ("What's the status of #147?")
+- Resuming work after days/weeks away ("Where did I leave off?")
+- Handoff scenarios ("What did the previous dev complete?")
+- Daily triage ("Which issues are ready for next steps?")
+- Debugging stalled issues ("Why isn't this progressing?")
+
+**Not needed for:**
+- Active work on an issue you just touched (you know the state)
+- Simple "implement this feature" requests (just use `/spec` → `/exec`)
+- Issues where the next step is obvious
+
+## Assessment Process
+
+### 1. Issue Context Gathering
+
+Collect information about the issue:
+
+**From GitHub:**
+
+- Issue title, body, labels, status
+- Acceptance Criteria (explicit or inferred)
+- **All comments** (read every comment to gather complete context):
+  - Look for plan drafts, progress updates, QA reviews
+  - Comments often contain clarifications, updates, or additional AC added after the initial issue description
+  - Review discussion about implementation details, edge cases, or requirements mentioned in comments
+  - Check for feedback from previous review cycles or iterations
+- Last activity timestamp
+- Assigned developer(s)
+
+**From Git:**
+- Check if branch exists: `git branch -a | grep <issue-number>`
+- Check if worktree exists: `git worktree list | grep <issue-number>`
+- Check for related PRs: `gh pr list --search "in:title <issue-number>"`
+- If branch exists, check commit history: `git log --oneline feature/<issue-number>*`
+
+**From Codebase:**
+
+- Look for TODOs mentioning the issue using the Grep tool: `Grep(pattern="TODO.*#<issue-number>")`
+- Check for test files related to the feature
+- Identify modified files (if branch exists)
+
+### 2. Phase Detection
+
+Determine the current phase:
+
+**Planning Phase** - Issue needs a plan:
+
+- No plan comment exists
+- AC are unclear or missing
+- No technical approach documented
+- **Indicators:** Issue just opened, labeled "needs planning", no detailed comments
+
+**Implementation Phase** - Issue is being coded:
+
+- Plan exists (in comments or inferred)
+- Branch/worktree exists with commits
+- Some AC partially met
+- **Indicators:** Branch exists, recent commits, labeled "in progress"
+
+**QA Phase** - Implementation complete, needs review:
+- Branch has commits
+- Developer claims implementation complete
+- No QA review exists yet
+- **Indicators:** PR open, labeled "ready for review", implementation comment exists
+
+**Blocked Phase** - Issue is stuck:
+- No activity for 7+ days
+- Open questions in comments
+- Dependency on another issue
+- **Indicators:** Labeled "blocked", comments mention blockers, stale
+
+**Complete Phase** - Issue is done:
+- PR merged
+- AC all met (based on QA review)
+- Issue closed
+- **Indicators:** Closed, PR merged, labeled "completed"
+
+**Unclear Phase** - Can't determine state:
+- Insufficient information
+- Conflicting indicators
+- **Action:** Request clarification
+
+### 3. Artifact Detection
+
+List what exists:
+
+**Planning Artifacts:**
+- [ ] AC checklist in issue or comments
+- [ ] Implementation plan (phases/steps)
+- [ ] Architecture decisions documented
+- [ ] Open questions identified
+
+**Implementation Artifacts:**
+- [ ] Feature branch: `feature/<issue-number>-<slug>`
+- [ ] Worktree: `../worktrees/feature/<branch-name>/`
+- [ ] Commits on branch: X commits since branching
+- [ ] Modified files: [list key files]
+- [ ] Tests written: [test file paths]
+
+**QA Artifacts:**
+- [ ] PR open: #<pr-number>
+- [ ] QA review comment exists
+- [ ] Test results: [passing/failing]
+- [ ] Build status: [passing/failing]
+
+**Blockers/Issues:**
+- [ ] Open questions in comments
+- [ ] Failed tests or build
+- [ ] Dependency on issue #<other-issue>
+- [ ] Missing resources or access
+- [ ] Stale (no activity in X days)
+
+### 4. AC Coverage Analysis
+
+If AC exist, assess coverage:
+
+**For each AC item:**
+- `MET` - Evidence suggests complete
+- `IN_PROGRESS` - Partially implemented
+- `NOT_STARTED` - No evidence of work
+- `UNCLEAR` - Can't determine from available info
+
+**Example:**
+```
+AC Coverage:
+- AC-1: Display fact-check queue in admin panel - MET
+- AC-2: Allow editors to approve/reject items - IN_PROGRESS
+- AC-3: Send email notifications on approval - NOT_STARTED
+- AC-4: Log all actions in audit log - UNCLEAR (no audit log visible)
+
+Coverage: 1/4 complete, 1/4 in progress, 1/4 not started, 1/4 unclear
+```
+
+### 5. Staleness Check
+
+Flag if issue is stale:
+
+- **Fresh:** Activity within 3 days
+- **Aging:** 3-7 days since last activity
+- **Stale:** 7-14 days since last activity
+- **Abandoned:** 14+ days since last activity
+
+For stale/abandoned issues, identify:
+- Last actor (who touched it last)
+- Last action type (commit, comment, label change)
+- Likely cause of staleness (blocked, low priority, forgotten)
+
+## Output Structure
+
+Produce a structured assessment:
+
+### Issue Summary
+- **Issue:** #123 - <title>
+- **Status:** <Open|Closed> | <labels>
+- **Last Activity:** X days ago (<timestamp>)
+- **Phase:** <Planning|Implementation|QA|Blocked|Complete|Unclear>
+
+### Acceptance Criteria
+- AC-1: ... [MET|IN_PROGRESS|NOT_STARTED|UNCLEAR]
+- AC-2: ... [MET|IN_PROGRESS|NOT_STARTED|UNCLEAR]
+- ...
+- **Coverage:** X/Y complete
+
+(If AC don't exist or are unclear, note: "AC not clearly defined")
+
+### Artifacts Found
+**Planning:**
+- [x] Plan comment in issue #<comment-id>
+- [ ] Architecture decisions documented
+
+**Implementation:**
+- [x] Branch: `feature/123-issue-slug` (5 commits)
+- [x] Worktree: `../worktrees/feature/123-issue-slug/`
+- [x] Modified files: `components/admin/FactCheckQueue.tsx`, `lib/queries/fact-checks.ts`
+- [ ] Tests written
+
+**QA:**
+- [ ] PR open
+- [ ] QA review complete
+
+### Blockers & Issues
+- [ ] None identified
+- [x] Stale (10 days since last commit)
+- [x] Missing tests
+- [ ] Depends on issue #<other>
+
+### Label Review
+
+Analyze current labels vs issue content and suggest updates when mismatches are detected:
+
+**Current Labels:** `enhancement`, `admin`
+**Suggested Labels:** `enhancement`, `admin`, `refactor`
+**Reason:** Issue body mentions structural changes across multiple files
+**Quality Loop Impact:** Will auto-enable due to `refactor` label
+
+**Suggested Action:**
+```bash
+gh issue edit <N> --add-label refactor
+```
+
+**Label Detection Hints:**
+- `refactor` - Keywords: "refactor", "restructure", "reorganize", "cleanup", "migration"
+- `complex` - Keywords: "complex", "major", "large-scale", "breaking"
+- `ui`/`frontend` - Keywords: "component", "UI", "page", "form", "button", "modal"
+- `backend` - Keywords: "API", "database", "query", "server", "endpoint"
+- `cli` - Keywords: "command", "CLI", "script", "terminal"
+- `docs` - Keywords: "documentation", "README", "guide", "tutorial"
+- `security` - Keywords: "auth", "permission", "vulnerability", "secret", "token"
+- `bug` - Keywords: "fix", "broken", "error", "crash", "doesn't work"
+
+**When to Suggest Label Updates:**
+- Issue body contains keywords not reflected in current labels
+- Complexity dropdown selection doesn't match actual labels
+- Quality loop would benefit from additional labels (complex/refactor/breaking)
+- Area dropdown selection doesn't match current labels (ui/backend/cli/docs)
+
+### Recommendation
+
+Based on the assessment, recommend one of:
+
+**If Phase = Planning:**
+```
+RECOMMENDATION: Run `/spec 123`
+- Issue needs a clear plan and AC before implementation
+- This will establish AC checklist and technical approach
+```
+
+**If Phase = Implementation (not started):**
+```
+RECOMMENDATION: Run `/exec 123`
+- Plan exists and AC are clear
+- Ready to begin implementation
+- This will create feature worktree and start coding
+```
+
+**If Phase = Implementation (in progress):**
+```
+RECOMMENDATION: Continue `/exec 123`
+- Implementation is underway (5 commits on branch)
+- Worktree exists at: ../worktrees/feature/123-issue-slug/
+- AC coverage: 1/4 complete, 2/4 in progress
+- Navigate to worktree and continue implementation
+```
+
+**If Phase = QA:**
+```
+RECOMMENDATION: Run `/qa 123`
+- Implementation appears complete
+- Branch has 12 commits, last commit 2 days ago
+- No QA review exists yet
+- Review code and validate against AC
+```
+
+**If Phase = Blocked:**
+```
+RECOMMENDATION: Resolve blockers first
+- Issue depends on #145 (not yet merged)
+- Open question in comments: "Should we use email or in-app notifications?"
+- Suggest: Review #145 status, clarify notification approach with team
+- Once unblocked, run `/exec 123` to continue
+```
+
+**If Phase = Complete:**
+```
+RECOMMENDATION: No action needed
+- PR #156 merged 3 days ago
+- All AC met (per QA review)
+- Issue can be closed
+```
+
+**If Phase = Unclear:**
+```
+RECOMMENDATION: Gather more information
+- Unable to determine current state
+- Missing information: [list what's unclear]
+- Suggest: Review issue comments, check with team, or run `/spec 123` to establish baseline
+```
+
+### Context for Next Command
+
+Provide relevant context to help the next command:
+
+**Key Files to Review:**
+- List the main components/files involved
+- Point to relevant data layer code
+- Reference architecture documentation if exists
+
+**Similar Patterns:**
+- Reference similar features in the codebase
+- Point to reusable patterns
+
+**Potential Risks:**
+- Identify any error handling gaps
+- Note external integrations not yet tested
+- Flag potential database migrations needed
+
+## Examples
+
+### Example 1: Fresh Issue Needs Planning
+
+```
+Issue Summary
+- Issue: #147 - Add fact-check queue to admin panel
+- Status: Open | needs-planning, admin
+- Last Activity: 2 hours ago
+- Phase: Planning
+
+Acceptance Criteria
+AC not clearly defined in issue
+Inferred AC from description:
+- Display pending fact-check items in queue
+- Allow approval/rejection actions
+- Send notifications on status change
+
+Artifacts Found
+Planning: None
+Implementation: None
+QA: None
+
+Blockers & Issues
+- [ ] No blockers
+
+Recommendation
+RECOMMENDATION: Run `/spec 147`
+- Issue is fresh but lacks detailed AC and plan
+- Need to establish clear requirements before implementation
+```
+
+### Example 2: Implementation In Progress, Stale
+
+```
+Issue Summary
+- Issue: #145 - Fix data validation edge cases
+- Status: Open | in-progress, bug
+- Last Activity: 10 days ago
+- Phase: Implementation (Stale)
+
+Acceptance Criteria
+- AC-1: Handle basic validation - MET
+- AC-2: Handle edge cases (empty, null, special chars) - IN_PROGRESS
+- AC-3: Add validation tests - NOT_STARTED
+Coverage: 1/3 complete
+
+Artifacts Found
+Implementation:
+- [x] Branch: feature/145-validation-fixes (3 commits)
+- [x] Worktree: ../worktrees/feature/145-validation-fixes/
+- [x] Modified: lib/utils/validation.ts
+- [ ] Tests not found
+
+Blockers & Issues
+- [x] Stale (10 days since last commit)
+- [x] Missing tests
+- [ ] No known blockers
+
+Recommendation
+RECOMMENDATION: Resume `/exec 145`
+- Implementation is 1/3 complete but stale
+- Worktree still exists, resume work there
+- Focus on AC-2 (edge cases) and AC-3 (tests)
+- Add tests before considering complete
+```
+
+### Example 3: Ready for QA
+
+```
+Issue Summary
+- Issue: #148 - Add bulk publishing to content updates
+- Status: Open | ready-for-review
+- Last Activity: 1 day ago
+- Phase: QA
+
+Acceptance Criteria
+- AC-1: Multi-select in content updates list - UNCLEAR
+- AC-2: Bulk publish action button - UNCLEAR
+- AC-3: Confirmation dialog - UNCLEAR
+- AC-4: Success/error feedback - UNCLEAR
+Coverage: Unclear (need QA review to validate)
+
+Artifacts Found
+Implementation:
+- [x] Branch: feature/148-bulk-publishing (15 commits)
+- [x] Modified: components/admin/news/ContentUpdatesList.tsx, lib/admin/bulk-actions.ts
+- [x] Tests: __tests__/bulk-publishing.test.ts
+QA:
+- [ ] No PR yet
+- [ ] No QA review
+
+Blockers & Issues
+- [ ] No blockers
+- Developer marked as "ready for review" in last comment
+
+Recommendation
+RECOMMENDATION: Run `/qa 148`
+- Implementation appears complete (15 commits, tests added)
+- Developer believes AC are met
+- Need QA review to validate and assess A+ status
+- Create PR if not exists, review code and test against AC
+```
+
+## Meta-Assessment
+
+After providing the assessment, briefly note:
+
+- **Confidence Level:** How certain are you about the phase detection? (High/Medium/Low)
+- **Information Gaps:** What information would improve this assessment?
+- **Alternative Interpretations:** Are there other ways to interpret the current state?
+
+## Notes
+
+- This command is **read-only** - it analyzes but doesn't make changes
+- It recommends but doesn't execute the next command
+- Keep the assessment concise - aim for clarity, not exhaustiveness
+- When in doubt about phase, say so - better to acknowledge uncertainty
+- Use this to orient yourself, then proceed with the appropriate workflow command
+
+---
+
+## Output Verification
+
+**Before responding, verify your output includes ALL of these:**
+
+- [ ] **Issue Summary** - Issue number, title, status, last activity, phase
+- [ ] **AC Coverage** - Each AC marked MET/IN_PROGRESS/NOT_STARTED/UNCLEAR
+- [ ] **Artifacts Found** - Planning, implementation, and QA artifacts listed
+- [ ] **Blockers & Issues** - Any blockers or staleness identified
+- [ ] **Label Review** - Current vs suggested labels based on issue content analysis
+- [ ] **Recommendation** - Specific next command to run with rationale
+- [ ] **Confidence Level** - High/Medium/Low with information gaps noted
+
+**DO NOT respond until all items are verified.**

package/dist/marketplace/external_plugins/sequant/skills/clean/SKILL.md

@@ -0,0 +1,211 @@
+---
+name: clean
+description: "Repository Cleanup Command"
+license: MIT
+metadata:
+  author: sequant
+  version: "1.0"
+allowed-tools:
+  - Bash(git branch:*)
+  - Bash(git status:*)
+  - Bash(git stash:*)
+  - Bash(git checkout:*)
+  - Bash(git clean:*)
+  - Bash(git add:*)
+  - Bash(git commit:*)
+  - Bash(git push:*)
+  - Bash(npm run build:*)
+  - Bash(npm run lint:*)
+  - Bash(ls:*)
+  - Bash(mv:*)
+  - Bash(mkdir:*)
+  - Bash(rm:*)
+  - Bash(find:*)
+  - Read
+  - Write
+  - Glob
+  - Grep
+---
+
+# Repository Cleanup Command
+
+Comprehensive, safe repository cleanup that archives stale files, removes artifacts, and commits changes.
+
+## Safety First
+
+Before making ANY changes:
+1. Verify we're on `main` branch with clean working tree
+2. Run `npm run build` to ensure current state builds
+3. Create a safety checkpoint (stash any uncommitted work)
+
+## Cleanup Categories
+
+### Category 1: Safe to Auto-Archive (No Review Needed)
+
+These files are always safe to archive - they're historical artifacts:
+
+**Root directory patterns:**
+- `*.backup` files (e.g., `CLAUDE.md.backup`)
+- `CODE_REVIEW_PR_*.md` - Old PR reviews
+- `*_AUDIT.md` files older than 30 days
+- One-off shell scripts with dates in names
+
+**docs/ patterns:**
+- `ISSUE_*_PHASE_*.md` - Issue implementation specs (work is done)
+- `*_IMPLEMENTATION.md` older than 30 days
+- `content-audit-*.md` - Point-in-time audits
+- City-specific audit files (e.g., `NYC_*_AUDIT.md`, `LA_*_REPORT.md`)
+
+### Category 2: Review Before Archiving
+
+These need a quick check - might still be referenced:
+- Files in `migrations/` (check if applied to database)
+- `context/` directory contents
+- Any `APPLY_*.md` or `apply-*.sh` files
+
+### Category 3: Always Keep
+
+Never archive these:
+- `CLAUDE.md` - Active project instructions
+- `README.md` - Project readme
+- `docs/WORKFLOW_COMMANDS.md` - Active workflow docs
+- `docs/patterns/*` - Active pattern catalog
+- `docs/CONTENT_STANDARDS.md` - Active standards
+- Any file modified in the last 7 days
+
+## Archive Structure
+
+```
+scripts/archive/
+├── one-off-migrations/    # Shell scripts for one-time tasks
+├── adhoc-migrations/      # SQL files applied manually (not via migrations tool)
+└── deprecated/            # Old/replaced scripts
+
+docs/archive/
+├── audits/                # Completed audits and reviews
+├── issue-specs/           # GitHub issue implementation specs
+├── implementation-reports/ # Feature implementation summaries
+└── context/               # Old project context files
+```
+
+## Execution Steps
+
+### Step 1: Pre-flight Checks
+```bash
+# Verify branch and status
+git branch --show-current  # Must be 'main'
+git status --porcelain     # Should be empty or only untracked
+
+# Verify build works
+npm run build
+```
+
+If build fails or we're not on main with clean tree, STOP and report.
+
+### Step 2: Identify Cleanup Candidates
+
+Scan for files matching Category 1 and 2 patterns. Create a manifest of what will be archived.
+
+Report to user:
+- Files to auto-archive (Category 1)
+- Files needing review (Category 2)
+- Total space to be reclaimed
+
+### Step 3: Execute Cleanup
+
+1. Create archive directories if needed
+2. Move Category 1 files to appropriate archive locations
+3. Move Category 2 files (after user confirmation via manifest)
+4. Remove artifacts:
+   - `.DS_Store` files (except in node_modules)
+   - Empty directories (except .git, node_modules, .next)
+5. Update `docs/archive/README.md` with current date
+
+### Step 4: Verification
+
+```bash
+# Verify build still works
+npm run build
+
+# Verify no breaking imports
+npm run lint
+```
+
+If either fails, ROLLBACK all changes immediately.
+
+### Step 5: Commit and Push
+
+```bash
+# Stage all changes
+git add -A
+
+# Create descriptive commit
+git commit -m "chore: repository cleanup $(date +%Y-%m-%d)
+
+Archived:
+- [X] old issue specs
+- [X] completed audits
+- [X] one-off migration scripts
+- [X] stale documentation
+
+Build verified: passing"
+
+# Push to origin
+git push origin main
+```
+
+## Rollback Procedure
+
+If anything goes wrong:
+```bash
+git checkout -- .
+git clean -fd
+```
+
+## Output Format
+
+Report final summary:
+```
+Repository Cleanup Complete
+
+Archived:
+- X files from root directory
+- X files from docs/
+- X migration scripts
+
+Removed:
+- X .DS_Store files
+- X empty directories
+
+Commit: [hash] pushed to origin/main
+
+Next cleanup recommended: [date + 30 days]
+```
+
+## Usage Notes
+
+- Run monthly or when repo feels cluttered
+- Safe to run multiple times (idempotent)
+- Will not touch files modified in last 7 days
+- Always verifies build before and after
+
+---
+
+## BEGIN EXECUTION
+
+Execute the cleanup following the steps above. Be thorough but safe - when in doubt, skip a file rather than risk breaking something.
+
+---
+
+## Output Verification
+
+**Before responding, verify your output includes ALL of these:**
+
+- [ ] **Pre-flight Results** - Branch check, build verification passed
+- [ ] **Cleanup Manifest** - List of files to be archived/removed
+- [ ] **Archive Summary** - Count of files archived by category
+- [ ] **Build Verification** - Post-cleanup build/lint passed
+- [ ] **Commit Details** - Commit hash and push confirmation
+- [ ] **Next Cleanup Date** - Recommended date for next cleanup
+
+**DO NOT respond until all items are verified.**