secaudit 0.1.2 → 0.1.3

package/dist/index.js

@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ function buildCli() {
     };
     let resolved;
     if (opts.llm) {
-      const { routeIntentWithLlm } = await import("./llm-router-JZRXUHBF.js");
+      const { routeIntentWithLlm } = await import("./llm-router-VJY3IEQA.js");
       resolved = await routeIntentWithLlm(text, overrides, opts.model);
     } else {
       resolved = routeIntent(text, overrides);

package/dist/{llm-router-JZRXUHBF.js → llm-router-VJY3IEQA.js}

@@ -33,10 +33,8 @@ Respond with ONLY a JSON object in this exact format:
   "reasoning": "brief explanation of your choices"
 }
 
-IMPORTANT: Only include steps you believe are necessary to fulfill the user's request.
-If the user only asks about risks, you may not need financials.
-If the request seems straightforward, you may skip validation.
-Use your judgment \u2014 include only what's needed.`;
+Given the user's request, select only the steps needed to produce the requested output.
+Not every request requires every step.`;
 var DEFAULT_MODEL = "gpt-4o-mini";
 async function routeIntentWithLlm(text, overrides, model) {
   const apiKey = process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY;
@@ -50,7 +48,7 @@ async function routeIntentWithLlm(text, overrides, model) {
   console.log(`  [llm] Sending intent to ${selectedModel}...`);
   const response = await client.chat.completions.create({
     model: selectedModel,
-    temperature: 0.7,
+    temperature: 1,
     messages: [
       { role: "system", content: SYSTEM_PROMPT },
       { role: "user", content: text }

package/package.json

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 {
   "name": "secaudit",
-  "version": "0.1.2",
+  "version": "0.1.3",
   "description": "Deterministic 10-K filing analyzer — command-driven vs intent-based invocation. Proves that intent-based invocation is probabilistic; command-driven invocation is deterministic and auditable.",
   "type": "module",
   "bin": {