sdg-agents 1.0.5

package/src/assets/dev-guides/prompt-tracks/01-new-evolution/02-architecture/04-security-and-access.md

@@ -0,0 +1,63 @@
+# 03 - Security and Access
+
+## Authentication and Authorization
+
+- How does the user identify themselves (OAuth2, JWT, SAML)?
+- How do we control permissions (RBAC, ABAC)?
+
+## Data Protection
+
+- How do we protect data at rest (Encryption at rest)?
+- How do we protect data in transit (TLS/SSL)?
+- How do we manage secrets (HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager)?
+
+## Audit and Logs
+
+- Which actions are recorded in audit logs?
+- Where are these logs securely stored?
+
+---
+
+## Learn by Examples
+
+### ❌ Bad Example
+
+```markdown
+# 03 - Security and Access
+
+## Authentication and Authorization
+
+User and password in the database.
+
+## Data Protection
+
+We will use HTTPS.
+
+## Audit
+
+Record to the server console.
+```
+
+> **Rationale**: Plain text passwords are unacceptable. HTTPS only solves transit, not rest. Console logs disappear on reboot.
+
+### ✅ Good Example
+
+```markdown
+# 03 - Security and Access
+
+## Authentication and Authorization
+
+- **Authn**: JWT with RSA-256 and 15min expiration time.
+- **Authz**: Platform-native RBAC (Role-Based Access Control).
+
+## Data Protection
+
+- **Rest**: AES-256 for the Tax ID (CPF) field in the database.
+- **Secrets**: Injected via AWS Secrets Manager at runtime.
+
+## Audit
+
+Mutation logs sent to CloudWatch Logs with 2-year retention for compliance.
+```
+
+> **Rationale**: Defines algorithms (RSA-256, AES-256), specific tools, and compliance policies (2-year log retention).

package/src/assets/dev-guides/prompt-tracks/01-new-evolution/02-architecture/05-security-audit.md

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+# 04 - Audit and Threat Modeling
+
+## Threat Modeling
+
+- What are the main attack vectors identified (e.g., OWASP Top 10)?
+- How do we mitigate "Supply Chain" and dependency attacks?
+
+## Audit Plan
+
+- Who will perform the audit (Internal team, Pentest company)?
+- How often (Every major release, annually)?
+- Which automated security tools (SAST/DAST) will be integrated?
+
+## Resilience and Response
+
+- How does the system behave under attack (Fail-safe)?
+- What is the response plan for security incidents?
+
+---
+
+## Learn by Examples
+
+### ❌ Bad Example
+
+```markdown
+# 04 - Audit and Threat Modeling
+
+## Threat Modeling
+
+The system will be secure against hackers.
+
+## Audit Plan
+
+We'll do a test before launching.
+
+## Resilience
+
+If it goes down, we'll bring it back up.
+```
+
+> **Rationale**: "Secure against hackers" is an aspiration, not a specification. It doesn't define tools or concrete plans.
+
+### ✅ Good Example
+
+```markdown
+# 04 - Audit and Threat Modeling
+
+## Threat Modeling
+
+- Focus on avoiding Broken Access Control (OWASP #1) through forced auditing in API interceptors.
+- Supply Chain mitigation via dependency scanner (Snyk) blocking the CI in case of critical failures.
+
+## Audit Plan
+
+- Bi-weekly DAST scan via OWASP ZAP in Staging environment.
+- Annual external Pentest performed by a CREST-certified company.
+
+## Resilience
+
+- Aggressive Rate Limit (100 req/min/IP) to prevent Brute Force.
+- Transparent Circuit Breaker: if the Authentication service fails, all accesses are denied (Fail-closed).
+```
+
+> **Rationale**: Defines specific attacks (Broken Access Control), tools (Snyk, OWASP ZAP), frequency, and failure behaviors (`Fail-closed`).

package/src/assets/dev-guides/prompt-tracks/01-new-evolution/02-architecture/06-design-system-ux.md

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+# 05 - Design System and UX
+
+## Platforms and Devices
+
+- Which devices will be supported (Web, Desktop, Mobile)?
+- Is there a need for a PWA (Progressive Web App)?
+
+## Design System (Tokens)
+
+- **Colors**: 60/30/10 Rule definition (Primary, Secondary, and Contrast).
+- **Typography**: Chosen fonts for readability (e.g., Inter, Roboto).
+
+## Accessibility (A11y)
+
+- Does the system meet WCAG compliance (Level AA)?
+- How do we ensure contrast and keyboard navigation?
+
+## Micro-interactions
+
+- What animations and visual feedbacks will be standard (Hover, Loading)?
+
+---
+
+## Learn by Examples
+
+### ❌ Bad Example
+
+```markdown
+# 05 - Design System and UX
+
+## Platforms
+
+Web only for now.
+
+## Design System
+
+Nice colors (Orange and Blue).
+
+## Accessibility
+
+We'll look into it later.
+```
+
+> **Rationale**: Vague and neglects accessibility, which is a compliance requirement. "Nice colors" is not a technical definition of tokens.
+
+### ✅ Good Example
+
+```markdown
+# 05 - Design System and UX
+
+## Platforms and Devices
+
+PWA for mobile devices and Web Desktop (Responsive First).
+
+## Design System (Tokens)
+
+- **60%**: Neutral Gray (#F8F9FA) - Main background.
+- **30%**: Brand Blue (#0056B3) - Buttons and headers.
+- **10%**: Contrast Amber (#FFC107) - CTAs and alerts.
+- **Font**: Inter (Sans-serif) for body, Montserrat for headings.
+
+## Accessibility (A11y)
+
+- Minimum contrast of 4.5:1 on all text (WCAG AA).
+- Full keyboard (Tab) navigation and labels for Screen Readers on all inputs.
+
+## Micro-interactions
+
+Glassmorphism effect on modals with a smooth 0.2s transition (`ease-in-out`).
+```
+
+> **Rationale**: Defines specific color tokens (HEX), robust typography, technical accessibility criteria, and interface states.

package/src/assets/dev-guides/prompt-tracks/01-new-evolution/02-architecture/07-ai-strategy.md

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+# 06 - AI Strategy
+
+## AI Engine
+
+- Which models (OpenAI, Claude, Llama 3) and what execution infrastructure?
+- Local Model (Ollama) or Cloud (Vertex AI)?
+
+## Integration and Tools
+
+- Will we use the MCP (Model Context Protocol) to connect tools?
+- How will RAG (Retrieval Augmented Generation) access external data?
+- Agents (LangChain, CrewAI) or pure LLM?
+
+## AI Privacy and Governance
+
+- How do we prevent PII (Personally Identifiable Information) leakage in prompts?
+- Is there an audit of AI inputs and outputs?
+
+## Costs and Limits
+
+- Monthly budget per million tokens (Input/Output).
+- Rate limits per user.
+
+---
+
+## Learn by Examples
+
+### ❌ Bad Example
+
+```markdown
+# 06 - AI Strategy
+
+## AI Engine
+
+Use ChatGPT for everything.
+
+## Integration
+
+Chat on the interface.
+
+## Privacy
+
+AI is smart and knows what it's doing.
+```
+
+> **Rationale**: Ignores token costs, privacy risks, and infrastructure (API SLA).
+
+### ✅ Good Example
+
+```markdown
+# 06 - AI Strategy
+
+## AI Engine
+
+GPT-4o via Azure OpenAI (Ensures data does not train the model).
+
+## Integration and Tools
+
+- MCP (Model Context Protocol) to allow the AI to execute internal audit scripts.
+- RAG via Pinecone (Vector DB) with 1000-token semantic chunking.
+
+## Privacy
+
+PII Preservation: Regex intercepting Tax IDs (CPFs) and names before sending to the API.
+
+## Costs
+
+- Budget: $5,000/month.
+- Limit: 50 requests/hour per user.
+```
+
+> **Rationale**: Defines robust technological choices (Azure OpenAI, Pinecone, MCP), data governance (PII Regex), and financial control (tokens/requests).

package/src/assets/dev-guides/prompt-tracks/01-new-evolution/02-architecture/08-observability.md

@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+# 07 - Observability (Logs, Metrics, and Traces)
+
+## System and Business Metrics
+
+- Which critical systemic metrics will be monitored (CPU, RAM usage, RPS, P99 Latency)?
+- Which business metrics (KPIs) will be extracted from the transactional system (Sales Balance, Registration Errors)?
+
+## Centralization and Log Standard
+
+- What log aggregation and search tool will be used (e.g., Grafana Loki, ELK Stack, Datadog)?
+- What structured format will be used for log ingestion (e.g., JSON)?
+- What will NEVER be logged (Sensitive Data/PII, Passwords)?
+
+## Distributed Tracing
+
+- Will the project adopt multi-service request tracking (OpenTelemetry, Jaeger)?
+- How will the `CorrelationID` or `TraceID` be propagated in HTTP Headers and Messaging Queues?
+
+---
+
+## Learn by Examples
+
+### ❌ Bad Example
+
+```markdown
+# 07 - Observability
+
+## Metrics
+
+We'll check the server to see if it doesn't go down.
+
+## Logs
+
+Send `console.log()` to the terminal and we'll read the server file if there's an error.
+
+## Tracing
+
+Create a random ID there.
+```
+
+> **Rationale**: Absence of proactive metrics. Waiting for it to "go down" to check the server is unacceptable at a professional level. Loose logs in the terminal are not searchable and violate compliance.
+
+### ✅ Good Example
+
+```markdown
+# 07 - Observability
+
+## System and Business Metrics
+
+- **Infra**: P95 Latency < 200ms and Memory Usage on the Grafana dashboard.
+- **Business**: Monitoring `OrderCreated` volume in the sales module via Prometheus.
+
+## Logs
+
+- **Standard**: Structured JSON in `Standard Output`.
+- **Aggregation**: Datadog (with 15-day retention).
+- **Security**: Tax IDs (CPFs) and Credit Cards will be masked at the source (Logger Library).
+
+## Distributed Tracing
+
+- **Propagation**: W3C Trace Context headers throughout the stack.
+- **Tool**: OpenTelemetry Collector exporting to Datadog APM.
+```
+
+> **Rationale**: Unambiguous definitions that allow for creating real-time alerts. The team will know about the error before the customer opens a ticket. Sensitive data protected by design.

package/src/assets/dev-guides/prompt-tracks/01-new-evolution/02-architecture/09-technical-documentation.md

@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+# 08 - Technical Documentation and Contracts
+
+## API Contracts (Public Specs)
+
+- How will endpoints and integrations be documented (Swagger, OpenAPI 3.0, GraphQL Schema)?
+- Will the documentation be generated dynamically via code (Annotations) or manually (separate YAML files)?
+
+## Architectural Decision Records (ADRs)
+
+- Does the project use Architectural Decision Records (ADRs) to record the "why" behind each technological choice that should not be altered (Immutable)?
+- In which directory will the ADRs live (e.g., `docs/adrs/`)?
+
+## Operation Guides and Runbooks
+
+- Where will the _Runbook_ on how to start the project live (Initial setup for new Devs)?
+- Are there _Playbooks_ on what to do if the main database goes down or if an external service is offline (Operational Resilience)?
+
+---
+
+## Learn by Examples
+
+### ❌ Bad Example
+
+```markdown
+# 08 - Technical Documentation
+
+## Contracts
+
+The backend API will have a Postman collection that we'll share on Slack.
+
+## Decisions
+
+We always decide orally in the Daily.
+
+## Guides
+
+Just read the code; it's "self-documenting".
+```
+
+> **Rationale**: Code does not document obsolete business rules or external contracts. Relying on temporary Slack messages is anti-architecture.
+
+### ✅ Good Example
+
+```markdown
+# 08 - Technical Documentation
+
+## API Contracts
+
+- **Standard**: OpenAPI 3.1
+- **Generation Engine**: Swaggo (Go annotations) auto-generated in the build pipeline and served at `/swagger/index.html`.
+- **Automatic Validation**: _Spectral Linter_ will run in the CI ensuring the use of HTTPS and error payload description.
+
+## Architectural Decision Records (ADRs)
+
+- **Location**: Dedicated folder `docs/decisions/`.
+- **Workflow**: No central library (ORM, Gateway) or new database should be added without a PR completing the corresponding ADR.
+
+## Operational Guides (Runbooks)
+
+- **Main Document**: `/README.md` with local script (`docker compose up`) and documented environment variables.
+- **Troubleshooting**: `docs/runbooks/db-failover.md` describing database restoration and health check commands.
+```
+
+> **Rationale**: Prepares the project for team scalability, smooth _Onboarding_, and is forget-proof. The auto-generated Swagger engine does not suffer from synchronization issues with commits.

package/src/assets/dev-guides/prompt-tracks/01-new-evolution/02-architecture/10-infrastructure-and-costs.md

@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+# 09 - Infrastructure and Costs (FinOps)
+
+Staff-level architecture understands that code costs money to run. Designing a cloud microservices system without understanding the underlying economics and its _Unit Economics_ is a serious architectural failure.
+
+## Unit Economics and Sizing
+
+- **Cost per Transaction:** How much does it cost, in terms of infrastructure, for the company to process 1 new Order/Customer in this module?
+- **Scale Estimation:** Given the expected traffic for the next 12 months, what is the estimated monthly _TCO (Total Cost of Ownership)_ in BRL/USD?
+- **Managed Dependencies:** Will we use an expensive managed database (e.g., RDS Aurora) or something fixed (e.g., EC2 + Docker)? Does the SLA justify the premium price paid?
+
+## Budget Protection
+
+- **Billing Alarms:** What are the upper thresholds defined in the cloud? (e.g., If the queue bottlenecks and climbs to $1,000 in a day of uncontrolled lambdas, who is notified via Slack?)
+- **Hidden Costs:** Was there an accounting for Network Outbound Traffic (Data Transfer Out), storage of giant Logs, and daily Database Snapshots?
+
+---
+
+## Learn by Examples
+
+### ❌ Bad Example
+
+```markdown
+# Infrastructure
+
+We'll use AWS K8S (EKS) because the team is already familiar with it and it's the current industry standard. It handles everything we need to send.
+```
+
+> **Rationale**: Wasteful. They don't even mention what "Everything we need" is. An EKS cluster costs > $70/month just for the _Control Plane_ while empty. Building on it to process 10 requests per day is financial amateurism disguised as scalability.
+
+### ✅ Good Example
+
+```markdown
+# Infrastructure: Invoice Generation Module (FinOps)
+
+- **Calculated Unit Cost:** We will use AWS Lambda. Each invoice (1 req + 2 database connections + s3) will last 800ms at 512MB RAM. Estimated at $0.0005 per invoice.
+- **Estimated Monthly TCO:** For 1 million expected invoices/month in Q4, the bill for this feature will be approx. $15 USD (Serverless).
+- **Budget Protection:** A $50/month Billing Alarm created on the `feature:invoice` tag. If it exceeds this, it's a sign of a bug in the infinite retry code. It will notify `#dev-alerts`.
+```
+
+> **Rationale**: Executive perfection. The developer proved they sized things, understood the demand-based Serverless payment model, and already prepared the safeguard against billing anomalies before spending a single cent of the company's money.

package/src/assets/dev-guides/prompt-tracks/01-new-evolution/02-architecture/11-data-privacy-compliance.md

@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+# 10 - Data Privacy and Compliance (LGPD/GDPR)
+
+Data protection laws are not just bureaucratic requirements; they require native architectures to support them. If a system is designed in an intertwined way, meeting a user's Right-to-be-Forgotten securely is almost impossible.
+
+## PII (Personally Identifiable Information) Mapping
+
+- Which columns in the new database store sensitive data (Name, Tax ID/CPF, Email, Card)?
+- What is the **Masking** strategy for this data when mirrored to Quality environments (Staging/QA) or sent to application logs (e.g., Datadog)?
+
+## Deletion and Retention
+
+- **Right to be Forgotten:** Can the system destroy `UserId=123` and maintain relational consistency? (e.g., order records become anonymous and linked to a `deleted_user` UUID).
+- **Retention Time:** What data _cannot_ be deleted at the user's request due to tax compliance, and for how long (e.g., invoices in Glacier)?
+
+---
+
+## Learn by Examples
+
+### ❌ Bad Example
+
+```markdown
+# LGPD Security
+
+We use TLS 1.2 on the site for LGPD. The database uses disk encryption, so LGPD is covered against hackers.
+```
+
+> **Rationale**: Naive. Encrypting the disk and using SSL prevents hacker breaches and unauthorized listening, but it doesn't solve real internal compliance (LGPD/GDPR) regarding the use and deletion of information by the data subject themselves if they request it tomorrow.
+
+### ✅ Good Example
+
+```markdown
+# Privacy By Design: Profile Module V2
+
+- **PII Mapped (`Users` table):** The `cpf`, `phone`, and `email` columns are classified as level A PII.
+- **Log Masking:** Our `pino-logger` library has been natively configured to obfuscate these keys (replacing the string with `***`). They will NEVER appear in the clear in Datadog.
+- **Deletion (GDPR/LGPD):** If the `DELETE /account` route is triggered:
+  1.  Real PII data in the `Users` table undergoes a _Hard Delete_.
+  2.  History in `Sales` remains (Legal/Tax Requirement), but its Foreign Key is mapped to an internal `anon-ledger` system, blocking primary identification.
+```
+
+> **Rationale**: The architecture is born legally shielded from million-dollar fines. Database IDs are designed anticipating the loss of parent data without crashing the Frontend in the future.

package/src/assets/dev-guides/prompt-tracks/01-new-evolution/02-architecture/12-performance-and-scale.md

@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+# 11 - Performance and Scale SLAs (Operations)
+
+Distributed systems that do not anticipate traffic contention will suffer "Cascading" unavailability (Timeout Avalanche). The architect needs to define the pain thresholds of their system in the contract.
+
+## Resilience Levers
+
+- **Rate Limiting:** Will the API block clients that call more than `100 req/min`? (Protect your database).
+- **Circuit Breakers:** If the partner microservice goes down (e.g., Payment Gateway), how long will our service continue waiting for a response before opening the circuit (e.g., fail-fast < 500ms)?
+- **Target Latency (SLOs - Service Level Objectives):** The strict p95 percentile must be `< 250ms`.
+
+## Structural Tactics (Cache vs Sync)
+
+- Will the reading be heavy? What goes to Cache (`Redis/Memcached`) and what will seek Primary Storage directly? Will we use asynchronous queues (Kafka/SQS) for the write model (CQRS)?
+
+---
+
+## Learn by Examples
+
+### ❌ Bad Example
+
+```markdown
+# Scalability
+
+It will hold up during Black Friday because our cloud is elastic (Autoscaling).
+```
+
+> **Rationale**: Failed promise. Scaling up 1,000 Frontend instances to hit a single stressed database will only exhaust the database's connection pool faster (Internal DDoS).
+
+### ✅ Good Example
+
+```markdown
+# Performance: Cart Module V2
+
+## P95 Latency (Target)
+
+- List Cart (GET): `< 150ms`.
+- Pay Cart (POST): `< 850ms` (Due to external acquirer latency).
+
+## Anti-Avalanche Measures
+
+- Redis Cache for the top 50 best-selling items (10m TTL).
+- Stripe HTTP connection will have a **strict 3-second timeout**. If Stripe does not return, the code throws a `PaymentGatewayTimeoutException` saving it to the database as Pending.
+- **Rate Limit (API Gateway):** 30 Requests per IP per Minute.
+```
+
+> **Rationale**: Defines strict rules and thresholds. The Sysadmin only needs to read this document to correctly configure the Nginx `Rate Limiting` firewall; the back-end developer won't forget to configure the Timeout in their HTTP Client!

package/src/assets/dev-guides/prompt-tracks/01-new-evolution/02-architecture/13-disaster-recovery.md

@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+# 12 - Disaster Recovery Plan (DR / BCP)
+
+Critical failures in cloud providers occur annually. "DROP TABLE" and _Ransomware_ incidents occur every hour. Designing from an SRE perspective requires us to document how the _software comes back to life_ after losing an entire region.
+
+## Critical Rescue Objectives
+
+- **RTO (Recovery Time Objective):** Promised time to C-Level to bring Core systems back online (e.g., < 4 hours)?
+- **RPO (Recovery Point Objective):** How many minutes or hours of sales data the company is willing to "lose" if the Main DB goes down? (Optimal Backup Point).
+
+## Multi-Zone and Cold Redundancy
+
+- How does your infrastructure respond to the failure of an entire _Availability Zone (AZ)_?
+- Do the "Terraform Infrastructure as Code (IaC)" have the state to bring up another datacenter in the _US-East-2_ Zone if _US-East-1_ fails permanently (Cold Architecture / Standby)?
+
+---
+
+## Learn by Examples
+
+### ❌ Bad Example
+
+```markdown
+# Disaster Recovery (DR)
+
+Our MySQL database takes a snapshot on AWS every day at midnight. And we have Terraform done for the K8S Cluster.
+```
+
+> **Rationale**: If the region goes down at noon, you've just thrown _12 hours of morning revenue in the trash_ (Unacceptable to the CEO). You're covering the minimum, but how does the team bring up this Terraform when the alert goes off?
+
+### ✅ Good Example
+
+```markdown
+# "Transactions V2" Module Recovery
+
+- **RTO (Recovery Target):** `Max 2 Hours` – Aurora database uses Auto-Failover (< 60 seconds). The ECS cluster has Multi-Zonal Autoscaling and will bring up containers in _eu-west-1b_ if _1a_ goes down.
+- **RPO (Data Acceptance):** `Max 5 Minutes` – Database has Continuous Backup (AWS PITR - Point-in-Time Recovery). Worst-case scenario, we lose only the transactional logs from the last 4.9 minutes.
+- **Chaos Simulations:** Performed annually through "Game Day" by the SRE and documented in `Incident Postmortems`.
+```
+
+> **Rationale**: The document reassures investors and C-Level leadership that corporate SLA laws and short RPOs were properly incorporated into the software before it was built and priced.

package/src/assets/dev-guides/prompt-tracks/01-new-evolution/02-architecture/14-architecture-approval.md

@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+# 14 - Architecture Approval
+
+## Artifacts Checklist
+
+- [ ] 01-folder-structure.md (Defined)
+- [ ] 02-design-patterns.md (Written)
+- [ ] 03-apis-and-communication.md (Gateways, gRPC, RabbitMQ defined)
+- [ ] 04-security-and-access.md (Approved)
+- [ ] 05-security-audit.md (Mapped)
+- [ ] 06-design-system-ux.md (Premium UX)
+- [ ] 07-ai-strategy.md (Intelligent)
+- [ ] 08-observability.md (Mandatory Logs/Metrics)
+- [ ] 09-technical-documentation.md (ADRs/Runbooks defined)
+- [ ] 10-infrastructure-and-costs.md (FinOps / Unit Economics calculated)
+- [ ] 11-data-privacy-compliance.md (LGPD Masking/Deletion mapped)
+- [ ] 12-performance-and-scale.md (SLAs and Rate Limits established)
+- [ ] 13-disaster-recovery.md (RTO/RPO targets assured)
+
+## Expert Approval
+
+- **Principal Architect**: [Signature/Date]
+- **UI/UX Designer**: [Signature/Date]
+- **Security (SecOps)**: [Signature/Date]
+- **DPO / SRE Lead**: [Signature/Date]
+
+## Definition of Readiness (Ready for Delivery)
+
+- [ ] Architecture diagrams, API contracts, and Message Brokers reviewed.
+- [ ] AI infrastructure choice (Local vs Cloud) approved.
+- [ ] Accessibility plan (A11y) validated.
+- [ ] Centralized Logging model configured (won't go to `stdout` in vain).
+- [ ] Estimated Cloud budget and Privacy Policies (Right to be Forgotten) outlined.
+
+---
+
+## Learn by Examples
+
+### ❌ Bad Example
+
+```markdown
+# 14 - Architecture Approval
+
+## Checklist
+
+- [x] Folder structure done.
+
+## Definition of Readiness
+
+- [x] The team knows what to do.
+```
+
+> **Rationale**: How do you prove that the team "knows what to do"? Is there an API design document? What about observability and documentation artifacts?
+
+### ✅ Good Example
+
+```markdown
+# 14 - Architecture Approval
+
+## Checklist
+
+- [x] 01-folder-structure.md (Hexagonal)
+- [x] 03-apis-and-communication.md (GraphQL, gRPC, RabbitMQ, and API Gateway validated)
+- [x] 06-design-system-ux.md (WCAG AA)
+- [x] 07-ai-strategy.md (MCP + Ollama)
+- [x] 08-observability.md (Datadog + Tracer)
+- [x] 09-technical-documentation.md (Auto-generated OpenAPI)
+- [x] 10-infrastructure-and-costs.md (AWS Lambda Serverless < $15/month target)
+- [x] 13-disaster-recovery.md (5-minute PITR RPO mapped)
+
+## Expert Approval
+
+- **UI/UX Designer**: Julia Silver (Approved on 2026-05-20)
+
+## Definition of Readiness
+
+- [x] Color palette (60/30/10 Rule) exported to CSS Variables.
+- [x] 1,000-token limit per AI request configured in the Proxy.
+- [x] Base Grafana dashboards imported (CPU/RPS Dashboards).
+```
+
+> **Rationale**: Ensures that technical (Interfaces/Events), visual (UX), intelligent (AI), as well as SRE (Costs, Performance, Disaster, and Privacy) pillars were formally validated before the first line of code is written.