seo 0.0.15 → 0.1.0

This diff represents the content of publicly available package versions that have been released to one of the supported registries. The information contained in this diff is provided for informational purposes only and reflects changes between package versions as they appear in their respective public registries.
Files changed (146) hide show
  1. package/LICENSE +201 -0
  2. package/PRIVACY.md +95 -0
  3. package/README.md +338 -35
  4. package/SECURITY.md +55 -0
  5. package/TERMS.md +94 -0
  6. package/TRADEMARKS.md +27 -0
  7. package/dist/cli.js +125 -0
  8. package/dist/cli.js.map +1 -0
  9. package/dist/dist-CSY2_p-j.js +713 -0
  10. package/dist/dist-CSY2_p-j.js.map +1 -0
  11. package/dist/dist-FeAUNn9A.js +3 -0
  12. package/dist/index.d.ts +17921 -0
  13. package/dist/index.js +26769 -0
  14. package/dist/index.js.map +1 -0
  15. package/dist/mcp.d.ts +57 -0
  16. package/dist/mcp.js +26744 -0
  17. package/dist/mcp.js.map +1 -0
  18. package/dist/package-uzXzqDW6.js +23818 -0
  19. package/dist/package-uzXzqDW6.js.map +1 -0
  20. package/package.json +101 -23
  21. package/skills/README.md +81 -0
  22. package/skills/affected-urls/SKILL.md +39 -0
  23. package/skills/affected-urls/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  24. package/skills/ai-readiness/SKILL.md +34 -0
  25. package/skills/ai-readiness/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  26. package/skills/ai-referrals/SKILL.md +31 -0
  27. package/skills/ai-referrals/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  28. package/skills/audit-page/SKILL.md +50 -0
  29. package/skills/audit-page/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  30. package/skills/audit-urls/SKILL.md +39 -0
  31. package/skills/audit-urls/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  32. package/skills/cannibalisation/SKILL.md +31 -0
  33. package/skills/cannibalisation/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  34. package/skills/community-intent/SKILL.md +39 -0
  35. package/skills/community-intent/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  36. package/skills/compare-crawls/SKILL.md +40 -0
  37. package/skills/compare-crawls/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  38. package/skills/content-optimization/SKILL.md +31 -0
  39. package/skills/content-optimization/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  40. package/skills/crawl-diff/SKILL.md +51 -0
  41. package/skills/crawl-diff/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  42. package/skills/crawl-history/SKILL.md +37 -0
  43. package/skills/crawl-history/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  44. package/skills/crawl-report/SKILL.md +37 -0
  45. package/skills/crawl-report/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  46. package/skills/crawler-rules/SKILL.md +34 -0
  47. package/skills/crawler-rules/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  48. package/skills/ctr-underperformers/SKILL.md +31 -0
  49. package/skills/ctr-underperformers/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  50. package/skills/decaying-pages/SKILL.md +31 -0
  51. package/skills/decaying-pages/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  52. package/skills/entity-readiness/SKILL.md +34 -0
  53. package/skills/entity-readiness/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  54. package/skills/explain-crawl-issue/SKILL.md +32 -0
  55. package/skills/explain-crawl-issue/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  56. package/skills/generate-llms-txt/SKILL.md +37 -0
  57. package/skills/generate-llms-txt/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  58. package/skills/geo-gaps/SKILL.md +37 -0
  59. package/skills/geo-gaps/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  60. package/skills/index-coverage/SKILL.md +84 -0
  61. package/skills/index-coverage/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  62. package/skills/index-coverage-plan/SKILL.md +50 -0
  63. package/skills/index-coverage-plan/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  64. package/skills/index-monitor/SKILL.md +49 -0
  65. package/skills/index-monitor/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  66. package/skills/index-watch/SKILL.md +77 -0
  67. package/skills/index-watch/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  68. package/skills/internal-links/SKILL.md +31 -0
  69. package/skills/internal-links/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  70. package/skills/link-recovery/SKILL.md +51 -0
  71. package/skills/link-recovery/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  72. package/skills/llms-txt-audit/SKILL.md +34 -0
  73. package/skills/llms-txt-audit/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  74. package/skills/measure-change/SKILL.md +52 -0
  75. package/skills/measure-change/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  76. package/skills/monthly-action-plan/SKILL.md +50 -0
  77. package/skills/monthly-action-plan/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  78. package/skills/monthly-report/SKILL.md +50 -0
  79. package/skills/monthly-report/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  80. package/skills/narrative-report/SKILL.md +51 -0
  81. package/skills/narrative-report/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  82. package/skills/okf-build/SKILL.md +39 -0
  83. package/skills/okf-build/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  84. package/skills/okf-validate/SKILL.md +43 -0
  85. package/skills/okf-validate/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  86. package/skills/page-opportunities/SKILL.md +31 -0
  87. package/skills/page-opportunities/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  88. package/skills/performance/SKILL.md +50 -0
  89. package/skills/performance/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  90. package/skills/performance-audit/SKILL.md +31 -0
  91. package/skills/performance-audit/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  92. package/skills/pseo-audit/SKILL.md +103 -0
  93. package/skills/pseo-audit/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  94. package/skills/query-clusters/SKILL.md +31 -0
  95. package/skills/query-clusters/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  96. package/skills/quick-wins/SKILL.md +31 -0
  97. package/skills/quick-wins/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  98. package/skills/redirect-trace/SKILL.md +51 -0
  99. package/skills/redirect-trace/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  100. package/skills/refresh-priorities/SKILL.md +48 -0
  101. package/skills/refresh-priorities/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  102. package/skills/search-performance-overview/SKILL.md +48 -0
  103. package/skills/search-performance-overview/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  104. package/skills/second-page/SKILL.md +50 -0
  105. package/skills/second-page/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  106. package/skills/segment-impact/SKILL.md +50 -0
  107. package/skills/segment-impact/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  108. package/skills/seo/SKILL.md +74 -0
  109. package/skills/seo/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  110. package/skills/seo-fix-queue/SKILL.md +50 -0
  111. package/skills/seo-fix-queue/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  112. package/skills/seo-geo-readiness/SKILL.md +60 -0
  113. package/skills/seo-geo-readiness/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  114. package/skills/seo-site-audit/SKILL.md +59 -0
  115. package/skills/seo-site-audit/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  116. package/skills/seo-to-ai-query/SKILL.md +31 -0
  117. package/skills/seo-to-ai-query/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  118. package/skills/setup-check/SKILL.md +49 -0
  119. package/skills/setup-check/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  120. package/skills/site-crawl/SKILL.md +39 -0
  121. package/skills/site-crawl/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  122. package/skills/striking-distance/SKILL.md +52 -0
  123. package/skills/striking-distance/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  124. package/skills/technical-watch/SKILL.md +49 -0
  125. package/skills/technical-watch/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  126. package/skills/top-fixes/SKILL.md +38 -0
  127. package/skills/top-fixes/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  128. package/skills/traffic-anomaly/SKILL.md +52 -0
  129. package/skills/traffic-anomaly/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  130. package/skills/update-correlation/SKILL.md +51 -0
  131. package/skills/update-correlation/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  132. package/skills/update-postmortem/SKILL.md +49 -0
  133. package/skills/update-postmortem/agents/openai.yaml +4 -0
  134. package/.jshintrc +0 -18
  135. package/.npmignore +0 -3
  136. package/.travis.yml +0 -3
  137. package/Makefile +0 -10
  138. package/index.js +0 -2
  139. package/lib/middleware.js +0 -159
  140. package/lib/seo.js +0 -32
  141. package/test/init.js +0 -43
  142. package/test/middleware.test.js +0 -111
  143. package/test/seo-page-result.html +0 -9
  144. package/test/seo-page.html +0 -9
  145. package/test/seo-routes.js +0 -5
  146. package/test/vendor/jquery-1.11.1.min.js +0 -4
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: seo-geo-readiness
3
+ description: Audit local technical eligibility evidence and supporting website observations for AI search with seo. Use when the user asks about ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews, LLM citations, llms.txt, structured data, authorship, or AI-search visibility.
4
+ ---
5
+
6
+ # GEO readiness
7
+
8
+ This workflow measures technical readiness and referral evidence. It does not
9
+ prove that an AI product cites the site.
10
+
11
+ ## Run the readiness report
12
+
13
+ Create a saved crawl, then analyze the same report:
14
+
15
+ ```bash
16
+ seo crawl --project <project> --max-pages 500 --save --json
17
+ seo ai-readiness --project <project> --json
18
+ ```
19
+
20
+ Through MCP, use `seo_run_report` with report id `ai-readiness`. Use report id
21
+ `geo-gaps` when exact affected URLs for crawl and indexability rules are
22
+ needed. Call `seo_describe_report` before a report when its parameters are not
23
+ already known.
24
+
25
+ 1. Check `dataStatus`, `summary.pageLimitReached`, warnings, and caveats.
26
+ 2. Separate failed technical checks from contextual observations.
27
+ 3. Treat local crawl indexability as local evidence. It does not prove that
28
+ Google indexed the URL.
29
+ 4. Use bounded URL Inspection evidence when Google's indexed snapshot changes
30
+ the decision. It is not a live crawl or a sitewide sample.
31
+
32
+ ## Explain the evidence
33
+
34
+ - Blocked crawling, publisher `noindex`, snippet restrictions, and non-success
35
+ HTML responses can prevent or limit technical eligibility.
36
+ - Structured data, semantic HTML, authorship, and dates are contextual
37
+ observations. Recommend them only for a documented user or Search feature
38
+ need.
39
+ - Paragraph shape, lists, tables, and question headings do not prove quality or
40
+ citation likelihood.
41
+ - Do not recommend content chunking or a minimum word count solely for AI
42
+ Search.
43
+ - `/llms.txt` is optional metadata for agents that support it. The report does
44
+ not treat it as a Google Search ranking signal.
45
+
46
+ Useful follow-up reports remain structured for agents:
47
+
48
+ ```bash
49
+ seo seo-to-ai-query --project <project> --json
50
+ seo ai-referrals --project <project> --json
51
+ seo llms audit --project <project> --json
52
+ ```
53
+
54
+ `seo-to-ai-query` creates deterministic monitoring-prompt suggestions from
55
+ retained GSC wording. These are not observed AI queries. `ai-referrals` reports
56
+ known GA4 referral evidence and cannot measure citations without a referral.
57
+
58
+ Report `nosnippet`, `max-snippet:0`, positive `max-snippet` limits, and
59
+ unrestricted `max-snippet:-1` exactly. No detected page-level restriction does
60
+ not guarantee that Google will select or show the page.
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
1
+ interface:
2
+ display_name: "SEO GEO readiness"
3
+ short_description: "Review local AI-search readiness evidence"
4
+ default_prompt: "Use $seo-geo-readiness to review this site's AI-search readiness without overstating citations or visibility."
@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: seo-site-audit
3
+ description: Run an evidence-backed site audit with the seo main report, crawler, and focused follow-up reports. Use when the user asks to audit or diagnose a website across Search Console performance, technical SEO, indexability, metadata, schema, internal linking, security, performance, or AI-search readiness.
4
+ ---
5
+
6
+ # SEO site audit
7
+
8
+ Start with the main report. It joins the available first-party evidence and
9
+ returns a small set of follow-up commands.
10
+
11
+ Through MCP, call `seo_run_report` with report id
12
+ `search-performance-overview`. Call `seo_describe_report` first when its
13
+ parameters are not already known. Use the CLI when MCP is not available:
14
+
15
+ ```bash
16
+ seo report --project <project> --json
17
+ seo report --site sc-domain:example.com --json
18
+ ```
19
+
20
+ ## Read the main report
21
+
22
+ 1. Check `dataStatus`, source completeness, skipped sections, warnings, and
23
+ caveats before interpreting findings.
24
+ 2. Read the narrative and priority queue against their evidence references.
25
+ 3. Use `nextCommands` to choose a small number of follow-ups. Do not run every
26
+ report by default.
27
+ 4. Keep missing, unavailable, filtered, partial, capped, and complete evidence
28
+ separate. A partial source cannot support an all-clear.
29
+
30
+ ## Add technical crawl evidence
31
+
32
+ Run a crawl when the user asks for technical coverage or the main report
33
+ identifies a technical evidence gap:
34
+
35
+ ```bash
36
+ seo crawl --project <project> --max-pages 500 --save --json
37
+ seo crawl https://example.com --max-pages 500 --save --json
38
+ ```
39
+
40
+ Read `summary`, `topFixes`, `warnings`, and `caveats` first. Check
41
+ `summary.pageLimitReached` before making sitewide claims. Reuse the saved report
42
+ for detail instead of crawling again:
43
+
44
+ - Report id `top-fixes` returns a bounded queue.
45
+ - Report id `affected-urls` returns URLs for one rule.
46
+ - Report id `explain-crawl-issue` explains an unfamiliar rule.
47
+ - Report id `crawl-report` returns requested report detail.
48
+
49
+ Use report id `performance-audit` for a selected URL when performance evidence
50
+ is needed. A crawl does not replace Lighthouse lab data or CrUX field data.
51
+
52
+ ## Present the result
53
+
54
+ Give the user the top three to five evidence-backed actions, affected areas,
55
+ and a verification command for each action. Name every material gap or cap.
56
+
57
+ Never invent clicks, sessions, rankings, issue counts, indexing state, or
58
+ sitewide health. Keep advice structural and diagnostic unless the user asks
59
+ for copy.
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
1
+ interface:
2
+ display_name: "SEO site audit"
3
+ short_description: "Audit a site with report and crawl evidence"
4
+ default_prompt: "Use $seo-site-audit to audit this site and return a bounded evidence-backed action plan."
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: seo-to-ai-query
3
+ description: Convert retained GSC query wording into deterministic AI monitoring prompts; use when an agent needs a reproducible prompt seed set without claiming observed AI demand or visibility.
4
+ ---
5
+
6
+ # Queries to AI prompts
7
+
8
+ Use this report to turn first-party GSC query wording into a bounded set of prompts for later manual or automated monitoring. Each source query keeps its clicks, impressions, CTR, and average position, while deterministic templates produce stable prompt suggestions. The output is useful for designing a monitoring corpus. It is not evidence that anyone entered those prompts into an AI product, that an answer mentioned the site, or that the source query has equivalent AI demand.
9
+
10
+ ## Run the report
11
+
12
+ Use the compact MCP flow:
13
+
14
+ 1. Call `seo_list_reports` with `{"category":"ai-search"}`.
15
+ 2. Call `seo_describe_report` with `{"id":"seo-to-ai-query"}`.
16
+ 3. Call `seo_run_report` with `{"id":"seo-to-ai-query","params":{"site":"sc-domain:example.com","days":90,"limit":20,"minImpressions":100,"maxRows":10000}}`.
17
+
18
+ The CLI uses the same registry entry:
19
+
20
+ ```sh
21
+ seo reports describe seo-to-ai-query --json
22
+ seo reports run seo-to-ai-query --params '{"site":"sc-domain:example.com","days":90,"limit":20,"minImpressions":100,"maxRows":10000}' --json
23
+ ```
24
+
25
+ `site` is required. Use either `days` or an explicit `startDate` and `endDate` pair. `maxRows` bounds source retrieval and `limit` bounds returned queries. Supply `brandTerms` or `includeBrand:true` only when brand handling is intentional.
26
+
27
+ ## Interpret and act
28
+
29
+ Check `dataStatus` before reading `items`: `empty`, `filtered`, `partial`, and `available` mean different things. Preserve `dateRange`, `source.possiblyTruncated`, filters, `selection.invalidRows`, `selection.conflictingRows`, limited rows, warnings, and caveats. `methodology.observedAiPromptData` and `estimatedTrafficLift` are explicitly false. Each item has `evidenceScope: retained-gsc-query`; its prompts inherit that narrow scope.
30
+
31
+ Safe actions are to select representative prompt variants, store the source query and date range beside later observations, and refresh the corpus on a controlled schedule. Do not report generated prompt count as AI demand, fill missing prompts with guessed traffic, or interpret no returned rows as an all-clear when the source is partial or filtering removed candidates.
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
1
+ interface:
2
+ display_name: "Queries to AI prompts"
3
+ short_description: "Convert retained GSC wording into deterministic monitoring prompts"
4
+ default_prompt: "Use $seo-to-ai-query to run the seo-to-ai-query report and explain its evidence and limits."
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: setup-check
3
+ description: Check whether local SEO Skills CLI authentication and defaults are usable; use it before reports when login, scopes, or saved configuration may be incomplete.
4
+ ---
5
+
6
+ # Check local setup
7
+
8
+ Run `setup-check` before blaming a report for an authentication or configuration
9
+ failure. It reads local setup state and separates missing credentials, missing
10
+ Google scopes, and absent defaults from actual SEO evidence. A passing result
11
+ means the local prerequisites look present. It does not prove that a token is
12
+ still accepted by Google or that the account can access a particular property.
13
+
14
+ ## Run the report
15
+
16
+ With MCP, call `seo_list_reports` with `{"category":"setup"}`. Then call
17
+ `seo_describe_report` with `{"id":"setup-check"}` and use the returned schema.
18
+ Finally call `seo_run_report` with `{"id":"setup-check","params":{}}`. The report
19
+ accepts no parameters, so do not invent a site, project, or refresh field.
20
+
21
+ The CLI exposes the same registry and schema:
22
+
23
+ ```sh
24
+ seo reports describe setup-check --json
25
+ seo reports run setup-check --params '{}' --json
26
+ ```
27
+
28
+ Read MCP `structuredContent` or the CLI JSON as the machine contract. Use the
29
+ text response only as a short presentation layer.
30
+
31
+ ## Interpret the checks
32
+
33
+ Start with `ok`, then inspect every entry in `checks`. `status` distinguishes a
34
+ blocking `fail` from a non-blocking `warn`; `detail` records what was observed;
35
+ `fix` gives the matching local remedy when one exists. `generatedAt` tells you
36
+ when the filesystem and token metadata were checked. Missing saved GSC or GA4
37
+ defaults are normally warnings because explicit report parameters can replace
38
+ them.
39
+
40
+ Never copy account emails, token contents, OAuth client values, private keys,
41
+ or local credential files into an answer. Summarise the check id, status, and a
42
+ safe fix instead.
43
+
44
+ ## Act safely
45
+
46
+ Apply the narrow fix attached to a failed check, such as logging in again or
47
+ restoring the same OAuth client used by stored tokens. Re-run `setup-check`, then run
48
+ a small read-only report for the intended property. Do not treat a setup pass
49
+ as evidence about rankings, indexing, analytics accuracy, or site health.
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
1
+ interface:
2
+ display_name: "Doctor"
3
+ short_description: "Check local seo auth and configuration"
4
+ default_prompt: "Use $setup-check to run the setup-check report and explain its evidence and limits."
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: site-crawl
3
+ description: Build a bounded technical SEO inventory with explicit request, page, issue, and completeness evidence. Use for a site baseline or to save a stable crawl for focused follow-up reports.
4
+ ---
5
+
6
+ # Crawl a site
7
+
8
+ A crawl observes what the configured fetcher could discover and retrieve during one run. It is the foundation for most technical reports, but it is not an index, traffic source, or guarantee of complete site coverage. Set a deliberate page and depth budget, then save the snapshot when later analysis must share the same evidence.
9
+
10
+ ## Run it
11
+
12
+ For MCP, call `seo_list_reports` with category `crawl` when discovery is needed. Call `seo_describe_report` with `{ "id": "site-crawl" }`, then `seo_run_report` with:
13
+
14
+ ```json
15
+ {
16
+ "id": "site-crawl",
17
+ "params": {
18
+ "url": "https://example.com/",
19
+ "maxPages": 100,
20
+ "maxDepth": 3,
21
+ "saveReport": true
22
+ }
23
+ }
24
+ ```
25
+
26
+ Check `isError` and consume MCP `structuredContent`. The same run is available from the CLI:
27
+
28
+ ```sh
29
+ seo reports describe site-crawl --json
30
+ seo reports run site-crawl --params '{"url":"https://example.com/","maxPages":100,"maxDepth":3,"saveReport":true}' --json
31
+ ```
32
+
33
+ Describe the schema before adding `include`, `exclude`, sitemap, robots, JavaScript, or fetch-rate controls; their interaction changes the evidence collected.
34
+
35
+ ## Judge the crawl before the site
36
+
37
+ Start with status, `requestEvidenceStatus`, attempted and fetched counts, failures, retained pages, `pageLimitReached`, data-source states, warnings, and caveats. A partial or capped crawl cannot support an all-clear or a definitive zero. Raw `pages`, `requests`, and full `issues` are opt-in because they can be large; request only what the next decision needs.
38
+
39
+ Separate observations from defects. Response failures and contradictory indexability signals deserve investigation, while canonicals, robots rules, `noindex`, and snippet limits may be intentional. Use the compact top fixes for triage, then run `affected-urls` and `explain-crawl-issue` before creating work. Preserve the report id and crawl settings for verification. If JavaScript rendering was disabled or discovery depended on the sitemap or internal links, state that boundary when summarizing results.
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
1
+ interface:
2
+ display_name: "Crawl site"
3
+ short_description: "Crawl a site for technical SEO evidence"
4
+ default_prompt: "Use $site-crawl to run the site-crawl report and explain its evidence and limits."
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: striking-distance
3
+ description: Find retained GSC query-page rows with average positions from 11 through 20; use it to build a bounded review queue near page-one visibility.
4
+ ---
5
+
6
+ # Review striking-distance rows
7
+
8
+ Use `striking-distance` to find query-page combinations whose retained GSC
9
+ average position falls from 11 through 20. This range can surface useful review
10
+ candidates, but it is a heuristic boundary. Average position varies by search,
11
+ device, country, and day, so the report does not prove that a URL consistently
12
+ ranks on a literal second results page or predict how many clicks a change will
13
+ produce.
14
+
15
+ ## Run the report
16
+
17
+ With MCP, call `seo_list_reports` with `{"category":"diagnosis"}`, call
18
+ `seo_describe_report` with `{"id":"striking-distance"}`, then call
19
+ `seo_run_report` with only described parameters. Example:
20
+ `{"id":"striking-distance","params":{"site":"sc-domain:example.com","days":28,"minImpressions":50,"limit":10,"includeBrand":false,"verifyContent":true,"verifyLimit":5}}`.
21
+
22
+ The CLI has exact registry parity:
23
+
24
+ ```sh
25
+ seo reports describe striking-distance --json
26
+ seo reports run striking-distance --params '{"site":"sc-domain:example.com","days":28,"minImpressions":50,"limit":10,"includeBrand":false,"verifyContent":true,"verifyLimit":5}' --json
27
+ ```
28
+
29
+ Add `brandTerms`, JavaScript rendering, or bounded fetch-rate controls only
30
+ after inspecting the schema and when the investigation needs them.
31
+
32
+ ## Interpret the output
33
+
34
+ Check `range`, `rangeDays`, `dataStatus`, and `source` before the item list.
35
+ `source.possiblyTruncated` and retained-row completeness limit any all-clear.
36
+ Use `selection` to see what was invalid, outside the position range, branded,
37
+ below thresholds, eligible, returned, or limited. `methodology` explains the
38
+ priority heuristic.
39
+
40
+ For each item, read the observed query, URL, clicks, impressions, CTR, average
41
+ position, recommendation evidence, and optional `contentVerification`.
42
+ `verification` reports requested, attempted, verified, technical, and failed
43
+ counts; unverified or failed pages must keep lower confidence. Groups and
44
+ templates show repeated patterns only within retained candidates.
45
+
46
+ ## Act safely
47
+
48
+ Audit a small number of high-impression candidates. Fix verified technical
49
+ problems first; otherwise compare intent, title framing, page coverage, and
50
+ internal links against observed query evidence. Do not rewrite a page solely
51
+ because it sits inside the position band, and do not present the priority score
52
+ as expected traffic or ranking lift.
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
1
+ interface:
2
+ display_name: "Striking distance"
3
+ short_description: "Find retained GSC query and page rows averaging positions 11 through 20"
4
+ default_prompt: "Use $striking-distance to run the striking-distance report and explain its evidence and limits."
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: technical-watch
3
+ description: Coordinate crawl comparison, URL Inspection monitoring, and optional link recovery. Use it for a bounded recurring watch without claiming inventory-wide coverage.
4
+ ---
5
+
6
+ # Technical watch workflow
7
+
8
+ This workflow watches several technical surfaces together: crawl change,
9
+ sitemap-derived URL inspection, and optional recovery of historically valuable
10
+ links. It is useful after releases and on a schedule. Its components have
11
+ different coverage and freshness, so a successful run does not prove every URL
12
+ is crawlable, indexed, unchanged, or free of issues.
13
+
14
+ ## Run it
15
+
16
+ Use the exact MCP discovery flow:
17
+
18
+ 1. Call `seo_list_reports` with `category: "workflows"` and select `technical-watch`.
19
+ 2. Call `seo_describe_report` with `id: "technical-watch"`; choose the components required.
20
+ 3. Call `seo_run_report` with that id and only schema-valid parameters.
21
+
22
+ CLI parity:
23
+
24
+ ```sh
25
+ seo reports describe technical-watch --json
26
+ seo reports run technical-watch --params '{"site":"sc-domain:example.com","startUrl":"https://example.com/","sitemaps":["https://example.com/sitemap.xml"],"limit":250,"dailyLimit":200,"inspectLimit":25,"recoverLinks":true}' --json
27
+ ```
28
+
29
+ Provide `startUrl` for crawl comparison and `sitemaps` for index monitoring.
30
+ `dailyLimit`, `inspectLimit`, `maxUrls`, and crawl `limit` are real coverage
31
+ bounds. Enable `js` only when rendering is required.
32
+
33
+ ## Interpret and act
34
+
35
+ Inspect every workflow step and nested `crawl`, `index`, and `recovery` output
36
+ independently. For crawls, compare run ids, limits, failures, warnings, and
37
+ changed items. For inspection, distinguish selected, unselected-due, attempted,
38
+ failed, quota-blocked, deferred, current issue, and regression states. URL
39
+ Inspection is a provider snapshot; sitemap discovery is not proof of indexing.
40
+ For recovery, historical clicks-at-risk are observed history, not forecast loss.
41
+
42
+ Reproduce new failures, verify redirect chains and intentional controls, then
43
+ fix confirmed regressions with a rollback path. Schedule another bounded run to
44
+ confirm recovery. Never remove `noindex`, canonicals, robots rules, or redirects
45
+ without checking intent. Partial crawls, capped sitemap inventories, quotas,
46
+ and failed subqueries must stay visible in any all-clear statement.
47
+
48
+ Use MCP `structuredContent` for automation and Markdown only for the human watch
49
+ summary.
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
1
+ interface:
2
+ display_name: "Technical watch workflow"
3
+ short_description: "Run crawl-diff and URL Inspection monitoring together"
4
+ default_prompt: "Use $technical-watch to run the technical-watch report and explain its evidence and limits."
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: top-fixes
3
+ description: Rank recurring technical crawl findings into a bounded implementation queue with visible scoring factors. Use for triage before inspecting affected URLs and rule-level evidence.
4
+ ---
5
+
6
+ # Prioritize technical fixes
7
+
8
+ Large crawls need triage, but priority must remain explainable. This report groups issues by rule and ranks them using severity, affected-page count, estimated effort, and any available Search Console or analytics evidence. It is a deterministic queue from retained evidence, not a forecast of rankings, traffic, conversions, or revenue.
9
+
10
+ ## Run it
11
+
12
+ For MCP, call `seo_list_reports` with category `crawl` only when discovery is needed. Call `seo_describe_report` with `{ "id": "top-fixes" }`, then call `seo_run_report` with:
13
+
14
+ ```json
15
+ {
16
+ "id": "top-fixes",
17
+ "params": {
18
+ "reportId": "crawl_example_20260710",
19
+ "category": "metadata",
20
+ "limit": 5
21
+ }
22
+ }
23
+ ```
24
+
25
+ Confirm `isError` is false and read `structuredContent`. CLI parity is:
26
+
27
+ ```sh
28
+ seo reports describe top-fixes --json
29
+ seo reports run top-fixes --params '{"reportId":"crawl_example_20260710","category":"metadata","limit":5}' --json
30
+ ```
31
+
32
+ Use `url` only for an intentional fresh crawl. Reusing a saved report keeps the queue tied to the same issue inventory.
33
+
34
+ ## Turn priority into work
35
+
36
+ Read `dataSources`, summary, warnings, and caveats before the ranked fixes. For each item inspect the rule id, affected count, sample URLs, `scoreFactors`, `whyThisRanks`, effort, fix guidance, and verification steps. Missing provider joins must stay unavailable; numeric zeros are meaningful only when the corresponding source is complete and valid.
37
+
38
+ The category and result limits narrow the queue, while the original crawl may also be capped or partial. Therefore rank means "highest among retained eligible findings," not globally highest. Run `affected-urls` for the same rule and report id, inspect representative templates, and use `explain-crawl-issue` before assigning work. Confirm intentional indexability and canonical controls with the publisher. After implementation, repeat the same crawl configuration and verify the observed rule evidence rather than relying on a score change alone.
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
1
+ interface:
2
+ display_name: "Top fixes"
3
+ short_description: "Return a bounded technical fix queue from crawl evidence"
4
+ default_prompt: "Use $top-fixes to run the top-fixes report and explain its evidence and limits."
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: traffic-anomaly
3
+ description: Test whether recent finalized GSC clicks or impressions differ unusually from an observed baseline; use it to confirm movement before investigating possible causes.
4
+ ---
5
+
6
+ # Detect unusual traffic movement
7
+
8
+ Use `traffic-anomaly` when a dashboard looks different and you need a
9
+ repeatable check against recent history. It compares a recent finalized GSC
10
+ window with an observed baseline for clicks and impressions. Statistical
11
+ unusualness helps decide whether deeper investigation is warranted. It does not
12
+ identify a cause, diagnose a site defect, or prove that an external event
13
+ affected the property.
14
+
15
+ ## Run the report
16
+
17
+ With MCP, call `seo_list_reports` with `{"category":"diagnosis"}`. Call
18
+ `seo_describe_report` with `{"id":"traffic-anomaly"}` before choosing windows.
19
+ Then call `seo_run_report`, for example
20
+ `{"id":"traffic-anomaly","params":{"site":"sc-domain:example.com","days":90,"recentDays":7,"refresh":false}}`.
21
+
22
+ CLI parity uses the same report definition:
23
+
24
+ ```sh
25
+ seo reports describe traffic-anomaly --json
26
+ seo reports run traffic-anomaly --params '{"site":"sc-domain:example.com","days":90,"recentDays":7,"refresh":false}' --json
27
+ ```
28
+
29
+ The discovery schema currently exposes broad numeric types for these window
30
+ fields. Use sensible positive whole-day values even though all bounds are not
31
+ expressed in JSON Schema.
32
+
33
+ ## Interpret the output
34
+
35
+ Read `coverage` first. Confirm the requested dates, expected and observed days,
36
+ missing days, invalid rows, duplicate rows, and `status`. Partial coverage can
37
+ change the baseline and must stay in the conclusion. `rows` is not a quality
38
+ verdict.
39
+
40
+ Each entry in `anomalies` names the metric, baseline and comparison dates,
41
+ means and totals, `percentChange`, `zScore`, `significanceMethod`, `direction`,
42
+ and `significant`. A null percentage from a zero baseline is different from
43
+ zero change. `outside-flat-baseline` handles movement where an observed
44
+ baseline has no variance; it still describes only the supplied data.
45
+
46
+ ## Act safely
47
+
48
+ If movement is significant and coverage is adequate, run `segment-impact` for
49
+ pages and queries, then check site changes, seasonality, indexing, and tracking.
50
+ If it is normal, keep monitoring rather than forcing a story. Never label the
51
+ result a penalty, algorithm update, recovery, or causal diagnosis without
52
+ independent evidence.
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
1
+ interface:
2
+ display_name: "Traffic anomaly"
3
+ short_description: "Detect statistically unusual recent GSC movement"
4
+ default_prompt: "Use $traffic-anomaly to run the traffic-anomaly report and explain its evidence and limits."
@@ -0,0 +1,51 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: update-correlation
3
+ description: Overlay finalized GSC anomaly windows with official Google ranking-update dates; use it for timing context while keeping attribution explicitly unestablished.
4
+ ---
5
+
6
+ # Add update timing context
7
+
8
+ Use `update-correlation` only after defining the traffic window you want to
9
+ examine. It combines the anomaly analysis with official ranking incident dates
10
+ and known local changes. Overlap can make an update a reasonable investigation
11
+ context. It cannot show that the update caused a gain or loss, even when the
12
+ movement is large and no other change has been recorded.
13
+
14
+ ## Run the report
15
+
16
+ With MCP, call `seo_list_reports` with `{"category":"diagnosis"}`. Call
17
+ `seo_describe_report` with `{"id":"update-correlation"}`, then use
18
+ `seo_run_report`, for example
19
+ `{"id":"update-correlation","params":{"site":"sc-domain:example.com","days":90,"recentDays":7,"paddingDays":2,"refresh":false}}`.
20
+
21
+ The same definition is available through the CLI:
22
+
23
+ ```sh
24
+ seo reports describe update-correlation --json
25
+ seo reports run update-correlation --params '{"site":"sc-domain:example.com","days":90,"recentDays":7,"paddingDays":2,"refresh":false}' --json
26
+ ```
27
+
28
+ The schema currently types window and padding values as general numbers. Pass
29
+ positive whole-day values and avoid excessive padding that makes overlap almost
30
+ inevitable.
31
+
32
+ ## Interpret the output
33
+
34
+ Start with `classification`, but always keep `attribution` and `confidence` in
35
+ view. The report intentionally returns attribution as `not-established` and
36
+ confidence as `none`. Inspect the underlying `anomalies`, exact
37
+ `overlappingUpdates`, and `confounders` before repeating the summary.
38
+
39
+ Use `evidence` for observed movement and date overlap, `caveats` for window,
40
+ padding, freshness, and source limits, and `source` to identify the official
41
+ feed. `significant-movement-with-update-overlap` means both facts occurred in
42
+ the configured window. `update-overlap-without-significant-movement` is not an
43
+ impact result. `no-update-overlap` does not explain any movement that remains.
44
+
45
+ ## Act safely
46
+
47
+ Test saved deploys, redirects, pruning, blocking, tracking, and content changes
48
+ first when they overlap. Use `segment-impact` or the postmortem workflow to map
49
+ affected templates and queries. Preserve winning patterns and investigate
50
+ losers with page-level evidence. Never describe temporal overlap as a penalty,
51
+ reward, recovery, or confirmed algorithm effect.
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
1
+ interface:
2
+ display_name: "Update correlation"
3
+ short_description: "Compare recent GSC movement with official Google ranking update windows"
4
+ default_prompt: "Use $update-correlation to run the update-correlation report and explain its evidence and limits."
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
1
+ ---
2
+ name: update-postmortem
3
+ description: Compare retained winners and losers around a Google ranking update window. Use it to structure a postmortem while explicitly keeping causation unestablished.
4
+ ---
5
+
6
+ # Update postmortem workflow
7
+
8
+ This workflow organizes performance movement around a known Google update,
9
+ including template and segment evidence plus optional local change-log context.
10
+ It helps identify where to investigate. Temporal overlap and exposure do not
11
+ prove that the update caused any change, and retained winners and losers are not
12
+ a complete property inventory when sources are capped or filtered.
13
+
14
+ ## Run it
15
+
16
+ Use the exact MCP discovery flow:
17
+
18
+ 1. Call `seo_list_reports` with `category: "workflows"` and select `update-postmortem`.
19
+ 2. Call `seo_describe_report` with `id: "update-postmortem"`; inspect the current schema.
20
+ 3. Call `seo_run_report` with that id and only described parameters.
21
+
22
+ CLI parity:
23
+
24
+ ```sh
25
+ seo reports describe update-postmortem --json
26
+ seo reports run update-postmortem --params '{"site":"sc-domain:example.com","days":90,"recentDays":7,"limit":10,"includeBrand":false,"knownConfounders":["Site migration on 2026-05-12"],"includeChangeLog":true}' --json
27
+ ```
28
+
29
+ Record specific known confounders rather than vague suspicions. The change log
30
+ is supporting context, not automatic attribution.
31
+
32
+ ## Interpret and act
33
+
34
+ Start with workflow step statuses, finalized date windows, source completeness,
35
+ failed measurements, retained limits, and caveats. Then inspect `update`,
36
+ `insights`, `templateMovement`, and `segments`. Keep positive and negative
37
+ movement visible. The report's cause remains not established even when dates
38
+ overlap. Compare like-for-like metrics and note brand filtering, invalid rows,
39
+ duplicate aggregation, and partial provider results.
40
+
41
+ Safe next steps are falsifiable: inspect representative URLs from affected
42
+ segments, reproduce technical changes, compare deployed templates, validate the
43
+ local change log, and measure a bounded intervention. Preserve known
44
+ confounders in the handoff. Do not roll back, rewrite, merge, or delete content
45
+ solely because it appears among losers. Never claim update causation, recovery
46
+ probability, future traffic, or ranking impact from this workflow.
47
+
48
+ Use MCP `structuredContent` as the machine contract and Markdown only for the
49
+ human-readable postmortem.
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
1
+ interface:
2
+ display_name: "Update postmortem workflow"
3
+ short_description: "Analyze winners and losers around a Google ranking update window"
4
+ default_prompt: "Use $update-postmortem to run the update-postmortem report and explain its evidence and limits."
package/.jshintrc DELETED
@@ -1,18 +0,0 @@
1
- {
2
- "globals" : {
3
- /* MOCHA */
4
- "describe" : false,
5
- "it" : false,
6
- "before" : false,
7
- "beforeEach" : false,
8
- "after" : false,
9
- "afterEach" : false,
10
-
11
- /* COMMONJS / NODE */
12
- "module" : false,
13
- "require" : false,
14
- "console" : false,
15
- "process" : false,
16
- "global" : false
17
- }
18
- }
package/.npmignore DELETED
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
1
- .DS_Store
2
- node_modules
3
- .seo-cache
package/.travis.yml DELETED
@@ -1,3 +0,0 @@
1
- language: node_js
2
- node_js:
3
- - "0.10"
package/Makefile DELETED
@@ -1,10 +0,0 @@
1
- REPORTER = spec
2
-
3
- test:
4
- @./node_modules/.bin/mocha \
5
- --require ./test/init.js \
6
- --require should \
7
- --reporter $(REPORTER) \
8
- test/*.test.js
9
-
10
- .PHONY: all test
package/index.js DELETED
@@ -1,2 +0,0 @@
1
- 'use strict';
2
- module.exports = require('./lib/seo');